Отзывы о Мфу Canon Pixma G3410
938 отзывов пользователей о Canon Pixma G3410
Пользовались
Canon Pixma G3410?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Сатурниан-4NOOT
27.02.2019
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
отличная модель
Приобретенным МФУ очень довольны. Хорошее качество печати, сканирования и копирования. С установкой и подключением тоже никаких проблем не возникло. Спасибо.
Астероид-9ZHGX
13.03.2018
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + СНПЧ, низкая стоимость чернил, быстрая и лёгкая настройка беспроводной связи с мобильными устройствами по wi-fi
- - Беспроводную связь с ноутбуком на Win10 настроить получилось только обновив микропрограмму с 1.020 до 1.030. Мощность прм./ прд. Wi-Fi средняя, пришлось для 3-х комнатной квартиры покупать ретранслятор, телефоны связь с основным роутером держали.
Хороший добротный принтер/МФУ, со всеми задачамиНО в отличии от одного известного производителя-у этого слишком устарело морально и технически штатное ПО. В отличии от другого легендарного производителя принтеров/мфу- штатное ПО очень сложно и долго решает простейшие задачи. Со всеми задачами справляется, ну если не на "отлично", так по крайней мере на "хорошо" это точно. Кароч. РЕКОМЕНДУЮ!
Супернова-3UVCT
09.04.2018
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
отличная модель
О долгосрочном использовании пока говорить рано, но пока печатает и сканирует отлично. В первые же дни был напечатан достаточно большой объем (сравнимый с ресурсом картриджа в обычных принтерах), уровень чернил при этом упал довольно незначительно. Совет будущим владельцам: после установки картриджей и заливки чернил сразу настраивайте беспроводное соединение через телефон/планшет на Android/IOS, а затем через web-интерфейс принтера обновляйте прошивку. (подсказка: администраторский пароль в web-интерфейсе изначально совпадает с серийным номером принтера)
НаноПилигрим-4XRGN
18.06.2018
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- + МФУ, Wi-Fi
- - При простое МФУ в пару дней, краска стекает по трубкам, образуя пузыри и приходится прочищать систему подачи краски. Через год засрался "памперс", который не меняется!! Меняется вместе с материнской платой, которая стоит !!!!11000руб!!!! НЕ БЕРИТЕ ЭТО БАРАХЛО!!!!!!
Спектроник-6NSAS
02.03.2018
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
хорошая модель
- + СПНЧ, великолепные фото, работа с облачными хранилищами, поддержка ИОС и Андроид.
- - Штатное ПО морально и технически устарело в отличии от одного производителя и слишком сложно и муторно в отличии от другого культового производителя принтеров/МФУ
За несколько дней использования в основном только положительные эмоции.
Качество печати существенно улучшилось после обновления микропрограммы с 1.020 до 1.030 через веб интерфейс принтера.
Качество печати существенно улучшилось после обновления микропрограммы с 1.020 до 1.030 через веб интерфейс принтера.
Квантум-6QPHG
02.05.2018
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + По сравнению с бывшим HP,превосходно,пока месяц живёт,краски съел не много, при условии ,что печатаются фото хорошего качества.
- - Подключение по Wi-Fi,жена сама не справилась бы. ПО нечем не порадовало. Дисплей не особо понятен.
При использовании ранее 2-х принтеров на работе ,и одного HP дома,эта модель в лидерах.
Гиперион-6KWNC
24.07.2018
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
обычная модель
- + Подача краски
- - Проработал 8 месяцев
Трудно настраивается .
Проработал 8 месяцев и вылезла ошибка фатальная.
Проработал 8 месяцев и вылезла ошибка фатальная.
Супернова-3FWHS
20.06.2018
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- + Принтер может и хороший. Только он не поддерживает MAC os.
- - Нет драйвером под мак в 2018 году. Весело обнаружить этотпосле заправки чернилами. Пипец просто.
НаноРейдер-6SNKZ
24.07.2018
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
обычная модель
Трудно настраивается . Проработал 8 месяцев и вылезла ошибка фатальная.
Кварковец-6LZEV
30.04.2018
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Быстро настроил подключение как с телефона, так и с компа. Все печатает здорово и без проблем
- - Пока не выявил
Зета-Орион-8LSQF
02.03.2018
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
хорошая модель
За несколько дней использования в основном только положительные эмоции. Качество печати существенно улучшилось после обновления микропрограммы с 1.020 до 1.030 через веб интерфейс принтера.
