Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
10038 отзывов пользователей o Canon PowerShot SX160 IS
Пользовались
Canon PowerShot SX160 IS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Скроменый эксперт
25.02.2010
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I bought this camera from Amazon in August of 2009. A few weeks later, Canon released the newer version (SX20), so I still had the option of keeping the SX10 or returning it to Amazon for the SX20. After researching the SX20, I decided to keep the SX10, and I'm glad I did. The main reason is that most of the "experts" out there who tested both cameras claim that the SX10 has slightly better image quality, and that was important to me. I know that the SX10 has a "Super Fine" image quality setting, while the newer SX20 can only go as high as a "Fine" setting. The SX10 comes with a full printed manual, while the SX20 does not, and the SX10 has a voice recording option, something they left off the new SX20.
Before I purchased the SX10, I was searching for a digital camera that had a lot of zoom, took decent photos, and shot good quality video with excellent sound. Well, this camera has lots of zoom (20X), good for taking shots of wildlife. The video is very good, and the stereo sound is far, far better than my older point and shoot camera. No need for me to buy a separate camcorder. The photo image quality is OK, but not spectacular. Some photos have "noise", but I keep reminding myself that this is NOT a thousand dollar SLR camera, so I don't expect perfection.
For those people who are not camera geeks, this camera will serve you well in Auto setting, but I advise everyone to read the instruction manual and play around with the many manual settings, as there are lots of fun things you will discover, and you will be able to take better photos as well.
Before I purchased the SX10, I was searching for a digital camera that had a lot of zoom, took decent photos, and shot good quality video with excellent sound. Well, this camera has lots of zoom (20X), good for taking shots of wildlife. The video is very good, and the stereo sound is far, far better than my older point and shoot camera. No need for me to buy a separate camcorder. The photo image quality is OK, but not spectacular. Some photos have "noise", but I keep reminding myself that this is NOT a thousand dollar SLR camera, so I don't expect perfection.
For those people who are not camera geeks, this camera will serve you well in Auto setting, but I advise everyone to read the instruction manual and play around with the many manual settings, as there are lots of fun things you will discover, and you will be able to take better photos as well.
Скроменый эксперт
18.01.2011
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Like many other reviewers I did not get the item pictured. Didn't get what other folks described (with adhesive pads) either. What I got was the lens cap with a string that I could tie myself to the cap and camera. I was never good at knots when I was a Boy Scout! Cheesy but the price of the item was not worth returning.
The cap itself seems like pretty high quality so I took the leash off of one of my old camera's lens caps and used it on this one.
The cap itself seems like pretty high quality so I took the leash off of one of my old camera's lens caps and used it on this one.
Скроменый эксперт
30.12.2010
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I'll be the first to admit that I'm not a seasoned photographer, but that's exactly why I invested in an entry level camera like this one. It seemed to take some great pictures around my neighborhood and on the beach where I first tried it, but when on my trip to the Middle East it disappointed me. Maybe it was because I was mainly taking city shots with lots of people moving around. Either way, I lugged the thing around for days on end for a batch of pictures that my average point and shoot camera could have come up with.
Скроменый эксперт
26.07.2010
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
after a lot of research i bought this instead of a entry level SLR and on the whole am very impressed. within minutes I had taken some amazing photos with ease. the zoom and super macro are both very impressive and the continuous shooting mode is great for capturing action of my 3 year old daughter! there are loads of clever features that I am still exploring such as colour enchance (you can pick out any colour in view and the camera highlights that within the photo). HD video is great and easy to use plus you can use most of the other features whilst recording.
Things that are a littel annoying are:
1. The lens cap is a bit fiddly and can take a while to get on. it also has no holes in it to attatch it to anything.
2. The dedicated HD record button is great but you have to really stretch your thumb to get to it; meaning when you stop recording there is often a jerk of the camera where you have reached across to stop it!
3. The manual controls seem a bit limited (alhtough I am no expert and am still experimenting).
Things that are a littel annoying are:
1. The lens cap is a bit fiddly and can take a while to get on. it also has no holes in it to attatch it to anything.
2. The dedicated HD record button is great but you have to really stretch your thumb to get to it; meaning when you stop recording there is often a jerk of the camera where you have reached across to stop it!
3. The manual controls seem a bit limited (alhtough I am no expert and am still experimenting).
Скроменый эксперт
06.05.2009
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I was a long time user of the Canon EOS SLR's and I loved them. I say that only because readers should know I am an experienced photographer. I make this review after using this camera for about six months. I've had plenty of time to put it through its paces in various situations.
First let me say that I'm not comparing the SX10IS to an SLR but rather to my Panasonic DMC FZ20 with 12X zoom Lieca lens. The Panasonic is an excellent camera, by the way and I recommend it highly.
The Canon SX10IS camera has been a big disappointment. It was purchased mainly for wildlife photography. The 20X zoom works fine, but its bad points far outweigh the one good feature this camera has.
1. First the lens. The images are soft, not as sharp and crisp as the ones from the Panasonic. This could also be the auto focusing mechanism. Near, far, where ever the subjects are, the focus is soft.
2. Camera design is poor. Buttons cover every available surface of the camera's body. My small hands just cannot hold the camera without pushing one of the numerous buttons that cover the camera's surface.
3. I wish they had not attempted to cram every conceivable feature into this camera. More is not always better. The menu is a nightmare to navigate. No changing settings quickly to capture a bird in flight. Thankfully they left out the wash and spin dry feature but that is the only thing missing.
4. The optical viewfinder, which you need to use when shooting wildlife (especially if you are a former SLR user or if you wear glasses), is very poor. The view is fuzzy and the viewfinder is very small.
