Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
10040 отзывов пользователей о Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
Пользовались
Canon PowerShot SX160 IS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Синтрон-5RIKK
18.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
very good product, it is usefull and I recibed in perfect condition, i recomend for other costumers this item, very good.
Вектрон-8JRNA
02.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I received the Canon PowerShot SX160 as a gift from my husband. I am a novice, but my this camera is easy to use and produces great pictures with mostly automatic settings.
Сириус-4JSXJ
14.11.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I've been looking for a lens cover and no one sells them in the stores! I noticed one reviewer wrote that the strap wasn't long enough. It is definitely long enough for the SX20 IS. It's perfect for my camera. I looped the string leash around the camera strap and it fits perfectly. Now I won't lose it like the one that comes with the camera.
ТерраБот-5KMLB
31.12.2012
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
The camera was much bigger than I thought it would be and the camera requires two AA batteries for power. I would have preferred a rechargeable one cell battery for the camera
Кронос-5AMKD
04.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
For the price does what I want. Takes great pictures. It's light, easy to carry and point and shoot. The only drawback is that it uses batteries like crazy.
Пандорец-8NNDD
09.01.2013
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
This sock has a very good quality and fits perfectly with your canon camera but you could consider another type of case for more protection.
Синтрон-1DAMV
31.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
After buying one of these for myself, I was so impressed, I purchased one for the children. The pics and video is fantastic quality - especially considering the price!
Плазмоид-7XITP
02.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I love the price, the quality of the pictures, the compactness which makes it easy to always have in my purse. Excellent buy for the quality and technology
Астероид-8MTCZ
14.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I'm Happy with this cam, the zoom is amazing and the LCD display is great. For this price is a great alternative.
Эксопилот-5QCBH
03.01.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Just a little different from the other Canon's i have had in the past, but other than that, a great compact camera with fantastic clarity of picture
Дроид-1CGOQ
06.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Considering that I am technically challenged, this is the best camera for me. It is foolproof and it takes great pics!!! I love it!! It's not too big to lug around & the "auto" setting takes all the guesswork out of taking a wonderful picture.
Небулоид-2RRVG
28.02.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I'm basically a point and shoot guy, but I have enjoyed changing camera settings and dabbling a little bit in taking pictures of individual tropical fish in my aquarium, which is somewhat of a chore. Last year I bought a Sony H7 to replace my Canon A85. Though I could get good fish pictures after much reading and fiddling around, I was terribly disappointed and frustrated by the Sony's inability to take good indoor pictures using the automatic settings. I always had to go through the long process of editing the brightness and color of my pictures and even then was not always happy. I now have the Canon SX110 and am very happy with it. Here's my take on a comparison of it to my old camera.
Things I really like about my Canon SX110 compared to my Sony H7 and others . . .
1. Blur check feature on playback setting
2. The mode dial doesn't get accidentally turned as easy and mess up my pictures!!!!
3. The auto setting puts out better picture color in florescent light than the Sony did!!!
4. The auto setting chooses a lower ISO (200 vs 400) in low light giving less grainy pictures than the Sony!!
5. The view screen is bigger and has more pixels making it easier to tell if my printed results will be satisfactory!!
6. Image stabilization seems to work better than with the Sony
7. This camera is small enough to carry on my belt, in my coat pocket, or in my wife's purse
8. The cheaper price (counting a case, batteries, and cards, I spent $220 versus around $300
9. The lense cover is automatic instead of having to remember to take it off and put it on.
10. The manual settings are more easily navigated- e.g.the 2 click process to change ISO or face detection
11. Ability to erase a picture with two button pushes rather than three
12. The Program mode will hold it's settings even if you have changed the ISO, aperature, or shutter speed while in Manual mode (I missed good pictures because the Sony changed settings across the board)
The few things I don't like about my Canon SX110 compared to my Sony H7 and others . . .
