Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Nikon D5100

Почитал отзывы про свою камеру, поржал искренне, советы...

Nikon D5100 если сравнивать с Nikon D3200, то отличия следующие :
1 у 5100 чуть больше настроик,мощней процессор, но есть и минус на мой взгляд матрица 16.9 мегапикселей даёт менее чёткое изображение (у Nikon D3200 матрица 24.7 мегапикселов и процессор послабже)
2 у 5100 больше настроек ISO, 100,125,160,200,250,320,400,500,640,800,1000,1250,1600,2000,2500,3200,4000,5000,6400,Hi0.3,Hi0.7,Hi1,Hi2. (у Nikon D3200 100,200,400,800,1600,3200,6400,Hi1)...

До него был D60,очень он мне нравился,но...

Для любительской съемки имеет все функции. Фото этой камерой:
http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/duet-fiord/view/704298/?page=0

Аппарат просто отличный!!!
Профессионально фотографирую. Снимал на D80, D90, D200, D300.
Не могу понять воплей на форумах по поводу урезанной управляемости. Из всех любительских зеркалок (не только от Nikon) эта произвела наилучшее впечатление! Все очень понятно, просто и в то же время эргономично (руки у меня не маленькие). Новая матрица творит чудеса. На моих остальных кропах (D200 и D300) "удается" получить шумы даже на ISO800. Здесь...

Я как и многие тут выбирала из 5100 и 7000.
Выбрала 5100 из-за денег и, что самое главное, из-за поворотного экрана.
Я далеко не профессионал, до 5100 у меня был (и до сих пор есть) D40. Старичку уже 4 года и я поняла, что надо увеличивать мегапиксели и расширять кругозоры.
Разница ощущается моментально,...

Доволен покупкой на все 100 процентов,рекомендовал бы покупать с объективом nikkor 18-55 VR, так как он все-таки лучше и резче 18-105(получая универсальность фокусного жертвуете качеством).Для любителей телефото есть nikkor 55-200 VR очень даже суперский и недорогой.Режим видео коментировать...

Если вы будите использовать камеру исключительно с китовыми объективами,...

При катастрофической нехватки кнопок управления - две кнопки «инфо»! Особенно умиляет отдельная кнопка «Удаление снимков», как будто купил...

So, I first had the sony a55 for two years, and wasn't thrilled with it in the least bit. I don't know how many people reviewing these sony cameras print their pictures, but I do and the pictures always had a lot of noise in dark areas, weren't sharp, the colors were never vibrant, and I normally had to edit the crap outta them to make them look like they weren't taken with my iphone. They looked slightly better on a screen, but once printed- I would have about one good picture out of 100. And that was the a55. I thought I had just got a lemon or something, since it has so many raving reviews.So! I had a bestbuy warranty and broke the a55 after two and a half years, and because I had a sony zoom lens I could do nothing with, i decided to be upgraded to the a65. Even with a poor experience with the a55, I was so thrilled to get the a65, thinking It would be a better dslt, and I have to say it was worst as far as picture quality goes. Edges not sharp whatsoever [which is the main thing I look for in a photo], colors are faded, when I print the pictures it looks like an iPhone took them. I know how to use a camera, I tried different times of day and different settings. Also, I'm printing the pictures at an actual photo lab. I could get better pictures with a canon sx260.I was very very unhappy with the picture quality, and I showed about 6 other people the pictures and literally all of they agreed. Same terrible noise and grain in dark areas like the a55,, blurry, faded colors. The dark areas don't even have to be that dark to get noise. The pictures look beautiful on the bright LCD screen, but it's a big difference than what your actually getting.However! Some things I did like about it was how easy it is to use, it explains everything as you go through the settings [great for beginners]; how friggin fast it is (which is the first thing I noticed when I took my first picture), and the body IMO feels very sturdy. Also, the viewfinder to lcd screen with just your eye is a nice feature. Or was that the a55? i dont remember. Besides those things, i was extremely dissapointed, and I returned it and stood at bestbuy for half an hour debating between the nikon d5100, d5200, and d7000. I want the d7000, but it was out of my price range, so I got the d5100 to just try out a nikon; and mannn, what a difference. Huge huge huge difference. It's cheaper then the a65, and so much better as far as picture quality goes. I was flipping through some pictures last night, and they are so so vibrant and crisp without editing them. On my computer, I was flipping backwards through my pictures and all the sudden the pictures got ugly and I was like, "what happened with that one in all these beautiful ones?" And I realized it got into pictures from the a65.Im really feeling the nikon, but I will be returning it as well, this time I'm gonna get the d7000 and take the price hit, because the body of the nikon feels very cheap. I've had it a week and the battery cover won't open. Also, you have to turn a nob on the top of the camera to switch from viewfinder to LCD every time the camera turns on, and I don't use the viewfinder and that's inconvenient for me and made me miss a picture yesterday. The camera is 4fps i believe, and it is a tid bit slow if your thinking about using it for sports. Maybe you can buy a lens. Idk.And one last thing negative about the nikon is I personally don't like the Double shutter noise it makes every picture you take. Besides those, though, the picture quality is so far impressive. ive only printed a few, but they werent too shabby either. I buy a camera for the pictures, really, and if you do too, you will notice a difference in a sony vs. a nikon. I didn't think it would be a big difference when I originally bought the a55, but I regret that choice three years ago. I've wasted hundreds of pictures IMO not using a nikon.These are all my personal experiences and opinions. I don't do anything professional with photography, I just like taking pretty pictures :) and am kind of particular I guess. I'm planning on posting this on the other cameras reviews, too, in hope of helping someone else. I have done hours, days, MONTHS of reviewing a whole lot of cameras; and ended up more confused then helped. Even now, I'm typing into google "d5200 vs d7000" :) good luck camera buyers- your probably torn between two cameras right now, and I hope this review helped.

