Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Fujifilm Instax Mini 12

A lot of people have compared this camera to DSLR cameras and given it bad ratings in the past - this was at a time when this camera was selling for over $600. But, one must not lose sight of the fact that this was and is a bridge camera. I got this camera for under $400, and for this price, it beats all other bridge cameras hands down, when it comes to image quality and features. The look and feel of the unit is purposeful and elegant, and the build quality is excellent and at par with mid-range DSLRs. It has a 40% bigger sensor than most other bridge cameras in the price range, which results in excellent image quality. With a wide aperture of f/2.8, as against f/3.5 found in most other bridge superzooms, one can get good shallow depth of field and macro shots. The lens system is decent and gives acceptable images at full-zoom, but I would not recommend going over 14x if quality is an issue. The features can be easily accessed, thanks to sensibly laid out controls. Though the camera weighs close a kilogram, it feels very good in the hand. I strongly recommend this camera to anyone looking to buy a camera with good image quality, but can't afford a DSLR (if you're okay with the bulk and lack of insane 50x-60x zoom-levels found on some newer superzooms).The newer models (SN: 23XXXXX or newer) do not seem to have issues with lens droop and orbs, like the older ones did.

Got two of these and a charger so can keep my camera on the go. Seems to last a lot longer than the original battery. Not had to recharge yet!

I bought this kit to support my new FujiFilm FinePix XP200 Underwater HD camera.

The batteries themselves are form factor clones for the venerable KLIC-7004 cells first used in the Kodack playsport, the first underwater simple camera. However they hold more power (4.1Wh vs. 3.4Wh) than the original KLIC07004. The battery which shipped with the camera was an exact clone of the KLIC-7004 with an equal power rating.

These newer batteries yield longer life and I rarely have to change them during a typical day of taking pictures at family events.

The Charger is one of the major bonuses in that I can always top up my batteries and carry spares when I leave the house. In my opinion this is an essential accessory to this or any digital camera.

The only problem with this was that the charger did not work properly; since I could charge them in my camera I didn't make a big issue out of it. The batteries after having used them for some time now don't hold the charge as well as the original battery (a different brand) that came with my camera.

Wow. Item just arrived (very quickly) and the little package is very impressive. I look forward to trying these batteries and will report if there are any problems.

I like the camera and have taken a few photos with real clear pictures. Nice camera. Quick shipping by seller. Thanks

awesome job guys...the charger is better than the OE... the battery is an exact fit...good looking out with the extras - the tripod is cool...package arrived ahead of schedule - less than a week...great product at a ridiculous low price with blazing fast shipment -
***that's what's up***

Camera fits in well and room for batteries. Rain cover very useful. For the price this product is very good value. Really leased

This is the best bargain we have ever gotten. We wanted to take this camera on vacation to Mexico because I was afraid my $800 DSLR would go "missing". This little Fujifilm worked perfectly, took great pictures, had a long lasting battery, and suited us right down to the ground. I'm greatly pleased with this item.

After being more or less satisfied with the Fuji SL300 I purchased from Amazon, I wanted something more versatile. I ran all the webs for a better Fuji Camera. Im not a pro so a dslr was not in the cards. I am not able to purchase other lenses for a dslr so the next best thing was the Fuji X-S1. As close to pro as I wanted to be. I received it in pristine condition and with serial #33 so I know it was after 2012. The pictures this takes are fantastic. The menu is easy to use. It is a manual zoom unlike the motorized zoom on the SL300. Im getting used to it so far. It will do everything that I want a camera to do. Two things tho: Most of the other cameras that I researched from other manufacturers seem small, fragile and toy like. This Fuji is huge and solid. It wont fit in your pocket. The minute you pick it up, you can feel its quality. Worth every penny, and its MADE IN JAPAN and not friggiin China!

A really, really good super zoom type camera!Fast accurate focus, occasional missed focus, but easy to tell in the great viewfinder, and easy to just shoot again.Lens is sharp and high quality.Zoom and manual focus rings are smooth and easy!A great electronic view finder. Unbelievable at this price point. Large and bright and easy to use with auto switching between the screen( very nice also) and the evf.The lens is amazing, sharp throughout it's 24mm to 624mm range!A nice and sharp macro lens also, with focus up to 1cm away! Really!I have a 33A serial number and it is a perfect version of Fujifilm's intent for this camera.Nice 2/3rds type CMOS sensor, very good higher ISO results in a super zoom class camera!Perfect for outdoors activity and very usable in indoor circumstances also!Best super zoom ever made by Fujifilm and one of the best, period.

