Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
10040 отзывов пользователей o Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
Пользовались
Canon PowerShot SX160 IS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
The trick new features like evaluative color balance and the histogram-in-viewfinder are easy and intuitive to use, but it's that incredible lens that really makes the package. It's not perfect - any lens that's so compact has to have some chromatic aberration: there's purple fringing visible in high-contrast areas of the images. It all depends on how closely you look, and how picky you are. But it's a fair trade, considering that the long lens allows me to capture images that I couldn't even consider with the average DSLR. Not to mention that the size, weight, and cost of DSLR's means that they stay home on most casual outings.
Go ahead and price a stabilized 500mm lens for your SLR, and after you recover from fainting, you'll appreciate how much this little guy offers for the price. Amazingly, I paid exactly the same for my new SX10 IS that I did for my S2 IS several years ago.
Downsides: I miss the time-lapse feature, or "Intervalometer." The package is heavier than my old S2 IS. And there's that fringing visible in outdoor shots.
Upsides: 20X, low price, fast & intuitive controls, and zero shutter lag. It's also nice to use SD cards and AA batteries.
I am still learning how to use this camera. It is taking a while, because I have a 3 year old and a 1 year old, but I use the camera all the time.
All of the pictures, if viewed at 100% of their size, had blurred or softened edges on picture frames, edges of houses, lamp shades, etc. The smaller I made the picture, the less noticeable it became but it still was not clear. I don't know if this is what is referred to as noise but I do not want to have to adjust the sharpness of every picture I take with editing software.
Based on so many good reviews, I began to think that I must have gotten a defective camera and returned it to the chain store in my home location. I purchased another A590IS from Amazon. In the mean time, I read all the instructions for the different settings so that I would understand how to use it. I did not want the poorness of pictures to be operator error.
When the new camera arrived, I took comparison pictures. I had the same results. The colors are good but the sharpness is not there. I took identical shots with my old HP and with the new Canon. The Canon has good color and the pictures are larger but the definition and quality of the image is just not there.
THIS CAMERA IS AMAZING. THE MACRO PHOTOS WERE CLEAR AND SHARP. THE 20X ZOOM WAS A WOW!!! THE VIDEO IS TERRIFIC TOO.
I KNOW I AM GOING TO ENJOY THE FREEDOM OF CLOSEUP AND ZOOM WITHOUT CHANGING LENSES.
IF YOU ARE LOOKING FOR A CAMERA WITH ALL THE CONTROLS OF A DSLR WITHOUT THE HASSLE OF CARRYING EXTRA LENSES THEN THIS IS THE CAMERA FOR YOU.
FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVE ALMOST LOST THE LENS CAP JUST ADD A CAP KEEPER AND THIS WILL SOLVE THE PROBLEM.
THIS IS A GREAT BUY FOR THE MONEY AND YOU WON'T BE DISAPPOINTED.
1. It had an excruciatingly long shutter lag compared to my "old" kodak easy share. I couldn't ever get off shots in time to catch my 1 year old doing something cute. And, if she moved...like all kids do...the shots came out blurry. I even had it on the setting for kids and pets. Also I had the SDHC card in it.
2. No matter what I did (yes, I read the manual) I kept getting photos that looked very poorly focused. Not even as crisp as my 4 megapixel.
3. With the flash on, people were washed out, with it off, they were in dark shadows. There seemed no happy medium.
4. The "face finder" feature made getting a shot off take too long.
5. The color in photos seemed off...not natural.
6. The menus just were not all that easy to follow or intuitive, at least to me, from other cameras I have used in the past.
I have been taking photos for 25 years and am used to getting really great shots. That just didn't happen with this camera. It was pretty frustrating. Maybe it is great for things that don't move, like flowers, but for anyone wanting to catch their kids before the moment is gone, maybe this camera is not for you.
I am heartbroken that after only 3 years of ownership, it is broken beyond repair. I did initially have problems with the lens cover not closing as other reviewers did, but usually if I took the battery out and charged it and then returned it the cover would close. Recently I accidentally leaned on it in my backpack. It was in a protective camera case, but the pressure of my back against my backpack broke the display screen. I took it to a repair shop and was told that to repair it would cost about $20 less than buying a new camera on Amazon. I am very dissapointed that it seems that these cameras are so throw away. Why can't canon control parts costs so that repairs can be made and cameras salvaged. Anyways, I am going to add to the landfill situation and toss my camera and buy a new one. I want a canon, but with the parts situation and lack of repair facilities I may have to look at another brand. Too bad.
Last night, it was knocked from my hands - lens extended - and fell down a flight of brick steps. It returned a lens error message to me, and wouldn't turn on. Today, a friend of mine popped the lens back into place (it had apparently bent at an unhealthy angle), and it's back to working like it did on Christmas Day.
In short, I love this camera. My only recommendation would be to make sure you get good batteries, as mine seems to have slowly lost its edge with battery life over time. But that aside, this wonderful camera seems to be nearly indestructible, and takes great pictures to boot. Cannon has won a lifetime customer.
