У нас 28 120 272 отзывов

на 556 023 товаров

Отзывы о Мфу Canon Pixma TS3340

7376 отзывов пользователей о Canon Pixma TS3340

Пользовались Canon Pixma TS3340?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор

Оставить свой отзыв

3723

1589

627

488

949

Пандорец-4GMVJ

11.02.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I can't praise this printer enough. I haven't owned an inkjet printer, so maybe I'm easily impressed. But from the moment I brought it home, this printer has exceeded my expectations.The S300 is quite small, so it fit easily into my (somewhat cramped) office. It was very easy to hook up to my computer and install the drivers on Windows. The written instructions were clear, and the driver installation program guided me through the head calibration task in no time.After that, everything just worked. I printed out a few color images and web pages just for fun, and have since used it quite often to print out verious tax-related documents and letters. The print quality is impressive, even on plain paper. The printing speed is fine for most documents. And the little extras like automatic power on/off make the printer a joy to use.I expected to have to pay twice what I did to get a printer I was happy with. At around $100, this printer is astoundingly good.A word of warning: the ink cartridges for this printer are quite small, so if you're looking for a home office printer, you should probably get something more industrial-stength. However, if you only need to print a few pages every now and then, but still want reasonable print quality, then the S300 is ideal for you.

источник

Вояджер-6OPWD

19.10.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

The i320 is very space efficient and asthetically pleasing. I do like the small footprint. And it's fast too. I bought it after extensive research on the web and I'm very pleased with it. It's very fast once you change the print options and I've impressed with the speed. I have not used it to print photos yet on photo paper, but from the demo that I saw, I know I'll be pleased. Really easy set-up too

источник

Нейрон-4XSGO

03.08.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I bought this camera only a little time ago and it has been my dearest pal. It is so easy to use and the options are simple to read so that even a primate could figure out how to increase or decrease the picture size. The movie format is exceptionally, it makes it better because it has a microphone. The USB2 connection makes it attach to the computer. The software that comes with it is interesting for people who don't have programs such as Adobe Photoshop. The battery has quite a lot of juice. Be sure to recharge for more than 4 hours (do it while your sleeping), for a good 2 day or more use. This camera and package comes with everything one would want.

источник

Гиперион-4ETQZ

19.07.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I opted for this printer in a systems bundle over the normal Lexmark offering. I already own a S600 but wanted a printer for my kids to use and this was the choice for me. Graphics are good and so is text. Speed is high for this price point. I am using this on a T1220 emachines system on a home network and am sharing it with my laptop. Everything has worked to perfection. It has auto on/off power settings and ink cartridge meters. The other thing that made this my choice was the cost of ink replacement. My daughter uses Disney Magic Artist and can drain ink faster than she drains a gallon of milk (fast).Replacement cartridges are much more reasonable than other brands. Good Value printer!!!!!

источник

Лунатик-3TZTB

25.10.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Setup is a breeze on XP. Took 5-10 minutes to install w/software. Bought a PCI USB 2.0 5-port card ... and a USB 2.0 cable. This makes a huge difference in print speed. Also has a large printer buffer (248KB) ram for an inkjet. Also this printer doesn't smear its ink like my old HP did. The cartridges are reasonably priced unlike HP. ...

источник

Гелиос-9ZKPT

09.03.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I needed a new inkjet printer and wanted something high-quality but also below $200. So I surfed the web and looked over many websites and reviews. I gathered that the Canon S series is the best for the money. The Canon S520 features four separate ink tanks so you can replace individual colors as they run out, which will save you money in the long run. It's also a fast printer, but I'm not usually in much of a hurry to print something. If you print a picture in high-quality resolution it can take a little longer (still quite speedy), but the results are fabulous. I've only used cheap plain paper so far, but photos and graphics still look really great. I'm sure it would look even better on higher quality paper. Also, plain text was printed very crisply as well, no complaints in that department. The printer is even really quiet, it makes very little noise. Overall I was really happy with this Canon S520 printer; it prints great looking color graphics/photos and it's pretty cheap, quiet and fast. I really can't find any fault with this printer, it's performed beyond expectations. Top-quality color inkjet printer - 5 STARS!