There are a lot of great reviews of this product out there. A lot of highly technical reviews and some very basic. For me the decision to purchase this camera came down to a couple of things I thought I would highlight here. I am not a professional in any sense of the word. I love to take photos and wanted a camera that would allow me to take great pictures and also allow me to think outside the "auto" box and shoot in manual, changing my settings, etc.Basically, I have been torn between Nikon and Canon for some time. This camera, in general, got better reviews than its Canon competitor (the T3i Rebel). Ultimately, books, countless websites and forums have debated this topic so I won't get into that. I could bore you with technical details, but sometimes simpler is better. If you are not a pro and just want to take some fun quality pictures, this Review is for you. Not only was this camera rated highly in every single review I read, but after researching for MONTHS, I ultimately bought this Nikon. After owning it about 8 months now, here is what I know:1) It feels / Looks goodThe camera feels as though it is built solidly and I love the way it feels in my hand. It doesn't feel cheaply made and has a good weight to it.2) I love the scene modes / effects modesThis camera has several several scene modes like the simpler point and shoot cameras including pet, night, beach, party/indoor, sunset, dusk/dawn, candlelight, autumn, food, night portrait, and blossom. Whew that's a lot of modes! Now there's nothing more intimidating than handing this camera to a friend and asking them to take a picture of you and someone else. They are going to look at you as though you've just asked them to climb the empire state building...with one hand! But these scene modes allow you to quickly identify your scene and then shoot--or helps someone not camera inclined take a better shot. In fact, I use these modes a lot and they allow my husband (who previously ran when he heard the word camera) to take amazing photos as well. As if that were not enough, this camera also includes some effects modes including fisheye, color outline, selective color, Miniature, color sketch, and some picture control modes that let you edit photos right from the camera (risky but useful).3) The pictures are fabulous!Okay I promised not to get technical on you, but overall, the pictures the camera takes are very good. I upgraded to this from an older Canon Xti and I can tell you that the sharpness for your common photo sizes like 8 x 10, 4 x 6, and 5 x 7 will be sharp and clear... As long as you focused correctly. I found the shutter to respond quickly when taking sports shots, and the frame rate is about 4 fps which is pretty good.I should mention that the camera does not have an in body focus motor which means you will need to use lenses which supply a focus motor if you like auto focus. This will not be an issue if you are using the 18-55 mm lense that you can purchase with or comes as a part of your camera package. This may affect you if you are using old lenses. But keep in mind the old lenses will work, but you will have to focus the shot yourself.Also, the noise of your photos will increase the higher your ISO. But overall, there is a good compromise at higher ISOs between sharpness and noise---which basically means you can still take a good photo in low light wih this camera!Keep in mind that you can shoot in RAW mode (for those of us who really like to tweak our photos and get technical) but is perfectly fine shooting in JPG mode which you can edit as you wish or easily upload as is to the web.4) Movies are so-soMovies are only okay. For me not a huge deal as I bought this to take photos... But movies are easy to make although I have heard that people have complained about sound clarity issues. The output is in .mov format which is nice. But honestly, I have come to enjoy making small movies and have not had sound issues.If I had any complaint about this camera is that the menus are difficult and non intuitive to navigate. One you familiarize yourself with it, however, it becomes a non issue... But for me it was a steep learning curve coming from Canon's easy to navigate menus.Overall, this is a great camera. Where it really shines is in its overall performance and picture quality. I especially love those scenes which are not included on similar other cameras including the Canon which is ultimately why I decided on this camera. I also realized that the key to good photos lies not really in the camera so much as the person behind the camera and the lenses used to capture the shot. Get yourself a lens or two (or buy it with the 18-55mm lens which is a great overall entry lens) and get this camera. Then go out there and have some fun! This camera allows you the versatility to do a little bit of everything and the quality to capture those special moments in your life.