Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
10040 отзывов пользователей o Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
Пользовались
Canon PowerShot SX160 IS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
If you want a nice point and shoot that does not give you trouble buy this.
Battery? you can buy any battery AA and you be set... you can be anywhere and get those batteries. Get the ones that are special for small electronics .... those last a looooot.
Only thing is that the camera is a bit slower in the dark. but is alright. this camera is not supposed to be for professionals.
I got this camera to replace my lost Nikon Coolpix (which I also loved). I was looking for a good quality camera that would take clear pictures, but had allot of useful features. I have been using it more and more now that I'm really getting into photography. This is the perfect camera if you are looking for clear good quality pictures, but like to keep things a little simpler. I was having fun taking pictures in sepia and black and white instead of having to change them on iPhoto. And the zoom is also very good.
The only thing I can complain about is the short battery life. Though mine dosen't usually run out in a couple of days, it will usually noly last a month or so (even if i'm not taking pictures every single day).
It could also be inproved with a viewfinder.
Other than that I am positivly thrilled with this camera.
You don't have to buy this camera right off the bat. Visit a Canon dealer and handle the camera. You'll buy it without hesitation.
1. El zoom: proporciona posibildiades de captura de imagenes fantasticas.
2. Las baterias: para los amantes de la aventura al aire libre en sitios hinospitos y para travesias de larga duracion, el uso de baterias del tipo AA permiten cambiarlas sin necesidad de contar con celdas de recarga solar.
3. La pantalla movil: sin palabras, solo debe usarse y se tendran imagenes previas y enfoques que de otra manera seria imposible incluso pensarlos...
4. Tan robusta, fuerte y resistente como aparenta ser: creanme, la he llevado a expedicioens espeleologicas, acesos a altas montañas, sitios de elevado nivel desertico y elevada humedad, condiciones de exrremo frio y aun es mi pieza favorita entre el equipaje.
5. Es liviana. Pese a su gran tamaño el peso realmente esmenor al que aparenta ser...
algun contra? la ubicacion de los controles en condiciones de baja iluminacion podrian mejorarse para hacerlos mas accesibles.Alguna especie de "flood light" podria ayudar.
Conclusion: altamente recomendada y, en mi caso particular, ahora es necesario trascender alas PRO de la misma serie....
You can install CHDK on this to get focus and zoom during video recording, longer exposures (takes perfect long exposures with the ISO 200 or below), RAW shooting, and better bad pixel removal. That's professional-ish, so it might not be for you. The camera is fine as-is.
I have had this camera for over a year, and have been completely satisfied with its performance. I paid $140, and was tempted to buy another when the price was $110. This camera is with me most of the time, and I have taken many thousands of images, with a `keeper' rate above 90%. I have used it to shoot almost anything, except for fast moving subjects or sports. Subjects have included, casual everyday moments, images for work, special events, family gatherings, my dog, and vacation memories.
As an avid user of Canon SLR's, I had been disappointed with the previous A series Powershot cameras I owned. The images did not have great colors, the zoom mechanism was clunky, the shutter delay was annoying, and it took a while to write to the memory card. All this changed with the A590IS. Color rendition is excellent, and the white balance settings work very well. The camera is not suitable for shooting action sports, but the autofocus is very reliable in most situations, including low light or at night. Shutter delay is minimal. If you use flash at high ISO, it does take a while to write to the card, but otherwise time delay between shots is minimal. The zoom action is not the greatest, but it is much improved, and more responsive. The camera also shoots pretty good quality movies, with decent sound.
The A59IS has a heavy duty, metallic gray, wear resistant housing, that is thick, providing for an excellent grip. The camera accepts HDSC cards, so you can take thousands of images, or shoot some pretty long movies. Battery life is good, using AA sized NiMH batteries. The 2.5" display is substantial, and the flash pretty powerful. Like any camera, the controls take some getting used to, but the design is similar to other Powershots, and not too complicated. Shooting mode is selected using the dial on the top of the camera. Program Mode (P) works fine for me most of the time. The size could be an issue for some, as the camera is a little bulky to slip in a pocket, but overall this is a very solid performing point and shoot.
Is the A590IS worth paying a premium price? Although I am very happy with mine, the camera has been on the market for almost two years! Newer cameras probably offer more features and better performance, for the same money. As good as the A590IS is, I am on the lookout for a smaller camera to replace it someday. Canon's new SD940IS looks like an interesting possibility.
When I received the camera I began running it through it's paces. Very soon into it I began to see issues with the camera. Moving beyond those though, I started taking test pictures using all of the different settings available. I then loaded the images to my PC and began looking at them. What I viewed was very disappointing. First off, the images were not sharp. Secondly, the colors seemed muted and they were not very accurate to what the actual scene looked like. Lastly and on closer examination, I was stunned to see large amounts of purple fringing. This is a problem I would expect on earlier generations of digital cameras, but not now and not on a Canon. What is really sad is that purple fringing is most common in high contrast areas; with my test pictures high contrast scenes were not the case. The purple fringing explained the lack of punch, sharpness, and color accuracy. Thinking I may have received a defective camera I did some Googling. To my surprise I found other people were reporting the same problem with this camera.
I have to tell ya, prior to this Canon purchase I had used a Kodak Z650. The images I get from the Kodak blow away anything I got out of the Canon. Needless to say, the Canon was returned for refund. (I want to thank Amazon for the quick and painless processing of the return.)
Here are some other issues I found with this camera:
1. The selector wheel that is used to navigate within the menus did not translate properly. I found myself spinning it around several times before it would begin moving the cursor. Along with that there was a stickiness to it. It would stick and you'd have to apply more pressure for it to turn, this in turn caused the cursor to jump father than you wanted to go. It was frustrating to use. You can get around all that by pressing the dial down in the corners for the direction you want to go. That seemed to translate well but it is more time consuming. One click equals one position in the menu. If you want to reach the end of the menu you'd have to click your way through one position at a time.
2. I feel the menu layout and functionality was poorly designed and not very intuitive. There are too many layers to navigate through and too many ways to get where you want to go. Here again, my Kodak does a much better job in accessing the options and settings. And just to be clear, the Kodak has many of the same SLR functions to choose from. My point being, it's pretty much an apples and apples comparison. The Kodak is extremely easy to navigate and very easy to learn. Canon could take some lessons from them. I'm not trying to sell Kodak here. The Kodak has it's own issues. The one main thing going for the Kodak is that it is capable of producing some stunning images, and that is the very least I'd expect from a camera.
3. The camera is pretty heavy as others have reported. It's not a problem for me but I think it is worth mentioning again.
4. I found that the lens cap falling off was not a problem for me, but taking it off was. I found this primarily true when you are using the lens shield that Canon supplies. It was difficult for me to fit my fingers between the inner lens shield wall and the lens cap where the releases are located. It was very clumsy and difficult to squeeze the tabs in order to release the cap.
I would have overlooked notes 1 to 4 if the image quality had been there. Sadly for me it wasn't.






