Отзывы о Сканер Canon CanoScan LiDE 300
1164 отзывов пользователей о Canon CanoScan LiDE 300
Пользовались
Canon CanoScan LiDE 300?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
ИнфраГость-1WRYY
03.05.2003
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Perhaps the most versatile scanner yet. Has a true optical resolution of 3200dpi, which means it is very usable as a film (neg/trans) scanner. Canon includes neg/trans holders with the bundle, both for 35mm, medium formats, and 4x5. The software bundle includes Photoshop Elements, an OCR software, and some lesser programs. One great software program that comes built-in is the Canon FLARE 2 dust and scratch removal tool. Unlike ICE, FLARE 2 works on Kodachrome slides. It does not work on B&W. The one-button scanning ability is great if you do a lot of document scanning into Acrobat or an OCR program, but the single button film scanning really isn't useful, as you'll want to go into the Canoscan software and adjust the setting for most scans. I have scanned both transperencies and negatives and the results have been very good. When compared to my Nikon Coolscan IV (a 2600dpi film scanner) the results hold up very well. Several newer Velvia trans looked very good at 3200dpi, even when compared to the scans from the Nikon. The scans are very slow from the 9900F, but the fact that I can scan multiple slide or negs at one time makes up for the lack of speed. Scanning a 6x4.5 medium format neg the results were very sharp but a bit on the dark side. Note that I do not usually adjust for brightness during the scanning process and choose to wait until the image is dumped into Photoshop to do such work. Once adjusted, the scanned image looked excellent -- although the file was over 60mb in size. About the only complaint I have is that Canon chose to make this scanner 8.5x11 instead of 8.5x14 -- having the ability to scan legal size, or oversize prints, would have been a plus.I was very pleased with all of the scans I've done so far, including the 35mm and medium fomrat scans of negatives. The FLARE software really does work well, and is comparable to ICE. The 3200dpi scan gives some huge medium format file sizes, but that is what we want! An excellent scanner at a great price.
Небулоид-9YNOX
26.08.2004
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This scanner is great!! I cannot say enough good about it. I have had mine for over two years now and I take it with me everywhere my laptop goes including courthouses where I use it to copy marriages and other court documents for genealogy. No power cord needed and is every bit as good as any of my larger HP ones stuck at home.
Фотон-2TRIJ
18.03.2004
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Since I purchased my first Canon color printer 2 years ago, I've had nothing but positive experiences with Canon products. This scanner is no exception. It's replacing a VERY old parallel port scanner and I must say, technology has come a long, long way.To begin with, this scanner is incredibly fast. Connected to a USB 2.0 port, full page color scans at 300dpi take less than 30 seconds to complete. Most of the time, I use it to scan pencil sketches directly into Photoshop (extremely easy). In gray-scale mode, I can scan an entire page at 300dpi in ~10 seconds...blazingly fast! Top it off with easy setup, self powered USB (no power brick!), and sleek design, this scanner is a bargain.Unless you're doing hardcore, ultra high-res, ultra high-quality, professional graphics work, this is the scanner for you.
Пульсар-7UNLY
27.06.2004
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
The LiDE 50 will not scan at 1200dpi. I'm running a 1Ghz Athlon with 256MB of RAM and plenty of system resources in Windows 2000 Professional. The scans just "hang" at 20% or 90% and never finish. Also, parts in the internal mechanism of the scanner I recieved appear to have minor corrosion on them.I returned the unit and did not waste time with a replacement.
Альфа-Юнит-4FPUC
03.06.2003
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
...The product itself worked as the manufacturer described it. Not a single problem occured during my installation (WinXP), and the included pieces of software more than covered all my scanning needs. The product lived up to its promise to EASILY scan and e-mail, edit, and convert the scanned image to word processing text.It is extremely light and very easy to carry from location to location, and that was another great plus. It's ability to stand upright for those tight desk spaces is another feature I enjoy.My only complaint (and I use that word lightly) is the noise the scanner makes when it scans. I've not been around many scanners, but the ones I've heard are quieter than this product. I'd say the sound level is comparable to an inkjet printer pulling paper from its paper tray.Also, even after reinstalling the related software, the three buttons on the scanner don't work. I'm currently looking at the Canon website to see if I can get a more updated driver that would fix this problem. For now, I'm using the included software to do the scanning.All-in-all, I highly recommend that you purchase this scanner if you're for a 'more bang for the buck' scanner and low on the budget. However, for those of you who are professional artist and/or photographers, you might want to consider looking at more flashy scanners for your requirements; this product wasn't exactly blazing when scanning full-blown colored graphics....Mine was also a brand new product too, not refurbished, used, or "like-new" either. Regardless, it's still worth the price for new scanner owners and/or practical/common use.Highly recommended.
