Фотоаппарат Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 — 235 отзывов, плюсы и минусы
⚡ Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 — мощнейший 50x зум и отличное видео в пластиковом корпусе с компромиссным качеством фото.
✅ Стоит покупать, если вам важен рекордный оптический зум для наблюдения, съёмки дикой природы и отличная стабилизация видео без штатива.
❌ Лучше избегать, если для вас принципиально чистое, детализированное фото на любых ISO и съёмка в RAW с последующей обработкой.
Обзор реального опыта использования Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 - анализ 235 отзывов
🔭 Для кого этот зверь: 50-кратный зум как главный козырь
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 — это классический представитель класса ультразумов-«мостиков», который в 2013 году ворвался на рынок с рекордным на тот момент 50-кратным оптическим зумом (24–1200 мм в 35-мм эквиваленте). По сути, вы получаете телескоп в корпусе чуть меньше зеркалки, способный разглядеть кратеры на Луне или логотип на солнечных очках человека, стоящего в сотне метров. Именно этим он цепляет: возможность снимать то, что другим камерам просто недоступно без сменной оптики за несколько тысяч долларов. В отзывах владельцы в один голос твердят: «читал надпись на кепке у человека, которого еле видел глазом» или «снимал луну так, что видны кратеры». Это камера для тех, кто хочет адреналина от сверхприближения без возни с сумкой объективов — охотников за птицами, родителей на школьных концертах с последних рядов, путешественников, которым лень таскать зеркалку с телевиком.
Вывод: если вы понимаете, что 90% кадров будете делать на среднем и дальнем конце зума, а компактность и лёгкость для вас важнее пиксельной безупречности, HX300 – один из самых доступных билетов в мир суперзума.
📸 Качество фото: когда солнце друг, а вечер – враг
Главная головная боль этой модели — 20-мегапиксельная матрица размером 1/2.3 дюйма. Физика безжалостна: крошечные пиксели собирают мало света, и как только вы уходите с яркого солнца, начинаются шумы. В отзывах полно жалоб: «на компьютере снимки просто ужасны, мыло и пиксели», «при увеличении видно зерно уже на ISO 200». Но есть и те, кто научился жить с этой особенностью. При хорошем дневном освещении, особенно на коротких выдержках, камера выдаёт сочные, яркие кадры с приятной цветопередачей — многие отмечают «реалистичность» и отсутствие излишней насыщенности. Если вручную снизить разрешение до 10 или даже 5 Мп и включить режим «Сумерки с рук» (он делает серию снимков и склеивает в один), шум уходит, и можно получить вполне достойный результат для просмотра на экране или печати размером до 20×30 см при низких ISO. Сравнение с конкурентами: по детализации на длинном конце зума Canon SX50 HS за счёт чуть более крупных пикселей (12 Мп против 20) часто показывает меньше шумов и лучше держит детали, хотя и проигрывает в номинальном разрешении. Nikon Coolpix P520 с 18 Мп даёт схожую картину, но хвалёная цветопередача Nikon многим кажется более холодной. Fujifilm HS50EXR со своим EXR-сенсором предлагает режим пониженного шума, но стоит помнить, что все эти камеры страдают от шумов на маленькой матрице — чудес не бывает.
Вывод: для соцсетей, семейного альбома и просмотра на планшете снимков при дневном свете — отлично. Если же вы привыкли разглядывать каждый кадр на 27-дюймовом мониторе при 100% увеличении, готовьтесь к разочарованию: HX300 не про пиксельный перфекционизм.
🎥 Видеосъёмка: вот где камера оживает
А вот с видео ситуация кардинально иная. Практически все владельцы хвалят именно видео: Full HD 1080 60p со стереозвуком, плавный зум во время записи (хотя шум мотора всё же слышен на тихих сценах) и, что самое главное, потрясающая оптическая стабилизация. «Снимал ходьбу — видео как со штатива», «концерт снял с рук на 50x, все лица разглядел» — таких отзывов масса. Камера реально конкурирует с бытовыми видеокамерами, а по возможностям зума даст им фору. Один нюанс: для максимального качества AVCHD (60p) нужна быстрая карта памяти класса 10; на 4-м классе запись может обрываться при съёмке динамичных сцен. При этом даже в формате FX (на ступень ниже) разница на глаз минимальна. По видеовозможностям HX300 на голову выше Panasonic Lumix FZ72, у которого стабилизация заметно хуже, а картинка менее резкая; Canon SX50 HS тоже пишет хорошее видео, но зум у него чуть короче (50x у обеих, но Canon чуть медленнее фокусируется на дальнем конце).
Вывод: если вы ищете универсальное устройство «фото+видео» с акцентом на видео, HX300 будет отличным выбором. Для чистых фотосъёмок лучше присмотреться к чему-то с более крупной матрицей.
🤖 Автоматика и управление: две стороны Sony
Хваленый Superior Auto mode действительно работает как часы — сам определяет сцену и склеивает HDR-подобные кадры. Но ровно до тех пор, пока вы не столкнётесь с медленной фокусировкой. В отзывах повторяется проблема: при слабом освещении или на максимальном зуме автофокус может «зависать» или вести себя непредсказуемо — так, один пользователь рассказывал, что камера в авторежиме упорно фокусировалась на дереве позади кормушки, пока он не переключился на центральную точку. Ручная фокусировка с кольцом на объективе (ура, почти как на зеркалке!) выручает, но есть серьёзный косяк: иногда в момент полунажатия кнопки спуска ручной фокус сбивается — камера словно пытается включать автофокус, даже когда он переключен в ручной. Лечится переходом в режимы A/S/M, где такого не замечено. По скорости работы: включение довольно быстрое, зуммирование кольцом или рычажком без задержек, а вот запись кадра на карту может занять до 1–2 секунд, что бесит при спортсъёмке — владельцы жалуются, что серийная съёмка 10 кадров в секунду сменяется долгой паузой на сохранение. Это медленнее, чем у Nikon Coolpix P520, который быстрее выгружает буфер.
