У нас 28 120 272 отзывов

на 556 023 товаров

Отзывы о Мфу Canon Pixma TS3340

7376 отзывов пользователей о Canon Pixma TS3340

Пользовались Canon Pixma TS3340?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор

Оставить свой отзыв

3723

1589

627

488

949

Эксопилот-6ISDQ

08.03.2013

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

I purchased this printer because i was specifically looking for a bottom loader as i hate having paper sticking out the back all the time but instead of having the paper out of sight as hoped, instead of paper sticking out the back it's now sticking out the front! As this wasn't shown in any of the pictures i presumed the paper would be in a draw at the bottom and out of sight but sadly not.

Installation is very long winded...press this button, press that button, wait 20 seconds and press this button just to setup the wireless. The instructions is just as long winded and could have easily been condensed. Once installed it seems to do it's job well enough although it's VERY slow, the slowest printer i've ever owned and if you create a document that contains images and text it seems to have a mind of it's own, printing only the image! The only solution i've found to this is to save the document, close it and then re-open it for it to print the entire document. I also created a leaflet, setting up the page in MS Word, formatting the page to have 2 leaflets next to each other and when i tried to print it the printer chose to only print 1 of the images, ignoring the second one right next to it! Again the only solution was to close and re-open the document for the printer to print the entire document instead of what it seems to be choosing to print! I haven't tested copying or scanning yet as i'll probably have to take the afternoon off just to follow the instructions lol.

After 2 months of ownership it decided to start chewing up paper when printing a multi page document so i had enough and returned it to Amazon. Amazon as always provided excellent customer service, giving me a full no quible refund. I was almost glad that it started chewing up paper so i could get rid of the damn thing and go back to Epson!

All in all this has to be the worst printer i've ever owned! From the rediculously long winded setup and installation to it seemingly having it's own mind over what it chooses to print. There are many printers in the same price range and even cheaper that do a much better job.No complaints with Amazon though...delivered quickly using their free delivery option and refunding my purchase price when it started chewing up paper. Thank you Amazon for your excellent customer service!

источник

Фотон-1PTHU

06.11.2014

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

The ink is slightly runny and light but its good value for money. Good for everyday printing. Esp when you have kids who want to print off random bits of stuff !! Its been a month since we started using so cant comment on the throughput yet.

источник

Гиперион-9LDHE

02.06.2014

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

I have had 2 of these little monsters and the second one has just outstayed it's welcome.

Interesting to see most of the 5 star reviews are recent purchases, where the reviewer hasn't given the Pixma MG3250 a chance to start ruining page after page of expensive business card stock, or waited all evening for it to come to some sort of decision about printing the first page of something - or not.

Well, mine has just wasted it's last page. It just started giving me a '7' and a '1' error, which usually I would go some way toward solving but having gone through this process unsuccessfully with Pixma number one I thought I'd save myself some life and just feed it back to PC World.