НеоВояжер-1FLXG
09.02.2004
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
If you are in the market for a simple, easy to use scanner for use at home or for light office work, this will suit you very well. Relative to its slim size, light weight, and USB power supply, the speed of this device is excellent. Obviously, bigger, more expensive scanners will be faster. But for home use, this is a great little machine. The USB support was painless for me and the lack of a bulky power supply or another AC cord is wonderful. Installed the software, connected, and scanned a photo in under 10 minutes. The quick start guide is easy to use and clearly produced. All in all, I am very pleased with the purchase. For the money, this is great little scanner.
Гравитон-4RJGP
07.05.2003
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Being an amatuer photographer, I wanted a scanner that could scan slides and negatives. The 5000F is a flatbed scanner so it can also scan documents which makes a very versitile and useful scanner. Usually flatbed scanners do NOT make good film and slide scanners; the 5000F is an exception. It's actually based on a rather decent CCD technology rather than the cheaper CIS chip (most flatbeds), which is the reason for the very good film/slide scanning performance. It has a special back-lit slot in the cover for slides and negatives. You can scan up to 3 negs or 2 slides at once. It also has an IR dust and scratch removal sensor that works fairly well (but not on scratches). The quality is very very good but the scans are quite slow, even with a USB-2 connection. You must remove a white backing board, insert the negs or slides in provided carriers, and position the carriers in the scanner. The graphics software, Archsoft PhotoStudio, is quite adequate but not nearly on the same level as Adobe Photoshop. There's MUCH additional software for creating photo albums, photo databases, OCR, etc.. Installation is very easy. It took me 20 minutes to install and start scanning after a bad day at work! The quality of the scans is excellent, the scanning software is very easy to use, the software package is quite comprehensive, scanning negs and slides requires some fumbling, and the scans are slow (but I've seen slower). The quality of the slide/negative scans is the MOST important feature to me and the 5000F delivers. **For the money**, I am VERY happy with the package overall.
НоваГость-3CXNA
01.12.2003
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
This scanner comes with a fully functioning Adobe Photoshop Elements 2.0 CD and the scanner is less costly than the software alone.Regarding the scanner itself, I purchased the scanner to digitize many photographs and documents. The image quality seems to be good. The scanner is powered by the USB connection so there is no external power cord. The speed isn't great but its sufficient for my needs.The scanner has a really great feature called multiscan which is its strongest and weakest feature. This allows you to put more than one photo in the scanner and the scanner scans in each photo into a separate JPG file. When this works it is awesome. Unfortunately about 25% of the time it can't find the edges of the photos correctly and the result is that you have to scan the photos separately.I also like the ability of being able to scan to PDF for documents.
Квазар-2SLTZ
19.04.2004
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
If you plan to use the Canon CanoScan LiDE 50 on Linux, you're currently out of luck. Of the LiDE scanners, the Sane (Scanner Access Now Easy - http://www.sane-project.org/) project only supports the LiDE 20 and 30. That's why only 3 stars.BTW, though this is labeled as a USB 2.0 product, it also works with USB 1.1.
Пульсар-7AQXW
24.11.2003
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
This scanner has probably good hardware but you can expect big problems with software. The colors of photos scanned from negative film depend on the other shots on the same strip. Unfortunately even if you tell the scanner not to use color correction it does it anyway. Scanning 20+ negs with 3200dpi takes more than 5 hours. It was more or less acceptable for me if I could expect normal result. Unfortunately it happens often that after hours of waiting you have to delete pictures with heavy blue cast and put strips into the scanner in another order and hope that it will work (sometimes it helps).I have asked from Canon customer care if there is another software or a way to configure this one somehow. They answered that I have to ask from Adobe. :-)
Лунатик-0IMBA
25.02.2004
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I run XP and had no trouble whatsoever installing and using the scanner software.The adobe photoshop elements that comes with this scanner is worth the price alone.There is one glitch however, I have a USB Canon printer and neither will work if both are connected to the computer. I think this may be because the printer is the USB 1.1 and the scanner is 2.0 but I'm not sure.
