Отзывы о Сканер Canon CanoScan LiDE 300
1154 отзывов пользователей o Canon CanoScan LiDE 300
Пользовались
Canon CanoScan LiDE 300?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Скромный эксперт
01.07.2017
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
<промежуток класс="">удивительные трата чернил!
<промежуток класс="">очень впечатлен тем, как много чернил эта машина может тратить! Она очищает себя после каждого печати, да так, что в 1 месяц я уже не один раз напечатать в цвете и уже цветные картриджи до менее чем половины. Когда она печатает качество очень хорошее, сканирует хорошо и выполняет, как ожидалось, это просто конспиролога в меня на мысль, что прошивка не предназначена для этого, так что вы должны купить больше чернил, чем необходимо.
Зета-Орион-6XWUW
11.02.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I tend to have about 3 scanners at any given time: a higher-end flatbed (for photos and film) and two economy models for my antiqarian book business, one newer with a 'good' glass surface (few, if any, scratches) and the second-newest one which usually has scratches, used for rougher items. In other words, I use scanners quite a bit and know a good one when I see it; and this new MKII version of the 9000F is quite good.SPEED: The most important aspect of a scanner for someone who does a lot of scanning is speed: speed in warming up, speed in scanning in high-res. The 9000F MKII is excellent at both, better than my $700 Epson V700 (with one exception). The difference lies in the LED technology of the new Canon. My first thought was that LED may produce inferior results but this is certainly not the case, after analyzing the results. And because the LEDs don't need warming-up, 'warm-up time' is a thing of the past. The one exception in speed tests is scanning at high-res with Canon's FARE software turned on: very slow indeed. However, I personally always make raw scans and then batch-process them in Photoshop, so this is not a factor for me. With FARE turned off, the speed is very good, even in high-res.SOFTWARE: The second most important aspect of a scanner is software, both the user interface and the correction software. Canon's UI software has always been inferior to Epson in that it is dumbed-down and kind of clunky in comparison to the customizable and fluid Epson UI. However, there are now big improvements in this area: I was amazed - really, amazed - at how well Auto Scan Mode works: excellent recognition, cropping, scanning and saving files in just one click. Scary good, really. Auto Document Fix (as opposed to photo fix with FARE) is also quite advanced and, for example, makes text as clear as possible - automatically. And while settings are fully customizable, as Epson's are, Canon still lags behind a bit, clearing your settings at times (Epson requires the user to reset, which is better). One software feature that, again, amazed me, was 'Gutter Shadow Correction': as a book dealer I often scan pages within books; this feature automatically recognizes the gutter shadow (the crevice between pages) and eliminates it. Wow.QUALITY: Let's make this simple: today, even low-end scanners have incredible quality. You are getting what 5 years ago would be a $1,000 professional scanner. To get caught up in dpi and microscopic analysis of scan results is a bit too much when you're talking about a $170 scanner. The highest usable dpi for reflective media is about 3600; anything beyond that is useless (i.e., the scanner's dpi exceeds that of the photo you're scanning!). For film - certain, high-res film - maybe 4800dpi comes into play. Beyond that, get a film scanner - that's why God invented them. To expect the Ferrari of imaging devices for $170 is a bit much. This is why I've always had a separate photo scanner in addition to lower-end scanners for other uses. The 9600 dpi CCD sensor on this scanner is superb. This 9000F MKII has tremendous image quality; don't let anyone convince you otherwise.One unexpected feature is the fact that the scanner includes not only 35mm film capability, but medium format as well. On the downside, Canon no longer bundles Photoshop Elements with the scanner.As for new bells and whistles, the major differences between the original 9000F and the MKII (aside from the improved optical quality) are the external 'EZ Buttons': touch a button for instant copy/scan/email/pdf functions.All in all, an excellent scanner and well worth the money.
Аэронавт-9JCFI
31.12.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
The other reviews outline the basic use and function of this scanner pretty well, so I don't want to rehash info that's already out there. Instead, I thought I'd compare this scanner, (the scan-tini) to the magic wand hand scanner VuPoint Solutions Magic Wand Portable Scanner (PDS-ST410-VP)as well as to your basic, all-in-one printer based scanner, AND to the scanner application on my android phone (yep - they have them and they work pretty decent..). Cam Scanner: http://www.amazon.com/IntSig-Information-Co-Ltd-CamScanner/dp/B004T5K3OK/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1325345708&sr=8-2 (The "insert product link" wouldn't work, so hoping the direct link above makes it through amazon editing. If not, enter android application camScanner into the amazon search window)***Magic wand scanner: I first bought the magic wand scanner to supplement my printer based scanner. The advantage to this magic wand scanner, is that you can scan pages that are still bound in a book or journal much easier than trying to squash them down on your printer's scanner while also squashing the lid down on it all as well. For this, the scanner works great. For example, say you need a few reference pages from a huge tome of a book that is at your facilities medical library (or any library, including your home one for that matter..)You open your book to the desired pages, turn on the wand scanner, and slowly slide it down the page you want to copy. The printer holds the images in memory until you attach it to your computer via USB, then you can download and enhance, trim, and otherwise edit the image as needed. This is very handy, however, the downside is that you have to have a steady hand and slide the scanner over the pages in a pretty uniform, smooth manner. If you go too fast, twist slightly, etc. you can end up with blurred images or areas of stretched looking print. However, doing it correctly is much easier than it would seem, so this isn't common.