Отзывы о Мфу Canon Pixma TS3340

7376 отзывов пользователей о Canon Pixma TS3340

НаноПилигрим-9RNYW

31.12.2014

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

When my HP photo printer finally died of old age it was replaced by the Canon PIXMA iP7250, purchased mainly because of its CD/DVD printing facility. Fortunately I paid a modest price for it, which makes it much easier to chuck the thing out. Just finding out how to print on CDs took half a lifetime and eventually I worked it out largely by trial and error. The Online User Manual (which I hate) and the Image Garden Software are next to useless at showing and describing how to carry out specific tasks. In my humble opinion, the worst people to write instruction manuals are the experienced technicians and software writers who developed the product! As mentioned in other reviews the print quality is good when printing both images and text. Paper handling is straightforward and reliable.
The startup-routine is as noisy as it is lengthy, and I wonder how much ink is being used to clean and prime the printheads. The connectivity is good and I have had no problems with the wi-fi connection. However, although this is my first Canon printer it will certainly be my last.

источник

Фотон-7KSEY

19.01.2015

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Bought the PIXMA iP7250 as my PIXMA iP4300 printer suddenly decided not to switch on after 7.5 years of light occasional use.

The iP7250 looks wider and deeper than the iP4300, on checking the specs:
iP7250 (W x D x H) 451 x 368 x 128mm
iP4300 (W x D x H) 445 x 303 x 160mm

As others have stated the iP7250 gets its paper from one of two trays (so not a top feeder like the PIXMA iP7250). This caused me some issues as the only paper tray that accepts A4 paper is the bottom one, and it kept catching on the table cloth (on which the printer sat) when I tried to remove the cassette. So no more table cloth!

I connected the printer using a USB cable and downloaded just the printer driver from the Canon website. Printer comes with a USB cable approx. 1.4 metres.

As usual which Canon printers, printer makes a lot of whirring, wheezing and banging before it does any printing. Once printing it is quiet in operation and produces good quality results.

источник

Гелиос-3TACM

07.01.2015

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

Replaced a well used iP4200 which was fantastic for many many years.

Went with Canon due to the fact the last one was so good.

It prints good quality papers and photos - just like the model 7 years before.

But - unlike the model of over 7 years old
The iP7250 is slow to start up - really slow, like 2 minutes slow - every time.
Its very very noisy - its so noisy it sounds broken and unhealthy - but its not.

Like a few other reviews - on Windows 7 I've had issues with the computer being unable to communicate with computer. Printer seems to be put into pause mode under device manager - no idea why.

WIFI seems to work ok. Wifi access point is in the same room, so signal is no issue. Relatively simple to set up.

I've had a few photos where the ink came out smudged on on top corner using 6x4 canon glossy paper.

Personally, I would not recommend this printer. I've no idea what else to recommend but this is not that good.

источник

Пульсар-7HMLK

29.11.2012

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

In this day and age where the value of an item is measured by how many bells and whistles a manufacturer can pack into a product, it's refreshing to have discovered something I will use every day that isn't decked out in the latest features or trimmings. I am, of course, referring to Canon's Pixma iX6520. What it lacks in gongs and clappers (wireless, Ethernet, LCD screen, etc...), it more than makes up for in RESULTS.And if you are a photographer or graphic designer, and need to print accurate color proofs or contact sheets, this printer will fit the bill nicely without breaking the bank. Having had it for about a week, this is what I've learned about it so far:PROS:* Connects via USB to my Apple AirPort Express Base Station (MC414LL/A) so I can print to it from any room or computer in the house (should work with other wireless routers with USB ports). It does not work with Airprint, so if you want to print from your iPad or iPhone, this won't work. You can download and use handyprint, which will allow you to print to it from an iPad but handyprint has to be running on another computer and it isn't free.* Having owned an Epson Stylus Photo 2200 Ink Jet Printer (C11C387011), the big dog in its time, I grew weary of the expensive cartridges, e.g., Epson Inkjet Cartridge (Light Cyan) (T034520) (8 in total!), constant cleaning, and frankly, poor results for such slow printing.* The Canon Pixma iX6520 Inkjet Printer (4895B002) is fast in both color, and black and white, at the default settings. So good in fact, that you can print to glossy or semi-gloss photo paper and frame it. Yes, it's that good. And that's not even using the higher print settings (slower, but better quality).* The inks at the Canon store (get them there as they always throw in a package of glossy paper) are about $39 to replace them all. The Epson Stylus Photo 2200 Ink Jet Printer (C11C387011)'s are about $15 a piece.* I've printed a number of photos already and the cartridges are still full (the Epson's would be at the 3/4 mark about now).* It has a quiet mode in the settings that will put it to sleep at night to save you money on your electric bill.CONS:* Make no mistake, this is a great printing system surrounded by a lot of plastic. The second day I had it the cover in the front fell off. Took me an hour to put it back in properly as it won't print without it on. Kept getting an error message saying cover was closed. Actually it was lying on the carpet. Argh. If it happens again I'll be returning it for a new one. That is unacceptable.* After installing the drivers, turning the printer on during the process, Canon's software does NOT add the printer to your Print & Scan system preferences. You have to do that manually. Of course, Apple found it immediately and notified me that it had newer drivers I could download. Here's my advice: Unwrap it, install it, plug it in, go into System Preferences > Print & Scan, click the plus sign, and let Apple's software do the rest. The CD-ROM installation disc is a clunky affair.In a nutshell, if you're looking for an excellent printer that you can plug into your computer or wireless router via USB, this is the one. To say that the prints are spectacular is an understatement. The Canon Pixma iX6520 Inkjet Printer (4895B002) also does border-less printing, 13x19 paper (Super B), and everything in between. If you're looking for auto-duplex and an LCD screen and slots for memory cards, you'll need to look elsewhere. As for me, I found the perfect printer that's a little rough around the edges but with a clean, crisp interior that will leave you quite happy.

