Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX210 IS
 |
Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX210 IS, черный/серебристый | Яндекс Маркет | 35 300 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX210 IS, черный/серебристый | Яндекс Маркет | 36 900 ₽ | Посмотреть |
Плюсы по отзывам пользователей - Почему стоит купить Canon PowerShot SX210 IS?*
*Плюсы и минусы, которые пользователи называют чаще всего на основе практического опыта использования.
- Мощный 14-кратный оптический зум с эффективной стабилизацией:
- Позволяет снимать удалённые объекты (яхты, птиц, детали зданий) с чёткостью, без смазывания даже с руки.
- Стабилизатор работает на максимальном приближении, идеально для пейзажей и путешествий.
- Зум доступен во время HD-видео, что заменяет отдельную камеру для многих пользователей.
- Полноценные ручные режимы (P, Av, Tv, M):
- Настройки выдержки, диафрагмы, ISO, баланса белого дают качество как у зеркалки в дневном свете.
- Предпросмотр эффекта на экране помогает точно настроить кадр.
- Ручная фокусировка полезна для макро и сложных сцен.
- Качество фото в хорошем освещении:
- Естественные яркие цвета, чёткость до 9-14 МП без артефактов.
- Хорошая цветопередача и детализация для печати 10x15 см и экрана.
- Макро на расстоянии 1-5 см с отличной резкостью.
- HD-видео 720p с оптическим зумом:
- Качество сравнимо с бюджетными видеокамерами, тихий зум без шумов мотора.
- Стереозвук приемлемый в помещении, стабилизация снижает тряску.
- Длительная запись (до часа на 16 ГБ карте класса 6+).
- Компактность и эргономика:
- Вмещается в карман брюк, лёгкий (менее 350 г), удобный ремешок.
- Большой 3" экран яркий, меню интуитивное на русском.
- Сборка в Японии, прочный корпус без люфтов.
- Ёмкий аккумулятор:
- До 200-400 снимков или 1-2 дня съёмки на одном заряде.
- Компактная зарядка, совместим с неоригинальными АКБ.
- Спецэффекты и удобства:
- Рыбий глаз, миниатюра, панорама без штатива.
- Распознавание лиц, улыбка/мигание для групповых фото.
- Программное обеспечение в комплекте для обработки на ПК.
Минусы по отзывам пользователей - О чем стоит задуматься перед покупкой:
- Неудобное расположение вспышки:
- Выскакивает под левый указательный палец при включении, мешает хвату.
- Тень от объектива в нижнем углу при макро или близкой съёмке со вспышкой.
- Требует привыкания или ручного открытия/закрытия.
- Медленная фокусировка и затвор:
- Задержка 2-4 секунды между кадрами, пропускает движение (дети, животные).
- Автофокус "охотится" в низком свете или на сложных объектах.
- Серийная съёмка медленная (0.7-2 fps), требует class 6+ карты.
- Шумы и слабая съёмка в низком свете:
- Видимый шум от ISO 200+, смазанность без вспышки ночью.
- Авторежим переоценивает ISO, даёт зерно даже днём в тени.
- Требует ручных настроек или штатива для ночных фото.
- Слабый авторежим:
- Часто даёт пересвет/недосвет, активирует вспышку не вовремя.
- Не фокусируется на движении или макро без ручной помощи.
- Искажения по краям на широком угле.
- Отсутствие видоискателя и блики экрана:
- На солнце экран не виден, приходится теньを作る.
- Широкоформатный экран (16:9) с чёрными полосами для фото 4:3.
- Скользкий корпус, маленький рычаг зума неудобен в холод.
- Другие ограничения:
- Нет RAW (только с CHDK), видео в MOV требует конвертации.
- Аккумулятор греется при видео, садится быстрее без стабилизатора.
- Нет аксессуаров в комплекте (чехол, карта), объектив пачкается.
