Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Fujifilm Instax Mini 12

Я купил это после встречи друг с Х30 ... посмотрел на него и решила, что мне нужна без излишеств камера с фиксированным объективом, как в старые-дней (признаюсь, у меня есть Кэнон "мост камеры", который имеет зумом). Камера является радость в использовании и качество изображения будет потрясающим. Есть много изысков (несмотря на мое заявление выше) если вы хотите использовать их, а просто точки и стрелять, или использовать вручную, и вы удивитесь ли вы, глядя на ту же фотографию, вы думали, что вы взяли? (если это имеет смысл?).
в стиле ретро выглядеть и чувствовать себя очень приятно, а в сочетании с кожаный чехол восходит к Дням качества и простоты. Он тоже небольшой и легко носить с собой куда угодно, не становясь помехой.
не хватает эмоций ... удобно держать и простой в использовании, батарея держит хорошо (неделю в озерный край, и мне не нужно, чтобы зарядить - хотя я не плодовитый берущего картину), и результаты кристально чистой. Простые и интуитивные средства управления, и я люблю глаза датчик, который означает, что я могу смотреть на задний экран, но использовать видоискатель для съемки без всякой суеты (это просто изменения между двумя, когда вы поднимаете камеру к глазу - и наоборот).
как вывод выше, я не "профи" и просто принять хорошее качество "кнопки праздника" ... но в следующий раз я посетить Венецию это будет со мной!

Это первая полностью механическая камера, которую я когда-либо имел, я хотел 35мм объективы с переменным фокусным расстоянием и решил пойти до конца и купить полностью механическая камера, у него есть автоматические режимы, если это необходимо, но я хотел, проблема обучения, только за одну неделю с момента покупки Ютуб научил меня многому, и я теперь полностью комфортно в ручном режиме, ISO, диафрагма и скорость затвора можно управлять очень легко и не так трудно узнать, видоискатель режимы оптико-электронных и совместных OEVF удивительно, я узнал больше о фотографии в неделю, чем у меня за все мои 45 лет жизни и имея камеру в руки, когда я смотрел видео было отличное, качество сборки является фантастическим, вы действительно чувствуете, как будто вы могли уронить камеру и она будет работать (не рекомендуется :) ) кнопки хорошо расположены и крепкий достаточно, чтобы включить или переключиться с колебание или смещать как они все накаткой, Я не уверен, если другие камеры являются дорогой к подлинному объявление донов, так они за это Фуджи Х100Т или погода просто Фудзи, но с другой стороны есть и другие запчасти и оборудование для с аксессуарами, но это отличная камера не только для уличной фотографии, но для прогулок с семьей в местных лесах и т. д., качество объектива и камеры, не задумываясь сохранении изображения в формате JPEG и в формате RAW на карту памяти быстро, я уверен на 100% в любви с моей покупкой, ретро камеры со всеми необходимыми цифровой современный гаджет.

Quick Intro:I've had my X-S1 for several months now. All in all, its a nice little camera for the novice (like myself) who doesn't need a camera that fits in the credit card slots of your wallet. Its large, bulky, (but not unreasonably so) and feels like a real camera when you hold it.Pros:- Higher Res than Moms and Dads will ever need- Awesome Manual Zoom- Every feature I could possibly think of, and then 65 more- As durable as anyone could expect a camera to beInterlude:I really cannot understand why these consumer level cameras have so many settings and adjustments. Once I figured out that it has 6 or 7 different auto modes, each for a different context, and that between those the camera can do 95% of the work for you and take flawless photos, I lost the User's Manual.Cons:Only one worth mentioning, but it turned out to be HUGE. I wish someone would have warned me about it before I bought the camera.. but I probably would have just ignored them anyway.About a month ago its tripod tipped over and the LCD was shattered, along with the glass cover for it. My fault, I'm dumb... totally my fault... I wouldn't expect the camera to withstand that fall without damage, so nothing against Fuji here.So, I ordered one (a LCD) off of eBay for $30 from China. It arrived in a few weeks and I installed it, perfect fit, about as difficult as an iPhone LCD replacement, excellent everything, great. LCD restored. I didn't think, although I should have known, that the glass cover is not actually part of the LCD.Turns out, I cannot find that little piece of glass ANYWHERE. So, I went to Fuji's website and found the closest "Authorized Repair Whatever" and emailed them:"We do not sell parts....I would try Fuji for the part you need..their # is: (800) 659-3854."I thought he meant that he couldn't sell me the part because he'd need to be the one to install it. Nope, he can't get the part AT ALL. So, I called Fuji at the number he gave me. According to the voice menu guy, I should press option 1, then 3, if "You need to buy parts.", so I complied..The not-nice lady I spoke with, after 5 or so minutes of being on hold (not too bad) let me explain the whole thing before saying:"Yeah, we don't sell parts.. you'll have to mail that in.. let me transfer you.. "That put me on hold for about 10-15 minutes, which generally annoyed me, but whatever.So this not-nice guy took my call and let me explain what was going wrong. He then said:"Ok, the first step is to go to our website and find the 'Repair Request' form. Mail that in with your camera to the NJ repair center. You can find it on Google, just type..."Had to cut him off on the 'How to use Google speech', sorry, "Ok, so, I have to mail it in I guess.. what's that process look like? How much will this cost me?""Well, you mail it in and after the camera arrives we'll take a look at it and email you a price to fix it.", he said."So, you can't give me a ball park?", I asked."No.", he said, singularly."What's the turn around on this?", I asked."Well the time it waits for valuation varies sharply, it just depends on our workload, but once you get the valuation, approve the repair, and pay.. it takes about 10-15 business days, and we'll ship it back".I said, "You know, the little piece of glass I need is literally about a $1 problem, and I will gladly pay you 20x that, but you just described a month and a half long, expensive sounding, process. Is there no way I can just buy that little piece? It literally just snaps in!""No, can't help you there, you have to send it in."--I tried to approach this with hat in hand, Fuji did not drop the camera, nor did they say it was "droppable". So, I tried to remain courteous throughout the process.So here's the warning: If you break any part, and I mean ANY part of this camera, there is ONE place in NJ that can get you the parts, and you have to get rid of your camera for a month+ and go through all sorts of nonsense if you want it fixed.Most negative reviews for products are people talking about either really rare problems or scenarios.. or received a defective product that was promptly replaced. I usually ignore those edge cases as a personal policy. However, in my case this appears to be standard practice at Fuji.. and I imagine that at least a significant percentage of people will eventually have something on this camera break.When that happens, you're not going to be happy about what comes next...

