Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX510 HS
1209 отзывов пользователей o Canon PowerShot SX510 HS
Пользовались
Canon PowerShot SX510 HS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Kalachik George
09.08.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + зум, терпимое качество снимков
- - не вижу если только трудно стабилизировать на дальнем конце
приемлемый...
Башлачева Ольга
18.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Не маленький и не большой, компактный, т.е. то что нужно. Много всевозможных настроек. Зум - это вообще песня!
- - Отсутствие:
1. защитной плёнки на экран.
2. руководства пользователя в бумажном виде.
Почти месяц выбирал фотокамеру. Никогда не думал, что это будет такой большой проблемой. Проще видео купить. Считаю что этот девайс отличный семейный вариант. Средних размеров, с массой настроек и с сумашедшим зумом, и адекватной ценой. А что ещё нужно отцу семейства?...
Кузнецов Евгений
10.06.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Великолепный аппарат! Отлично держит "КАДР" при любом зуме! ЭРГОНОМИЧЕН! Хороший функционал сюжетных съёмок! Самое наиприятнейшее - сверхбыстрый фокус.
- - Если считать недостатком...
Скроменый эксперт
29.08.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Универсальность.
- - Невозможно увеличить ISO более 80 при выдержке более 1 сек. Не сфоткаешь туманности за 15 секунд... 6400 -мутянка.
Брал из-за зума. Помешан на космосе.
Мостаков Павел
22.06.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + зум
- - пока нет)
Купил чисто для себя, люблю фотографировать. Зум отличный, качество видео и фото также на высоте!) Не могу сказать, что совсем...
Птицына Алина
31.05.2013
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
- + ZOOM
- - IОчень Шумный, фотографии не чёткие, при съёмке в близи искажаются (либо рахит, либо ноги отрубили) не соответствует прапорциональности человека...
Скроменый эксперт
09.02.2013
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
- + Замечательный аппарат, со всеми плюсами ультразума. Качество фотографий вполне удовлетворительное. Особенно в RAW.
- - С первого дня пользования при зуммировании выдает ошибку объектива.
Спустя 13 дней решила сдать в магазин. Сначала сказали, что обменяют в течение 10 дней. Теперь ссылаясь на законодательство...
нет нет
17.04.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Зум,вес,размер,качество фото,вспышка,настройки, шумоподавление.
- - Маркий экран, а остальное мои придирки) не разобралась как снять видео со звуком)))
Мне...
Скроменый эксперт
03.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Зум,качество снимков, тихий, универсальность использования, цена.
- - Есть сложность: в режиме видео только оптический зум но если во время съемки фото нажать на запись видео работает и цифровой так что не критично.
Пока выигрывал у всех...
Beketova Olga
16.02.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Маленкий, но сильный, зум мощный.В руке удобный. Даже RAW есть, автофокус четкий, кршка объектива на веревочке.Заказывала тестирование матрицы, дефектов-битых и горячих пикселей не обнаружено.
- - пока не заметила,...
Скроменый эксперт
24.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Супер!!! Фоткает лучше зеркалки!!!
50-кратное увеличение просто улет, можно четко рассматривать кратеры...
Скроменый эксперт
05.01.2013
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
- + Все в одном (видеокамера и фотокамера)
- - Пропадание звука, громкая работа при записи видео.
Ультразум сони 32-х 16 мп, 1980-50кадров в сек. Зарядка батареи за 1 час. лучше и дешевле. Цвета естественнее...
Совкова Светлана
22.11.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Зум, качество сборки, возможности фотосъемки
- - Возможно только на моем экземпляре - фоновый шум при записи видео. При зумировании отключается микрофон в рез-те заметно прерывания звука. При ручной настройке чувствительности микрофона в...
Valeriy T.
29.08.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Зум огонь!!!!
Наверное не кого не удивлю если напишу что можно снимать краторы на луне
pavel labonskiy
13.12.2023
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Плохая модель
- - Обнаружилось что хотя в состав комплектации должен входить аккумулятор, при вскрытии коробки он отсутствовал. Проверить камеру без него было невозможно. Хотелось бы с продавца получить денежную компенсацию. Чтобы окончательно не потерять свою репутацию.
Линар Хуснутдинов
09.03.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + фотик огонь. когда нет желания таскать с собой объектив на 600мм и больше. этот аппарат прям решает. особенно, если прикрутить ему ручку трипод, держать сразу удобнее и тогда снимут прям отличные. очень понравился.