5. The camera body is cheaply made. Handle it very carefully. For example the door to the memory card is hinged with cheap material that will easily break with much opening or a slip of your fingers.
6. When holding the focus at 20X waiting for a subject to turn just the right way the camera makes a chugging sound and the image jumps. That can't be good.
These are my main complaints about this camera. Some advice: Don't just order this product online. Hold one in your hands, do some trial shots. Try to use it as you would in your everyday photography before you purchase it. Look at other camera models and compare before you buy.
Updated: The camera died just a little over a year after I purchased it. This is the last Canon I will own. I'm sticking to my Panasonics and have ordered the Lumix DMC-FZ40 Digital Camera to replace the disappointing Canon.
First let me say that I'm not comparing the SX10IS to an SLR but rather to my Panasonic DMC FZ20 with 12X zoom Lieca lens. The Panasonic is an excellent camera, by the way and I recommend it highly.
The Canon SX10IS camera has been a big disappointment. It was purchased mainly for wildlife photography. The 20X zoom works fine, but its bad points far outweigh the one good feature this camera has.
1. First the lens. The images are soft, not as sharp and crisp as the ones from the Panasonic. This could also be the auto focusing mechanism. Near, far, where ever the subjects are, the focus is soft.
2. Camera design is poor. Buttons cover every available surface of the camera's body. My small hands just cannot hold the camera without pushing one of the numerous buttons that cover the camera's surface.
3. I wish they had not attempted to cram every conceivable feature into this camera. More is not always better. The menu is a nightmare to navigate. No changing settings quickly to capture a bird in flight. Thankfully they left out the wash and spin dry feature but that is the only thing missing.
4. The optical viewfinder, which you need to use when shooting wildlife (especially if you are a former SLR user or if you wear glasses), is very poor. The view is fuzzy and the viewfinder is very small.
5. The camera body is cheaply made. Handle it very carefully. For example the door to the memory card is hinged with cheap material that will easily break with much opening or a slip of your fingers.
6. When holding the focus at 20X waiting for a subject to turn just the right way the camera makes a chugging sound and the image jumps. That can't be good.
These are my main complaints about this camera. Some advice: Don't just order this product online. Hold one in your hands, do some trial shots. Try to use it as you would in your everyday photography before you purchase it. Look at other camera models and compare before you buy.
Updated: The camera died just a little over a year after I purchased it. This is the last Canon I will own. I'm sticking to my Panasonics and have ordered the Lumix DMC-FZ40 Digital Camera to replace the disappointing Canon.
Скроменый эксперт
12.03.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
great product especially for the money, i have bought 2 one for my ixus 130 and one for my daughters ixus 85 one small comment could be the the carabina type clip on the sock could cause some damage if you are careless when putting the camera back in the sock
Скроменый эксперт
25.05.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This is a sweet little camera. So many excellent features for a small, priced right camera. I bought it for a vacation trip since I didn't want to lug my heavier, complicated Nikon D80. I wanted a simple no brain point and shoot. The SX10IS is everything and more. I took well over 2500 images with good results and really no problems. From the plane looking down into the Rocky Mtns, to a moving Amtrak train, to a sailing ship, 99% of images were usable with the exception of a few operator errors...read.... I need a head for that body.... I was able to take photo still shots while filming and so much more, I was able to slowly zoom in while filming. Did I mention the Macro and super Macro yet?? The camera is very easy to operate, I didn't really need to read the manual, just kept figuring it out through the controls no complications there. Are the photos as clear as the Nikons? Possibly not, but the price difference is large and the fact that one lense will do just about everything far outweigh those factors. The biggest problem is learning the software program for the computer, which I think I may have to uninstall and reload, other than that I absolutely love this camera and I think it will remain a Canon classic for years to come.
Скроменый эксперт
23.10.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I lost the original cap that came with the camera the first week I owned it. The original cap is worthless and did not have a strap. I could not find a replacement cap in any of the big box stores, so I came to Amazon and took a chance.
The replacement cap I got works great and it has a strap that holds the cap to the camera. The cap is held to the string by a little sticky pad, which I wasn't sure if it would hold, but it has done the job so far and I have been very active with our new camera and taken it on over 50 miles worth of hiking trips in the past couple of months without losing it.
The shipping was quick and no issues. I will order another one if I ever lose this one. The price was right.
The replacement cap I got works great and it has a strap that holds the cap to the camera. The cap is held to the string by a little sticky pad, which I wasn't sure if it would hold, but it has done the job so far and I have been very active with our new camera and taken it on over 50 miles worth of hiking trips in the past couple of months without losing it.
The shipping was quick and no issues. I will order another one if I ever lose this one. The price was right.
Скроменый эксперт
12.01.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
This camera is a gift for my wife who does not want a complicated camera. However, it has the three features she needs: Image stabilization, lots of pixels (8Mpix) and lots of zoom (10:1 optical). It also has many features only found in higher level devices, most of which my wife will never use. The "auto" setting covers her needs. This unit (used) came without memory card or batteries, but that was easy to fill in. All is working well.
Скроменый эксперт
16.03.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
When used outside in good light (or extremely bright indoor light, such as next to a window) it is an outstanding camera. It can take high-quality shots of stills, portraits, and action shots. The zoom is very effective at distance, and the settings can go from fully automatic to completely manual. In the right light this camera can get professional-quality shots.
However, indoors this camera is no better than a typical point and shoot camera that would fit in your pocket. The flash is weak (even at the highest setting), and pictures without flash are almost impossible. ISO greater than 200 is pointless as photos will be overcome by noise. If all you plan to do is have people hold still while you take a picture from less than seven feet, then you'll be fine. If you are trying to get action shots indoors, forget about it.
