Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
10040 отзывов пользователей о Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
Пользовались
Canon PowerShot SX160 IS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Camera Modes
I tried fully automatic, and though it was far and away the best full automatic I have ever tried, I never use it. I use manual mode almost exclusively because the results are far-far better still. I especially like the C mode, where it remembers the settings I like best.
Depth of Field
Shallow depth of field is not possible. As with all cameras in this class, the sensor is very small. If you check a hyperfocal chart, you will see that the range of focus is always very broad regardless of aperture. While you can focus on a flower within millimeters of the lens, you won't get that nice out of focus background even at f2.8. Comparing test photos of landscapes with objects from 12" to infinity, at every aperture between f2.8 and f8 (the full available range), everything was in focus almost equally. P&S people probably would consider this an advantage, but the aspiring photographer would not.
Speed vs. Resolution
If you want to photograph birds, animals and action, you need strong light. While the speed of this camera is excellent, short of a DSLR, balancing between low ISO for sharpness and fast shutter speed for eliminating blur can keep you turning dials instead of watching for that special moment. I haven't gotten a good bird shot yet.
Light
Using a tripod I have gotten many beautiful shots between 80-400 ISO. Hand held shots up to 1/32 second are not a problem with the stabilizer. Indoor shots with ambient light are good as long as the subject is still and there is contrast to focus on. The live histogram can be way off under low light conditions, but the playback histogram is a good guide for proper exposure. The spot meter and +/-2 stop indicator works great for the Zone system. Detail falls off quickly at about +1-1/3 stops but holds down to about -3 stops, so erring on the under-exposure side works best. The aperture does not go down very small, so long exposures for blurring waves and waterfalls requires very low light or ND filters.
Other
This camera has no RAW format. You have to buy its stable mate at +$100 to get that. 52mm filters can be screwed in, though the lens isn't actually threaded for them and it is fussy. A third party adaptor for 58mm filters is available, which makes filter changes much easier. Vignetting is the same either filter size and starts when 2 filters are stacked at full wide angle. Lens flare shows up in my photos frequently, so I bought an oversized aftermarket lens hood and screwed it to the 58mm filter adaptor.
Overall I would say the SX10is was a good choice, given that as a beginning photographer I had little real basis to make a decision. I needed a safe, jack-of-all-trades to gain some experience and learn with. Though I have found some limitations to the camera, I will be the greater limitation to its potential for quite some time. In 2-3 years, digital cameras will be even better, and the potential of a more expensive model will not have been wasted on my meager skills.
[...]
The recall applies to 530 and 540 models with certain serial numbers or if your hinge appears as defective.
Well after attaching the Lenmar to my Canon videocamera the battery looked to be the perfect fit until after its attachment and several uses I noticed that the energy of the battery seemed less and less from where it would have been had I been using a Canon model. Indeed, the battery was virtually drained after less than 10-15 minutes' use of the camera. To me this was/is unacceptable.
Stay away from this product. At best, it is only a below average secondary battery, at worst is is a wattage-wasting energy loser.
A. Nathaniel Wallace, Jr.
After replacing the gear inside the camera, the camera proceeded to commit suicide. All pictures are severely underexposed and not as sharp as they should be, there's a tiny spec of dust on the CCD on every photo. It's a pitty, because I could work around the "not as sharp" problem, if Canon had bothered to include a manual focus feature. But no, of course they didn't.
This camera has no redeeming features for the price. You cannot set the exposure time any lower than around 3 seconds. The battery life is absolutely terrible and the camera goes through AA's like nobody's business. The lens design isn't what I would call best in class, and therefore the color depth on photos sucks. DO NOT BUY THIS CAMERA!!! Buy a Lumix instead. For around the same price, you get a much better camera that will last a long time. This camera was a complete disappointment and I wish my parents never spent the money to buy it.
If you're going to use it indoors and as a video for parties, etc, it will be fine. Buy with caution and don't be surprised if you're disappointed!! Previous reviewers I can't vouch for their 5 star reviews...maybe they haven't been outside??