Михаил Медведев
24.10.2020
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Универсален при отличном качестве съёмки Наличие RAW. Зум. Поворотный экран. Много удобных настроек.
Дополняю отзыв.
Время использования - 7 лет. У этого аппарата только один недостаток - требуется хорошее освещение. Добавляю снимки, сделанные им. - - По моему, у этого аппарата только один недостаток - не полноценная матрица,...
петр к.
09.03.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + баланс для фотолюбителя, между оптическими зумом и удобством быстрой съемки
Скроменый эксперт
12.12.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Достоинство этого фотоаппарата- зум-объектив с многократным увеличением. Можно использовать для фото-охоты ПРИ ХОРОШЕМ ОСВЕЩЕНИИ. Но у него Тип матрицы: 1/2,3" , такой же как и у любой мыльницы за 3 тыс. руб. Не предъявляйте высоких требований к качеству фото- вы его не получите, особенно в пасмурную погоду и в сумерки. К тому же объектив достаточно темный f/3,4- f/6,5. Кому не принципиально очень большое приближение (увеличить изображение ведь можно и на компьютере, просто обрезав края кадра), ЗА ЭТИ ДЕНЬГИ лучше взять CANON S 110 с гораздо большим размером матрицы 1/1.7", с очень светлым объективом и даже более компактных размеров. Качество же фото будет на порядок выше и возможна будет съемка при неблагоприятных условиях погоды. Даже возможно будет размывание фона в портрете, почти как у зеркалок.
Скроменый эксперт
16.04.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Wow. This is a truly amazing little camera. I bought this to replace my Nikon Coolpix. I had my coolpix for just over 12 months when it broke, due to no fault of my own, and it was going to cost $150 to repair. Rather than repair a camera that I liked but didn't love, I decided to make a new purchase.My initial intention was to purchase a Canon Rebel, I have used my mom's in the past and really love that camera. I loved using the interchangeable lenses and the ability to manually focus. Seeing the cost though ($500+,) plus the cost of additional lenses, it just wasn't in my price range at the moment and I needed a new camera urgently. If you're looking for a DSLR, do not expect this to function the same. It's a powerful little camera, but it is NOT a DSLR. If you're an amateur photographer and have no intention of taking a class to learn how to use the functions of a DSLR, this is a perfect camera for you.So began my research. It became a toss up between the Canon SX510 and the Nikon L820. Reviewers were split between the two, some preferring the Nikon, some preferring the Canon. They seemed to come out about even except in a few minor categories, and having been very pleased with the Canon Rebel, I decided to go with the Canon despite it costing about $30 more than the Nikon.Pro's-*30x Optical zoom - awesome, no more grainy pictures of kids on stage during performances*Built in wifi - go ahead and upload your pics to facebook, send them to your phone, or directly to your wireless printer.*Manual setting - can do your own iso settings, white balance, shutter speed etc. The auto setting works fabulously in most cases, far better than any camera I've ever owned, but the option is there for those times it's just not adjusting quite how you want it.*CMOS sensor provides for a clearer image, especially on the macro setting, than my own eyes give me.*Zoom assist - for when you use your 30x zoom but lose your subject*Size - for anyone that has gone hiking with a DSLR and multiple lenses, you know what a pain that can be. This lighter camera is perfect for running around and still has a lot of the qualities that you'd look for in a DSLR. So unless you're out taking professional shots, this comes in really handy*Discreet mode - This is a setting on the dial, great for those events when there is no flash allowed. In this mode, the camera doesn't make noise when turning it on, nor does the flash go off. Even if the camera goes off and you turn it back on, because it is set on the dial, it doesn't reset itself. I've accidentally had my flash turned back on so many times that way on previous cameras.Cons -*Very poor manual - A lot of skipping around to get one thing done. IE Looking through the start up manual, it says "for instructions on attaching (the lens cap cord and neck strap) please see the user manual on the canon website" Granted, it wasn't difficult to figure out, but there was no clear spot for the lens cap cord, and it is something that should have been included in a "start-up" manual. Another example of a poor manual, referring to the downloadable pdf manual...say you want to learn how to use the miniature setting...so it says "miniature setting, pg 48" You go to pg 48 and it says to follow steps 1 and 2 on page 46....okay back to page 46, got that down, back to page 48. It seems to be this way when trying to learn how to access any of the features. I can't fault the actual camera for this, but definitely Canon. I actually made up my own cheat sheet for accessing my favorite features until I have it down.*No ability to manually focus - Being that this camera is not a DSLR, I didn't expect or really even hope for this feature. I would have liked it, but for the $$, I definitely can't complain and will upgrade in the future.