Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

10038 отзывов пользователей o Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

Пользовались Canon PowerShot SX160 IS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор

Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

03.03.2015

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Many of these adapters are having a hard time fitting properly on the a7ii and a7s because these newer models have new metal mounts instead of the old plastic ones on the a7 and a7r. I originally purchased a Fotasy adapter, and you could not turn it to lock. I even tried filing that adapter in various ways.

This Neewer (branded FOTGA) adapter that I received locked on smoothly, and it was cheaper. I've read that others have had trouble with this adapter on the a7s, so maybe every brand just has a few bad eggs..?
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

24.06.2015

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

the cap coming with the kit does not fit at all. when mounting to my Sony A6000 with 16-50mm lens, there is a shadow at comer of the view.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

22.04.2015

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

Ordered expedited shipping because I needed new memory cards ASAP for my old camera because I was going on vacation. The cards which arrived were a different brand than listed (not "Transcend") and would not work in my Canon Powershot A530 camera. I have never otherwise had a problem so long as the cards were SD 2 GB. Extremely disappointing.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

09.06.2015

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

This adapter is amazing. It works exactly as described, and paired with a Minolta ROKKOR-X 45mm ($13 on eBay), you can get fantastic images (I shoot with an a6000).
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

04.08.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I have owned this camera for over 7 years now and it has never let me down. Back in 2007, you didn't have a lot of options for hybrid camera/video recorder. There were a couple, but the megapixels were low or it had slow shutter speed. I was very lucky though, at CES in 2006 Canon came out with the TX1.

Here is the killer features folks, Optical Zoom and 720P. This baby has 10x Optical Zoom. Which was huge back then for a hybrid. In addition it has 7.1MP and records in 720P. The lens tucks itself back in and has a little shutter and its all automatic. Even has a standby power program in case you left it running. Software wise it works very well, easy to navigate the LCD. Finally, when your all done it can fit in your pocket. The camera is a little larger than a pack of cigarettes or playing cards, whichever you prefer.

The only drawback to all that glory is storage. At the time I had to keep a laptop nearby to offload video and pictures each day. Even though I was using two 8GB SDHC cards. When recording video, it literally ate through 1GB or so every 15 min.

Flash forward to 2014 and my TX1 has gone to many places. Multiple States, Australia, and recently South Africa on Safari.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

10.05.2015

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Works great on my Nex 6.
Mounted Minolta Roxxer 50mm f1.4.
Takes great picture.
Its made of metal and not cheap weak plastic like others.

Make sure to turn on 'take picture with out lense' on Nex6 to use manual lense.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

22.01.2015

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

My first one was stolen in 2010, and I was shocked to find out how much it would cost me at the time to replace it. About three times as much as I had paid for it. I loved the camera and was devastated to loose it. After trying several different brands/models over the next 4 years, only to find none of them matched the quality of this camera, I finally looked for this one again on Amazon and got it (used, in "like new" condition). Haven't had much opportunity to really test this one out yet, but it is definitely like new, and exactly the model I had before, so I expect to be just as happy with it.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

04.06.2015

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

Express delivery, however the item stop working wishing 24 hours & I need it for my holiday. I'm flying tomorrow. What a joke. Not good at all
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

03.05.2015

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

A brilliant camera for the price - delivered quickly and packaged well. This was second-hand but really, you wouldn't know. Not the most amazingly, clear pictures but that's the extra you would otherwise pay. Overall, simple to use and great value.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

07.05.2015

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

We bought a used Canon Powershot A620 and need a memory card to make it work. We bought these memory cards, hoping that that it would do the trick. IT DID! Thank you! The cards arrived very quick and as advertised.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

27.05.2015

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Now able to use my old 35 mm lenses on digital format. Some lenses are a bit wobbly, but I think it's due to lens wear rather than this adapter.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

21.04.2015

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I'vd had my Cannon PowerShot SD1000 digital ELPH for years. I finally needed a replacement battery and this one fit the bill. I has been working just fine. As a real estate appraiser who needs his camera to keep taking pictures, this battery has served me well.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

18.05.2015

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

This is not designed to accept the lens cap that came with it. There is no way to keep this and the lens cap on together. Lens cap only works without the hood.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