Charger works as advertised. The batteries seem fine; we have not used them much in the field yet, but they charge up, the camera powers up normally and shows a fully charged battery. Given the the price would be reasonable for the charger alone, how could we complain?

I picked this camera up twice and sold or returned it both times. I was wanting something with both great telephoto reach and a nice size sensor. But this thing is a solid chunk. It's far larger and heavier than my Nikon D5200. Plus it's been knocking around for a few years, the technology has fallen behind. Bottom line is, it stayed in the camera bag. With a 24mp camera the crop factor makes up for the lack of zoom on the longest lens I can afford for my Nikon. I sold this and got the Sony WX350 for $200 on Ebay. It goes out to 500mm and it miniscule. The sensor is smaller but the images are still great because the tech has moved it up a notch. Plus with 20.4 MP I don't loose anything on telephoto reach because of the cropping of the larger image. I wanted to like it.

these batteries are very good i bought several sets for different cameras and all work like they should

works as well as the original - but beware polarity. The original battery has a yellow stripe down one side that lines up with markings in the camera to avoid putting in the wrong way around - so only 4 stars then!

We lost our charger and I saw this and so now I have a new charger that works in the house and the car and 2 spare batteries for under $20. Works great.

This revitalized an old camera. I was not expected to need this size drive ever. After taking it on vacation it was a blessing. It could store up to 2000 photos at 12MB each and we took over 1,000. I would definitely recommend this if you want to hold onto an older camera that you like the picturers it takes.

13 months and countless chargings and these are still going strong.

The batteries might be a little weaker than OEM but not significantly. The whole kit has worked great, all in all, very satisfied.

For those who don't understand about batteries and cells, these are batteries, which are made from cells. Japanese cells can be used to assemble this battery in China. Maxell (max cell), Panasonic and Fujicell are all Japanese cell makers, so I don't doubt the use of Japanese cells in this battery and if one ever quits I'll crack it open and report what I find.

I hope this helps you to decide this internet purchase.

*Update* It's been almost two years now and I'm still using these batteries. I've been using another camera more often, more recently so these haven't been been charged more than twice a month the past few months vs twice a week, but I still have no complaints with them after over 6000 photos.

The lens does not extend to take pictures. The shutter switch is missing.The USB cable is missing. The SD memory card is missing. The batteries were dead. The vendor never checked it out.

I then sent it back via UPS with your amazon's return UPS label. On June 17 UPS picked it up and scanned it into the system. Now UPS says it's lost, and that you or amazon must initiate a package search. Tracking number 1Z602V042628822379.

That was clearly my bad day.

Bob

did as it says and performs well so far. good price and sent in adequate packaging and prompt delivery .

Bought this for my wife so she could get better photos of our 2 young boys while they are growing up.I had researched and read up a lot of several cameras and found this one. The price was basically chopped in 1/2 from the original price since the unit is discontinued, but this thing is amazing.Take the time to read the manual and learn how to properly use it, you will greatly benefit from it. But, with a lot of things we just use the Auto settings and it takes amazing photos...I would HIGHLY recommend this camera to anyone from total beginner wanting a nice camera to the the semi-pro photographer. Obviously you can spend thousands on a camera, but for the price this thing will wipe out about anything else I've seen in the same price range.

NOTE: Please see Followup at the end of this review.

I've had a Fuji S100 for some time now. My main photographic activity is wildlife, nature and surfing shots, at a minimum of 200 yards. I print at fairly large sizes, usually 16x12 or 20x15in. I've gotten great results with the Fuji, but it has one weak spot (don't we all?): it has a burst of about 3.7fps at full resolution, with a 7-shot limit.

In search of a better burst, I did some research and ended up buying a Sony A550 (body only) and a 28-300mm (42-450mm equivalent) zoom lens. The Sony shoots 5fps (continuous autofocus) or 7 fps (single focus only) with a limit of 24 JPEG "fine" or 116 JPEG "standard" images. Plus the full zoom put me 12% closer to my subjects.