*Mirrorless - I would definitely prefer to use a viewfinder, I am used to going without though, so it's easy to work around.*No Raw Shooting - this feature doesn't apply to most people, but sometimes I prefer to use it*No Touch Screen - This is taking time for me to get used to, I find myself constantly tapping the screen. My last 2 cameras, going back to 2010, have been touch screen, so I'm surprised to find this camera doesn't have one.Some reviewers have complained about the difficulty of accessing the wifi, this was fairly easy for me and took about 15 minutes max. It's a little more work than it typically takes to connect a device to wifi,and you have to use the computer to do it, but it's still not overly difficult.Despite the cons, I'm still incredibly impressed with this camera and it has definitely earned 5 stars when taking into account the type of camera, the construction, and the value. I'm very happy with this purchase despite the fact that I was hoping for my next camera to be the Rebel. I never imagined I'd get a camera of this level of quality for under $400. (I paid $229, could have bought a slightly cheaper one, but wanted one that was Amaz
Скроменый эксперт
06.04.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Coming from an SX30, and standard point and shoot cameras, I was very hesitant about this camera. I owned the sx30 for about 4 weeks before selling it. The image quality was horrid...The lens on the 30 wasn't sharp, the images were blurry and out of focus, the colors while accurate, were often overexposed. So when I heard about the sx50 I was very hesitant. But I took at look at the images side by side with the SX 30, saw that the lens on this camera was much much sharper, and decided to give some credit to all the reviews that were raving about the improvement on the image stabilization system on this camera. It arrived and I had a chance on a nice sunny day to take some photos. I was blown away. The color is there, rarely did I have any overexposure (something commonly seen on many of the compact canon point and shoots), and the image stabilization allowed me. to capture moving birds at a decent 1/150-1/300 second all the way zoomed in. Full zoom. For a point and shoot camera for outdoor photography, I am very impressed by the images that this camera can put out. It balances color well. If you wish, you can take a look at some of the pictures I have uploaded on flicker. You will find samples of unedited, full resolution on program mode that I took outside in the late afternoon early evening hours. They look great. To view them select the links below and copy and paste them into your browser. (please note for full size download on flickr, you have to click on the three dots on the right hand side of the page. It will show download all sizes. Click on that and then select the Origional size and click download to view the photos in full resolution These are all 12mp unedited full size photos. Make sure the images are viewing as SX50. Here they are:https://flic.kr/p/mRb32Whttps://flic.kr/p/mRaVhohttps://flic.kr/p/mRbTkfhttps://flic.kr/p/mRbRduhttps://flic.kr/p/mRbVydhttps://flic.kr/p/mRadCMTo put it the least, I am very impressed with the outdoor shots on this camera. As it so happens, I take the majority of my photos in conditions where there is sufficient light, as I enjoy nature photography and vacationing, most of which even in a dim forest, is still outside and allows enough light to this sensor to get great images. But if this doesnt fit you, and if your into indoor photography, and want to take pictures WITHOUT the flash, than I would encourage you to keep looking . The reason I say this is that ISO beyond 800 is not usable on this camera (as is the case with most point and shoots). You can still get some good shots in well lit rooms, but if you think your going to take this camera into a church and take wedding photos where there isn't sufficient light and have it look as sharp as it would outside without flash, I would look elsewhere. In fact there are two cameras I would recommend in this case. Half the people on here are claiming that DSLRS are super expensive, which is what led me to this fairly camera. Its called the olymus EPM2. Its one of the new interchangable mirroless cameras on the market. However instead of using Sonys expensive NEX lenses, it uses the Micro 4/3 system that is shared by both Panosonic and Olympus and that is taking off like wildfire right now among photography companies. If you can nab one for around 300-350 with the kit lens, its a good price as of April 2014. The camera:The EPM2.Its a 16 megapixel camera that costs nothing next to a DSLR. You can use hundreds of lenses and the image quality will put most point and shoots on the market to shame...save for the SX50 which im still just blown away by with good lighting. Anyhow the samples for the OlympusAgain to appreciate the optics, click on the three dots on the right hand side once the page loads and click on view all sizes, select the origional size, download and view. The senor on this camera is used in another 800 dollar camera made Olyumpus:https://flic.kr/p/eSzRgchttps://flic.kr/p/eSMwAChttps://flic.kr/p/eSzLR8Plus you can use lenses of various types as low as f1.2 for indoor photography. Another one to look at on flicker is the Panasonic GF3. Here is a sample photo of that one:https://flic.kr/p/9T34MZ (same process. Click on the three dots on the right side of the page and click download other sizes and select the origional size, download and view on PC).Anyhow the senors on those cameras are much larger and are on DSLR level without being nearly as expensive. The Olympus is 16 MP, the Panasonic is 12 MP. You can find the panasonic for under 250 with the lens kit. Its a GREAT price! Find a zoom lens 20-150mm for under 100 and your at the right at this price point.That being said, if your into the long zoom and you think you will be shooting mostly outdoors, I cant recommend the canon Powershot SX enough. Its an amazing camera for what I use it for, and Im very impressed by the improvements in auto focus, color reproduction, lens sharpness (its a sharp lens for this focal length. Two thumbs up for canon
Скроменый эксперт
13.03.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I'm an experienced nature photographer, having been at it for over 50 years. I have been using Canon's PowerShot cameras going back to the S3. My relationship with these cameras has been a love-hate one, but the SX40 was a "Like" and this is "Really-Like-but-Love-is-too strong-a-word."See uploaded photos (click on "most recent") many of which have been published in birding magazines as well as with Audubon societies. But remember, I know this camera...This should NOT be your first-time-digital point and shoot camera! The learning curve is way too sharp because this camera is quite complex, and has unnecessary bells and whistles that you should avoid (at least until you learn the basics).What did I think about this camera? Well, after doing an awful lot of research, *I bought two* even after there had been a "recall" which I still don't understand! (One of these was for my wife.) I am a pro turned amateur nature photographer, and have been for many years. As for digital, I have had the Canons S3, S5, SX10, SX20, SX30 (returned immediately), SX40, and now the SX50.After you've played with the SX50 for a couple of days, I'd be happy to send my standard settings if you just email me. Here are the improvements over the SX40 and all SX models that preceded this (you can see the progression on my web site (see my profile).The good:1. Shutter lag is minimal! You can shoot in burst mode of 7-9 frames per second depending with the mode you're in, but shutter lag has been cut by 70%. Canon says that you can shoot up to 13 frames per second. Not with this camera, but 7 should be sufficient.2. Fast focus with center metering. The SX40 (and other like cameras) want to focus "on an average" of all the elements in a shot. Unfortunately, anything that uses the term average is like the guy with his head in the refrigerator and his feet in the oven, and on average, he's comfortable. It just doesn't work that way ... which is why you should also steer clear of "Auto." (More later) So, basically, if there's a bird on a branch in the center of a bunch of branches and twigs, the SX50 WILL focus on the bird and usually on the first try.3. Super Fine Mode. The SX40 goes to Fine resolution, but still left noise (the "snow" you'll see when cropped a distant shot of a bird etc.). For lack of a better way of putting this, Super Fine Resolution gives you many more pixels making the shot "tighter" and easier to crop without losing definition.4. Burst (continuous) Mode: This will hit a top speed of 9 frames per second. That's maximum, but if you can find a bird in flight, you stand a pretty good chance to get at least one frame in focus. It could be the bird's butt as it's leaving, but it will be in focus. There IS a locking device called High Speed AF (two buttons to the left of the lens). I am still trying to master this, and it will come to me ... I hope. So far, it feels like I'm trying to play an accordion with both hands doing something. I am pretty good at panning, but finding a bird in flight in the fully extended zoom is difficult. High Speed AF should correct that problem.NOTE: In order to get the most from burst mode, reducing shutter lag, etc., be certain to get a SDHC card! You need a fast card to maximize some of the aspects of the camera. Also, because the files will be much larger than what some are used to, I use a 16GB CLASS 10 card,* but 32GB CLASS 10 when on vacation in Yellowstone, Rainier, Bryce, Yosemite, in other words, anywhere where I'll be taking as many as 1,000 shots a day. And yes, especially with burst mode, you can easily take 1,000 pix on a vacation day. A Class 10 card will transfer 10 MG per second. If you want to - and you will - take pictures in burst mode, you need that speed between card and camera processor.5. Low light: Well, it isn't a disappointment because I expected this. You're buying a camera with a one chip sensor as opposed to 6-9 with a DSLR. The lens does allow more light than the SX40, but it still isn't a DSLR. Indoors, I recommend a flash.6. I have 9 settings that I use very often, but not all the time. One of the most critical difference is the white balance so that I don't blow out the whites of birds, goats, even recently bathed dogs. You can store ALL of your favorite settings in two modes C1 and C2. I store my settings for bright, sunny days in C1, and for low light or cloudy days in C2.7. IMAGE STABILIZATION: There's IS and then there's IS. The SX50, for a one-bit processor, has marvelous IS. I took shots of my TV's "What's playing" menu at 1/5 of a second (that's SLOWWWW!), hand held, and it was so sharp that my optometrist could actually see what I was complaining about, ghosting of letters and numbers on a white background. There are several photos I posted here that were taken hand-held at 1200mm (full zoom), and they're tack-sharp. Note that I haven't used a tripod or monopod since my 35mm SLR film days.8. Weight: 21 ounces and a 1200mm zoom! Those who carry a 6 pound camera
