Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
10038 отзывов пользователей o Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
Пользовались
Canon PowerShot SX160 IS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор



I mostly photograph with film. When I decided to get a digital camera, I had a lot of very specific criteria I was looking for, and I did a lot of research. Indeed, not finding any camera that met these criteria kept me from "going digital" for several years.
In the SX110IS, it seemed I had finally found what I was looking for -- a compact digital camera with a built-in flash, that I could use to take multiple trial shots of displays before committing them to actual film. I wanted something light and portable. I wanted the option to auto-focus or manual focus; this camera offers both. I wanted the choice of a full-manual mode; this camera has it. I wanted a significant amount of /optical/ zoom; the SX110 IS comes through again.
Especially important to me was the battery situation. I own a Sony digital camera in which a replacement battery-pack costs more than the camera is currently worth; I didn't want to get into that situation again. That the SX110 IS runs on common AA batteries was a huge plus for me. However, this boon is offset by the short life of batteries in this camera -- this thing eats batteries. I got so that I wouldn't go to even an afternoon holiday get-together without bringing at least two sets of spare batteries, and I'd use them both. If I used the flash a lot, I'd go through three sets of batteries in 2 hours.
For a while I tried rechargeble batteries, which at least meant I didn't have to buy them in packs of 20, but they have an even shorter lifespan in the camera, going dead about 20% sooner than non-rechargables.
Well, the battery situation was annoying, but not unmanagable. The real problem, the one that made me rate the camera three-stars, rather than four or five, came later on. I don't take a great number of flash pictures, and I usually keep the flash set on "medium", so I don't think I was taxing the unit beyond reasonable expectations. Yet after less than a year, the flash quit working, suddenly, and completely. I took the camera into a camera shop, and the repairman got it working again by "cleaning" something in the camera.
Just about a year later, the flash quit working again. This time, the local repair shop said they couldn't fix it, so I sent it in to Canon, with the $111 fee they estimated it would cost to repair it. After about a month, not having heard back from them, I e-mailed the company, and was told that "parts were no longer available" for this camera, and they suggested I "upgrade" -- at a certain cost, of course.
Well, none of their suggested "upgrades" (all of which are refrubished, used cameras) have the selection of features for which I purchased the SX110 IS. They're either bigger, heavier, don't have the same selection of shooting modes, or use expensive, proprietary battery packs instead of commonly available batteries.
More to the point, I am astonished that a camera, purchased new from the company, and barely 2-years old can't be repaired because /parts are no longer available/. How can that be?
I can buy parts for a 22 year old car in any auto parts store. I just repaired a 15-year old refrigerator, with no trouble. I have a 75-year old DLR camera that the local shop can still maintain. But the /manufacturer/ can't get parts for one of their own products, less than 3-years old?
That kind of thing is a deal-breaker for me. When I shop for my next digital camera, I'll be looking at vendors other than Canon.















This camera has many manual settings, it lets you select everything from ISO speed to the white balance in the picture. You can take multiple consecutive shots, stitch photos together and it even has a setting for "micro" photos such as close ups of plants or bugs. Like other reviewers have stated, it does take a long time to load after using flash and it doesn't do well when there's not a lot of light. To take a picture without a lot of light you really need to use some type of tripod or improvise and set it on top of something so that you can adjust the ISO speed and the picture doesn't come out fuzzy. I played around with it a lot and I've found a balance. I can take pictures without a lot of light without much of a problem, but if you're new to photography, then it may take you some time.
This camera also goes through batteries very quickly! You really need to have an extra pair with you at all times. I use Duracel rechargeable batteries, and it isn't too much of an inconvenience. I just charge all 4 batteries before I go hiking, and that's normally enough to last the camera the whole trip.


I have owned three Canon Powershot cameras. Two of these lasted for the warranty period, and then returned lens errors. The third was not used much because of the tilted and inferior images.
Canon refuses to acknowledge the lens error problem (check the forums) and will charge over $150 to repair. They always claim that the problem is abuse by the owner. A camera repairman told me the problem is almost always a faulty sensor. Worse, I recommended the camera to friend - who now has the same issue: Lens Error, which make the camera unusable. I believe the upper-end SLR cameras are still good, but the Powershot series has had a problem.
I love the camera menu and layout better than Nikon. However, Nikon has remained dependable for me. After multiple Powershot lens errors without support from Canon, I don't dare buy another. My first Powershot took super-great pictures, my second took very poor pictures, and this camera took good pictures (not super, but good). I always use the more expensive professional-type SD cards. To follow Canon's response, this camera is not capable of regular use (fragile). I would like to know if anyone has had a similar problem with the latest Powershot product... I really like the look & feel, but I need something dependable.


The pinch lens cap I received didn't fit anything--not the 16-60 lens, or the outer rim of the lens hood.