1. The flash does not pop up automatically
2. The flash does not recharge as quickly
3. The zoom is shorter
4. There is no neck strap, but instead just a wrist strap
5. The memory card is inside the battery compartment so batteries can easily fall out while removing the card.
Concerning the flash, I just have to get in the habit of putting it up like I had to get in the habit of taking off the lens cap with the Sony. If I forget, the camera does tell me. Concerning the recharge time, I have to live with that, but you can take a non flash picture while waiting and there is some benefit to being able to use AA Alkalines in a pinch and cheap rechargeables the rest of the time. Concerning the zoom, I have yet to miss it and can always cut and crop. When I did zoom the full 15x on my Sony it seemed I always had color output and exposure problems anyway. Concerning the lack of a neck strap, a good camera bag will have one and you can add one to your camera too if you can find one like I had from a Sandisk flash drive. Concerning the battery compartment, I've found it easiest to hook the camera to the computer using the USB cord that I just leave attached to the computer, and that's a small price to pay for the ease of getting good picture output. On the same note, it would have been nice if the cord attached to the camera on the side opposite the grip of the camera.
A few other features some may dislike or miss with the Canon vs the Sony
1. The battery life is shorter
2. There is no viewfinder to use in bright light or to help conserve battery power
3. The flash is not as powerful
But none of the above bother me in the least. It's easy to carry extra Nimh AA batteries and I never used the viewfinder with my Sony to begin with nor on the other digital camera I had before it. As for the flash, even though I envision that I would use the extra power occasionally and did try it a few times with the Sony, that occasion is too rare to worry about. I was never happy with Sony's "green" and grainy output in such circumstances, so that makes it easier not to miss. Besides, Canon does sell an add on flash that one can use with this camera if he sees a need for it.
A few other features some may like about the Canon versus the Sony
1. On the fly red eye removal
2. The well chosen scene setting selections available with the twist of the dial and others easily accessible
3. The more popular and universal SD memory card versus Sony's propriety MS Pro Duo card
4. The easy setting that requires no camera know how except to pop up the flash, point, and shoot
That does it for a review from the perspective of a simple point and shoot guy. I hope it can help someone make the choice that will best mee
Things I really like about my Canon SX110 compared to my Sony H7 and others . . .
1. Blur check feature on playback setting
2. The mode dial doesn't get accidentally turned as easy and mess up my pictures!!!!
3. The auto setting puts out better picture color in florescent light than the Sony did!!!
4. The auto setting chooses a lower ISO (200 vs 400) in low light giving less grainy pictures than the Sony!!
5. The view screen is bigger and has more pixels making it easier to tell if my printed results will be satisfactory!!
6. Image stabilization seems to work better than with the Sony
7. This camera is small enough to carry on my belt, in my coat pocket, or in my wife's purse
8. The cheaper price (counting a case, batteries, and cards, I spent $220 versus around $300
9. The lense cover is automatic instead of having to remember to take it off and put it on.
10. The manual settings are more easily navigated- e.g.the 2 click process to change ISO or face detection
11. Ability to erase a picture with two button pushes rather than three
12. The Program mode will hold it's settings even if you have changed the ISO, aperature, or shutter speed while in Manual mode (I missed good pictures because the Sony changed settings across the board)
The few things I don't like about my Canon SX110 compared to my Sony H7 and others . . .
1. The flash does not pop up automatically
2. The flash does not recharge as quickly
3. The zoom is shorter
4. There is no neck strap, but instead just a wrist strap
5. The memory card is inside the battery compartment so batteries can easily fall out while removing the card.
Concerning the flash, I just have to get in the habit of putting it up like I had to get in the habit of taking off the lens cap with the Sony. If I forget, the camera does tell me. Concerning the recharge time, I have to live with that, but you can take a non flash picture while waiting and there is some benefit to being able to use AA Alkalines in a pinch and cheap rechargeables the rest of the time. Concerning the zoom, I have yet to miss it and can always cut and crop. When I did zoom the full 15x on my Sony it seemed I always had color output and exposure problems anyway. Concerning the lack of a neck strap, a good camera bag will have one and you can add one to your camera too if you can find one like I had from a Sandisk flash drive. Concerning the battery compartment, I've found it easiest to hook the camera to the computer using the USB cord that I just leave attached to the computer, and that's a small price to pay for the ease of getting good picture output. On the same note, it would have been nice if the cord attached to the camera on the side opposite the grip of the camera.
A few other features some may dislike or miss with the Canon vs the Sony
1. The battery life is shorter
2. There is no viewfinder to use in bright light or to help conserve battery power
3. The flash is not as powerful
But none of the above bother me in the least. It's easy to carry extra Nimh AA batteries and I never used the viewfinder with my Sony to begin with nor on the other digital camera I had before it. As for the flash, even though I envision that I would use the extra power occasionally and did try it a few times with the Sony, that occasion is too rare to worry about. I was never happy with Sony's "green" and grainy output in such circumstances, so that makes it easier not to miss. Besides, Canon does sell an add on flash that one can use with this camera if he sees a need for it.
