Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

10038 отзывов пользователей o Canon PowerShot SX160 IS

Пользовались Canon PowerShot SX160 IS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор

Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

09.05.2012

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I preordered this camera when it was first announced. I was a little disappointed when Amazon dropped the price before it even reached my house. I anticipated this camera not only for the waterproof capabilities, but also because it is shock proof...and probably because it was a Canon. I live in Hawaii and intend to take this to the beach to take photos and videos in and out of the water. I'm a special education teacher and wanted to have my students to create their own learning stories with photos that they took themselves. I am very reluctant to have them use a DSLR or even a regular point & shoot camera with the fear of them dropping $1000+ worth of equipment.When I got the camera, I quickly looked over the manual for any waterproof information that I might need to know. Everything was straight-forward with no hard-to-find switches to lock any waterproof seals. In other words, feel free to take this out of the box, put in the card and battery, and take underwater photos. I didn't even charge the battery and was able to take about 100 photos and 15 minutes of video right out of the box. I used this opportunity and the next 2 days to extensively test my camera in order to create this review.DESIGN: 6/10It's feels very sturdy like it should. The blue metal panel on the front is very nice to look at. Unfortunately, I think the shape is a little too "showy". If you want to show off the fact that you have a waterproof camera then this is the one for you. (I sort of liken it to a Prius, which everyone knows is a hybrid. At first glance, many people will know there is something special about this camera.) I'm a little confused about the left-hand side of the camera which is a little curved. You can put a strap there, but I don't really see the functionality of it being that shape.My biggest gripe is that the included handstrap can be "twisted" on and clicks into a metal plug. It can be EASILY removed with a very light press on the button and twisting it off. It gives me the fear that it could be accidentally bumped and twisted and the camera will detach from your wrist (though you'd probably have to be mighty clumsy to do so). I would have wished that the strap attached directly to the camera instead of this metal knob. The strap clip also protrudes diagonally out of the bottom corner and you need to remove this if you want to lay in on a flat surface to take photos or video.IMAGE QUALITY: 9/10I am a camera enthusiast and mainly use Canon DSLRs (5D, 7D, 1D series, etc...) with L lenses. I also have an Olympus micro 4/3s camera and even have a Nikon D2x, so I'd like to think I know my stuff. Prior to this point & shoot, I used a Canon SD1100 before it got stolen. With this SD1100, I took over 10,000 photos and took hundreds of hours of video (which I made into DVDs to view on TV, or straight from iTunes to a TV...it's only 480p) edited with iMovie. I've always gotten compliments on the video quality of this older model P&S, and was quite impressed with it myself.As far as photo quality of this camera, I've got to say that it's good, but nothing more than what you'd expect from a P&S camera from 2012. Color is nice and even zoomed in at 100%, the image quality is as great as one might expect. As with any camera, keeping the ISO as low as possible will keep any noise or grain to a minimum. Remember, you're paying a premium because this camera can go underwater or in the snow. It would be unfair to expect DSLR quality from this camera because that's not what it's meant for.The same goes for video quality: the reason you bought this camera and paid more for it than another P&S is because it is waterproof. If you want that IMAX look, you've got to spend thousands of dollars. If you can't afford that, this is the next best thing. The quality of the out-of-water and underwater videos was superb. I took it to our pool and took videos of various colorful toys underwater. It was a sunny day and the quality was great, vibrant, and clear. I wasn't able to test it in low light situations. I also have a Panasonic TS-10 (underwater camera from 2010) and the Canon D20's video and image quality is surprisingly better.For on-land videos, the microphone is not as good as normal P&Ss. I'm assuming that it has another waterproof protective layer over it. I don't think this should be surprising to anyone.One last note on video. This camera has a 5x zoom. When shooting video, it can optically zoom in and out. It will also focus all the way from macro to infinity while still recording, which is different from other cameras that I used in the past, where if you started your video, it couldn't refocus or optically zoom. It even adjusts exposure, meaning that if you're recording in a bright area and come into a dim area, it will adjust automatically while still recording video. Thank you Canon!ERGONOMICS: 8/10Buttons are nicely spaced. There is a large thumb rest button that I just can't figure out why it's there except for cosmetic purpos
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

