Отзывы о Фотоаппарат пленочный Kodak H35N Ektar Half Frame 35mm Camera
1647 отзывов пользователей о Kodak H35N Ektar Half Frame 35mm Camera (H35N)
Пользовались
Kodak H35N Ektar Half Frame 35mm Camera (H35N?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
I have been and continue to be a confirmed film camera photographer as film (and its great variety of choices) gives me the versatility and image quality that I appreciate in the photographic works that I do. Digital photography for me (until recently) has solely been my use of dedicated film scanners to translate film into digital files to make the 10x15 custom digital prints that I do every week. (Although I used to do color darkroom work that activity has with time become impractical for me to continue to do.) Although digital printing is quite different than chemical color printing, digital printing with care and a similar attention to detail (as is required in chemical printing) is capable of quite excellent results.
A few years ago my wife bought a compact digital camera for herself and she soon used it more often than any film camera she ever had. I liked the pictures she was taking and I began to notice the strengths of a compact digital camera (that I am sure most compact digital owners are aware of ): the camera's unobtrusiveness and pocket-ability; the great depth of field of its 8mm lens; the new image capture possibilities of having a live preview monitor; the ability to change color, contrast, white balance, and sharpness settings; the ability to take hundreds of images without reloading a new memory card; and, of course, the capability of instantly reviewing captured images (to determine if certain images need to be re-shot). My wife encouraged me to try out her compact camera and after an initial probing out on my part of the camera settings to find the best way for me to use this camera effectively, I found that her little camera was indeed quite a camera for certain of my own desired uses. I, therefore, decided I wanted a compact digital camera of my own. For the next several months I read everything I could find about compact digital cameras. I was not at all interested in the digital single lens reflex cameras (as, if I knew in fact that I was going out to take pictures requiring heavy equipment, I was more than happy to use my film cameras and equipment). What I wanted was a versatile camera that would be on my person at all times for those occasions (sometimes numerous) when photographic opportunities unexpectedly present themselves.
I had not previously seen nor handled the Kodak V1073 camera but I was immediately attracted to its published specifications:
1. The Schneider-Kreuznach Varigon 37-111mm (35mm equivalent) all glass lens. I
wanted a modest zoom lens as I did not want a longer zoom range lens in exchange for a physically smaller camera sensor. Also, I did not want a zoom lens that zoomed too wide as I seldom use 35mm to 28mm lenses even though I own them. (There is very little distortion in the 37 to 55mm range of lenses.)
Schneider is truly one of the great lens companies of the world making lenses for prestigious camera makers too numerous for me to even attempt to mention. I have used and own Schneider film camera and darkroom enlarging lenses and they are among my very favorite lenses. Their optics are truly impressive. (The V1073 Kodak camera Schneider lens combination reminds me historically of the more than 70 year collaboration between Kodak and Schneider when Kodak turned the photographic world upside down in 1936 by introducing the more moderately priced German Retina 35mm camera (with variable controls and with Schneider optics) capable of using Kodak's newly invented 35mm film cassette (making 35mm film in a still camera practical for the first time) and the revolutionary new Kodachrome film which together created both the photographic color revolution and the fully viable 35mm camera revolution for the world.)
2. A Kodak made or designed 1/1.63" size camera sensor with 10 effective megapixels. (Some writers give the effective megapixels as 11.34 because of the larger sensor size). This is a very large sensor size for a compact digital camera of this type and I was attracted as much to this specification of the camera as by the Schneider optics. Also, it was important to me that this is a Kodak made or designed camera sensor. Many people know that Kodak is the pioneer company that in 1885 to 1889 invented cellulose based film and cellulose based roll films (modern films) making photography more broadly available to the public than was the case with metal, glass, and paper plate loaded cameras in the 19th century. Many people also know that later, Kodak created the "snapshot" revolution by introducing the Pocket Kodak Camera making photography available to a huge public. I already mentioned above the still later Kodak Kodachrome color revolution and 35mm still camera revolution that was based on Kodak's 35mm film cassette, Kodachrome film, and the excellent Retina camera with superb Schneider optics (not yet mentioning the huge impact
1-19-2012 after verifying refund I will state in my words what I feel happened: ***I had contacted the Company through Amazon's process to return goods, no response from the Cord Company until I had filled out a second review that was sent to my e-mail from Amazon, AFTER the review that Amazon sent to me, the Company selling the cord contacted me and asked if they refunded the price would I change my review. The money was refunded to my card, I did not have to return the item. Please note that I was not contacted by the Cord Company until after the e-mail from Amazon that wanted a review, not good customer service I personally feel and I wasted a lot of time and effort plus had to go to town and buy something that would work!