572 отзывов пользователей о Canon PowerShot SX210 IS
Пользовались
Canon PowerShot SX210 IS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Скромный эксперт
15.01.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I was hoping to find a still/video camera that would give me the low light performance of my Fuji F20 and also allow me to avoid hauling around a separate HD camcorder. My tests of the Canon SX210 and Nikon S8100 show that the low light photos from the SX210 are very good but the Nikon has the edge when it comes to low noise at high ISO. However, if you also want great low light video, the SX210 is in a class by itself and the Nikon simply can't compete. Credit Canon's long history building camcorders --the SX210 even outperforms the HD video quality of the $350 Canon R10 camcorder I recently tested (and returned). In my two weeks of evaluation, I've determined that the Canon SX210 is the optimum choice if you want the best balance of low light photos and good video.Here are my observations after two weeks of testing:CANON SX210 PROS-Very good low light video, video brightness control really boosts low light sensitivity.-Very good still photos, camera chooses higher ISO settings to reduce motion blur-Camera displays its ISO choice when you pre-focus (not possible with Nikon)-Extensive customization settings for every shooting mode (versus limited Nikon settings).-Widescreen LCD for full frame video display-Very good build quality-Pop up flash automatically raises or lowers when you power on/offCANON SX210 CONS-Body design makes for tricky handling (pop up flash, no rear thumb grip, smooth surfaces)-LCD is only 230K pixel (compared to the incredible Nikon 921K pixel display)-Still photo review area is much smaller on widescreen display-Overall still image quality has more noise and less sharpness compared to the Nikon-Some flash shadow at the 28mm wide angle setting (disappears from 30mm on up)NIKON S8100 PROS-Nice build quality and easy-to-handle design. Feels like a pro-sumer $600 camera.-Outrageous 3-inch, 921K pixel LCD display --amazing clarity and detail.-Decent HD video in daytime lighting.-Powerful flash that provides excellent illumination at all zoom settings (no flash shadow at wide angle).-USB battery charging in camera (can connect to your PC to charge).NIKON S8100 CONS-No manual control except for +/-exposure compensation.-No brightness or white balance settings for video (versus Canon's excellent custom controls).-Auto white balance is fooled by compact fluorescent lights (Canon's AWB is more reliable).-Camera prefers low ISO settings even in low light and this can cause motion blur.-Significant zoom motor noise during videos (versus the nearly silent Canon SX210 zoom)-Video focusing is often slow to lock (but still photo focus is fast)-Pop-up flash must be pushed back into camera body before stowing camera in case.-Camera beep and shutter release sound can only be turned on or off (no volume adjustment like Canon)STILL PHOTO QUALITY COMPARISON:Photos in good lighting are comparable between the Nikon and Canon. The Nikon has the least noise at higher ISO settings. In low light, the Nikon really shines and if you take photos of non-moving subjects, the S8100 is your best choice. However, the Nikon chooses very low ISO settings (and therefore low shutter speeds) to achieve this great performance --not good if your subjects are moving (you'll get blur). At high zoom, both cameras have to use lower shutter speeds and every super zoom camera suffers from this issue --it's the problem most people complain about when they try out their new cameras. The only way to solve this problem is to either use the flash or set high ISO (something the Canon does automatically) in order to force the camera to select a higher shutter speed. There is no other solution and no camera has yet been developed to solve this problem -it's a compromise of light, optics, and sensor sensitivity in compact camera bodies. For all around shooting, the Canon is more reliable since it chooses higher ISO (and hence faster shutter speeds) to capture non-blurry images. Both cameras do well when the flash is used but the Nikon's flash works better at telephoto settings.HD VIDEO QUALITY:Both cameras have good HD video and excellent image stabilization in good lighting. As with most super zoom compacts, focus lock in low light is a challenge but the Canon SX210 is better than the Nikon if you want faster focus lock during video. The Canon operates more like a dedicated camcorder; the Nikon operates as if video was a second thought feature. The Canon's low light video brightness, focus speed, and silent zoom motor make for great video under all conditions. Unfortunately, the Nikon's noisy zoom motor is recorded in videos and the camera simply can't provide bright, usable videos in low indoor lighting. In low light, the Canon is in a league of its own. If you're trying to video children or pets running back and forth quickly at close range to these cameras then you'll be disappointed in ANY super zoom compact camera you try. The fact is the ultimate, magic "focus anywhere instantly" machine has not yet been invented.