источник

Синтрон-1ZXPW

16.01.2015

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Brilliant little machine. I've had printers from Epson and others before and they have been excellent. The trouble with some of them was that the ink would dry in the heads if they are not used frequently, leading to time and ink wastage cleaning the heads.
Finally I grew exasperated and tried a small Canon printer, primarily because, as a photographer, I wanted to be able to print on CDs. This printer became my daily printer for almost everything and I had no problems until, finally The print head gave out and it would cost more to replace the head than buy a new printer. So I purchased this. This has WiFi bulit in so I can send stuff from my Laptop or Tablet.

I was so impressed that I recommended that a friend get a Canon printer as well. She wanted one that included a scanner so went for the CANON PIXMA MG5550 All-in-One Wireless Inkjet Printer and is equally satisfied with it.

источник

Дроид-7PLCH

30.12.2014

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

An excellent printer with excellent photo printing, which would be expected with the DPI this printer has.

Set-up was not as easy as expected, which is why it's only 4/5. The WPS (automatic Wifi connection) failed to work several times with my Virgin 100MB broadband router. I have to put the CD in and run through the set-up with the CD - it does need a USB cable for a CD set-up but this comes with the printer.

The printer has two paper trays. One for A4 (The bottom one) and the top one for smaller sizes. When using AirPrint with Apple products to print photos the AirPrint defaults to the smaller tray and prints directly onto smaller photo paper very well. The only down side is that to print to the A4 paper tray you have to download the Canon Pixma App and print through that.

A neat little unit and apart from the slow ish initial set-up and the non-ability to print on A4 using AirPrint it's a very good printer.

источник

ОмниКод-3QYCA

20.02.2015

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

My Canon Pixma printer was showing signs of wear and so after some years of excellent service I bit the bullet and replaced it. Why this one ?
I did something I have never done before....I asked Canon to recommend a model to replace my old one, explaining fully to Canon exactly what I used my printer for....strictly Photographic use. This model was recommended by Canon. It was straightforward to install. ususally there is something that snags, however minor, but this wet as smooth and as easy as one would wish. The pictures produced are first class, There are times when I do miss the old Wet film and print system ( old smokers occasionally miss their pipes! ) but digital photography is a doddle and this printer puts the snap into doddle absolutey. Recommended.

источник

Сатурниан-5PPXI

04.03.2015

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Does the job. Very high quality photographic prints. Decent speed whether text or photo / graphics. Underside paper tray looks like an afterthought but in fact works fine and means the printer needs very little headroom. Warnings not to put stuff in front of the printer are a bit overdone - with the output cover open there's about 40mm vertical clearance. Looks very neat, in gloss and matt black. Not info yet on how long the inks last. Dreadfully slow to warm up - time from hitting "print" to print commencing is at least 30 sec and accompanied with alarming clanking and whirring sounds. Which is the only thing I don't like about it. So far. Let's see how the inks do.

источник

Квантум-7GXXK

06.02.2015

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Printer was very good for printing normal day to day documents and exceptionally good for photos. Alas thats where the praise ends. The model i had IP7250 was supposed to be able to print onto disc media but the software as supplied made this impossible, due to how hard it was to use and to a fault on the printer. Contacting Canon met with mixed results, they suggested i used software from an older model which seemed strange. Tried it and to be honest it was no better a little easier to use but not by much. In the end sent it back as not as advertised. Personally i think Canon should look at Epson software for printing disc media, it is so easy to use and gives great results. Only other gripe with the Canon was its hunger for Ink, it sure was thirsty.

источник

Нейрон-3GHMW

31.10.2013

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

Below is my original review but this is the update - after a promising start I've now given up with this machine even though I've not had it long. First few documents went through it fine and, although the print quality was pretty basic, the duplexing facility was a real boon. Then there was a paper jam; the feed had just grabbed a load of paper and munched it. After removing the paper the print heads seemed to be misaligned so I reset them but the print never really recovered. Now the feed just randomly grabs paper and lets the machine chew it all by itself for random amusement and the print is often unreadable. A sad end after a promising start.

***

Here is a very useful all-round machine - someone thought about this when they put a duplex capability in such a budget piece of equipment. And yes, it works - indeed, as I write it's producing 30 double-sided words and notice sheets for church on Sunday without the hassle of trying to remember which way to feed the paper back in after printing on one side. Full marks for the duplex!

But the ship has been spoiled for a ha'p'orth of tar - or the accountants got hold of it, more to the point.
There's no proper screen so setting-up some functions such as wifi relies on waiting for various lights to flash rather than having a clear message.
Photocopying is fine in both black and white and colour but there's no zoom capability.
The colour cartridge is just that - singular - meaning use too much yellow and you need to replace the unused magenta and cyan at the same time which is a bit of a waste.
Setting up the machine to work with the computer was not as straightforward as I would have hoped; Windows didn't recognise it but, strangely, would scan into a document while refusing to print. On second attempt it installed correctly but the accompanying software is somewhat over the top for such a basic piece of equipment. For Linux I had to search the support site for drivers (why not supplied on the disk?) but these installed well and printing - including duplexing - works fine. For scanning the software works, but with fewer functions than its Windows brother, but Canon have forgotten that Linux is mainstream these days and only supply scanning software which launches as a CLI from Terminal. Once launched, however, it works OK.