Thankfully I got insurance on this thing so I get my

источник

Супернова-9WOPH

15.05.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I purchased this printer to replace a 12-year-old HP DeskJet 930 (I'm pretty easy on my stuff, so it tends to last a long time). I did quite a bit of research before buying, and am very happy so far with the printer. It prints well, scanning is a snap, and it's very handy now having a fax at home, since I have a number of document recipients who prefer fax to email.I really like being able to fax without actually printing a document out -- the fax function shows up as an available printer, so to send a document, whether pdf or Word or Excel or PowerPoint, all you have to do is click the print button and select the Canon fax as the destination printer. A window pops up asking for the phone number. Enter the phone number from the computer keyboard, hit "enter" and ZIP -- the printer dials and faxes the document directly from the computer file with no intervening paper copy. Paperless faxing is VERY handy!The automatic duplex is also handy but very slow -- it prints one side, then sucks the page back in to print the other side.It appears to be a bit more frugal with ink than the old DeskJet it replaced; I've not yet put in new cartridges but the ink indicator says I've used about a quarter of the pigment black and negligible amounts of the dye tanks. With the older printer, I'd have used about half the black and a quarter of the color tank after the same amount of time -- and with this printer, I can change out individual color tanks instead of the entire cartridge when I run out of one color. Ink cartridge costs, both for the black and for the color set, are comparable to OEM for the HP and a little lower for non-OEM. As a rough estimate, it looks like my per-page costs will be about 75% or so of what they were with the DesdJet.I'd read several comments about the footprint, but although the printer is much more massive and bulkier than the DeskJet, the two-dimensional footprint on the desk is virtually the same. The DeskJet had a large base with a fairly small upper body, while the Canon is much more cubic. It therefore seems much bigger and more in the way. Though it doesn't take many more square inches of the desk surface, it consumes many more cubic inches of volume and is easier to bump into.All in all, I'm very happy with the print quality, ease of use, and functionality. I can't address photo printing since I've not done any yet. I don't know if it will last 12 years or even 12 months, but no regrets on the purchase as yet.-----------------------------------ADDENDUM after five months of use: I've now run about 400-500 pages through the printer of Office Depot recycled paper. I've seen some complaints about jamming with inexpensive paper, but the only feed problem I've had is the ONE time the printer took two sheets of paper at once. I had let the supply tray get down to near-empty, and the printer grabbed the last two sheets at the same time. I also now have a handle on ink costs, and I'm VERY happy. My HP InkJet used HP 45 black and 78 cartridges; a set of both ran about $70 OEM and about $50 for off-brands and refills -- and the off-brands and refills had about an 20% failure rate, so they weren't any cheaper than HP name brand cartridges.I just now changed out the black pigment tank and two of the color dye tanks -- using off-brand cartridges I ordered from an online discounter for just over $7 each (about $36 for a full set vs $50 for the HP). They work perfectly with no streaking, spotting, or missed spots. After three weeks of use, I'm using the off-brand no more quickly than I used the Canon brand -- and I got about 50% more pages using the Canon "fast" setting than I did with the HP "draft" setting.Cheaper ink cartridges that print more pages -- I LOVE saving money on ink. It looks so far like my ink costs could be about half what they used to be for the same print volume. It will be nice not to spend as much on ink every year as I did for the printer.My only annoyance is caused by my fairly low print volume. I print 20-30 page jobs about 5 or 6 times per month, with one or two page jobs about twice a week. That means the printer may be in use daily for a few days, but it also means it might sit idle for four or five days at a time. After an extended idle time, the first print job may not start until the machine takes about 3 or 4 minutes to clean the cartridges and do other "internal maintenance." I guess the cure would be to print more often, but it's a very minor and occasional annoyance.So, after six months of use, I'm still very happy with the printer and would definitely purchase again.

источник

НеоВояжер-7QHVM

27.09.2014

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

I purchased this product. It worked briefly with Lightroom 5 although I had to log out of Lightroom after each print before it worked again. Eventually it refused to work with the software and a Japanese error message appeared. I don't know how long this printer had been sitting in the warehouse, but clearly it was not set up to work with Canon plug-in.

источник

Астрономад-3HUWZ

06.12.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I'm very pleased with the prints even at the standard quality and ink consumption seems reasonable so far.

источник

НоваГость-2WXLR

13.09.2013

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I bought this printer from another store, but thought I'd put a review on here. The printer looks really good, and the fact that it hides away all the blank paper is great. I had an IP3000 before that lasted me 9 years, so wanted to get one where the blank paper was hidden, so this fitted the bill perfectly, on top of that the fact that it was a wireless printer was just bonus.
Once unboxed I followed the instructions to connect it by wireless. I have a BT Home Hub 3, it is supposed to be able to connect using WPS, which is a feature available on the Home Hub 3, however I was unable to get the two to communicate with each other. So the next step was to connect using the supplied USB lead and setup CD, however this proved even more frustrating, as the setup guide uses your web browser as the program to run the setup guide, which should not be a problem, except I was using firefox, which caused the setup to stop halfway through, after a few attempts, I installed google chrome, but found that the setup wouldn't even run using this, so next up I downloaded internet explorer 10 which allowed the setup to run correctly so all was good. Now I know most people have some form of internet explorer on their PC, but I did not, and feel that it would have been useful for this to have been stated in the paper setup instructions somewhere.
Now that the printer is all setup, I cannot fault it, just turn it on press print and it does it all for you, even to the extent of opening the front flap!
Overall this is a very good printer, but just make sure that if WPS doesn't work to connect it that you have internet explorer installed.