Was about to go on a 8 day trip back east, excited about the pictures I would be taking.
I thought I might check out the camera; you know, clean the lens, add new batteries and such.
Started the camera up, and viola, "Lens Error Restart Camera".
User manual says if restarting the camera does not resolve the problem, contact Customer Support.
I tried all the things that people have suggested on the web, to no avail.
I saved up a long time for this camera, and now this.
I WILL NOT BUY ANY Canon products as long as they refuse to admit that they have a problem, and offer to repair it for free.
And Canon should know that I will pass this problem along to friends and family, and anyone else that I see at Best Buy looking at cameras.
If you are considering this camera, DON'T ! The pictures it took weren't all that great anyways; always seems soft and slightly out of focus. I think this could have been an effect of this problem all along.
Try the Nikon or some other camera.
This also helps save battery life, which is also quite good on this camera with a single pair of rechargeable, NiMH AA batteries lasting a full day of shooting.
The resolution of this camera (7 Megapixels) is adequate, though you probably wouldn't want to print any big posters off of it. We have higher res cameras for use when not on the road.
The waterproof digital cameras still have not reached the capability of cameras like this one yet, and all come with huge price tags for the waterproof feature. We didn't want to spend too much in case the camera gets dropped or banged up while out on the road.
All in all, a very good value for the price.
The Canon SX 10 IS is a excellent choice if you don't have the money for DSLR. I am still learning and this camera is certainly a great one to learn with because you have many of the functions of a good DSLR. The Auto mode works really well and you can get away with most shots by simply point and shoot. But for the shots that you cant pull of in Auto you have the ability to go full Manual Which i love. There are way too many great functions on this camera for me to list. I didn't buy this camera for the video but the video is fantastic as well. I was actually shocked the first time i the recorded a practice session of my friends band, the audio and video quality are truly awesome. The SX 10 really is the one of the closest things you can get to DSLR without having to spend thousands of dollars.
A lot of people seem to think that you can't use lens filters with the SX10, but they couldn't be more wrong. Just google Lensmate SX 10. I got the Lensmate Adapter 58mm, Hoya UV filter 58mm, an extra Lens Cap 58mm to fit the UV filter, and a Hoya HMC Circular Polarizer 58 mm and a few other goodies. I leave the Lensmate Adapter and the UV filter on the SX10 at all times to protect the main lens. This is the perfect addition. You can have a lot of fun with a Cir Polarizer. They are very useful for Landscape Photography because they help make the skies blue and the clouds white as they should be. The Polarizer is also great for taking the reflections off of water or glass.
My only complaint with this camera is Canon or actually Myself. I bought this camera about a month ago and about two weeks later Canon sent me an email saying that the Canon Powershot SX 20 was about to be released. That really struck a nerve ha. I really don't know how they could improve this model very much but i would have definitely loved to have had a heads up about the new SX 20 IS. Oh Well i guess that's what i get for not doing more research. I am certainly very happy with the SX 10. And with this model i can use the Canon Powershot SX10 IS CHDK Hack to unlock many more functions and capabilities such as RAW Image Format, Time Lapse, Remote Shutter Release, Motion detection, Bracketing, DOF Calculator, ETC ETC.
This was my first purchase from Amazon.com and i am extremely satisfied with Amazon. I ordered this camera late in the afternoon around 3:00pm or 4:00pm on a Thursday and it was at my house by 4:00pm Friday, ready for the weekend abuse.
The Canon Powershot SX 10 IS is an excellent choice for beginner as well as advanced photographers. The Quality and Functionality of this camera greatly out weigh the cost. I would recommend the Canon SX 10 to anybody looking for an excellent all in one type of camera. Go ahead and pick one up you won't be disappointed.
The card arrived promptly as promised and was well packaged.
It is an excellent product and it will not run out of memory when I cycle
through France in the summer.