A few other features some may like about the Canon versus the Sony
1. On the fly red eye removal
2. The well chosen scene setting selections available with the twist of the dial and others easily accessible
3. The more popular and universal SD memory card versus Sony's propriety MS Pro Duo card
4. The easy setting that requires no camera know how except to pop up the flash, point, and shoot
That does it for a review from the perspective of a simple point and shoot guy. I hope it can help someone make the choice that will best mee
Аргонавт-6VRQT
02.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
It has many of the profesional features, like setting the time of the shut to get the most light as posible... its perfect for fans of photography
Гелиос-1ZILM
04.12.2012
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I ordered this as an upgrade to my older Canon PowerShot but it has less options and is bulkier. Also it takes bad action shots which is something I need in a camera. Also Amazon sent me the black one, not a major deal but now I can't return it.
Дроид-4XSYM
04.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Works well with my Canon PowerShot A-95. Extends the flash range considerably and is great for bouncing light to eliminate harsh shadows.
Астероид-0GZUG
06.01.2013
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
sorry, don't remember this purchase, might have been for my daughter. She has a different camera now, this was a couple years ago
Пульсар-4TKRG
06.01.2013
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
the battery killed this product! 4 AA really? 10 snaps and you need new batteries
i own 6 canon cameras this is the worst!
i own 6 canon cameras this is the worst!
Нейрон-2IPCA
27.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Bought this back in 2010 to replace a Fuji FinePix with 3.8MP and 6x optical zoom; this has been a great camera to take close up shots from a distance of wildlife
Пандорец-5VBXL
10.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This is a great camera with great features & a great lens at a great price. You won't go wrong with this product.
Вояджер-6JHIC
29.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I bought this camera to replace my old Canon powershot. So far this camera has exceded my expectations. Great price for a very nice easy to use camera.
МехаРейнджер-0JXAU
23.12.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
As far it's as good as I expected. I had more to learn for it and especially shooting in different mode than auto. Good sharp pictures, but in low light the quality fells.
Капеллан-3VJUW
20.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I had a Canon powershot for about 5 years, and I dropped it with the lens out, and it stopped working, so I bought this one. I love it, the zoom is clear, and it takes great video.
НеоВояжер-6ORUT
24.02.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
After much research I chose the SX1 (over SX10 or Panasonic FZ28) as a replacement for my A610.
Despite reading reviews, my first impression was that it was larger than expected... and perhaps a little heavier. Expectations are subjective of course, but this is no `pocket' camera! It's very solid (think `small DSLR' rather than `compact'), and though mainly plastic it's very well built. The lens surround is metal, and there's a metal tripod thread. It feels comfortable when held, and the weight should help avoid camera shake (as does excellent Image Stabilisation).
(Note - if you `rock' the camera gently whilst off there's a slight clunking noise, sounding like a loose item inside. You don't hear this when switched on. Apparently Canon say that it's perfectly normal. So don't be disconcerted!)
The second thing that stood out was the clarity of the display. The 2.8 inch screen is considerably larger than my A610's and very crisp and colourful. The viewfinder display is less impressive, but useable, but with the main screen so clear I'll probably use that more.
The 20x zoom lens is quite long when extended and reach is impressive. The lens cap is a pain - ideally it would be attached with a cord, but it can clip to the neck-strap. I miss an `automatic' lens cover but there you go.
If you've used another Canon compact you'll find the UI and menus familiar. There are many options to navigate, but all are accessed via a straightforward system, with `shortcut' buttons provided on the body (MF, ISO, Macro, Timer, Exposure compensation and a dedicated video record button which is really useful - no need to find video `mode' before filming). The widescreen display is used well with info neatly arranged to get the most from the space provided. In `normal' photo mode the image occupies the central area with settings shown on the right and left avoiding obscuring the image. Switch to widescreen mode for stills (and HD video) and the image then occupies the full width.
STILLS
The `$6 Million' question is how good is the image quality? I'd say very good.