11.03.2014

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Canon SX160 is a fun camera. It does what is claimed. Let me use my usual disclaimer, in the interest of fairness, and admit that many cameras by reputable makers (and there are many) deliver what they promise. It is more about what camera traits you are looking for. So, I would suggest to anyone looking to buy one to google 'camera trait search' and get the whole picture.The SX160 is a fixed lens camera (point and shoot, some would say), with 16 resolution (megapixels), and a big x16 zoom. The sensor size is 1/2.3 inch CCD-type, which is standard for cameras of its class.If you were to, say, take pictures of friends and family at an outdoor gathering, this camera is what you need. If you get ambitious, there will be stumbling blocks. Here is the camera's trait mix: It does not have a viewfinder, which, again, many in its class don't. The ISO rating, which is the gauge for how well it does in low light, is 1600. That rating is lower than many others, but it is sufficient for most purposes. The video is a Full HD- that is 1980x1080 resolution. The camera gives you the option to control manually both the exposure and the focus. It does not have a hot shoe for an external flash option. That is not unexpected for its size and category. The LCD screen is a 230,000 resolution. The camera does not do RAW processing but you would need only if you did not want to be limited by JPEG type storage. The weight of the camera is 291 grams, which is light for its zoom.Overall, nice camera. Having been into photography for a while, I do stress though that you do a camera trait search. That will also tell you more about what you want.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

08.12.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

My aunt brought this camera for my father 6 years ago, and this was the first digital camera we used. After my father i used it for 4 years. Now I use a DSLR camera from canon.
This small piece of hardware is one of the best things I ever owned! Almost everything I know about taking photographs, I learnt from this camera. Canon allows users to take maximum manual control from the very basic cameras they make. And the colours are splendid!
Even today this camera works perfectly. The only reason I can't use it anymore is because it drains its batteries extremely fast. If anyone is interested in buying this camera, I would say go for it, don't look further, this is THE entry level camera.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

11.03.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Canon S120 is a feature-rich camera. It does what it promises, and does it well. I have to admit, though, that many cameras by reputable makers (and there are many) deliver what they promise. It is more about what camera traits you are looking for. So, I would suggest to anyone looking to buy one to google 'camera trait search' and get the lay of the land.The S120 is a fixed lens camera (point and shoot, some would say), with 12.1 resolution (megapixels), and x5 zoom. Probably the most important point for this class of cameras is the sensor size, which is 1/1.7 inch CMOS-type. That is just a number, but one that matters. Most point and shoots have a 1/2.3 inch sensor, which is a couple of steps worse than the S120.It does not have a viewfinder, which many in its class don't. The ISO rating is 12,800 which makes it work better in low light. The video is a Full HD- that is 1980x1080 resolution. The camera gives you the option to control manually both the exposure and the focus. It does not have a hot shoe for an external flash option. That is not unexpected for its size and category. The LCD screen has a 922,000 resolution touchscreen, and the burst rate- for fast action- of 9.4 is a great feature. Few cameras in its class have a burst capability that delivers like this one. The camera also does RAW processing which would matter if you did not want to be limited by JPEG storage only. And all this with a light camera weighing only 217 grams.Overall, great camera. Having been into photography for a while, I do stress though that you do a camera trait search. That will also tell you more about what you want.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

16.12.2013

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

The SX100 series of Canon cameras is for the hobbyist photographer (not the professional) who does not require one of Canon's subcompact, capable and cute but tiny Elphs (the SD series) or the upscale S100 series or the superior, faster version of this one--the SX200 seriesThe SX160 and 170 are not bad or mediocre cameras. Canon doesn't make any cameras that give you poorly defined or uncolorful images. The quality is better than what you can get from a smartphone camera, and the camera provides more flexibility because of the long telephoto lens (from 16X to 20X power). It's also a good movie camera (be sure to get a spacious SD card); also, hold the camera still and avoid those irritating short sequences of just several seconds.The SX100 series represents a compromise in size and weight between a Canon Elph (I own the extremely tiny SD780 with viewfinder and the Elph 300) and a full-size camera like a Canon EOS or Rebel. In fact, the SX100 series is "compact" in size, fitting into larger pockets with little problem yet harder to lose than the "subcompactd" Canon Elph.The Canon SX160 was rated slightly higher than this year's SX170 by Consumer Reports, perhaps because of slightly better stabiilizing for movies. But from the consumer's perspective, the main reason to select the SX160 is that it takes standard AA alkaline batteries rather than Canon's proprietary batteries, as does the SX170, which undeniably offers a slightly more powerful telephoto lens.I'll admit that keeping Canon chargers and batteries always ready can occasionally be a problem (moreover, my wife's camera takes different Canon batteries from mine). Moreover, carrying AA batteries in a camera bag while traveling overseas is one effective way to avoid the problem of different voltages for charging. Hence, the SX160 is the camera I'm gifting to a family member who lost the more expensive camera I gave him last year.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

21.04.2015

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Excellent camera on daylight environments and great picture quality.

