Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
10038 отзывов пользователей o Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
Пользовались
Canon PowerShot SX160 IS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Скроменый эксперт
26.04.2015
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Maybe I just got lucky with this one but it fits the camera and lens perfectly whereas several of my other adapters are somewhat tight or lose.
Скроменый эксперт
18.03.2015
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Sorry! It broke, last year. Other than that?
Beyond warranty, and the lens got stuck, at the "on" position. For the repair price? To me? It wasn't worth repairs.
Other than that? Easy camera to operate. Downloading to a PC, is effortless. Good pictures, too!
Beyond warranty, and the lens got stuck, at the "on" position. For the repair price? To me? It wasn't worth repairs.
Other than that? Easy camera to operate. Downloading to a PC, is effortless. Good pictures, too!
Скроменый эксперт
02.04.2015
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I've had no issues with this adapter. It solidly attaches to my A7R and the design well-matches my Rokkor lenses. No issues with light leaks. I couldn't imagine any benefits to an adapter costing a penny more than this.
Скроменый эксперт
20.03.2015
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Simple product, works great paired with my Minolta MD lens. I would definitely buy more if the need for additional ones comes up.
The only con is it doesn't come with a rear lens cap so I can't keep it mated to my lens because I don't have a spare cap.
The only con is it doesn't come with a rear lens cap so I can't keep it mated to my lens because I don't have a spare cap.
Скроменый эксперт
02.10.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Updated 9/25/13The first thing I noticed when I took the G15 out of its box for the first time was its impressive build quality. Everything is tightly constructed and what feels like a tough mag alloy body. It's not necessarily pocketable but is slightly smaller and thinner than the G12. One minor complaint, however, is that the handgrip up front seems shallower than on the G12 so at first it doesn't feel as comfortable to grip. The battery is of a good size and the camera gets excellent battery life.The control layout on the back of the camera is the same as the G12 and G1X, generally straight-forward and logically placed. The menu system has not changed at all from previous models... so if you're coming from the G12, you should be able to locate where everything is rather quickly. You have the function button for the most commonly accessed settings and the menu button for all other settings. The LCD on back, while sadly, not articulated like on the G12 is gorgeous...very bright and clear. The viewfinder is the same small one found in the G1X and G12..but it works okay when you can't use the LCD.Canon promised improved AF performance over the G12 and it is most certainly quicker. It isn't the fastest in its class but it does have reliable AF and no problems even in low light locking on. Most folks will find it perfectly satisfactory. Lens performance is quite snappy though, and you can zoom in and out relatively quickly. The camera also has some of the most rock solid image stabilization on any camera I have seen.The image quality that this camera produces is excellent considering its sensor size. You can of course wring out more detail out of your photos if you shoot RAW. But the JEPGS are excellent as well. Color performance is excellent. It produces punchy but accurate colors and the lens is decently sharp at all focal lengths. Noise is well controlled through ISO400 but you can still get decent results up through ISO1600, especially if you shoot RAW and don't blow the photos up to huge sizes. However, with the fast lens, you may never need to go that high. My one minor gripe with this camera is that it overexposes at times. You can correct that problem very quickly though by dialing in some negative exposure compensation. But overall, I think most people will find the photos that this camera produces very nice.I have not messed much with the movie mode but it has a few manual controls. One feature that stuck out to me is the 1280x720 HD iframe recording, which can be imported right into Apple video editing software without losing any of its quality. If this feature is important to you...the new G16 does not have this feature so it might be worth sticking with the G15.Judged by image quality alone, the Sony RX100 models are at the top of the enthusiast point and shoot heap. But if you're not interested in plunking down $650-$750, this camera offers a well-rounded shooting experience and will probably give you many years of dependable operation and great photos. This camera is soon to be replaced by the G16, which will command a $100 price premium over this model. The G16 is an overall much faster camera with about the same photo quality (maybe slightly improved high ISO performance), but if you're fine with slower AF and don't need the high burst rate of the G16, I would save your money and get the G15.
