Отзывы о Сканер Canon CanoScan LiDE 300
1154 отзывов пользователей o Canon CanoScan LiDE 300
Пользовались
Canon CanoScan LiDE 300?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Супернова-4IXJF
06.04.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I bought this scanner because someone else had recommended it. The scanner arrived when Amazon said it would arrive. I immediately unpacked it, installed the software, and tried scanning some negatives. Excellent results! I then tried some old 35mm slides and it worked equally well. I have more than paid for the scanner by the amount of pictures that I have scanned from the many negatives that I had managed to amass. If you scan several pictures at once, the software does not treat them as one giant picture, instead it makes them into individual pictures. My only concern is that I feel that the film carrier is or could be a bit flimsy, but with care it should last for as long as you own the scanner. Also, the LED lighting makes for an almost instant on scanner. I just can't say enough good things, I am so glad that I bought it.
Лунатик-7FWRQ
05.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I just purchased this scanner after comparing it with others (Epson for one). Over the last 3 days I've scanned over 300 slides from in the 1960s/70s (there are several hundred more to be done).Using the scanner driver in the advanced mode, there is a variety of setting choices, including compensation for fading and dust. It scans 4 slides at a time. The initial scan allows you to preview the slides and choose which ones you want in the final scan. After that scan, you have the option of cropping the pictures before saving. You can also choose to save one in the original size and one cropped. The preview scan is fast; the final scan takes a bit longer as each slide is scanned individually.The quality has been consistently very good, But one does have be alert. Once I rescanned a slide that I was not pleased with, and it came out better the 2nd time. So I'm keeping my eye out for that possibility as I go. I will revise this review if I notice it, or anything else, happening consistently. I am very pleased with this scanner so far. It's been a step into the forgotten past for me.
Дроид-4OKSD
25.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I'm using this to scan thousands of 35 mm slides that I have from the 80s and 90s, and it works great whether using the automatic mode or doing things with the various selectable modes. The menu system takes a little getting used to, but after experimenting around I've figured things out. Too bad the manual writers apparently never really use these in the real world because if they did the instructions would be much clearer and easier to follow. I've been scanning the slides at 4800 DPI, and it generally takes about one minute each for a kodachrome 35mm slide. The results are excellent and I use a Polaroid Dust and Scratch Removal software (free on the internet and works with Win 8 and others) to clean the scanned images up if necessary. This scanner is well worth the money in my short experience with it.
КиберНаблюдатель-6TYHP
27.10.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
First of all, I also have a Fujitsu ScanSnap S1500 Instant PDF Sheet-Fed Scanner for PC, and I will be comparing this Canon with my experience with the Fujitsu.Both scanners have a nice small footprint and can scan a variety of paper sizes (although not large), including business cards. Both scanners do a very fast job at scanning the documents (duplex, in one pass - woohoo!).What does separate these scanners from each other is the software. The Fujitsu comes with its own snapscan software coupled with Adobe Acrobat (standard version). This allows for a pretty standard setup with a large range of compatibility and support. The Canon comes with a 3rd party suite of software from Nuance. The pdf pro software is good and also has a wide range of options, maybe even more than the Adobe software. However, the Fujitsu snapscan software is just more user friendly and seems much easier to use. I have an easier time getting documents into and organized with the SnapScan software than I did with Canon's software. Again not a severe difference, but a little easier for sure ....Overall, both scanners are very, very capable, but the software really seems to be the defining difference. Either of these scanners can do a great job of digitizing your life, and do it with accurate OCR software at incredible speeds. Both scanners can handle roughly the same capacity and page sizes. I have not "raced" them both side by side, but both scan at incredible speeds and create great looking images.Again, the main difference is the software that comes with it. Both are very capable, but the SnapScan just seems a little easier to use, with a little more polished integration.Bottom line: if you can get both at the same price, I might go with the Fujitsu, but if you can get the Canon at 50 bucks or more off, go that route. Either way, you will have a very good scanner to help you digitize your life and toss your file cabinets. Not to mention the ease of sharing documents with others and being able to find documents with a simple text search. Once you have the experience of finding a document that you need that way - you will never want to go back. These scanners are simply awesome and the Canon delivers alongside the Fujitsu.** One of the comments listed on this review pointed out a very good issue: Unlike the Fujitsu, (which has a scanner and software made separately for mac and pc) the Canon has software that can work with PC and MAC at the same time. So if you have a "mixed" environment, then the Canon may win on this fact. That is a huge bonus .... Thanks!