источник

Гравитон-3AVON

15.02.2015

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Bought this to replace an older Canon (iP4500) that had failed after 6 years of reliable service.
Very happy that it does the same stuff - photo printing, duplex, CD print, two separate paper sources for different media.
Added bonus of wireless printing so all the PCs and laptops in my house can now print via the network.
If there is a downside, it takes a while to get started with the first print after turning on (though not the 5 minutes some buyers have reported.
My old CD printing software from the previous printer still works with this one which is a bonus.
Bought this for the same price from eBuyer - delivery was a bit longer but I prefer to use them as the PAY THEIR TAX!

источник

Плазмонавт-1OXLH

12.01.2015

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

Don't buy this seriously - as others had said...it doesn't seem to like picking up the paper, so I would have to give it a little nudge in so it would feed...
Then the jams started - at first they were easy to solve, flip the back and pull out. But then it go stuck under the ink cartridges and wouldn't come out, so I swapped printers with my dad (it is also an mg3250 printer) so he could try and fix the first one. I haven't had my dad's one for a week and it's already jammed beyond pulling it out.

As a uni student this now means that I have to pay for a bus ticket to the other side of town and then pay to print my work out, luckily my subject doesn't require it but I print my notes out as my handwriting is horrible in a rush and also some of my assignements also need to be printed out!

источник

Гелиос-3GMAL

16.12.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I bought this for my Mum to use, after her old printer stopped. After getting used to it, it is daily use for letters & pictures. It makes excellent photo prints & the text quality is good too. I set it up for wireless use (use the supplied USB lead & follow the on screen instruction for the initial set-up). The two paper drawers - one for A4/A5, one for 6x4 photo paper - make it easy to switch between different operations. It also prints envelopes without any problem. The out-feed cover opens automatically, which is useful if you sometimes forget to open it. Print speed is good & (contrary to other reviews) it is not too thirsty for ink (although Canon inks ARE expensive). It is very black inside, making it difficult to see the paper size markings - although a little white correction fluid helps to make things clearer. All in all an excellent printer & great value for money.

источник

Зета-Орион-3FMEO

15.01.2015

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

It's early days yet but so far I am thrilled with this printer which I bought to replace my (now kaput) Epson Stylus Photo 2100 which drank ink and forever had blocked nozzles. I am using a Mac with OSX 10.9 Mavericks.

Setup was very easy using the CD enclosed. A few words of advice though - choose the USB connection option at first then follow the instructions exactly and you'll be fine - you can customise it and connect it by Ethernet or Wireless later! Also, make sure you get someone to help you unpack it and lift it into position as it is very heavy.

Printing is very good quality, fast and quiet using Photoshop CS6, Indesign CS6 and Adobe Acrobat Pro X. I have ordered some special papers for it and will write up how it performs with those a little later.

источник

Туманник-2DOYQ

21.08.2014

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

Deeply disappointed with this printer. I expected an improvement over the Pixma ip4500, my previous printer, but it's worse on just about every level:

1) Photo quality: significantly worse. I'm using genuine Canon inks but the colours are washed out every time. I have to artificially boost black levels or contrast on Photoshop or in the print menu to get satisfactory results.
2) Paper feed mechanism: rubbish. Printer consistently fails to detect the last sheet of paper. This failure applies to both photo paper and standard paper in BOTH trays. I often have to open up the trays and re-position the paper to get it working. Even more seriously, the feed mechanism does not support thicker photo paper from the likes of Hahnemuhle. The lack of a manual feed option means it's impossible to print on more adventurous photo paper. A terrible retrograde step considering the ip4500 could handle this.
3) Very noisy. Much noisier than the ip4500.

When my ip4500 packed up, I deliberately chose to buy another dedicated photo printer rather than an all-in-one, figuring it would do one thing very well. Alas the ip7250 does nothing well. I wished I'd spent the same money replacing the printer head on my old Canon. New is not necessarily better.

источник

Сириус-2UPJJ

28.12.2014

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I Was bought this printer as a Christmas present and thought great an air printer. When I opened the box and discovered a CD rom my heart missed a few beats as I only have an IPad and as anyone knows few devices have a CD-ROM drive now. I then started to read all the reviews on Amazon and again I thought this is a nightmare about to happen. I read the instructions once, carefully and then took the printer out of the box. Started again at step one and followed the quick start guide. Inside fifteen minutes I was up and running. Perfect in every way. I am by no means a technical person and am 57 years of age put I have found no difficulty in operating this printer. Small point to consider you can download an app for this printer but this is not mentioned in the quick start up instructions, this was brought to my attention by my son.

источник

Пандорец-7SDAL

28.12.2014

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

I had to get a new printer as my canon Ip6600D waste ink dispenser full!!!!!!. I knew this would not be as good as old one and that is the case. A top paper feeder is best and less trouble as printing from a cassette is so hit and miss. That is the case with this printer as it does not pick up the A4 photo glossy paper 50% of time. You cannot just put 1 glossy photo paper on top of stack of ordinary A4 paper The paper pick up system is just so-so. Good prints when it works but why cannot it be as good as an older model. Be prepared for frustration. Image garden software needs a lot of playing around with too so as to ignore all the default templates, that nobody wants, if printing your own photo dvd labels.It is always cleaning itself to waste more ink and takes 135 secs to get first print out of it.!!!!!

источник

Лунатик-8JLWN

18.12.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I wasn't enthusiastic when we purchased it as I thought that we need much more expensive model to make a good quality prints.
But this item made my and my mrs who is a professional photographer fantastic surprise. Printing quality on paper as well as on cd's is surprisingly good! This particular model does everything what we really need.

It also prints double side paper without manually turning a page! We have multiprinter from HP and it was nightmare when double sided prints were required.

It might use a lot of ink, not sure about it. But it is so convinient to replace only certain colour cartridge instead of common "colour cartridge".
Now I know that you really pay more for extra gadgets which you might don't even need. We wanted just a good photo printer and we are delighted with our purchase. Thanks

источник

НаноРейдер-7VVUI

01.06.2014

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

A very bad experience. Had this printer a few months and not done much printing. It is very flimsy compared to the last printer I had ( a hp photosmart). It was also exceptionally noisy to start up and also in operation. It is also very slow to start up and to print.