Плазмоид-4NPLF
25.05.2003
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I bought this scanner because of the Canon name. My last scanner was a Canon, as is my printer. Both have performed flawlessly. I chose this particular model because of the USB interface so I could use it with both my Mac and my Hewlett Packard IBM Clone, and because it has an attachment to scan negatives.As a basic scanner, it's great. Good color. Good sharpness. Though, it's a somewhat larger than you might expect based on the pictures. But don't be misteken -- this is not a professional film scanner. It's an OK mid-range consumer product. Colors tend to be off slightly when scanning negatives using the "dust and scratch" mode. Also, the "dust and scratch" mode is not available in resolutions over 600 dpi. I get the sense that otherwise, this is a powerful piece of hardware. The problem is that the software for it is horrible. The Mac and Windows versions are identical, and neither is really up to the task at hand. They are poorly laid out with no clear-cut way to perform simple tasks. If you're scanning into something like Photoshop, it can control the scanner through the TWAIN driver. But if you just want to make a quickie black-and-white scan of a piece paper to fax to someone, it's too much of a hassle. Again, hardware quality is great. But the software leaves a lot to be desired.
НаноРейдер-9DMKD
14.09.2003
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I have purchased two of these scanners because I was hoping that the first one was defective. It was, and I think the second one was too! The closest I can come to describing the problem is to say that there was condensation under the flatbed glass. It dried and left a residue that shows up on every scan. The first time I thought this was a fluke (although I had read a review that said it happened to them.) so I returned it and ordered another. The same thing happened with this one. When I called Canon to ask about the problem they played dumb and said they hadn't heard of this problem. Well it happend twice to me and at least once to another review so it does exist. The biggest problem I am going to have now is finding another scanner that has the multi-scan feature. It was very cool to pop four pictures on the flatbed, scan them, and have them come out as four different JPEGS. What to do?
МехаРейнджер-9TQXP
23.01.2003
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I was researching scanners for a long time and finally debated between the Epson 2400 and the Canoscan 5000F which cost about the same. The Epson 2450 Photo seemed to have better image quality but cost about twice as much, and the Canoscan 8000 is only a bit faster and allows you to scan more slides at once than the 5000 model. Reviews seemed to favor the Canon model for color accuracy and the Epson model for speed. Moreover, Epson's support for Mac OS X is flaky and you have to download extra drivers from Epson's website.Well, I got the Canoscan and I'm very pleased with my purchase. Both image quality and speed surpassed my wildest expectations as I had an Umax Astra 1200 before. The scans are fast and colors are absolutely brilliant. Since I mostly scan color slides, I was again pleased to find out that the quality is really, really good. Scanning slides at 300dpi for 4x10 prints is a good compromise of quality and speed. You can scan two slides at once, which takes about 5 minutes. Slide scanned at 2400dpi take about 10 minutes and result in very large files of 250MB or more in Photoshop. Again, scans at this resolution are absolutely brilliant and are great for 8x10 enlargements. The local camera shop can't produce any better enlargements.Canon supports Mac OS X out of the box. No need to send in a card to Epson or download beta-version Twain drivers from their web site. Just install the software, reboot, plug in the scanner and you're all set. The included software works well with PhotoShop and offers many customization options. All in all, if you're looking for a high quality scanner at a reasonable price, the CanoScan 5000F is probably the best you can get.
Квантум-6IESR
22.10.2003
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
This is my third attempt at using a scanner. Microtek is for people who know what they are doing, i.e., not me, and Epson 1660 wouldn't work with my eMac, so after much research and with the great Amazon price, I decided to order the LiDE50. I had some trouble installing the software (my fault) but have been able to scan with no problems. Having to use Classic is a drawback, but one I can live with since I'm able to get the scanner to work. It doesn't seem to make much noise at all, little beeps like R2D2, and its diminutive size is great for my small desk. It is very sleek and seems to be well made. Since I've only had the scanner a few days my first impressions may change later on, but right now I am very pleased with the LiDE50.