I wanted to get to know this camera for a few weeks before posting my review. Being an enthusiast and a neophyte to the world of DSLR-style photography, I had a lot on my plate but I think I managed.I did not put this camera's capability of shooting video through its paces as I did not purchase this camera with that in mind.As other reviewers have noted, this is not a straight-up DSLR camera; the camera has a permanent lens that cannot be removed. But it sure operates like one otherwise.My serial number starts with 34A; Fujifilm is pretty much past the issue that seemed to plague early adopters with the light orbs, so don't worry about getting a bum camera.The camera comes with several handy items: A USB cable, a metal "petal-style" lens hood, a lens cap, camera strap, lens cap, CD-ROM with software (that you might not need; see below), battery charger and battery (NP-95, if you're considering this camera and want extra batteries). Best of all, it comes with a printed manual (!), explaining in full detail each function of the camera.The camera is somewhat hefty at a little over 2 pounds (with battery and SD card). The camera is very nice to hold with its rubberized-like exterior. The lens has a ribbed rubber grip and is very smooth to protract and retract.Almost every function you would want is located around the camera's rear monitor and the shutter button on the front. There are two function buttons that can be assigned to desired functions (such as image quality and digital zoom). However, I wished I could assign functions such as image stabilization to one of the function buttons since I switch between handheld and tripod use a lot. Otherwise, I have to dig (not too deep) into the camera's menu to turn it on and off.The monitor (and/or electronic viewfinder) can be customized to suit your needs. Want to put a "rule of thirds" grid on the monitor? You can do that. The monitor can be pulled out a little but and angled (e.g., 90 degrees facing up).While one could just start shooting pictures right away with the camera at its default "AUTO" mode, the power lies in the camera's manual or semi-manual modes. However, I would caution first-time users to get familiar with terminologies such as aperture and shutter speed before diving into these modes. A little work comes with its own set of rewards.The X-S1 can shoot RAW (like other manufacturers, Fujifilm employs its own RAW file format, which is RAF). A RAW image is essentially a digital negative of the image. With it, you can change things such as exposure, color balance, etc. post-shot in the appropriate software, all non-destructively. The X-S1 comes with software on CD-ROM that can work with these files but the biggest bonus is that if you already work with software such as Adobe Photoshop CC, Bridge CC or Lightroom 5, RAF support is built right in (down to being able to use the film simulation modes the X-S1 uses, like Provia or Velvia). Just bring your RAW/RAF files in and get cracking.So you're probably wondering: How is the image quality? For the price I paid ($350 USD plus tax), I would say I got my money's worth and then some. I've uploaded a couple images here (look for username "Iacobus" in the customer images). Supposedly, the X-S1 was discontinued, hence the bargain I got but as of this review, the camera is up to $530 USD. Would I pay that much? Probably. I don't know of any "bridge" camera of this type that shoots RAW of this quality. There's Fujiflm's own FinePix series but those cameras' sensors are smaller. (1/2" versus the 2/3" of the X-S1.)Since the camera's dimensions are big, I would suggest a nice, padded camera bag of some sort or a DSLR holster bag. Do NOT pay attention to the "frequently bought together" link and its suggestions. The bag they suggest is too small. You want something like Case Logic's DSLR Camera Holster TBC-406 (and even then, you won't have room for everything; it's just a holster). Also, get a big SD Card; the X-S1 does not come with one. It has internal memory but it's not very big at all, especially if you shoot in RAW.So, in summary: Great camera, even greater if you can get it at the price I paid.UPDATED EDIT (04/16/2014): The X-S1 is back down to $350 USD! An absolute bargain considering features and build quality (the camera is made in Japan).