Pros:
Good video recording (is not HD video but is good)

Con:
Too much noise on daylight pictures if not taken with flash.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

07.06.2013

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

*Update 10/7/13*Still in photographic love with the g15. I've started taking pictures in RAW format and have actually noticed a significant difference between JPEG and RAW. The colors are better, shadows are more defined, and while I haven't tried this myself, those in the know say RAW format is much easier to edit in post production. Here's the thing - compared to JPEG, RAW format files are H-U-G-E (in some cases, almost EIGHT times as large!) No wonder the RAW images are prettier. The JPEG files average out at about 3.5 - 4 Megs per photo, while the raw files are upwards of 27 megs . . .! I guess I'd better invest in some extra storage space!I have been a fan of the Powershot G series since the G1. I have owned the G1, G5, G9, as well as SX200IS and SX40. I was lured away from the "traditional" G series by the prospect of a greater optical zoom (SX200is) and ultimately the "superzoom" (SX40). Now I have returned to the G15 and I am overwhelmed with joy. While the zoom and superzoom cameras take decent shots and have nice close-up capabilities, the overall quality of the photos (color balance, sharpness, depth of field) was lacking. The superzoom had issues with vignetting and distortion of the image at the outer edges. One of the things that the early G series (as well as most early model digital cameras) had problems with was low light shots. The sensors couldn't handle low light situations without graininess.Enter the G15. It is a solidly constructed body, has plenty of functionality for the budding photographer and the serious amateur, takes GREAT low light shots, and just takes beautifully crisp, balanced pictures. I am very pleased with my purchase.Pros:*Much improved low light shooting*TONS of features (facial recognition, self portrait with a wink, "fisheye," posterizing, slo-mo video, HD video, etc, etc, etc, etc!*Dials and buttons are placed within easy reach (new exposure setting dial is very nice)*LCD is big and beautiful (doesn't flip out, but I always figured that was one more thing to break)*AUTO shots are crisp, balanced, deeply colored and gorgeous*Plenty of options to allow you to play with exposure time, aperture, timer, white balance, color swap, monochrome and much much more.*Multiple accessories allow for adapting filters and lenses, external flash, macro ring lights, remotes, slaves, and on and on.Cons:*unless you are interested in delving into tweaking your photos, all of these features might be a bit overwhelming.*body might be a little heavy for some .This is a brilliant camera. I'm glad I came back.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

26.12.2012

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

I was in the market for a pocket sized camera for traveling (I own a Canon 60D, but at times it is just too bulky for what I need.) The G15 sounded like just what I needed - viewfinder, RAW, compact, external hot shoe, high ISO, many features similar to my 60D.I've used this camera all of 5 times, and I will be returning it. The battery won't hold a charge for more than 20-ish photos, the camera actually *heats up* under the grip where the battery is housed, the camera will regularly turn itsself off with the lens extended, and yes, the viewfinder is kind of useless (yes, yes, paralax -- I was spoiled with the 60D.) Minor gripe for not including a paper manual (lame.)I am gong to return this - it may be some sort of fluke, crappy battery, etc. I WANT to like this camera a LOT. But right now I can't trust it to last half an hour, much less a trip. :(I will update my review after camera #2. But I will also admit I am buying a different camera on Amazon on the day-after-Christmas sales to hedge my bets, just in case.C'mon, Canon, don't let me down....Update:So, I turned the previous camera back in and got a new one of the same model. So far, zero issues of the first camera, which leads me to believe it was just unlucky chance. Very pleased with new/same camera so far. I haven't played around with all the features as I still have to print out the manual (still lame). I really like the heft of this camera, and it fits nicely into my sweatshirt pocket, so I take photos all the time. I do get a little nervous just throwing the camera into my pocket with the delicate lens cover, but so far so good. The viewfinder is no good unless you have time to set up a shot and correct for the errors not being lined up with the lens. Otherwise its screen all the way.Update 2 (Aug '13):Less impressed with this camera over time. The replacement camera is still operating normally, so its not that. Just got back from vacation and am feeling less than pleased.- I *really* dislike the lag after pressing the shutter button. Just a split second, but enough that I missed shot after shot.- This one is personal opinion: I do not like having to use the screen to compose shots. I much much prefer the viewfinder/eyepiece, but the offset from the lens is so bad its not really an option.- That delicate lens cover? Yeah, my lens got scratched. And yes I do own a case for it. Obviously it happened some other time, something brushed against it enough to move the cover and put a nice mark on my glass.- The auto/P/Tv/Av etc dial on top turns *too* easily. I'd be snapping away happily, walk away looking at my pictures and realize the dial had slipped to SET yet again. Arg!- The auto focus often seemed to have a mind of its own. We regularly disagreed about what it was supposed to be focusing on.- I did enjoy playing with some of the creative effects.I'll look into having the glass fixed, but I'm concerned it'll be too cost prohibitive. I'd love for this to be my grab and go camera, but I really can't recommend it as such. I'm not sure what I would recommend it for, except perhaps its size? Your mileage may vary. (shrug)
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