Oh ! and it was a good price too.
excellent camera for the beginners..or like me..who do not tech-savvy but..simple clear ..exactly..to the point..want to take a photo..then just click...:)
My toddler son like the lens opening sound.and start posing for me...for someone it may be a bit noisy..But I like it overall.
Pros:
Basically indestructible
quite a bit of memory
Cons:
Terrible inside photos
Heavy!
Horrible video quality (grainy and orange)
Little options
Takes a long time to take a picture
Over all this camera really sucks! I have no idea why anyone would give this 5 stars. Polaroid photos are better then this piece of crap!
Biggest problem is the focus. I aim, press the button halfway down to focus etc, then watch as the camera focuses properly, then cry as it just keeps on adjusting until it's way out of focus. This is especially noticeable when using zoom for far shots. They just don't end up viewable.
Next problem is this: when I try a night shot using an external light source, like a flashlight, the image on the screen looks fine, bright and all, but when it takes the shot, the picture ends up too dark to see.
I have owned each of the previous models for the past 5 years at least, and have enjoyed each one, and appreciated the advances in technology. I even have the dslr xsi, and will probably get the next replacement for the a1000, but I hate the way this one has degraded over time.
Get one, use it couple years, toss it or take it apart to see the hamsters inside.
I go to alot of sporting events. NHL, NFL, MLB games. My seats are usually in the upper level. Though this is a great vantage point for watching the game, its not exactly the best for taking good, close pictures of the game. Well, the amazing zoom on this camera takes care of that! I can zoom in right on a player on the ice and point and shoot a great shot. The image stabilization is great and eliminates the headaches out of what should be fun photography. Whether I want to take a close shot of a specific player, zoom in a bit on some action or take a nice panoramic shot of my view in the arena, this camera does it all!
The video on this camera is also great. It is near-HD quality and a great substitute for a camcorder for most things that you would want to record, provided that you have a high capacity memory card.
Battery drain is not that bad with this camera. I only use rechargeable AA batteries and they rarely ever die during a good hour or more of picture or movie capturing. I always carry an extra set of AA's with me, but I rarely need them.
I haven't really gone thorough all of the settings, I just set my camera for what works for me, wet it to 'favorite' mode and just let it roll. Whether it's a hockey game, a party, a night out, or needing to take good pictures of items to sell on ebay, this camera does the job!
5/5
My previous camera was a 12 X zoom, Dimage Z3, which I enjoyed for 4+ years, but was never totally happy with the image quality, especially for photographing wildlife/birds. But, in its day, was the longest zoom in a non-SLR digital camera, so, I was happy enough for the price.
My dilemma recently was on whether to go for a "bridge" or SLR. I have always liked Canon cameras, so my first filter to narrow down the thousands available, was to mainly concentrate on the Canon range. I'm sure you could buy just as well, if your choice was Nikon, Sony, Pentax or other respected names.
So my otions were SX10 IS, SX1 IS, EOS400D, EOS450D, EOS 50D.
If I bought an EOS (SLR) then I would also have to buy extra, long lenses and do without video. The lenses were going to be expensive for good ones. According to many reviews I read, the standard lenses are no better than the quality on the SX1 IS. You can get non IS lenses by Sigma and others for reasonable price. But to get anyhwere near the zoom range of the SX1 I was going to have to spend big bucks.
There is also the inconvenience of having to carry a big bag around with me, like I used to with film SLR's. So I went for convenience.
On a balance between quality, price and convenience, I opted for the SX1 IS, which is a big step up from my old 4 mega pixel 12 times zoom.
So far (about 3 weeks) I am happy with the picture quality, though I still can't get as near to my subjects as I would like.
The long zoom is great, and the image stabilisation.
The ability to zoom whilst videoing is also a great new feature for a digicam.
Things I don't like are
1. Lens cap is not attached to camera by a cord, so it's easy to misplace, and doesn't always get put back on the idle camera. So I am risking damage.
2. The HD video has been a big disappointment. The video quality and size are great, but when you are panning, even slowly, the picture jumps. Do have a look on Youtube, for sample videos, if this is important to you.