09.05.2012

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I preordered this camera when it was first announced. I was a little disappointed when Amazon dropped the price before it even reached my house. I anticipated this camera not only for the waterproof capabilities, but also because it is shock proof...and probably because it was a Canon. I live in Hawaii and intend to take this to the beach to take photos and videos in and out of the water. I'm a special education teacher and wanted to have my students to create their own learning stories with photos that they took themselves. I am very reluctant to have them use a DSLR or even a regular point & shoot camera with the fear of them dropping $1000+ worth of equipment.When I got the camera, I quickly looked over the manual for any waterproof information that I might need to know. Everything was straight-forward with no hard-to-find switches to lock any waterproof seals. In other words, feel free to take this out of the box, put in the card and battery, and take underwater photos. I didn't even charge the battery and was able to take about 100 photos and 15 minutes of video right out of the box. I used this opportunity and the next 2 days to extensively test my camera in order to create this review.DESIGN: 6/10It's feels very sturdy like it should. The blue metal panel on the front is very nice to look at. Unfortunately, I think the shape is a little too "showy". If you want to show off the fact that you have a waterproof camera then this is the one for you. (I sort of liken it to a Prius, which everyone knows is a hybrid. At first glance, many people will know there is something special about this camera.) I'm a little confused about the left-hand side of the camera which is a little curved. You can put a strap there, but I don't really see the functionality of it being that shape.My biggest gripe is that the included handstrap can be "twisted" on and clicks into a metal plug. It can be EASILY removed with a very light press on the button and twisting it off. It gives me the fear that it could be accidentally bumped and twisted and the camera will detach from your wrist (though you'd probably have to be mighty clumsy to do so). I would have wished that the strap attached directly to the camera instead of this metal knob. The strap clip also protrudes diagonally out of the bottom corner and you need to remove this if you want to lay in on a flat surface to take photos or video.IMAGE QUALITY: 9/10I am a camera enthusiast and mainly use Canon DSLRs (5D, 7D, 1D series, etc...) with L lenses. I also have an Olympus micro 4/3s camera and even have a Nikon D2x, so I'd like to think I know my stuff. Prior to this point & shoot, I used a Canon SD1100 before it got stolen. With this SD1100, I took over 10,000 photos and took hundreds of hours of video (which I made into DVDs to view on TV, or straight from iTunes to a TV...it's only 480p) edited with iMovie. I've always gotten compliments on the video quality of this older model P&S, and was quite impressed with it myself.As far as photo quality of this camera, I've got to say that it's good, but nothing more than what you'd expect from a P&S camera from 2012. Color is nice and even zoomed in at 100%, the image quality is as great as one might expect. As with any camera, keeping the ISO as low as possible will keep any noise or grain to a minimum. Remember, you're paying a premium because this camera can go underwater or in the snow. It would be unfair to expect DSLR quality from this camera because that's not what it's meant for.The same goes for video quality: the reason you bought this camera and paid more for it than another P&S is because it is waterproof. If you want that IMAX look, you've got to spend thousands of dollars. If you can't afford that, this is the next best thing. The quality of the out-of-water and underwater videos was superb. I took it to our pool and took videos of various colorful toys underwater. It was a sunny day and the quality was great, vibrant, and clear. I wasn't able to test it in low light situations. I also have a Panasonic TS-10 (underwater camera from 2010) and the Canon D20's video and image quality is surprisingly better.For on-land videos, the microphone is not as good as normal P&Ss. I'm assuming that it has another waterproof protective layer over it. I don't think this should be surprising to anyone.One last note on video. This camera has a 5x zoom. When shooting video, it can optically zoom in and out. It will also focus all the way from macro to infinity while still recording, which is different from other cameras that I used in the past, where if you started your video, it couldn't refocus or optically zoom. It even adjusts exposure, meaning that if you're recording in a bright area and come into a dim area, it will adjust automatically while still recording video. Thank you Canon!ERGONOMICS: 8/10Buttons are nicely spaced. There is a large thumb rest button that I just can't figure out why it's there except for cosmetic purpos
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

10.11.2015

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

This was a disappointing buy. An over sized recess for the battery means even the lightest of touches ,movements, vibrations can disconnect the battery from the chargers location pins. Although this is a cheap item the frustration caused by inefficient and sometimes incomplete charging is not worth even a cheap price in my opinion. Finally there is no light indicator ;green when the battery is fully charged. The red light goes out but you are not sure this means a full charge and certainly on occasions it was not charged fully. In my view the risks out weigh the price,
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

09.05.2013

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

This is a tough call for me, as I 've used Cannon products for years, and own two of their film SLR cameras that I've had little trouble with in 15 years.

I mostly photograph with film. When I decided to get a digital camera, I had a lot of very specific criteria I was looking for, and I did a lot of research. Indeed, not finding any camera that met these criteria kept me from "going digital" for several years.

In the SX110IS, it seemed I had finally found what I was looking for -- a compact digital camera with a built-in flash, that I could use to take multiple trial shots of displays before committing them to actual film. I wanted something light and portable. I wanted the option to auto-focus or manual focus; this camera offers both. I wanted the choice of a full-manual mode; this camera has it. I wanted a significant amount of /optical/ zoom; the SX110 IS comes through again.

Especially important to me was the battery situation. I own a Sony digital camera in which a replacement battery-pack costs more than the camera is currently worth; I didn't want to get into that situation again. That the SX110 IS runs on common AA batteries was a huge plus for me. However, this boon is offset by the short life of batteries in this camera -- this thing eats batteries. I got so that I wouldn't go to even an afternoon holiday get-together without bringing at least two sets of spare batteries, and I'd use them both. If I used the flash a lot, I'd go through three sets of batteries in 2 hours.