Скромный эксперт
27.09.2010
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I read many reviews and my choice came down to this camera, the Canon Powershot SX210 IS, and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7. I've been a long time Canon fan. That did influence my choice and I bought the Canon. Being familiar with the general control and menu system, manual layout, and computer software helps. I've had this camera for about 5 days and have taken more than 200 test and learning photos and about 25 additional photos. What follows are some impressions.In my research, I've read many complaints about the flash design. It is true that in some cases the lens housing will cast a shadow in the lower right hand corner of the photo when flash is used. I've found that zooming in ever so slightly will eliminate that. The other flash complaint that others have is that it pops up and is in an inconvenient position. I too find that the flash is often under my left index finger, but that can be a good thing as I can easily keep it down when I don't want it. I have no trouble letting it up when I want to, either. In fact, I routinely leave on the flash in the camera settings and then pop the flash up and down at will. It is much easier and faster than turning it on and off in the settings. If I'm in a place where flash is prohibited, keeping the flash down will positively keep me on the good side of the museum guards, etc. I see the pop-up flash as a huge plus, as I can easily open and close it at will. In my opinion, the flash is completely adequate for a compact camera.I find the Tv (shutter priority), Av (aperture priority) and M (manual modes) to be outstanding on this camera in ease of use and results. I couldn't be more pleased with the ease of control and the associated image on the LCD. I literally get what I see.The LCD is large and the information displayed is very welcome (easily turned off at the push of the button). The combination scroll wheel and 4-way pad is awesome. For those that don't know it, a slight touch in any direction will display the 4-way controls on the LCD (they change depending on shooting mode and therefore can't be printed on the camera). The LCD stands up to full, bright, California sun in situations where I'd have to resort to the viewfinder on my older point and shoot camera. I don't know how they did it, but it works and can be brightened even more than normal by holding the "display" button down if needed.The quality and color of the photos are great. Depending on the shot there can be a disappointing amount of CA (a.k.a. chromatic aberration or purple fringing) in the corners in high contrast situations when examining a photo pixel for pixel (an extreme view to say the least). Of course at normal viewing sizes it either can't be seen or is in the acceptable range for a camera of this class. Frankly, that is an engineering trade-off in the lens design that I accept due to this camera packing 14x optical zoom and decent wide angle performance into such a small package. I bought this camera for travel ease because I don't want to pack along my dSLR (theft, size and weight considerations). I'm willing to make that trade-off and understand what and why it is.Did I mention this camera has a 14x optical zoom with image stabilization? That's a huge plus for me. This camera puts the "super" in "superzoom". It also has decent wide angle performance.This camera handles ISO settings above 200 about as well as I've ever seen it handled in a compact camera. The Auto mode is perfectly acceptable for a quick snapshot, though I prefer to use the Program, Tv, Av, and manual modes. I find that the Auto mode does tend to favor higher ISO settings than I would choose manually. Like all cameras, even those with IS, taking a moment to frame and focus the shot, and holding as still as possible in the process still helps. You still need to follow basic good practices to get good pictures.I've found the zoom lever not to be a problem. I've quickly adjusted to it and use it with ease. I still have trouble finding the power button without looking at it or thinking about it. The good news is that I'm in no danger of turning it on or off accidentally. The knurled mode dial on the back is great. It is stiff enough to not move accidentally and loose enough to move when needed.I've only shot a few short video clips. They are acceptable for my purposes which are quick memories rather than great movies. I like the 720p HD capability. I wish they hadn't bothered with the video cable, but then again, I still have the video cable from my old camera sealed in its original bag.The battery life is not stellar, but it recharges in a couple of hours. Pick up a couple of inexpensive aftermarket batteries and you will be good to go. A nice 110 to 240 (only need the plug adapter for international travel) battery charger is included.There are a lot of fun, pre-programmed and artistic modes available, many of which I'll never use. But for those of you who want them, you will not run
Скромный эксперт
24.08.2010
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