***Scan-tini scanner: This is significantly bigger than the magic wand - you wouldn't be able to stuff it into your purse as easily as the wand scanner. (So, if you're scanning stuff on the sly - which, of course, I am not advocating in any way, it would be more challenging...) However, the advantages of the scan-tini over the wand is that it is a much quicker process - the scan-tini has a document feeder which slides the paper through much faster than when hand scanning with the wand. Also, because it self-feeds, there is less chance of a distorted image. If you are scanning detached papers it is a great way to go. However, if what you want to scan is bound or attached in a book, journal or binder, you are completely out of luck with this scanner - you wont be able to scan that no-way, no-how, unless you rip the pages out.***All-in-one printer based scanner: This is what we all tend to have and it is great for most all applications. While difficult, you CAN scan pages from a bound book or journal without having to rip them out, but you will have distortion if you cant smash the page fully flat onto the glass plate of the printer/scanner. You will also end up with black edges anywhere light sneaks in - which is why we also try to smoosh the printer/scanner's lid down so tightly and hope we don't break the thing. However, for your basic detached papers of various sizes, textures, etc. this type of scanner tends to provide the highest quality image with the least distortion (as a previous reviewer mentioned, the scan-tini can have problems feeding paper with different textures)***Android phone scanner, camscanner full version: After buying my wand scanner, but before receiving the scan-tini, I downloaded the camscanner app for my Android phone. To be honest, this scanner - believe it or not - is the one I use most frequently when out and about or in a hurry now. Essentially you are using the phone's camera function to take a picture of your document. The camscanner program then allows you to trim it to the correct size, enhance the image, convert it to a pdf, then email it to your email or anyone elses. The first time I used it I had to sign some document and get it to my husband. I decided to give it a go as I was in a rush & didn't want to fire up the whole PC system as I was trying to get out the door. I sent the "scanned" document to him and he had no idea it had come from my phone. It was a pdf, the resolution was good,and it quickly took care of the issue. The challenges with the camscanner is that the document must be on a flat surface, in a well lit area, and if you are at an angle rather than directly over it you can have distortion of the image. It isn't perfect, but in a pinch it is great. For taking pictures of pages bound in a book or journal, arguably the wand scanner is better, as you don't have to worry about the lighting in the room and other variables you have with the phone. For bound books if the lighting isn't directly on the page you can have dark areas similar to when you sq
Гелиос-8JBKJ
06.05.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I hemmed and hawed about buying this for a few weeks before I pulled the trigger. I already own a work-group quality Samsung laser printer (which is a workhorse), a Canon 24-bit flatbed scanner, a Canon inkjet, and a stand-alone fax machine. The sheer amount of paperwork passing through my hands on a weekly basis really demanded getting a new scanner with an automatic document feeder, as the piles of stuff seems to be getting larger, not smaller -- which was my goal. I started doing my research on flatbeds w/ADFs and quickly concluded that: a) they are all way overpriced, and b) all models less than $750 appear to suffer from one major design flaw or another, and are all basically junk. I next turned my attention to getting a laser all-in-one, and selling the equipment that I currently have. I quickly concluded that my current gear is of much higher quality than anything that I would be replacing it with, and most all-in-ones less than $500 are also junk. After giving up, I stumbled across the Fujitsu units, and became aware of the mobile scanners on the market. Then I came across this little baby. This unit has the advantage over the Fujitsu that it uses a standard Windows TWAIN driver, and will therefore be visible to all scanner-aware applications that you may use.Pros:- Appears very well-made, despite being small and for mobile use- Scans at a very decent speed using 300 DPI- Can be used with the included software (which is excellent) on a dedicated PC, or a lite version of it (in the scanner ROM) on any PC without installing the software- Scans can be initiated from the PC or from the scanner- Can be used with or without a dedicated AC adapter. Runs slower on USB power, but is still pretty fast. For those who want something in the middle of the road, you can use 2 USB ports for higher USB-supplied power and higher scanning speed- Cleverly designed and obviously well thought out- Scans both sides of the document in 1 pass- Automatically skips blank pages when scanning in duplex mode -- awesome- Paper path is fairly straight, which should lead to less feed/jamming problemsCons:- Doesn't come with an AC adapter or carrying case. I purchased the case, but will wait on the AC adapter -- not sure if I'm gong to need it. This thing is pretty fast without it.I just used it for the 1st time today, and went through a stack of 50 double-sided papers in less than 15 minutes. Other than needing to spend more time learning to tweak the software settings to my liking, this thing rocks. All papers fed correctly, despite some having worn corners and creases from being folded. The scan quality is indistinguishable from my Canon flatbed when set to 300 DPI, grayscale, JPG output. I haven't tried color scanning yet, and will update this review when I do.In short, I was concerned that a mobile scanner wouldn't give the quality that I wanted, and wouldn't stand up to real-world use. I can confidently say that this unit will probably prove me wrong on both counts. I consider this scanner to be money well spent, and will now be getting back to my goal of eliminating the piles. Highly recommended.** update 9/18/2012 **This scanner has already paid for itself in terms of the time and frustration that it has saved me. As long as you don't put more than 20 - 25 less-than-perfect similarly-sized papers in the input tray at once, it'll never misfeed. If the papers are perfect, I have loaded up to 50 papers without a misfeed. The software is quite good. You have the choice of installing the drivers + full set of programs onto your PC, or you can run the drivers + a reduced set of programs from the ROM in the scanner. This feature essentially makes the unit computer agnostic, meaning that you can plug it into any computer -- with or without the software installed on it -- and use it. Very cool. The unit is made well, and I have already scanned hundreds of pages with only a handful of misfeeds. This unit is awesome, and highly recommended for anyone that handles large numbers of documents. Having your paperwork digitized clears your desk, allows you to find important papers in minutes, and provides a digital archive of everything that passes through your hands.