Also, more importantly in my case, the video and sound are not in sync. I video singer/guitarist songs to put on Youtube, and they are not even in sync on my own PC, so I would have been okay to have bought the SX10, as HD video was my reason for upgrade. The standard quality video is good. I did have to get a new faster card to handle HD video. Sandisk Extreme 3. As far as I know this card is as fast as you can get?
UPDATE 16th Feb 09 - I now believe that all my issues with the HD video were caused by my own ignorance of this format. Canon reccommend 2.6 gig duo core minimum with Vista. My processor is only 2.13Ghx 2 core. So I'm still learning how to get the best out of it.
The video experts rave about the video quality of this camera, so I would take their word for it.
The Sandisk eXtreme card is a class 6 card and is suitable.
3. There is NO SCREW THREAD ON THE LENS!!! You cannot fit filters to protect the lens, or use effects. You can't add teleconverters to extend the zoom range. Although I realise that Canon would consider the extra weight impracticable as it would put extra strain on the motor drive.
UPDATE 15th Feb 09 - A company called Lensmate now make a suitable adaptor for the SX1 which bayonets on to the lens hood fitting and accepts standard 58mm (YES 58)filters.
4. You cant select the low ISO numbers, when you shoot in auto.
To get my photos as crisp as possible I like to use ISO 80. The camera never seems to select 80 in auto, even in bright sunlight, so I have started to use program and manual settings where I can select 80.
Overall, at the moment I still really like the camera, and am very happy that I chose it.
My son is going to get the EOS 450D soon, so I will see what the comparisons are like, first hand.
I hope I'm not going to be envious.
Good luck in your hunt for your ideal camera. Tony
Updated 30.01.09
My issues with video lag and sound sync above have been sorted, please see comments below this review. All part of the learning process.
Battery: Battery life seemed a bit weak to me. This camera uses AAs so I bought the Energizer Ultra Lithiums. They're pricey but they're good batteries. I did not count my shots but I did use the flash on about 30 out of about 100-120 photos before the batteries were nearly done.
Controls: The controls seemed fairly intuitive to me. This camera uses a wheel the change modes but also to access the "view pics" mode. My Nikon has a separate button to access "view pics". So do some of the Sony's. Personally, I prefer that but that is more of a preference than anything.
LCD: the LCD is good I have not used it outside in bright light yet. But be aware that w/o a viewfinder, the LCD is the only means you have for properly framing your subject matter.
Size and feel: the camera is a little bulky at 1 5/8" thick but the overall size and buttons should be conducive to comfortable use by any size hands, small lady or large man.
Connectivity: on one end of the camera there are 3 interfaces:
1. DC in, presumable for use with an optional (not provided) power supply;
2. USB works well. Simply put the camera in "view pics" mode and plug it in and you can either do your thing in the Canon software (which I have not/will not do) or simply access them via Windows Explorer.
3. A/V - a single proprietary 1/8" mini pluag into the camera produces a single composite video RCA/M plug and a single monaural RCA/M audio plug to connect to a TV or VCR or DVR.
Picture Quality: This was probably my greatest disappointment. I expected that a 3.5 year newer and 40% greater resolution (7.1MP vs 5.1MP) would have given me greater clarity and detail. Usually with electronics as the months go by, yesterdays "cutting edge" becomes tomorrow's "plain vanilla". That was not the case for me with this particular item. I still prefer to use my old Nikon, with the now broken battery door (thanks to the unconfessed sin of one of my 4 precious children), for capturing important moments.
I'm going to stop here because this is (currently) a $100 7.1MP Canon camera. Not deserving of being "picked to pieces". For $100 it's a pretty decent little unit. I have to think this is a whole lot better than some of the other full-featured, sub-$100 cameras out there. Just be aware that it is not on par with (probably any) $250 point and shoot. Be aware that the specs and the brand do not dictate the quality or performance of the camera. In fact, hands-on experience will demonstrate that quality and performance of particular features/functions of cameras will vary from model-to-model, regardless of brand, specs and price.