This camera has just the feature set I wanted, and using it is a truly enjoyable experience. The best feature of the camera has to be the nice, sharp 14x wide angle zoom lens (28mm-392mm equivalent). While not the fastest lens Canon makes (f/3.1 at 28mm; compare to the S95's f/2.0 lens), it's very sharp and the camera seems to focus quickly, especially in well lit situations. The lens zooms by a small lever on the top of the camera--that's a design feature that likely will take some getting used to. It's a departure from the normal lever that surrounds the shutter. I personally like the traditional design better, but this works just fine.The camera also sports the ability to take HD movies (720p). I wanted this feature to take videos of my children, but I've found it very useful in other situations as well. My main photographic interest is nature photography, and my DSLR is too old to take movies, so I now take this with me to shoot HD video of the scenes I shoot with my DSLR. Because it lets you set your video exposure manually, you can pan the camera while shooting to achieve a nice, even exposure. This was a nice, unexpected benefit to the camera.The manual controls are also fairly accessible. There's dial that controls the on screen menus, and because the operations change in different shooting modes, they aren't printed on the camera, but if you touch the dial, they will appear on screen, and it's very easy to manually set the shutter speed, aperture, ISO and many other features. Unfortunately, the camera does not allow you to move the center focusing point to a desired position on the LCD screen. I don't know why they left this feature out, since it's helpful when using a tripod, and my older S3IS had that ability. But you're not likely to use this camera on a tripod often, so it's very easy to focus on the center point and recompose when you need to, so I haven't really missed this feature. When shooting people, you can set the camera to automatically focus on people's faces, and you can even choose a mode that will take the picture when everyone in the photograph is smiling.The design of the camera is very compact, slim and attractive. The largest complaint I've seen with the camera is that the flash automatically pops up when you turn on the camera, and if your finger is covering the flash, it will keep it from popping up. This was annoying to me at first, but I quickly learned to either hold the flash down when I don't want it or keep my finger off the flash when I do. And the flash can be manually raised or lowered at at any time, so it's not a big deal either way. The LCD screen is bright and colorful and LARGE. It takes up almost the entire back of the camera, which is very nice.My biggest gripe with the camera is that Canon decided to cram 14 mega-pixels into the tiny sensor. This has to be little more than a marketing device. With a sensor size this small, crowding this many pixels into the sensor only increases noise, and then Canon compensates for the noise by running noise reduction, which then lowers the sharpness of the image. So there's no significant gain in overall picture quality by raising the resolution of the sensor. I wish Canon would have used the same 10 mega-pixel sensor they used in the s90 with this camera. I suspect the image quality would be significantly better.That said, the image quality of this camera is pretty darn good. Especially at low ISOs (80-200), this camera performs very well. As you raise the ISO into the 400-1600 range, noise becomes a more significant factor, and Canon's noise reduction causes the image to lose detail. Because of this, I rarely use the automatic modes in lower light situations because I don't trust the camera to choose the ISO for me. I'd rather choose it myself and keep it at 400 or lower if possible. I've been very pleased with my results.When I take this camera with me on nature shoots, I now frequently take roughly the same shot with this camera and compare my results to what I achieved with my DSLR. Of course, my 10 mega-pixel Canon 40D shooting in RAW is noticeably superior to what this camera can produce. The 40D is significantly sharper, has less noise, better color, and so on. This shouldn't be surprising. At the same time, however I suspect if I printed out both shots as an 8"x10" print, you'd be hard pressed to see the difference. With the noise reduction abilities of Lightroom 3, I'd be more than willing to shoot with this camera when I don't have my DSLR available. I've been very happy with the results of this camera.This is just fun and enjoyable camera. The 14x zoom lets you get close to your subjects, and the HD movie performance is fine for well lit situations. When I researched this camera, I narrowed my choices to this camera an the S90. I chose this camera because of the 14x zoom and the ability to shoot HD movies. Faced with the choice again, I'd make the same one. I highly recomme
Скромный эксперт
31.07.2010
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