НеоВояжер-9TOJJ
04.01.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This is only my third scanner I've owned and first scanner to be good enough to scan printed photos and negative film. I have spent the last week scanning about 1800 photos and negative film. In short, this scanner is very good for archiving old photos. This scanner is so much quicker than my old Canoscan LIDE 20 even on some of the 9000F's highest settings. The preview is also very fast.Printed photos:The lid is pretty strong and can keep down the most rolled up photos. Most of the photos I scanned came out pretty good. I think that since my monitor and scanner is not calibrated, some of the colors seemed just a bit off after the fade correction. I generally use the fade correction on black and white photos while on color, I would manually adjust it. There is also this blue tint problem when using the scanner driver with Google's Picasa. However, using the MP Navigator EX with the scanner driver is about the same as using Picasa and have resorted to this.The thumbnail view feature on the scanner driver works well. It does take some playing around with where the photos are on the scanner to get it to recognize each individual picture sometimes. Once you get used to it, its not an issue. It can scan up to 12 different images (and put them in individual files) at one time. There was some rare instances i needed more than 12, but rarely so 12 should be enough for most scans.Scanning negatives:I have scanned some color and b/w films and it seems to work well. The instructions calls for having the film emulsion side up (what they really say is photo facing up), versus the established practice of keeping it down ("dull" side down facing the scanner). Doing this without any tweaks to the software yields pictures that are flipped (does not matter if you flip horizontal or vertical). You will have to manually flip it when you get back into MP Navigator before saving, or flipping the image in Scangear before you scan. Either way its not difficult or time consuming. It is a pain when you forget before saving since now some of your scanned film is backwards.You should always check the preview to see if the software missed or mis-cropped any of the negative film. Sometimes this can happen if the photo negative is too dark or too light. It has happened on occasion so i always check the preview.The 35mm negative holder works pretty well. With some film, the holder can get caught on the film, preventing it from closing properly. Sometimes it takes some adjustment but not too difficult once you notice what the problem is. It can scan two strips of 6 negatives, or 12 negatives in total. I usually use 2400dpi and it takes the scanner 12 minutes to scan 12 negatives. 3200dpi takes 20 minutes. For many pictures, 2400dpi can yield an 8x10 printed photo at good quality. Check the output resolution and needed resolution for prints to verify.MP Navigator EX:I always use the scanner driver so i can adjust the settings as i go along, depending on the pictures/negatives. Then later on, you can save them to another directory and rename the starting letters, and numbering the photos in order. If you use the same default starting letters (IMG), it will number after the last photo you saved. If there is already an IMG_0012, it will name the next set IMG_0013 and so forth. This is very handy if you dont want to change the name and keep saving them in batches.The software scans and stores the data in BMP files in another directory. This directory can get large quite fast since many of my scans were above 50mb, so after 30 files, it is about 1.5GB. It stores it after each scan. In the unlikely event something goes wrong, the files are still there in the BMP format. Even if you start up the software again to scan, it will number the BMP after the existing ones so the old ones are never over-written. This can happen if the ScanGear app is minimized. When you do this, i have not seen a way to restore this window. I have used Photoshop to automate saving the BMPs as standard quality JPGs.Computer Hardware.My computer has an AMD BE-2350 with only 2GB ram on windows XP. It seems to scan everything fine using the newest version of MP Navigator EX (3.14) with the newest scanner driver. I have kept the BMP image size below 100MB, or about 5-10mb in JPG format with "standard" compression. Some have complained that having not enough ram will not work with this scanner, but with the latest software and drivers, having only 2gb seems to work on my computer.
ХроноГость-2JUZP
23.02.2013
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I was looking for a network scanner that I could place anywhere in my home to scan and organize my documents. I was willing to invest a fair amount of money, more than the average home user. But in the end, I found that more money did not necessarily give me a better scanner. Note that I'm an IT professional, so I have a fair amount of technical background to configure this complex scanner.What initially attracted me to this scanner was the ability to scan without an attached PC. I was hoping to scan and send PDFs as email attachments to myself. I quickly found, however, that the email configuration options were outdated and limited. Virtually all email services like Gmail require encrypted connections. But this scanner does not provide support for the common TLS encryption settings required by Gmail. I had to revert to using my ISP mail server, which had a simpler requirement for encryption that this scanner supported. Although I was able to get the email sending to work, I discovered that it took over a minute to send the email. While the scanner is sending the email, you cannot perform any other functions on the scanner. You must wait for the email to be sent before you can scan another document. I would expect that the scanner could do a background email send.The speed of the scanner was another feature that attracted me, but as I mentioned above, the slow email sending negated any benefits of the faster scanning speed.Since email sending was so slow, I decided I would try to scan to a local network file share instead. In the process of trying to configure a local network file share, the scanner needed to restart. But sometime during this process, I was unable to power on the scanner... ever again. It simply would not power on. No lights. The screen was dark. A hardware reset (pressing the reset button in the back) didn't help.That was the end of my experience with this scanner. I sent it back and asked for a refund. I ended up buying a Canon DR-C125 scanner at a fraction of the cost of this scanner. Although the C125 requires a computer to scan, the speed of the C125 far exceeded the speed of this more expensive scanner because I didn't have to wait as long in between scans.There are no software updates for this scanner (since it was initially released). I can't imagine why anyone would want to purchase a scanner with such poorly designed and outdated software. It runs an embedded version of Windows CE. There are faster and more efficient scanning options out there.