ИнфраГость-4CYXU
09.08.2003
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I bought this scanner because I wanted quality with out breaking the bank. I am running this on P4 1.8ghz with 1GB of RAM. I am using the USB 2.0. The scanning speed is outstanding if you are scanning photos at 300 dpi or less. 600dpi is definitely acceptable. Scanning at 1200 DPI, well lets just say I never let it complete and set it back to 600 DPI.Another reason why I bought this was it scans 3 negatives at once. If your primary reason for buying this scanner is for the negative scanning, you may be better off buying a film scanner. The quality of the negative scans are great, but it is a slow process.I have not done OCR scanning yet.I have not done the multiple photo scan.The only thing that really annoys me are the buttons in the front. I sware I must hit one of the buttons accidently every 5th opening of the scanner cover.For the money it is really good scanner. I would recommend it at this point. I will update my review once I have done OCR and Multiple Photo scanning.
Нейрон-6DDHG
08.09.2003
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I bought this scanner after a couple of weeks of research at consumerreports.com, epinions.com, amazon.com, etc. Finally decided to buy this unit for my small office graphic scanning needs (small web design firm). I couldn't be happier.It is VERY easy to install the software and get the scanner up and running -- less than 10 minutes! Unbelievable. I previously had a scanner that took forever to warm up and almost every time gave me a conflict error with my printer (I had to daisy chain the printer and scanner).The USB/power cable is a fantastic idea. I just started scanning some previous magazine work I did and the results are good -- I have yet to work out the specifics of adjustment. However, due to the ease of which this installed and was ready to use, I have no doubt that this will be a piece of cake also.I highly recommend this scanner.
Лунатик-7SKCI
11.04.2003
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
The one thing that impressed me most about this scanner was the ease with which it interfaced with my hp printer. I just went through the normal install (on Windows XP) and every function that I've tried out on this scanner, including the function buttons on the front, worked with every peripheral I have on the first go. I was away from the tech scene for a few years while I was in the military, and I definitely don't remember any periphal being this easy to interface with other components of differing brands. Other than that, the picture quality is great and the speed is just fine for one or two page scans. I got pictures to come out perfectly clear with up to 5x magnification. It might be good for higher magnifications, too, I just haven't tried them yet. Some people have complained about the speed, but if you want to scan a 50-page report, you need to take it to Kinko's instead of using a home flatbed. Or you could spring for a business-class scanner; remember, this one is only seventy bucks. It comes with some decent software, too; I'm looking forward to trying the OCR, where it turns scanned print into text that can be edited. Maybe that's a common feature nowadays, but it seems pretty cool to me. I did some shopping before I bought this thing, and it is definitely the best home-use scanner that I found.
Эксопилот-1JRTN
09.12.2003
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I will keep this short. My last complete review was not posted. I bought the Canon LiDE 50 from Amazon & installed the supplied drivers. The drivers do not support XP, & the Canon Toolbox is very buggy supporting PDF. Went to Canon's site. It states XP users should not install the drivers that come with the unit! Their update is also very buggy. If your stuck try unloading all Canon stuff & restart your computer 3 times. Then install their update. It might work some of the time now.
Нейрон-2EHRT
08.11.2003
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
this scanner is good and bad. it's cheap and it is USB powered. nice. super easy to set up and imports very quickly with photoshop. black and white images are okay. i am having problems with the color scans. they are to saturated. i have spent hours trying everything. importing through its own software, through photoshop, they just are not that great. also, works with MAC OS X but only through photoshop. its own software works in X, but then only opens images in classic. strange.for the price, it gets the job done. don't expect anything amazing out of it. it is a low priced portable scanner.
Аргонавт-5SJRB
29.12.2003
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Hello, I purchased this for christmas 2003. Right out of the box I had the same problem as "wshiii from Philadelphia, PA" The glass was dirty on both sides and all the images (no matter what the resolution) had white spots all over them. I will call canon tonight to see what they can do. If they cannot fix it, I will look elsewhere for a replacement
Нейрон-8VBBL
23.09.2003
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
This scanner has very nice features. It's very slim and functional. Image scans are fast and have good image quality. The ScanGear is very simple to use. You can scan multiple photos at the same time and have it on separate windows in Photoshop (not included). Best of all, it's compatible with WinXP and is USB2.0 certified.Works well with Adaptec XHub4 for Notebooks too! That is if you're short on usb ports like me. Tried it with Targus' Cable-Powered USB2.0 Hub, didn't work. I suggest you use it with Adaptec hubs and adapters coz they're the ones certified by Canon to be compatible with the scanner.