Вывод: если вы готовы ковыряться в настройках и мириться с задумчивостью автофокуса в сумерках, камера даст вам много ручного контроля. Для чисто «навёл и снял» в любой ситуации лучше поискать более шуструю модель.
🔋 Эргономика, батарея и мелочи быта
Корпус целиком пластиковый и по меркам 2013 года довольно лёгкий (650 г). Для многих это плюс — не оттягивает шею на прогулке, но пластик дешёвый: «похрустывает в руке», «чувствуется, что экономили». Впрочем, конструкция крепкая, не люфтит — за три года один пользователь продержал камеру в пекле и пыли, ничего не сломалось. Аккумулятор NP-BX1 ёмкостью всего 1240 мАч — слабое место. В реальности хватает на 200–300 снимков, а видеосъёмка выжирает его за час. Владельцы в один голос советуют покупать запасной аккумулятор и внешнее зарядное устройство — в комплекте его нет, заряжать можно только через USB в самой камере, что неудобно и лишает возможности снимать во время зарядки. Крышка объектива без верёвочки — колхозьте сами, иначе потеряется (один пользователь привязал за просверленное отверстие). Встроенная вспышка мощная, но при полностью выдвинутом объективе даёт тень. Карты памяти стандартные SD/SDHC/SDXC, но есть нюанс с подключением к компьютеру: для переноса видео в AVCHD нужна фирменная софтина Sony PlayMemories, просто копировать файлы недостаточно — и это бесит многих.
Вывод: камера требует «допиливания» аксессуарами — запасная батарейка и внешняя зарядка обязательны, а с софтом придётся смириться. Комплектация аскетичная, но за свою цену (особенно сейчас на вторичке) это простительно.
🎯 Итоговый портрет: честно о компромиссах
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 — аппарат крайностей. С одной стороны, его 50-кратный зум и стабилизация дают ощущение сверхспособностей, и видео, снятое с рук, выглядит как профессиональный репортаж. С другой — качество фото, особенно в помещении или при слабом свете, оставляет желать лучшего: шумы, потеря деталей, пластилиновая текстура на кропах. По сути, это идеальный инструмент для наблюдателя и видеографа, но не для пиксельного фотографа. Если вы готовы мириться с необходимостью всегда носить запасной аккумулятор, внешнюю зарядку и прикручивать крышечку на верёвочку, а также учиться обходить глюки автофокуса ручными настройками, HX300 станет верным спутником в поездках за дикой природой и на семейных мероприятиях, где важнее «поймать момент», чем получить художественный шедевр.
Выбор за вами: либо абсолютный зум с жирным видео, либо более честная картинка у конкурентов с RAW.
🆚 Топ-5 альтернатив: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 vs конкуренты
Все модели в близком ценовом сегменте ультразумов 2013–2014 годов с оптическим зумом от 42x и более. Выбор строится вокруг компромисса между зумом, качеством картинки и дополнительными функциями.
| Модель | Оптический зум | Видео | RAW / Скорость | Особенности | Вердикт |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canon SX50 HS | 50x | 1080 24p, медленный AF на зуме | RAW есть / буфер быстрее | лучше детализация на высоких ISO | ⚖️ Canon SX50 HS: чуть меньше шумов, есть RAW, зато видео хуже и фокусировка медленнее — для печати снимков предпочтительнее, но как видеорегистратор слабее. |
| Nikon Coolpix P520 | 42x | 1080 30p | RAW нет / серия быстрее | GPS, поворотный экран | ✅ Nikon Coolpix P520: проигрывает в зуме и стабилизации, но быстрее серийная съёмка и есть GPS — для тревел-журналиста, которому важно геотегирование, а 42x достаточно. |
| Panasonic Lumix FZ72 | 60x | 1080 50i | RAW есть / медленный | очень длинный зум, но тёмный объектив | ❌ Panasonic FZ72: зум ещё длиннее, но на 60x картинка мыльнее, стабилизация хуже — реальное преимущество только при съёмке статики со штатива, в остальном комфортнее снимать на Sony. |
| Fujifilm HS50EXR | 42x | 1080 60p | RAW есть / очень быстрый AF | ручной зум-кольцо, фазовый AF | ⚖️ Fujifilm HS50EXR: фазовый автофокус мгновенный, ручной зум как на зеркалке, RAW в комплекте, но зум короче — если динамика кадра важнее дальности, Fuji выигрывает, но цена была выше. |
| Sony HX200V | 30x | 1080 60p | RAW нет / GPS встроен | предшественник с лучшей сборкой и GPS | ✅ Sony HX200V: почти такой же видео, лучше фокусировка в темноте, крепче корпус и есть GPS, но зум 30x — если 50x не принципиален, HX200V даёт более сбалансированные ощущения. |
Среди прямых ультразумов того времени HX300 остаётся самым мощным по зуму и стабилизации для видео. Однако его главный недостаток — мыльность фотографий на 100% кропе — обходит Canon SX50 HS за счёт RAW и более умеренного мегапиксельного перегруза, а Fuji HS50EXR берёт скоростью и надёжностью фокуса. Если вам нужен именно 50x и отличное видео, альтернатив по сути нет за эти деньги; если же качество снимков важнее, уходите в сторону меньшего зума с RAW и более крупным сенсором.
👍Почему стоит купить Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 - Преимущества по отзывам пользователей
- Мощный оптический зум 50x (эквивалент 24-1200 мм):
- Позволяет снимать дальние объекты (птиц, луну, людей на 200-300 м) с деталями, лучше бинокля.
- Цифровой зум до 100x сохраняет приемлемое качество, полезен для фотоохоты и пейзажей.
- Широкий угол на 24 мм захватывает больше сцены без отхода назад.
- Отличная оптическая стабилизация изображения:
- Снимает четко с рук на 50x, даже в движении или при слабом свете (до 1/60 с выдержкой).
- Работает на видео, позволяя ходить и зуммировать без тряски, как на штативе.
- Минимизирует смаз от мелких вибраций на большом зуме.
- Качественная видеосъемка в Full HD (1080p 60/50 fps):
- Плавная запись с зумом, стереозвук четкий, лучше многих видеокамер.
- Зум работает бесшумно или слабо заметно, стабилизация делает видео профессиональным.