ИнфраГость-7AGAT
22.01.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I purchased the CanoScan 9000f recently and wanted to review the scanner as I begin to work through the process of learning this unit. To set the stage, I am a photographer and I have never gone back and scanned my old film photographs. I have about 30 years of film and the task is a large one. I finally decided that I needed to buy something since I have my wedding photo proofs and they are now 15 Years old and I know that they will not last forever.My objectives in this project gave me a few requirements for a scanner. Here is what I was looking for...1. Since this project is about scanning my wedding photos, I wish to remain married. This means that I cannot buy multiple scanners, spend $1000's on a scanner or fill my office with large quantities of gear.2. I wanted a device that would make high-ish resolution scans of both film and prints. I need to scan my wedding proofs since I have no negatives. I also need to scan a large quantity of 35mm and a few medium format film frames.3. I want a solution that allows me to scan multiple 35mm frames without manual interaction. I have used other scanners in the past and I know that each scan takes a while. Thus I also know that if you can scan multiple frames at once then you can walk away and load the thing up again later. This helps to speed up the arduous process of scanning film.After reading MANY reviews I saw the good and bad of the 9000F and decided to give it a try. The biggest complaint was that the quality is substandard to high end film-only scanners. I decided that since a $1,000+ device is not in my current budget that if under $200 this unit was worth the risk.When I received the unit it installed in less then 10 minutes without any problems. It's sure not a bulletproof design, but it seems to be made reasonably well for a machine at this price point. It has all sorts of nice easy to use features to scan various kinds of doc's with a press of a button and they seem to work as advertised, but for my needs I don't really use these. I quickly dug into the advanced mode in the scan driver since I am looking to use this thing to its limits.What is really nice here is that Canon gives you a suite of tools that allow you to use the driver without calling the driver from a TWAIN compliant program. This is nice for bulk scans since there is no need to have the overhead of having a program like photoshop open just to call the TWAIN scanning program. You have a button dashboard that lets you choose and action and in my case I hit "Scan". This opens another utility that allows you to select your scan options. One of these options is to set your setting in the TWAIN driver itself and this is going to be the choice that you want to use if you are doing more critical work. When you hit scan it opens the TWAIN driver where you can choose the "Advanced" tab to get down to the nitty gritty.This is where I find some cool features and some frustrating limitations. What is really nice is that when you scan film it automatically crops each frame and you don't really need to deal with multiple frames or cropping. So far, the cropping has been spot on for my film. However, there are some serious limitations. The first one is that the Canon utilities limit your scans to 10,000 pixels and about 100Mb is size. The size limit is not the output size limit but the incoming data size. (H x W x Color Depth) Thus your 100Mb files actually end up at about 5-7 Mb JPG files at output. (unless you choose to use TIFF Files)Another big limitation is that the driver does not give you effective control over sizing your images. In todays world we care about images in a digital world. We care about resolution in Pixels not paper size. The resolution is most important since we generally allow our printing software to scale images to fit the output device's resolution and paper size. Where the Canon scan driver is lacking is that it does not give you any control over the input from the device but rather has you setup the output settings in terms of DPI and Paper Size. The best solution that I have found is to set a custom paper size and set it to Pixels in place of inches and then set the size to 6666 x 10,000 which gets you to the 10,000 limit but gives the right aspect for a 35mm frame. The downside to this method is that once you do this the driver is no longer able to pass along the direction of the images and you must rotate them manually after they are scanned. (with the automatic settings, the driver can actually rotate your images which is a nice feature)The second limitation that I see is that after you scan in the driver, the photo's are in some sort of a cache. You need to exit the driver in order to have the utility copy them to your selected location. This slows down the process since the copy locks up the software for about a minute as the copy happens. You then must Press two "scan" buttons again to get back into the advanced scan dialog. Th
Вектрон-5AGRE
21.03.2013
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I bought the old version of this scanner and was quite impressed with the output - both photo and film. The only issue I faced was the time it takes to scan films. Nevertheless, I went on scanning my photos... when I read a review of somebody saying, "Don't buy this... wait for the MKII version". Well, to cut the story short, I returned my scanner and waited for MKII's to come out and bought it($199) as soon as it was for sale.I'm not into reviews and all that complicated stuffs... I use my common sense in evaluating a product. First of all, I noticed a downgrade in the scanning of photos. I compared the MKII's output with the old one and it's just not the same - the old version's output was finer. Second, the old version came with Photoshop and MKII didn't. Third, I bought this new version expecting that Canon would address the issue of the long wait for scanning films. To my dismay, it took the same time - 20 minutes to scan 2 sets of films(12 frames)... and worse, it made my 10 year old films look like 50 or older. See, when a product promises to "Make your old photos look virtually brand new again", I expect results. This MKII just didn't deliver.The only 'upgrade' I noticed is that it gives you the facility to scan using the front panel buttons... and that's it. In fact, I think this 'upgrade' is more like a downgrade from the old version it replaced - Photoshop is missing; pictures are grainy and film-scans look so old.And, the thing is, 3 days after I bought MKII, Amazon lowered their price to $179. I felt offended so I returned it back. So, was it worth the wait for the 'upgrade'? No, I personally don't think so. Had I stuck with the old version, I would have finished scanning my thousands of films and photos by now. The only bright side I see in Canon release MKII is that, it drove the price of the old version of it - the "Canon CanoScan 9000F" without the "MKII" - $139 delivered(before MKII's release costs $175).While others advise you to "wait for the new version", I'd say, "revert back to the old version and save money, time and effort".
Плазмонавт-8BEAI
27.09.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I bought this scanner primarily to digitally archive my 35mm film and slide collection. The scanner I was using, a 9 year old Microtek 4900 flatbed, was barely up to the task, with a maximum optical resolution of 2400 dpi, and it had no built-in color correction to remove the orange mask from color negatives, let alone automated dust/scratch removal. And at 2400 dpi, it was far too slow, taking almost an hour to scan a 6-frame film strip. How does the Canon 9000F compare?1. "Street price", at Amazom.com, was $235 total, almost $500 less than the semi-pro Epson 700 flatbed film scanner. The 9000F can only scan 2 strips of 35mm film in one pass, whereas the Epson can scan 4. The 9000F can scan 4 mounted 35mm slides at a time, the Epson can scan 8. But for most amateur photographers, the $700 price tag of the Epson is pretty steep, and unless you have many thousands of slides or filmstrips to scan, the higher capacity of the Epson may not be worth the extra cost. The scanning rate of the 9000F is at least four times faster than my old Microtek at all resolutions between 300 & 2400 dpi. At higher resolutions, the 9000F slows down appreciably - a single 35mm film frame at 9600 dpi took about 20 minutes, with FARE enabled. During the scan, the drive motor in the 9000F is quite smooth, relatively quiet, and gives me the impression of pretty good quality. Other cheap scanners