Overall quality of picture in terms of sharpness, focus, colour, exposure and so on, is very good. In terms of `noise', from what I've seen the SX1 delivers generally good results. Initial tests were mainly indoors in natural light - a `worst case scenario' test. Generally the SX1 coped well and shots in brighter light are obviously better! Using `Auto' at mainly 100 or 200ISO shots were clean and tidy. At normal viewing resolution no real noise is visible. Zoomed to 2, 4 or even 6 megapixels images are fine and prints at 6x4, or perhaps even A4 size, should be fine.
At 100% the 10 megapixel indoor images do exhibit some `graininess'. However, this is probably `normal' for most 8+ megapixel compacts, which are pushing the limits of what a small sensor can achieve. With good light outdoors, I'm sure the SX1 is capable of producing superb shots, and at 10 megapixels opportunities are presented for cropping and enlarging.
Outdoor shots, despite dull weather, have come out very well. The zoom allows you to get in very close to subjects. Also, the wide angle (28mm) is great for group and indoor shots.
HD VIDEO
A large attraction of the SX1 is its Full HD video (1080p). With this the SX1 is something of a pioneer.
I shot several videos and converted to WMF using WinFF on my PC for smooth playback (see comments other review). With settings of 30000bps, 30fps, 1920/1080, the WMFs played back smoothly. Quality is superb - every bit as good as hoped for. Surprisingly, though Canon recommend Class 6, video worked fine with my Class 4 card (Sandisk Ultra II, 8Gb).
Indoors video came out fine, and though the SX1 can `overexpose' in bright light it is no worse than my `normal' camcorder.
One great thing is that you can grab 2 megapixel stills from the video. This is like having 30fps `burst mode' on the camera. Just convert to .wmv and via Windows Movie Maker you can save any frame as a JPG - perfect for 6x4 prints!
HD video is all I hoped it would be. Shoots fine, looks superb, CD quality sound, easily transferred to PC (no more `capturing' from tape) and with right software excellent results are achieved. It really does give you an HD camcorder in a stills camera. You'd want a good capacity card (16GB=56mins), but 16Gb are now available from about £20. The SX1 fits less video on a card than many HD camcorders, but there's a simple reason: Most HD camcorders encode at between 15 and 24Mbs - whereas the SX1 shoots at around 43Mbs!!.... And it shows!
EARLY CONCLUSIONS
The SX1 is a great, all-in-one, `bridge' camera. Well built, great zoom & wide angle, feels solid, takes good pictures, and superb video. With many features, manual controls, macro, 4fps burst mode, and so on, you get a lot for
Despite reading reviews, my first impression was that it was larger than expected... and perhaps a little heavier. Expectations are subjective of course, but this is no `pocket' camera! It's very solid (think `small DSLR' rather than `compact'), and though mainly plastic it's very well built. The lens surround is metal, and there's a metal tripod thread. It feels comfortable when held, and the weight should help avoid camera shake (as does excellent Image Stabilisation).
(Note - if you `rock' the camera gently whilst off there's a slight clunking noise, sounding like a loose item inside. You don't hear this when switched on. Apparently Canon say that it's perfectly normal. So don't be disconcerted!)
The second thing that stood out was the clarity of the display. The 2.8 inch screen is considerably larger than my A610's and very crisp and colourful. The viewfinder display is less impressive, but useable, but with the main screen so clear I'll probably use that more.
The 20x zoom lens is quite long when extended and reach is impressive. The lens cap is a pain - ideally it would be attached with a cord, but it can clip to the neck-strap. I miss an `automatic' lens cover but there you go.
If you've used another Canon compact you'll find the UI and menus familiar. There are many options to navigate, but all are accessed via a straightforward system, with `shortcut' buttons provided on the body (MF, ISO, Macro, Timer, Exposure compensation and a dedicated video record button which is really useful - no need to find video `mode' before filming). The widescreen display is used well with info neatly arranged to get the most from the space provided. In `normal' photo mode the image occupies the central area with settings shown on the right and left avoiding obscuring the image. Switch to widescreen mode for stills (and HD video) and the image then occupies the full width.
STILLS
The `$6 Million' question is how good is the image quality? I'd say very good.
Overall quality of picture in terms of sharpness, focus, colour, exposure and so on, is very good. In terms of `noise', from what I've seen the SX1 delivers generally good results. Initial tests were mainly indoors in natural light - a `worst case scenario' test. Generally the SX1 coped well and shots in brighter light are obviously better! Using `Auto' at mainly 100 or 200ISO shots were clean and tidy. At normal viewing resolution no real noise is visible. Zoomed to 2, 4 or even 6 megapixels images are fine and prints at 6x4, or perhaps even A4 size, should be fine.