Квазар-8MBYK
11.03.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I purchased this scanner to digitize a variety of business and personal papers, and I've been using it heavily for a few weeks. This is my first scanner. It's meeting my needs and I'm generally happy with how the project has gone. I think I'd buy the same scanner again. However, things aren't as smooth as I hoped when I bought it.Pros:* The scanner seems fast, especially in the 200-300 dpi range.* I'm happy with the quality of the scans. Much of what I'm scanning is old and worn and includes detailed images. The scans are clear and easily readable for me.* The form factor is brilliant; it's easy to store.* Works with a variety of software courtesy of TWAIN compatibility.Cons:* The bundled PaperPort software is just terrible. I've uninstalled it and explored options to replace it (more on this below). Whatever I choose, I'll be spending extra money to replace the inadequate bundled program.* The scanner double-feeds papers way too often, especially with older papers. In practice this means I have to babysit it while scanning.* I haven't been able to get the one-touch scanner button to work under Windows 7 (64 bit). This is minor for me.On the software: My goal is to convert huge piles of disorganized paper information into a file system I can carry with me and search on any computer. My file formats include PDF (what I'm scanning plus some already in digital format), Office and text documents.I have not found a graceful solution. Scanned files are easy to turn into "searchable PDFs" with programs like Acrobat Standard or Pro, FileCenter or Evernote (but not the bundled PaperPort!). However, Windows can't search within searchable PDFs, and applications that can are either not easily portable (FileCenter) or won't search Office files (Acrobat and Evernote).Additional considerations:Scanning from Acrobat produces fuzzy PDFs. I've played with Acrobat's scan settings and tried several options including the program's ClearScan; but the files look better when scanned from Canon's CaptureOnTouch or from FileCenter.FileCenter's export to RTF or Word is awkward because it loses most formatting, and it also loses its place in the directory system every time. This requires clicking all the way back through the file system to save the converted file where I am.Evernote limits both total data uploaded each month and maximum file size; and I have concerns about putting my stuff in the cloud.So my options are:1) FileCenter: Scan from FileCenter and save "shadow" RTFs (clicking through multiple directories each time and accepting the loss of formatting), so I can search with Windows.2) Acrobat: Scan from the Canon software to avoid fuzziness. Acrobat can either save text as RTF in "shadow" files OR produce searchable PDFs. If I go with searchable PDFs then I need to use Acrobat to convert my Word files into PDFs so I can search with Acrobat Reader wherever I go.3) Scan from Evernote and use Evernote to convert all my Word files to PDFs so I can do Evernote searches; or4) Run two searches every time I need to search the files (not acceptable).The upshot is that I'm frustrated with the state of the available software. However, I don't know of another scanner that solves these problems better, and this is a great little scanner for home and occasional use. If I had the decision to do over, I'd buy it again.