I have used sound like a concrete mixer.2. Image quality. I have tried the 9000F on 35mm color negative film at 2400dpi, 3200dpi, and 9600dpi. The quality of the three scans are all excellent and appear to be about equal in consistency. I also tried scanning a regular 8x10 color photo enlargement at 600 dpi; the 9000F was very fast and the scan quality was incredible, resolving tiny details of the photo, plus dust specks and cat hairs that were invisible to the unaided eye. I have no reservations about the image quality of the 9000F, and can't imagine any other scanner at this price point could better it. A word here about the maximum scan resolution of the 9000F and what it means in the "real world". For reflective media like photo prints, the scanner can crank out 4800 dpi, and for transparencies (film or slides), 9600 dpi. But do you really need that much resolution? My one test frame of a 35mm color negative scanned at 9600 dpi had an interesting and unexpected result: The scanner's resolution exceeds the film's resolution by a substantial amount. Turns out that scanning that film strip at anything above about 3600 dpi did not yield any extra detail, just a huge increase in file size. It's possible that the extremely fine grain size of Kodachrome 25 or Panatomic "X" film might allow the 9000F to pull out extra detail at 9600dpi, but none of my film or slides are extreme-fine grain types, so I can't test that hypothesis myself. As for speed, scanning film at 9600dpi on the 9000F is very slow, about 20 minutes per frame with FARE enabled, so you probably won't want to go above 3600 or 4800 unless you really need to. A 3200 dpi scan of the 35mm film frame took a bit less than five minutes with FARE enabled. This resolution produced the maximum detail from my film; a slightly smoother result than a 2400 dpi scan, but you have to look very close at 200% zoom in Photoshop to see the difference. With the 9000F set to 3200 dpi, a film scan results in a 14 megapixel RGB image, but don't let this number mislead you into thinking that you can see tiny details out of 35 mm film scans. A typical digital SLR, with a 12~15 megapixel CMOS sensor (for example a Canon 50D), produces much sharper images than my film scans with the 9000F scanner, and that's not even with a high-priced "L" series lens on the camera. I DON'T mean to imply in that last statement that the 9000F is a poor performer, just that you shouldn't expect miracles out of scanning color negative film. I'd love to see how the 9000F performs scanning test charts shot on Panatomic "X" or Kodachrome 25. As for scanning color photo prints, you will probably not need to go above 600dpi most of the time. Although the 9000F is capable of scanning reflective media at 4800 DPI, most color photo print paper doesn't have anywhere near this fine of a grain size. However, for forensic scanning of "real objects", for example coins, flower petals, leaves, or documents, the 4800 dpi resolution could be useful, giving you the ability to see surface details that would be invisible other than under a microscope.3. Speed of film scanning. The 9000F is way faster than my old Microtek, but probably not as fast as a $2500 Nikon film scanner. On the other hand, the 9000F can scan anything that will fit on the platen, at 1/10th the price of a dedicated film scanner. Loading of film and slides takes longer on a flatbed like this, and you can only scan 4 slides at a time, compared to unattended batch scanning of a hundred or more slides with some dedicated film scanners.Following are my actual scan speeds for film sca
Вектрон-7QRYJ
27.02.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I've been using the Fujitsu ScanSnap S1500 Instant PDF Sheet-Fed Scanner for PC in my office for years, and while I think it is an exceptional work scanner, I was glad to be given the opportunity to compare it with the Canon imageFORMULA DR-C125. Other than the ScanSnap, I haven't come across any other scanners that excel at office-friendly, mostly pdf, letter-sized document scanning.PROS- Very small footprint. This scanner will easily fit on your desk and takes up a small amount of room.- Optional U-Turn paper path. The scanner can be set to feed paper in a "U" design so it feeds back up instead of straight ahead. This is definitely an advantage over the ScanSnap, which allows you to fold up the front feeder, but then which requires that you leave 11" of room in front of the scanner for the paper to eject. This is one of the best features for me.- One touch scanning. A lot of scanners have 5 or 6 buttons on them to use for different functions, but this scanner, like the Fujitsu has a one touch that will output directly to PDF. I don't have to spend a lot of time setting up options or opening up third party software, and it functions great using the buttons directly from the scanner.- Very fast. Only slightly slower (less than a second per page) than the ScanSnap. This scanner processes documents faster than any flatbed I've used and faster even than my huge Kyocera TasAlfa commercial copier/scanner. If you have a ten page document, you can simply put it in the feeder, press the button, and it will scan and convert to PDF in around 10 seconds.- Duplex scanning. Works great. No need to feed the paper in both directions, and the scanner doesn't have to feed the paper one way, then pull it out and feed it the other way. It makes one pass and detects if it is a two-sided paper. Sometimes it works a little too well, as it will scan a single sheet of paper as duplex if there is really heavy ink on one side that it can see through the opposite side. But this isn't a big issue.- TWAIN driver. The ScanSnap doesn't come with a TWAIN driver, and you must have the CD or software to install. You can't download it from Fujitsu's web site and must e-mail them for an FTP link if you lose the disc. The Canon does have a TWAIN driver which is great for more advanced users.CONS- Poor OCR. I had more errors with the Optical Character Recognition software than I do with the ABBYY OCR software that comes with the ScanSnap.- After 6 months of fairly heavy use, the rollers on the automatic feeder seem to be getting a little more worn, and I have noticed I occasionally will get jams due to the feeder pulling multiple sheets through at once. This usually happens with documents that are a little older and the paper might not be as crisp. But I have definitely noticed it more now than when I first got the scanner.Overall I think the DR-C125 is an excellent scanner. If I had to make a choice between the Fujitsu ScanSnap and this model, I would probably go with the DR-C125 due to my cluttered desk and the U-Turn paper feeding, but really it would be a very difficult choice to make and I don't think you can go wrong with either of them.
ИнфраГость-0CXLB
14.03.2013
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I'm in the process of shopping around for a new scanner. Our Cannon has been in service (sort of) for a little over 18 months and in spite of having been replaced entirely by Cannon, it's still a Lemon.I'd like to take a brief moment and say that Cannon has actually provided some of the best technical and customer support of any company I've encountered. Unfortunately, all the polish in the world can't turn a turd into something you'd like to be seen holding onto.For starters, the 300 Series is built on WinCE (release date: 1996), which is a lot like saying a device is built on Windows 98. With the advent of Win8 RT, Microsoft's new Tablet-based OS, you would be right to think that updates to CS aren't exactly a priority to the Mothership. As a result, this device has out dated network drivers that don't sync up well with Win7+ network. That would be ok if the scan to email function worked but, sadly, it doesn't support secure SMTP (only POP authentication, which is a problem if you use either Google Apps or Exchange). The only options that really work without trouble are the FTP and USB ones... hooray? Don't even bother with the fax option. If you can find a compatible fax server that wasn't attached to a printer nice enough that you would rather scan there than on the Cannon, you're a better hunter than I.Finally, let's talk about the paper feeder. I'm not sure what specific type of paper doesn't cause double and triple feeds. If it exists, I haven't found it. We have tried just about every weight and texture to no avail.The Cannon 220 series had some of these issues but has been a much more reliable machine (I still wouldn't buy it again either). The 300 is a complete and utter lemon.Stay far, far, far away.