Супернова-1XTHR
21.03.2018
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
обычная модель
- + не выявил
- - не поддерживает он Apple AirPrint!!!! трудно настроить беспроводную печать с компьютера!!!
не рекомендую
Гравитон-1DLZX
21.03.2018
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
обычная модель
не рекомендую
Пульсар-5ILHL
16.11.2015
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
- + Хорошее качество печати.
- - Дорогие картриджи и краски.
Принтер хороший. Качество и скорость печати отличная. Сканирование и копирование проходит...
Плазмоид-3PCPM
30.01.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + МФУ, wi-fi, дизайн, простота использования
- - ресурс 220 страниц - он даже до 70 страниц на картридже увеличенной ёмкости не дотягивает
У меня первый принтер был Epson - засыхали чернила за неделю, в остальном был гуд...
Вояджер-9WLGF
30.04.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + wi-fi, автоподача, цена (т.к. покупал около 3,5 т.р. осенью 2012)
- - не разобрался, как настроить сканер так, что бы не "светлил"
Кое в чем недоразбирался, но отнес бы это скорее к своим недостаткам, а не устройства: скан светлит, а фотки на глянцевой фотобумаге с чрезмерно яркими красным и желтым. Как закончились...
Спектроник-0UZQY
15.08.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Очень хорошее мфу,качество фотографий просто изумительно!Текст печатает очень быстро,есть wifi!Сканер...
Квантум-1DRTE
12.05.2010
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Компактный
- - По сравнению с нынешними принтерами то он отдыхает по качеству и скорости, но на то время было мега круто..
Короч валяется у...
ОмниКод-8NYZJ
09.11.2019
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Плохая модель
- + Функциональность, СНПЧ, wi-fi. Быстрая печать документов
- - Работает громко, печать фото А4 очень низкого качества, Походит только печатать графики, заголовки другим цветом, не более. Постоянно и подолгу чистит головки после каждого включения. Настройка wi-fi это танец с бубном вокруг принтера. Но...
Супернова-1IWUR
06.05.2020
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Очень плохая модель
- + Принтер печатает хорошо.
- - После около года использования и печати порядка 3000 листов он ушел в ошибку 5B00 (переполнение "памперса") и его придется везти в платный ремонт. У предыдущего у меня Canon 3400 это же было после 15000 листов (это можно понять). Тутже периодически чернила сливались из трубок, принтер переставал печатать черным и приходилось проводить процедуру заполнения трубок, которая безбожно перегоняла черные чернила в памперс. После 4-5 таких...
Вояджер-4JEJO
15.06.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Купил себе неделю назад. Приобретал body + объектив canon ef50 f1.8. Успел отснять около 800 фотографий. Снимаю в основном ребенка (1.7 года). В солнечную погоду на спортивном режиме фото получается про чудо))) рекомендую с таким объективом не пожалеете)).
МехаРейнджер-5QUBC
13.09.2012
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
небольшая матрица, средняя чувствительность, низкая скорость серийной съёмки, маленький дисплей
Спектроник-9GGOT
31.07.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
И комментировать нечего, всё по делу и всё что надо.