Скроменый эксперт
29.07.2012
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Reviewed 7/29/2012
I have owned this camera since spring 2008. I mainly wanted a camera with image stabilizer with decent zoom. I mainly use it for everyday pics and for concert settings. I needed something that does well in lowlight settings. With flash I'd say 80% of the pics are very clear in a lowlight setting. Without flash I'd say it drops down to about 60%.
The video is decent. There is some noise when taking video at such a place as a concert. Especially when watching on the camera itself. On a computer the video sounds much better and the picture quality is pretty clear. But don't try zooming while shooting the video. It will blur the picture. Also I find sometimes the video will blur while taking even not zooming. It's really a 50/50 shot.
The zoom is pretty good. I can be about halfway back in a concert crowd in a small venue and still get good pics. But don't try going beyond the 4x zoom into digital. It will blur the farther off the 4x you go.
I love the big LCD screen, definitely a huge plus.
Love the AA battery. I hate non standard batteries. I've had friends who their cameras have run out of battery life in the middle of a concert. So replaceable batteries are a must. I guess it really doesn't have good battery life. I can't give an estimate but I probably had to change the batteries at least once during a concert (which includes taking pictures earlier in the day as it's usually a road trip to the show). But it never really bothered me. I just carried a couple extra spares.
I can't comment on the different settings, as I only ever used auto and video modes. They worked well enough for me.
The flash will take a minute to recharge between pics. This can be annoying, especially at a concert (or I would assume when trying to capture children). You have to hold the flash down for a couple seconds before it takes the pic. Between pics also takes a couple seconds. The screen will go black until it's ready for the next pic.
The camera is a nice size. Not huge and bulky, but not very small either. For me it's a perfect size. I will miss this camera as it's served it's purpose quite well for my average uses.
A couple problems I've had. I'd say a little over 2 years or so after I bought it the battery compartment wouldn't shut all the way. I had to put a hairband around it to keep the battery compartment closed. But it still didn't close completely, resulting in a low battery warning all the time. Finally, my camera has hit its end. It will no longer even stay on for more than a couple minutes. Even with fully charged batteries. and just about a week ago my flash stopped working.
I must admit I am hard on cameras. This one has been in my purse, in my pocket at shows, has been dropped, etc. So for the abuse it has taken I think it's lasted a good length of time.
Honestly for the price, I wouldn't buy it. I got mine for $160 four years ago at a local retail store. It was on sale at the time and was originally $250. I can't believe how much the price is now for such an old model. I really wouldn't spend the money and buying a used one would be just as bad, as with my experience the more it's used the less it'll last and you'll end up having to buy another camera a year or 2 later.
If you can find it new for no more than $180 then I'd say that's a decent deal. But when I saw over $400 here I was flabbergasted.
[...]. I never review stuff and I really put thought into this to help others.
I have owned this camera since spring 2008. I mainly wanted a camera with image stabilizer with decent zoom. I mainly use it for everyday pics and for concert settings. I needed something that does well in lowlight settings. With flash I'd say 80% of the pics are very clear in a lowlight setting. Without flash I'd say it drops down to about 60%.
The video is decent. There is some noise when taking video at such a place as a concert. Especially when watching on the camera itself. On a computer the video sounds much better and the picture quality is pretty clear. But don't try zooming while shooting the video. It will blur the picture. Also I find sometimes the video will blur while taking even not zooming. It's really a 50/50 shot.
The zoom is pretty good. I can be about halfway back in a concert crowd in a small venue and still get good pics. But don't try going beyond the 4x zoom into digital. It will blur the farther off the 4x you go.
I love the big LCD screen, definitely a huge plus.
Love the AA battery. I hate non standard batteries. I've had friends who their cameras have run out of battery life in the middle of a concert. So replaceable batteries are a must. I guess it really doesn't have good battery life. I can't give an estimate but I probably had to change the batteries at least once during a concert (which includes taking pictures earlier in the day as it's usually a road trip to the show). But it never really bothered me. I just carried a couple extra spares.