This camera will gobble batteries faster than a pig runs to slops. You'll be lucky to get fifty pictures out of a new set of alkaline batteries. However, if you get a good set of rechargable batteries, you'll be overwhelmingly and pleasantly surprised by how many pictures you can get: hundreds. Go figure. I have four rechargable batteries. I use two at a time, and can easily take 500 pictures before having to recharge.
The flash is very slow to recycle, so again, indoor shots with this camera are slow and annoying.
The camera is very reasonably priced. I paid two Benjamins for it new and have taken a couple thousand photos already. The colors are brilliant and popping, but realistic. Like I said, with good light, you can't go wrong with this camera. I mostly use the TV setting. I set my shutter speed at about 250-360 and then I don't miss a single action shot. It's fast, reliable, and fun. This camera can get you results that look professional.
The camera is bulky. If you carry a large purse, you'll be fine with it, or if you use a backpack/briefcase. But if you're expecting to slip this into your shirt pocket or jeans pocket, forgetabboutit. It won't fit. It will only fit in a very loose pants pocket, and even then it's annoying. You could put it in a case and attach it to your belt, which works great, but ruins the style factor. This camera looks like an old 1980s film camera (although it performs like a dynamite digital). You won't win any style points with this camera.
If you are going to have to lug something around and want the best quality you can afford, look at the Rebel XS, the best priced digital DSLR on the market. But if you only have two hundred bucks, and can't go another three hundred, then get this SX110is. It's a great camera and I don't regret the purchase for a minute.
However, indoors this camera is no better than a typical point and shoot camera that would fit in your pocket. The flash is weak (even at the highest setting), and pictures without flash are almost impossible. ISO greater than 200 is pointless as photos will be overcome by noise. If all you plan to do is have people hold still while you take a picture from less than seven feet, then you'll be fine. If you are trying to get action shots indoors, forget about it.
This camera will gobble batteries faster than a pig runs to slops. You'll be lucky to get fifty pictures out of a new set of alkaline batteries. However, if you get a good set of rechargable batteries, you'll be overwhelmingly and pleasantly surprised by how many pictures you can get: hundreds. Go figure. I have four rechargable batteries. I use two at a time, and can easily take 500 pictures before having to recharge.
The flash is very slow to recycle, so again, indoor shots with this camera are slow and annoying.
The camera is very reasonably priced. I paid two Benjamins for it new and have taken a couple thousand photos already. The colors are brilliant and popping, but realistic. Like I said, with good light, you can't go wrong with this camera. I mostly use the TV setting. I set my shutter speed at about 250-360 and then I don't miss a single action shot. It's fast, reliable, and fun. This camera can get you results that look professional.
The camera is bulky. If you carry a large purse, you'll be fine with it, or if you use a backpack/briefcase. But if you're expecting to slip this into your shirt pocket or jeans pocket, forgetabboutit. It won't fit. It will only fit in a very loose pants pocket, and even then it's annoying. You could put it in a case and attach it to your belt, which works great, but ruins the style factor. This camera looks like an old 1980s film camera (although it performs like a dynamite digital). You won't win any style points with this camera.
If you are going to have to lug something around and want the best quality you can afford, look at the Rebel XS, the best priced digital DSLR on the market. But if you only have two hundred bucks, and can't go another three hundred, then get this SX110is. It's a great camera and I don't regret the purchase for a minute.
Скроменый эксперт
05.01.2009
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Updated - March 9th 2009
This camera is good overall, giving more features than the average point-and-shoot camera.
Pros:
+10x Optical Zoom
+Great Macro quality
+Good Flash
+Large LCD Screen
+Lots of manual control usually not found on many P&S cameras. This camera allows for Aperture Priority, Shutter Speed Priority, Custom ISO settings, Manual Focus, or complete manual control over all of these features.
+Good build quality
+Image Stabilizer (definitely helps when using the optical zoom)
+Standard Mini-USB port
+Backup battery for clock and settings (so you don't have to reset the clock when replacing the batteries or the SD Card which is located next to the batteries)
+ SD/SDHC card slot
+Face recognition (which is easy to quickly turn on or off with the press of one button)
+Runs off two AAs. Both a good and a bad thing, although mostly good since you can change batteries when in the field or find extras at a local shop.
+Direct-Print to printer with a USB cable (I've never used this, but could be useful and convenient for some)
Cons:
-Okay battery life. Battery can be used quickly when using the flash a lot or using optical zoom often. Setting the LCD brightness down can help. I bought High-Capacity rechargeable AA batteries and these helped a lot. I wouldn't recommend cheap AAs though. It's worth investing money in good rechargeable batteries.
-No optical viewfinder
-Optical zoom can't be used with recording video (once started.) You can zoom in then start recording, but not while its going.
-Grainy at high ISO speeds (although this is typical of P&S cameras.) Anything up to 400 looks nice, but it's noticeable at 800 and 1600 and 3200 aren't usable at if you care about quality.
-Not very compact and a little heavy. While this is fine for me (I like the form factor) this camera may not be for someone who wants a thin light-weight camera.