Я лейкой м3, Никон D40, в компании Ricoh GRD в IV и Рикох гр владельца. Любитель уличной фотографии и тех, кто редко смотрит на то, что фотографии, которые он принимает, потому что я держать мою камеру на расстоянии вытянутой руки и талия высота должна быть более сдержанной. Так что 1 из 15 фотографий стоит сохранять. Это только мое 50-летие и мне показалось, что новый фотоаппарат с бюджетом до € 1400. Начал смотреть на Сони А7, но не могу держать и фотографировать одной рукой. Также принято решение о том, что я не хочу носить линзы везде. Так я посмотрел на LX100 и RX100 III степени. Оба были очень хорошими камерами, легко держать в одной руке и зум-объективы тоже загрузиться. Но я читал комментарий эксперта, который предложил LX100 нигде не было так хорошо, как моя Г, когда он пришел к качеству изображения. Зачем вам камера, которая ничем не лучше, чем уже существующий? Зачем вам камера, которая такого же размера? Эта информация повергла меня в новый поиск орбите. Я начал изучать Никон D5500 и D7100. Не для разового применения силы и необходимости носить линзы, но у меня есть целая куча красивых линзы, которые я мог бы использовать из моего и D40. Однажды днем, будучи на конференции в Брюсселе, я написал Моей жене, чтобы рассказать ей, что я собирался купить D7100. Я зашел на Amazon и как будто моя рука была одержима, я смотрел его нажмите на Фуджи Х100Т. Упал обратно в свое кресло и почувствовал, как волна счастья С моему удивлению выбор. Я люблю эту камеру? Это как мой четвертый ребенок. Она везде ездит со мной, делает снимки такого качества, я не взял раньше - хотя ч/б не лучше, что мой гр - и чувствует, как лайка. Теплый лейки. Я в восторге. Я знаю, что это не очень технический комментарий, но я оставлю это для специалистов. Это отзыв о том, как одни оттенки кожи заставили меня влюбиться в фотографию сначала.

Ok, I did months of research to find out which camera would give me pretty much what I wanted, and if it didn't I would learn to work with it. I chose the X-S1. It had to be ordered from another related store, as the NH camera store didn't have one available. The store owner indicated that he was very happy with Fujifilm's customer service and they go out of the way to make their customers happy. Upon paying for the purchase, I noticed the camera serial number; it started with 14. From research on line, an unhappy customer from Amazon indicated that he had received his X-S1 and there was a sensor issue; any serial number less than serial number beginning with 22, had this issue and he was told by Fujifilm that Amazon shouldn't have sold that camera at all. The manager said that I had a 1 year warranty so not to worry if there was a problem. I was skeptical, but thought that maybe not all sensors were bad, and I would give it a try.Upon getting it home, I discovered a required clip to hold the battery into the battery charger, was missing and couldn't be charged (without being creative and finding a way to do it). I called and was told that a replacement would be sent. In sending emails to Fujifilm and calling them directly, I got more info on the sensor issue and replicated the problem indicating I had a bad sensor. I contacted my store again, and told them of the problem. They called customer service and was told that I should not have been sold this camera. He then contacted the local rep for a replacement. Week after week I called to find out when my replacement would come in. The manager indicated that he had talked to the rep, he had left numerous messages for the rep, and he was then calling daily and leaving messages for the rep. Finally after 3 weeks of waiting (and it could have been 4), I returned the camera for refund, and will NEVER buy a Fujifilm related product again.The above being said, I have the following comments on the camera itself. I am coming from a Canon Powershot Pro 1, and prior to that, SLRs cameras with multiple lenses,etc. (I have 49 years of experience with cameras) The clip for the battery charger is required because Fujifilm is using the same battery charger for two different sized batteries. The clip is easily lost, and the charger is not a nice convenient plug into the wall unit as Canon has. You will have have to carry around several feet of cord for the charger - again, unlike that small compact feature from Canon that will fit into a pocket or camera bag and take up little room.I do miss the fully articulating lcd screen as I really use the view finder more, and since the screen cannot be flipped around, the screen contacts one's face and needs frequently cleaning. (would be an issue for other cameras with the tilting lcd screen)The macro feature seems to be similar to what is currently available on cameras now - must be in wide angle to get close and to focus properly, which means small items like minerals, coins, stamps, insects, etc. you are right on top of the item, casting a show, and more importantly, a small item with a wide angle of 24mm is still a small item. My previous camera could still zoom in when in Macro or Super Macro. (perhaps this is the unfortunate norm now)The images are supposed to have really good resolution at lower ISOs, but when I looked at photos I had taken, they didn't seem to be as sharp as the Canon which was only 8MP.Unless I overlooked settings in the software, when downloading photos, it placed them into a folder with the download date, not when the photos were taken, which was my preference. I also had multiple applications opening for the download of photos - the true app for download, but also a direct connection to the camera would open up allowing download from there too. Unlike other software that I had seen, I was not able to select photos to download - it was either none or all. Also, deleting the photos from the camera was not what I was expecting - the software didn't allow me to go and view the pics on the camera and delete all or just what I wanted. The option for download was download all images (nothing selectable) and leave the images on the camera, or download images and delete them from the camera as well. Personally, I like to insure the photos have been downloaded prior to deleting any images. I learned this in the past - don't delete until one insures the images were downloaded and are fine... (perhaps the software could be tweaked to get what I wanted, but I did look and spend some time, but never found the toggles or selections for these features)One of the major issues I found with the camera, is that I do frequently point the camera straight down towards the ground, because I am standing over something that I want to photograph. The lense has an issue, as when you are pointing it down, the lense barrel starts to move towards the ground due to gravity and therefore, it is zooming in wh