I can't comment on the different settings, as I only ever used auto and video modes. They worked well enough for me.
The flash will take a minute to recharge between pics. This can be annoying, especially at a concert (or I would assume when trying to capture children). You have to hold the flash down for a couple seconds before it takes the pic. Between pics also takes a couple seconds. The screen will go black until it's ready for the next pic.
The camera is a nice size. Not huge and bulky, but not very small either. For me it's a perfect size. I will miss this camera as it's served it's purpose quite well for my average uses.
A couple problems I've had. I'd say a little over 2 years or so after I bought it the battery compartment wouldn't shut all the way. I had to put a hairband around it to keep the battery compartment closed. But it still didn't close completely, resulting in a low battery warning all the time. Finally, my camera has hit its end. It will no longer even stay on for more than a couple minutes. Even with fully charged batteries. and just about a week ago my flash stopped working.
I must admit I am hard on cameras. This one has been in my purse, in my pocket at shows, has been dropped, etc. So for the abuse it has taken I think it's lasted a good length of time.
Honestly for the price, I wouldn't buy it. I got mine for $160 four years ago at a local retail store. It was on sale at the time and was originally $250. I can't believe how much the price is now for such an old model. I really wouldn't spend the money and buying a used one would be just as bad, as with my experience the more it's used the less it'll last and you'll end up having to buy another camera a year or 2 later.
If you can find it new for no more than $180 then I'd say that's a decent deal. But when I saw over $400 here I was flabbergasted.
[...]. I never review stuff and I really put thought into this to help others.
Скроменый эксперт
30.04.2015
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
was worried about finding a decent quality card for the older Canon. this buy wiped out that concern.
Скроменый эксперт
06.01.2014
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I bought Canon Power Shot N to take on my vacation in a few months. Having tried it for few days I have second thoughts on it and planning to return it.Pros: Slim and handy design, reasonable picture quality comparable with new smart phones. The flip display and touch screen are good features. Zoom and shutter rings around the lens are cool. Good zoom range (8x optical) with indication of optical and digital. Flip display and touch screen are useful features.Cons: Flip display moves only 90 degrees and not suitable for selfees. My main complain is its user interface. Despite the touch screen the navigation is very badly designed and has very poor usability. Many issues are annoying and some are painful. Even the printed ‘Getting Started Guide’ is poorly done.Multi-photo ‘creative shots’ feature is useless in my opinion. Very few people will use it and even then only a few times just to tryout. You have 5 pictures to delete every time you take a picture. A true multipicture feature would have been useful instead of camera deciding on parts of the scene to capture. Strangely this apparently useless feature is selected with a dedicated hardware mode switch. However, a useful feature such as slow-motion video is the last selection on the menu. Slow motion performance is nowhere near iPhone 5s. Very poor stabilization of videos and cannot recommend it for taking any videos. Shutter ring and the zoom ring are very close and one may shutter inadvertently while trying to zoom.Nice leather looking long carry strap, only if you like to carry this tiny camera like a ladies handbag.Note that the camera does not come with any memory at all and you need to buy a micro SD separately before you can even try the camera.
Скроменый эксперт
08.03.2015
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have been using this for years now and was just asked to review it. Love it, use it on vacations and for grandkids and even video of sailboat racing. Not waterproof but if used carefully on a boat no issues. Love the viewfinder and regular screen for aim and shoot.
Скроменый эксперт
28.02.2015
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
This is a great camera. It doesn't get much use today though because of the quality of phone and tablet photos. This camera in its case is not as convenient now as it was when I bought it. A good mobile phone is quicker and easier to use, and, in many cases, snaps a better picture.