Туманник-6NYDA
05.03.2024
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Плохая модель
- + Покупала принтер для школы , печатать детям грамоты и наглядный материал. Получила принтер 21.01, 7.02 уже пошёл дефект печати . Прошу связаться продавца для решения проблемы
НоваГость-5KQKQ
05.03.2024
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + печатает достойно
Странник-9ZEQH
07.12.2023
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Очень плохая модель
- - Не могу найти картридж черный нет в продаже
Небулоид-3KMDT
07.12.2023
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Очень плохая модель
- + Полный отстой и это ещё достоинство
- - Один сплошной недостаток, надеюсь что его создателю нормально не спится
Небулоид-6SBOU
26.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I suppose that I am "late to the party" regarding the Canon PS S100. The S110 is already out as its replacement, and it is, of course, a fine camera. The time finally came to replace my venerable Digital Elph S50, and I did an enormous amount of research trying to decide what to replace it with for my "pocketable" walk-around camera. I tend to prefer Nikon for SLRs and Canon for small cameras (both are excellent), and my research continued to support the notion that Canon is right at the forefront for small cameras.Many recent reviewers have concentrated their reviews on comparing the S110 and the S100. I mostly will not. Since I have been absent from the small camera market scene for seven years, this review will instead mostly dwell on the improvements of the S100 over the earlier models, which observations I hope that someone will find useful. Very briefly, with respect to the excellent S110, for me the deciding factor in favor of the S100 are the analog controls and the non-presence of a touchscreen. Ergonomically I like the big shutter button and the all-analog controls of the S100. I tend to find touchscreen control of a camera non-intuitive; perhaps I am just a product of the baby-boomer generation. To further date myself, I miss the optical viewfinder that used to be standard on cameras of this class. Like almost all of its competition, the S100 uses the rear LCD as an electronic viewfinder. This is the wave of the future and the S100 is no exception. I am adapting.Examining the S100 I can see that Canon has improved much over the earlier generation of cameras. The first thing I am going to comment upon is the image quality -- it is very, very good. Almost astounding, in fact for a camera of this size. Digital SLRs of a decade ago would be hard-pressed to take on the S100. Somehow Canon has squeezed a lot of performance out of the relatively small lens on the S100; partly due to its excellent sensor. This camera will effortlessly produce excellent images even under difficult light conditions. The image stabilization ("IS") feature (together with this camera's excellent high ISO performance) made it possible for me to take reasonably sharp photos of nighttime Christmas lights, which is something my older pocket cameras could never accomplish to my satisfaction.The next improvement that I found pleasing on the S100 is the user interface. It is very intuitive. Canon has knocked most or all of the rough edges off of its interface. I found it very easy to quickly adapt to it, which was not true of my earlier Canon circa 2002. The AUTO function allows the user to be taking pictures right out of the box in a matter of minutes. The "P" (Program) mode has many more features but nevertheless is easy to figure out and master. To my surprise both aperture and speed priority settings are right there on the top control dial, so users who wish to really control their photos, e.g. depth of field or action blurring shots, will be at home with this camera.My final main observation concerning the S100 is its amazing feature set. As noted above, it features both Program, Aperture, and Focus-priority settings. Like a full-blown SLR it allows center-weighted metering, "evaluative" metering, and spot metering. It has a variety of different focusing modes. It also has scene settings mode and a "filter effects" mode which allows a number of interesting effects such as B&W, sepia, vivid colors, and other effects. This camera allows the photographer to approach his or her shooting in a variety of different ways, and you really have to work at it to produce poor pictures with this camera. The AUTO or Scene settings will allow the shooter to let the camera make most of the decisions or, alternatively, the camera allows about as much flexibility as an SLR camera.Using a 32GB SD card the S100 will take approximately 10,000 photos, depending upon whether the shooter elects to shoot RAW, JPEG, or RAW+JPEG. Pretty amazing considering that only a decade or so ago we were all shooting 36 images on film and then paying ten dollars to get it developed so that we could see how our pictures turned out. There is no reason other than backup to worry about one's images on any vacation with this camera.I elected to go with the black version of the S100 and I am well-pleased with it. The black looks very snappy and professional. The aluminum body has a nice anti-skid texture that is very pleasing to the eyes and to the touch, and there is a rubber grip on the front that further aids in gripping the camera. The one issue as far as handling is concerned is that I do occasionally find my left hand blocking the pop-up flash at times. You have to watch that with this camera. Another nit: there is no recess or protective lip for the beautiful LCD viewfinder on the back of this camera. Buying one of the after-market protective products is an absolute must if you wish to avoid scratching this screen. Many are avail
Дроид-1BFBF