- Снимает динамику (спорт, концерты, природу) с фокусом на лица.
- Умные авторежимы (Superior Auto, Intelligent Auto):
- Автоматически распознает сцену, делает несколько кадров и собирает лучший без шумов.
- Хорошо работает в сумерках, на солнце, с движением, без вспышки.
- Подходит новичкам, дает реалистичные фото с естественными цветами.
- Удобное управление и эргономика:
- Кольцо на объективе для зума/фокуса как на зеркалке, точное и быстрое.
- Положительный хват, колеса для ISO/экспозиции под рукой.
- Поворотный LCD-экран (3") для съемки сверху/снизу, яркий и четкий.
- Ручные режимы PASM и множество функций:
- Полная ручка (диафрагма, выдержка, ISO до 12800), брекетинг, HDR.
- Панорама, макро (от 1 см), эффекты (миниатюра, акварель).
- 10 fps серийная съемка для динамики (дети, спорт).
- Реалистичная цветопередача и качество в хорошем свете:
- Сочные, естественные цвета без пересыщения, детали в тенях/светах.
- Печать до 13x19" или 20x30" на низком ISO (80-400).
- Вспышка мощная, освещает портреты до 10 м.
👎О чем стоит задуматься перед покупкой - Недостатки по отзывам пользователей
- Шумы и низкое качество фото из-за маленькой матрицы (1/2.3") и 20 МП:
- Видны на ISO 400+, даже на 80 при 100% просмотре или большом зуме.
- Реальное разрешение ~10-12 МП, интерполяция делает "мыло" при кропе.
- Хуже зеркалок/смартфонов в помещении/ночью без вспышки.
- Слабый аккумулятор (NP-BX1):
- Хватает на 200-500 снимков или 1 час видео, садится быстро при зуме/просмотре.
- Зарядка только через камеру (USB), нет внешнего ЗУ в комплекте.
- Вспышка и видео ускоряют разряд.
- Крышка объектива без шнурка:
- Легко теряется или болтается, приходится дорабатывать самостоятельно.
- Объектив негерметичный, пыль попадает внутрь.
- Люфт объектива при выдвижении.
- Медленный фокус и запись в сложных условиях:
- Задержка 1-2 с в низком свете, на 50x или движущихся объектах.
- Пауза после снимка (2-3 с) мешает серийной съемке детей/животных.
- Автофокус путает планы (дерево за птицей), нужен центр/ручной.
- Хлипкий пластиковый корпус:
- Скрипит в хвате, легкий, но кажется игрушкой.
- Большой размер (не карманный), тяжелее компактов.
- Экран не поворачивается горизонтально, царапается.
- Плохой электронный видоискатель (EVF):
- Низкое разрешение, размытый для фокуса/зума.
- Лучше использовать LCD, но в солнце бликует.
- Нет авто-переключения с экраном.
- Шумы на видео и отсутствие RAW:
- Звук зума/шаттера слышен, нет микрофонного входа.
- Только JPEG, нет RAW для постобработки.
- Видео в AVCHD требует фирменного ПО для ПК.
*Плюсы и минусы, которые пользователи называют чаще всего на основе практического опыта использования.
235 отзывов пользователей о Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
Пользовались
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Скромный эксперт
18.06.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Let me say this first: I'm an amateur photographer, and an average one at that (my wife is the skilled one in this department - I'm an audio guy). However, I'd expect that I'm who this is aimed at: someone who likes taking photos, enjoys good technology, understands what makes a good photo, and wants to go beyond what a point-and-shoot does without lugging around a dSLR with multiple lenses. So that's the perspective from which this is written.First of all, this is a bridge camera - looks like an dSLR but isn't (nor does it have interchangeable lenses), acts kinda like a point-and-shoot but delivers more. So to compare it to one my wife's Canon dSLR with a $600 macro lens on it is an exercise in futility. But even then... it almost holds its own, and in some ways I MUCH prefer it. I'll get to that in a minute.Sizewise, it's between the two types: it's not pocketable, but more compact and easy to carry than a dSLR. Its comfortable to hold, with the plastic construction striking a nice balance: it's light but doesn't feel cheap. Controls fall easily to hand, and it handles quite well in my hands as well as my 12-year-old's; anyone can pick it up and shoot easily. It's the perfect thing to take on a family outing, frankly.When you shoot, you can simply leave it in auto mode (Sony's calling the full auto Enhanced Superior Auto, which is actually aptly named) and let it do its thing, and even in this mode I find photo quality to be excellent. When you start opening up the toolbox of shooting modes though (and start using that amazing zoom), things get even better.It has a ton of feature, from those you'd expect to those you wouldn't: exposure and aperture priority; tons of preset programs like portrait, landscape, sport, night, etc; exposure bracketing; color saturation selection; optical image stabilization; selectable focus areas; a great panorama mode; very cool picture effects like miniaturize, partial color, and watercolor; 10 frame-per-second shooting at full 20 MP resolution. There are many more as well, so hit Sony's site if you want the full list.But the real star of the show is that lens. With 50x optical zoom you've got a camera with the equivalent of a 24mm to 1200mm zoom, which is ridiculous. At the wide end it jams way more into the photo than any of my other cameras, and at the long end, well, just wow. And that "wow" isn't even even considering the digital zoom portion which is WAY better than any I've used before. It's so good, in fact, that I don't disable it right off the bat, the way I always have in the past.For an example of the extreme difference in wide to zoom, take a look at the photos of the kiteboarder I put in the customer photo gallery. It's really staggering. That day I also shot some people standing down the beach - at wide, I could barely see them, at full zoom I could read the logo on the woman's sunglasses. Just so much fun.How's the quality? Unlike some of what I've read, I find the image quality to be wonderful. I keep hearing about artifacts, but honestly they just aren't an issue in most situations; if they are, you probably ought to be shooting with a dSLR instead. I've enlarged and printed quite a few photos with fantastic results and have no complaints there.Video mode is excellent as well, and I've had no issues. That amazing zoom comes into play again, getting closer and closer well past when you expect it to stop. Just wonderful, and loads of fun.Other neat things: macro mode is automatic; the LCD display slides and tilts, allowing shooting from well above or well below the camera (like over a crowd, etc); the flash is manually popped up, which I like (I'm aware this could be debatable, but I don't like it popping up unexpectedly); and there's a focus/zoom ring at the end of the lens (switchable between those modes) for those that grew up twisting the lens rather than pushing switches. I LOVE that.The only negatives I can think of: no RAW mode, which really is a bit of a drag at this price-point, but at least I don't burn up space using it; no auto-switching between monitors - you hit a button to switch between the rear LCD and viewfinder LCD and since I'm used to SLRs I keep putting it up to my eye and am surprised when there's no image; it uses a battery pack that won't allow AA batteries to be used in a pinch. That's IT.Overall, I love this thing. It's my go-to camera now (I even used the amazing zoom to figure out if a bump in the middle of the pond by my house was an alligator - it was) in almost any situation (if I don't want to lug something, I'll just use my phone), can be used fast and easy in standard mode, and provides tons of fun in the programmable and artistic modes.If you want the absolute finest photos possible, I suppose you should look at a multi-thousand dollar dSLR with multiple lenses.But if you want fantastic photos in an easy to use and carry camera that just happens to have a zoom lens that the NSA would find useful, grab the HX300.It's just aw