источник

НоваГость-4OEFF

28.06.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

A little larger in width than previous models. Very easy to unbox and set up. Wireless connection intuitive with good directions.
Quality of print excellent. If it has one fault it would be noise. It is quite noticeable and the printer vibrates a little. In quietude it is much better. The trade off being a little loss in speed of printing. I was able to connect my tower a laptop and my phone in 15 minutes very easy to use..
As this is a slightly older model printing ink can be attained from several sites specialising in remanufacture cartridges. Cost approx 2.50-3 pounds a cartridge. New cartridges from Canon typically 12 pounds each approx.

источник

ИнфраГость-3UYOG

13.09.2014

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

I purchased this printer in November 2012. As I recall, it took a whole afternoon to install it and get it working using a wireless connection. The instructions that came with it only added to the difficulty. I found it noisy, slow, temperamental and able to drain ink cartridges like there's no tomorrow. In September 2014, the printer stopped working. I suppose you could argue that

источник

Спектроник-3OKIC

15.07.2014

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

This my third Pixma printer in 6 years. Wireless setup was fairly easy and print quality for text and photos is excellant. The main drawback for me is the paper handling which is not as versatile as my last printer, an iP4950, in that the same cassette is used for envelopes and A4 paper. Envelope size choice is limited to DL and US Commercial #10. A4 paper has to be removed before envelopes can be installed which makes printing letters a cumbersome process. I hope the printer lasts longer than my iP4950, which failed suddenly with Error200 after less than 2 years.

источник

Вектрон-9QNFS

21.10.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I should use this printer a little more before trying to give accurate feedback but I researched all the "stand-alone" printers (when I buy a refrigerator I don't want a microwave oven attached) up to

источник

Пульсар-3EPYV

11.11.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Have only just set it up. Essentially it our back up printer, but with scanner and photo copier as well. Colour reproduction very good.

источник

Эксопилот-8NTIC

12.05.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I was very worried when I read the negative reviews on this printer. However as I wanted an inkjet printer only, and preferred Canon products, I took a risk and purchased this printer. Set-up was a doddle, so do not understand the negative reviews. I was not keen on the bottom paper tray but have had no issues. The print quality is superb on both paper and CD.

I note that there are lots of negative comments about the amount of ink used and the time to start printing. This is true but ...... only because the default setting is to power off after 240 minutes. When you power on, the printer goes through its head cleaning routine which takes time and ink. Set the 'auto-power off' to disable and the printer works both speedily and uses much less ink.

источник

Плазмонавт-4BMEB

24.03.2013

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

I've had this printer for about a year now, purchased it new and have never liked it. It had been difficult for me to set-up Wi-Fi printing. It worked for a day then quit, ended-up using the USB cable after too much frustration. I finally got Wi-Fi printing to work about a month ago. In my opinion? This printer blows, the worst I've had yet. It makes all sorts of noises and adjustments when you first power the unit up. Then after you wait and wait it finally prints while you wondered if it would. Mine had been indicating low black ink recently for three weeks. It had printed more than a dozen documents during that time without an issue. I had let it go just to see how long it would print. You know how they exaggerate printer ink being low? I wanted to get a feel for the printer. Big mistake! Today the black ink didn't run out or fade, it POURED out, started smudging envelopes very badly! Is this what happens when we don't replace printer head cartridges when they run low? I hope not. I tried using the software first to clean the printer heads thinking o.k. maybe the printer head is just a bit dirty. I had tried using the Cleaning app within the software, then the Deep Cleaning app, Bottom Plate Cleaning, Roller Cleaning, almost thinking the printer could wipe my butt with all that software. The cleaning apps didn't do squat! All the sheets of paper required by the software for cleaning and alignment came out sparkling clean, but when I tried printing an envelope what a mess! When I pulled out the black ink cartridge it was a mess as well as the printer itself. Why on earth do they think printers can actually clean their own printer heads? They're good at peeing ink on themselves though... I cleaned it best I could with Q-tips and alcohol without touching the printer head. Then I had to waste five or six envelopes before finally getting one that was decent with minimal smudging. I guess I'm going to be purchasing a new black ink printer cartridge soon. But when the day comes for me to get rid of this printer I'll be making my first video review, a simple one showing the printer looking like the Big Bang theory creating the universe.