Скроменый эксперт
28.02.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I like this camera overall. The image quality is excellent in terms of detail, color accuracy, saturation, sharpness, consistency, and depth of field at all aperture settings. I tested six other competitive cameras in the super-zoom/bridge camera category, and this is the camera I ultimately purchased.So . . . the end results are very good; however, I have a number of complaints concerning the poor design and ergonomics of this camera. Read on . . .The absolute MOST annoying design flaw is that the self-timer button is the far right "wing" tab of the circular function wheel which is located, as one holds it, on the very far right-hand edge of the back of the camera body. This is a most unfortunate location for this or any other control button, since almost every time you pick up, pass, or hold the camera to shoot, the heel of your palm or your thumb inadvertently presses this button and activates the timer - GRRRRR! Often this cannot be corrected with just a single button press, as the timer has a number of elapsed time options and you may have to depress the button numerous times to turn the timer off and commence shooting! One has to learn how to delicately and unnaturally hold the camera to prevent this from occurring, and even then it happens consistently despite one's best efforts. Canon has tried to ameliorate the problem by designing a thumb-trough with grip nodules swaled into the camera back to help guide your hand into a holding position that will not trigger the timer; this helps a tad, but the resulting hand position, requiring that right-handed folks support the camera with the pressure of the ball of one's thumb is neither natural nor intuitive, and it detracts from one's ability to hold the camera steady. This flaw drives me out of my mind, to be honest, and if it were not for the camera's good performance which has forced me to learn to live with this perpetual frustrating annoyance, this would be a total deal-breaker.If Canon improves nothing else in its next iteration of this camera, fixing this issue is a must-do. It would be so simple to relocate the timer button, or move the function wheel a millimeter or two to the left and away from the edge of the camera body which is used for gripping, even if that would mean shrinking the LCD screen a touch or making the camera a fraction wider.Second major issue: the electronic LCD viewfinder's resolution at a mere 202k dots, frankly speaking, is absolute junk compared with competitors in this bridge camera category and price range, all of which at least more than quadruple this resolution spec! I use an EVF a lot, and it is almost essential if you want to take photos in bright light or shoot extended telephoto shots without camera-shake blur. There is no excuse for so poor an EVF. And the diopter adjustment wheel is EXTREMELY difficult to operate - fortunately, you can set it for yourself and forget it after the first grueling five minutes of fingertip-shredding adjustment, but if you want to pass your camera to someone else to use, forget them ever being able to adjust it to their own vision prescription!Related to the EVF inferiority is the inconvenient location of the button which alternates the photographer's view between the EVF and the LCD screen, and its inconvenient operation. This button is located on the bottom right of the camera back, and you must pull the camera well away from your face to locate and operate it. Moreover, since the button is one of many dual-function buttons on the camera, you must press it twice quickly to change the views -- silly, and it slows down composition and shooting. This camera either needs a well-designed automatic EVF switching sensor, or else the button needs to be relocated -- ideally to the left side of the flash unit near the [hopefully-soon-to-be-redesigned] diopter wheel, where it belongs!Some good news: the telephoto (1,200 mm equivalent, optical, plus additional power in the digital realm) is amazing. With practice and technique, you can actually eliminate most camera-shake blur, even at such an extreme focal length (especially with the use of the aforementioned low-rez EVF). There is also a button on the side of the lens housing that further locks in the image stabilization - although this is a bit clumsy to use, and why Canon couldn't build that tweak into the actual stabilization algorithm, I don't know -- especially since the button is quite difficult to locate by feel, even with practice, and often jars the camera when one has to depress it against the lens barrel, thus defeating its efficacy entirely!Personally, I could do with better image stabilization and less zoom - let's face it, 1,200 mm + digital zoom is simply overkill; 1,000 mm optical, tops (like almost all its competitors in this camera class), would be plenty, and the zoomed images would perforce be more consistently clearer due to more manageable image-stabilization at the extreme focal lengths. If you give folks a mass
