Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
10038 отзывов пользователей o Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
Пользовались
Canon PowerShot SX160 IS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор




Firstly, Canon make a lot of the fact that it's got a good video function. This may well be true but if I'd wanted a video camera I'd have bought one. I want a still camera which can take the occasional video, not the other way round.
The camera supposedly allows you to take photo's in very poor light by using very high ISO values (up to obout 3200) and I suppose you might just about get a print the size of a postage stamp if you used it. If reasonable sized prints are all that is required ISO 800 is just about usable but the picture on my PC monitor becomes rather noisy at these speeds even after spending quite a time working with Photoshop on the image. ISO 200-400 is just about as high as I want to go and even 400 is a bit dodgy.
My last camera was a Fuji Finepix S7000 which eventually succumbed after many years of use. Like all digital cameras it had a viewing screen but, in bright light, this became almost unusable so I used the viewfinder instead. The image was absolutely first class and was far easier to use that the viewingf screen. On this camera the viewfinder is absolutely dreadful and is almost unusable. The swiveling viewing screen compensates for this to some extent but it is still very difficult to use in bright conditons.
The image stabilisation works very well and the zoom, or at least the optical zoom is excellent, but if you use the digital zoom the picture quality rapidly tails off.
I was amazed to find that a £400 camera didn't have a cable release screw. Instead they provide a radio controlled gadget which releases the shutter. I had a lot of trouble working out how this device worked as the manual-all 304 pages of it-which I had to print out myself -wasn't any too clear. I eventually tried contacting Canon, both by email and by phone. It was painfully clear THAT NONE OF THE PEOPLE I SPOKE TO HAD THE SLIGHTEST KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE CAMERA. I eventually solved the problem myself and none of their suggestions came even close to solving the question I'd asked.
Anyway, I eventually got the wireless control working but the sensor is on the front of the camera. This may well be OK if all you want it to take photo's of yourself, but I like photographing wildlife and just about the last thing you want to do is move your hand around when you're doing that. They could easily have put a sensor on the back as well but Canon don't seem to have given much thought to what a customer might want to use a complex camera like this for.
There are all sorts of picture taking programs on the camera but I really can't see much difference between most of them as far as picture taking is concerned. One thing I'm really annoyed about is the fact that there is no "Bulb" setting, i'e. I can't hold the shutter open for a long time exposure, I have to rely on the automatic shutter. On reflection though, even if they had such a setting, it would be very difficult to use without a cable release.
Another problem is the lack of a filter thread on the lens. It is possible to buy an attachment to fit on the front of the lens (for about £20) but not from Canon. The camera comes equipped with a rather flimsy lens hood, this fits in the same place as the filter adaptor so you can't use a filter and the lens hood. One problem I've found with the lens hood is the fact that when it's being used it's very easy to twist and it's not always easy to soo the focussing screen well enough to pick this up. The result, if you're not very careful, is the corners chopped off your photos when using wide angle. Incidentally, I ordered a filter holder from a company calle digitalmediastore ages ago and I'm still waiting. I got one fron an Ebay seller in a couple of days.
All in all, this camera is very expensive for what you get from it. It's rather complicated and has a lot of different knobs and dials but the handbook is on a CD, meaning that you either have to take a lap-top everywhere with you ar print it out as I did. As I said above, the resulting booklet runs to 304 pages and even printing on both sides of the paper it's about an inch thick and used the best part of a cartridge of ink. I have been taking photographs now for something like 55 years, and Canon have always been up there amongst the best camera makers. If this camera is anything to go by, they seem to have been taken over by the cost cutting brigade who tend to see customers as little more than money making machines.



