For a while I tried rechargeble batteries, which at least meant I didn't have to buy them in packs of 20, but they have an even shorter lifespan in the camera, going dead about 20% sooner than non-rechargables.

Well, the battery situation was annoying, but not unmanagable. The real problem, the one that made me rate the camera three-stars, rather than four or five, came later on. I don't take a great number of flash pictures, and I usually keep the flash set on "medium", so I don't think I was taxing the unit beyond reasonable expectations. Yet after less than a year, the flash quit working, suddenly, and completely. I took the camera into a camera shop, and the repairman got it working again by "cleaning" something in the camera.

Just about a year later, the flash quit working again. This time, the local repair shop said they couldn't fix it, so I sent it in to Canon, with the $111 fee they estimated it would cost to repair it. After about a month, not having heard back from them, I e-mailed the company, and was told that "parts were no longer available" for this camera, and they suggested I "upgrade" -- at a certain cost, of course.

Well, none of their suggested "upgrades" (all of which are refrubished, used cameras) have the selection of features for which I purchased the SX110 IS. They're either bigger, heavier, don't have the same selection of shooting modes, or use expensive, proprietary battery packs instead of commonly available batteries.

More to the point, I am astonished that a camera, purchased new from the company, and barely 2-years old can't be repaired because /parts are no longer available/. How can that be?

I can buy parts for a 22 year old car in any auto parts store. I just repaired a 15-year old refrigerator, with no trouble. I have a 75-year old DLR camera that the local shop can still maintain. But the /manufacturer/ can't get parts for one of their own products, less than 3-years old?

That kind of thing is a deal-breaker for me. When I shop for my next digital camera, I'll be looking at vendors other than Canon.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

22.11.2012

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

The G15 is summed up by dpreview, in the conclusion to their multipage review, as follows: " The Canon Powershot G15 is a well-refined product and a joy to use. It is very quick and responsive in operation, built like a tank and offers the most external controls in its class. In combination with the fast 28-140mm F1.8-2.8 lens that makes it a very versatile and pocketable photographic tool that offers almost the same degree of control as much larger DSLRs "The G15 is highly commended by this reviewer ( I have owned one for a few weeks ) for outdoor work, where a high quality compact camera is required for convenience and portability, and it is useable at higher iso settings than any previous G series Canon. Within the 'G' series, the G10 will produce very slightly higher quality images, but only at its lowest iso setting, above which it gives up ( unless you're prepared to post process raw files). High iso settings are essential for taking photos in low light, or of night scenes like floodlit cityscapes without a tripod, and only recently in the history of digital camera development has it been possible to achieve good high iso results with compact cameras. The G15 is as good as it gets in this regard, at time of writing, for a compact camera with a fixed zoom lens. It is wonderfully fast to focus, as well.The G15 must be used with care for good results with flash. By default an evening scene will be transformed into bright daylight with all the atmosphere of the evening or nighttime lost. Best portraits indoors or in low light are usually taken with fill in flash and Canon is notoriously worse than Nikon or Fuji at getting this right in auto mode. To compare: If I set my Fujifilm X100 to auto, I get a perfect shot every time, retaining shadow detail and lowlight atmosphere with the flash set to 'on'. The G15 needs more work, but that's not to say it cannot be done. This is how, for an indoor portrait where you are within 12 feet of your subject:TIP: Set the mode dial to 'P'. Click the flash up, and set it to 'ON'. Set the iso to 200 iso. Set white balance to 'auto'. As a starting point I would suggest exposing at an exposure compensation of -2, and setting the flash compensation dial to -2 as well. Too dark? Of course it is, but now you know how to find the two settings you need to adjust! Raise one or other slowly, a little at a time, and only one at a time between each trial shot. This is trial and error, to get the result you want, but with no variables because you are only adjusting one setting at a time. When you have reached the level of brightness that you like, remember your settings, write them down, and use them for indoor portraits. Finally adjust your white balance away from 'auto' if you wish to remove a colour tint ( for example if your lighting is correct but your result looks too yellow, or blue, or orange...)TIP2:Another method: Don't use flash at all. Set the camera to auto iso. Make sure your subject is lit more brightly ( you can still be subtle about it ) than their surroundings so that they do not disappear into the shadows. Shoot. Adjust white balance as necessary. Shoot again.Combine both of the above. or even try using an external flash, which can 'bounce' or ' diffuse' the light it produces. Photography is, after all, best described as " Painting With Light ".The G15 is a fabulous compact camera, the best 'G' series ever, and I know of several photographers who would unhesitatingly use one to take exhibition quality landscape shots to print at sizes up to A3+. At a level of expertise where the results might be mounted and sold, most semi-pro photographers would then post process, but it is not necessary to do that to create very fine photos indeed, even in auto mode if you are a beginner.I chose the G15 over all other compact cameras because it takes fabulous pictures and because of the size and shape of it, which better than all of the others, for me, allows me to hold it steady for best results, even on top of a dartmoor tor in a howling gale. And because of how fast it can focus, even in low light. And I still love my G10 ( see my review of that also if you're interested ), just as my wife continues to enjoy her G12.Thank you for reading, and I hope you enjoy your photography!
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