Скромный эксперт
01.06.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
First, let me say I fully appreciate all of the comments about the camera in these posts and those in particular by Thomas Wheeler. They have been very helpful in learning how best to use the camera though I have also spent a lot of time reading the online manual and studying many of the reviews of the camera. I was attracted to its advertised specs, the favorable reviews, and the way it felt and handled. I bought the camera about 3+ weeks ago from Amazon and have since taken over 1000 pics and several videos and have come to several conclusions about how I have been able to best achieve the most satisfying pictures for me.I very much like the camera's handling, the quick ready-to-shoot time from turn-on, the quick focus (especially, in high contrast situations), the zoom ring which is very handy for zoom and composition adjustments, the short shot-to-shot times, and the image stabilization system which works very well at long zooms. I am using a SanDisk Extreme SDHC Class 10 memory chip rated at 45 mb/sec. Camera responsiveness has been very good. I have not used a tripod with any of my pics.I generally shoot still shots in the Program ("P") mode where I can control ISO and let the camera determine the best shutter and aperture settings, but I also have taken pics in several of the "Scene" settings and have used the "Superior Auto" setting to let the camera determine the scene and best camera settings with the highest quality.I try to keep the shutter speed short, take pics with bright sun, and well-light settings inside and outside. I also work to keep the ISO at or below 400, around 200, if possible. I have also set the internal sharpening and contrast camera settings to "+".Overall, I have found I get the crispest shots with bright sun, low ISO, high shutter speed, and very high contrast between the subject and its surroundings when using the "P" mode dial setting, even at high zoom. With such conditions, the pics turn out almost razor sharp, with little or no post editing needed even with very high zoom (<= 40x). I have taken some stunningly sharp shots, including macro, near zoom, and distant zoom ones under the aforementioned favorable conditions. The inherent camera focusing system seems to "love" (perform best in) the high contrast, bright light scenario because it seems to work its best then regardless of zoom setting to produce very sharply focused pics. Yes, you must hold the camera very, very steady (as noted in other posts) to allow the Image Stabilization System to do its best as well at long zooms.The low light situation seems to be this camera's Achilles' heel because shooting under this condition is something I am still working on to get a satisfying picture. The camera tends to use high ISOs (and thus, introduces more noise) to compensate for low light, but so far, in the case, most of my pictures show that much clarity and detail are being lost probably due to the low aperture setting, and small image sensor, in particular at the high end of the zoom. Engaging a longer shutter speed (as opposed to higher ISO) in this case may be an alternative. I am also still exploring the in-door "people" picture situation, too. Though I have taken a number of such pictures, I am still working on achieving the best lighting "set-up" indoors with and without flash, but I tend to shoot outdoors in the landscape, wildlife, or macro modes mostly so I have not been very troubled by this yet. It has been suggested that the "Superior Auto" Mode on the camera is a good way to take indoor portrait shots w/o the necessary use of flash.In most cases and situations that I have experienced so far, the camera also seems inclined to produce fairly soft, smooth "edges" around the outline of the subject and surrounding objects regardless of the mode dial/camera settings used and situation. This may be result of the built-in noise reduction system and the fact that the camera has a pretty small image sensor considering the use of its 20+ mp design. These soft edges around objects may appeal to some people because they do appear smoother and somewhat more natural to the naked eye, but I generally prefer sharper edges and have explored using the "Unsharp mask" editing feature within the camera after shooting the image. This definitely helps make the edges much, much crisper which I favor and find more satisfying, but what I don't like is that you have no control over how much the picture is sharpened when using the camera's Unsharp mask, while a photo editing program like "Picasa" or "Photoshop Elements" allows you to determine how much sharpening you want to apply. The camera's adjustment may be just right given the picture taken however as I have also experienced. In any case, as a result of these available options, I can now sharpen any of my pictures as much as I like. This has greatly improved the overall crispness of my images in spite of the aforementioned camera design limitations which is not
Скромный эксперт
28.05.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
First, I am a Sony Digital fan. In 2001 I purchased my first Sony Digital Camera, a 3.2MP Mavica with Carl Zeiss Lens and I thought it served me well for 5 years before moving into semi-pro DSLR cameras with Nikon (D200 and later D7000). Once you step into DSLR-s, it's hard to be a fan of Point-and-shoot cameras. However, this year, I purchased 2 Sony point-and-shoot cameras for my family (the HX10V and WX-50) and received this one for review from Amazon. I was not going to go back to point and shoot - until I got this camera. It is not a perfect camera, yet it has some unbeatable features (The Zoom for pictures and video) that would be very expensive in the DSLR option. I wanted to use it frequently during at least a month before settling on a review for Amazon.NOTE ON THE (AMAZON) AVERAGE STARS for this camera.If you are like me, you look for the average number of stars for Amazon products. In April 2013, this camera had an average 3.5 stars while the HX200 (last year's model) had an average of 4.5 stars despite being an inferior camera in my opinion (no GPS or flip-out screen on the HX300, yet more than 2X better zoom). At the end of May 2013, the HX300 moved up to 4 stars. Even on Snapsort (a site for camera comparisons), the HX300 now scores 1 point higher than the HX200 (a month ago, the HX200 scored higher).MUST HAVE ACCESSORY: A 55-mm UV filter. I recommend Hoya 55mm HMC UV Digital Multi-Coated Slim Frame Glass Filter. I accidentally fell with my camera, and the only thing that cracked was this filter, the lens was fine. Got a replacement right away.3 