источник

НаноПилигрим-0YEVG

10.12.2001

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I think this is a very good printer overall.I am sharing the printer on a Windows 98 machine and two Windows 2000 computers are printing to it over a network. No problems at all. I am using this as a home office printer. Printing photo quality documents is not important to me. I print many technical documents though for my own use. So far, this printer has worked out great. I have been printing in "draft" format to save ink and it still comes out very dark. I set it to use even less ink than in draft mode and I am still happy with the text and graphic results. I did print out some photos at high res and plain copy paper just to see the results and my wife and I were impressed.I just printed a 186 page PDF on both sides and it worked without any problems. I printed the whole thing out even pages first, flipped them and printed out the odd pages. I thought it would choke but it handled it like a champ (my old HP could have never handled it). By the way, I am printing through the parallel port.Pros:Very easy to install. Easy to configure and use. Workes great on a network. Driver seems to work well both on win98 and win2000. Very good graphics even at low quality.Cons:Sort of noisy when preparing itself to print. Quite a large footprint on the desktop. Seems to use lots of ink by default but is user configurable. When refilling paper on empty, need to press a button to tell it paper has been refilled.

источник

Синтрон-3TWFT

26.07.2002

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

I bought this camer 2 months ago and fell in love with it...until: the auto focus became finicky and it took 3-5 seconds to take a picture, the battery life and auto power down function became finicky, the lense would not always retract when powered down, the pictures instantly became fuzzy and "whited out" like bad reception on a TV (tech support could not solve) yet the video worked, the sound on the video began giving everyone speaking a lisp. My camera is now on it's way to canon repair services, I hope I get back a new camera because I think I got the Jaguar of the digital camera industry.

источник

Пандорец-4PQFQ

13.11.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

This product is GREAT. We really enjoy the size--eay to "tote and carry". We never leave home without it. It is very handy to carry along on all of our island hopping expeditions, especially to Great Inagua, Bahamas.

источник

ХроноГость-4SJVJ

16.05.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

This is in addition to my other review of this excellent camera.I forgot to mention the accessories for this,1. Get one or two extra Canon NB-1LH batteries. This is the most important thing will need one a long day. (Don't get the older NB-1L, it had 25% lower capacity).2. Get a Canon PSC-100 Soft Compact Case for this. 3. Spend some money and get either a 128MB or 256MB CF card. 128MB should me enough for most people.4. CF card reader is NOT needed, the USB cable that comes with the camera works perfectly fine.Buy only Canon branded battery/case for this camera, don't try the cheap imitations in the market. Same for CF card, buy only a branded one. Everything is available here on Amazon itself so get these things along with your camera purchase. Ofcourse this is just from my experience and may not be totally true with your case !

источник

ИнфраГость-9PQLA

18.06.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

This replaces all my other cameras. This sturdy, pocket size digital camera takes amazing point and shoot instant pics, and has a plethora of options you can set on the small, but high quality digital display. Sensitivity, color depth and resolution are great for high-quality prints up to 5x7. Available light pictures are very good if you hold the cameras steady while shooting. Flash images tend to have strong reds, but correct easily with any digital image processing program, including the one supplied with the camera. Don't forget to set your printer's paper and color Properties. Set the colors to match your monitor and it will be much easier to make any minor corrections to the exposure and color of each print.

источник

Странник-2IGMM

13.05.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I just got this camera from amazon a few days ago, and so far I LOVE IT! It's really tiny (no bigger than a credit card) but built really sturdy so you don't feel like it's going to break if you accidentally happen to drop it. It's perfect to carry with you everywhere. The LCD screen is really nice with the new anti-smudge technology. The screen looks "snowy" under low light, but I really don't mind too much...the pictures come out great! The camera does get warm after some extended use, but that should be normal for such a compact camera. The video mode isn't extensive, but a great bonus and fun to play around with. The ease of use makes this a great first digital camera, but the variety of control settings, such as adjusting the ISO and effects mode, also make this camera suitable for those who like to be more creative.

источник

Плазмоид-0CEGL

23.09.2002

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Have had this printer for about a year now at least. Output quality is excellent, but maybe I just haven't figured out printing pictures the optimal way. Consumable cost is reasonable, but I wish third party refills were a good option. Printing speed is slow at times, but being a home user I really can't justify paying more for a faster printer. Overall very happy with purchse.