As I finish writing this review I think that perhaps this camera may deserve a 4-star rank, if it is being compared to other low-price cameras but since I have only used mid-range digital P&S cameras I cannot make that determination. As a digital P&S in general I can only give it 3 stars. I hope this is clear enough and helps someone with their purchase decision.
Modes used: I shot most pictures using the "P" mode which allows some manual settings such as ISO, white balance, flash strength, and exposure adjustment. The remainder I shot in manual mode.
What I liked: The old S2IS often took a long time to lock focus. This camera focuses very quickly allowing me to get a lot of "just now" shots. The image stabilizer, like the one in the S2IS was phenominal. With still subjects, I could consistently get clean, well focused shots at 1/8 second, and I have a slight hand tremor. Sometimes I could get good shots at slower shutter speeds. This really helped indoors where flashes were not permitted, or the subjects were distant. It also helped a lot at night. Another huge feature is the range of the lens. It goes from slightly telephoto at 28mm to 560 mm (20X zoom). I was able to get shots of things I could hardly see with my naked eye. I was also able to get close ups at great distance. Many of my best shots were at high zoom. With dslr's you often have to change lenses and these shots would have been missed. The manual settings were generally easy to use and really expanded the pictures we could shoot. Generally, I used shutter priority. I really liked the electronic viewfinder. It saves battery power and accurately shows how a shot will be exposed. It also has a diopter adjustment. The flip out and twist tilt screen was also a help with crowd shots. The flash was strong and can be enhanced. In addition, there is a "hot shoe" for an add on flash. I did not have an add on flash, but I can see how it would be useful in lower light conditions. I discovered there is a "mute" button on the top left that suppresses all noise. This is handy when you can't be obtrusive. To turn sounds back on, you have to go into the menu. Battery life was also very good. I used rechargable nmh batteries that when fully charged would handle the almost 200 shots per day without indicating much use on the battery level indicator. Overall the camera provided well focused and well exposed shots in a variety of conditions, with plenty of adjustments and clever features.
What could be better: Occasionally the autofocus would be fooled in low light or with objects intervening between me and the subject. I would revert to the manual focus mode, but it was a little awkward to use. In shutter priority mode, you spin a wheel on the back of the camera to adjust shutter speed. The change in shutter speed did not respond predictably to my thumbing of the wheel. Not a major problem, but I noticed it. In cloudy lighting (much of our trip in December) some shots were a bit overexposed in "P" mode inducing me to use shutter priority. To be fair the shots would often consist of brighter sky, and darker buildings. The camera does have several exposure algorithms to choose, but I stayed with the default. And since this is a point and shoot, and not a dslr, shooting at higher ISO's resulted in somewhat grainy pictures. The highest ISO I used was 800, sometimes at night and sometimes in caves so the "noise" was not all that relevant to the picture quality.
I gave the camera 4 stars because it was excellent, but not perfect.
Update June 17, 2009: I have happily used this camera for family and school events since my last review and I am very pleased. I also shot an Ultimate Frisbee tournament that my son participated in and was held indoors. With indoor lighting, I was not able to capture very many good shots, even when overiding shutter speed settings and shooting at 800 ISO. I ended up taking most of the pictures using a dSLR from my son's school newspaper. There was a world of difference in quality. The better sensor of the dSLR was able to handle the lower light with no problem. I am still very pleased with the SX10IS, its fine overall picture quality, and many features, but recognize the limitations of its point and shoot sensor.