REVIEWING ITEMS and my (subjective) grades:BASIC PICTURES - 3.5 STARS. I looks at some other reviews that praised the quality of the pictures yet I was surprised at the large amount of bad pictures I took. And I used other point and shoot cameras for comparison. The Intelligent Auto can be very misleading - I can be zooming in on someone 50 feet away and the info reads it as a macro. I would not recommend this camera to a person new to photography - it is also relatively bulky. Once I adjusted the camera settings manually, I was able to take better pictures. I am also not impressed with the panoramic mode and the way pictures are combined - I believe some less expensive cameras are better at that. One last thing on this topic: in my opinion, the 350 pixels per inch for high quality is nowhere close to cameras with a larger sensor that have 300 or less PPI.SUPER-ZOOM - 5 STARSFor a DSLR to have this type of zoom range, you may have to spend thousands. I can finally took nice pictures of the moon (I uploaded a picture under customer images) and of birds from far away - especially if I use a tripod. I was able to take relatively good pictures of my son playing soccer even right after sunset. Some of the reviewers are disappointed with the quality of pics at full zoom. I got my lesson while taking a picture of the moon: even though I used a tripod, I could see the image shaking from even the lightest vibration and wind gust when focused on the moon. I placed my camera on 2 second delay (with tripod of course) to get the best results. The auto-image stabilizer really does a great job - otherwise all pics would be shaken. Every time you add to the zoom, chances for shake are increased exponentially. That is why cameras such as the wx-50 can have 4.5 stars even though the zoom is only 5X.VIDEO - 5 StarsThe most memorable experience was when I took this camera to some choir practices and performances held at a mega church. During practice, I held it in my hands. During performance, I used a tripod. I can say that both videos look great on a 50-in TV. I sat in rows 6-7, in front of me there was some open 12-15ft.of space, then about 10 stairs, then some more space (20-25ft) for the performance area, and only in the back there were the bleachers for the choir. I could film the entire choir (each row had about 35 kids) at once, then zoom in to focus on just 1 or 2 faces at one time. I really felt like a kid in candy land with this feature. The focus may not work 100% of the time right away, yet it is very quick to adjust. I definitely prefer this camera even over my digital Camcorder. You can even take pictures while recording video.TOTAL: 4.5 STARS - as a basic camera, I would give it 3-3.5 Stars. As a super-zoom camera for those who understand how to make manual adjustments, I would give it 5. I have to admit - I've been struggling for a month whether this is a 4 star or 5 star product. The limited focus in low light pictures made me go for the 4.UPDATE 6/10/13 After playing with the multiple frame feature at the pool, I have to say that I'm impressed with the 8-10 frames per second feature. I asked my son to do some flips while jumping in the pool and they turned out great - even on a 50-in TV. One neat thing about the camera: you can go through the multiple frames by simply tilting your camera after you take the pictures. I am so impressed with the quality
Скромный эксперт
30.04.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Summary: Only this camera empowers me to quickly tweak focus, freeze framing a duck on the other side of a large lake, or a Robin bathing in a neighbor's birdbath -- complete with the individual water droplets falling from that duck's bill as she drinks, or flying off that robin as she shakes herself dry.- - - -Concurring with the positive reviews, I write to highlight essential points.::::: (1) Image Quality (IQ) :::::Some blame "20 megapixels" for the poor IQ of their disappointing photos. Reality check: you can *choose* 20, 15, 10 or 5mp as the default. Some just generally declare "bad IQ" at the extreme zoom end; others love the IQ. The reason you're seeing such opposing opinions likely comes down to one fact: 50x zoom is new to us all. Some learn how to tame all that power; some don't. (More on this issue at #5&6 below.) Incidentally, Noise Reduction errs on the side of details (thankfully!), rather than smearing; configure as desired, in the Settings.::::: (2) "Superior Auto" Modes :::::There are two, one with a "Plus" designation. Plus adds a sort of *realistic* HDR, among other features; you'll hear machine-gun shutter snaps--- Sony uniquely blends them all into one final picture. Thus, you can not burst shoot while in SAP, but it is available in SA. Great surprise: each mode is pretty darn good! (Hanging out in auto mode when testing a new camera = cheat sheet to inherent firmware flaws. I've experienced no deal-breakers here.) It's even smart enough to apply a bokeh effect re zooms! (Still learning EXACTLY when I can expect that to kick in.) Scene modes are also quite helpful, and exploitable for more than the described purpose.::::: (3) Lens, Zoom :::::The lens is threaded for 55mm filters. (See #10) . . . . The headliner 50x optical zoom is complimented by at least 100x "ClearZoom." The latter delights *much* more frequently than disappoints. Toggle it on/off in the settings. There's a separate toggle for straight "digital zoom," which I keep off.::::: (4) NeatOh! :::::There's a customizable (limited) button on the top of the camera (oddly placed), & a *convenient* rotating push-in ribbed wheel that keeps, e.g. exposure compensation immediately accessible -- right hand for both. Optional always-present histogram & grid on screen; one tap to change/remove it on the fly (right hand, thumb).::::: (5) Mechanics :::::Zooming is reliably fast, as is auto tracking focus. Even at max zoom (50x & 100-140x), IF you adequately brace yourself. Think: you know 20x magnifies your slightest shake; whaddaya think 50x will do? Failing to respect that reality, and prepping yourself accordingly, results in eye-assaulting photos. Likewise, the complex nature of some scenes induces auto focus woes. Quickly curable, thanks to Sony's smart Plan B-- the zoom/focus ring, with a no-eyes-required ridiculously-easy-to-manipulate flip switch (auto/manual focus, left side). . . On the other hand, while snapping itself is fast, an irritating but tolerable wait-state materializes in burst mode's aftermath, per writing the shots to a Class 10 card.::::: (6) Image Stabilization :::::The system is golden. But expect no miracles when mimicking a modified version of a rapper within a mile of a microphone. Extreme zoom (50x/optical; 100--140x/ClearZoom) power is new to us all! Each additional mm of zoom necessitates additional care in bracing yourself. Approach the HX300 with related humility ("I don't know diddly 'bout handling a 50x+ camera, so I NEED to be super conscious of my body"), genuinely respect/ learn/ tame it, & you'll be a happy camper. Approach it in the same manner as a less-than-half(!!!) the zoom camera, and the predictable "ugh!" results will spark a bullet-speed return. Bottom-line: This NEW & INTENSE degree of zoom = doom, unless/until you develop