источник

Вояджер-4DIBK

21.09.2014

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Serious piece of junk! Paper feed is very hit and miss which wouldn't be so bad if one didn't have to sit through 10-15 minutes of interminable and noisy head cleaning before failing to print! Better not to leave printing boarding passes until the last minute - the flight will probably have gone!

источник

Кварковец-8HGQA

29.07.2014

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

We bought this printer to enable us to print from an iPad. Unfortunately it was a "Friday afternoon" machine and had many faults. It "clunked" loudly when switched on, the paper tray cover wouldn't stay up and there was a permanent error message. As it had good reviews we returned it and re-ordered another, which arrived within a week. The second one was easy to install and printed photos clearly. Despite the problems we had at first I would still recommend it.

источник

Астероид-6UYJY

14.10.2014

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

I bought this to replace my iP4700 that blew up (well the ink carriage flew to the left, went crash and jammed tightly. Then I think the power unit gave up). The 7250 seemed to be the modern equivalent and at

источник

МехаРейнджер-2DRPN

02.11.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Very pleased with it print out of photos is very good compared with other printers I have brought and still have I rate it the best I have

источник

ИнфраГость-5WLVG

13.06.2014

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

The printer was a replacement for a Pixma iP4600, which gave me a number of years' sterling service. The 7250 prints as well as its predecessor, so I can't in fairness score it lower than a 3. The problem came when I tried to fit standard A4 photo paper into the top paper cassette, which is ostensibly designed for photo paper. It doesn't fit. Seems you're not expected to print above 5 x 7. Yes, you can print A4 photos, but only by removing the standard paper in the lower cartridge and replacing it with the photo paper. A small thing, you might think, but I can see this becoming more than a little irksome over the years.

источник

Синтрон-4NOEV

06.11.2014

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Excellent - a step forward compared to my old iP4200 in every way. If it's footprint was smaller I'd give it 5 stars.

источник

Странник-7KOCD

29.10.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Very pleased with it. Prints photos well and cd's without any problem. I particularly like the automatic duplex feature; saves no end of time.

источник

НаноПилигрим-6DGUS

19.05.2014

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I use a laser for all mono printing. I have restricted colour to the minimum because of the cost, however this Canon is certainly much much more economical than other makes that I have had. It is also cheaper than other brands that I have had in the past. I was concerned about the colours all being in one cartridge but now prefer it, having changed one colour on the old machines only to have to replace another within hours.
Why mark it down a star? I'm not so happy with the scanning. I have been spoilt with an old Canon LIDE stand alone scanner bought from Amazon years ago for a song, and I've yet to find anything that performs better. One of the cheapest Inks and also lasts longer.

источник

НаноРейдер-9EUDD

23.02.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Had to buy replacement for my old HP 5460, which started to play up switching on. I had a Canon printer years ago, but was disappointed with it. However this has some good reviews and at present it lives up to them. Dead easy to set up on wireless, and drivers update automatically on Windows 7.
Have only used it a few times, mainly for documents, but I have tried it to print a couple of Photos. All look good to date. The only thing that seems to be a pain is it can take a while for some items to print. The printer goes through some test routines before it actually prints. The other thing that you need to be careful of is getting items stuck in the print spooler. As a wireless printer you can have it set up on a number of machines, If you send something make sure it comes out, other wise you may end up seeing a message printer waiting for print to finish, and have no idea which machine it came from, so you have to check them all and try to cancel. Just a word of warning.