First off - background on me and what I was looking for: I would classify myself as an intermediate photographer. I own a Nikon DSLR which I use primarily for low light situations having learned the hardway at my son's 18th birthday that my old point-and-shoot did a lousy job of photos in low light situations. I am planning a trip to Europe in the fall and simply did not want to lug my Nikon camera around with me along with all the other stuff - like map, dictionary, travel guide - that I would have to take with me as I wandered around whatever town I was in. So I started my search for a really good PNS camera. What was I looking for in the PNS ? My goal in picture taking is to have a terrific photo of what I actually saw. So when I got home and looked at the photo, I would say: Yes, that's exactly what it looked like when I was there. So onto my criteria: First size. I wanted it to be small enough to fit comfortably in a pocket. Second, confidence that it would take good to great photos under normal (not low-light) conditions. Third, I liked the idea of HD videos of my trip, so I wanted that capability. Fourth and finally, at least decent performance in low light conditions as I expected to frequently want to take photos inside a museum or art gallery.The search turned out to be much more difficult than I had expected. Frustratingly difficult I will add. No one camera is loved by all reviewers. So those of you reading this review, who are still searching, I feel your pain. I came to the conclusion that currently there is no perfect PNS that does it all. I would do hours of research on the web and then go to the local camera store to actually play with the PNS cameras that had caught my interest. In the end I concluded that there are 3 or 4 reasonably good PNS cameras out there, but all of them required me to compromise on something I wanted. So figure out what your must-haves are and sort through the available cameras accordingly.Obviously I chose the Canon SX210. I have had it about 3 weeks now and have taken about 200 photos and about 6 HD movies. My comments in no particular order:1. the Canon does a good but not outstanding job of taking photos under normal daylight conditions. I did play with several photos on my computer and kept zooming in on a particular point to see when the picture would deteriorate. Of course it did eventually, but again, since 8.5 x 11 is the max size I expect for any enlargement, I do not see any problem with the picture quality.2. the HD video capability is more fun than I had expected. Again as already noted, the mic's are located on the top of the camera. Great for recording my commentary, but not so good for recording sounds coming from whatever you are videoing. One other point: the Canon allows you to zoom in while taking an HD video. That's great, but with 14X optical zoom, the more you zoom, the more susceptible the camera and the video you are taking is to shaking. If you zoom all the way to 14X, I found it impossible to avoid shaking when holding the camera in my hand. At no zoom, there is no problem with shake when taking a video. Bottom line: limit your zooming in when taking a video.3. I agree with everyone else that placement of the pop-up flash and the telephoto zoom in-and-out mechanism is NUTS. What were the Canon engineers thinking ? However both are annoyances rather than deal-breakers.4. the battery life is reasonable but not outstanding. I never ran out of battery life during a day of shooting photos and the battery re-charges in about 2-3 hours. Not bad.5. Speed - I bought 2 Sandisk Extreme III 4 GB Class 6 SD disks. I agree with the suggestions that you have to step up to a Class 6 disk to avoid serious delays when writing the photo to the disk. I also decided against one 8GB disk since I did not want all my pics on one disk. Back to speed - I also turned off the automatic review after each photo taken, and found that improved the speed of the picture taking noticeably. You can also turn on continuous picture taking and take a "burst" of photos if so desired. Bottom Line: speed is fast enough for my needs.6. Definitely buy a plastic shield (or cover?) to protect the 3" LCD screen on the back. The Apple Store has them if you can't find them cheaper any place else.7. The camera feels surprisingly heavy to me. But solid. I guess 14X optical zoom does create some weight.8. I set the camera on 9MP pictures since 14MP is overkill for me. I would never enlarge a photo to more than 8.5 x 11 anyway. I left the movie on HD settings however. Dumming down the photos to 9MP also improves the write-to-disk speed BTW.9. Expect a serious learning curve with this camera. I printed out the manual from the PDF file and it is 180 pages. Not all was relevant to me and my interests, but still I have spent several hours reading and re-reading sections of the manual. Since I will not take the manual with me on my upco
Скромный эксперт
01.04.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I love my new camera. Only complaint is the auto pop-up of the flash, which is located right where my left index finger wants to be. Otherwise, it's a handy size that fits in my purse and takes great pictures. The camera arrived in new condition as promised and was a terrific bargain at $55!