КиберНаблюдатель-6WZIY
24.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I spent a while researching Neat Receipts and other small desktop scanners before choosing this one. Portability wasn't a priority, but all its other features were. I chose the Canon P150 over Neat Receipts because I don't need the scanner to do anything except scan really well and look decent.I've been really happy with it since buying it. I'm impressed that it can scan BOTH SIDES of a document at once, assemble them in order before finishing the job and even skip blank pages. Until now, that's something I thought only a much bigger machine could feature - I didn't know it could do that until I'd purchased it and spent a little time with it.HERE'S THE KICKER:MY CANON P150 JUST SURVIVED A 5' FALL OFF OF A SHELF!Don't try this at home, and I can't guarantee the results would be the same. I had it on a shelf next to some books with a bookend in place. The bookend failed and slid into the scanner, which toppled onto the hardwood floor, and several large books came tumbling after it. I looked at the floor and the Canon was in four pieces - the cover had come off the main body, the little wing flaps that open to hold the paper vertically had snapped off, as had the front face. But within a few minutes I was able to figure out that nothing was cracked or broken, the pieces snapped gently back together with a little careful surgery.Nervously, I plugged it into my laptop and set it to scan. Immediately it woke up the software and set to work as if nothing had happened. I'm pretty amazed.
Астрономад-6TEZB
07.02.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
First, want to thank so many who took the time to write very thorough reviews and added considerable detail. You all helped me make the decision to buy it.Second, i made the decision to buy it last Saturday night and it arrived Tuesday using standard shipping. That was quick.Third, setup was easy and on Wednesday I was busy scanning. Lot of old photos first (think 1960s and 1970s and a few even older). Bingo I had my first album.Fourth, despite some criticism from some reviewers I had no problem using the plastic inserts to hold 35 mm slides, butFifth, when i did the slides and it said "remove document protector" I got confused (not out of the norm for me). I kept looking at the slides thinking there is no protection on these things. I checked the manual which I had downloaded, but could not figure it out. Sooo ...Sixth, I called Canon customer service and well they were great. he technician patiently, quickly and oh so politely stepped through the process with me and I learned that the "document protector" is the insert in the lid that clips out. Ah, ever felt really dumb? The technician convinced me I wasn't and I quickly scanned the two slides. The quality of those two images is just incredible considering that they were taken in 1974 and have moved with me to several places and two other countries.Finally, I noted one or two reviews that lamented the plastic inserts that are used for 35 mm slides and negatives. I beg to disagree, they are solid. But, in a way I appreciate the negative comments because I knew that I might need to be careful with them.So, yes, I'm thrilled with this product and the price is great.
Дроид-0NAFE
02.04.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Having gotten this scanner in 1999, I still use it when I have the occasion to scan slides negatives. I have also used it to scan APS negatives and if careful, you can use it to scan negatives and slides from old 126 "Instamatic" film with good results.Since I got the scanner, I've used it on W98SE, W2k and XP machines, but have not attempted to try it on a Vista/W7 or W8 machine - but in theory, this should work if one gets a new, more modern SCSI card that is supported by a newer OS. Making the originally-supplied SCSI card work with W2k/XP is a pain, but the instructions on how to do this may be found in prior reviews here and elsewhere on the web.From the beginning, I have NOT used the Canon scanning software and the programs supplied with it since it was pretty terrible, but instead have always used "VueScan" by Hamrick software. This software - which can have a bit of a learning curve - talks directly to the scanner's hardware and allows a lot of features and options not originally provided by the Canon software including the ability to do "deep" scans of slides/negatives using multiple exposures as well as a wide variety of color/tone adjustments: The VueScan software is still supported and will still work with this now-old hardware.
Фотон-1UEKA
23.06.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I researched scanners quite a bit before settling on this scanner. I have used it for several months now, and I love it. Here's the quick and dirty:Pros:1) Quick. Does double-sided scanning by scanning the top and the bottom simultaneously, so there's no duplex mechanism to break down, and it takes the same time as doing one-sided.2) Easy to use. The software comes on a separate disk or right on the scanner. So, you can just plug the scanner into any computer and run the software right off the scanner (rather than downloading and installing the software on any computer you want to use it on).3) Smart software. The software has several nice features that make this scanner pretty self-sufficient.First, you can tell it to do one-sided, two-sided, or do two-sided only as necessary. It automatically detects when there is writing on both sides and scans only in that case. If it's lined paper, it doesn't work (since the lines are captured as text), but for plain paper, it's awesome.Second, it can automatically detect if it's skewed and realign the paper. Again, not perfect, but pretty good. I rarely (or really, never) have to feed the paper through again to fix skewness.Third, it can automatically detect the orientation of the page. Again, not perfect, but it usually does a very nice job.4) Very quiet. I hate loud, noisy machines, but I loved running this scanner. It purrs.5) Small and sleek. It folds into a sleek little rectangle when not in use.Cons1) This cannot scan pages in books. It has to be a free-floating piece of paper.2) It can only handle about 20 pages at a time. However, it has a function called "continuous scanning" that lets you scan batch after batch of 20 pages, with all of them ending up in the same pdf document. Not bad, especially for a portable scanner.3) It doesn't do as well with receipts. It can be done (I used it with printer paper, notebook paper, magazine pages torn out, pictures, receipts, etc.), but the weirder (thinner, thicker, slicker) the paper, the more care you must pay to feeding it in. I was definitely successful in getting almost all receipts through the feeder, though.Overall, this scanner requires minimal work from the user to get a scan that is quite good.