While I'm just an amateur photographer, this camera is definitely is worth its money for its impressive picture quality, optical zoom, and features. While the graininess at higher ISO settings is sometimes noticeable, this is common for point-and-shoot cameras. Some may ask why bother with this camera if you can get a 10+ or so Megapixel camera for about the same price or cheaper, it's simple... the SX110 IS takes great pictures, has 10x optical (which is very important in comparison to digital) zoom, and provides many features not found in most point-and-shoot cameras. Megapixels are not benchmark of the quality of the pictures, but rather the size (resolution.) If you want an advanced nice P&S with extra features, but don't want to buy an SLR, then this might be the camera for you. If you plan on getting serious and want to take action shots that require higher ISO settings, consider an entry level SLR such as the Nikon D40. The D40 is around $450.
This camera is good overall, giving more features than the average point-and-shoot camera.
Pros:
+10x Optical Zoom
+Great Macro quality
+Good Flash
+Large LCD Screen
+Lots of manual control usually not found on many P&S cameras. This camera allows for Aperture Priority, Shutter Speed Priority, Custom ISO settings, Manual Focus, or complete manual control over all of these features.
+Good build quality
+Image Stabilizer (definitely helps when using the optical zoom)
+Standard Mini-USB port
+Backup battery for clock and settings (so you don't have to reset the clock when replacing the batteries or the SD Card which is located next to the batteries)
+ SD/SDHC card slot
+Face recognition (which is easy to quickly turn on or off with the press of one button)
+Runs off two AAs. Both a good and a bad thing, although mostly good since you can change batteries when in the field or find extras at a local shop.
+Direct-Print to printer with a USB cable (I've never used this, but could be useful and convenient for some)
Cons:
-Okay battery life. Battery can be used quickly when using the flash a lot or using optical zoom often. Setting the LCD brightness down can help. I bought High-Capacity rechargeable AA batteries and these helped a lot. I wouldn't recommend cheap AAs though. It's worth investing money in good rechargeable batteries.
-No optical viewfinder
-Optical zoom can't be used with recording video (once started.) You can zoom in then start recording, but not while its going.
-Grainy at high ISO speeds (although this is typical of P&S cameras.) Anything up to 400 looks nice, but it's noticeable at 800 and 1600 and 3200 aren't usable at if you care about quality.
-Not very compact and a little heavy. While this is fine for me (I like the form factor) this camera may not be for someone who wants a thin light-weight camera.
While I'm just an amateur photographer, this camera is definitely is worth its money for its impressive picture quality, optical zoom, and features. While the graininess at higher ISO settings is sometimes noticeable, this is common for point-and-shoot cameras. Some may ask why bother with this camera if you can get a 10+ or so Megapixel camera for about the same price or cheaper, it's simple... the SX110 IS takes great pictures, has 10x optical (which is very important in comparison to digital) zoom, and provides many features not found in most point-and-shoot cameras. Megapixels are not benchmark of the quality of the pictures, but rather the size (resolution.) If you want an advanced nice P&S with extra features, but don't want to buy an SLR, then this might be the camera for you. If you plan on getting serious and want to take action shots that require higher ISO settings, consider an entry level SLR such as the Nikon D40. The D40 is around $450.
Скроменый эксперт
03.04.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have been using this camera for over two years. Excellent camera for the price. It takes great pictures.This camera was recommended to me by a photographer.
Скроменый эксперт
19.02.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I ordered this used camera, and while I did not like
the way it looked when it arrived, I contacted the seller
who responded to me promptly, advised a full refund would
be provided, all in all a great shopping experience and
I would definitely purchase from this seller again!!!
the way it looked when it arrived, I contacted the seller
who responded to me promptly, advised a full refund would
be provided, all in all a great shopping experience and
I would definitely purchase from this seller again!!!
Скроменый эксперт
16.02.2009
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I got this camera to replace my Canon Powershot A520 4.0MP p&s camera since I'm due with our 2nd baby in less than 2 weeks. It was so cheap I couldn't resist (only $109). I like being able to take short video clips and wanted the higher MPs for photos and needed something small for days when I don't want to lug my DSLR + lens around along with my diaper bag. I think it'll do the job well. Some things I dislike though: 1) The camera is slow on rechargeable batteries unless the batteries are fully charged. Noticeably slower than with the A520. 2) Also powering on/off is noisy due to mechanical noise associated the lens opening/retracting (this is audible and unpreventable even with all volume/sounds turned off except for playback & the self timer). Much more audible than our Powershot A520 and I would be nervous using it in a quiet setting like a wedding or funeral.
My major gripe is with the new Zoombrowser 6.1 software that came with the A590IS. The A590IS won't work with the older Zoombrowser SW I have (version 5.0), images show up as question marks and do not download at all. I did not have any problems removing my old SW as a previous reviewer mentioned--my Dell laptop running Windows XP actually automatically removed the old version and installed the new version when I loaded the CD-ROM that came with the new camera.
The most annoying feature of Zoombrowser 6.1 is that it automatically connects you to the "CameraWindowDC" interface that has no instructions and just a bunch of buttons to click on if you plug the camera in using the USB cable to download images. I can't find a way to bypass this interface and still connect to the camera. This method of connecting takes away the option to set the individual image file names and download folder name automatically as was possible with the Zoombrowser 5.0 version--I like to use the shooting date + a 4 position sequence number and I like give folder names that reflect the event/occasion, not simply the shooting date.
So now there are many extra steps to rename the files and move them into an appropriate folder. However, the features to set the file names and download folder are available if you use ZoomBrowser 6.0 to connect to a memory card (like when I download images from my DSLR using a USB-based multi-memory card reader). In Zoombrowser 5.0, you had the option whether you were connecting directly to the camera or a card reader or directly to a memory card.
So now the best way for me to download the images from the A590IS while maximizing the utility of Zoombrowser 6.0 is for me to take the SD card out of the camera and put it into the built-in SD card reader in my laptop. Then I have the option to select a specific download folder & set the way I want the images named as they download.