источник

МехаРейнджер-3VSJA

30.06.2001

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I always thought that if I wanted a printer, it would automatically be an HP, there was never a second doubt especially since my older brother had bought his P1000 in late December and was more than satisfied printing his very detailed 8 x 10 photos in very fine ink on beautiful photo paper. And when I was going to buy my first printer, I was pretty much looking for HP's, but obviously not as [much]as that ..price tag that came with the P1000. And it was then that I stumbled across this S600, with people saying that it rivaled the higher-end HP's P1000 and P1250. I thought I would take a gamble, especially after seeing the price at below.., less than half the price of my brother's printer. Installation was easy, and the printing program is very informational yet simple. But it was the actual printing that I couldn't believe. Very fine prints on 4 x 6 and even 8 x 10 at its highest resolution. They say it can print a photo at 8 x 10 in 90 seconds, but it took a few minutes for my photo and I don't expect any home printer to print any photo with quality that good at that speed. And the more easy black prints come out fast as usual. Ink cartridges will never be very [much] here as my brother's P1000 Photo Cartridge was indeed [a lot] used up very quickly. I don't need a slot for any Memory Card, I really doubt there are people who need a slot in their printer unless they are in a ridiculous hurry, and that is the only thing that P1000 has that my S600 doesn't. The S600 has everything else, and in some cases, does it better than those high-end HP's. Retail stores don't give a listed price because they are high on demand but low in stock. So to find it underneath is already lower than what most of the national retail stores are going to sell it. Buy This Printer if you want a reasonably priced printer that just happens to print things that would usually cost more.

источник

Аргонавт-1BTDN

27.06.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Ordered Canon S520 printer on a Sunday from Amazon.com at a price plus shipping that was lower than 90% of their competiton. Printer arrived on the following Wednesday. It came complete except USB cable which is standard these days for printers and I knew it was not supplied by manufacturer. It took me about 45 minutes from opening the box to printing the first color photo to set the printer up on Win98 2nd OS. It runs just like advertised. Does excellent job on both color and black and white printing. I did not care about the black and white because I have a HP laser that is my default doc. printer. Absolutely amazing! How easy can it get?

источник

НеоВояжер-0KSUH

17.05.2002

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

...Pros: Stylish design; Convenient to hold; Easy to use; Good close up picture quality; Good LCD; Immediate shutter response; Easy to lear manual.Cons: Cannot focus under any conditions on anything half a meeter away from the camera; Very apparent artifacts. Everything in the picture including yourself looks like a poster; Very flat and poor feeling of the colors on indoor pictures; After downloading the pictures from the camera to the PC and checking the pictures on the PC, I was so disappointed; Also experienced a bug the first installing the software. Compared side by side with some pictures taken by a Fuji Finepix 40i, Fuji does a much much much better job.Conclusion: Good for show and tell, not for taking pictures. Canon seems not worth its reputation. How did it get it?

источник

Астрон-0YKFZ

09.07.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I wanted small size and a great picture. This has it! You know bulky cameras on vacation are a chore to carry, many times you opt out of taking it with you. I wanted a no-brainer solution for this dilemma and found it. Great Picture quality, great color, ease of use and intuitive menus. Sure it's *only* 2MP, with only a 2x Optical Zoom, but easy trade-offs for what I was seeking. I bought 2-128MB CF cards, a CF card reader and a spare battery for lots of pictures and no hastle with connecting the camera to the computer. Shop around for price, you don't have to (and should not) pay retail!

источник

ИнфраГость-1KMEJ

25.11.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Great printer. Easy to use and the photo quality is wonderful! Have just bought a 2nd i550 printer as a gift!

источник

Зета-Орион-7QALU

20.10.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

First digital camera. Very good picutre quality. Easy to operate. Would recomend to othrers. Must buy more memory the 8mb is a JOKE. I would suggest a 128 that will hold enough photos for you. Price is good to.

источник

НеоВояжер-3ADVH

01.09.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

This is the first digital camera I have purchased and am very happy with the purchase. It is fairly easy to use and controls are quite intuitive. There is a host of features I haven't used, and may never use, but the basic point, shoot and look is easy to use, both still and motion. The pictures look great in either digital or hard copy. I would recommend this camera to anyone.

источник

Капеллан-8OHVT

03.09.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I am not the most knowledgeable person on this subject but because of the ease of set up and the quality of the prints I have to give this product a 5 star rating. I made this purchase to compliment my Canon Power Shot G-2 camera and I couldn't be happier. My wife was skeptical but after just a few photos she has realised the savings,time,and ease that we will enjoy.