bracing techniques (plural!) to harness all that power, AND study the options of *this* camera as well as *its* unique sweet spots. Don't misread me here -- experience via other cameras is helpful. But old-school kinda-braced ain't gonna cut it. Trial & error = my/your BFF. But I assure you, it IS doable! I own a tripod and monopod, which I've yet to use here. Was the learning curve frustrating? You betcha. Worth it? Oooo baby, you better believe it!::::: (7) You Can D/L the PDF Manual, Now :::::The full 240 page PDF user manual is linked at dpreview >> Forums >> Sony Cybershot >> search: hx300 PDF. While I rarely RTFM, the HX300's incredible reach alone inspired grabbing & studying that manual while awaiting delivery. Time well spent, as I have zero complaints about image quality, zooming or focusing. At the very least, play CliffNotes by studying the charts outlining what features are available per mode (starts around p80).::::: (8) A Winning Review :::::(March 30, 2013 - Amateur Photographer)For those who depend on formal reviewers for camera purchasing, FYI: This UK zine (Zinio on iPad, Web) reviews ultrazooms from Sony, Canon, Fuji & Nikon, awarding first place
Скромный эксперт
28.04.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
The HX300 is a megazoom bridge camera. It's fairly large when compared to typical digicams. However, it is still smaller than most DSLRs, if even by only a little. Ergonomically, the camera feels good. The body is constructed of plastic which makes the camera lighter than it appears. I personally like the controls placement. Everything is neatly and logically arranged. The top has jog and mode dials which should be familiar to anyone who has previously used a DSLR or bridge camera before. There were no head scratching moments when looking for controls or features.Size and Weight---------------The size and weight of the HX300 are pretty decent for the type. It fits somewhere in the middle on the size scale for bridge cameras. For example, it's larger than the Canon SX50 but smaller than the Fuji HS50. The plastic body looks deceivingly heavy but is actually lighter than I expected. I have no problems handholding the camera for steady shots, but personally, this would be strictly a specialty camera and not my first choice to lug around somewhere like Disney World all day. That's not a knock against the camera because even my smaller (body) NEX 5N isn't my first choice. That would be my Canon S100, a tiny camera that takes excellent stills, video and is small enough to be unobtrusive while I'm running around the park. The HX300 would be my first choice for sporting events, wildlife photography, vacation photos around the resort (where I could easily stow the camera away when finished), weddings, graduations, shows, or any other event where I would benefit from having as long a zoom as possible. That's not to say the HX300 won't make a suitable every day camera, because it most certainly would. I just prefer not to haul a large camera around all day, and make no mistake, this is a large camera when compared to standard non-megazoom digicams.Performance-----------Performance so far has pretty decent. The camera starts up relatively quickly and the auto-focus is very good with no excessive hunting. The controls are conveniently placed and everything is within easy reach. The menus are logically arranged and super easy to navigate, even easier than my NEX touchscreen. The speed is great. I sometimes get a little shutter lag in dim light depending upon the circumstances, even with the flash enabled, but at least so far I've experienced no excessive write delays between shots. In bright light, like an outdoor sunny day, there is no delay whatsoever and the camera is very snappy and responsive. That's important for shooting situations like an outdoor sporting event, where a slow camera can really ruin your day. So far, I've had no problems focusing on moving subjects, even fast moving. There is no RAW mode which is sort of a bummer for enthusiasts but won't bother most shooters. The quality of the jpegs can range from excellent to downright awful. More on that in the next paragraph. Video mode shoots 1080p video. Focusing during video is usually good and the internal microphone does a decent job of capturing sounds without excessive background or wind noise. You can zoom during recording without excessive internal mechanical noises ruining the sound. It has a dedicated video button, so switching from still to video mode is not only easier but also allows both to be used simultaneously. It also eliminates the possibility of mixing up the two while shooting. I've had numerous occasions where I've missed still shots on other cameras due to forgetting to turn the dial back to still after shooting a video clip. The rear tilting 3" LCD is very sharp. The sharpness is a double edge sword because sometimes pics look great on the LCD until transferred to a larger screen. You can adjust the brightness and resolution on the rear LCD to conserve battery life. The LCD doesn't swing outward, so no easy self-portraits. That's not a big deal for me personally, but it may be for some. It also has an EVF that actually isn't too bad. Burst mode so far has been okay but I only tested it sparingly and admittedly haven't yet gone beyond 5 or so frames, which all came out great in good light.Image quality--------------Image quality is sometimes a mixed bag. For example, I took numerous outdoor and indoor shots in a variety of lighting conditions, from partly-cloudy to bright and sunny. Most of the pictures taken outdoors in perfect lighting came out perfect, not surprisingly. Focus was spot-on and the images were sharp, clear and colors were vibrant, even when enlarged. None of the pictures taken in the overcast conditions were keepers. Some were mediocre while others were downright terrible, with tons of artifacts and pretty shoddy focus especially at the far end of the zoom. I can forgive the bad photos at the far end of the zoom, especially taken hand-held, but I honestly expected a little better dim light outdoor performance. However, the most perplexing photos were the ones taken in bright sunl
Скромный эксперт