My main gripe though, is that I kept getting false error messages about the paper tray being empty when it was not, which meant I couldn't print at all. After the colour ink got used up, I had it running on just black ink but it only lasted a couple of print jobs before I started to get these paper out error messages and it would not print at all. Then one day, it randomly printed a couple of pages again but then stalled again saying the black ink was low, while also giving the error message about being out of paper.

I deliberated on whether to pay out for more ink to see if that was an issue, or just to just go ahead and get a new printer. Well, I purchased new ink and it printed a page and then went back to error message (same paper in tray from moments ago.) Couldn't find any help anywhere. Image garden the software it comes with is awful and makes scanning so tedious. Basically wasn't enjoying the printer at all and it had ground to a complete halt, so had to purchase a new one. I have gone back to Hp printer as my last one was pretty good. Quicker, quieter and more functional and intuitive. (I'm sure it will end up with issues as all printers seem to but it seems better for now).

.

источник

Лунатик-8YIKZ

01.02.2014

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

I bought from PC World as I needed a printer urgently to replace my dead iP5200R. So my impressions are based on comparison with the decade-old iP5200R.

Print quality is probably a step up from the older printer, but that could be because the new one is running on the supplied Canon inks, whilst the old one was running on compatible inks (and had been for ages - the failure was not related to that). Since I can not afford to pay more than the price of the printer at every ink refill (a set of Canon inks cost more than the printer), I will reassess the prnt quality once it is on to the compatible inks.

In every other regard the iP7250 is a significant step back from the old iP5200R.

Compared to the old iP5200R:
iP7250 will not auto-power-off if connected to the network (you must use it as a solo USB printer for power management to work)
iP7250 once switched off (manually, it won't auto power off if networked...) will not wake-on-lan when you try to print the following day.
iP7250 has no ethernet connection
iP7250 has only half the paper tray capacity (A4 paper)
iP7250 spend ages doing housekeeping, doubtless wasting ink and filling its limited-lifetime (non user-replaceable sponge
iP7250 is noisier on normal setting
iP7250 is slower on quiet setting
iP7250 has no direct paper feed for heavy paper stock
iP7250 has smaller cartridges which also cost more per cartridge

I am at a loss to see how Canon justifies its printer R&D over the last ten years. There is nothing about this printer to recommend it over a ten year old model, and much that is a genuine step back in performance, cost and convenience. It seems to have been designed purely to accommodate the requirements of other models in the range to have a scanner unit bolted on top, hence the restrictions on the paper feed and paper tray arrangements.

источник

Аргонавт-7AKQD

28.12.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

What A Fantastic Purchase. Although I purchased two sets of these ink cartridges at the end of October 2014. I only started using them two weeks ago (Mid December 2014). I was a little concerned with some of the older reviews that I had read prior to placing my order about the ink leaking whilst inserting the cartridges, but I decided the price was just too good not to give them a try. Well I will review with my own experience - NO LEAKS. I took out the empty cartridge first, removed the hard plastic cover from the new cartridge, peeled away the soft plastic seal on the top and inserted the new cartridge. One smooth successful operation and NO LEAKS. The printing is perfect including photographs. I know exactly where I will be placing my next order, with BVH DIRECT.

источник

Небулоид-9UDQK

21.01.2015

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

This printer is a great disappointment . First it took away my internet connection . so the only way that I can get on the internet is with my Laptop ,
One part of the instruction manual is on over 800 pages . there is a second instruction Manuel the second one is also about the same size so you will soon run out of ink if you print both on this printer .
The ink cartridges are very small, so will soon run out of ink.
Most computer users have a Copy of Photoshop or better still Faststone image viewer .so I se no need for all the fancy image manipulating software that comes with this printer.
It has now been returned to the seller .

источник

Гравитон-3QYKH

29.11.2014

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

I got this to replace my old Canon MP610 which has been a superb printer. The iP7250 is a huge disappointment and has spoiled my view of Canon's reputation for consistently great products. Unlike the rock solid MP610, the iP7250 is cheap-looking, insubstantial, and tacky. The plastic input and output trays are badly designed and difficult to use. It is ridiculously noisy, and the time it takes from switching it on it to being able print is a disgrace for a modern printer: more than a minute of clanking noise is the norm. If you can be bothered to wait, it does eventually produce good looking prints. But don't forget to power it down with the power button rather than powering off from the mains!

The supplied software is hopeless, too. Luckily it works with other software - including Canon's older CD print application