02.01.2014

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I don't own the new model but I know that all of the specs of the old model and the new model are the same except one important aspect that was important to me. This model uses AA batteries. The newer model (the SX 170) uses a proprietary rechargeable lithium battery that costs $46. While shopping for a small point-and-shoot camera with a nice long zoom range, I spent days comparing prices, mega pixels, zoom lenses, and the cost for needed accessories. I like the Powershot SX in this group because even though it is small and light weight, it still has a "handle" making it easier to hold on to.In my shopping though, I was dismayed to realize that even the least expensive cameras in the range I was considering all but one used proprietary batteries. This particular model (the SX 160) was not actually being listed by some vendors since the newer model was released (the SX 170). I was reading on Amazon, an extensive 3 star review by John Sturgeon of the SX 170 and in it he talks about the battery issue.He pointed out that if you use generic rechargeable batteries ($20) and your camera fails, your warranty is void for using the cheaper generic. I personally would never go out on an excursion on vacation without an extra battery. So you are paying something like $120 for a camera that costs you $46 plus tax and shipping so that you have a backup. This is similar to buying a printer for $200 only to find out later you are going to have to spend $90 to replace the ink cartridges ONE TIME.I had already had the experience of trying to find a camera that would use AA's and only found one which I think had a man zoom to something like the equivalent of 148 MM. After I read that review I started hunting for vendors where I could get the SX 160. I bought one for a friend for Christmas and one for me.This is my backup camera. I don't know if the color clarity meets my expectations yet. It is winter and the colors in the bushes, trees and lawns are pretty blah right now. I have tried to take pics of a Cardinal but I have to do that through a window since he is quite touchy and won't hang around even if I am too visible to him through the glass so that really cuts down on the quality of the photo.I think it is worth it's price because of the battery issue alone! The SX 170 right now is lower than the price I paid for this lower model. I strongly suggest using the Energizer Ultimate Lithium AA batteries. I currently use the non-rechargeable and they cost around $16 for a pkg of 8. For 1/3 the cost of 1 proprietary battery, you can buy 12 pairs of these batteries that Energizer guarantees will not damage your equipment. The rechargeable version of these batteries has recently been introduced but I haven't used them. Personally I would stress out when on vacation having to recharge batteries the end of each day and making sure you carried extra.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

15.11.2015

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

This is still a solid performer after many years of use. Although technology has passed this particular model up, it still would fulfill the needs of most families. The camera is bulky by today's (2015) standards, but I like the way it feels in the hand. This is now a backup camera to a super zoom model, but I occasionally grab it for convenience, or when I need to send it off on a possible "one way mission" with my teen son. If you can find one at a good value this would be a good second camera.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

22.12.2015

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

It doesn't fit well on the Sony A6000. The lens cap is too big for the Sony. The lens hood does not line up well on the Sony A6000 so as to avoid seeing it in the picture. It can never be fully tightened as it will show in the picture itself. It can be good for other cameras but not a good fit for the Sony.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

18.06.2015

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

In my opinion, which was formed from my experience with this Neewer lens hood kit, it is not a beneficial product for use w/ the Sony A6000 standard lens (model SELP1650 - 40.5mm filter thread). The kit provided lens cover is fitted for use with the 40.5 → 52mm kit lens adapter, but it is not fitted for the inside diameter of the lens hood. This defeats the purpose of the hood for those users who wish to leave it in place as a means to protect the lens, as the lack of a lens cap would continue to leave the glass vulnerable to external damage. So, for those users who typically make use of a lens cap to protect their lens, whenever they completed their assignment and went about securing their A6000, it would be necessary to either unscrew and remove the lens hood and attach the kit lens cap to the kit adapter, or unscrew the hood and kit adapter as a single unit and then re-attach the Sony provided lens cover to protect the lens glass.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

26.10.2015

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

Item arrived in a timely manor and meets the product description. On the other hand, the lens hood is of the screw on type, and in this case is a screw on adapt or and a screw on hood. As a result, when assembled tight, the hood , in my example, does not line up on the photographic horizontal. It can be aligned by loosely assembling but the you are faced with a reoccurring alinement problem. All prior hoods I have cede Locke in an indexed position. In short, I will probably never use.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