Скроменый эксперт
18.02.2013
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I have an earlier-model PowerShot A570. I wanted to upgrade to this G15, thinking it would be an amazing way to upgrade, considering all the good reviews I found for it on the Internet. I got it out of the box and took a few photos in auto mode. From photo 1, everything in the corners of the photo skewed outward. This looked especially annoying with people's faces and with walls and curtains and hanging pictures. Ever see a person's face in a black hole warp? Get a person on the side of a photo taken with this camera.I emailed customer support, sure something was wrong with the camera. They tried to help, but nothing worked. I called technical support. They tried to help, but nothing worked, and they said I should send it in to the Canon service center on the east coast. I ponied up $18 in UPS charges to insure and send the thing--obliterating the savings I had gained by buying it form Amazon instead of an actual store. Canon held onto it so long, without a resolution, that the time passed when I could just return it to Amazon--so I can no longer return it, because of Canon. Finally they contacted me and said it might be barrel distortion, but that this was all within the specs for the camera. They asked me to describe the problem again. I did, and they said they would look at it again and get back to me.In the meantime, I looked up barrel distortion on the Internet (I did not previously know what that was) and found a couple of sites explaining that this thing is inherent to wide-angle zoom lenses, and that the only way to fix it is either to not take photos in wide angle, or to Photoshop it out using a lens filter. Well, you don't actually get a choice of taking a photo in wide angle or not with this camera, unless you zoom every photo, because the un-zoomed setting is always wide-angle. Also, Photoshop does not yet have a lens filter for this particular lens--Photoshop does have a lens filter for the G10 and G12, but the G15 lens is special because of its F1.8-F2.8 range. I tried using Photoshop to clean up some of my photos, but the G10 and G12 lens filters didn't work. And in any case, I shouldn't have to use Photoshop on every picture I take.Finally Canon decided to send me the camera back, about a week ago, well into the start of February, a month after I sent it in for repair. They did nothing to it. It still works the same. And I can't send it back to Amazon to get my money back.The camera does have excellent automatic light adjustment and battery charge life, far better than my A570. But my A570 takes far better pictures, since it does not warp people's heads into black holes.If you looking for a camera to take normal photos, DO NOT BUY THIS CAMERA. Only buy it if you intend to use it for wide-angle shots with the telltale barrel distortion, because that is what you will get.
Скроменый эксперт
11.03.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
The Canon D20 is a fun, rugged camera. Let me use my usual disclaimer, in the interest of fairness, and admit that there are many cameras and makers that deliver what they promise. It is more about what camera traits you are looking for. So, I would suggest to anyone looking to buy one to google 'camera trait search' and find out what else is available for your specific need.The Canon D20 is a fixed lens camera (point and shoot, some would say), with 12.1 resolution (megapixels), and a x5 zoom. The sensor size is 1/2.3 inch CMOS-type, which is standard for cameras of its class.It does not have a viewfinder, which, again, many in its class don't. The ISO rating, which is the gauge for how well it does in low light, is 3200. That rating is sufficient for most purposes. The video is a Full HD- that is 1980x1080 resolution. It does not have a hot shoe for an external flash option. That is not unexpected for its size and category. The LCD screen is a 461,000 resolution. The camera does not do RAW processing but you would need that only if you did not want to be limited by JPEG type storage. The burst rate is a reasonable 1.9 frames per second- for quick shots. The weight of the camera is a convenient 228 grams.Canon D20 comes with GPS, it is waterproof to 33 feet of depth, freezeproof, and shockproof.Overall, a fun camera for the outdoors. Having been into photography for a while, I do stress though that you do a camera trait search. That will also tell you more about what you want.