Плазмонавт-7LGUJ
03.12.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
*****GREAT SCANNER:-Scans both sides of document automatically-Detects blank pages and only scans pages with content-No matter what direction you feed the document into the scanner it scans right side up automatically-Auto Document Feeder works better than advertised, I've loaded 25+ page documents into the auto feeder tray and it scans them all perfectly-The built in software works great (I use it on a Mac) I like it better than Mac "Image Capture" which used to be my favorite-Light and durable, I throw it in my backpack without any special cover or protection and it's fine-FAST, this little guy scans faster than my two top of the line desktop scanner/printers-Low error rate, my desktop scanners are constantly grabbing two pages at once or returning some kind of error message, this little guy rarely messes up or grabs two pages at once-No power cord to plug into the wall-No batteries-It works off your computers power, and from my experience it doesn't seem to drain my laptop's power noticeably (I use it with my MacBook Pro)-Set up/Break down takes about 10 seconds-Easily scans any size item - I can scan a legal sized document then scan an envelope or a business card without any reconfiguration of the scanner-Easily scans different thicknesses - I can scan a super thin item like a paper receipt and then scan a thick item like a post card or card stock photo without any reconfiguration of the scanner-Doesn't bend or damage the original item being scanned - my expensive desktop scanner bends everything that it scans, so when I'm scanning a thick card stock 8X10 glossy photo it comes out the other end of the desktop scanner somewhat warped. The Canon P-150 doesn't bend the documents that it scans so they don't get warped or rounded or bent while being scanned-Never gets jammed, my desktop scanner gets jammed once every 100-ish scans, the P-150 has never ever jammed on me and I use it constantly.The P-150 has given me a truly portable office. I use Faxage (an email to fax service) so now with the P-150 I can fax anything from anywhere. I just scan the document, attach it to an email and boom. Its really great.I bought this scanner for portable use only, since I have a very good desktop scanner/printer but I love the Canon P-150 so much I use it as my main desktop scanner while at the office and I pack it up and take it with me when I leave.I just can't say enough good things about this scanner. I am almost always disappointed with how well electronics work once I get them home and put them into action, but not the P-150, it's just great. I highly recommend it."Hey Canon, if your listening... It would be so amazing if the P-150 was also a portable printer! Maybe that would be impossible, but it would be so amazing - I'd gladly pay double the price of the P-150 if it had printing capabilities!"Thanks for a really great product Canon,-Kent
Спектр-1MTPN
16.03.2013
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Currently I have 4 working scanners in my possession, including this Canon scanner, my latest purchase. As I am doing a large project with old family photos, I want a high quality scanner. The one I have been using, an Epson, does a fine job, except for a fine streak in the middle of the scanned image, which led me to purchase the Canon.Of all 4 scanners, including two that are part of all-in-one printer units, the Canon produces the worst quality scan. A total surprise, since the reviews for Canon Mark (and Mark II) scanners so far have been tremendous. In short, I could not get a clean scan--all the images came out with a perceptible double--needless to say, one can't get a sharp scan. (I shall upload photos momentarily.)Now, for casual office work, this will certainly suffice. It scans fast and takes no time to warm up. However, the quality of the scan is unacceptable for those who want to scan old photos as a way of preserving them. I will request an exchange, on the off chance that this is a defective unit. If the next one is better, I will update my review. Meanwhile, if you purchase a scanner, make sure you test it out ASAP, or else you'd be stuck with it after the return deadline.
Туманник-6HNIN
12.09.2012
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
This scanner is a great product when it works.However, it will randomly get into a mode where it will throw a double feed detection regardless of whether there is one or not. After talking with Canon support twice about this I was told that if you leave your PC on then over time less and less power is given to the USB ports and eventually this will occur. I actually have no idea if this is true but after being in the document scanning business for over 10 years I can tell you that I have never seen this with any other scanner including other Canon scanners. I personally think there is either a hardware or driver defect that Canon either hasn't figured out yet or doesn't want to admit to because there is no fix. So if you don't mind rebooting your computer when this happens then I would say go for this scanner because it works great other than that for the low budget scanner it is. But if you rarely reboot as many PC users do today then I would probably go for a higher end scanner in the $500 price range. This will get you a better production quality desktop scanner and problems like this will not exist.I would recommend the Fujitsu Scan Snap which is similar to this scanner from Cannon but it has no Twain drive. So if you only need to scan using the included software then no problem but if you think you might want to scan into another third party application at some point then chances are it will not work because that application will probably require the Twain driver. Bottom line for me is that there is no portable scanner currently on the market that measures up. Maybe the dream of a compact portable scanner will be realized some day but it hasn't happened yet.Thanks for reading and happy scanning!
МехаРейнджер-5SOBV
17.08.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I nervously upgraded from the DR-2080C (USB/SCSI Interface) to the DR C125. Nervously, because I expected it to be made in China and to have the same problems as the DR-2080C. Its made in Japan (means assembled in Japan from Japanese and foreign parts) AND solved all the annoying problems of the DR-2080C (e.g. constant multiple sheet feed errors).I use this in home and home office applications to back up documentation to Adobe PDF format. Though, happily, many organizations now post bills etc in PDF online, this is still my workhorse for unavailable PDF. My usage is light-medium compared to a muti-person office. 90% B&W 400 dpi, some color.I use the supplied software. If I need any real manipulation of the PDF output after the scan, I use Adobe Acrobat Pro. If you are in the paperless office mentality, Acrobat or an equivalent are a basic necessity.Some of the plastic parts and overall feel seem cheap and might break in the future. But that is what I thought of the DR-2080C and it has had no failures in 8 years. The "consumable" rollers on the older unit lasted the life of the machine. We will have to see how these rollers do.Agree with the positive reviews. I can now "set it and forget it" on large scans.For me there are currently no "cons".TIPS: A) You can now save your settings!! There are two places 1) User preferences Backup/Restore [under Advanced setting box]. Creates a ".dat" file 2) Tray>Icon>Environmental Settings>Basic Settings>Backup/Restore. Creates a ".cot" file. Not sure of the difference but I assume .cot saves everything.B) To scan long documents you go to Windows Start>Canon DR-C125>Canon ImageFormula Utility>Properties>Maintenance. Long documents trigger a paper jam message if not set.C) Also under the B location is the number of scans on the roller set.
ТехноНаблюдатель-3PCZA
02.04.2013
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
The scanner appears to be OK, with a somewhat easy setup. I have owned a Canon 9550F for 5 years and thought it was a awesome scanner. I was thoroughly disappointed in the software that came with this scanner, it looks like a 9 year old child created it. I use my scanner for business and wanted a scanner that would print and copy easily....this scanner software will not even recognize my new printer, my old scanner Canon 9950F had no problems with this, and the software would allow you to select your printer. This software does not allow me to copy the image, paste the image or print the image. I have to close the scanner and open in photoshop in order to do simple functions, a big disappointment---and I expected more from Canon. I am running windows 8 64 bit, and did download the correct drivers and still no solution...this scanner maybe great for photos, but if you are looking for quick and efficient duplication of documents, don't waste your money.