источник

Пульсар-9ZVEB

16.01.2013

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I'm very happy with this printer, with the exception of a couple things. First the positives: It is fairly fast, and does a nice overall print quality. Fax and scan are great. It's large but not obtrusive, considering it has the fax and scan with it. The wireless works great with all our desktops and laptops (Apple and PC). It's quiet, especially compared to the last MX700 series we had. Canon, over all, seems to be a good product. I say this because our last MX700 series was flooded with water, because in one of my more ignoramus moments, I left the window open and the sprinkler outside on and came back to a puddle on the floor and a dripping printer. I looked at the 2 inch puddle in the paper fax slot and figured it was shot. I flipped the printer upside down to let all the water out, the ink spilled as well ( note to self, don't flip printers upside down, even ones you think are dead). A couple days later, after husband forbid me to plug it back in for fear electrocution, I did that very thing (I'm a rebel + ignoramus) and after a few strange noises, and running the print head maintenance thing, It was good to go and it printed as good as the day we bought it. We used it for an additional 6 months and then one day it just died. Well, it died on what I think was it's preset death date. Now my crazy side will show, but I have a theory that all printers are designed to self destruct after a 2.7-3.5 year timeline by some evil genius engineers, (I know engineers, coming from a family of them..p.s., some of you are lacking that modesty gene and your jokes really are not as funny as you think and you shouldn't make fun of your ADD sister! hehe). Then again, maybe the blame goes to the software guys. I don't know much about them, except if they ask you to dance at a club, very politely decline. If you're single, I'm sure they would make a great date, just skip the dancing part. Another positive of this printer and the most important of all, is the tech support. They have great tech support, even if you've had your printer for a couple years the tech support people are always great..friendly, know their stuff and will not laugh at user error problems.Now the couple negatives: Ink is expensive. I know, I know... all brands are to a degree, but, Canon ink is more expensive and it seems to go incredibly fast with the 225 and the 226 cartridges. They are very tiny, so always have extras on hand, or at 3 a.m. when you decide your perfectly fine research paper needs to be re-written because it lacks a certain form of joie de vivre (damn OCD!) you panic and drive to Walmart and encounter a whole different subset of people you would never see during daylight hours. The next negative and the one that has prompted me to write this review and want to go out and purchase the updated model MX892 is the lack of AirPrint, which is on the Apple IPad 4. I guess it wasn't even an option/common a year ago when we bought this printer, so it's not really the printer's problem. It just my problem.Just be forewarned if you want to print from an IPad, buy the newer model MX892, but if it's not a concern, then I would recommend this one.

источник

Пульсар-6DDKU

18.12.2014

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

What would be an excellent printer is spoilt by two very significant flaws.
1. There is no manual feed facility and the bottom tray feed will not handle any (and I mean any) photo paper. The manual warns you not to use any paper thicker than 105gsm(!) and refers to Canon Special Media photo paper. I have searched and cannot find any reference to what "special media" means. So it is not possible to print A4 photos at all. (My previous Canon worked well through the manual feed top loading - until it jammed).
2. Cartridges are exorbitantly priced and "compatible" cartridges disable the ink level monitoring. A deliberate tactic by Canon to create a monopoly and keep prices high.
DON'T BUY.

источник

Вояджер-9QPCC

02.03.2015

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

This printer is complete rubbish unless you only want to print hi-qual photos (for which it may be fine for all I know). I used its predecessor chiefly for envelopes, plus occasional letters and documents when the main office printer was busy. Be aware that this version takes ONLY DL envelopes. Also it eats ink, and spends half its time cleaning the print heads (consuming yet more ink). I would not have bought it if this had been clear from the spec.

источник

НоваГость-8AYIH

22.02.2015

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

Set up as instructions got to the paper line up and then nothing! This machine refuses to print and comes up with paper jam error repeatedly tried to get solutions from Canon web help but all in Japanese/Chinese and other languages before finding English version which still results in error messages.Engineer needs to come out now to sort it.Have purchased a very basic Canon in mean time as I desperately need a working printer and it works perfectly yet a third of the price..

источник

Фотон-4XDMW

24.01.2015

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

What an outstanding piece of kit, so far, the Prints are Brill
Comes with a set of INKS, But I prefer the Compatables
The default setting is to power off after 240 minutes. When you power on, the printer goes through its head cleaning routine which takes time and ink. Set the 'auto-power off' to disable and the printer works both speedily and uses much less ink.
GET THE CABLE IF YOU WANT TO CONNECT TO LAPTOP/PC
Else just go wireless
Will get back to update shortly on the Printing to Disc section
For under

источник

Сатурниан-6HDIM

08.01.2015

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

I own a MG7150.
The ink quality itself is great, and the price is awesome too. Delivery was prompt and everything like that.
BUT there is no grey cartridge.
In fairness, it doesn't say there is a grey cartridge included, but the title says they're compatible with the MG7150 so it's natural to assume these are all the cartridges for that printer. I bought these at the same time as my MG7150 (thus not knowing what cartridges it used) and so trusted that these cartridges were all I needed, but they are missing the grey one.
As such, I'll probably try elsewhere next time.

источник

Дроид-5VBLK

11.03.2015

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

worst printer i have ever owned less than 36 hours), supplied software is terrible, print speeds are a joke and as for the direct to cd print function, its ok if you use the supplied templates, tried to use my images for brothers wedding dvd couldnt use full pic , had to be a cropped pic with the txt boxes still on, absolutely crap , will stick to epson in future

источник

Спектр-4WWET

04.03.2015

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

Nice unit but took about 2 days to set up ! Had to install software twice before I could get it to work. Instructions manual on CD is extremely vague and quite unhelpful. Affected my laptop radically as Windows updates were required.
Print quality, once set up, was pretty good.
Would benefit from a written manual not a CD.
I wouldn't recommend it.

источник

Аргонавт-8VWTP

14.11.2014

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

This is the most dreadful printer I have ever bought and a total waste of money. It takes a very long and noisy time to warm up and is noisy and jerky when printing. Regardless of the quality of the paper used it invariably pulls through more than one sheet of paper at a time and after printing the first dozen pages of print gave a message that I needed a new ink cartridge. The print quality is poor and it will not print pictures at all. The Canon so-called help people cannot actually help so I still don't know why it can't print pictures. This is really an appalling piece of equipment and has made me decide to never ever again buy any Canon product. Please do yourselves a favour and do not waste your money on this rubbish.

источник

ИнфраГость-4TQTP

03.12.2014

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

A great budget printer, but the cartridges are not budget making the printer itself the 'consumable' that gets thrown away. ;)

On the downside, the printer comes with a setup CD which has a very old-fashioned and fragmented install program; it requires full admin account login from start to finish; it doesn't allow user to select target install folder or menu; it installs 11 programs with each in a separate menu folder making the All Programs folder very untidy.