источник

Эксопилот-9WKMV

19.05.2002

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

For several years I've used a Canon BJC2114 with satisfaction. I could write a decent looking letter or report, E-mails were legible, and the color projects were okey +. I was looking for much better in the S520. I'm using the Parallel cable that I had with the BJC2114, and I don't know if I need the UBS cable to develope more speed. Color Photos take forever now, just as long as the old printer. Also I can't seem to get the envelope to print properly, although it may not be the fault of the printer. I use Word Perfect and maybe that's where I need help.As it is the return address is in the lower left hand corner. and the addressee is on its side toward the right center. Help

источник

Фотон-8OYMK

17.03.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

After doing a lot of web research, I finally chose the Canon S520 color printer to replace my Epson 740, which was beginning to give me problems and use a lot of ink. So far I love it! Installing the Canon printer software went smoothly, and the USB connection works well (there were problems with my PC recognizing the Epson printer using the USB port).After using the Canon S520 for a few months now, I am extremely happy with my choice. It's much quieter and faster than my Epson, and appears to use less ink (it isn't constantly going through the noisy, time consuming and wasteful cleaning cycles that my Epson did). Black and white documents printed in Draft mode look just fine and are very fast to print. Although it's not billed as a "photo" printer, photos come out great too. In addition, the ink cartridges are cheaper than the Epson or HP cartridges, and you can replace one color at a time.

источник

Гиперион-7JCVJ

16.01.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

i previously owned a lexmark 3200 color printer and decided it was time to upgrade to something nicer and more economical (in reference to the ink cartridges). i did lots of research and read many reviews about the canon s600. i read some that were sub-par and was worried it would give me problems. i purchased it anyway and immediately after installing it, i printed a large bitmap picture (nearly taking up a full sheet). the quality and speed were incredible!! it's also very smooth and quiet. i'm a college student and now i can print my papers at 3 a.m. when i finish and not worry about waking up my roommate because of a loud printer. i am extremely satisfied with this printer!! i can't believe the exceptionally good photo quality at such a low price. i have scanned photos and printed them on photo paper....my friends couldn't even tell the difference! and i love the separate ink cartridges!! with the lexmark i often had to replace the color cartridge b/c one color was empty but the other two were going strong. not so with this canon!! i highly recommend it to anyone!

источник

ОмниКод-7PXII

24.06.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

This is my 2nd digital camera, as I moved up from HP C200. This camera will do everything you need to do. 8x10 are great quality. The 4x6 is of lab quality on highest resolution. This camera is probably one of the most energy efficent camera. If you hate buying aa batteries this is the camera for you. You will need to get a bigger flashcard. I have a 128 mb flashcard. I can get 96 highest resolution and highest compression photos.I will not need to get another camera for quite some time, and am very pleased with photo quality

источник

Интеллектор-9KYIS

05.05.2002

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I've owned a Canon S300 printer for the past six months, and I've been very pleased overall with it. It prints high quality black and white text and SUPERB photographic images.The first time I printed a photo on this printer, using glossy paper, I thought I was looking at a conventional print created from 35mm film. The resolution is exceptionally high, color is accurate and there is no pixellation.When turning the printer on, it takes about 30 seconds for it to go through its start-up routine, which involves unexplainable machinations that are akin to uncontrolled muscle twitching. However, this is common among inkjet printers.I recommend this printer without any reservations.

источник

Небулоид-3QYVY

26.09.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I know nothing about computers. My son bought me this printer. It was very easy to set up and prints great. I highly recommend it to all users. Experienced or like me, NOT.

источник

Квантум-9ILFA

09.03.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I just bought the 500 printer for my daughter to take the place of a printer that was included in a new computer pkg. The 520 is an update, offering a little better speed than its predecessor without adding much to the cost. While most printers have now become quite inexpensive, they have very high operating costs (think of it as a "free" cell phone with a very high per minute rate). Anyway, this Canon S520 is quite efficient with the ink, and uses individual tanks for black and colors, so only what's been used has to be replaced. The speed is awesome (14 ppm B&W, 3/4 of that in color) at this price, and the mechanism is extremely quiet. What a perfect combination for the dorm! Lastly, the freebie I've disconnected was USB only, whereas this one offers a choice of USB or parallel connectivity. Not long ago, this printer would have cost 10 times as much!