At 100% the 10 megapixel indoor images do exhibit some `graininess'. However, this is probably `normal' for most 8+ megapixel compacts, which are pushing the limits of what a small sensor can achieve. With good light outdoors, I'm sure the SX1 is capable of producing superb shots, and at 10 megapixels opportunities are presented for cropping and enlarging.
Outdoor shots, despite dull weather, have come out very well. The zoom allows you to get in very close to subjects. Also, the wide angle (28mm) is great for group and indoor shots.
HD VIDEO
A large attraction of the SX1 is its Full HD video (1080p). With this the SX1 is something of a pioneer.
I shot several videos and converted to WMF using WinFF on my PC for smooth playback (see comments other review). With settings of 30000bps, 30fps, 1920/1080, the WMFs played back smoothly. Quality is superb - every bit as good as hoped for. Surprisingly, though Canon recommend Class 6, video worked fine with my Class 4 card (Sandisk Ultra II, 8Gb).
Indoors video came out fine, and though the SX1 can `overexpose' in bright light it is no worse than my `normal' camcorder.
One great thing is that you can grab 2 megapixel stills from the video. This is like having 30fps `burst mode' on the camera. Just convert to .wmv and via Windows Movie Maker you can save any frame as a JPG - perfect for 6x4 prints!
HD video is all I hoped it would be. Shoots fine, looks superb, CD quality sound, easily transferred to PC (no more `capturing' from tape) and with right software excellent results are achieved. It really does give you an HD camcorder in a stills camera. You'd want a good capacity card (16GB=56mins), but 16Gb are now available from about £20. The SX1 fits less video on a card than many HD camcorders, but there's a simple reason: Most HD camcorders encode at between 15 and 24Mbs - whereas the SX1 shoots at around 43Mbs!!.... And it shows!
EARLY CONCLUSIONS
The SX1 is a great, all-in-one, `bridge' camera. Well built, great zoom & wide angle, feels solid, takes good pictures, and superb video. With many features, manual controls, macro, 4fps burst mode, and so on, you get a lot for
Пульсар-7VWIO
06.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I really love Canon PowerShot, they are fantastic cameras. The price is worth and you have a great quality for the size.
Вояджер-3QESJ
03.12.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
This is the third PowerShot I've had (dropped and broke the other two!). I'm comfortable with it, and it does exactly what I want. It is slightly bulky, and the door over the battery/disk housing is fiddly, but apart from that it's great.
НаноРейдер-8NJND
06.11.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
We have had this camera for several years and it has been great! If this one ever breaks I am going to try to buy the same model again. The image quality is very good, and it has an orange LED light that allows it to focus in low light and complete darkness. Our Pentax waterproof camera does not have this, and as a result the Pentax has a horrible time focusing in low light conditions, but this Canon focuses great in the same conditions. The focus is also very fast. Also if you hold the shutter button half way down then it focuses, and then it will take a picture the instant you press the button all the way down. This is great for sports or shows where you know action is "about" to happen. You hold it half way to get focused, then press it all the way down the instant you want the picture and you get great pictures very easily. The macro feature also works well for taking very close pictures. The only negatives I have about this camera are related to the batteries; it runs on AA's and uses them up pretty quickly, and if you use regular alkaline batteries then the flash takes a little while to charge up. More expensive cameras will use lithium ion batteries which both last longer and charge the flash much faster, but that is a different price point of camera too. So if you're looking for an inexpensive camera, especially at the current price of $50 online, then this one is fantastic. The pictures are great, features are good and at this price you won't loose too much sleep if you break or loose it. I definitely recommend this for everyday snap shots!
Вектрон-0ZYSU
09.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I love the smaller size, also love it because you can put the date on your photoes, great price also
Сатурниан-1TARG
28.12.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
The only thing I dislike is the flash loading time and the waiting time between shots... but was a good purchase if you're not a pro. :)
ИнфраГость-0AVZT
29.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Good while it lasted,we used it well and it was a great buy then,technology has advanced now and we use some other canon camera more.
Гравитон-3PQCN
01.01.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
The battery just exhausts every hour. I am not sure why. otherwise pics are good. This camera is like-able. Thanks.