источник

Альфа-Юнит-9TCWU

15.12.2013

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

Recieved yesterday after owning a canon ip3000 and canon ip4200

I bought this mainly for disk printing which it does well but its a bit of messing around compared to the two models ive mentioned before, every time i try to print a disk i get a error to close the disk tray, then have to press the resume buttong, then open the disk tray insert the dvd / cd tray and press resume again, this happens every time i print a disk, maybe i have a fault but seems unlikely

Paper loading tray to me seems silly, should of stuck to the old tried and tested method of feeding the paper in at the top , pointless feature, just makes it more awkward and the printer is bigger as a result of this, also get errors with printing paper and have to mess around with the resume button

The wifi ive not tried but im not holding out much hope of being able to print pictures from my phone when pretty much every print ive tried i have to be by the printers side pressing buttons

Not all negative though, it does print great quality prints pretty quick, seems much quicker then my last couple of printers and the prints are worthy of hanging on the wall, no doubt about that, disk prints are equally as good

источник

Квантум-2BQLN

07.04.2013

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I have always bought different types of printers, lexmarks all in ones (2) , Kodak photo printers (2), HP's one photo, one regular. They have always have just not lived up to my standards of what a " decent" printer should be. In terms of quality printing, speed, ink usage, No jams or paper problems, breakdowns, reproduction of photos that actually look like what I have on my monitor. All other printers have all failed. On getting them I realize that the photo options don't live up to what they should be, or the printers are headache machines.This printer...This Pixma Pro-100. Is not any of that. It is a glorious image reproducing BEAST. It makes photos look like pure art. If you enjoy reproducing high quality images that simply blow the mind away then this is the printer for you.I printed 3 test sheets of certain images some black and white , some high color environments and one with various skin tones. I printed 3 with this machine and then had the same images printed by different places. ( walmart, rite aid, snapfish, shutterfly and Walgreens ). The same photos from this printer killed the ones produced by walmart, rite aid, Walgreens and snapfish. Shutterfly's black and white on was on par with the same one I printed on this printer. But the color ones were up a notch.I will say I have only purchased canon quality paper for this printer so I can't speak on other paper types. But paired with canon paper it just gets ridiculous in terms of image quality. From 4x6 to 5x7 to 8x10 are prefect. And the 13x19 prints are gorgeous.A few things. One my biggest concern about this printer was if it was an ink devoring monster. After printing about 50 large prints so far. Just now my yellow and grey inks show being 2/3 full. It got to the point I was wondering if the thing was actually using ink. It does but at an acceptable rate IMO. Also make sure you click off the double profiles button otherwise your images will seem fogged up.JUST BUY THE PRINTER BUY IT NOW. And watch your photos go from boring regular any day any place produced photos to become ART pieces.