Пандорец-1IOXX
28.04.2003
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I was a bit hesitant to buy this scanner given its low cost, but I find myself very happy that I did. It is very easy to install (just remember to follow instructions and install the software before connecting the scanner to your PC).I've scanned about 50 photos and a dozen documents the past week, with very good results. Documents come out clean and crisp, and photos scan very accurately. What more can you ask for?The only complaint is that it is slower than other scanners I've used. And more DPI scans are very slow. Given that I am only scanning a limited number of documents, that is not a big deal for me. I find the 3 buttons upfront very useful and easy to setup. The first button I use for scanning documents, the second for copying documents, and the third for copying photos.Re: copying photos, I've had inconsistent results scanning multiple photos at once. In multi-scan mode, the software is supposed to automatically recognize and seperate multiple photos, yet I experienced inconsistent results. Not a biggie for me, and I remain very pleased.This scanner is a great value for the money.
Странник-0CGIT
19.11.2002
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
My father always told me I would never go wrong with a Canon. Canon has proven my father's point time and time again, and they don't fail to do so with the 5000c. I made the mistake of purchasing a lesser-name scanner to save myself [money]. When the quality and reliability were found lacking, I packed the lesser-name up and left the store with the 5000f.I'm so thrilled by the quality i don't know if I can write a detailed, fact-based review on the scanner! All I really need to say is IT'S INCREDIBLE! DON'T EVER BUY ANY OTHER BRAND! However, I know you want details. Here they are: The film/slide scans are AMAZING! They're crisp and clear --honestly unparalleled by any scanner (even professional models) I have ever used. Many scanners will blur your slides or provide unacceptable resolution for any serious utility. Not the case here.Standard scans are great. I MUST mention the FARE (Film Automatic Retouching and Enhancement) technology employed by the 5000F. How many times have you been digging through your storage to find a great old photo that has been marred by the hands of time? Using FARE, you won't spend hours retouching the photo in your photo-editing software --it's all done AUTOMATICALLY! No example picture could ever explain how well it works. Go to a store and try it yourself. You WILL be blown away.All of these features are tied together with a USB 2.0 interface. Gone are the days where you listen to your scanner scan, stop, send, scan, stop, send. With the increased bandwidth of this new technology scanning is quick and easy.I'll say it to you this time: You can't go wrong with a Canon!
Дроид-1LVXO
13.01.2003
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I hooked this scanner up to a Pismo Powerbook running 10.2.3, right after downloading all the current drivers from the Canon website. Set up was very simple, although a tad lengthy, as there are two plug-in installations that need to take place in a specific order. The installations themselves were quick.The scanner DOES run natively in OSX. It took me a few attempts to figure out the finer workings of "Canon Toolbox", the program which allows you to scan images from scanner to file. BE SURE TO CLICK "Use Scanner Driver..." button for the advanced settings. I was running into a problem where 1200 DPI images were scanning like absolute junk...grainy, small, and totally worthless. After a few frustrating attempts I realized that the file format was the issue. SCANNING TO PICT FILES IS USELESS, but change the file format to JPG and the images scan and save as one would expect. I'm wondering if other people's comments of this scanner being "too grainy" have to do with the default PICT file format.The scanner feels a bit slower than my ol' UMAX, but that thing only scanned up to 300 DPI, so I would image the increase in resolution has to take more time. I really like the slim design...it's about 20% the size of my old scanner.So far, I like it enough. I'll updated this review in a few months after I've had the chance to really put it to the test.
НоваГость-4FFQO
21.11.2002
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I bought this scanner from here. But I cost me about 4 days to figure out how to let it work under win XP. I have the digitalcamara so I don't need to scan picture. the only thing I need for the scanner is to scan the book or text into editable text.But the software omnipage SE is not working under Win XP. I search the help from this company and sent e-mail last weekend but the e-mail system is not working.Monday and tuesday I called the 800 number the 800 number's function is to provide a pay phone number. After I dailed the pay phone number and waiting about 20 minutese still the recording. Tuesday I sent e-mail again and again, one of them was accidentally working. Wendsday I got a reply from the technicalservice. He told me that this software (omnipage SE) is working on Win XP because he got no complain ! I sent him the screenprint out error and the menu word (the manu said only working under win98, 2000, NT while the box say it is working under win XP). The service person Thurday sent me e-mail said his company can't see the attachment files. So, I sent the word description and also created a hotmail account and give him the account number and password and let him log on this account to see the attachment files.I got no reply Thusday. So, I will return this product. My suggestion is that unless you are familar this product and expect you are not going to use Win XP you should order this product. You should not expect to get the technical service unless you are waiting a week or more!Good luck.