The X-S1I only write this review to enlighten some people about what this Camera really is, and why I bought it. Take this writing for what you believe it to be.As a Photographer for over 40yrs, and a never ending Student of the Art, the X-S1 intrigued me from the moment I first became aware of it in Feb. of 2011. In my lifetime, I have had the good fortune to own some pretty fine equipment. It does not matter what the brands of those tools were, nor does it matter how much gear I had. I just know that I was really tired of the amount of gear I had. So I decided to read all the information that I could get my hands about the Fuji X-S1. At first, like many other great cameras that have come along, the X-S1 had some early troubles. There was a sensor problem, which caused white (Or bright) Orbs to appear on some Photos. That and a few other problems have long since been corrected by Fuji. In my research of this camera I spoke with lots of owners of this camera. I did not find a single "Knowledgeable" owner who did not love it! Not one! I downloaded the User's Manual from Fuji in March of 2011. I read, and reread this document until I knew the camera inside and out. This is something that is a pet peeve of mine. Why do people buy nice/complex things and never read the User Manual? Why? This is something that a long time ago, my Flight Instructor made very clear to me. Now really, would you fly a plane you did not know anything about? If your answer yes...well, forget buying this camera. Actually, this is a very easy camera to become very easy to use. Of course if you want to, you can put it full auto mode and get very good photos right out of the box. But...if you are a serious shooter, or want to become one, this is the camera for you. As I said earlier, I have had some pretty nice gear in my life time, but I can't think of one that equals this one. Yes, I mean that! There are those that think that "Bigger & Most Expensive" is the way to go. Believe me, it isn't. If I could go back in time, and could have this camera, I would be forever happy. Ok...a few words about this beast.Build quality is solid, better than any bridge camera on the market, guaranteed.Controls: Intuitive, fast, and precise. The Manual Zoom is nothing but PURE SILK.Auto ISO'S of 400, 800, 1600, 3200Manual ISO's of 100 - 12,800All the standard modes; M, AP, SP, P, AUTOExcellent Manual ControlsPlus; 3 Custom Settings of C1, C2, C3. For those that don't know what that means, I will tell you in simple words. If you would like to go out and photo bids in flight, you could set the C1 Mode as this: (ISO Auto 400) ( Focus: Hard) (Burst (fps) at the frames per sec you wish.) (Exp. Spot) (Focus: Area) (Film Simulation: Velvia) and whatever others your tastes might be. Select Custom Settings on the "Shooting Menu", select "C1", and the camera will be set to this when you rotate the Mode Dial to C1. If you like to shoot Macro shots, then program C2 for all the setting you prefer for shooting Macro Shots, select Custom Settings from the "Shooting Menu", select C2 and click OK. If you see something when you're out shooting, and it dictates a Macro Mode, just spin the Mode Dial to C2 and your ready to shoot. You also have C3, for another type of shooting. You don't have to reset your camera constantly. A Blessing for those of us old timers let me tell you!!Several other dedicated button for things like; AE, AF, ISO, WB, Picture Playback and Delete. Dedicated Buttons, no having to go into a Menu and look for them.Two Fn Buttons. Fn1 and Fn2. These work like the C1, C2, C3, as mentioned above except they are limited to a choice of 3 options for each button. Amazing, just 3 options each! What is one to do with only 3 options? LOLVideo: Stereo HD Video, with all the bells and whistles. (320 fps) You will be impressed! Just "RTFB". I'm not a Video Man, but it is impressive.Image Quality: In my opinion, as good as it gets. This reminds me of the two guys arguing who's Stereo has the highest frequency response. Can you hear over 16,000 Hz? I don't think so. I could go on the "Tech Trail" here but I refuse to do that. Why? Because it's pointless. Most of the arguments I hear about some of the hot topics are by some people who "Shadow Box" real well, but have never been in a ring. I really avoid things these days. It's just a waste of time!The Lens: For the record, the lens used in this camera is a spinoff of the same lenses that Fuji uses for their big broadcast lenses that you enjoy when you watch coverage of the big events such as The Olympic Games, Golfing Events, and "Monday Night Football as well. And it is made by the same technicians. Even the lens coatings are the same. That's Cristal Clear to me!How fast is the recovery time on the Shutter, how fast dose the Flash Recycle, how fast is the Auto Focus ? Do you really want those numbers? They're out there, look them up. But the simple answer is this: "They are faster than Ali". What does that tell y

Я получил это в качестве замены для х100, что я потерял. Х100 был отличный фотоаппарат. Я использовал его, чтобы взять отличные качественные снимки оснастки и некоторых уличной фотографии (которые он превосходит по). Серия X100 очень хорошо сделаны и легко использовать в полностью автоматическом режиме. Идеально подходит для тех, кто хочет стильную камеру, чтобы снимать случайные кадры с.<бр /><бр />Х100Т такая же камера, как х100. Изображения немного лучше, и изображение больше напоминает традиционные изображения пленки при увеличении ее. Автофокус теперь мгновенный на Х100Т и прекрасно работает. Мое личное мнение заключается в том, что система меню лучше на Х100, чем Х100Т, но это дело вкуса, я полагаю.<БР />
я была поражена, когда я потерял мой х100 так радует, когда я узнал, что он был застрахован и я мог бы заменить его ... с другой х100 (хотя и более новой модели Т).