источник

Квантум-5XNYK

04.06.2012

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

...that I managed to pay only $16 for it. I happened to stop into a local Staples in November 2010 which featured this model on clearance for %90 off. For $16, I figured that it was well worth the risk and that I could make any adjustments over the course of its use. My 'printing profile' would be best described as someone who employs printing primarily for sporadic, utilitarian functions. I generally do not print photos or graphics but the very occasional document or coupon that requires a 'hard copy'.Some observations I have made in regards to this device over the 18 month period I have owned it:The design aesthetic seems nice enough - though the form factor of this All-In-One is somewhat bigger, bulkier, and heavier than others in its category. I was surprised with how heavy it is... It seems to weigh as much as some laser printers. This factor seems to be attributed to it having its power brick integrated inside the machine itself. Just my observation.The LCD menu is easy enough for me to use - but I am very 'savvy' with electronics (I work in IT) and I have heard some feedback from others that they have found it to be somewhat counter-intuitive and cumbersome. There is room for improvement in this area.Printing and scanning functions are average and unexceptional from my point of reference.The memory card port is useful though to be truthful, I haven't really utilized it.The bundled software package seems a bit excessive but you can customize the installation process if you so choose.As for the wireless aspect of it, I never engaged it so I cannot comment on that.BUT... The most glaring factor I have encountered with this device is that it consumes ink extravagantly. I was quite surprised to find that even with my 'miserly' printing habits, this thing was advising me that my color cartridges were practically depleted as was the black cartridge. Of any printer I have ever owned, I have never seen such a rapid exhaustion of printer ink. And the replacement costs were a bit exorbitant. My previous HP 1210 All-In One was a workhorse and under the same usage conditions, would still have a nice store of ink and the ink itself was more cost effective to replace. And with that unit, I noticed that even after long periods of dormancy the ink was still usable and did not dry out (which was NOT the case with my experiences using Lexmark printers - but that's another subject for another review).After due consideration, I have decided to 'retire' the MP 560 and donate it to my workplace for use as only a dedicated scanner. Contrary to some of the other reviews I have read about this unit being completely non-functional if the ink carts are empty, it DOES works independently as a scanner from my experience. It may have something to do with installing only the driver and Navigator software. I am not completely certain about this however - but personally, I have managed to get the MP 560 working as a standalone scanner successfully.If ink costs are not an issue for you, or you're willing to look for a cheaper 3rd party option, then the MP 560 might satisfy your needs. But there are better options elsewhere.

источник

Небулоид-9RQEM

14.10.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I purchased this for the direct disc printing ability. Very happy with it. Good on ink and very easy to set up too. Also, the seller deserves 5 stars too. Very happy with it.

источник

Капеллан-1JRUB

24.08.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Excellent. Arrived on time, and used in my Cannon Pixma no, mess, no fuss, just good, clear easy printing. Great for colour printing. Equally, printing text was a breeze as it was sharp and almost like canon - no smudges. Very good and goes a long way.
Will definitely be using again and recommend the sellers. Good service great product.

источник

Зета-Орион-9OKBO

09.09.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Very good for this price.I bought the printer because of the Wi-Fi system.Now i can print anything directly from my smart phone or from my tablet.You need just to install from the Play Store the app which is the best working for me;Canon EPP with a green picture.
Thank you.

источник

НаноРейдер-3UTXE

12.02.2014

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

Generally the print quality is extremely good - and that's why you buy a printer for, but this particular model has a couple of issues. The first being that it has two paper trays. One for standard paper for the day to day printing of documents and the other you put photo quality paper in. What's wrong with that you might think? It sounds like a good thing to do. The problem is the photo paper tray will only accept paper up to 7x5 size. Surely it would have been better if this tray could accept photo paper up to A4 size too...? It seems ludicrous that it can't.

The second issue that I have with this printer is the spooling time after you have switched the printer on. It can often take a minute or three whirring and clicking away before it actually gets around to printing anything out. Not exactly great if you need to print something out in a hurry.

Furthermore, it does seem quite big for an A4 printer. Its wider and deeper than my previous Canon iP4850 printer.

источник

Гелиос-9NTSO

22.10.2014

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Bought as a replacement for an i965. Gives good prints, though, as ever, keeping to original Canon ink is very expensive.

источник

Пандорец-4HORK

30.08.2014

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

I purchased this Cartridge SET as it was advertised thinking it was the full set........It isn't!!!!! My printer is a Canon MG6350, consequently the SET is missing the cartridge CLI-551 <GY>. The other cartridges were fine but this cartridge missing from the set was really annoying.

источник

Фотон-5KWNV

15.10.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Good price, arrived promptly from "Allday supplies". Too early to say how long the ink will last but so far so good.

источник

Пульсар-2TZXY

14.09.2014

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

Absolute rubbish. I stupidly bought a second thinking that they would have improved. On both the ink nozzles blocked irreparably and getting the machine fixed was going to cost as much as a new one. I strongly recommend avoiding.