Синтрон-0UWYW
31.08.2003
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I have a fairly new computer with a 2GHz AMD, 1gig ram, onboard USB 2.0 and plenty of HD space. The computer would recognize the scanner and install the drivers, but the scanner would not operate. I purchased and installed an adaptec USB 2.0 controller hoping it would solve the problem since Canon certified compatibility with it, and it still didn't work. My old scanner still works OK with the new computer, and I managed to get this new canon LiDE 50 to work with my old computer with USB 1.1!!! Go figure. I would definately not recommend.
Астероид-3IPBE
09.09.2003
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I had a Canon FB630 that went belly up so I bought a Epson perfection scanner because Consumer Reports rated it a fast scanner. Yeah Right! Its fast alright, after it takes time to warm up. So I sold the Epson and bought the Canon Lide 50, Damm! I thought it was the second coming of Christ! No warm up, goes right into a scan and its fast. The scans come out very clean. I would highly recommend this scanner to anyone. The only thing I miss is the Fax button on the canoscan toolbox.
Капеллан-4CNQX
25.09.2003
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Initial item ordered was faulty. Bad logic board. Contacted Canon directly and, using their 'instant replacement' policy, they fedexed me a replacement the NEXT DAY!! Their service dept. is superior. Replacement works great! USB 2.0 hi-speed is fast. Well-made unit. No-brainer to operate :-). Highly recommend.
Супернова-1RMGA
06.03.2003
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
1. Software installation was easy and straightforward.2. Connecting the scanner to the computer was easy.3. Full color preview took 20 seconds.4. Full color scan took 60 seconds (file size was 18 MB).5. The scanner is extremely light, and thin.I just scanned a color photo I am really impressed with the scan quality. I highly recommend this scanner for any home user or general business user. Since I just hooked it up 15 minutes ago, I gave it 4 stars because I don't know how durable it is. For the {money} I paid I am extremely satisfied with the Canon LiDe 30. My other scanner is a SCSI UMAX 1260, which is a 3 pass color scanner, I bought in 1995 for {a higher price}.* I have read reviews from users who said the scanner is extremely slow, and others who said it was fast (as it is on my computer). This difference is caused by the USB version (1.0 or 2.0) that is installed in your motherboard BIOS. To really appreciate this scanner, make sure your computer motherboard BIOS is running USB 2.0!
Спектр-6KXHK
04.05.2003
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I have had this scanner for a year adn a half and have put nearly 5000 slides through it. I am happy with the overall quality of the scans for what I paid for this. I use this as a proofing tool-- I only get my negatives developed (when I shoot prints) and then scan them to proof them. Or if I shoot slides and want to put them on the internet or retouch them. The scanner will make up to an 8x12 at 400dpi. which is okay. Again you must look at what you are paying. The neat scratch removing features that the upper models have would be nice but again repeating for the price this is a great little scanner. I have been happy. I even got it to work in XP but it did take some research. Info for installing in XP or 2000 can be found [online.]
НоваГость-1IWAK
20.08.2003
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Beautiful imaging quality, quick, quiet, small footprint. I'm impressed by the whole package. Works great with my Canon i550 printer. Quickest install of hardware that I've ever done. All function perform as promised (all buttons work, etc.). A very pleasant suprise. Note: This scanner was picked as the best available under 100 Pounds Sterling by U.K. PC Mag. I agree.
НоваГость-4WYSO
20.04.2003
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I wanted a no frills, easy-to-use scanner. Even though I have never had good luck with Canon, I bought this one based on the recommendations others gave, especially on its compatibility with Windows XP. I had a LOT of problems getting it running. It turns out that the USB on my laptop does not send enough power to run the scanner. Neither the tech support of Canon or Compaq (my computer) helped, but my dad suggested buying a USB hub that has an AC plug. This worked, so if you have problems I recommend trying that. Otherwise, once it I got it running, it seems great. It's kind of slow, but does the job and takes up MINIMUM desk space.