I would consider this camera a step up from a lot of others in the price range. Along with the scene modes (which is pretty standard on most point and shoots anyway) it has a manual setting, which is fun to play around with and really easy to navigate. For someone like me who is still learning all the technical stuff it's a good first camera. You can customize a fair amount but its not overwhelming and hard to learn. At my job we are trained on what are the best selling points, features, etc, and whereas I take that into mind I also know that everyone is picky in their own way and some people care about certain features more than others. Personally I just wanted something to use on vacations, to take pictures of friends and I, my cats, etc. If you want something for fast action scenarios, sporting events and the like, you might want to skip this camera. It's only got the standard 3.4 optical zoom, which really is not that far, and even though it zooms farther digitally...it will get more blurry the further in you go. That is one thing Canon needs to improve upon-- a lot of their lower end models like this one have poor image stabilizing.
Canon's face detection technology is pretty cool though. In Auto mode (and probably manual too, I'm not positive though) it actually locks onto a person's face and almost highlights it...like zooms just their face in so you can see if it's clearly focused before taking the pic. This is a feature you can turn on or off in the Menu settings. It throws you off a bit in relation to the rest of the photo, but once you get the hang of it it's really helpful (in group shots especially.)
Bottom line - great deal for the price! You see a lot of Nikon's (Coolpix series) in the $89-129 price range, but in my experience this newer Canon definitely surpasses them. I had a Nikon Coolpix 5600 (probably about 2 yrs old now), and whereas it took beautifully sharp photos, the lag time was incredibly slow and that's what made me like this Canon better. Faster shutter times make all the difference! Canon's photo software is easier to navigate as well, with more custom settings to play around with when you want to edit/share your pictures on your computer. Most people are surprised to learn what kind of camera I have after they've seen the photos it takes. I just think its really nice that you can get something of this quality for such a low price.
OH- And a note about the AA batteries for this Canon: Obviously if you use standard alkaline AA's your response time is going to be a lot slower. Investing in good quality rechargeables is more than worth the money, it makes all the difference. I myself prefer Energizer's Lithium batteries, the blue and silver ones, as oppose to the rechargeables...just because they are specially designed for high powered devices like digital cameras, and you don't have to mess around with a charger, or the whole rotating batteries in and out. I got a good couple months of use out of a set of two, while taking pictures frequently...on a trip, and even just in everyday daily use. It's ab
This takes good pictures and has a bunch of different modes, however I was never able to take a decent shot in low-light conditions - probably since it's not SLR.
We got a lot of great family photos out of it, on our various vacations over the years so not a total loss, but I thought Canon was better quality.
Bad:
We've had this camera for about 3 years. Ever since we received it, it has eaten batteries constantly - for example, we'd put in new batteries, take a couple of shots, put the camera away and try to take pictures a couple of days later and the batteries would be dead, as if it drained them when it wasn't even turned on. We tried regular all different types of AA size batteries and it always drained them. Now the flash is dead, so it's a paper-weight. We purchased extra lenses, cleaning kit, carry case, filter kit, etc. for the camera, and now it's all collecting dust.
Will go with Nikon or another more-photography-centric brand next time and probably move to SLR for better capabilities.
so why do I see it priced at over $400 now???
I'm not sure, but this IS a great little camera. It does far more than I'll ever ask it to, and yet when I have time to browse the owner's manual, it's easy enough to try out different settings. I'm continuously amazed at the quality of images this camera puts out.
But I just don't get the price increase. Scary.
This time I was ready for a more DLSR camera and shooting experience. I was hesitant to invest thousands of dollars like I had with a film based DLSR years ago. One of the things that lead me to get this camera was that I remembered I did not often use my DLSR since it was a logistical hassle bringing all the lens, flashes, and equipment around. Once I realized this self truth, I looked to see what my options were. So when I saw the impressive specs on this camera, I had to try it out. Good choice on my part.
I could not believe how much of a powerful and clear zoom lens this camera has! This camera is pretty fast in terms of frames/second and startup time for such an "entry level" camera.
The macro capability was quite impressive, as was the depth of field capabilities. These were two features that I was missing in other point and shoots, and I could not be happier with the quality in this camera.
Dark environments are usually well captured, and I find that most pictures in the 400-800 ISO range to be quite usable as long as there is reasonable room lighting and no extremes of motion.