23.04.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Despite being a professional photographer I have a variety of point-and-shoot pocket cameras for family events, vacations and just having fun and I will let you know right now nothing included in my review will be techie, just real-life things that can help you decide if this is the camera for you.Recently, adding to my collection of little pocket cameras, I acquired an Olympus XZ-1 in an attempt to get better results than I've previously experienced with low-end pocket cameras and it does an admirable job while still remaining portable. The DSC-HX300 is not pocketable, it is what is known as a "bridge" camera. I've generally thought of bridge cameras (SLR-like with non-detachable zoom lenses) as a compromise ... almost as large and heavy as a real DSLR, lacking the versatility of swappable lenses, tiny sensor, mediocre lens and much too automated. But I do realize that all consumer-grade cameras just keep getting better and better and if you read on you will hopefully get some insight about the capabilities of the Sony HX300 and how it compares to state-of-the-art.This is the first Sony-brand camera that I've owned, although I did early development work with them regarding the original Mavica digital cameras. I respect their ability to design and manufacturer most of their components in-house, especially after they acquired the photographic experience of Konica/Minolta. The DSC HX300 can safely be called a "premium" bridge camera as it reigns with only a couple of other similar cameras in worthwhile features.As I said, I'll avoid getting techie in this review; there are well-established resources for that. Nor will I republish the specs which can be found at the Sony website or compare a consumer-grade camera with a $5000 professional DSLR. Just a real-life user report that I hope will help you decide if this model is what you're looking for.WHO WOULD BUY THIS CAMERA?Likely the #1 reason someone might choose the DSC HX300 is the astonishing zoom range of 24mm - 1200mm (35mm equivalent). Even with a pro DSLR a zoom of that magnitude would not be something you would use handheld and you certainly wouldn't want to take a DSLR fitted with a 1000mm lens on a family outing to Disneyland. For all of its extreme zoom power, the overall camera weighs lighter than an entry-level Canon or Nikon DSLR with a stock 18mm - 55mm lens attached. Because the camera is much larger and heavier than a compact pocket camera and less enabled than a DSLR this is probably not going to be your one and only camera, however the HX300 defines why bridge cameras exist and for most people would certainly be well suited as an all-in-one still/video camera for that Disneyland trip. At its price and relative sophistication of controls the average user will probably use it to take to sporting events and other such applications where an extreme zoom lens is important. That describes how I will use it, I doubt it will ever be a "take everywhere" camera to me.A very likely target audience for a camera with a zoom of such range would be those with a love of birding, and well they should, the zoom range is quite mindboggling. The best analogy would be to compare the results to using a fine pair of Monarch model binoculars for birding compared with a decent low price pair. With the lower-priced scope you will certainly see the bird and be able to recognize it but the image will lack crispness and richness of color. The HX300 isn't a bad choice for birding, one should simply be aware that the image may fall short of the glory of detail a quality pair of binoculars can deliver.FEATURES AND CONSTRUCTION:The camera makes good use of the plastic construction, feeling solid in the hand but not fragile. The second best feature, in my opinion, is the large ring around the lens which is the perfect place to place your hand to steady shots being taken at long zoom ranges. That ring can be used to manually zoom the lens (much better than using a tiny rocker switch on the camera body, although the DSC HX300 has one of those too if you prefer). By flicking a large switch, which is placed in exactly the right location for your left thumb, the ring can be turned into a manual focus ring. That combo on a camera of this type is absolutely brilliant. Well done, Sony! But DON'T expect that ring to have the exact feel to it that any DSLR has ... it is a "fly by wire" type, which means turning the ring simply activates a motor that controls the zoom or focus function. There is significant lag before the command is received and executed and not a lot of precision. Once you get used to it, the benefit of having the zoom/focus ring on the lens makes you promise you would never want to give it up.The camera has both a large 3" high-resolution articulated (up/down)LCD on the back and a decent electronic viewfinder (EVF) that is bright and sharp. I suspect when zooming in tightly on something most users would prefer to use the EVF so they can brace the camera against th
Скромный эксперт
24.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
A couple of things about me, and what I needed in a camera. First of all, while I have some basic understandings of how these kinds of cameras work, I am not a professional techie guy, and I usually have to look up every spec I read and usually end up not getting it entirely. I did do a lot of research, but the Camera Spec Snobs in some of the review sites just go to an extreme that will never, ever matter to me. Second, this camera was a replacement for my old bridge camera, a Sony DSC H-5 (12X optical, 7.2 megapixel). That camera served me well over the past 6 years, after thousands upon thousands of images. I bring this up because there have been a mountain of improvements on all technological fronts since then, which has resulted in an entirely and spectacularly different photographic experience I am having with this new camera after only a few days, and may explain my giddy five star love-fest I am having with this thing! I use my camera for everything from artistic photos to nature photography to family events, so I want a camera that shoots great, better than average pictures in a variety of circumstances over a specialized camera that takes outstanding pictures in limited circumstances.Unlike many other reviewers (but most probably like the majority of shoppers), I do not own several high end cameras and am therefore not going to be comparing this one to my other high end camera that I bought last year. So, in my comparison, all I can say is if you have an older bridge camera that seems to be losing a bit of steam and you are looking to replace it, look no further. You don't have to spend hours fretting over this spec and that, when you get this camera and take a few pictures you will feel like you did as a kid when you replaced that brownie camera with your first 35mm! The improvements made over that past half decade make the experience like night and day!Every problem that I had with my old one is gone (or at least vastly improved) with this new one. That purply fringe line you sometimes got on the edges of your subject, or that white glare that seemed almost neon in brightness on a sunny day? Gone. That problem with focusing on a fast moving object? Gone. The blurry images from moving objects in anything but bright sunlight? Vastly improved. The issue of losing all definition of dark areas if anything was remotely back-lit? There is a setting called HDR on this camera that makes it possible to take those pictures you just didn't even bother trying before. That problem with taking indoor shots without flash where the quality was so low you never shared the pictures with anyone? Oh my God, what a difference.Like my old camera, this one has a fully automatic setting, settings that allow you to over-ride some of the auto settings and others to completely over-ride the auto settings. It also has a large variety of other specialized settings, like "pet" or "portrait" that adjusts things for certain scenarios. In the cases of "landscape", "hdr", and "background de-focus", the camera's auto setting seems to do this for you. The macro setting is also automatic, coming on when your lens gets close enough. Over time, I will learn all these new settings, because I