04.09.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This camera is PHENOMENAL ... but if you want it to work right, you need to put in the time to understand how it works and to test all of the many shooting options that are offered. Perhaps, if you are looking for the best pocket camera which takes awesome photos by just turning it on, pointing and shooting, this may not be the best choice (I suspect the canon 300 HS would be one of the best for this). But if you are looking for a camera capable of taking superb pictures with excellent picture quality that require just a little understanding of how to utilize the settings, or if you want a fantastic pocket camera which allows you to manipulate all the basic controls of an old, standard film-35mm, it is hard to imagine you could find better (though if you have the money and pocketability is not of supreme importance, the Fuji Film Fine Pix x100 would be my pick ... at $1200).I spent easily over 1 month doing research on all all sorts of cameras (various models of Lumix, Nikon, Sony, Olympus, other Canons, a couple of others and the FujiFilm) before i bought this. While in the end i am very happy with my selection, it took way too long for me to sort through all the customer reviews here, the professional reviews on CNET, DPReviews, Youtube, etc. The many reviews here on Amazon helped immensely in trying to make my choice, but I have to say I was a bit confused at first and then concerned by the extremes of comments (lots of 5 stars and a good bit of 1 star reviews). I am writing this for other Amazon users in order to help make sense of this situation. (just for reference, i am a visual artist and have a good amount of experience with photography and cameras.)1. the negative reviews are mostly because of a lens error problem which affected a good number of units of this model. fear not about this ... canon seems to have taken responsibility for this if you get one of these lemons (and in my experience with canon, they are very good with making good on their mistakes). most of the units with this problem were corrected (the S100's with a serial number beginning with numbers 29 through 41 are the ones seemingly affected by the error and most of these have been sold or recalled or fixed).2. most of the negative reviews regarding picture quality are absurd. if you just put the thing on "auto" and press the button and hope every picture is going to be great, you will likely be disappointed. this camera takes a little more getting to know than the typical pocket camera because it is more complex, but this allows you to be able to do things that most other cameras of this sort cannot do. you just have to invest a little time. PEOPLE SAYING THAT THE IMAGE QUALITY IS CRAP ARE ALL JUST WRONG - they just have not put the time into learning how to use this camera and use it properly. i was going from an old Powershot s500 that i LOVED. this was only 5 m-pixels, but it was easy to use and took really nice, balanced photos with great ease. when i first fired up the s100, i was a bit afraid that some of what was said about the picture quality was true, but after taking 20 or sometimes 30 pictures of the same thing in the same light, i was able to really understand the differences in what the settings and modes do and was able to get a feel for using the auto-modes as well as manipulating the ISO, aperture, and shutterspeed ... and i get not just great but SUPERB photos. now, after a couple of weeks, i sometimes still need to snap 3 or 4 pictures until i get one i like, but that photo is an excellent image ... one so much better than almost every compact camera i have ever seen (and with my research, i looked at buckets of sample photos from all sorts of cameras.pros:image quality - i looked at probably about 20+ compact cameras, their sample pictures and sample shots of all of them at different ISO's: this canon had the best image quality of all of them bar the pricey fujifilm x100 (which was gorgeous but this is also not really a compact camera). at ISO 800, the s100 retains more definition and colour saturation than all of the others (i think there was an olympus that came in close ).low-light shots - MOST PEOPLE THINK THE MEGA-PIXELS ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT THING IN THE CAMERA ... NOT SO. while the s100 has ample m-pixels, it is all about the size of the sensor and the aperture range. this camera has one of the biggest sensors (7.44 x 5.58 ... and a good quality CMOS) and the low end the aperture goes down to 2.0, so you have the ability to take really nice low-light shots. also has a good (digic 5) processor.controlability - this camera allows you to control everything important in your photo; f-stop 2.0 - 5.9 has a great range for a camera this size, ISO 80 - 6400, and 1/2000 sec. - 15 sec. shutter speed. there really aren't other cameras that can give you this.macro capability - i have never seen a camera that can take pictures at 3 cm like this, maybe a couple of full size SLRs fitted with macro lenses, but he s100 g
Аэронавт-9MAFV
02.07.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Below is an email that I have just received from Canon weeks after registering my camera on their website.******************************************************Dear Michael,This service notification e-mail contains important information about your Canon PowerShot S100. Please note that product service announcement e-mails contain advisory or informational content that may be critical to the proper operation of your product, including safety, update, and instructional messages. Please carefully review the information in this e-mail as it relates to your Canon product.Thank you for using Canon products.It has been confirmed that some PowerShot S100 digital cameras encounter a lens error caused by a disconnected part inside the camera. This announcement conveys the details of the issue and Canon's service policy for affected cameras.Canon continuously strives to provide our customers with high quality, reliable products that can be used with confidence. We offer our sincerest apologies to any customers who