The best feature of the CD1013 is the red-yellow-green hand blur warning that shows on each picture. This really helps when you're outdoors in the sun and can't tell or don't have the chance to see how good your shot was. Get a red or yellow hand? Just take another picture -- maybe try to be steadier, change your zoom or focus or consider changing settings -- until you get a green hand. But depending on what you're focusing on, a red-handed picture may end up just fine anyway.
So far, I'm thinking this camera is pretty darn durable. I've been using it outside at work for the last month and a half -- often taking 100 shots a day, sometimes in light rain. I've dropped it several times in a camera case. So far, no major problems! After a few weeks, I liked this camera so much, I found a great deal on another used CD1013 -- but it arrived with so many scratches and a battery/memory card door that doesn't fully close that it looked like it had been in a blender. After getting a partial refund, I gave it to my five-year-old son. The fact it has survived its past and stood up to my son's abuse and still takes great pictures is amazing.
More pros of the CD1013:
-- Takes good videos with great sound; although no speaker so you have to play the video on your PC to hear the sound.
-- Fantastic resolution at the 10.1 megapixels. I usually shoot at 5 MP and still have fantastic pictures.
-- Pretty quick lag time to turning it on and taking the first shot.
-- Been using rechargeable alkaline AA batteries (1800 mAh) and usually get 200 shots or more. Even when you get a low-battery shut-off, opening and closing the battery door and doing so over until the batteries are totally dead can get you another 10-20 shots.
-- Easy and comfortable to use. Zooms in pretty steadily and quickly.
-- Menus and settings very easy to navigate. Handy messages explaining the use of settings pop up on LCD.
Some cons:
-- Sometimes outdoor shots in lower light in auto-flash come out dark for some reason. But turning the flash off usually gives a great picture.
-- Does not remember the flash setting you had previously selected when you turn it back on. But the flash button is right there next to the power button.
-- I have had some occasional moments of "Uh-oh, something's not right." Was sure I had a jammed lens the other day. But turning the camera on and off and maybe popping the battery door has fixed every problem yet.
-- Not the slimmest point-and-shoot you can find, but still fits in even a jeans pocket.
-- Hard to focus easily when using in the close-up macro mode.
-- Every time you change batteries you have to reset the date and time. But it prompts you to do so right away and it's a pretty minor annoyance.
The m1033 is extremely compact that carries a huge screen compared to many like models with similar capabilities. I love being able to see a picture on the screen and know what I may be missing before I press the shutter. It also has the Kodak smart capture feature, which allows for the camera to be able to dictate to the user what type of setting to snap the picture in rather than have the user choose from its mulitiple variations. I have found the smart feature to be accurate for the most part, about 8 times out of 10, which isn't too bad; however it doesn't help to have this feature on when you are trying to snap a picture in "the moment." The screen may look like the picture is coming off blurry or grainy, don't worry, this is natural and once you have pressed the shutter, you will see your picture the way you want it to print out. The other feature that jumps at you right away is the stabilization feature. While this particular model does not carry the IS (Image Stabilization) technology, it does have a built-in indicator which tells you how steady the camera was when the picture was taken. There is a green hand with motion bars for steady, a yellow hand with motion bars for in-between and a red hand with motion bars to let the user know the camera was not steady at all when the picture was taken. I like the feature, however it was not always accurate and on some occassions (very few) I was perfectly still and yet received a red hand. At which point I felt that perhaps by resetting it (turning it off and then on again) the system would restore the lens. Oddly enough, I was right. This may seem aggravating to most, but unless you are a photo journalist who needs his camera to be ready to fire at any given moment, this shouldn't be too much trouble the one time you may have to do this as the camera loads extremely fast. Other features include the ability to e-mail a photo from the camera once you dock it or connect it to your computer. The m1033 also has the Kodak Perfect Touch feature, which basically touches up your pictures immediately after being taken in order to minimize the amount of editing on a PC. The video shoots extremely well and I was able to view videos at a 720p capacity on a 19" monitor just fine. If you are desperate to have your PHOTO camera shoot in higher resolution so you won't have to buy a camcorder, then this camera is not for you. The last feature I was very impressed by was the stitch feature. This allows you to take a panoramic photo by taking three individual photos and then stitching them together at their seam points. I thought this was a nice feature for the times when one picture just doesn't say 1,000 words but instead 333. You'll find this feature particularly handy at football and baseball games as well as other sporting events. The only thing I will warn you about is that it is intended for still-frames so don't expect to capture action in this mode, you will only be able to get what remained still throughout shoot.