Аргонавт-5QBMA
29.12.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I just wanted the Lens Cap and its good. Its Fits for my SX20IS and also has "Canon" logo ...
Thanks -Vish
Thanks -Vish
Гравитон-3XBWK
24.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Takes awesome pics and movies even close up. No tripod needed! Easy to use but not pocket friendly. You need a camera bag but it is worth it!
Астероид-3MWGD
02.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Exactly what I was looking for. I bought several of these at once since I am always misplacing them. Thanks!
Спектр-3UDUP
27.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This was a gift for my grandson and he has been taking some wonderful photos with it. The shots rival those taken with my DSLR.
Гелиос-6YXZR
25.11.2011
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
This Cannon model was the first digital camera I ever bought. I decided to get a camera which used batteries because I was going on vacation and would not have my computer with me. Well, in retrospect, I would have opted for a camera with a charger that plugged into the wall. This camera drains batteries, especially when filming video. I've put in fresh high quality batteries, filmed a couple of videos and it tells me I need to replace the batteries. If I go anywhere I think I will film video, I always take at least 4 extra AA batteries along. Same with flash photography. Take a few photos and the battery icon starts flashing. It seems like it rips off the top of batteries, turns them upside down, and pours out all the juice. Another thing which happened is the view screen became out of focus. It looks like a TV screen back in the day when you could barely pick up a station using an antenna. This just happened one day out of the blue. I don't know what caused it and it never improved. The photos and video still come out like they did before, but I always have to explain that if anyone uses my camera, because they think the photo didn't come out. Aside from the battery life and view screen issues, the pictures and videos are of excellent quality and it is pretty easy to use even for someone like myself who was used to the old school, film-loading cameras. I finally decided to get a new camera because I didn't want to spend anymore money on 16 packs of AA batteries.
Синтрон-7EWFI
27.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I love taking pictures with my new camera! and the video quality is amazing as well!I would definitely recommend this camera!
Интеллектор-0TSAG
03.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I adore this camera.We have a bigger better shinier zoomier more expensive canonas well,but I always choose to use this one for videos especially and the macro is more than the average photographer would need.
МехаРейнджер-3UCSO
17.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I BOUGHT A BUNCH OF THESE AS SPARES TO HAVE CHARGED AND READY A FEW YEARS AGO WHEN I BOUGHT A CAM CORDER FROM AMAZON SITE ALSO..THEY STILL WORK AND HOLD CHARGE
КиберНаблюдатель-4TAOX
27.12.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I have this camera for over 6 months now and I like it. I am not much of a techie person and I can figure it out just fine.
Небулоид-2ZDRN
29.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
When I misplaced my charger, I went looking for a replacement and found this battery at a great price bought it too.
НаноРейдер-7BVFJ
25.12.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Great camera for the price. Easy to use. Great pictures. Uses Batteries fast. Great Zoom like the LCD display ...................
ТерраБот-9LHFG
28.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Great camera for the money I wanted to spend. The camera met all my expectations. Simple to use and very intuitative.
Альфа-Юнит-4CCIT
24.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Amazing camera with tons of features. I think this is the best camera under $400. Next step after this thats worth it is a rebel.
Капеллан-8IUPD
25.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Camera responds to thephotographer's snap! This replaced a camera with a malfunctioning battery cover . .... ... .... ... .
Спектроник-8CMEM
14.12.2012
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Even though I haven't used it yet, the appearance, the required size and material appear to be excellent.
It looks very similar to the batter it's replacing.
It looks very similar to the batter it's replacing.
Спектроник-8ZTBB
27.06.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I had originally considered getting either a Panasonic TZ7 or an Olympus mju9000 both of which have long zoom lenses (around ten times magnification) and similar numbers of pixels (about 10MP).
When I started checking the review sites I discovered that there seems to be an insurmountable optical problem when trying to combine a long zoom lens with an extremely compact body namely that the sensor has to be very small for the extreme telephoto image to fit onto it.
This naturally causes problems (such as horrendous barrel distortion) which are really to do with the laws of physics and therefore unavoidable.
The manufacturers try to get around it with a lot of post processing of the resulting image by the camera's electronics but it never really works that well. The picture quality always suffers.
I decided therefore to do without the long telephoto zoom.