Скромный эксперт
22.04.2010
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I compared this camera to the Panny zs3 (in lieu of the zs7 which wasn't available at the time), and the Sony hx5v. I did buy and use all three cameras to do this test. You can only go by reviews written by others to a certain point, and then you need to see for yourself. The canon won out after hundreds of photographs were taken and compared among the three cameras. Here's why:1. Panasonic zs3.-The overall image quality on the panasonic just wasn't that good.-Low light performance and IQ was very poor.-The form factor was good-I didn't like the fact that the battery was expensive, proprietary and had a firmware bit that made 3rd party batteries inoperable, meaning that a spare battery was a $40 expense.-Several photography sites have stated that the IQ of the zs7 was not as good as the zs3. Therefore, the zs7 was out of contention.-While gps is interesting, I have managed all these years to go without it and don't believe that it adds much to the package.2. Sony hx5v-burst mode at a maximum of 10 fps is very nice. The downside is that the camera does in fact take 17+ seconds to process all that data and during that time you cannot take a photo.-Hand held twilight is nice, though IQ is average-Anti blur motion is also nice, again, IQ is average-25mm wide angle (at 35mm equivalent)is nice.-Form factor is okay, however, the microphones for the video are poorly placed and are exactly where your fingers fall when videoing.-Flash is weak and shows up off centered if you shoot with a wide angle-No iris - uses a neutral density filter to achieve an ersatz f-stop. Therefore, you get one depth of field for all photos.-With the ND filter, you get only 2 f-stops.-Image quality was poor at any magnification. Heavy use of noise reduction obliterates and smears detail in the photo. For desktop viewing and small prints this won't be a problem.-the lcd screen was just about useless in very low light. And since the camera has no view finder, you have to guess what is properly framed or not.-poor white balance.--While I did take video with the camera I didn't fully evaluate it since I was not pleased with the stills. However, the low light video at late dusk and around the house was dark and flat and not really viewable.- as with the Panasonic, gps really isn't important to me and I'd be paying for something I don't see a use for having.3. Canon sx210 is-good image quality, some noise above ISO 200, but correctable with Neat Image-I thought the 14x zoom would be too much, in fact, it is nice to have.-It would be nice to have 25mm on the wide angle end and reduce it to 12x on the tele end.-burst mode is not too bad with a fast card (SD Class 6)...cycles at 0.7 seconds. Nowhere near as fast as the Sony at 10fps, but gets the job done. Importantly, you can continue to take photos until the card fills and it is never "busy" processing images. So there is a trade off. With the Sony, you get 10 shots in a second and have to wait 17 - 20 seconds to take the next shot. Or with the Canon you get about 4 frames in 3 seconds and you can just keep shooting. To me, that was somewhat important since the photo I might really want could occur soon after I used the burst mode on the Sony and I'd just have to watch it go by.-very good low light performance in manual mode or auto mode-much brighter lcd screen for viewing in low light. Low light video far better than the Sony.-the fact that you can manually close the flash is great in my opinion. Several reviewers have complained about it - however, I like it because when it is closed, it is off. In other P&S cameras, depending on how I would change the shooting mode among program, auto and others, the flash may become active without me thinking about it. And at times when flash is not allowed nothing is worse than having a flash go off. With the sx210, when the flash is off, it is off.-video is very good as is sound quality. The hd is in 720p and that is just fine, and when viewed on TV, it looks great.-I do think that the form factor could be improved - give me a little something to grip. It's not bad, but it could be improved.-A low light mode is available that pushes the ISO to 3200. It gets the picture, but it is certainly noisy (clean up with Neat Image).-somewhere in this camera the cost savings for not implementing gps is made up somewhere else. I think it is image quality.The Canon sx210 won out - primarily because of image quality. Some of the features on the Sony were very nice and I had to give it a lot of consideration before keeping the Canon and returning the Sony. But in the end, a camera is all about the image and when taken with the other capabilities of the camera, that nod goes to Canon.UPDATE later this same day: While thinking on the burst mode question and thinking of a work-around I experimented and checked the burst mode in different shooting modes, compressions and resolution and found that if you shoot in the low light option (within the scene mode) you can get about
Скромный эксперт
20.04.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