25.12.2013

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I'm changing my original review because I've gotten to use the camera more.____________________________________If you want a small camera to slip in and out of a purse, this is not for you. The SX 160 is a little bulky (which I don't mind), but that is probably because of the large lens. I'm not kidding, this is twice as thick as my Nikon Coolpix S3000, there is a grip on the side, which is helpful for one handed shots. The camera is a little heavy, but it's not too bad. You can decide which side to put the hand strap on because there are two holes for them.The flash does not pop up automatically. The camera tells you on the screen to pop up the flash. You have to press a little button. Once again, I don't mind.The screen is large and easy to read off of. The buttons are a good size, too. I like the Recording button that instantly starts shooting the video. That's very helpful, because there is a wheel on top that you use to change modes, which takes some time.Now for the image quality:The images are pretty good, even in bad lighting. The scenes are a little hard to find and the shutter speed may be unpredictable. It depends on what mode you are on. I find that the quickest shutter speed is on the low light mode.Like I said, the shutter speed can be random. It changes with every scene option, and you have almost no choice on changing it. There are a few scenes that have a quick speed that are amazing, though. When it is in a fast mode, the picture taken very quickly.The image quality is fantastic, on the camera screen and the computer screen. Most pictures aren't blurry, unless the shutter is really slow. The pictures turn out vivid and sharp.There are SO MANY MODES on this camera, and they're a little hard to find. It's not the most user friendly, but it's not that bad. I'm not an expert photographer or anything and I think I know the camera pretty well.The 16x zoom on this camera is fantastic. The images stay pretty clear as you zoom out more. I could zoom into a person's eye from across the room.I haven't played a lot with the video, but I've tried it out and I can hardly hear it. I think it's just because I have no idea how to turn the volume up.Now, the batteries. I had to.change the batteries twice, I think, the day I got this. I will admit that I was playing around for a while and taking lots of pictures, but still, it was ridiculous. This camera just needs strong batteries.Here's a list of PROS and CONS as a conclusion.PROS:-Great picture quality-Easy to hold-Good in low light-Good shutter speed (on certain modes)-Fantastic zoom-Lots of image options-Flash power can be changedCONS:-A little bulky-Some modes have awful shutter speeds-Needs stronger batteries-Takes some exploring to find featuresOverall a great camera and I would recommend it.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

12.08.2013

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I have been a Pro and Semi-Pro photographer for many years. Partly because of that experience, and partly because of the staggering advances we have seen in digital DSLR cameras, I was feeling that I had fossilized in my picture taking creativity.Although I have repented since, I was an early and loud fulminator against the whole idea of camera phones. I also wrote off Instragram and others like it as abominations.Every day for about the last five years I have carried a pocketable camera of some sort, (mostly the Canon S95/100), when I wasn't carrying my large Nikons. I got good snapshots and sometimes photographic art but little of the excitement I used to feel doing what I can only call "found photography", or spur of the moment and random inspirations.Then I came across the PowerShot N. It is so quirky in its controls and features that I instantly found myself way beyond my photographic comfort zone. I started taking pictures at odd angles, (the tilt LCD is a big help here), I took them for no particular reason, I took a lot. The camera just begged to be used in weird and chaotic ways.I initially thought that the camera's quirkiest feature, which allows the camera to take not only the picture you wanted but then goes on to take 5 shots of its own using random color temperatures, filters, and zoom positions, was a useless marketers gadget. But that was conservative mindset so I forced myself to turn it on and experiment. Most of the time the random shots are pretty poor or uninteresting, but about ten percent of the time I find that the camera has found a perspective and image setting so far beyond what I would ever have thought of that it verged on brilliant.So, as a creative tool I cannot speak highly enough of the camera, but there are some things that bother me.I find myself accidentally triggering the touch screen and messing up either a menu setting or even preventing the camera from taking a shot.The shutter trigger areas on the front lens ring are a little too small for me and not prominent enough for reliable blind shooting.But the biggest problem is how Canon has implemented the camera's ability to network. Technically I suppose it is great but for the life of me I have never read such a confusing user manual. It suffers from the greatest sin in technical writing; referring the user to different pages during a procedure. So, you start to read about how to connect to lets say your home network; Step 2 might want you to jump 14 pages ahead to read about something. Then while there you might be sent back 5 pages before where you started and so on.The manual also commits the technical writing sin of never explaining why you have to do such and such, or what the effect of any options might be, or any explanation for why something may or may not work.I am pretty comfortable around networks but Canon's user manual is just a dog's breakfast.That said, I now have a superior camera linked to my smartphone (Nexus 4) so I do not have to use the very poor camera in the phone for Twitter, G+ etc.And I really do think this quirky little piece of experimental camera technology has really helped me to break out of my self imposed creative straitjacket.I like it a great deal for that.Rick GrantCalgary
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

16.12.2015

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

The product description mentions that this fits SONY A6000. It DOES NOT. Attaching a picture of the original SONY Lens Cover next to the one I received. I DID get the product on time but what good is it if it doesn't fit?? I will be changing my rating if/once I get the right product.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