Квантум-1JXIC
28.03.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Okay so I use scanners all the time because I am tired of having paper pile up on my desk. I've been using the flatbed that came with my HP Deskjet F4200 (which is a fantastic little printer by the way) and the although the scanner works fine, it is not duplex and does not have a feeder and is slow. But the quality is fine. It does work great for things you can't feed into the P150 such as credit cards, licenses, wrinkled/damaged documents etc.So here is where the P150 shines and you will need sunglasses.1. It does receipts seamlessly. The feeder narrows down for even the tiniest gas receipts.2. It is quick. The paper just runs through without even the slightest of noises or whirring sounds.3. It makes beautiful scans and very rarely requires adjustments to the settings.4. OCR is performed automatically. (doesn't get everything but you can run OCR again with other software such as Acrobat pro etc)5. The scan software is simple, intuitive, fast and just plain excellent.6. You don't have to click on any software to scan. Just stick the paper in and hit the button and voila, it scans. Then just save and your ready for the next one.7. I haven't had a jam yet. Seriously. Make sure you install in the included page separator component as it appears some other negative reviewers failed to do so.8. The thing is tiny, but solid and just very cool. Dust on black is no big deal as some reviewers complain. The thing closes up and is completely protected. The gloss black is fine and quite nice actually. Take care of it, and get a HEPA air filter or something. Give me a break.9. It doesn't need a power cable! Just plug into standard USB and you are in business. It apparently will go faster with the included 2nd USB power cable but it's already WAY faster than my flatbed. I suppose if you were douing a huge stack of paper you would, but I don't want it to go any faster with the creases and folds in my documents...I'd rather see it go at a nice medium pace.10. Yes, I tried the NeatReceipts product and save your self. It is a total waste and a real piece of inferior equipment plus it is proprietary and the software is absolutely horrifying.11. Even if the receipt doesn't feed straight, the software fixes it. What a time saver!!!12. This is a biggie. It is DUPLEX meaning it scans both sides of documents and if a side is blank it is smart enough to ignore it.13. I haven't had any problem with Skewing as some have mentioned. Sounds like those people need to get Adobe Acrobat and hit "Optimize". That automatically fixes the document if it fed slightly off. Come on people, this is a SCANNER not a printing press what goes in, is what comes out.And last but definitely not least, this one is TWAIN COMPLIANT, unlike the similarly featured and pricey, Fujitsu Scan Snap!!! (the Fujitsu Scansnap, has to use it's own special proprietary software to get the scans. And you can't use other software. The Canon P-150 ImageFORMULA however, works with all standard scan software products that have the ability to acquire scans which is most of them these days, such as most image editing software, MS-Word, Adobe Acrobat, and the list goes on)Hip Hip Hooray for CANON!-Abe M. AlexanderRealtor, Windsor, CA
Квазар-1GUBQ
01.04.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I haven't tried out all of the features, but I am happy so far. I like how the lid holds itself open at 45 degrees. My old printer took both hands to change sheets. I first saw this in Fry's and saw how they rated the speed of the Canon scanners right on the box. The 9000F's scan cycle is just 7 seconds compared to the next cheaper model at 12 seconds. For about $70 more I could have gotten it down to 5 seconds. The price at Fry's for the 9000F was $180 on the shelf. I saved $26 by purchasing it from Amazon.com for $154. The first scanned images were faint until I learned how to change the contrast settings. I still need to try scanning some negatives and slides.
Гравитон-4MEQZ
09.03.2013
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
This scanner is probably a great scanner. I say that because, after several days of fooling with it, I STILL cannot get the "one-touch buttons" on it to work. I spent a half-hour with a Canon phone Rep that was one of the biggest jerks I've dealt with on a support question in my entire life. It's obvious Canon doesn't give a rip about their phone support quality, as I never got a survey on the incident.I really believe this scanner COULD be the best one available, especially for the money, except for LOUSY support. I'm going to load the software and see if it's simply a glitch in my near-new laptop, but this shouldn't be Rocket Science...