If picture quality is your absolute priority then you may choose to do the same in which case this camera is probably the best available compact at the moment.
Personally I would have preferred a slightly wider angle minimum setting for the zoom although this will probably only be a problem if you're taking pictures indoors.
The quick shoot mode (using only the optical viewfinder) is exceptionally good and produces the most accurate exposures whilst also reducing power consumption. The Program mode is nearly as good.
It's worth playing about with the exposure metering options and the exposure compensation for a while to get the best combination.
The manual mode is not truly manual since it doesn't allow complete control over all parameters but it does give some choice and it's probably the best you're ever likely to get on a compact camera.
Full automatic tends to overexpose slightly for my taste - but then I suppose it's set to produce cheery holiday snaps rather than angst filled landscapes so most people may find it useful in most circumstances.
I haven't really bothered much with the various 'scene' modes which include things like 'fireworks', 'underwater' and even 'aquarium' (?!) which seems a bit esoteric.
The most useful of these is probably 'ISO 3200' which increases light sensitivity for night scenes but is predictably grainy.
If you want more detail about how it works I would strongly suggest that you go to the Canon website and download the user's manual BEFORE you buy - I think this is a good idea with any camera (or technical product of any kind for that matter).
In terms of appearance the camera is startlingly small especially if you're used to 35mm SLRs or even compact film cameras. Its quality of construction is excellent as are the materials. It's slightly heavier than I expected given its size.
I prefer the black finish - less conspicuous - (although it is available in silver) and the 'organic' curves.
The battery takes about an hour to charge and lasts well despite only being c.650mAh capacity. I thought I'd need a spare but probably won't.
The on/off button glows green when switched on and takes quite a firm push to operate which is a good idea since the motors extending and retracting the lens segments would probably be damaged if it tried opening in your pocket or a case as a result of a bump or accidental pressure.
The zoom ring surrounds the shutter release button and the whole arrangement is very neat.
The layout of the other controls and their method of operation is pretty typical except that the main mode selector control is a fairly stiff five position rotary switch rather than the usual cursor/display method of most cameras.
I found the LCD display (which protrudes slightly from the camera back) a little over-bright even at the minimum brightness setting but this was with indoor use, outdoors you probably wouldn't notice.
Because of the provision of an optical viewfinder the display is a little smaller than on other compacts but big enough to do what's necessary.
The optical viewfinder is more useful than you might expect (re. my comment above about 'quick shoot' mode).
Overall the pictures are of extraordinary quality and the camera is a beautiful piece of work.
If you're used to using 35mm SLRs then you'll probably appreciate this as a highly portable reserve to carry at all times.
I think Canon have got their priorities (i.e. picture quality v. gimmickry you probably won't use anyway) about right.
When I started checking the review sites I discovered that there seems to be an insurmountable optical problem when trying to combine a long zoom lens with an extremely compact body namely that the sensor has to be very small for the extreme telephoto image to fit onto it.
This naturally causes problems (such as horrendous barrel distortion) which are really to do with the laws of physics and therefore unavoidable.
The manufacturers try to get around it with a lot of post processing of the resulting image by the camera's electronics but it never really works that well. The picture quality always suffers.
I decided therefore to do without the long telephoto zoom.
If picture quality is your absolute priority then you may choose to do the same in which case this camera is probably the best available compact at the moment.
Personally I would have preferred a slightly wider angle minimum setting for the zoom although this will probably only be a problem if you're taking pictures indoors.
The quick shoot mode (using only the optical viewfinder) is exceptionally good and produces the most accurate exposures whilst also reducing power consumption. The Program mode is nearly as good.
It's worth playing about with the exposure metering options and the exposure compensation for a while to get the best combination.
The manual mode is not truly manual since it doesn't allow complete control over all parameters but it does give some choice and it's probably the best you're ever likely to get on a compact camera.
Full automatic tends to overexpose slightly for my taste - but then I suppose it's set to produce cheery holiday snaps rather than angst filled landscapes so most people may find it useful in most circumstances.
I haven't really bothered much with the various 'scene' modes which include things like 'fireworks', 'underwater' and even 'aquarium' (?!) which seems a bit esoteric.
The most useful of these is probably 'ISO 3200' which increases light sensitivity for night scenes but is predictably grainy.
If you want more detail about how it works I would strongly suggest that you go to the Canon website and download the user's manual BEFORE you buy - I think this is a good idea with any camera (or technical product of any kind for that matter).