I tested the Sony against the Fuji, to see what else it could do better. After all, on paper the A550 appears superior to the S100. But the results were surprising.
The Sony A550: 14+mp, CMOS sensor, APS-C size.
The Fuji S100: 11+mp, CCD sensor, 2/3" size (less than half the APS-C size).

One test of long-range photographic equipment is to shoot license plates at long range. If a license plate is legible at 300 yards, there will be pretty good detail in a surfing or animal picture taken at the same range. The other factor I consider, besides detail, is the overall smoothness and quality of the final image.

The first thing I noticed is that the Fuji S100 has more manual user control than the A550. So much for the condescending "point and shoot" designation!

At full zoom (400mm equivalent for the Fuji, 450mm equivalent for the Sony), both cameras captured legible license plate numbers at similar distances in the zone between 300-450 yards. But the Fuji created smoother images: both straight and curved lines of objects were smooth, and surrounding foliage was crisp and clear.

I normally shoot at ISO100 in daylight, to keep noise at a minimum. But the Sony A550 has a minimum ISO of 200 (I've been told this indicates that ISO 200 is the optimum setting for the sensor) so I couldn't go below that with the Sony. The Fuji S100 has a minimum setting of 100, so I used that, as I usually do. I didn't see much noise difference between the two cameras at those low ISO levels, but there was some.

The lighting conditions (passing clouds) were a bit irregular--but of course they were irregular for both cameras--and I was trying to adjust to having to shoot at ISO200 and other intrinsic differences in the two cameras, but I'd have to say that all in all the Sony didn't do any better, in terms of IQ and overall picture quality, than the Fuji. Maybe the difference is in the lens quality, but the Sigma lens I was using is generally well-regarded, and in the opinion of some users is better than the comparable Sony lens.

I also compared partial zoom (150mm equivalent) shots of palm trees against a cloud-strewn sky and sea. Here, the results were even more in favor of the Fuji.

Both cameras were set at about the same shutter speed and aperture. In fact the Sony was set a little faster, and the aperture was a little smaller, which should have resulted in less blur and greater depth of field.

Results: the Fuji S100 is much more clear and focused throughout the image. The most distant palm trees in the Sony A550 images were not in clear focus, although trees at an intermediate range (about 75 yards) were. (You might say, well, yeah, it's called depth of field. But at f6.4 at 75 yards, that doesn't seem to be the issue, and in fact the Fuji at a slightly larger aperture had no such problem. And if I stopped down the Sony, I would have to up the ISO again, leading to more noise. In short, the Fuji allowed more flexibility.) This could be a lens problem, and I'm going to try another lens in a couple of days when it arrives. But so far, Fuji wins on sharpness and focus.

The Sony images were really noisy. Because it was late afternoon and cloudy, I had to use ISO400 to keep the picture from being underexposed. (The next lowest choice, ISO200, made it too dark.) I didn't want to shoot slower, because the cameras were hand held. And aperture was limited by the extended zoom lens. At the same time, the Fuji handled the entire situation much better, obtaining adequate exposure at ISO100 and creating images with no visible noise until the image was enlarged to the point where individual pixels began to appear. So as of now, the Fuji S100 wins on noise. And also on ability to get enough light at 1/4 the ISO.

I'm going to give the DSLR another try in the next couple of days; wait for the weather to improve, and try to get some action shots and some breaking waves and see if there is a way to get better pictures. As I've said, I bought the Sony A550 primarily for the faster burst mode and higher burst limit. But I have to ask myself: what's the

Great upgrade to the stock battery that came with my Fujifilm X20.

Does what it says.
- Higher capacity
- Faster charging with provided charger

I may buy a second set, because one can never have too many camera batteries! Especially at a good value.

I have been waiting to get this camera for so long and finally got it, feels great in your hand, has a lot of functions and image quality is great.The camera has a very fast AF, mine is a Serial number 33A and no problems with lenses or image quality, the only problem is that has so many options and I am still learning how to use properly, it is a lot better compared to the other superzooms I owned previously (Basically the top of the line Kodaks), now my old Kodaks look like a toy next to this camera.Works great in low light conditions and I am able to raise ISO all the way up to 1250 and see practically no noise on the pictures, so I am very happy with it.