Аргонавт-2FBZQ
18.12.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I do a LOT of research before I buy ANYTHING! It pays off when the items are still up and running years and years later. This little machine is great! It stores in a cabinet on my computer desk. Out of sight, out of the way. Beautiful. I have used it to scan just about anything paper-based. It works quickly and quietly. The lack of an output tray is simply handled by placing it to face the length of the desk. That way, it leaves a nice little pile of scanned documents on the desk. Who needs an output tray? The other quirk was one I had seen mentioned in reviews - the taking of multiple sheets through the sheet feed when trying to scan them. I found the simple solution - wrinkle the tops of the pages just a little. This done, the sheet feeding problem is totally solved. It just doesn't like flat, slick, and 'new' pages. Me neither. Worth the money. Worth the quirks. I would buy it again!
КиберНаблюдатель-2MCAS
03.04.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I Have used this scanner for 2 weeks and have scanned about 400 slides from the 50`s. It has done a creditable job since a lot of the slides are a long way from perfect. I have had to use the auto correct on a number of them and it truely helped. The regular scan process does them pretty quick but the auto correct takes about 5 minutes for 4 slides. I am totally satisfied so far with this scanner and would recomend it to anyone wanting to transfer slides and photos to JPG files. I`m sure text docs will work fine too.
Астероид-1KMUB
22.01.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Like many other people I got sick of having so much paperwork in the office. My ultimate goal is to get rid of my file cabinet or at the very least keep it down to a single draw in a desk. I'm in a sales job and often need to keep track of discussions or concepts that I show to customers. This scanner has allowed me to keep most of my files stores electronically. My company uses a cloud based sales management/CRM application so I simply scan everything using the P150 and attach it as pdfs to their records.This scanner is perfect as it is relatively small and compact which makes it easy for me to transport it from the office to home and back when I need to as it fits neatly in my laptop bag or in the bottom of my briefcase. If you are road warrior this would be the perfect tool. One neat feature is the ability to scan both sides of a document at once. I noticed a couple of reviews where people complained that they often only wanted one side of a document and were forced to manually delete the back side of a pdf via Acrobat or something similar. This is really not an issue as you can easily change a setting in the management software to scan single sided as opposed to duplex. I have also read a few complaints about documents skewing. I have found that this can occur but usually not if you make use of the paper guides that flip up from the unit. The scanner also has a function built into it that helps to detect this problem and will try to automatically rectify it for you.I bought the additional power source but to be honest I hardly ever use it and 99% of the time I simply plug it into my laptop via the USB cable and find that the speed of scanning is perfectly acceptable for everyday use.After nearly 12 months of use I am still extremely impressed with this scanner. My wife likes it so much that she has suggested that I buy another one that we can use exclusively at home. If you are looking for a compact scanner for home and/or small office use I would highly recommend this one.
Кронос-1YXAA
31.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
So, I was really tired of having papers in my home office. Both the wife and I looked around and read reviews of all sorts. This little guy was rated the best for the money. I just scanned 255 papers, one sided in 8 mins, no jams, no problems. I love this little guy. It is the size of a ruler, and fits neatly on my printer. I would buy more if I needed them. I recommend this for anyone who wants to clean up their home or work office and transport the files into PDF searchable files.
Вектрон-5WUDP
20.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
A survivor of the Minolta days I thought I'd have to farm my stuff out to a company and pay through the nose.My friend turned me on to the CanoScan and it's great.The machine doesn't create four different file names for a 4 slide scan. When you drag the files into their folder after the first scan you need to do the "do the same for each file and save the duplicate #'s created by a time assignment. I go back into the folders later and create unique #'s for each which is about a 10 second operation in each folder.
НеоВояжер-3HWEC
04.04.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I originally have a scanner, negative scanner and slide scanner separately.I mainly wanted one that scanned negatives. Mostly everywhere I see slides.I photographed as an enjoyment and for memories before digitals and computers with negatives.Now I found this scanner and gives me a chance to scan the negatives onto my computer under a folderand see and remember the memories. Not only do I now scan digitals but I can scan my negatives!This is an excellent device!