know that sometimes, the auto setting will misread the situation and I will want to be able to adjust. However, I am really impressed with this cameras ability to auto adjust well.The quality of my pictures are stunning. If I crop in to a ridiculous, unreal point and compare it to a picture taken by a $2000.00 DSLR, would I notice a difference in crispness? Probably, but I will leave that debate to the spec snobs. While they are busy fretting over such things, I will be in the mountains taking awesome pictures of my grandkids in the snow, and enjoying my camera. Color, composition, saturation, detail, contrast, etc. are all outstanding with this camera. Details that my older camera could not pick up just stand out like crazy with this one. The camera is not magic, my black lab running in the white snow on a back-lit landscape still comes out as just a pure black shadow, but in less extreme situations, this camera is doing an awesome job.And that crazy, insane 50X lens! First off, on the wide end, 24mm is much wider than my old 36mm and the difference is phenomenal. But when you go off the other end, I just cannot describe what happens. I have pictures of a building on a hill where you can see people on a deck, then you zoom out and that building is just the tiniest spec on your picture. I love birds, and am really looking forward to taking this out and getting details I never could before.Played a bit with the video, and frankly I have a lot of homework to do on it. One thing I did notice though, is that the anti-shake technology on this camera made some of my video shots look like a pro took them with a tripod.Bottom line, this camera is awesome. I have three situations where I took a picture and was stunned by t
Скромный эксперт
21.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Over the years as a serious amateur photographer I have owned and used extensively Nikon and Hasselblad film cameras and lenses and when digital cameras arrived I began with the Nikon Coolpix 900 and 950, then DSLR's including the Canon EOS 10D, and today I am using a Canon 5D Mark II equipped with L lenses (Canon's premium glass). The Sony HX300 is my first super zoom camera, and as such I spent several hours after receiving the camera from Amazon on March 14 thoroughly reading and studying both the Sony pdf manual and the Sony User's Guide in html format. This was time well spent as there are many useful features on the HX300 that are not found even on my much more expensive Canon 5D Mark II. During this study with both manuals, I tried each feature in the quiet of my living room making sure I understood exactly how the feature worked and what it did. Only then did I set out to explore the performance of the Sony HX300 under "real world" conditions and to compare it to the Canon 5D Mark II under controlled conditions.The two most import things about any camera are its image quality and its performance in actual shooting sessions. Image quality is, of course, a combination of many things including the camera's ability to resolve detail, to properly expose scenes shot under a variety of lighting conditions, color quality, absence of both chroma and luminance noise, etc. Performance is how responsive the camera is and includes such items as how quickly the camera is ready to take a picture after being turned on, the time delay between shots in single shot mode, the ability of the camera's autofocus to work quickly and accurately without "searching", and certainly in the case of a super zoom camera its ability to smoothly and rapidly zoom through its entire set of focal lengths. For a camera of its price and likely use, the Sony HX300 does a remarkably good job of providing high quality images and a very responsive camera.My first test of image quality was to simply walk around my yard and the neighborhood taking images of a variety of flowers that were in early bloom as well as taking pictures of birds coming to the bird feeder in our backyard from about 75 feet away using the Sony HX300 at full zoom. In virtually every single situation the HX300's autofocus was very quick and very accurate, and the powered zoom using the lever on the shutter release was highly responsive and quite fast. The images produced had exquisite detail with good highlight detail retention, perfect color rendition, very good exposures in auto modes, and under these cloudy but bright daylight circumstances with the camera working at low ISO's very low noise. These images straight out of the camera with no post-processing looked very good to excellent. Using very small amounts of post processing mainly to slightly sharpen the images, I was able to obtain excellent large prints (13 X 19 in.) using my Epson 3800 Pro large format printer. The shots of birds on the feeder at the maximum optical zoom (1200 mm) of the HX300 were all hand held, in focus, and showed good detail, albeit not equal to the ISO 80 shots previously described. With one exception (vide infra), I had absolutely no problem hand-holding and autofocusing these 1200 mm maximum zoom shots. The one exception is when I happen to line up a tree in the shot that was about 50 feet behind the bird feeder. In that case, the HX300 always wanted to focus on the texture of the tree trunk behind the feeder. The feeder is plastic without high contrast. I was able to solve the problem completely by switching the focus mode from multi-autofocus to center auto-focus and placing the center focus frame in the EVF on the edge of the bird feeder where there was sufficient contrast for the focusing system to work properly. This initial collection of maximum zoom shots brought home an important lesson about super zoom lenses including the Carl Zeiss lens on the HX300. Remember that the HX300's lens has a maximum aperture of 6.3 at 1200 mm and therefore the ISO will be set at higher values (400-800) to provide a sufficiently fast shutter speed to allow the camera to be hand-held at such a zoom setting. Of course, the higher the ISO, the higher the visible chroma and luma noise in the captured image. I found that these outdoor shots at 1200 mm zoom on a cloudy but not overcast day came in at ISO 800 and a shutter speed of 1/160 - 1/250 sec. The maximum zoom shots were reasonably sharp, but benefitted from noise removal in post-processing which, of course, is always a compromise between detail and noise reduction. Nonetheless, these images gave quite good prints and beautiful images up to 11 X 14 in. I believe with experience I can hand-hold maximum zoom shots at shutter speeds even below 1/160 second and manually set ISO to 200 and achieve even better maximum zoom shots. I think it will be difficult and perhaps impossible to get good maximum zoom images with excellent detai
Показаны отзывы 1-8 из 235.
Как менялась цена на Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
Характеристики Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
Информация о характеристиках носит справочный характер.
Перед покупкой уточняйте характеристики и комплектацию товара у продавца
Обзоры и руководства на Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
Альтернативы с более высокой оценкой
Wizemart © 2026.
Рекомендательная система по умному выбору товаров по отзывам и рейтингам