хорошо

Я недавно обновлен с x100s и купил Х100Т в серебре. В то же время я продал все мои зеркальной техники, как это было пылятся, пока я имел 'Ы'. ( единственное, что я скучаю от SLR Kit-это канон 10-22мм для широкоугольных снимков.)<бр /><бр />изменения в новой камере, небольшие, но значительные. Лучшим для меня является то, что точечный экспозамер теперь следит за точку фокусировки и точку фокусировки можно управлять с помощью джойстика. это делает кадрирование и экспозицию таким образом гораздо быстрее.<БР />
В классической обстановке хром JPEG-это прекрасный. 1/3 останавливается на кольцо диафрагмы Великой.<бр /><бр />кнопка и вопрос был перемещен в такое место, где кожаный чехол Фудзи не загромождать его.<БР />
для передачи WiFi и приложение для дистанционного управления камерой, но я не использую их много.<бр /><бр />срок службы батареи по-прежнему средний, но я всегда ношу с собой пару запасных.<бр /><бр />качество фото-это все-таки круто прямо из камеры.<бр /><бр />его удивительно, как быстро привыкаешь к ручной зум (на самом деле ближе или дальше от темы.)<БР />
я беру его почти везде со мной.<БР />
я не могу рекомендовать его достаточно высоко. Его удивительно, как быстро привыкаешь к ручной зум (на самом деле ближе или дальше от предмета.)

Идеально подходит для уличной фотографии; если вы установите фокусировку в ручной (не автоматический медленный) затем вы получите, чтобы запечатлеть тот миг, который делает отличные фото.

FUJIFILM X-S1I bought a Fuji X-S1 about two months ago as something of a retirement gift to myself as a go anywhere camera. I have had 4 previous Fujifilm digital cameras S4000, S4800, S5200 and S2980.The main reason you buy a Fujifilm camera is because of the stunning colour quality. It is just amazing that for as little as $200 Fuji will sell you a, "stack 'em high, sell 'em cheap" camera that gives such wonderful colour representations. Scenery is great, portraits are great, ocean is great; contrast, tonality and colour gradient are great. But of course with such a "limited" camera you need to know what you are doing.Being an older guy, I cut my photographic teeth on 35 mm film Nikon SLRs and have a cupboard full of them with lens and all sorts of attachments.Firstly don't be sucked in by negative comparisons you read with DSLR technology because the Fujifilm X-S1 is not a DSLR; it is like comparing apples and oranges. The Fujifilm X-S1 is a single lens extreme telephoto (24 mm to 624 mm focal length(X26)) bridge camera. If you really want a "full frame" DSLR and all it can do then cough up the thousands of dollars and start buying a whole suite of lenses; that'll cost you a damn sight more than the $800 approximate cost of the Fujifilm X-S1.Personally I'm so electronic these days I hardly print any photos any more preferring to view them on my computer slideshow however my printed photo from this camera was just terrific.The lens on this camera is manual, "zoomed" by twisting the barrel with your fingers but it is a delightful piece of kit to use and reasonably fast too being F2.8 to F5.6 at 624mm focal length. Wow!!! ( I have some F1.4 primary lenses but they cost me about $1000 years ago ...just for the lens. Do you really want to shell out that kind of money for an extra 2 stops???). This lens also has a very nice manual focus ring with a button electronic over-ride in case time runs short.Some people whinge about the picture quality?? Just check out Tony Sturn's images on the internet and you'll be less concerned. The pictures of birds, foxes and squirrels taken by this guy with his X-S1 are just stunning. With a little care, photographic knowledge and this camera you could take pictures like that too.I bought this camera because I used to love using Velvia film and this camera emulates Provia, Velvia and Astia films for those of you old enough to know what I'm talking about. The emulations are just fantastic!!! Once again the Fuji colours are just brilliant.The lesser Fuji cameras have dropped the lens thread and that is a real disappointment because as an ex 35 mm SLR user I have many Cokin filters and gadgets to thread onto cameras. The Fuji X-S1 however does have a thread for filters. So should you decide to buy one get a UV(o) filter put it on your camera and presto your pictures are going to look a whole lot better even before you press the shutter button. Also protects your lens from scratches and such so leave it on. I also use a polarising filter a lot as in Australia we can have some pretty harsh sun light so a circular polarising filter is also a good thing to have.There are several films on YOUtube about the Fuji X-S1 and a look at these is probably a good idea.Some people have mentioned that the feature set on this camera is very good; very good is an under-statement... it is just fantastic. All sorts of modifications can be done on this camera, all the programme usuals plus colour modifications, film emulation, SLR portrait emulation, various panoramas up to 360 degrees using the camera horizontal or vertical, various bracketing modes, best picture from bursts with variable before and after how many shots etc etc. White balance is a special treat in this camera and I'm not exhausting the facilities on this camera. It is a fun camera to explore for all our techno geeks.Some have commented that image stablisation is not that great. But this camera goes out to 624 mm (35mm equivalent) focal length and with intelligent digital zoom (which is really good) goes out to 1248 mm (35 mm equivalent) zoom. Anybody who knows anything about photography is not going to do that hand held!!! You need a tripod for that kind of stuff whether you have 35 mm SLR, DSLR or a Fuji X-S1. So commentators.... let's not be idiotic, make use of your tripods. I took a picture of the moon on X2 intelligent digital zoom and fair dinkum, craters and everything are visible in the image but of course, I used a tripod. (HINT: If you want to photograph the moon don't do it when it is full moon, the shape called, "gibbous" and "quarter" is probably the best).I believe that Fujifilm is on to a real winner with this camera concept and as time passes and the few little "bugs" are ironed out this camera, should it become a series (i.e. X-S2, X-S3 etc.), up-ing the pixel count (currently at 12 MP on the X-S1) and maybe even a few more "bells and whistles" or an up-ed "EXR" facility could be a real DSLR killer. (RIP Niko