Скроменый эксперт
04.10.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Two Minute Guide to Super Zoom Bridge CamerasBy way of a mercifully brief introduction, I make a goodly portion of my living with the use of digital cameras, and have for a very long time. My applications are wildlife and the outdoors, product reviews, industry consulting work, and legal work. Part of the territory is optics, whether binoculars, laser rangefinders, scopes, or cameras. Image examples are readily found online and in print from numerous devices, you can check the latest issue of African Adventures magazine if you wish.We all have different eyes, heads, hands, fingers, and divergent uses for cameras. Nothing replaces a bit of quality hands on time with any camera, for what feels good to me might feel too large or too small to you. It is of course why we try on clothes and take test drives: there is no one size fits all and cameras are not excluded from that. Some folks may consider video capability of great importance. Many buying cameras have no interest in video at all.Only you can decide what fits your hands and your needs. Whether you think a camera is too heavy, too bulky, or too light and too dinky, you're always right. Some may find a 1-1/2 pound camera a lightweight dream as opposed to a system camera and lenses that totals 30 pounds or more. Yet, the bridge camera-class in its entirety could just as easily be considered horrifically overweight pigs, compared to a 7 ounce shirt pocket camera. I'm calling a bridge camera a small-sensor non-interchangeable lens camera, with at least 35x zoom range, and a 1000mm maximum focal length for purposes of this article.Fuji HS50EXRThis Fuji currently sells for under $400, has the largest and most advanced sensor of the cameras very briefly covered here, is the heaviest of the group at 28.5 ounces, has the fastest auto focus and zoom. This Fuji has a Its 24mm to 1000mm zoom range. It also has an articulated LCD at a pleasing 920K resolution, as well as an electronic viewfinder of 920K dots as well. It is capable of the best images of this group of cameras, although it takes a bit of work to explore and embrace the 1/2 inch EXR CMOS II sensor.With phase-detection auto-focus and enough features to suggest you download and peruse the HS50 manual (or brochure) for details, this camera may sound like the best of breed. Well, it certainly could be considered that, to some it is. However, the zoom is manual: a reason you will either love this camera or hate it. The manual zoom makes it difficult for smooth-zooming operation during video, so what is its great strength to some is also a weakness at the same time.Fuji SL1000A bargain at $290 street price (as low as $250!), the 28.5 oz. SL1000, uses the smaller 1/2.33 sensor (compared to the HS50), yet is still a 24-1200mm 35mm equivalent camera. It also loses 25%-35% of the HS-50's its price as well. While light in price, it isn't light enough to carry, and the lack of a fully articulated LCD is a slight negative (if you want to be in the picture), though it does tilt enabling overhead shots. In most ways, the Fuji is the better general purpose camera than the Canon SX-50: better EVF, better LCD, far better rubbery grip, slightly better battery life, better video, and a $70 - $120 or so lower price tag as a bonus. The SL1000 also has the panorama mode that Canon still ignores as well.Canon SX-50Claimed to be the world's first 24-1200mm or 50x zoom bridge, it now has a lot of company. At 21 ounces, it sheds almost a half pound as compared to the Fuji HS50EXR. The electronic viewfinder is 202K and unimpressive. The 460K articulated LCD is very well done, but small, as now there are higher resolution (and larger) displays out there. Its video mode is excellent but limited, *if* you shoot at 720p and 30 frames per second. It lacks an auto-panorama feature, its lens is slightly dim compared to many, but it is a fun camera to use with a balanced level of performance that suits me extremely well for wildlife and the outdoors, even if technically it falls short on some features compared to the Fuji HS50 and has a slippery build compared to the SL1000.Panasonic FZ-70With a 20-1200mm (60X) range, the latest from Panasonic has built-in marketing hyperbole. At 21.44 ounces, it is minimally and trivially heavier than the Canon. It shares a 202K viewfinder with the Canon, though, and lacks the Canon's articulated LCD which is a huge, inexplicable deficiency. The Panasonic LCD does not even pull out and tilt, forcing you to rely on the lackluster EVF more than you would want to. Overhead shots, as in shooting above a crowd are not possible. The Chinese build quality here is just average, and the non-Leica branded lens seems to be average as well. The images are soft, particularly at the long end, and its burst mode of only three images maximum is disappointing as well. It was a disappointment to me, compared to the rest of the pack.Sony HX300The Sony HX300 is the most expensive camera of the group, takes somewhat soft pict
Показаны отзывы 169-192 из 1209.