06.10.2012

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

For the past 2 years I looked at the Canon SX-series cameras, but being a person who can only be happy with a lithium-battery camera, I shied away from these. So I finally went for it after reading the AA battery life is getting better. If you buy some rechargeables, preferably Eneloops, you will be happy enough.PROS:* Takes EXCELLENT CRISP, SHARP photos with TRUE COLORS, and also GREAT MACRO (close-up) shots. (I have taken some grainy photos while playing around with it, but they were my fault due to low light without the flash being up).* Larger than an ultra-compact camera, easy to grip, yet not so large where it's a drag to carry with you - this camera feels comfortable - if you have larger hands or fingers, you won't accidentally push the wrong buttons, plenty of room - I have short, stubby fingers and short nails as I do a lot of typing, those ultra-compact cameras were wrong for me!* Very pleased with battery life; I've taken over 250 shots and a couple of videos with the Eneloops, they're still going strong (the alkaline AA batteries included w/camera did not last long) - for Eneloops - see my link below.* The Image Stabilization turns off automatically when you attach the camera to a tripod, something I always forget to do with other cameras (AUTO mode).* When you have this zoomed out to 16X, the stabilization seems to work better than other cameras I've used (the more you zoom out, the shakier it is); normally on other cameras I'd have to use a tripod.* You can optically zoom during a video, audio does not cut out during the zooming function. Zoom motor is VERY quiet once you press the video/movie button, it becomes almost silent - the way it does this amazes me.* Easy for anyone to use in AUTO; and this also has full P/A/S/M manual controls, so this is a camera you can grow into if you are a novice.* Has a Mode Dial - some cameras, including Canon's cheaper models, are removing the dial on top of the camera and changing to a menu-only format.CONS:* Shutter response time is a little slow, probably due to the AA batteries (I'm using a Class 10 SD card, so it isn't that). Not sure if you would be happy with this camera if you are trying to capture fast moving kids or pets; if you can get them to hold still for a few seconds, it's fine.* Build-quality: It's plastic, but if you are careful with your cameras you should be OK. The battery compartment door seems a little more robust than cheaper Canon models I looked at, it has a spring, unlocks and slides out to the side. Plastic tripod mount (ugh!, why couldn't they use metal?)* This camera can't be put into your pocket, it needs a case. Also, a camera this size needs a neck strap, not a flimsy little hand strap like the one in the box.* The 230,000 pixel LCD screen doesn't impress me, I've purchased cheaper cameras that have 460,000 pixels. You may be unhappy with photo quality when viewing it on the LCD, and pleasantly surprised after you upload the photo to your PC.RANDOM THOUGHTS:1. My camera was made in JAPAN! Not to say yours will be; I know with Panasonic cameras sometimes the same model will come from different countries. I don't know about Canon.2. I've yet to find a P&S digital camera that is perfect. This one isn't perfect either, so it got 4 stars. You have to weigh the pros & cons for YOUR specific needs in a camera. I've tried other cheaper, basic Canon's, and I either returned them or re-gifted to friends.3. There are strap openings on both sides of this camera, but they are so small they will only accommodate those small loops like wrist straps have. I think I found a neck strap that will work, see my link below. I've got one on order now.4. I uploaded a short video to YouTube, I am Yarii41 on YT; if you do a search for "Canon SX160 Video Test" you should find it. I can't put the link here, since links to other sites aren't allowed in our reviews.ENELOOP BATTERIES: Sanyo XX Battery Powered by eneloop, 2500mAh typical / 2400 mAh minimum High Capacity, 4 Pack AA Ni-MH Pre-Charged Rechargeable BatteriesCANON CASE: Canon PSC-3300 Deluxe Soft Case for Canon SX130IS Digital CamerasCLASS 10 SD CARD: Transcend 16 GB SDHC Class 10 Flash Memory Card TS16GSDHC10ENECK STRAP: OP/TECH USA 2201021 Bin/Op Strap-QD- for Compact Cameras and Binoculars -Neoprene (Black)
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

07.07.2015

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I bought this for my Panasonic DMC-TZ60 digital camera, which only came with a charger cable which would charge the battery if it was actually inside the camera - which was annoying as you weren't able to charge the camera and use it at the same time... then I ended up losing the charger cable too! So this product was exactly what I needed - having the advantage of being able to charge the battery without it having to be inside the camera while being charged! Also, having the car cigarette light charger cable is a real bonus too! This product charges the battery just fine, and at a very good price too! It came with both a UK and a European mains cable as well - which would be useful for anyone wanting to charge their camera batteries when on holiday in Europe. So, excellent value for money, for an excellent product!
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

11.12.2015

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

There may be inconsistency in the manufacturing because the one I received would not fit onto my Sony A7ii. Didnt want to twist any harder in fear of breaking something in the camera. The replacement adapter from Fotasy worked perfectly.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

