Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
10038 отзывов пользователей o Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
Пользовались
Canon PowerShot SX160 IS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор








When everything came back, so did my Canon A620. I put batteries into it just to see what would happen. The first picture, until now, is still as good as it ever was. The water did no damage at all. Still using this camera frequently and still amazed every time I see the pictures.















Things I really like about my Canon SX110 compared to my Sony H7 and others . . .
1. Blur check feature on playback setting
2. The mode dial doesn't get accidentally turned as easy and mess up my pictures!!!!
3. The auto setting puts out better picture color in florescent light than the Sony did!!!
4. The auto setting chooses a lower ISO (200 vs 400) in low light giving less grainy pictures than the Sony!!
5. The view screen is bigger and has more pixels making it easier to tell if my printed results will be satisfactory!!
6. Image stabilization seems to work better than with the Sony
7. This camera is small enough to carry on my belt, in my coat pocket, or in my wife's purse
8. The cheaper price (counting a case, batteries, and cards, I spent $220 versus around $300
9. The lense cover is automatic instead of having to remember to take it off and put it on.
10. The manual settings are more easily navigated- e.g.the 2 click process to change ISO or face detection
11. Ability to erase a picture with two button pushes rather than three
12. The Program mode will hold it's settings even if you have changed the ISO, aperature, or shutter speed while in Manual mode (I missed good pictures because the Sony changed settings across the board)
The few things I don't like about my Canon SX110 compared to my Sony H7 and others . . .
1. The flash does not pop up automatically
2. The flash does not recharge as quickly
3. The zoom is shorter
4. There is no neck strap, but instead just a wrist strap
5. The memory card is inside the battery compartment so batteries can easily fall out while removing the card.
Concerning the flash, I just have to get in the habit of putting it up like I had to get in the habit of taking off the lens cap with the Sony. If I forget, the camera does tell me. Concerning the recharge time, I have to live with that, but you can take a non flash picture while waiting and there is some benefit to being able to use AA Alkalines in a pinch and cheap rechargeables the rest of the time. Concerning the zoom, I have yet to miss it and can always cut and crop. When I did zoom the full 15x on my Sony it seemed I always had color output and exposure problems anyway. Concerning the lack of a neck strap, a good camera bag will have one and you can add one to your camera too if you can find one like I had from a Sandisk flash drive. Concerning the battery compartment, I've found it easiest to hook the camera to the computer using the USB cord that I just leave attached to the computer, and that's a small price to pay for the ease of getting good picture output. On the same note, it would have been nice if the cord attached to the camera on the side opposite the grip of the camera.
A few other features some may dislike or miss with the Canon vs the Sony
1. The battery life is shorter
2. There is no viewfinder to use in bright light or to help conserve battery power
3. The flash is not as powerful
But none of the above bother me in the least. It's easy to carry extra Nimh AA batteries and I never used the viewfinder with my Sony to begin with nor on the other digital camera I had before it. As for the flash, even though I envision that I would use the extra power occasionally and did try it a few times with the Sony, that occasion is too rare to worry about. I was never happy with Sony's "green" and grainy output in such circumstances, so that makes it easier not to miss. Besides, Canon does sell an add on flash that one can use with this camera if he sees a need for it.
A few other features some may like about the Canon versus the Sony
1. On the fly red eye removal
2. The well chosen scene setting selections available with the twist of the dial and others easily accessible
3. The more popular and universal SD memory card versus Sony's propriety MS Pro Duo card
4. The easy setting that requires no camera know how except to pop up the flash, point, and shoot
That does it for a review from the perspective of a simple point and shoot guy. I hope it can help someone make the choice that will best mee