I will say a few things. Build quality is outstanding. No doubt about that.I have had it a couple of weeks and used it under a good many situations to get a feel for it. I really like it. But let me get right to the "negatives". But please understand that all cameras are trade offs of one thing for another. There are far more positives than negatives.1. Image quality.. People have a strange idea of what image quality is and they toss the term around. I think a lot of people who have knocked the image quality and said it is no better than an average point and shoot have not explored all the settings because it is far more than point and shoot image quality. There is a lot you can change in terms of setting and how you shoot. So it is possible to get great images and they are far more than point and shoot images. The images could be sharper under some circumstances but in others it is really good. The thing is that for the most part the average person is not going to notice the difference. The image quality issue is VERY dependent on the circumstances. The macro is excellent. Portrait is good and acceptable but a G 12 would do better. Outdoor is just fine even with lower light and even at 600mm zoom I was pleasently suprised. Also there are different modes and image quality will be effected by those. But IF you really want to pick... the lens could be sharper BUT the sharpness will not be an issue for most people and it would not be noticed until you blow up a picture. Funny how people that don't shoot much and cannot compose often will get hung up on stats. For the average person looking for nice pictures with advanced possibilities sharpness in this camera is not something to get hung up on. A person should be improving other factors in their photography and not obsessing over pixels in situations where you would forget about them anyway.2. Autofocus. This could be better and snappier. It works but it is not up to the standard of the camera. It can be skittish3. Ease of use and user enjoyment.. Well it is really really a pleasure to use without a doubt. It has many preset programs in it that could really help a person get nice picture especially if that person is looking for better than point and shoot pictures but does not want to fumble with an SLR or lenses. It bothers me to see people with disposible income and these expensive SLRS waltzing around snapping without a clue. They would be better with this. Hey, if you really have the skills to negotiate and manipulate an SLR in a very versitile way then that is a good thing but IF you want to drop the ego and don't care about impressing anyone when you are not a highly skilled photographer you are better with this. Yeah this camera is a pleasure to use and so versitile. It will accomadate most all situations on a family trip or day of taking photos of animals or whatever...The camera has lots of great features and is laid out well. The viewfinder is electronic and really great. The LED screen is sharp enough and great.Here is the bottom line. On one hand you have SLRs. We all know that their images are great. But lets take the average person what wants better than average pictures and wants to be creative. They may not want to take the kids to the park or the zoo with an SLR and a bunch of lenses. They may not want to be changing lenses. The reality is that if all they are going to do is snap then get a regular and save some money. If the snapper is wanting sharper images and has money get a G 15 or something. Or take an SLR with a 50mm lens. But let's take the person that takes the family on a trip. They go to the zoo. Well they want to snap the kids in front of a zebra. But then they want a close up of an animal in the distance. Then they see a flower and want a really nice macro. Then they want to do a portrait. Then this and then that at different lightings and distances. This camera will do that. Then it gets to be the end of the day and lighting is getting lower but you see a seagul in the distance and you want a zoom at 620mm. Well this camera will pull that off fairly well. So it is very versitile. Yes, you will suffer some image sharpness under many circumstances but as I have said most of the time that is a non issue and will not be perceived. To overcome that on your trip you need an SLR or smaller version of one with all the lenses. It is your choice.I would say that for a person that wants more than a point and shoot but does not want to go to SLR with all the hassels and benefits then this is a great thing. A person that has become desireous to expand beyond their point and shoot and get infinately better pictures and opportunities will like it. A kids birtday party, trip to the zoo, vacation or.. You see some kind of bird on your lawn and want a real close picture. Well you won't get it with the average point and shoot and with an SLR the bird may be gone by the time you change lenses.