NOTE: If you are confused about some of the issues brought up in the negative reviews, including the LENS SHADOW ISSUE, please read my commentary under the UPDATE section at the end of this review and feel free to ask any additional questions.___________________________________________________________________REVIEWPeople have already written excellent reviews for the black version of this camera and, obviously, everything applies to the Gold version as well. I will summarize my own experience with the camera and update the review as I learn more. Feel free to ask any questions.I am a hobbyist and own a Canon DSLR with some high end lenses and accessories. It's a great setup, but because of its size and weight I rarely have it with me. I got sick of missed opportunities and knew I needed a pocket camera to take with me everywhere.I've owned a Canon Powershot SX110IS 9MP Digital Camera with 10x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom (Black) previously and thought it was great, which is why I considered getting the Canon PowerShot SX120IS 10MP Digital Camera with 10x Optical Images Stabilized Zoom and 3-inch LCD this time. However, it's not pocketable, so I've also considered the amazing Canon PowerShot S90 10MP Digital Camera with 3.8x Wide Angle Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 3-inch LCD, Panasonic DMC-LX3 10.1MP Digital Camera with 24mm Wide Angle MEGA Optical Image Stabilized Zoom (Black), and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1/H 10MP "Exmor R" CMOS Digital Camera with 3-inch Touch-Screen LCD (Grey). These are all great on their own, but lack the zoom, and Sony also lacks manual modes. When I finally saw an SX210 at a local store, I almost bought it on the spot. It's pocketable yet boasts 14x optical zoom and all the benefits of the SX120 plus more!Color: The Gold color is actually quite pleasant. It isn't the "bling" bright yellow gold as it might appear on pictures. It's a softer champagne-like gold that I personally love. It's perfect if you want something unique, yet not obnoxious. I was excited that Canon provides a color choice for this camera.Size: The SX210 isn't as tiny as some Elphs or other manufacturer's (like Sony) pocket cams, yet it's borderline pocketable and quite light. I can put it in the back pocket of fitted jeans comfortably, although I definitely recommend a pouch (it won't fit into my back pocket with a pouch though).Design: Nothing special about the design, but it looks classy and serious. Looks much more substantial than the somewhat plasticky SX1XX line. There aren't many buttons, but it's enough for easy and fast operation. If you've used Canon point and shoots before, you'll find the interface familiar, although it looks more sleek and refined than the slightly outdated SX110 interface.The control (not the mode) dial is actually not physically labeled. BUT when the camera is on, touching the control dial slightly will display the functions of the buttons. Touch the left side of the dial and it will highlight the function for the left button and bring up a brief description. This allows for a dynamic arrangement of functions in various modes and although it took a little getting used to, I'm a big fan.The mode dial is way too stiff for my liking and requires two fingers to operate. At least it won't change accidentally...The flash position did startle me at first, but now I don't mind it at all. Yes, your finger is over the flash and it tries to pop up when you turn the camera on. However, the finger will suppress the flash popping up, and most of the time you don't want flash up anyway. So it's strange, but it works out in the end.Screen: I would prefer a regular aspect ratio screen to the wide one on the SX210. It's catered towards HD video, but I use it more for pictures, so with the black borders around pictures it effectively becomes a 2.5" screen. But it's a minor drawback and the screen is gorgeous otherwise. It's much more accurate in terms of colors and exposure than the Sony TX1 screen I've tried.There isn't much of a bezel around it, so I'd recommend a screen protector. (Don't use those film ones, use a stiff glass or plastic one. There are many available on amazon and ebay - you don't need a specifically SX210 one, just get one big enough and cut it to size. What I did is get a screen protector from a local Verizon store - they have nice stiff ones for the touchscreen phones like Droid and cost only $12 for 3 of them. When the protector is on, it looks exactly like the screen without a protector, which cannot be said about those film ones).Operation: It's not the fastest camera around and the zoom is a little slow, although smooth. I've found it to be just fine for everyday shooting and the smooth zooming works great on videos (with other cams I'd often overshoot). As I said, the interface is in line with most Canon's point and shoots.Image quality: Canon rarely disappoints in this aspect. The images are perfectly sharp (unlike the Sony TX1) and the colors are vivid yet accurate (unli
Скромный эксперт
06.04.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