источник

Эксопилот-2YXYL

31.12.2001

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

setup was easy. print beautiful, quick. price great. after having lexmark printers, i shopped with regard to replacement ink prices. canon replacement ink prices seemed reasonable. after purchase, i saw the ink tanks were tiny (9ml black, 5mlx3 color). my old lexmark tanks don't indicate volume, but they look to be 3 times larger than the canon. with the lexmark, i was getting 6 months(about 1000 pages) of printing. with the canon, i used up the black ink after only about 100 pages (half of them cd covers) in 16 days. print quality was set at "standard"- and did not "clean heads" or do other ink-wasting activities. i got far less than the 300 pages the manual says you'll get, esp. when you consider the number of pages that were plain cd covers. i used the tank until it failed- did not replace when the warning came up (worked for about 20 pages). i haven't done much color printing yet, only a few photos and mixed documents. i'm sure the color won't last long, either (manual says 170 pages). i recommend the printer, but be sure to have replacement ink tanks on hand.

источник

НеоВояжер-9LWHF

21.06.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

... It took about 5 minutes to set up the printer. I printed some pictures on supplied 4x6 glossy paper. The qality is just amazing. I couldn't make out any difference between a lab developed picture and the one I printed. The printer is kind of noisy and shakes my whole desk when it prints but much less than the HP682c it replaced. Overall I love it and the ink is probably be the cheapest in this category. It would have been nice if Cannon supplied the $2 USB cable with the package.

источник

ОмниКод-9CWWS

19.07.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

les cuento que quede maravillado con la camara ya que es peque?isima ademas de las variadas funciones y espectacular nitides en las imagenes y peliculas yo la recomiendo por sobre todo ademas de su sencilles de manejo y alta calidad en su presentacion .el cargador de bateria que trae es muy versatil ya que se puede ocupar con cualquier voltaje en USA: o Sud America y Europa

источник

Спектроник-9DROY

26.07.2001

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

This is the first printer I have owned and used at home so I really have nothing to compare it to other than the HP laser we have at the office. That said, I am very happy with this printer. I have been using it with my Koday DC280 digital camera (also purchased from Amazon after careful research), with excellent results. The pictures I just printed from a recent camping trip are virtually indistinguishable from 35 mm prints. Now don't get me wrong, you can tell the difference, but only with close inspection. For quick and easy pictures, I really like using the 4x6 Canon Glossy Photo Cards which are just as good as the Canon photo paper pro for about $4 less. I also looked at the S800 when shopping for a printer. The only difference I could see was the print speed was faster on the S800 and I think it uses a different type of ink. Whether the ink affects the photos or not I don't know, but they do call the S800 a photo printer. Without being able to compare the two head to head, I decided to save the $100 in price difference and I have no regrets whatsoever. I would also say that while I don't consider the S600 a "fast" printer like the reviewer who was dissatisfied with his, I wouldn't say it's slow either. I'd say it's just about right.Overall I am extremely pleased with this printer and would recommend it to anyone. The price is right and the pictures are wonderful.I really like to read all the reviews I can on a product before I buy it and put a lot of weight into what other customers think about their purchase. So there's my two cents, that's what you wanted right?

источник

ХроноГость-0KFJT

08.04.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Was about to buy an ... 820, but after reading the reviews here, bought the S520. By carefully following setup instructions, was up in 15 minutes. It is fast (2 minutes to print a sunset on 8.5 x 11 paper, and about 10 seconds for a page of text). Photo quality is excellent-couldn't tell the difference whether using 94-brightness laser paper, or some Epson photo-quality inkjet paper. Prints made on the sample 4 x 6 glossy stock looked like they came from the photolab. Only problem was printing across multiple pages for a poster (2 x 2 sheets). Printer would only print 2 pages, and feed 2 blank pages. Was able to workaround by manually selecting 2 of 4 sheets at a time to print. I love this printer.

источник

НоваГость-2WOKB

15.04.2002

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

It's funny, I'd always understood printer sharing to be a nowmal window feature. As long as both computers have the proper driver for a printer, one can share a printer to the other. This is not the case for this printer.After spending a couple of weeks getting it working, I sent a note to Canon's tech support. Their response?"Unfortunately, this printer was not designed to be shared across a network."We have three different computers around the house, used by three different people. This printer isn't exactly portable, so just hauling it around to whatever computer needs it is just unreasonable.I am very disapointed that this very basic functionality has been omitted.