The review asks for best out of five stars, but if I had to give it a TRUE rating (best out of 10), this would be an 8.5 out 10. Excellent point-and-shoot camera with some great features. It is super-slim and is about the size of a Motorola Q or Samsung Blackjack. I recommend this to anyone looking to upgrade but doesn't want to spend too much money. If you have to spend more than $150 on this particular model I recommend you go for the m1093 IS, which is better than the m1033 on some aspects. No matter which model you go with, you will always find that Kodak does not disappoint.
Camera with a duplicate. I did so with much success.
Mr. Robert VandeBrake sent a letter of very helpful
information with the camera. This was amazing! I was
very pleased I chose to deal with him. This is the first used product I have purchased. Thank you Mr. VandeBrake!
The good news; the cable arrived promptly from the vendor, and it is definitely inexpensive. The bad; my computer does not recognize the camera when I plug it into the USB port with this cable (it did with my now-lost Kodak cable) and the camera won't charge at all through the cable... so I'm not even sure if the cable works to perform transfer of data. I doubt it since the computer won't recognize that the camera is plugged into it. I'm going to spend the extra money for a Kodak cable that I know will work. I also probably will no longer buy a Kodak camera because they use these ridiculous tiny non-standard ports to connect via USB instead of a standard-sized mini USB port like many other manufacturers.
This camera I bought on ebay for like 40 or 50 bucks used. Please do not NOT SPEND 200 for it or anything near that.
It is totally not worth it.
So the locking up issue: It is a common and real problem. Screen locks up, wont turn off or on. Solution:
Open up the battery compartment on the bottom, it slides to the right and opens. Then Press the little orange tab and pull battery out. Put back in. Turn on. This is the only way to fix it, so hopefully u arent in the middle of some video.
Pros--------------
Tough camera. I am a young clumsy mom with a very hyper and crazy toddler who has thrown this phone. I even sat on it and went down a slide, which cracked the screen and it still works. I let it sit in a bag that a stupid "nonspill" drink had happened to leak all over it where now it is saturated with orange juice and will try to see if i can make it survive but I doubt it.
Excellent battery. The reviews that say it sucks: well did you let it charge completely and discharge completely initially? hmm. No actual batteries to charge!!! means it will save ya money!
Decent pictures: 10MP is pretty awesome, the zoom does okay
Settings: I like the many settings (tons) I use Light behind subject (works excellent) and the panoramic is great and the Children/Sports setting does okay at taking subjects at high speed
Cons--------------
Weird coloration at times
Delay in shutter response
Poor Low light Pics
Poor Motion Pics or Children running around pics, I suppose ISO is not high enough
Hope this is helpful!! Thanks
It was dispatched very quickly and does exactly what I bought it for - can't ask for more than that really.
If your comparing with a Canon you should check the Kodak V1073 out first. I tried using one other Kodak model, and it seemed study, yet compared about the same as the other digital cameras around. The V1073 seems to be an (successful) experiment in breaking away from the typical Kodak camera, so I would limit my recommendation to only this camera.