My major gripe is with the new Zoombrowser 6.1 software that came with the A590IS. The A590IS won't work with the older Zoombrowser SW I have (version 5.0), images show up as question marks and do not download at all. I did not have any problems removing my old SW as a previous reviewer mentioned--my Dell laptop running Windows XP actually automatically removed the old version and installed the new version when I loaded the CD-ROM that came with the new camera.
The most annoying feature of Zoombrowser 6.1 is that it automatically connects you to the "CameraWindowDC" interface that has no instructions and just a bunch of buttons to click on if you plug the camera in using the USB cable to download images. I can't find a way to bypass this interface and still connect to the camera. This method of connecting takes away the option to set the individual image file names and download folder name automatically as was possible with the Zoombrowser 5.0 version--I like to use the shooting date + a 4 position sequence number and I like give folder names that reflect the event/occasion, not simply the shooting date.
So now there are many extra steps to rename the files and move them into an appropriate folder. However, the features to set the file names and download folder are available if you use ZoomBrowser 6.0 to connect to a memory card (like when I download images from my DSLR using a USB-based multi-memory card reader). In Zoombrowser 5.0, you had the option whether you were connecting directly to the camera or a card reader or directly to a memory card.
So now the best way for me to download the images from the A590IS while maximizing the utility of Zoombrowser 6.0 is for me to take the SD card out of the camera and put it into the built-in SD card reader in my laptop. Then I have the option to select a specific download folder & set the way I want the images named as they download.
Скроменый эксперт
08.07.2009
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I've been using this camera for about 6 months now. I wanted to replace my old Minolta F200 for better quality images. Honestly, it was not better if not worse. I was actually surprised that my old F200 was as good as this camera concerning image quality.
First, there was so much noise in the image. As a natural result, many of my pictures were not clear and I had to painfully discard them. I don't like grain in the picture and it was the main reason for replacing the old F200, but obviously SX10IS didn't satisfy me. Second, on ISO 80 in aperture priority mode (no zoom), I changed aperture from f/2.8 to f/8 and got blurrier image (surely I used tripod), which is counter-intuitive to me, because with f/8 and with its tiny sensor, theoretically, I had to get virtually infinite depth and sharper image. What's wrong?? Am I missing something?? This problem made me feel that this camera might have some fundamental flaws in its optic design. Third, focus is very bad. It is very difficult to auto-focus on anything including side view of face in medium or low light. Focus during movie taking is more terrible. It goes back and forth between in-focus and out-focus. Very bad.
Of course there are many good points (that's why I decided not to return it). I really like the full manual mode because finally I can apply many basic photography concepts. I also like the external flash mount, which most point-and-shoot cameras don't have. It is a big positive point for those who want to learn lighting. Finally, 20x zoom is a very good addition, because I don't have to purchase expensive and heavy lenses (the biggest reason I stay away from DSLR cameras) and I actually got some good out-of-focus images.
Overall, if you want much better image quality in a similar body size (at around $700, without 20x zoom, and potentially additional lens purchases), check out Panasonic G1 (micro 4/3). But if you don't really mind the picture quality so much (in fact, with a tiny little sensor, it is physically very difficult to get sharp images), this is a very good camera. Almost everything you can find in DSLR is in this camera without heavy weight and lenses. So, for those who are not very serious in photography but want many functions in an inexpensive body (like me), I recommend this camera.
First, there was so much noise in the image. As a natural result, many of my pictures were not clear and I had to painfully discard them. I don't like grain in the picture and it was the main reason for replacing the old F200, but obviously SX10IS didn't satisfy me. Second, on ISO 80 in aperture priority mode (no zoom), I changed aperture from f/2.8 to f/8 and got blurrier image (surely I used tripod), which is counter-intuitive to me, because with f/8 and with its tiny sensor, theoretically, I had to get virtually infinite depth and sharper image. What's wrong?? Am I missing something?? This problem made me feel that this camera might have some fundamental flaws in its optic design. Third, focus is very bad. It is very difficult to auto-focus on anything including side view of face in medium or low light. Focus during movie taking is more terrible. It goes back and forth between in-focus and out-focus. Very bad.
Of course there are many good points (that's why I decided not to return it). I really like the full manual mode because finally I can apply many basic photography concepts. I also like the external flash mount, which most point-and-shoot cameras don't have. It is a big positive point for those who want to learn lighting. Finally, 20x zoom is a very good addition, because I don't have to purchase expensive and heavy lenses (the biggest reason I stay away from DSLR cameras) and I actually got some good out-of-focus images.
Overall, if you want much better image quality in a similar body size (at around $700, without 20x zoom, and potentially additional lens purchases), check out Panasonic G1 (micro 4/3). But if you don't really mind the picture quality so much (in fact, with a tiny little sensor, it is physically very difficult to get sharp images), this is a very good camera. Almost everything you can find in DSLR is in this camera without heavy weight and lenses. So, for those who are not very serious in photography but want many functions in an inexpensive body (like me), I recommend this camera.
Скроменый эксперт
11.01.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
There is no better digital camera in the $250 range than this Canon. OK, maybe there is, but this is a great camera. I find it very intuitive and with enough manual control to make me feel more like a photographer. It takes great pictures on automatic, too. The quality of the prints is adjustable and on the right setting the pictures hold their resolution well when enlarged. The 40x digital zoom is also very handy.
Скроменый эксперт
27.06.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
20 odd years ago I used to love going all over the place snapping away with my old Olympus OM2N, but after amassing a few carrier bags full of unprocessed film just gave it up. Then about 3 years back I got an Olympus pocket compact and started getting back into snapping away but always promised myself a DSLR when I could afford.