An added bonus was the video camera with stereo sound. I did not buy the camera for this feature, but I was delighted to find it so excellent. It easily equals my old Sony DV camera in all ways except night vision capability.
Unfortunately, my wife tended to use it so much that I felt she should have it. I bought a replacement camera that did not work out quite as well as this Canon PowerShot SX10 IS camera. Even though the replacement (Nikon Coolpix P90)was similar in feature sets and functionality. The Nikon P90 is a very nice camera, but having both in our household, I just like the Canon considerably better.
I ended up buying another PowerShot SX10 IS to replace my replacement Nikon P90. After using this Canon camera for awhile after using the Nikon, I will simply state that I am a full=fledged Canon enthusiast.
Reasons I like it (and why I think it is better than my Nikon Coolpix P90):
* Better (and more natural) clarity and color
* When using auto-focus, I find the pictures quite Good!
* The telephoto can be used in all lighting environments (even if it is grainy at high ISOs)
* The macro feature is really tremendous
* Stunned by how good the NTSC 640 x 480 video and sound is (just wish it was HD)
* Slightly more intuitive menus and functionality
* Better flexibility with LCD screen (though the Nikon is a nicer screen)
* Much fewer blurry pictures in various manual modes and/or auto modes
* Image stability function is better on this camera
This is one person's impression. Is it a perfect camera? No, but I truly believe that the Canon PowerShot SX10IS is a truly GREAT camera for new or experienced photographers, who want good flexibility, convenience, and excellent image results.
When it gets RAW capability and true HD video (1080p) then it will be perfect (for me) and called the "Canon PowerShot SX30IS", or the Canon PowerShot SX1 IS minus $100.
The supermacro is useful for flowers and still insects. I have managed some passable photos of birds and butterflies but the viewfinder makes it extremely difficult to check focus so it is a bit hit and miss.
Landscapes are fairly bright as jpgs but I tend to shoot RAW - that was the ultimate selling point.
With a low iSO of 80 it is superb for snowy landscapes and I have sold one image taken with it to a card company. Exposure compensation is easy to use and the image preview has the ability to show the histogram - all useful for the snow.
The only downside is that it eats batteries, on a recent trip to Austria the rechargables I took ran out after about 10 shots - they where fully charged before I left the UK. High power AA's lasted about 200 shots.
Then my neighbor told me about the Canon he got on Amazon. I bought it, and have never regretted it. The pictures are great, and I am truly camera challenged.
I took it on our recent cruise to Alaska and got some awesome shots, even a picture of a black bear in the bushes near me.
Also got some wonderful early morning shots coming in to port in Ketchikan, Alaska with lights twinkling in the old church and in the hills.
Also, does not take expensive batteries, and I do not have to plug it in to recharge. A great bonus, I did not have with expensive camera I had in the past.
Sherry
This is not a good camera for videos. One reason is the inability to focus while zooming during a video. The other reason is much more subtle. Some brilliant enginner put a "compact" video mode that one can easily switch to -- from hi res - just by turning the thumbwheel one quarter turn while in video shooting mode. This is very easy to do by accident and without noticing. The display resolution doesn't change much if you do this. You only see it after you upload your videos to your computer and find they are all fuzzy until you reduce the video window to a little tiny box. I ran off several videos and found later they were in ultra-low res and viewable only as a tiny box.
Now my wife returns from taking our kids camping, and I find that all but one of the videos she shot were in low res because she accidentally in haste bonked the thumwheel -- which surrounds the "set" button that is frequently used. The only indicator is a little envelope in the corner of the screen, which is not self explanatory and often not visible in the sun anyway when you're outside. What a stupid design.
-----------------------
The camera meets a specific need in our family, and that is as a simple and rapidly deployable "grab and go" camera for recording cute stuff the kids do at school and on field trips.
I already owned a Canon S3/IS camera (currently the S10/IS) which is well over $300 and vastly superior in several ways, but it has one major flaw and that is its thick profile. It's a bulky camera. You can't just stuff it into any pocket or purse or in a jacket.