CANON: The main reason I switched from Canon was the photo quality. I don't know if it's the technology or the internal software, but indoor pictures were inconsistent, and poor quality. The same picture taken seconds later at the same object, place, etc would look different. It would use the flash the first time, and not the second time?? I read books, blogs, everything. Changed the ISO until the quality broke down, nothing. Overall, pictures mostly turn out very dark or too bright with a flash. I did discover that this seems to be a recurring issue with canon point and shoot cameras as I found on amazon comments. Tired of owners manuals, ISO settings, etc, I began searching for a new camera, and accidentally ran into this camera in a store. I finally gave a U.S. camera company a chance, and it was worth it.
Background: I've owned about 4/5 digital cameras, and have experimented with many more. For the most part, I have bought the Canon series because of the look, weight, fairly ease of use, and very sturdy construction. However, as with most digital cameras (and technology as a whole) they have way to many features and little clear explanation of proper use.
Comment on previous comments about this camera:
-"the Kodak camera lense periodically "clicks" as it tries to adjust for lighting changes" I have not had this issue during the video mode. The camera will allow you to lock the focus if is an issue.
-"The battery and memory card Door [poor quality]" I will admit, this is the one thing I dislike about the camera. However, my last $350 canon battery door was no better. I've had no problems, and really don't expect I will.
-"The battery only lasted for about 30 minutes" My wife took over 100 10mp photos and uploaded it to our MacBook Pro with another day or two of power left over. Holds a good charge.
"battery bay latch also very easily comes unhooked" Never happened once in the time I've owned it
-"horrible video HD playback on PC" HD playback is INCREDIBLE. However, you do need software (just like you need the right TV and DVD Player) to effectively play HD. If you have a Mac, you will love this camera and the HD video as the camera video is formated for quicktime. It also works flawlessly with iPhoto and iMovie. PC owners - you have an inferior machine which will continue to become more and more inferior as technology moves forward. That said, I've played the video on my old PC laptop (with a free pc version of quicktime) with equal quality (pc owner for 20 years - recently switched to Apple). However, I doubt you will have any problem with this camera and a PC. I bought this camera instead of an $800 video camera to take extended videos of our first 3 month old son - and it works great. Video and photos in one easy to use package. Not sure why people still buy a camera for photos and a video camera for video. So many people I talk to still don't realize you can take video on most of todays cameras.
Pros: Work right out of the box/great pictures - clear, well lit - Kodak's PerfectTouch does a surprisingly good job of instantly fixing the photo after taken/great functionality/HD video/Clear settings/Touchscreen/info button explains how to setup for 4x6 photos, or whatever you want/very good light adjustment/Apple compatible/delete button offered on the screen right after you take the photo (if it's just a bad shot you don't want)/switches from view photos to take pictures simply by pressing the snapshot button halfway down - so simple!/solid feeling gunmetal construction/many other well thought out features
Cons:Battery door not the best construction/Battery must be charged while in the camera - no separate charger/camera has locked up twice - just remove battery for a sec and replace it - no photos lost - no big deal/only 3x's zoom - i have found it works fine for overall use.
Hope this helps...
I was looking for a decent camera to stick in my backpack this summer while I hike along the Appalachian Trail. I chose the Kodak EasyShare M1063 10.3 MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Zoom because it is small enough to pack easily and it had all the features I wanted.
The camera arrived VERY fast. I was pretty excited. I couldn't stop looking at it while it charged. It is a beautiful , sleekly-designed unit with a very solid feel to it.
I had read all of the reviews on Amazon about this camera, and while I noticed a few were bad, the vast majority were good, and I felt confident that I had bought a good camera.
Finally it finished charging and I couldn't wait to take some pictures. So I hiked up nearby Cedar Mountain and took a 10.3 megapixel picture of the town of Newington. The 8gb memory card I ordered hadn't arrived yet and the internal memory is only large enough to store 1 picture taken at 10.3 megapixels so I headed for home. I was very pleased with the camera's menu and functions. It is very easy to use. The picture I took looked great on the nice sized digitial screen on the back of the camera.
I couldn't wait to get home. At 10.3 Megapixels I should be able to make out my friends houses. I was anxious to see exactly how much detail would show.
A feeling of excitement made my fingers fumble a little while I was plugging in the USB cord.
I moved the picture to my hard drive and opened it up ready to say WOW.........
I couldn't believe what I saw....
The picture I just took was large but the quality of it was a freakin' joke. ABSOLUTELY HORRIBLE.