Well, now's that time!! I thought of something like a Canon EOS450 initially but I dont really want to be lugging all the lenses etc around now, and then came across the Canon SX1 IS. I read the specs..too good to be true I thought, read the reviews, read them all again, had a few cans of beer and got the plastic out and ordered from Amazon. 2 weeks on and after a good play around with it I can't believe what a bargain this camera is!! (now £40 cheaper too..HUH!!). Initially the user guide seems a bit head busting, but taking things one step at a time all the features become apparent and really easy to use. I'd recommend this camera to anyone either looking to upgrade from a pocket compact to the serious amateur or pro photographer needing to travel light.
PROS...Too many to list, it really does what it says on the box. A bargain at the price so spend the extra money you'll save on buying a DSLR plus lenses on rechargeable batteries and chargers instead... Widescreen HD video through the telly looks great... 4 frames/second shooting makes sure you get "that" action shot....No messing about changing lenses, just zoom in.... No carrying bags of extra lenses about....I could go on forever.
CONS...The front of the lens is not threaded so not able to fit filters without an adaptor. None is available in the UK but an adaptor is available from a company called Lensmate in USA (Google it!!) $22 inc postage to UK, this will enable fitting 58mm thread filters.... 4:3 ratio video plays OK on my lowish spec laptop with VLC media player (Google it!!) BUT Widescreen HD video will need serious computing power to play the .mov file format on a PC, although there's no problems with the camera playing this through the telly.
RECOMMENDED EXTRA ACCESSORIES....8GB SDHC Card stores approx 2000 photos at highest quality setting....Lensmate SX1 58mm filer adaptor....UV filter....Circular polarizer filter....Lots of Energizer 2000 mah rechargeable batteries....Widescreen HD telly.
Well, now's that time!! I thought of something like a Canon EOS450 initially but I dont really want to be lugging all the lenses etc around now, and then came across the Canon SX1 IS. I read the specs..too good to be true I thought, read the reviews, read them all again, had a few cans of beer and got the plastic out and ordered from Amazon. 2 weeks on and after a good play around with it I can't believe what a bargain this camera is!! (now £40 cheaper too..HUH!!). Initially the user guide seems a bit head busting, but taking things one step at a time all the features become apparent and really easy to use. I'd recommend this camera to anyone either looking to upgrade from a pocket compact to the serious amateur or pro photographer needing to travel light.
PROS...Too many to list, it really does what it says on the box. A bargain at the price so spend the extra money you'll save on buying a DSLR plus lenses on rechargeable batteries and chargers instead... Widescreen HD video through the telly looks great... 4 frames/second shooting makes sure you get "that" action shot....No messing about changing lenses, just zoom in.... No carrying bags of extra lenses about....I could go on forever.
CONS...The front of the lens is not threaded so not able to fit filters without an adaptor. None is available in the UK but an adaptor is available from a company called Lensmate in USA (Google it!!) $22 inc postage to UK, this will enable fitting 58mm thread filters.... 4:3 ratio video plays OK on my lowish spec laptop with VLC media player (Google it!!) BUT Widescreen HD video will need serious computing power to play the .mov file format on a PC, although there's no problems with the camera playing this through the telly.
RECOMMENDED EXTRA ACCESSORIES....8GB SDHC Card stores approx 2000 photos at highest quality setting....Lensmate SX1 58mm filer adaptor....UV filter....Circular polarizer filter....Lots of Energizer 2000 mah rechargeable batteries....Widescreen HD telly.
Скроменый эксперт
23.01.2011
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I bought this item almost 2 years ago from amazon. It worked pretty well and gave excellent pictures. I had no problem with it until the screen went completely black. Now I can't take any pictures or do anything useful with it. I really liked this camera . The camera worked well when it did. I hope I can still repair it and would give canon a next chance in the future.
Скроменый эксперт
21.12.2008
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I searched for along time for this kind of camera. (in the $200 range) I was drawn by the 10x zoom and Optical Image Stabilization(IS). (both work great and are very nice to have!) After using it for a few weeks, I have had mixed results. Before you read on, understand that I also shoot with a canon xti, often with a $300 50mm lens on it, so I think my standards might be a little higher than the average user. With that said, here is what I think:
When you shoot in auto mode, the ISO it chooses (ISO 200) will not be as clear as the camera is capable of. Thus I find you have to use a Program (P) mode and set it to ISO 80 to get better reduced-noise pictures. Otherwise pictures can be grainy. The pictures are poor at ISO higher than 200.
Focusing is a bit slow in low light, and unless you can balance the camera on something steady, and your subject is not moving, you will need to use the flash. As I have read it on reviews on its predecessor Canon sx100, the recycle time on the flash is somewhat annoying. You will have to wait a good 5-6 seconds before you can ready up for another shot. This is a drag when you have people who are posing, or for a subject that is passing you by, like at an evening parade. The flash is set "on" or "off" by manually raising the flash with your finger. No automatic pop-up. Not a problem for me as I don't like using flashes anyways, especially on this camera!!!
I think the video quality out of this camera is great, far better than what I got out of older Sony Cybershot models DSCW-50 and the DSCW-55. Note that you cannot optically zoom while shooting video; it will let you zoom digitally.
The upsides for this camera are many. The 3-inch screen is amazing. It does stick out from the back of the camera, rather than being inset, so it may be prone to scratching. The programmable features are excellent. You can adjust the exposure time to 15 seconds. Playback/review is easy and fast, due to a wheel that lets you scroll through pictures quickly. Viewing it on the big screen with auto-rotation (landscape-portrait) makes it easy to check for focusing and such. Macro shooting is amazing. You can practically touch the subject with the lens and get a clear, very detailed shot!