Once I'd run each program to see if it was of use to me, and found that most of them weren't, I uninstalled each one in turn leaving just the printer, scanner, drivers and manual.

источник

Фотон-9GBAH

10.03.2015

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

Worked perfectly for a few days then all of a sudden, without any interference from me, the Auto Duplex function stopped working and the very next day the WiFi connection failed to connect and still doesn't work after hours of resetting, rebooting, reinstalling and restarting. Great product, only if it did what it said on the box.

источник

Спектроник-9PTFW

22.08.2014

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

I’ve lived with a Canon MG3250 for a couple of years now, so I’m pretty well placed to give an accurate review. In short, it’s awful.

The Bad
- Wifi is unreliable. It has a habit of turning the wifi off, so you need to physically ‘wake up’ the printer before it’ll even think about printing over wifi, which it’ll probably refuse to do anyway, because it hates you.
- Out of ink? Need to use the scanner? Think again, my friend! That’s right, if the printer has decided it needs a new cartridge, it will refuse to scan anything. That’s great programming right there.
- It drinks ink faster than my Gran demolishes her Sunday brandy.
- It’s very, VERY slow.

The Good
- It’s pretty much entirely made of horrid, brittle plastic and, with its shoddy build quality, I’m confident that it won’t be long until it self-destructs, and I’ll be free of this crappy device.

источник

Туманник-6DAID

16.06.2014

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

I had used a canon iP4200 for very many years and found it to be excellent I like Canon products and this seemed to be the nearest equivalent so I bought one. I am disappointed that the printing of envelopes is a much more complicated procedure than that on the iP4200 which featured two paper feeds, one of which was loaded with A4 paper and the other accepted envelopes. One could print an A4 letter using one feed and simply press a button to switch to the envelope feed with no need to do anything else. The iP7250 has 2 paper feed cassettes one of which is fine for photo printing but to print an envelope one has empty the A4 cassette, reset the width and length guides to the DL-size envelope setting and then load the envelope(s) to print an envelope after which one had to reset the width and height guides to A4 size and reload the cassettes with the earlier-removed A4 paper - a very tiresome operation compared with the good old iP4200 which is no longer manufactured. I have had to follow a tip I saw online which to forget printing envelopes and substitute printing a sticky label but even this method is more complicated than the good old iP4200. Bring back the earlier and more user friendly iP4200 !

источник

Эксопилот-8TAHA

06.09.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I have never been one to keep on the cutting edge of technology when it comes to printers. Being a student all I have needed my printer to do was print my papers, or directions off of mapquest, I have never needed a photo printer. I decided that since I'm going to be student teaching soon I would buy a better quality printer so my handouts would be of a better quality than my current all-in-one(a lexmark) could produce. Also, I have a 2 year old and want to print off pictures that I have taken of him so I wanted a good quality photo printer as well. I could not be happier with my choice to get this printer.I had shopped around online and read reviews of many different brands and models before deciding that this one had the features I was looking for, good reviews and was priced well (it was also on sale when I got it). Wireless setup was very straight forward and easy. The printer saw my network and after a few entries it was connected. Installing the printer on my computers was the most time consuming part of the process as each computer took 18 minutes to install off of the CD provided. All told setup took a little more than an hour but I had the extra computer to install it on and I also needed to find a new place to house my printer because this one is much bigger than my last all-in-one so those both added to installation time. I also have an Android phone and downloaded an app that allows me to print photos off my phone over the wi-fi connection which was also easy to setup.As I stated this printer is mush bigger than my last printer and that's the only thing I don't care for about the printer. I read one of the reviews that stated it had the same size footprint as the reviewers last printer and that can be misleading. This is a printer designed for a home-office or small business and it's size reflects that. I knew what I was getting into with the size of this printer so I'm not upset about the size but be warned that this printer takes up some space. One of the reasons I bought a wireless printer was so that I could put it out of the way off the desk and that would be necessary with printer anyway because of the size.As for the quality, I am blown away. The quality is on par with going to a target or Rite-Aid to have digital photos printed out. I decided to challenge it with a picture I had recently taken at the zoo in a tunnel that goes beneath the seal tank. The picture has many vivid colors in it (blues, yellows, pinks) and has quite a few people in it standing in the background. The printer pulled it off flawlessly!! The colors are vivid, the people in the foreground and background look great and there are no lines from the print head to be found anywhere in the picture. I admit that I have only printed off a few pictures but I have yet to be less than thrilled by the quality so far, and like i said I am choosing pictures I feel would be challenging for a printer. I have printed out a few documents as well to check the speed and like I had read in other reviews it is average. It's not faster nor slower than other printers I have used (at least not noticeably). I like that it has auto-duplexing and that it scans both sides of the document as well.There are enough bells and whistles that I needed to look some things up on the online user manual. I find that I am usually savvy enough that I can work my way through new gadgets with manuals but this printer had me guessing a couple times so I would recommend taking a few minutes to look up issues yo might find. I do miss the days when instruction manuals were on paper in the box but I guess those days are gone forever now. There is a basic instruction guide that will walk you though set-up but that's about it.As I'm sure you can tell I'm very pleased with the purchase of this printer. I would highly recommend it to anyone that is looking for a quality printer while staying in a budget.***UPDATE***4 months later and I'm still very happy with the purchase. I have had to change my wireless modem twice since getting the printer and setting up the printer takes 30 seconds. It is very easy to use and the quality still blows me away.I have found something that I'm less than thrilled about however. When doing double-sided printing the auto-duplexing does take more time. If you like to hit the print button and get your two-sided document quickly you will be frustrated. That being said this is a small office printer on the price scale so there's bound to be a caveat somewhere.I have used the printer many many times over the last 4 months and would still recommend this product in a heartbeat. Even with the slow duplex printing I'm sticking with the 5 stars.