Сириус-9QCNT
03.04.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I don't know if I've ever been so happy with a case before, but it's just big enough to fit the compact scanner and is super easy to use. I enjoy how quickly I can throw the scanner back in the back with the cords and everything is ready to go and tidy. The handle is also great for carrying it around. I have it hanging on a hook by my home office desk too so it's ready to grab anytime I need to scan something on the go.
МехаРейнджер-3JOXA
13.10.2012
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I read all the reviews and bought the scanner. If you need a low volume OCR scanner you can't beat this (so far).However, once you start feeding it more than 3 pages it chokes.I've cleaned the rollers with alcohol/qtip even though it has less than 200 pages through it.When I try to scan more than 3 or 4 pages it sucks 2-5 pages in at one time.On the upside I'm going to be able to convert 10 years of bills to OCR PDF tonight with one touch (per stack). I'm finally getting around to it.On the downside it's going to take me about 5 to 10 times longer than I expected to feed individual pages into this scanner. At most I can get 2 to 5 pages to run though it at one time.Based on price, workload and capabilities, 3 stars. For the price it does a decent job. If it scanned more pages it would be a definite 5 star scanner package.Don't get tricked into buying the OCR software though. The bundled one touch does it already. If you truly need the extra Paperport features, you need a different scanner.
Супернова-1ZQFG
19.07.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I use it to digitize the old and mostly wornout 35mm black/white negatives (60+ rolls, finished) and color films (100+ rolls, on going).Pro:- Easy to setup and easy to use.- It's quiet.- At 4800dpi for my old black/white negatives, the result JPG is excellent. The level of details is amazing to my eyes. For the price, it's even more amazing! I previously tried one little negative digitizer sold in Costco, the result is ridiculously bad. The difference here is day and night. This one is for real.Minor Con:- Pretty slow at 4800dpi, more than 1 minute per frame.- Doesn't detect over/under exposed negative frames well. I couldn't find a manual option to force scan a frame at a fixed location. But for the adequately processed negatives, it works like a charm.- The color is quite a bit off when scanning color films, even though that can be corrected afterwards.Neutral:The negative loader is of decent quality, but not sure it will last. Hope I can find replacements if they break.Bottom line:An affordable high quality scanner for regular use.I hope this thing last at least till my job is done. This is a whole lot cheaper than asking some one else to do it for you. I am not even sure if the photo shops would take those old beat up negatives even if I am willing to pay for it,,,
Спектр-0MDPZ
07.12.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I've been scanning old family photos using the scanner on my 4-in-1 HP printer. With the last batch I was very dissatisfied with the quality. After a bit of research I ordered the CanoScan 9000F. This thing is great! The 600 DPI scans are way better than the same resolution scans from the scanner/printer. The speed is amazing. I was able to do 130 photos in about an hour, some of which was spent learning the software (which is very easy to use). I finally stopped even sitting down between scans. This scanner has to be at least ten times faster than the one of the printer.Honestly, I spent way more time arranging photos on the glass than I did waiting for the CanoScan 9000F to do its job. As soon as it had finished scanning, I starting removing the just scanned photos and laying out the next batch while it was saving the individual scans to disk. By the time I had the next set of photos laid out the software was waiting for me to press the "Scan" button. It took maybe 15-20 seconds to do the scan, then I was swapping photos again.I have just a couple very minor quibbles. When actively scanning it puts out a high pitched whine. It's not terrible, but it's a little annoying.The only other fault is that when scanning multiple photos the software needs for them to have quite a bit of separation for them to be identified as separate photos. This really isn't that big a deal. It scans so fast it's hardly worth even trying to work another photo into the layout. Just lay out four photos and don't worry that you maybe could have physically put six photos on the glass. The other two will scan in just seconds.I've only had it a few hours but I very happy with it. Installation was simple. It worked first time. And the results are great. Some of the photos I scanned are over 100 years old. They're going to need a lot of work to get rid of scratches and flecks. I wanted to be sure the scan was good enough quality to make it worth the effort. The CanoScan 9000F came through with flying colors. Or should I say flying blacks and whites?