If you want a quick convenient camera for casual shooting, don't really care about too much zoom, don't get this camera. Get something smaller and faster, and something that comes with a rechargeable lithium battery. I would stick to Nikons, Sonys and Canons. This one takes two AA's, and dealing with those has its pros and cons. I bought this camera for the big 10x zoom for the relatively small size, and the programmable options. I studied studio tests from dpreview.com (great site!) and found this was the best for my needs. The Lumix TZ5 pics looked fuzzy and the design of the Sony H3 is ugly. For other models and side-by-side comparisons, check that site out. Hope this helped you, and good luck on your decision!
When you shoot in auto mode, the ISO it chooses (ISO 200) will not be as clear as the camera is capable of. Thus I find you have to use a Program (P) mode and set it to ISO 80 to get better reduced-noise pictures. Otherwise pictures can be grainy. The pictures are poor at ISO higher than 200.
Focusing is a bit slow in low light, and unless you can balance the camera on something steady, and your subject is not moving, you will need to use the flash. As I have read it on reviews on its predecessor Canon sx100, the recycle time on the flash is somewhat annoying. You will have to wait a good 5-6 seconds before you can ready up for another shot. This is a drag when you have people who are posing, or for a subject that is passing you by, like at an evening parade. The flash is set "on" or "off" by manually raising the flash with your finger. No automatic pop-up. Not a problem for me as I don't like using flashes anyways, especially on this camera!!!
I think the video quality out of this camera is great, far better than what I got out of older Sony Cybershot models DSCW-50 and the DSCW-55. Note that you cannot optically zoom while shooting video; it will let you zoom digitally.
The upsides for this camera are many. The 3-inch screen is amazing. It does stick out from the back of the camera, rather than being inset, so it may be prone to scratching. The programmable features are excellent. You can adjust the exposure time to 15 seconds. Playback/review is easy and fast, due to a wheel that lets you scroll through pictures quickly. Viewing it on the big screen with auto-rotation (landscape-portrait) makes it easy to check for focusing and such. Macro shooting is amazing. You can practically touch the subject with the lens and get a clear, very detailed shot!
If you want a quick convenient camera for casual shooting, don't really care about too much zoom, don't get this camera. Get something smaller and faster, and something that comes with a rechargeable lithium battery. I would stick to Nikons, Sonys and Canons. This one takes two AA's, and dealing with those has its pros and cons. I bought this camera for the big 10x zoom for the relatively small size, and the programmable options. I studied studio tests from dpreview.com (great site!) and found this was the best for my needs. The Lumix TZ5 pics looked fuzzy and the design of the Sony H3 is ugly. For other models and side-by-side comparisons, check that site out. Hope this helped you, and good luck on your decision!
Скроменый эксперт
27.02.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This must be one of the only digital compact cameras with an optical view finder. it is brilliant when the sun is behind and blocks out the display. Good menu system but is mostly used in the basic mode and still produces superb results.
Скроменый эксперт
23.01.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I bought this cameras sock as it has a long hold-chain which means it can be wore on the neck, and this would be convenient when traveling. I'm satisfied with the product considering this purpose. But I would not stronly recommend it if you prefer keeping the sock (with camera in) in your bag, because it's a bit easy for the camera to slip out of it.
Скроменый эксперт
17.12.2009
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I've had this camera for a year now.
Things I like: easy to move dial for settings (including video), several scenes set right on dial, auto setting works well most of the time, flash can be turned off by not putting it up (lift flash manually or leave down for no flash), zoom is clear for full range of optical zoom, takes good video, big LCD on back, timer easy to get to, face recognition works well, several manual options are easy to get to (if I can remember how to find them).
Things I don't like: slow flash charges between photos, battery seems to run out fast (my last camera had a lithium-ion and I miss it), for other people taking a picture for me, the flash is often forgotten (b/c it has to be flipped up to use), sometimes when I push down the shutter button (half way to focus, then all the way to snap a picture), it doesn't take - as if I didn't focus (it's picky about wanting you to focus before pressing the shutter all the way), manual is only partially helpful - it doesn't always explain in full sentences how to do something - a lot of tables/charts. Although I'd like to use more manual settings, and have played around with them, I usually keep it on auto (sometimes ignoring the warning that I need a flash), and pretty much always get good pictures (even when it warns me of a possible shaky picture - it's usually not.
Overall, it's been a nice camera to upgrade to (my last was a kodak easyshare DX7440 - loved the lithium ion battery and no waiting for a flash to charge) . Those are my only real complaints about this one. The time between charged flashes is shorter with a well charged battery, and the pictures are good, even in low light or less than ideal conditions.
Things I like: easy to move dial for settings (including video), several scenes set right on dial, auto setting works well most of the time, flash can be turned off by not putting it up (lift flash manually or leave down for no flash), zoom is clear for full range of optical zoom, takes good video, big LCD on back, timer easy to get to, face recognition works well, several manual options are easy to get to (if I can remember how to find them).
Things I don't like: slow flash charges between photos, battery seems to run out fast (my last camera had a lithium-ion and I miss it), for other people taking a picture for me, the flash is often forgotten (b/c it has to be flipped up to use), sometimes when I push down the shutter button (half way to focus, then all the way to snap a picture), it doesn't take - as if I didn't focus (it's picky about wanting you to focus before pressing the shutter all the way), manual is only partially helpful - it doesn't always explain in full sentences how to do something - a lot of tables/charts. Although I'd like to use more manual settings, and have played around with them, I usually keep it on auto (sometimes ignoring the warning that I need a flash), and pretty much always get good pictures (even when it warns me of a possible shaky picture - it's usually not.