Cons: 1) After 5 months, a tiny plastic piece broke off inside the battery door and it won't stay closed (must send camera to Canon), 2) No lens cap tether, 3) Can't seem to find a polarizing filter for it, possibly because this is not an SLR camera with live viewfinder?, and 5) Does not shoot in RAW format.
I would still rate this camera best in its class, absolutely. The next step would be a much more expensive DSLR.
it really is amazing what $120 can buy you these days. photography enthusiasts on a budget will love the features. the camera has fully manual capability and a really nice layout and menu design. it shows you the shutter and aperture settings its using when you depress the shutter. in program mode you can just shoot, or you can adjust exposure, ISO, white balance, flash exposure as you like. its clearly produced by a company thats always refining its products to be more flexible without being unecessarily complicated.
the camera is well designed and responsive. if it could only shoot raw and had live histogram id give it an A+ for features.
the bad news is its still a cheap camera. the sensor is small and fairly noisy. frankly im a bit disappointed in that regard. the pictures look good in general terms but when you zoom in to 100% they are noisy and compressed looking in general, with high ISO pictures being really bad (mind you i usually shoot RAW images with a larger camera).
the only consolation is knowing that other cameras at this price are the same if not worse. but you really dont want to shoot in low light with this thing, it looks like a damn snowstorm.
if your camera budget is $150, i absolutely recommend this camera. if image quality is important and you can spend more, its may be worth it to do so... but you may have to spend considerably more to see any improvement.
I used a Fujica AX-3 35mm outfit for years but did not want the hastle of carrying around numerous lenses etc... This camera allows me to play in manual mode, and my wife to snap away in auto and both receive great results. My sunpack flash even works on the hot shoe if I need some extra umph in low light.
Rechargable AA battereis last about 200 shots or more and the display may be turned off to increase this. However the display does not seem to draw so much power that this is worth doing. The AA battereis make this camera larger than some other Canons, but I prefer the AAs due to their general availabity when on vacation. One set of lithium batteries may be used to fill an 8gig card without replacement.
The graphite fiber plastic body is more robust than the metal body used in the A570ISs that I also have that tends to show dents from heavy use.
The only feature that could be improved upon with this camera is the focal length of the zoom lens. I would also recommed the SX110 that I purchased for its 10x zoom lens.
The video fuction of this camera is also great, and better than video cameras in that it isa full 640x480 at 30 frames per second. Normal video cameras are not as good for viewing on the computer due to "interlacing" that prevents fozen images from being sharp.
The Canon A590IS is a very good value.
I have shot almost 900 pictures in the four weeks I've had the SX10, but am still learning many of its controls and capabilities. I've discarded about 5% of the shot I've taken due mainly to poor exposure or focus, but have learned how to aim the focusing points and exposure metering properly to eliminate those problems.
My previous cameras were: Nikon FM2, Canon RebelG (35mm), Canon A70, Canon A75, and Canon SD600. The SX10 reminds me of the RebelG in terms of flexibility and ease of use.
I like Canon's use of AA batteries and SDHC memory cards, both of which are inexpensive and readily available. I was able to get a pair of Sandisk 8gb Extreme II and 3 Sandisk 4gb Extreme III SDHC cards for under $25 each during Black Friday sales, which should be more than sufficient for any future trips I take.
I would strongly recommend this camera to anyone looking for a feature-packed point & shoot that is willing to sacrifice camera size for capability.
It also has a range of semi and fully automatic settings which the beginner can use constantly and still get top class results. Remember, the camera features the IS (image stabilisation) system, and Canon's is widely acclaimed to be the best. (Helps to prevent blur in shots where a slower shutter speed, and/or telephoto is being used). This will buy you approx two stops when handholding the camera - in other words, if you are using 1/125th second to shoot, the system will produce an image equating to use of 1/500th (125 - 250 - 500, two stops).
I do a lot of macro and landscape work, often tripod mounted, so the Aperture priority mode is my usual favourite - I can control depth of field (what is in focus, and what is not, along a line drawn from the lens to the very background of the photograph - the smaller the aperture, the more that is in sharp focus, but sometimes you want to isolate a subject from it's background by using a large aperture, throwing everything out of focus, apart from the subject).
This camera is my first serious digital camera, and as a pre existing user of a Canon A1 35mm camera for many years, this one does everything my A1 could, and also has a wonderful ten times optical zoom, nine megapixels, and a large bright 3" LCD monitor, coupled with a very easy menu system (takes a little learning, like all such cameras).
I can't wait to see what the next new model features are - but this one produces great photographs, and is definitely as professional as you are - good job Canon, thank you!
Without a viewfinder some brighter lighting conditions make it harder to see what you are shooting but more frequently it is not a problem. The telephoto lens is great.
Use of a padded case would be wise to protect the viewscreen during periods of non use.
The software for transfer to your computer is automatic and relatively quick.
The camera has a much better battery life than my previous Canon. I hope it will continue to be so.