I couldn't believe it. No name brand company would sell something this bad. The other negative reviews I read crept into my brain and I started to worry......
I decided maybe I had done something wrong, so I went thru the instruction booklet very thoroughly. The instructions are very poorly written and offer very little about the cameras actual usage; however the on-screen help menu built into the camera is fairly comprehensive. After making sure I had the right settings I went out to the front yard to take some pictures.
I tried every setting from 10.3 megapixels to 1.3 megapixels and I tried all of the different light and color mode combinations and soon I came to a realization that really bummed me out.....
This camera is incapable of taking good pictures.
EVERYTHING LOOKS LIKE CRAP AND IT IS SO BLURRY AND GRAINY AND BAD THAT NO DETAIL AT ALL SHOWS UP.
This is not my fault, my hand is steady and the cameras blur-warning confirmed this by flashing a little green hand. (which means my hand was very steady)
I was looking at one of the 10.3 MP Pics I had taken of my frontyard, the grass looks literally like a child scribbled with a green magic marker. there is no detail whatsoever.
This camera is especially frustrating because the features, the design and the digital screen are all TOP NOTCH.......
THE PROBLEM IS THAT IT TAKES PICTURES THAT LOOK LIKE THEY WERE TAKEN FROM A CRAPPY CELLPHONE.
This is my second digital camera, and my second Kodak. It will be the VERY last Kodak anything I even consider for purchase. This camera is so bad it is offensive.
I know there are a lot of good reviews and tho I cannot understand how anyone can be happy with this piece of garbage I want to warn you that this camera takes AWFUL pictures.
I have never returned anything that I have purchased thru Amazon before. I do not even know what the return policy is.......
But this thing is completely , totally and utterly WORTHLESS, so I am hoping I can send it back......
DON'T BE FOOLED BY THE POSITIVE FEEDBACK LIKE I WAS. THIS CAMERA WILL NOT MAKE YOU HAPPY.
Genuine Kodak at a simply brilliant price. With P&P of £4.59 the total was £9.44 .. Still better value than buying direct from Kodak.
One moan !! I needed 2 batteries, so P&P cost £9.18 ... I wish companies would give discount on multiple orders, especially since postage actually cost £2.35 plus the recorded fee of £1.00++ I know incl. the cost of Packing etc £4.59 is ok, but on multiple orders it is annoying that it doubles.
The Battery itself, great buy, genuine item, at a brilliant price. Good Service and immediate dispatch. Well worth buying.
Below is my original review. I've actually downgraded this camera to one star because Amazon won't let me go any lower. I have now lost more pictures than I can remember - hopefully I downloaded them before this piece of junk died for the 4th time. I will leave my original post in below but I cannot stress how awful this turd of a camera is - sad, sad, sad.
This camera is very easy to use and takes good pictures and video when it actually works. The smart features helps even a novice like me take nice clear pictures with little to no red eye pictures. It is small and looks nice too.
Then the bad -- I had the camera for about 3 months when it started. I had the exact same issue that some others wrote about - I wished I would have read more reviews before getting this camera but my husband wanted a Kodak since it is USA made. After about 3 months of use - not a lot of use, mind you - the camera lens would not retract back into the camera and it wouldn't hold a charge. I got a new battery thinking that was it - nope. I ended up sending it back to Kodak. The 1st time it went back, I reported the issue online and was able to return it without having to call customer service. Since it only worked for about 1 week after I got it back, I had to call the 800 customer service number. Not fun times. Kodak - made in the USA - appears to have outsourced their customer service to another country. I had a lot of trouble trying to explain that it still was having the same issues even though I had just gotten it back, sigh. Finally I said, please just let me return it for servicing. Lots of quiet on the other end and me saying, hello, hello, are you still there ? Finally the man on the phone agrees to let me send it back for servicing for the 2nd time - that took more than 20 minutes phone time - and I sent it back again. The group that serviced it was very responsive and sent it back within a week - but having this happen again for the 3rd time - same problem - is why I say no to this camera. It is currently working but I haven't used it much thinking it's going to die any minute. Kodak will not replace my faulty camera with a new camera I was told (if this continues before the warranty runs out) -- only a refurbished model.