Overall, it's been a nice camera to upgrade to (my last was a kodak easyshare DX7440 - loved the lithium ion battery and no waiting for a flash to charge) . Those are my only real complaints about this one. The time between charged flashes is shorter with a well charged battery, and the pictures are good, even in low light or less than ideal conditions.
Скроменый эксперт
08.01.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Judging by the reviews there may be a variety of these caps from the various vendors. Mine came from Bargain Cell and was exactly what I needed. The lens cap works better than the one that came with the camera - which I lost the first week. It goes on easier and stays much tighter. There's a little hole through which the string tether attaches; there was no stick-on doodad. I'm a happy camper.
Скроменый эксперт
01.12.2008
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Another one returned! Sorry Canon, I really like your products, but KEEP UP WITH THE TIMES for goodness sake!!!! (Excuse the rant) I've tried just about EVERY point and shoot that takes some kind of video, plus countless other digital cameras over the years. The HD P&S's I've tried are: Canon TX1, Panasonic TX5, several flash drive camcorders that also take still pic's, Sanyo HD1000 & HD700, Samsung HV24HD, and ALL the Kodak's that take HD Video. Plus there has been other camera's - too many to mention (i.e. Canon 550, 770, etc.)
Anyway, I just bought (and returned) the SX10. I really wanted to love this camera, but will stick with my Sony T500 for now (check my review of the T500 - that little baby is a keeper).
To keep it short, the still pictures are what you would expect from a Canon, but actually, I think my old Canon G7 takes better pictures. But here are the grips (I prefer the cons in a review more than the pros) in no particular order.
1) The Camera is BIG. Easy to hold but BIG. Love the flip screen - but the camera is BIG. Great lens - but BIG. I guess what I'm trying to say, the damn thing is BIG, almost as big as a DSLR. This is something that you can not just slip in your pocket and run! I guess I would put up with the BIGness of the camera if the video was better (see below).
2) Battery: some might like it, but I did not. Four "AA" batteries! I had to buy a rather expensive charger and rechargeable batteries. Come on, what's going on here! Now adays with all this new technology, Canon couldn't come up with a small battery that holds a decent charge! I know the Sony T500 has poor battery life, but at least the camera is small - you would expect that! Who wants to schlep around 4 extra "AA" batteries - not me! This one was my fault, I did not ever read about the batteries before I bought the camera, but like above, if the Video was better, I could look the other way.
3) Video: This was pretty important to me (again check out the T500). What is up with only the small video format when EVERY other camera company is opting for new 16:9 widescreen format? Again, my old G7 takes just as good "small" video and I can play/edit it with anything! Actually, the video from the SX10 is not all that good, except the fact that you can zoom all the way in (actually that is pretty cool), but not worth keeping it. I was hoping that even though the SX10 was not widescreen 720/1080, it would take decent "HD like" video with the new .MOV video format. Why Canon did not bring the SX1 out first I'll never know; because then if the videos were good - I might have kept the Canon. As many other reviewers have mentioned, I just don't understand these companies or their marketing plan. If they need any help, all they have to do is ask a few geeks like me - I'll tell em' an ear full!
So all in all, I'm keeping the Sony T500 - even if the pictures are not quite as sharp. That little camera is all I need - "right now"! Just my opinion Canon lovers.
Anyway, I just bought (and returned) the SX10. I really wanted to love this camera, but will stick with my Sony T500 for now (check my review of the T500 - that little baby is a keeper).
To keep it short, the still pictures are what you would expect from a Canon, but actually, I think my old Canon G7 takes better pictures. But here are the grips (I prefer the cons in a review more than the pros) in no particular order.
1) The Camera is BIG. Easy to hold but BIG. Love the flip screen - but the camera is BIG. Great lens - but BIG. I guess what I'm trying to say, the damn thing is BIG, almost as big as a DSLR. This is something that you can not just slip in your pocket and run! I guess I would put up with the BIGness of the camera if the video was better (see below).
2) Battery: some might like it, but I did not. Four "AA" batteries! I had to buy a rather expensive charger and rechargeable batteries. Come on, what's going on here! Now adays with all this new technology, Canon couldn't come up with a small battery that holds a decent charge! I know the Sony T500 has poor battery life, but at least the camera is small - you would expect that! Who wants to schlep around 4 extra "AA" batteries - not me! This one was my fault, I did not ever read about the batteries before I bought the camera, but like above, if the Video was better, I could look the other way.
3) Video: This was pretty important to me (again check out the T500). What is up with only the small video format when EVERY other camera company is opting for new 16:9 widescreen format? Again, my old G7 takes just as good "small" video and I can play/edit it with anything! Actually, the video from the SX10 is not all that good, except the fact that you can zoom all the way in (actually that is pretty cool), but not worth keeping it. I was hoping that even though the SX10 was not widescreen 720/1080, it would take decent "HD like" video with the new .MOV video format. Why Canon did not bring the SX1 out first I'll never know; because then if the videos were good - I might have kept the Canon. As many other reviewers have mentioned, I just don't understand these companies or their marketing plan. If they need any help, all they have to do is ask a few geeks like me - I'll tell em' an ear full!
So all in all, I'm keeping the Sony T500 - even if the pictures are not quite as sharp. That little camera is all I need - "right now"! Just my opinion Canon lovers.
Показаны отзывы 4417-4440 из 10038.