23.04.2015

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

This was surprisingly well built, mates to my MD lenses tightly and perfectly and has worked very well so far. I love this, and for the price, it's unbeatable and gives life to my old glass!
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

14.09.2013

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I would have preferred to stay in 12 mp , as the 16 mp sensor produces more noise. For the price, is the best compact camera with manual controls and batteries aa, already say that swallows alkaline batteries , but with a smart charger with refresh cycle ( I bought one for less than 30 dollars ) and battery hybrid as the sanyo eneloop , maha imedion 2400, Ansmann max -e 2500, is another story, perhaps better than many compact lithium batteries , if already ... many will say they are costs attachments are to the camera, but I guarantee which is much cheaper than buying a charger and extra battery for a camera that uses lithium battery proprietary type (which can cost up to 80 dollars or more if you buy the original brand , because the imitations are good for nothing ) , for example, I purchase 4 of 4 batteries aa combos imedion 2400 (total 16 ) for 44 bucks and sony charger with refresh cycle for 28 dollars , meaning I have the equivalent of 8 changes battery and charger for only 72 dollars (I forget to change batteries for all my vacation, since these batteries only lose 25 % of their power after a year , for those who want to save, every 4 batteries are sold for 12 dollars , okay buy only 8 batteries ) . Also these batteries are more consistent with the use of flash .If we add the ability of many manual settings, zoom good enough to be compact and price, and some reduction in size compared to its predecessors , we have a winner of 4 stars , the only reason I did not give 5 stars is because . canon was tempted to increase the megapixels to 16, for marketing purposes , and this produced that its picture quality is fine for the price but now the images have more noise. (which is acceptable for this price but a deterioration with respect to the sensors 12 and 14 Mp) . For less than 145 dollars is very good camera for those who like manual controls and AA batteries .Now that canon, decided to change the sx series , with the new model sx 170 lithium batteries , the canon sx 160 becomes an added value, because for 200 dollars or more , one would recommend the canon sx 260 or higher models. For its low price and aa batteries , now more than ever the sx160 is a good option .
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

17.02.2015

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I've had this camera before and loved it then too. My last one was carried in my backpack with me for a few years and one day the lens just wouldn't open anymore. Though it doesn't have a shit-ton of mega pixels - it takes a nice and every clean picture. It also does good with video recording, has great sound quality, you can zoom in/out while recording and the recording is also very clean too.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

08.05.2015

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

Did the trick although the last one i had lasted less thatn a year. For the price i just bought another
Отзыв предоставлен
Показаны отзывы 2425-2448 из 10038.

Похожие товары с лучшей оценкой

9.9/10 баллов

Nikon D810

198 отзывов

от 143513.00 руб.

9.8/10 баллов

Nikon Z6 Kit

115 отзывов

от 276890.00 руб.

9.8/10 баллов

Sony Alpha ILCE-7M3 Kit

189 отзывов

от 185000.00 руб.

9.8/10 баллов

Nikon D750 Body

592 отзывов

от 128874.00 руб.

9.8/10 баллов

Canon EOS 5D Body

645 отзывов

от 114051.00 руб.

9.8/10 баллов

Nikon D7500 Body

77 отзывов

от 91074.00 руб.

9.7/10 баллов

Nikon D6

107 отзывов

от 1369231.00 руб.

9.7/10 баллов

Canon EOS 50D Kit

170 отзывов

от 1075533.00 руб.

9.7/10 баллов

Nikon D750 Kit

234 отзывов

от 164499.00 руб.

9.7/10 баллов

Canon EOS 600D

593 отзывов

от 53374.00 руб.

9.6/10 баллов

Nikon D850

108 отзывов

от 238990.00 руб.

9.6/10 баллов

Sony Alpha ILCE-6400

184 отзывов

от 99990.00 руб.

9.6/10 баллов

Canon EOS 1100D

472 отзывов

от 27000.00 руб.

9.6/10 баллов

Nikon D3100

1621 отзывов

от 23805.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Pentax K-1 Mark II Kit

724 отзывов

от 448990.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Panasonic Lumix DC-S1H

89 отзывов

от 229990.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Sony Alpha ILCE-7M4

77 отзывов

от 201999.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Fujifilm X-T30 II Kit XC15-45mm, серебр

77 отзывов

от 142690.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Canon EOS 77D Kit

280 отзывов

от 94980.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Canon EOS 7D Mark II Body

205 отзывов

от 93000.00 руб.