16.11.2015

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I bought this camera before a trip to Africa and got some of the best photographs in my group. Since then I have used it to take many thousands of real estate photographs. It continues to outperform the SLRs used by the other agents yet is incredibly simple. Outstanding camera.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

30.07.2015

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

The adapter I received put out nearly 5 volts instead of the claimed 3.15v. The one time the camera turned on it had a distorted screen. While it appears no permanent damage was done to the camera the adapter only worked the one time before I tested it. The company gave a no hassle refund hence the 3 stars. If I could I would give 1 star for the product and 5 for customer service. That being said they sounded pretty confident that I just received a bad one which does happen from time to time when purchasing discounted electronics at the lowest price available. I took a gamble and while the product didn't work out the company did make it right.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

17.12.2014

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I've had this camera for about 4 years, so I've spent a lot of time with it and can definitely attest to its high quality and durability. Canon is an exceptional brand and if you can't afford a DSLR or you want something more compact to carry around - then this is a really good option.

This camera has many manual settings, it lets you select everything from ISO speed to the white balance in the picture. You can take multiple consecutive shots, stitch photos together and it even has a setting for "micro" photos such as close ups of plants or bugs. Like other reviewers have stated, it does take a long time to load after using flash and it doesn't do well when there's not a lot of light. To take a picture without a lot of light you really need to use some type of tripod or improvise and set it on top of something so that you can adjust the ISO speed and the picture doesn't come out fuzzy. I played around with it a lot and I've found a balance. I can take pictures without a lot of light without much of a problem, but if you're new to photography, then it may take you some time.

This camera also goes through batteries very quickly! You really need to have an extra pair with you at all times. I use Duracel rechargeable batteries, and it isn't too much of an inconvenience. I just charge all 4 batteries before I go hiking, and that's normally enough to last the camera the whole trip.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

28.12.2013

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I am 62 years old and I have always had film or digital SLR cameras since I was in my 20's since I had considered point and shoot cameras to be inferior and not worth the photo lab or printing cost. Currently I am happy with my Canon DSLR t2i except for the size and weight. There are times when I am traveling light and I needed a compact camera but it has to provide near DSLR quality photos because I am spoiled with the great photos from my t2i. My photos must be perfect because I tend to enlarge them to 36 by 24 and hang them in my living room for my visiting guests to admire. One of my guest thought that some of my photos were taken by a professional and not by my Canon t2i.While reading consumers report, the G15 was one of the recommended compact camera so I did my research on this camera and concluded that at $299 to $399, you can't go wrong. After using it for a month, I was so happy with this purchase that I purchased a second G15 for my brother as a gift.Here are my favorite features: (1) programmable C1 and C2 settings on the top dial that instantly recalls my favorite settings without going thru the menu settings again. (2) If the flash is in the popup position, it will always flash and if the flash is retracted, it won't. (3) The top exposure compensation dial to lighten or darken the photos which you can do very quickly. (4) flash output compensation to increase output to extend the reach of the flash or reduce the output to minimize flash washout of the subject. (5) The three inch screen is stunning and even better than my Canon t2i. (6) Generally, it has most of the controls of my Canon DSLR t2i but the G15 controls are more user-friendly and intuitive. It seems like Steve Jobs must have designed this camera for a serious photographer like me who needed to set the camera settings as quickly as possible without fumbling thru the various menus. (7) The resulting photos are near DSLR quality which I thought was amazing given the compact size.While the photos are not quite DSLR quality and results are very close. There are better cameras than the G15 but not one of them is a better value for the money that you will pay. This camera is a perfect complement for people who already have a DSLR camera and needed a more compact camera with near DSLR quality. For those buyers who don't want an DSLR camera, then this is the compact camera to get. Five stars easily but I would give it 6 stars because I paid only half the price of my Canon t2i and this camera is so user-friendly. To appreciate the photos, you should transfer the photos to a 10 inch ipad with retina display.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

30.12.2014

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

I purchased mine at BestBuy. I also owned a previous PowerShot.

I have owned three Canon Powershot cameras. Two of these lasted for the warranty period, and then returned lens errors. The third was not used much because of the tilted and inferior images.

Canon refuses to acknowledge the lens error problem (check the forums) and will charge over $150 to repair. They always claim that the problem is abuse by the owner. A camera repairman told me the problem is almost always a faulty sensor. Worse, I recommended the camera to friend - who now has the same issue: Lens Error, which make the camera unusable. I believe the upper-end SLR cameras are still good, but the Powershot series has had a problem.