Астрон-2FCNH
22.08.2002
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Canon's new LiDE 30 is certainly a step up in overall image quality when compared to other slimline scanners, especially for under ... I was surprised at how good this scanner was for the price. Canon's adjustable Z-lid feature, a much-needed scanner improvement, is a must if you scan from bulky sources like books or magazines. All photo and text scans made were very crisp and accurate. (Poorer photos will need futher software manipulation to improve their quality beyond the originals.) No power cord--power drawn through the USB cable from the computer--and the lightweight portability of this scanner make it ideal for use with laptops. It can even be set up vertically if space is a problem. The only real drawback to the Canon LiDE 30 is that's it's a bit slow--20 seconds (approx.) for a 4" x 5" photo. Still, in this price range and for a 1200 x 2400 scanner, that's faster than most of the other models at this price. Like most included software packages, the software that comes with the LiDE 30 is adequate for most home uses--though no doubt some can benefit from other scanner software packages available in the aftermarket. If your scanning needs are modest-to-moderate, and your budget demands tight, this is definitely the scanner for you. The best, bar none, in terms of over all quality in this price range that's been offered to consumers up to now.
Лунатик-9SRJW
26.11.2002
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
What's great about this scanner:The slim, unbulky size. It doesn't take up a lot of room and I like the sleek silver look of it.Of course looks aren't everything. It is very purposeful for me, I bought it to scan photos onto my computer. I wanted a high resolution but not a high price and this was the one scanner that met my needs. When I put my scanned photos on Webshots for my albums there, they are high resolution (1460 x 1028) which really pleases me. The software that comes with it is easy to use and has some great features, such as making magazine pictures look really nice after you scan them. There is a blurring feature that makes magazine photos look a little better that I have used often. You can draw on your pictures and my son and I have had some comical fun with this. This scanner can accept books and other bulky things to scan even though its slim. Since I like to be able to "save" great pictures I see in library books, I appreciate this.In case it helps, I have Windows Me on my computer.
Капеллан-6WFFO
29.01.2003
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I bought this scanner knowing full well that it was not the fastest on the market. However, the price, ease of operation,and picture quality make it a very desirable scanner for the money. I've owned a Canoscan N650U for about 2 years now and have had no problems. I have upgraded operating systems many times and they all seem to handle this series scanners without incident. I'm now running WinXP Pro with a XP2600+ processor and I must say I'm impressed. If you are looking for a compact scanner with good looks and great resolution at a affordable price then this is a great buy. The included software makes it easy for anyone to get quality scans with little practice and is very user friendly. Nice job Canon!
ИнфраГость-0IIYW
13.04.2003
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Please note, this product is "usb 2.0 full speed" which is NOT "usb 2.0 high speed" - it's actually what we all use to know as "usb1.1". Buyer beware - it's the manufacturer's way of misleading consumers. That being said, the previous reviews claiming better performance using true usb2.0 ports on a computer are not valid (for the bottleneck is always going to be the output of the scanner itself).
НеоВояжер-9QEQB
28.02.2003
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
All around great scanner. It's super thin and small and because it's USB bus powered there's only one cable. Scan quality is quite good, though the scans could be a little faster...speed is only average compared to other scanners I've used in the price range. Drivers work fine with Mac OS X 10.2.The thing I like best, though, is the LED illumination. No bulky flourescent lamp that has to turn on and off and can burn out. Very sweet.
Спектр-0SIDZ
19.02.2003
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I received delivery in an unbelievable 21 hours! I had gone out and examined the Cannon 5000F before I placed the order with Amazon.com. I've installed it on Windows XP and am pleased beyond expectations. I primarily wanted it for film and slide copying. It does that and copying and photo scanning up to my expectations and standards. I 've been involved in photography (darkroom included) for years and find this great to bring my old technology up into the 21 century.
Гравитон-8CXPV
21.02.2003
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I purchased the scanner with a bit of apprehension, due to the price, and the disparity with other scanners. It seemed a wee bit costly -- not overly so, just a bit. Knowing that Canon is a good company, and knowing that poor scanners truly a horrible experience, I bit the bullet and bought it. The software, combined with the scanner, are superb. I highly recommend this product.
Фотон-7DQEA
23.08.2002
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I thoroughly researched scanners before I selected the CanoScan N122OU. Several brands and models included the high resolution output which I need for my photography hobby work, but the deciding factors for this model for me were:1) It is very thin and lightweight -- PLUS it stores vertically on my desk. (My older scanner was heavy, big, and took up LOTS of room.)2) I had confidence in the Canon brand - and still do.Having made the choice, I have had no regrets. It has been easy to set up and use (I can even use it while it is in its vertical position - quite a handy feature that I didn't realize it offered when I was making my selection.)I am pleased and would recommend this to anyone needing a high quality, easy-to-use and easy-to-store scanner.