источник

Кронос-9XVOK

16.10.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I just set up this printer. I was a bit taken aback that the setup disc is only compatible with Windows 8 as I have Windows 7, But the iP7200 series driver works fine, and I am happy with the imaging software I have. I've printed out four photos and the quality looks good. I alsoi did a test page on A4 plain paper, though initially I had trouble loading the A4 tray correctly, and the printer has crunched a few sheets. It is noticeable that when I send a job to the printer it spends some time priming itself with ink. This may have an impact on cartridge life, I don't know yet. I think the way to minimize this is once you turn the printer on, leave it on for the rest of the day. Prints aren't produced very fast, but as this is only my home printer I don't mind this too much.

источник

Гравитон-6DRKI

03.06.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I'm a semi professional photographer whose been looking to make his own prints for quite some time, to have complete control over the process of creating an image and then printing it. The Canon Pixma Pro 100 is an excellent printer, it produces vivid images using Canon papers. I've yet to try papers from ilford etc but I'm sure the results will be just as good.
The foot print of the Pro 100 is quite big and it's quite heavy at 19kg (26kg net weight in the box), but as long as you
have a suitable table to keep it on, then it's not much of a problem. Canon have helpfully packaged the printer in such a way that you have handles to lift it out of the box and to carry it. While the Ink appears expensive, the quality of the finished prints is as good as what you can get from various print suppliers. Printer setup is best done using the supplied USB cable, then you can set it up for Wifi or an Ethernet connection. I recommend downloading the mini setup tool from Canon, as it makes connecting the printer to Wifi or Ethernet much easier.

Who would I recommend this printer to ? Photographers who want to take control of every step of creating a photograph from taking it, editing in Lightroom/Photoshop to printing it.

источник

Дроид-0MDXS

12.02.2014

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

I wanted a WiFi printer as my last printer was a HP and lasted 5 months. It was very expensive to run as ink kept running out (the last set of ink was genuine HP and lasted 4 days!) So I got a Canon MG3250 as there wasn't much choice in the supermarket (Only 3 inkjets to choose from!). This looked beautiful out of the box and very good quality, with auto-duplex, but the set up was a nightmare! It took 2 days when I first tried to set up the WiFi. I have inserted the disc about 3 times, as I kept getting the message "Printer is offline" even though I had set up the WiFi, as per the complicated instructions. For some reason, some days it recognises the WiFi and then it will just go offline for no reason. Once it's gone offline, you have to set it up again. It did it again this morning, and rather than faff around with the disc again I decided to follow one of the reviews on Amazon. It was suggested that you use your own PC to add the printer, so I went into control panel and added the printer that way. I didn't have to mess around again with the USB cable, and it said it had fixed a problem. We'll see. I shall update to let you know if the WiFi goes off again. Otherwise, when the WiFi is working I can print from my laptop and tablets, which is great. However, I have yet to work out how to use the Scan option. It just won't scan. With the other printer you put the document into the machine, and pressed scan. How do you scan with the Canon? - I have no idea. The instructions are very very complicated! As someone has pointed out, the software for it is poor too and instruction even worse!

источник

Интеллектор-4YGFY

11.09.2014

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

Bought this printer for printing the odd photos and also for doing letters. The product details state 'The fully integrated double paper cassettes allow loading of different sizes and types of paper at the same time'. However what is not evident until you receive the printer is that the upper cassette only takes photo paper sizes. The lower tray takes A4 and the DL envelopes - but not at the same time. Now every time I want to do a letter I have to print the letter and then pull out the lower cassette, take out the A4 and load the DL enveleope - what a faff. This is a backwards step from my old IP4600 which could be loaded with DL envelopes on the rear tray while the A4 remained in the main tray. Come on Canon get a grip - not everyone only uses your printers for photos and you've just made things unnecessarily difficult. I wish I'd never bought this ridiculous piece of junk.

источник

Синтрон-0WPYI

08.01.2015

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

The worse printer I ever had.
It is my third printer in a year, I had it replaced twice and will just bin it this time. All of them has the same problem, either does not pick up or jam paper smaller than A4. I wasted so much paper with it that can't even bothered to send it to Canon to have it replaced again. The print quality is nice, however it can not handle any thicker paper. Would never recommend if you are looking to print other than A4 size documents

источник

Гиперион-7LZXB

18.12.2014

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

I've used Canon products ever since I got my first SLR camera in the 60s and have always found them to be excellent... until this pile of totally useless junk. My excellent ip4500 printer recently packed up after pretty heavy use and so I replaced it with this - apparently its successor. It couldn't be more different... completely impossible to use, and when (if) you finally do get it to work, it takes about 10 minutes to get round to doing a print. Avoid at all costs. 50 years of Canon loyalty has just been thrown out of the window.

источник

Гравитон-1EGEE

28.01.2015

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

terrible printer, the worst i have ever had. set up was easy enough, but there were always problems with connecting wirelessly and then it developed a fault with misaligned heads that we couldn't fix....meaning that everything came out blurred. also drank ink like you won't believe. junked within three months. waste of money! and really really noisy when printing as well. avoid.

источник

ОмниКод-8AOVX

11.03.2015

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Amazing! Definitely going to get myself some more. Have bought several of these cheaper cannon inks on Amazon and these are not only the cheapest but the best out there. Just as good printing quality as the originals. Thank you!!!