In terms of appearance the camera is startlingly small especially if you're used to 35mm SLRs or even compact film cameras. Its quality of construction is excellent as are the materials. It's slightly heavier than I expected given its size.
I prefer the black finish - less conspicuous - (although it is available in silver) and the 'organic' curves.
The battery takes about an hour to charge and lasts well despite only being c.650mAh capacity. I thought I'd need a spare but probably won't.
The on/off button glows green when switched on and takes quite a firm push to operate which is a good idea since the motors extending and retracting the lens segments would probably be damaged if it tried opening in your pocket or a case as a result of a bump or accidental pressure.
The zoom ring surrounds the shutter release button and the whole arrangement is very neat.
The layout of the other controls and their method of operation is pretty typical except that the main mode selector control is a fairly stiff five position rotary switch rather than the usual cursor/display method of most cameras.
I found the LCD display (which protrudes slightly from the camera back) a little over-bright even at the minimum brightness setting but this was with indoor use, outdoors you probably wouldn't notice.
Because of the provision of an optical viewfinder the display is a little smaller than on other compacts but big enough to do what's necessary.
The optical viewfinder is more useful than you might expect (re. my comment above about 'quick shoot' mode).
Overall the pictures are of extraordinary quality and the camera is a beautiful piece of work.
If you're used to using 35mm SLRs then you'll probably appreciate this as a highly portable reserve to carry at all times.
I think Canon have got their priorities (i.e. picture quality v. gimmickry you probably won't use anyway) about right.
Спектроник-6XRRP
15.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Great Camera. Fantastic quality. Took it to Paris, France on vacation and never regretted it! Make sure to buy an extra battery so you never miss a shot!
НоваГость-8VITC
24.05.2012
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Well the good news is the lens cap fits securely onto my camera (Canon Powershot SX20IS) which is the only reason I gave this product a second star. However, the strap is a freaking joke!!!
Don't be fooled by the image which makes it appear as though the string leash strap loops through the lens cap and can be attached to your camera. The strap connects to the lens cap with a tiny rubber sticky tab, smaller then a dime. Even if I wanted to use a different strap, there isn't even a notch on the lens cap that it could be tied to/looped through.
Needless to say if I didn't need my lens cap for traveling next week, I would be returning it. Luckily I don't buy clothing without pockets and I also have a camera bag so I can put the lens cap somewhere safe without loosing it.
BOTTOM LINE: You get what you pay for; not much!
Don't be fooled by the image which makes it appear as though the string leash strap loops through the lens cap and can be attached to your camera. The strap connects to the lens cap with a tiny rubber sticky tab, smaller then a dime. Even if I wanted to use a different strap, there isn't even a notch on the lens cap that it could be tied to/looped through.
Needless to say if I didn't need my lens cap for traveling next week, I would be returning it. Luckily I don't buy clothing without pockets and I also have a camera bag so I can put the lens cap somewhere safe without loosing it.
BOTTOM LINE: You get what you pay for; not much!
Показаны отзывы 4041-4088 из 10040.
- «
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 101
- 102
- 103
- 104
- 105
- 106
- 107
- 108
- 109
- 110
- 111
- 112
- 113
- 114
- 115
- 116
- 117
- 118
- 119
- 120
- 121
- 122
- 123
- 124
- 125
- 126
- 127
- 128
- 129
- 130
- 131
- 132
- 133
- 134
- 135
- 136
- 137
- 138
- 139
- 140
- 141
- 142
- 143
- 144
- 145
- 146
- 147
- 148
- 149
- 150
- 151
- 152
- 153
- 154
- 155
- 156
- 157
- 158
- 159
- 160
- 161
- 162
- 163
- 164
- 165
- 166
- 167
- 168
- 169
- 170
- 171
- 172
- 173
- 174
- 175
- 176
- 177
- 178
- 179
- 180
- 181
- 182
- 183
- 184
- 185
- 186
- 187
- 188
- 189
- 190
- 191
- 192
- 193
- 194
- 195
- 196
- 197
- 198
- 199
- 200
- 201
- 202
- 203
- 204
- 205
- 206
- 207
- 208
- 209
- 210
- »
Похожие товары с лучшей оценкой
Wizemart © 2026.
Рекомендательная система по умному выбору товаров по отзывам и рейтингам