Альфа-Юнит-6MYSF
25.12.2002
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This film scanner has resulted in excellent results in scanning in older b&w and color negatives and positives. I have created books documenting past travels with little effort. It is not compatible with computers without scsi ports.
Фотон-7CTJJ
13.08.2001
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
First I would like to say that all of you who are buying this scanner as your first are spoiled rotten! My last scanner was purchased about four years ago and served me well. Still works but I decided to upgrade becuase it's quality isn't up to par with my needs anymore. THough it was long ago, I still vividly recall the three days it took to get it, the scsi card, and the drivers all working happily together.This scanner on the other hand had a step by step guide that had me up and running in only two minutes, no joke, didn't even have to reboot.The quality is great. The color balance is excellant, incredibly sharp, and no artifacts or saw edges of any kind. The saturation seemed a little low at defualt so I tinkered with the settings some to get it where wanted.Another big bonus is the film scanner. I've seen other scanners that seem to have rough "quick and dirty" adapters and so forth but this scanner is truly optimized for the purpose. It has a light built into the lid, instead of a mirror system, to ensure balanced light. The image from negative scans is a little soft, I assume that this is cuased by the slight bends in the film. Its not hardly noticable unless studied side by side with a print. The startling aspect is the color. It is extremly vivid. I was rather shocked when I looked at some picures of a past vacation. The perfect color brought back realism that was lacking from the print which was color balanced by a lab technician.I'm looking forward to using the film scanning function for professional purposes but I would also like to point out that is is a very handy feature even for just home use. I'm sure that some of you are like me, with boxes of negatives in the closet and prints scattered to the far ends of the earth. Instead of paying expessive lab fees for all 10,000 of them to processed, I can just browse through them, scanning the ones that look ineteresting and emailing some to buddies.
Астрономад-5ZAEB
12.09.2002
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I purchased the LiDE 30 at an Apple retail store based on the fact that the box and several reviews said it was OS X compatible. However, the software would only install in the Classic environment. The Canon website also proclaimed it would not have an OS X driver for the either the LiDE 20 or 30 until sometime this month (Sept. '02). When I returned the scanner, a tech at the store confirmed it was incompatible with OS X. In other words, Canon is not only are blowing smoke at consumers, but have run a number on Apple.
Интеллектор-6SELL
13.10.2002
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
got this scanner out of the box. five minutes later i had an exact reproduction of a family photo on my desktop. is simple the right word? how about "best scanner for the money."my only hope is that canon produce a film negative adapter that will fit this scanner. i'll never get rid of it.
Альфа-Юнит-8YXXF
13.09.2002
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Canon did a great job on this CIS scanner. The image 'looks' good & sharp. But be aware,if you compare with source image, the reproduced colors are not exactly same as original. Impressive scanner, but I'd recommend D1250U2F. Images from D1250U2F is much easier to enhance with sw like photoshp.
Гиперион-5KFIB
17.08.2002
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
When you get it, check the inside glass with flash light before you plug it in. Mine was peppered with grime and dust; Scans show these as white specks everywhere! I'm returning this product from company that does no quality checks on its product. Mine also had DOA film scanner.You can be sure I'll try to avoid all future canon products.
Супернова-2VZXR
14.08.2001
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
The sleek design and the high resolution of the scanner attracted me in the first place. But to my surprise, I had big, big troubles to install the device on my labtop which is running windows 98 first edition. It supposed to be plug and play, right? How come I will be so dumb unable to install the device? So the next day I tried my friend's laptop which happens to be running Windows 98 too. Well, It took me less than 5 minutes to setup the device driver, and get it functional. But back to my own home, I still had same problem to set it up. I tried install the hardware manually through the control panel, selecting the "have disk" option, or the "browse" option, but the installation process keeps telling me "no compatible driver was found" on the installation CD-ROM. The installation instructions that comes with the box were so simple, that it tells you nothing except to unplug the device to do the reinstall. The menu said black and white that the scanner supports Windows 98. Later on I realized that my firend's laptop is running Windows 98 Second Edition, while mines is only the first release of Win 98! This made the whole difference! I tried to download from Canon website. The results were the same. Finally I had the conclusion that the device driver is NOT compatible with Win 98 first edition. At that time, I had wasted a whole week of my leisure time! Not to mention I had to return the item ...
Показаны отзывы 1065-1112 из 1164.
Похожие товары с лучшей оценкой
Wizemart © 2026.
Рекомендательная система по умному выбору товаров по отзывам и рейтингам