Я был сыт по горло с ношением линз вокруг, больше надоело менять их ... я хотела бы вернуться к старой доброй фотографии, где я могла бы камера готова для действий во все времена. Я езжу на мотоциклах, тысячи миль каждый год по всей Европе, даже дальше. Я организую туры на мотоциклах, я иду на холмы и на берегу реки ... я хотел хорошую камеру лучшего качества. Х100Т это и многое другое. Я не собираюсь в педвузе камеры, есть и другие, более квалифицированные. Это не фотоаппарат для полный Ньюби в фотографии, это не установленные на авто интеллект' вид камеры, вы должны думать с этой Фуджи зум с ног, возможно, немного знаю о фотографии, но это требует взлома фотографий, дает прекрасные результаты ... я очень впечатлен.<БР />
не перегружайте его с Гизмо, дополнительный винт на линзы или как! ОК, возможно, бленда объектива, если нужно, но купить Фуджи бленда, не дешево, но тогда это было не дешево это была камера? Я не была в ситуации, когда мне нужна бленда еще, я просто изменил мою позицию фракции ... сортировки. Пусть она будет простой, использовать его и наслаждаться. Может быть, кожаный чехол Fuji для ношения через плечо, или небольшой сумке камеры, так что вы можете принять его к немедленному использованию. Качество и обработка Фуджи Х100Т так же хорошо, как он получает в моей книге.<БР />
я просто люблю его.

Я очень редко Райт обзор, но если вы смотрите на это вы, очевидно задумываетесь о покупке этой камеры. Да, это очень дорого. Да, он только имеет фиксированное фокусное расстояние, но когда вы держите его в руках, чтобы сфотографировать она переносит вас в другую эпоху! Я в определенном возрасте, когда я помню, какой должна быть настоящая камера. Это реальные камеры.м. Результаты невероятно, особенно если вы снимаете в черно-белом. Когда я был моложе, я имел Зоркий дальномером и этот Фуджи напоминает мне Зоркий. Это хорошо построены и чувствует себя твердым в руке. Это легко настроить себя фотографировать очень быстро, потому что все элементы управления находятся под рукой. Есть, конечно, меню, но appature и скорости выбираются с помощью традиционных методов. Если вы думаете о получении этой маленькой камеры. Думаю, не больше. Вы будете в восторге от момента, когда вы открываете коробку.

Очень рад, что вы видите на фото, вы получите, (и в классический хром-отличный вариант). Возьмем снова Корнуолл в этом году сделать еще несколько фотографий с побережья.

Любовь ручное управление и качество изображения. Бедняги лейки М9. Некоторые элементы управления немного неудобный и жизнь батареи (особенно при съемке в RAW) является довольно плачевны. Купите 3-4 дополнительных батарей, Если вы снимаете в RAW. Фокус-это все-таки немного медленнее, чем хотелось бы.<БР />
я владел М6 обратно в тот же день, и что камеры действительно просто "исчезнут" и пусть Вам сосредоточиться на изображении. Я все равно возиться с этим немного не в разы, а иногда пропустить картинку, я знаю, что я бы получил с Leica!