Квантум-7CFNI
01.11.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This is a solidly-made, high-quality scanner. Despite it's relatively small size, it weighs 2 pounds 5.4 ounces with cables. This makes the Canon imageFORMULA P0150 not-so-light to pack with you during travels. However, this scanner redeems itself with its excellent performance, great software bundle and its file output options.For fastest performance you'll need to connect two USB cables between this scanner and your computer or buy an AC adapter (not included). Using both cables this scanner will scan both sides of a color document at 300 dpi in about three or four seconds. If you're scanning multiple pages (the document feeder will hold about 20 pages) the Canon software is smart enough to skip the blank ones.When using Canon's included scan software you can save the results in a jpeg, tiff, BMP or PDF file. PaperPort 11 is part of the software bundle giving you OCR capabilities and the ability to export documents into Word, WordPerfect and other popular editing programs. This scanner's TWAIN driver enables you to scan directly into applications such as Acrobat, Photoshop, Photo-Paint and Picasa.This scanner actually scans both sides of the document at the same time instead of flipping and re-scanning pages as some other duplex scanners do. Not only is this much faster, it greatly reduces the chances of a paper jam. In my opinion, the real test of a scanner is its output quality and that's where the Canon imageFORMULA P-150 really shines. I've scanned just about every document imaginable including screened color, black and white documents and color photos. The output quality of this scanner is as good or better than any I've used or owned.When documents are dusty, they can pull dust into the document feeder and affect the scanner's output quality, but it's simple enough to open the scanner and use a soft cloth to clean the scanning windows to eliminate streaks. A clean scanner, no matter whose design, will always yield better results. I have owned this scanner for about a year and give it regular workouts. It is clearly built to last. The scanner's page separator, for example, is rated for 10,000 pages before Canon recommends its replacement. Other moving parts are replaceable by the end user if this scanner becomes worn from heavy use.This scanner does have limitations compared with other scanners in this price range. It has no flat platen for scanning books or other rigid documents and it cannot scan photographic film or color transparencies. However its ability to automatically feed and scan loose document pages into high-quality digital output is impressive, especially when you consider its small size, portability and how little desktop space it consumes. Highly recommended.
НеоВояжер-7NUTL
05.12.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I always dread the software that comes with consumer appliances, but the software with this unit isn't bad. You can configure the one touch button to direct scans wherever you want them (a folder, email, an application, etc), and it integrates really well with Evernote which was a critical requirement for me.The unit itself takes little space when folded up, but is very efficient when deployed.Some potential areas for improvement: It would be nice if the rollers somehow kept documents straight when feeding them without bothering to set the paper guides. When I need to scan the odd receipt it doesn't always feed straight unless I reset the guides which is a minor inconvenience. That said, the software does a very good job of straightening things out automatically 95% of the time. Another minor nitpick is that it doesn't handle really long documents - I end up having to cut the pages in half before scanning them (by really long I mean longer than legal-length paper - like some of those fold-out contracts or agreements I sometimes get from credit card companies and the like). Ideally the thing should just accept an arbitrarily long document as long as it fits width-wise. But, this doesn't really happen often and the fact that I can document-feed double-sided in such a cheap scanner makes this impossible to pass up.
Кварковец-7HBNL
26.07.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
OVERVIEW: I have been using the product for only two weeks, but have scanned over a thousand pages. I bought this unit primarily to scan large documents (i.e. notes from grad school classes, manuals, etc.), and so the duplex mode and ability to put a stack of papers in at a time were critical. It handles both of those well.CONCERNS: some of the images show notable skew/slant, even when fed straight. At first I was not so careful about the pages being fed straight, and it was notably sloppy (whether scanning a few pages at once or 20). When I became more careful, it helped, though I notice that papers which were stapled together at one point, then the staple removed, and then fed through the scanner are at higher risk for skew (even when "fanning" the pages prior). The other knock on this scanner is that I am not remotely satisfied with the quality of 600 dpi color scanning (the highest resolution available) for photos, and it had trouble feeding a photo and left a mark on it. If you are interested in regularly scanning photos, I do NOT recommend this product. (I am open to advice if folks have faced these same challenges and found ways around them.)That said, it is:-fast-easy to scan and save-small/compact-reasonably priced-capable of handling long documents (i.e. 300 pages) quite easily-works well on Mac with software (though there is allegedly a P-150M that has built-in Mac drivers)Advice if you buy it:-take care to feed your papers well and use the guides-the 300 dpi black and white resolution works very well for creating compact files of typeface docs (and is easier to read and uses much less memory than gray-scale)-Apple's "Preview" software is a free way to edit pdf's (i.e. deleting/re-ordering pages)! No need for Adobe's full version.
Гиперион-6AHUC
12.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
previously I had used a panasonic (i think) sheet feed scanner, but the software hung so often i moved it into the dust bin, and switched to using a flat bed scanner. this blows them all away.Installation: installation is a snap. The only thing is that if, like me, you don't like reading manuals, make sure you open up the front cover and remove the packing tape and orange tab on the inside.Software: Installed on a Mac. Was very easy to setup. Pop in the disk, click, and off you go. It adds a simple quick toolbar item if you prefer over the button on the scanner.Scanning: Blazingly fast. This is so dramatically faster than either the previous sheet feed scanner or the flat bed that they don't even deserve to be in the same category. We put in four pages and it flew through them. It flew through them so quickly i thought it was just a preview scan...Duplex scanning: works perfectly. If it over guesses and scans the backside of thin paper, you can easily delete those scans prior to savingColor detection: spot onImage clarity: beautifulIn short, within a few minutes we had gorgeous scans operating. We can now go through reams of contracts, bills, and everything else and archive them.My only complaint is that we didn't buy one sooner...
Показаны отзывы 529-552 из 1154.