источник

МехаРейнджер-4WBUI

08.10.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

'Quality, Quality, Quality!'.......to get the best out of this great machine - use good photo paper and you will be VERY PLEASED with the results.

источник

Зета-Орион-9NEJS

06.02.2013

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

As a non-techy person, I always approach a new piece of kit with a mix of anticipation and trepidation, for fear it might all be too complicated to set up. This was pretty good though.

It came well packaged and protected and was easy to unpack. The quick-start guide was pretty easy to follow and told me everything I needed to do step-by-step - at least until it got to the WiFi set-up when it unfortunately lapsed into incomprehensible jargonese, burbling on about WPS buttons and LANs. However it said if my system couldn't do this I should leap forward to another section. No idea whether my system could do it, but I certainly couldn't. So I leapt ahead as suggested and it talked me through how to connect to WiFi using a USB cable which was supplied. This worked fine.

All set to go...then error message saying wrong type of printer cartridge installed. Since what was installed was what they'd provided this seemed unlikely, so I took it out and stuck it in again and on the third attempt it worked. Don't know if that will be a recurring problem when I try to change the cartridge in future.

So the set-up was complete in about 25 minutes. The print quality is fine and it's fast enough for my low-usage purposes. It is a bit noisy - not a problem if it's only going to be used occasionally, but might be annoying in heavy use. Both scanning and photocopying work fine, though the colours are truer when using copy rather than scan and print - and in neither case are they completely true. Scanning takes a lo-o-ong time but copying is very quick. I have put the printer upstairs from both router and computer and the WiFi works fine at that range. The installed software automatically attaches itself to the start-up menu and is annoying if you don't need to be printing all the time, since it puts a big option panel on the desktop; but it gives the option to stop the auto-start from happening if you prefer.

Overall, so far, so good. It's pretty basic but for the low-quantity user who doesn't need particularly high quality scanning, it's easy to operate and does the job. For info, I'm using it with Windows 7 and a Virgin Media router. I will update the review should there be any problems.

источник

Гравитон-6MXDP

15.10.2014

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Okay for someone who does not print that much. I just need it in some situations such when I am too lazy to print in uni.

источник

Сириус-4QWRQ

12.08.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I love this Canon printer. I had a Canon printer before this one and I loved it so much and used it every day. I have printed whole books on it. I print cards and letters - almost everything. The print is always so clear and crisp and photos are really professional looking. I do recommend this printer. I have hours of enjoyment with it.

источник

НоваГость-0ECWZ

16.10.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Easy set up and worked first time. Some parts quite plasticy, but I guess being made of plastic what do I expect!!!

источник

Синтрон-1RBPP

20.08.2012

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I have 3 SLR cameras (canon film, canon t2i, sony alpha) and tend to print most of my prints at home after I got the Canon Pixma Pro Mark II in 2011 - which is a predecessor of this printer. After I obtained the Pixma Pro-1, i have never looked at ordering prints, choosing to print all my prints on my Pro-1.The advantages of printing pro quality pictures at your home is not really that of cost - infact it might be more expensive to print at home, but the advantage is the ability to control the image settings and print it exactly as you wish. Not to mention all the fun you can have by printing your own photo books, Calendars with your kids as well as making business prints for a presentation.The fun is endless, as long as you like photography, trust me, a printer like this is necessary.Print Quality=============If you see an image shot on you SLR on your laptop, LCD/LED screen - they all look different depending on which display you see it, but when you print it on a Pro-1 - it is truly a real representation of the real precise colors of nature stored in depth of each of the pixel on the image. The quality of the images even on a 11x14 print is just not comparable to any print.Compared to the Pixma Pro-1 and Pixma Pro Mark II 9000 - both are very good, but Pixma Pro-1 clearly shows a greater depth and diversity of colors in detailed nature shots.Cartridge=========Now, coming to the Pro series printers from canon - this is not your level 1/level 2 printers that contain B/W & color or 3 different color cartridges. Pixma Pro 1 comes with 12 Individual cartridges Pixma Pro Mark II 9000 contains 8 individual cartridgesThe number of cartridges will help in producing the most precise color on your prints. In each print dialog, it displays the quantity of the ink remaining in each cartridge, the cost is pretty expensive about 350 for 12 pack, 120 for 6 pack and 35 for individual cartridge.Print size===========Both Pixma Pro-1 and Pixma Pro 9000 Mark II support similar sizes upto 13" x 19"Ink precision==============The ink delivery from the ink cartridges comes in as tiny droplets sprayed in precision, the smaller the size of the drop, the more precise is the print. Pixma Pro 1 is 4 picoliters and Pixma Pro Mark II 9000 is 2 picoliters. Pixma Pro Mark II 9000 is a clear winner on this, but the larger droplet size will allow the Pro-1 to print faster.In summary :If you are a hobbyist like me - a Canon Pixma Pro Mark II 9000 is a decent printer to play with - this is good to print all your calendars, posters for your small business ...If you are a professional either sells photographs as a profession or someone who shoots nature photography as a hobby, you should go for a Canon Pro-1. The quality and dept of colors will make a huge difference and impact on your customers perception.