UPDATE DECEMBER 2013: 4 starsI bought a Nikon D3200 with 18-55mm in early 2013. I hardly ever use it. I usually don't bother carrying both, and I usually get the X-S1. The zoom of the X-S1 has more reach and my wife likes that. The colors of the X-S1 are better in my eyes. I could put more efforts in the Nikon and might be able to get colors I would like more. But the colors from the Fujifilm were always great in my eyes, with no need to tweak anything.I had the sensor in the X-S1 replaced (for the so-called orb-problem). The replacement also included the lens. Overall, I preferred the camera with the old sensor. In my eyes, the auto-exposure was better in my first sample and the zoom was more "tight".Still an intersting camera, currently at a bargain price.----------------------------------------------------------INITIAL REVIEW: May 21, 2012: 3 stars:Disclaimer: English is not my native language. If anything "sounds" odd, it may be a translation mistake. Sorry for that. More about me. I don't postprocess at all. I mainly wanted a camera with a good viewfinder (disappointment), a sharp 5x zoom (or higher) with no front/back focusing issues (disappointment with sharpness), great colors and exposure from Fuji (satisfied).The bottom line for the X-S1 is probably that I may chose to keep it and not return it. Yet, it is a camera that disappointed me in a lot of areas, and which is generally bellow what I expected. It is certainly capable of taking good pictures (though not very detailed ones). It is certainly fun (if you learn to live with a number of glitches). It could simply have been so much better with a better viewfinder (more details and less freeze please), a sharper lens (less range and more sharpness please) and a better user interface.Pros:* Feels just right (weight, build, size)* Silky zooming* Overall colors and dynamic range* Very versatile lens (24mm, macro, 135+ mm)* Pivoting robust external LCD (Rolleiflex like)* Face detection, AF, AE* Instant review in viewfinder (sharpness and contrast adequate, instantly available)* 1/1000s flash synchronization speed* Ability to work in complete silence (shutter and silent lens/AF)* Video and live view on external screen with decent AF* Almost cheap* Viewfinder makes framing somehow pleasurable* Somehow protected from dust on sensor (and certainly on non-existing translucent mirror)* Fast burst (though see bellow), multiexposure noise reduction, panorama* Most of the cameras/lenses I consider as alternatives will be replaced/introduced later this year, and are significantly more expensive, while the X-S1 is available now.Cons* Poor lens sharpness* Poor viewfinder (sharpness in shooting mode, freezes)* Average viewfinder (contrast in shooting mode)* No live feed in display when shooting bursts* Very deceiving interface* No real continuous AF* Slow operation (fast AF + freeze = slow operations)* Slow "sharpening" in PLAYBACK* White orbs, though they are rare* Zoom sag, though I don't know if it has an impact* Blue haze/flare facing strong light, though it may be only slightly worse than many other lensesOpinion about the X-S1 - Why I feel it is a lovely but very deceiving camera.Presentation following the topics in the official catalog available from fujifilm.com, at [...] .So, let's go through the marketing brochure (see reference to page number before my comments) with some positive and some negative comments.p. 1/9. The camera feels great in my hands. I like the "form factor", the shape of the grip, the weight.p. 2/9. Lens. I like 24mm wide (35mm eq.). I like having a tele of at least 150-200mm (35mm eq.). I certainly don't expect 624mm but why not.p. 3/9. "Exceptional resolution" (p.3) ? Well, nothing to write home about in my experience. My F31fd was certainly way sharper. My Panasonic TZ7 is most probably sharper as well.p. 4/9. "624mm 26x zoom. Telephoto shots without fear of blur". Well, the image stabilization is probably ok, but not magic. Check the picture on that page of the marketing brochure, it has a 1/800 sec shutter speed indeed. Unlike the TZ7, in some cases, it takes a couple of seconds after you stop framing/panning before the image stops moving due to the IS.p. 5/9. "Super macro." Not tested much but it gave me a very good impression.Check the pivoting external LCD on p.5. It pivots easily. It is sturdy. The camera is easy to control with the LCD oriented upwards, or downwards raised at arms length.p. 6/9. "Feel of precision zoom control". The zoom ring is indeed smooth and precise. As good as most zooms, even on SLRs.p. 7/9"Super EBC". "Reduces ghosting and flare". Well, when facing the sun/sky in high-contrast situations, it is not uncommon with my X-S1 to end up with some sort of blue haze. I feel that other cameras/lenses deal better with such difficult circumstances."EVF" "1.440.000-dot resolution". The image is large but, you only get the full resolution in PLAYBACK mode, if ever. In shooting mode, you don't get the full resolutio

Превосходная камера для съемки семейных торжеств, стрит-фото, и общие поездки.
и никаких вычислений редактирование / фотоателье требуется. Производит отличные снимки прямо из камеры, особенно в семье, вечеринки, обеды и так далее.

I wasn't even looking for a camera to replace my nearly 5 year old Panasonic FZ-18 which I still like. Somehow I stumbled across the Fujifilm X-S1 (I think it was an email from Amazon). When I learned it had a large (for a point and shoot) 2/3" sensor, 26x zoom going from an extra wide 24mm equiv. efl out to 624mm, and was selling for $399, it sure got my attention. I read all the reviews I could find, here on Amazon, B&H Photo, and numerous professional reviews (mostly from Great Britain). Most of the reviews were highly favorable. The only criticisms I noted were: the size and weight, sometimes faulty autofocus, and lack of image sharpness when viewed at 100%.I agree with most of those criticisms. It's as big as a lower end DSLR, and feels even heavier than it's listed 33 ounces. Most of the weight seems to be in the lens, so I had to revert to holding it like an SLR, cradling it in my left hand while steadying it with my right hand. Having said that, I did consider getting a DSLR (Canon T3i) with a wide range zoom lens (18-250mm). But that option, besides the much higher price tag, is even heavier, plus it provides less zoom range (and the lens is slower).As for the autofocus, it occasionally misses, but no more often than my Panasonic. The vast majority of time, it gets it right, and it's instantaneous. The camera overall is very responsive, much more so than my Panasonic. It is a pleasure to use.In terms of image quality, the colors are great, the images are sharp at normal viewing sizes. At 100%, which is poster size, yes, it does seem to be less sharp than my other cameras. But if you compared the images of all my cameras at the same size, I bet they would be similarly sharp. So I'm not really complaining here. I should add that in terms of image noise, this Fuji blows away the Panasonic. On that camera, I could see chroma noise at ISO 100 and I was reluctant to go above ISO 200. On the Fuji, I don't hesitate to go up to ISO 400, and even at ISO 800, the image is very good (just looks grainy at full size).Using the camera is a pleasure. The EVF is the best I've used (my 3rd camera with one). As already mentioned, it's very responsive. I really like having dedicated buttons for most functions, minimizing the need to use the menu. I prefer a manual zoom to a motorized one, giving me more precise control over framing. Incidentally, Fuji may have tweaked the zoom mechanism; mine is not all that smooth and it binds slightly at the long end. On the other hand, it's rock solid with no hint of creep.For $299 ($349 selling price-$50 gift certificate) it's a LOT of camera for the money. I definitely recommend it.

Фантастическая камера стоит каждого пенни

Хорошо построен светосильные объектив камеры, почти карманным. Радость в использовании.

Хорошая, лучшая камера на планете. Перейти к Nikon D300 с, это единственная камера, что мне сейчас нужно.

Невероятные