Скроменый эксперт
21.04.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I've had the G7 the G10 and now the G15. As a professional photographer I don't like to carry my expensive pro gear around when I'm out and about. Yet I want to have a camera on me at all times for personal shots, practice shots, and just having fun with my camera!The G7 was great. I bought the camera and canon case where I could loop the case to my belt and I had the camera with me at all times. It lasted about 3 years before the zoom lever spring broke. Fortunately I had bought an extended warranty and got the g10 as a free replacement. Good deal! The g10 came able to shoot RAW files and I used it quite a lot as I like to do some HDR photography and you need RAW files and a tripod for this. The biggest advantage though that I found of both these cameras is their Macro feature (able to shoot close up--just inches away from the subject). With the small sensor they give a lot of depth of field (more area in focus than even a pro macro lense!). I can copy text, or small objects, car parts, whatever with great clarity.The one downside to the G10 which was a 15 megapixel camera is that it had a lot of noise at 1600 ISO. I needed less noise when shooting indoors without using flash (shooting natural light). To offset the noise/grain in the image I used a software program to reduce it but typically the image would then look softer!Amazon allowed me to trade the G10 (which was still in good working order) and get approx. $100 off the price of a new G15. The G15 comes with a faster lense and has less noise at the higher ISO's and is slightly smaller in size. This is just what I wanted! It shoots great portraits in low light without flash.The G15 comes with a new pop-up flash and I cannot get any red eye when using it (which is just amazing!). I like that they have included a dedicated button for video and also I can now shoot HD video! They added a new dial for adjusting fstop and shutter speed which is great too! (before you had to jump through the menu's which was a pain).Lastly this camera and their new line of Canon Powershots now come with Smart Auto. Will go through 37 different program modes automatically picking the one that is best for your photography situation. If the subject is moving it knows to track it! If shooting close up it automatically goes into Macro mode! Etc...Etc. About the only time I found it not useful is when the subject is back lite! I had to pop the flash and manually force it to fire or I would get more of a sillouette.All in all this is a great camera and I would not be afraid to use it on a pro job as well. It is that good of a camera!
Скроменый эксперт
09.12.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I was desperate to find a quality camera which didn't rely on a screen for view finding. This one has a proper view finder capable of giving the photographer an accurate view under all conditions. I cannot understand why camera users tolerate screen-only view finding; it is terrible on bright days. This camera may be a dinosaur in the age of smart phones, but it is far better not just for the view finder, but because it stored pix on a smart card which can be removed for transfer of pix to computer or one's own or a store's printer.
Скроменый эксперт
11.03.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
The Canon N is an innovative, fun camera, focused on convenience. Let me use my usual disclaimer, in the interest of fairness, and admit that many cameras by reputable makers (and there are many) deliver what they promise. It is more about what camera traits you are looking for. So, I would suggest to anyone looking to buy one to google 'camera trait search' and get the whole picture.The Canon N is a fixed lens camera (point and shoot, some would say), with 12.1 resolution (megapixels), and a x8 zoom. The sensor size is 1/2.3 inch CCD-type, which is standard for cameras of its class.It does not have a viewfinder, which, again, many in its class don't. The ISO rating, which is the gauge for how well it does in low light, is 6400. That rating is sufficient for most purposes. The video is a Full HD- that is 1980x1080 resolution. It does not have a hot shoe for an external flash option. That is not unexpected for its size and category. The LCD screen is a 461,000 resolution. The camera does not do RAW processing but you would need only if you did not want to be limited by JPEG type storage. The burst rate is a reasonable 2.3 frames persecond- great for quick shots. The weight of the camera is a convenient 195 grams.Canon N comes with WiFi, and the LCD is both tiltable and touch-screen.Overall, a fun, convenient camera. Having been into photography for a while, I do stress though that you do a camera trait search. That will also tell you more about what you want.
Скроменый эксперт
25.11.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I originally bought this camera in January, '06 for around $350. It's very easy to use and takes great pictures even in Auto. There are options for anything from total control to no control, just like all the Powershot cameras I've seen. I really love the size and the swivel display. It's much easier than my DSLR setup and better shots than my iPhone (because of the photo options, f-stops, etc).
I'd accidentally given mine away a couple months ago. Went online to see the price was now $699! Then found a used one through Amazon in perfect shape for $100! In my pocket it goes!