m269IQ0CFACC9V / moROKE6X6XJ97R Length:: 1:33 MinsUpdate 5/31/2011 You may want to consider the new SX230. It has a faster CMOS chip which will give you better low light picture quality. This was my biggest complaint with the SX210is.Update: 7-19-2010 The video that I posted today is to answer questions about the camera's cycle rate. It is not an overall camera review but a demonstration of how long it takes the shutter to fire and a demonstration of the "wicked fast" continuous mode. I posted the continuous mode photos on my Google Picasa account which can be viewed by going to my Amazon profile page.I am a professional motion picture camera assistant and an advanced hobby photographer. I own a Nikon D90 and several other compact cameras. There are times that I wanted to bring a decent camera but didn't want to haul my SLR kit around with me. I have always felt like I had to make a big compromise until now. This camera captures amazing images for such a compact device. If wanted it also allows for full control of all aspects of your shots including ASA, shutter time and aperture. The HD video it captures is fantastic and it does this without the need to hand focus like my D90.The first thing that you will notice when you get the camera is that it is very small. It is the size camera you can put in a belt case and forget you have it with you.Controls - I am use to more direct access to the controls but anyone who is familiar with SLR photography can easily navigate the controls without a manual. Amateurs or those unfamiliar with SLR controls have two great options, Auto or EZ mode. You can put this camera into the hands of an inexperienced photographer and if they can compose a shot, and have fundamental consideration of lighting, they can get technically great pictures.Colors are accurate with excellent black detail for this price range camera. This camera achieves a level of image quality that was available only from professional SLR cameras a few years ago.Once you turn on the camera, you are going to be impressed with the wide end of this cameras lens. For vista shots, it does not show wide lens distortion. For close wide shots, it does show an acceptable amount distortion that is fun to shoot with. When I took this camera on a family trip, I was easily able to hold the camera myself and get all 4 of us in the shot. The only issue that I have with this wide mode is that it will not fully translate in a standard 4X6 print. You will loose the sides of the pictures when you print. I hope that the 16X9 HD ratio will become a standard for future photo prints. Of course you can set the camera to shoot a standard 4X6 printThe long end of the zoom is equally amazing. The image stabilization seems as good as Nikon's VR system.The SX210is focuses almost as quickly as my SLR Nikon D90 in still mode.Contunuous Mode- The camera can record 2 FPS in continuous mode. It is a lot of fun to record action sequences or take a series of photos if you have the need to grab a lot of shots in a short time. I posted a few series of shots on my Google Picasa site that can be viewed through my profile page, or paste:[...]Movie Mode - The camera really shines in video mode, it focuses quickly and tracks action well. This Canon camera can continuously focus the image rather than having to press the button halfway to activate focus.In video mode, the exposure shifts in steps rather than gradual transitions. In other words, the exposure could be good for a particular scene and as it transitions to a different lighting scenario the exposure clicks to the proper exposure. Dedicated video cameras transition more smoothly between different lighting conditions than still camera shooting in video mode.It shoots 720p movies that rival a dedicated video camera. The optical 14X zoom is amazing. This camera could take the place of a stand-alone video camera for many people. The audio quality is good but not fantastic. You can notice the steady shot while shooting videos. It works well until you get to long end of the lens where you will notice that the image jumps around when you try to hold a steady frame. In reality, you would never want to shoot zoomed in all the way.Con's- I'm getting picky here but you should know...I would have liked a viewfinder. Shooting in bright sunlight can be difficult with the LCD screen. I also find that resting the camera against your head helps steady shots.I wasn't really crazy about the exposed LCD screen. The screen is made of glass rather than plastic, which is nice. If placed LCD side down it does not rest flat on the screen. It instead rests on the mode rotary dial and the opposite corner of the camera. I wish manufactures would engineer a slightly raised screen bezel to prevent scratches to the screen.I think it could have been better if the microphones were in front of, rather than on top of the camera. There isn't enough separation between microphones to realize ste
Показаны отзывы 1-8 из 572.
|
Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX210 IS, черный/серебристый | Яндекс Маркет | 35 300 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX210 IS, черный/серебристый | Яндекс Маркет | 36 900 ₽ | Посмотреть |
График изменения цены Canon PowerShot SX210 IS
Характеристи Canon PowerShot SX210 IS
Информация о характеристиках носит справочный характер.
Перед покупкой уточняйте характеристики и комплектацию товара у продавца
Обзоры и руководства на Canon PowerShot SX210 IS
Похожие товары с лучшей оценкой
Wizemart © 2026.
Рекомендательная система по умному выбору товаров по отзывам и рейтингам