источник

Квантум-4AYKJ

27.01.2014

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I didn't buy this printer from Amazon, due to a catalogue of delivery confusion. However, I did pick one up at my local PC World and am so far very happy with it.
I wanted a photo printer that did just that - not one that tries to be a fax and a scanner as well. I had no need for the wi-fi option but a USB cable was supplied to get around that.
Results are good. It can be a tad noisy compared to the Canon Pixma iP4500 that it replaced, but it has a Quiet Setting (don't know what the trade-off has been when using this mode, but surely there must be one, or it would run quieter all the time?). There is no back feed, but it takes my 200gsm gloss photo paper which appears to have no difficulty in traveling round the rollers and back on itself. This makes for a smaller desk footprint that is further enhanced by the fact that the paper tray are situated in the base of the actual printer, which I like.
Regular plain paper printing is great as it can print both sides of a sheet of 80gsm paper, so can half your expense for that kind of material.
There are lots of printing gizmos included, that enable to include your photographs in templates that provide a number of useful printed items and the available range of settings mean that this a very flexible printer by any standard.
When you hit your "Print" icon, the paper delivery flap pops out automatically and doesn't have to clutter your desk for the duration.
I like this printer very much so far and if it gives me the quality and length of service that its Canon predecessor did I shall consider it money well spent.
I had to pay

источник

Пандорец-4SKEE

12.06.2012

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

When our old, well-loved Canon PIXMA 850 died, we replaced it with the Canon PIXMA MX882. I chose both because they allow wired-network operation (I found wireless to be frustrating when things would go into power-saving mode). We don't use Fax, so this review will not address Fax. We do use the printer for printing, copying and scanning, and it is very satisfactory for these purposes--but, only with all software fully updated and after learning a few quirky operational details.First, networked setup took me a long time. First, you have to connect to some computer by USB cable to configure everything. Manual-reading is necessary. You have to navigate the printer's display menus to get the correct network configuration, including entering your router IP address. Once you get it to connect, you disconnect from USB and can then install the printer software on any networked PC's.The software was initially VERY buggy and barely worked. Using Windows Update, I was able to install MANY updates to the Canon software. These appeared automatically as non-urgent software updates, but it took multiple iterations and reboots to get all those updates to install. Only after that was done, did printing work well over the network.It took me forever to learn how to make the scanner work reliably. There is a display menu on the printer that purports to allow you to select the target PC that will do the scanning. I could never get this to work, and it is stuck in a state that says USB is the scanning target (which doesn't work). However, I eventually consulted the manual and found that there is a separate utility (the IJ Network Scanner Selector, or some such); if you run that utility after placing the printer in Scan mode, you can instruct your PC to connect to the printer as a scanner, and it all works great from that point on.Bad as all this was, I expected it. Buggy software is normal for Canon printers, but if you can finally conquer all these hurdles, you have an easy-to-use workhorse of a printer/scanner/copier that should last you for a few years. It starts complaining of low ink before it's actually out. We override that and continue using the ink until it really doesn't print well anymore. We buy the next ink in advance, so we're always ready. Also, we operate for everyday usage in ink-saving (Fast Printing) mode, which is fine for normal usage. With these precautions, ink usage won't be excessive, and if you're offended by Canon's ink prices, there are 3rd-party ink cartridges that seem to work fine.This printer has a Quiet mode, and you can program it always to use Quiet mode during certain hours. Quiet mode is truly quieter, and of course, commensurably slower. I love Quiet mode, as we live in a small place, so if one of us needs to print early or late, we are less likely to wake up the household. It remembers the Quiet mode hours permanently.So once it gets all set up, software updated, and learning curve conquered, I can happily give this workhorse 5 stars, like I did its predecessor, and MX 850.One last warning on annoyances; we use this printer for 4 or 5 different computers. On at least one computer, I always have to reinstall the printer, and for reasons not understood (well, a bug!), the old printer will not UNinstall correctly. So forever after, that PC will show two versions of the printer in its menus, such as Canon Pixma MX880 and Canon Pixma MX880 (Copy 1). And only the "Copy 1" version works; you just have to remember that. See what I mean about buggy software? But it doesn't change the fact that the hardware works great, reliably, cheaply, fast enough, and with good quality printouts.

источник

Странник-6EBCK

12.01.2015

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

Replacing a Canon ip4700 which I have had for some years without a problem, this printer is absolutely CRAP its complicated, noisy, temperamental, I haver just finished my first set of cartridges, and the new ones won't print properly even after running countless cleaning cycles. When it was working, I was actually quite impressed with the print quality, but I am afraid its going in the bin after a month of light use

источник

• «
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9
• 10
• 11
• 12
• 13
• 14
• 15
• 16
• 17
• 18
• 19
• 20
• 21
• 22
• 23
• 24
• 25
• 26
• 27
• 28
• 29
• 30
• 31
• 32
• 33
• 34
• 35
• 36
• 37
• 38
• 39
• 40
• 41
• 42
• 43
• 44
• 45
• 46
• 47
• 48
• 49
• 50
• 51
• 52
• 53
• 54
• 55
• 56
• 57
• 58
• 59
• 60
• 61
• 62
• 63
• 64
• 65
• 66
• 67
• 68
• 69
• 70
• 71
• 72
• 73
• 74
• 75
• 76
• 77
• 78
• 79
• 80
• 81
• 82
• 83
• 84
• 85
• 86
• 87
• 88
• 89
• 90
• 91
• 92
• 93
• 94
• 95
• 96
• 97
• 98
• 99
• 100
• 101
• 102
• 103
• 104
• 105
• 106
• 107
• 108
• 109
• 110
• 111
• 112
• 113
• 114
• 115
• 116
• 117
• 118
• 119
• 120
• 121
• 122
• 123
• 124
• 125
• 126
• 127
• 128
• 129
• 130
• 131
• 132
• 133
• 134
• 135
• 136
• 137
• 138
• 139
• 140
• 141
• 142
• 143
• 144
• 145
• 146
• 147
• 148
• 149
• 150
• 151
• 152
• 153
• 154
• 155
• »