источник

Плазмоид-0LIGJ

14.07.2002

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

The Canon S300 has been a nightmare. My invoices come out fuzzy and or faded. After two months of lite work it needed a part replaced. Plus the ink cartridges are so small that you have to replace them very often and office depot and other suppliers don't carry them, so you better not run out. The only place I have found them is on the internet.

источник

Гелиос-2PTGG

30.04.2001

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I have owned Epsons, HPs, Xerox's and Canons. This is the best one of all. First i got the HP1100 photosmart back in January 2000. It was pretty much top of the line then. I didnt think much would top it for speed and photo quality. But once i started to see some photo printers out on the market, i realized the HP 1100 was NOT really for total photo quality, it was more of a speedy really nice color printer. so i bought a Canon 8200 due to the reviews i had seen in Popular Photography magazine. I Still have it. They said it was #1 so i took their word for it. They were right. It beats everything in photos. Hands down. I heard a lot about the Epson 870 for photos so i bought that just to see if it was better than my 8200 for a couple weeks. it printed really nice pictures, very close to my 8200 from canon but its slow performance and high ink costs forced me to take it back early. Hearing about the new S600 from Canon with higher resolution than their 8200 i figured i'd try that one too. IT ROCKS. ITS MUCH MUCH faster than my 12 page a minute HP 1100 and the photos are just out right astonishing. (gave the HP 1100 away) Any picture i can take, it can print. If i need a 20 page report when i'm running out the door, i get it quickly between using the bathroom and finding my car keys. the manual says the black cartrdige goes 695 pages. You know me, i have to try it. YES, i wasted a whole ink cartridge and tons of paper just to see. OK, so i'm a nerd. Anyways, i printed 768 pages before the well ran dry. At [the price] for that many pages, i'm not tyring to buy no other printer. I LOVE cheap ink cartridges! you buy the printer once but you pay for ink for the next 4 years. SPEED and beautiful photos wrapped up in one; It wasnt possible unitl now. I found it in the Canon S600 and i hope you do too.

источник

Странник-6GFBC

25.06.2002

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I deleted all of the review that was on here previously. After many, many e-mails with Canon, the printer will print on 4 X 6 photo paper. It tells me to change the size, but I just igmore it. One representative suggested that I use the Canon ZoomBrowser. That makes you enter a whole file of pictures, but somehow, after that, I was able to print one picture, not using ZoomBrowser....

источник

Кварковец-7ZSGR

13.11.2001

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

(. . .)out of the box it was fairly easy to unpack and set up. Quick setup instructions were exact. The driver installation was straight forward. The head calibration was straight forward.I would say that it took me around 20 minutes from opening the box to printing my first image.I am printing through my parallel port, not USB. I have not noticed any performance degradation yet. I am running an Intel 650 mhz (100 mhz FSB) with 512 meg RAM.As far as the printing goes.... On regular white paper, the image is very good, but the paper gets damp. On the photo paper, the image was very good and the paper was fine. I have not yet tried the thicker photo paper. I am printing images from a Kodak picture CD. 800k JPGs, resolution around 1200 x 960. I wouldn't say that the printed output is equivalent to the actual developed picture, but for my purposes it was close enough. And for this price, it's a good deal. There are only four cartridges for the S600. Magenta, Yellow, Cyan and Black. The Black is roughly twice the size of the other two.Overall, I would say that this printer is worth the (amount) that I paid.

источник

Аэронавт-7MICE

19.04.2002

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

First I must say that I'm an iMac user(OSX) and I was looking for a printer with a small "Footprint " since space is important to me.I'm not heavy on printing but I do run a small business from home. I must say I'm impressed with this printer.Print quality over all is very good and it IS fast in both color + black and white.The communication speed could be a bit faster(thats why I only give 4stars)but that just might be MY iMac's thing.Over all I'm HAPPY with it and it's low price.I also have the canon 670 scanner and these two work very well together.

источник

ХроноГость-7YZNJ

18.07.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

If you are in the market for an economical low cost printer, this is the one. I really like the 4 tank system that keeps your wallet happy. When I printed my first 4X6 Picture I was blown away by the great color and sharpness. This is a keeper.