I love the camera menu and layout better than Nikon. However, Nikon has remained dependable for me. After multiple Powershot lens errors without support from Canon, I don't dare buy another. My first Powershot took super-great pictures, my second took very poor pictures, and this camera took good pictures (not super, but good). I always use the more expensive professional-type SD cards. To follow Canon's response, this camera is not capable of regular use (fragile). I would like to know if anyone has had a similar problem with the latest Powershot product... I really like the look & feel, but I need something dependable.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

13.01.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Hello Everyone,First off to those who wish to post a review you NEED to actually use the Camera not read other reviews then post a bogus review. This camera was purchased at a store and I have now had it for a little less than a week. Now for a sub $200 camera this is an amazing little gem. Play around with all the settings, make a slide show like did and post it to youtube like I did if you look under this camera its title will state Canon SX160 slide show. The macro settings are great, the zoom can actually be aided up to 64x through the digital assistance.The battery life is very short if you use the conventional AA batteries however if you pick up a charging unit the life will excel far greater than the regular ones. The Macro setting on this little camera is great, for what you get and pay, remember this is an affordable budget camera and point and shoot.Play around with the settings, like I have and you will find a host of features that this camera offers. There is a (slow motion) feature on the video program in (playback mode) that is so cool. I am no expert I am no Pro and I am no certified photographer however I am inquisitive enough to explore the options this camera has to offer.The Intelligent Auto setting is for the (lazy people) play around with the Manual (M) setting or program (P) setting and venture into other areas for higher quality photos.The Image Stabilization on this little fellow is awesome and the video is only 720HD not 1080HD and there is a vast difference with the two qualities. If you are taking videos of something and need maximum zoom with digital assist you will need either a Monopod, tripod or sturdy base mount for no vibrations period. Play around with the ISO range it is pretty wide from 100-1600 now that is awesome for a small inexpensive camera such as the Canon SX160 ISI highly recommend getting a screen protector even though it may alter the clarity somewhat however if you drop it and scratch the LCD well it is now compromised.16 X Optical Zoom scores a 10 not a 5 for the Digital assist is astonishing in this tiny camera wow (64x max with digital)16 Mp quality is good not great720HD video is good for the moneyFlash works well enoughPrograms on camera are greatEase of use is wonderful once you know what you are doing(no microphone adjust) this is a shame unless it is on here and I just cannot find it.Meaty camera that has some weight not feeling like it will blow away in the windImage Stabilization is wonderful, impressive on a camera so smallYes I would highly recommend this to another !!
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

27.08.2015

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

The lens hood when securely screwed into the adapter for the standard 16-50mm lens on an a6000 has the longer extensions on either side of the lens, which actually blocks a portion of the photo frame at the wide angle end of the zoom range. The longer extensions should be aligned at the top and bottom of the lens, but there is no way to do that without partially unscrewing the adapter and hood from the lens.

The pinch lens cap I received didn't fit anything--not the 16-60 lens, or the outer rim of the lens hood.
Отзыв предоставлен
Profile no image

Скроменый эксперт

15.10.2015

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I specifically sought out a brand of Camera that would accept my many Minolta lens and filter's. I was more than over joyed when I got my new Sony a6000 and was able to use my 200mm telephoto lens on my new camera ,thanks to this adapter ring. I have used it successfully a few dozen times with great success, thank you for the great product
Отзыв предоставлен
Показаны отзывы 2281-2304 из 10038.

Похожие товары с лучшей оценкой

9.9/10 баллов

Nikon D810

198 отзывов

от 143513.00 руб.

9.8/10 баллов

Nikon Z6 Kit

115 отзывов

от 276890.00 руб.

9.8/10 баллов

Sony Alpha ILCE-7M3 Kit

189 отзывов

от 185000.00 руб.

9.8/10 баллов

Nikon D750 Body

592 отзывов

от 128874.00 руб.

9.8/10 баллов

Canon EOS 5D Body

645 отзывов

от 114051.00 руб.

9.8/10 баллов

Nikon D7500 Body

77 отзывов

от 91074.00 руб.

9.7/10 баллов

Nikon D6

107 отзывов

от 1369231.00 руб.

9.7/10 баллов

Canon EOS 50D Kit

170 отзывов

от 1075533.00 руб.

9.7/10 баллов

Nikon D750 Kit

234 отзывов

от 164499.00 руб.

9.7/10 баллов

Canon EOS 600D

593 отзывов

от 53374.00 руб.

9.6/10 баллов

Nikon D850

108 отзывов

от 238990.00 руб.

9.6/10 баллов

Sony Alpha ILCE-6400

184 отзывов

от 99990.00 руб.

9.6/10 баллов

Canon EOS 1100D

472 отзывов

от 27000.00 руб.

9.6/10 баллов

Nikon D3100

1621 отзывов

от 23805.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Pentax K-1 Mark II Kit

724 отзывов

от 448990.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Panasonic Lumix DC-S1H

89 отзывов

от 229990.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Sony Alpha ILCE-7M4

77 отзывов

от 201999.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Fujifilm X-T30 II Kit XC15-45mm, серебр

77 отзывов

от 142690.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Canon EOS 77D Kit

280 отзывов

от 94980.00 руб.

9.5/10 баллов

Canon EOS 7D Mark II Body

205 отзывов

от 93000.00 руб.