I figured that I was missing a good amount of recordable cuteness because my wife wouldn't grab the big fat S3/IS and take it with her, so I bought her this slim and not quite so capable camera with essentially the same menus and controls as its bigger brother.
Now my wife grabs it and takes it places and I get more pictures and movies of the kids for our archives. What a great age to be a parent.
Here's what I particularly like.
1. The big screen on the back.
2. Face detection.
3. 30 fps DVD resolution movie capability.
4. Just plain takes good pictures.
5. High Capacity SD chip compatibility.
6. Skinny even with the AA batteries.
7. AA batteries! I really hate having to remember to charge proprietary little batteries. You have to have at least two so you can use one while the other is charging, and they eventually become useless and you have to replace them. I love buying AA batteries in bulk, using them, and throwing them away. Bwa ha ha ha ha!
Now the stuff I don't like
1. It can't auto focus while zooming and shooting a movie. I don't know that any camera at this price point does. The big brother S10/IS probably excels at this because my S3/IS sure does. I miss that capability in this camera.
2. Can't shoot around corners or hold the camera at weird angles because the LCD is in the back of the camera and does not flip out and swivel. I can't hold this thing over my head and shoot down.
3. Chews up the batteries faster than the larger Canon, understandably, and takes longer to ready the flash than the larger Canon does.
4. And, a nitpick that really bugs me. The SD card and the battery compartment are behind the same little door, which is on there really tight and it's a pain to have to open the battery compartment just to pop out the SD card, which I do way more often than swapping batteries because my PC has a card drive built in and transfers several GIG in a few seconds when I plug a card into it.
So, if you want a LCD on a pivot, or you really want your digital camera to double as a camcorder, by all means spend the extra money to get the higher end camera. If you want a "grab and go" camera that's a cut above many of the little tiny silver things that so many people seem to be in love with, try this one.
If you want a nice point and shoot that does not give you trouble buy this.
Battery? you can buy any battery AA and you be set... you can be anywhere and get those batteries. Get the ones that are special for small electronics .... those last a looooot.
Only thing is that the camera is a bit slower in the dark. but is alright. this camera is not supposed to be for professionals.
I got this camera to replace my lost Nikon Coolpix (which I also loved). I was looking for a good quality camera that would take clear pictures, but had allot of useful features. I have been using it more and more now that I'm really getting into photography. This is the perfect camera if you are looking for clear good quality pictures, but like to keep things a little simpler. I was having fun taking pictures in sepia and black and white instead of having to change them on iPhoto. And the zoom is also very good.
The only thing I can complain about is the short battery life. Though mine dosen't usually run out in a couple of days, it will usually noly last a month or so (even if i'm not taking pictures every single day).
It could also be inproved with a viewfinder.
Other than that I am positivly thrilled with this camera.
- «
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 101
- 102
- 103
- 104
- 105
- 106
- 107
- 108
- 109
- 110
- 111
- 112
- 113
- 114
- 115
- 116
- 117
- 118
- 119
- 120
- 121
- 122
- 123
- 124
- 125
- 126
- 127
- 128
- 129
- 130
- 131
- 132
- 133
- 134
- 135
- 136
- 137
- 138
- 139
- 140
- 141
- 142
- 143
- 144
- 145
- 146
- 147
- 148
- 149
- 150
- 151
- 152
- 153
- 154
- 155
- 156
- 157
- 158
- 159
- 160
- 161
- 162
- 163
- 164
- 165
- 166
- 167
- 168
- 169
- 170
- 171
- 172
- 173
- 174
- 175
- 176
- 177
- 178
- 179
- 180
- 181
- 182
- 183
- 184
- 185
- 186
- 187
- 188
- 189
- 190
- 191
- 192
- 193
- 194
- 195
- 196
- 197
- 198
- 199
- 200
- 201
- 202
- 203
- 204
- 205
- 206
- 207
- 208
- 209
- 210
- »