I'd accidentally given mine away a couple months ago. Went online to see the price was now $699! Then found a used one through Amazon in perfect shape for $100! In my pocket it goes!
Скроменый эксперт
11.03.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Canon G15 does what it promises, and does it well. I have to admit, though, that many cameras by reputable makers (and there are many) deliver what they promise. It is more about what camera traits you are looking for. So, I would suggest to anyone looking to buy one to google 'camera trait search' and get the lay of the land.The G15 is a fixed lens camera (point and shoot, some would say), with 12.1 resolution (megapixels), and x5 zoom. Probably the most important point for this class of cameras is the sensor size, which is 1/1.7 inch CMOS-type. That is just a number, but one that matters. Most point and shoots have a 1/2.3 inch sensor, which is a couple of steps worse than the G15.It also has a viewfinder, which many don't. The ISO rating is 12,800 which makes it work better in low light. The video is a Full HD- that is 1980x1080 resolution. The camera gives you the option to control manually both the exposure and the focus. It does have an external flash option. That is a plus too, especially for portraits. The LCD screen has a 922,000 resolution, and the burst rate- for fast action- of 2.1 specified works fine. The camera also does RAW processing which would matter if you did not want to be limited by JPEG storage only. And all this with a fairly light camera weighing only 352 grams.Overall, great camera. Having been into photography for a while, I do stress though that you do a camera trait search. That will also tell you more about what you want.
Скроменый эксперт
19.02.2015
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This claims to be a Neewer mount adapter but when my product came in it is labeled as a FOTGA adapter, this is why I gave it 4 stars instead of 5.Does the job sits flesh up against the A6000. No problems with it. Does the job but it is not a Neewer lens mount like it claims to be.
Скроменый эксперт
02.07.2013
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Received as a gift purchased at Best Buy (paid $15 more than Amazon price).I was very excited to receive this camera on Father's Day, June 16, 2013. After reading the manual, we immediately took it on a trip to the west coast. We shot over 400 pictures using several different cameras while on the trip: the Canon SX160, a phone camera, and lesser model Canon. When we returned home and loaded the pictures on the PC, I was amazed to see how poorly the Canon SX160IS compared to the same pictures from other cameras. As an example, with pictures of the desert (i can send provide examples) the SX160 had a faded look to it and the clarity was just 'ok'...while the other pictures were vibrant and clear. With indoor pictures using a flash, they were very grainy even using the low light features...unacceptable. It would have gone unnoticed had we not had other pictures to compare to...taken at the same time at the same place. Because of my extreme disappointment, I decided to return the camera to Best Buy and get something else. I explained to them the camera did not take good pictures and I'd like refund. Since it was purchased on June 12, and I requested a refund on July 2 after I returned from vacation, I was told it was purchased 20 days ago which is beyond the 15-day policy. I proceeded to explain the camera wasn't functioning properly and I was very disappointed with the picture quality. The sales person took the camera, snapped a few pictures in the store and said "it is working fine". After escalating to the Store General manager, James Pascoe - store #587, and arguing with him for 10 minutes I was told "We just can't accept returns from people who don't want their cameras anymore". My options were to keep the camera or "have it serviced and Best Buy will 100% determine whether it takes good pictures" and that was it. I like to spread my business around and purchase locally as well as via the internet. Needless to say Bust Buy just made a very easy decision for me as I will NEVER purchase from them again after receiving this type of poor, unprofessional customer service - and not standing behind what they sell. I was hoping they would survive in this tough industry, but with policies and customer service like this Best Buy won't last much longer. Lesson learned: I'll stick with Amazon from now on...