источник

Аргонавт-3FLRE

04.06.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I just got this camera a couple of days ago and I love it already. The size is perfect, can fit in a pocket, small purse or pack. Picture quality is great! Good for posting on the internet or printing -- I went out and bought a new printer (the HP DeskJet 5550) and the prints are amazing! I'm putting my 35mm camera away and using the ELPH exclusively.

источник

Пульсар-7JOLT

19.08.2001

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

After years of printers - I have used quite a number from Panasonic to HP - this is the best I have ever used! I agree with the reviews about the print quality, color redering, graphics, but what has me sold is the ink supply. I have been using this printer heavily for over three months, and have yet to replace a color tank. When I bought the printer, I also bought a spare set of tanks, based on my experience with other single-cartridge color printers. The spare tanks are still in the original package! And even better, the three tanks together cost less than the single three color tank of my old printer. As for quality, I saw one review which complained about it - all I can say is to use the Canon exhange warranty and try another printer. As for myself, I am doing full-color brochures for my business, and everyone who has seen them asks which print house I used. And this is at the "normal" setting! The 45 second "warm up" is no big deal - and if gives me time to recheck things one last time, to cancel the print job when I discover that little error. The softwware support is also excellent, and the printer status monitor is better than any other I've used. Would I purchase this printer again - absolutely! Would I recommend it to a friend or relative - I have!

источник

Пульсар-2TIQN

10.07.2002

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Easy to install, friendly, and reasonably fast. Make sure to download driver update and Easy Photo software, available for free from Canon web site.

источник

Сатурниан-2IMIY

27.05.2002

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

This was a breeze to set up and the photos look great. It is a bit noisy and not quite as quick as my previous Canon but I like the control I have over options. Glad I took the advice of the reviews and purchased this S520. It is a great printer for not much money.

источник

Интеллектор-0WHAC

03.12.2001

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

The Canon S300 outperforms most printers costing twice the price. I checked out numerous models from various manufacturers and I bought the lowest priced printer of all, the S300. Text and graphic output is stunning. Plus, this printer is unbelievabley FAST! The S300 even out performs higher end models from Canon! I don't know how Canon can sell a printer of this quality for under a $(...). Some say the S300 looks ugly and boxy but I LIKE its styling.(12/27/01) A month later and this printer STILL rocks for the price. I found that the printer requires some tweaking. There are numerous color, brightness, contrast and other controls in the printer driver software. Configuring these settings AND using glossy photo paper will yield some jaw-dropping results. Text is speedy and crisp. I would buy this printer again in a heartbeat!

источник

Туманник-9XBGJ

26.10.2001

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I use this printer primarily for home. It really does what I want. Very quiet and the print quality is excellent, much better than other printers at similar price. A very important feature this printer gives you is the option to replace only cartridge that runs out of ink (don't have to buy all cartridges at once). It can print high quality photo on regular white paper, not have to print on a glossy photo paper (but not on recycled paper either!). Nicely print any object and clearly distinguish every color on photo. Want to print text or tranparencies? Don't worry, this printer will not spoil ink on your valuable documents. Highly recommend this printer to anyone interested in good printer at affordable price.

источник

Лунатик-1NYDZ

12.09.2001

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I purchased my Canon S600 about six months ago due to the inability of my old Canon BJC-620 to print without stopping or error messages. I was a little nervous to buy another Canon after my previous experience but the salesman at Best Buy told me Canon has redesigned their Printers with a new "S" series that will compete among the mid-level inkjet printers.I chose the midtrim S600 due to its price and features. This includes 4 individual ink tanks (cyan, magenta, yellow and black), and for the option to print double sided. The high level trim the S800 is more expensive to buy and uses 6 tanks which costs more. All in all my printer has performed very good.Features:5ppm B&W, 2.5ppm Color. (Based on my own experiences)4 individual Ink CartrigesOptional Double Sided PrintingBannersPostersCompatible with Macintosh and Windows

источник

Небулоид-1XUYJ

18.01.2002

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I upgraded to the S600 from the BJC-6000, and am very glad I did.There is a noticeable improvement in the quality of images, and the speed is much faster.I recently purchased a Canon PowerShot S110 Digital Elph camera, and printing images from that even on plain paper is impressive. But, on photo paper, WOW!I'm sure there are better printers out there, but for me, the S600 does the job.

источник

Показаны отзывы 6441-6488 из 7376.