Аэронавт-0FIJT
09.07.2012
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I've had this unit replaced twice now.In theory, this is an awesome product. When it's working, it very quickly scans large documents to a network location, which is great. The problem is that, most of the time, it suffers from multiple-feeds and paper jams. The paralegals in our office have resorted to single-page feeding this unit instead of putting a stack in and letting it run.I'm not sure who did the QA testing on this scanner. The 220p has occasional jams but seems to work pretty well once the rollers are broken in. This version, however, has never worked as expected.In short, it cost us a whole ton on money to buy a scanner that doesn't work as advertised. The unit creates more problems than it solves.In addition, the setup is non-intuitive. I hold MCSA/MCSE and SEC+ certifications and it took me a good afternoon to get everything up and running properly. The Fax portion needs to be removed, it's useless to anyone who isn't actually running a fax server in the office. Having the button on the primary interface is confusing. The email option only works with an open-relay, which is useless to 99% of all email setups. LDAP address book integration is limited to something like 99 contacts, which is unhelpful considering the size of most contact lists in the internet age.Avoid.
НаноРейдер-9ADTP
21.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Throughout the years I've had many different flat bed scanners (mostly Canon & Epson) that I use for quality scans and this is the best so far quality-wise. For this relatively low price (<$200) you really get almost professional quality and it is also fast. For either reflective or negative media, this scanner is one of the best, you cannot go wrong. Highly recommended.
Астрономад-2YQUD
04.02.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I decided to wait for the MKII version of this scanner and not to purchase the OLD MKI that is currently being offered. Fast, Sharp,Nice. Easy setup on my MacPro Tower. Great price, only a few dollars more than the OLD MKI version. I've been using my New Scanner all morning long...it is very quick to warmup (1-2 seconds) and Very Quick to scan...even maxed out to 1200dpi etc. :-) I really like how the power cord plugs directly into the unit (No external brick or anything like that)..just one simple and slender cord.
ХроноГость-1CRKD
01.01.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I have had this for several years. It is good within limits.1. It likes stacks of uniform size/ weight items.2. It picks up receipts in stacks, so you must always be aware of just what scanned last and made it to the screen3. It rarely scans straight4. The software has improved so that you can continue scanning to the same document after correcting a jam.5. It is pretty easy to save to a file and holds your last location/ type file in memory.6. When I switched to MAC, one of many bad news about Mac compatibilities occurred. It just won't let this unit scan to it, though it recognizes its presence. It is fairly portable.
Астрон-2XLTP
06.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I chose this Canon scanner to replace an HP flat-bed I had for many years. This model had great reviews on multiple sites, so I bought it. I couldn't be happier. The bundled software works great. The scanner has multiple ways to use it (front buttons or through the software. It works seamlessly with my graphics software and with my Adobe Acrobat (directly generate PDF's). Image resolution is superb. It comes with adapters to handle film and slides, but I haven't used them yet.Overall, I'd recommend this unit to anyone needing a scanner for regular home use or occasional office use.
ТехноНаблюдатель-6NXWG
12.09.2012
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I worked like a dog and FINALLY got two scans out of this machine. They look terrific - especially since they were ancient, faded and in really bad shape. But, the positives end there.The software that comes with this thing is buggy as all get-out. Crash, crash, crash! I run Windows 7 (64 bit). I'm used to there being problems with pre-Windows 7 products. But, this one sets the bar for problems!I was able to use this scanner with Vuescan - but that means I can't use the nifty restoration options that come with its own software. Since I do a lot of restoration of old photos, that was one reason I bought this model in the first place.I went to the Canon website and downloaded new installation files and drivers. That just made things worse! Now the software won't open at all! I've run out of time and patience. I'm going to mess with this some more tonight. If I can get it working, I'll post an update. Otherwise, I'm returning it. What a waste of time and effort so far!
Показаны отзывы 553-576 из 1154.