Скроменый эксперт
19.06.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
As a semi-pro who's evolved from his own darkroom with multiple Nikon SLRs to just finding the best point and shoot out there, this one comes close. It does have many more "user defined features and options" than the Nikon L 610, both of which I own, but it fails in comparison to the Nikon in a number of very important areas. (You'll also see that the price for the SX160 is dropping weekly and is now below the Nikon L 610 as more buyers realize the shortcomings of this camera.)The 3" display is inferior. It has a measly 230,000 pixels, while all the other cameras in it's class- such as the Nikon L 610 have a razor sharp 460,000 dot display. Canon needs to fix this pronto. Your pictures will look much better than they show up on this Canon's muddy display. If you want a crisp display, buy the Nikon L 610.The Canon's CMOS, while the same size as the Nikon's- 1"x2.3" is not as sensitive for sharp pics in lower light without flash. At ISOs at or above 400, (e.g. taking pictures of the baby while she's asleep) the Canon's pictures are dim and dark compared to the Nikon L 610.The lag time between shots is noticeably longer with the Canon versus the Nikon using the same- and best available- SanDisk, class 10, 45MB/s, 16gig card - probably because the Nikon has a user defined menu/circuitry option to allow you to define the type of AA you're using-alkaline, rechargeable or lithium and take advantage of the lithiums superior capacity.This is a AA camera- which is it's charm. Forget all the review "noise" about alkaline AAs or AA rechargeable batteries, which will be an ongoing misery. Just get a big pack of Energizer Lithium Extreme 9X AA's from Amazon. A pair will last well over 200 shots with flash.The SX 160 has two strap attachment points on the camera, but sadly, Canon and also Nikon with their L 610, only ship a one point wrist strap. If you still want to buy this camera, or the Nikon, solve this this by ordering the Nikon AN-CP23 strap from Amazon. Minimal mass, tiny logos, tucks neatly in your bag and, most of all, lets you hang the camera around your neck!The very best case for the Canon SX 160 or the Nikon L 610, is the Tamrac 5292. Fits perfectly, holds 4 AAs, an extra card and your cable.The best 3" display protector for either, is the "GGS optical glass protector". Be aware of counterfeits- get it "fulfilled by Amazon."Enjoy!
Скроменый эксперт
08.03.2015
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have an older camera and could not find a memory card that would work in my camera. I realized that the new cards do not work in older camera's. Was very happy to see this on Amazon. It works perfect.
Скроменый эксперт
13.02.2015
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I bought this exact camera from Amazon in July 2009, and have been so pleased with it. I still have a lot to learn, but the basic taking of pictures is easy, and results are perfect. It works as well today as it did 6 years ago. Just proves, if it ain't broke - don't fix it.
Скроменый эксперт
04.03.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I've had the S120 for 2 weeks now and have put it thru it's paces .. my S95 was my constant companion in the years I used it and it performed flawlessly over 15,000 shutter clicks .. I still can't decide if I want to sell it ..There are plenty of pro reviews out there .. as well as a goodly number of reviews here on Amazon .. so, I'm not going to really review the camera other than to say, it is performing for me as flawlessly as my trusty S95 did ..What I am saddened by here in the review section is the number of folks that slam, and rate 3 stars or less, an otherwise fantastic camera .. because of things like the WI FI setup, or the focus assist lamp, or the battery charge life .. etc ..Learn the camera .. this is not a $70.00 point and shoot .. it is a highly advanced pocket cam that requires a degree of study and commitment .. it is a Photographers camera, first and foremost .. and although many of the issues that some have with it can be corrected by learning the camera, nothing can be gained by not learning the camera .. and yes, it requires a degree of commitment ..Myself, and I know it can be debated, however, I believe that the S120 is the best camera of it's type in the World today .. overall .. feature for feature and quality of photographs .. if you are willing to devote the time it requires to learn ..03_21_2014 ,, and let me add the ridiculous reviews that slam the CAMERA over the need to download a PDF manual ...
Скроменый эксперт
20.01.2015
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
While this does exactly what it's supposed to do, I have real problem in that it does not lock in place on my Sony MD camera. Because of this, it's easy for this to actually detach from the camera body (which is has) and fall off, exposing the delicate image chip to outside influences. I would NOT buy this item or recommend it to anyone.
Показаны отзывы 2449-2472 из 10038.