источник

Астрономад-3GOPK

15.10.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

What can you say? Canon Pixma. Excellent printer, but more important nice company to do business with . Thank you.

источник

Аэронавт-4YXUI

02.10.2014

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Another very good Canon printer, though their "My Image Garden" is not so user friendly as previous systems. The replacement inks are extortionate.

источник

Интеллектор-6AXSG

07.10.2014

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Set up was easy, and automatic start is great. It does take a while to go through its startup routine but once warmed up it is very quick.

источник

Вояджер-9MDON

06.10.2014

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

The printer goes offline without any reason. No point in buying an air printer if it does not function as one

Fine when it works

источник

Кронос-9TNDK

05.04.2014

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Received this sooner than expected which is good
Connecting to wi fi as per instructions in the quick start guide didn't work however if you load the supplied cd rom into your cd drive once you've downloaded the software ,drivers etc there's a set up menu connect the printer to the computer with the usb lead supplied go through the on screen instructions and your done,your connected ,remove usb lead for wireless printing .
A quick note my wife has got a laptop with no cd drive ,so I opened up the cd menu copied everything onto an sd card ( took about 15mins)
Put the sd card into my wife's computer opened opened up sd card menu clicked on setup and everything installed as per the cd
Ps make sure your connected to the internet.

источник

Кварковец-4AKEO

08.04.2014

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Wouldn't buy it for regular printing purposes. Bought it to brand our DVD's with our small company logo. Easy enough instructions but every time I use it the first two to three DVD's come out smudged or stick. After that they come out fine so I would recommend that you do as many as you can in one batch. I have done about 4 batches now and it is the same each time.

Pricey for ink so have used to have it as a back up. It's now my main printer as my old Brother Printer died on me and it makes me flinch to buy the inks! Will need to buy another for normal document printing.

I usually always look to see the price of replacement inks before I buy the printer. Initial low price on the shelf isn't always a good deal!

источник

Гиперион-9QNVY

05.07.2014

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

Sounds horrendous when starting up and printing and therefore no surprise that it's developed a serious fault after only a few months light use. Fails to recognize that there's paper in the tray and needs numerous restarts, reloads, roller cleans before printing maybe one or two sheets.......then fails to recognize that there's paper in the tray. Life really is too short for this sort of nonsense. Goodbye printer and goodbye Canon.

источник

Альфа-Юнит-5ZDKE

02.07.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I usually find things I don't like when I buy something but this printer really impressed me! Although I bought it from Argos (as I really needed RIGHT NOW).

I've done a small test ordering 5 prints to be printed in a studio and printed same 5 with my iP7259. Studio prints disappointed me with the lack of saturation compared to my own prints.

Yes, housekeeping probably takes a minute but damn! The quality is amazing!

источник

Показаны отзывы 2361-2408 из 7376.