have been inconvenienced.PhenomenonSome PowerShot S100 units (with the serial numbers listed below) may encounter a lens error due to a part becoming disconnected inside the lens. In particular, this lens error may occur when the camera is used in certain environmental conditions such as high temperature and/or humidity.Affected Product:Some PowerShot S100 Digital Cameras within the following serial number range:The first and second digits of the camera's serial number are any number from "29" through "41". For example: "29xxxxxxxxxx", "30xxxxxxxxxx"........."41xxxxxxxxxx"(The [x] characters shown above represent the remaining characters of the product's serial number.)Market SupportAffected products that exhibit this phenomenon will be repaired free of charge, regardless of the warranty status, if it is confirmed that the lens error has been caused by disconnection of the part inside the lens. However, please note that affected products which are received by Canon after their service period ends (the period during which such products are expected to be serviceable), will no longer be eligible for free repair service and will be handled in accordance with Canon's then general repair standards and regulationsSupportThis information is for residents of the United States and Puerto Rico only. If you do not reside in the USA or Puerto Rico, please contact the Canon Customer Support Center in your region.Thank you,Customer Support OperationsCanon U.S.A., Inc.Contact Information for Inquiries:Canon Customer Support CenterPhone: 1-800-OK-CANON (toll free)1-800-652-2666TTD: 1-866-251-3752 (toll free)E-mail: carecenter@cits.canon.comFor additional support options:[...]******************************************************************I luckily received a camera with a serial number that should be unaffected by the lens errors some others are having. I am really liking my camera so far so I have no reason to give it anything other than 5 stars. I know my way around the manual settings of this camera, but I am far from a professional so I will hold off on a lengthy review. The programmable control ring really makes the manual settings easily changeable. Between the control ring and the sleek black color, its obvious you've got yourself something a little more substantial than a digital Elph. This camera just does everything it is supposed to do very well. The 5x zoom is inadequate for long distance shots, but that is not what this camera is for. If you are interested in carrying a compact digital camera with all the major settings of your DSLR, this is a great option. I think this camera makes a great compact alternative and companion to a DSLR because it is easily pocketable and has great manual settings. I recommend that you register your camera on Canon's website immediately because it guarantees you support and has provided me with this useful information that I would not have known otherwise. I plan on updating this review.UPDATE #1In every way, I have found this camera to be a vast improvement over my previous compact digital camera, a 10.1MP Powershot ELPH SD88IS, however; it is not without issues. Notably, the battery life is very poor when the default GPS mode is active. I could not tell you exactly how many shots I have been able to get per charge, but it has been noticeably less than I would expect. I already ordered a backup battery and am considering toggling the GPS as I need it. This battery is the same basic battery that was in my 4-5 year old Elph. I think it is time Canon looks at updating these NB5L batteries. In addition, while the image quality for day shots is tremendous, I was not overly impressed shooting with a tripod at night. I could not get more than a few half decent shots of a full moon for the life of me. Despite my best efforts, I was having issues with exposure and focus. I found underexposing and bracketing the focus to make for the best shots. Reviewer Sheraz A. Cho
Сатурниан-7GYBM
08.12.2012
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I take a lot of photos and video of the little one and my video camera is often too bulky so I bought this camera for the f2.0 24mm equivalent lens (good for indoor photos), RAW capability (good for the occasional portrait of the kid, if she'd sit still), compact size, and 1080 HD.The first camera I got from Amazon I returned because it had a bad pixel. Was invisible when viewed on the camera viewscreen - not enough resolution - but became visible when viewing photos or video at 100%.Also very annoying was the flash delay. Most cameras set the exposure when you push the shutter button halfway down but this one doesn't for flash pictures. Instead, it seems to take an initial flash to get the exposure, then a second flash to take the final picture. I don't have equipment to time the delay but it's somewhere around a half-second. That might not seem like much but it's an eternity if the subject is moving.Another annoying feature - the camera always chooses a low shutter speed and low ISO regardless of the mode, so in low light I'd get fine-grained but blurry photos of anything moving. Fortunately there's a workaround for that problem (see below if you're still foolishly thinking of getting this camera)Another unfortunate feature (one that at least I knew of beforehand) is that the lens is 2.0 only at the 24mm setting and closes rapidly as you zoom in. For me it's most noticeable when taking video in low light. At 24mm the scene will look bright, but grow very dark as I zoom in.Tried desperately to find another camera with similar capabilities but at the time there weren't any (I should've waited a few more months) so I reluctantly bought another S100. Big mistake. After a few months (too long to return the camera to Amazon) I noticed a clicking noise in the videos. Very obvious unless the background noise is loud. There are lots of examples on Youtube. I've talked to Canon and they seem oblivious. First time I sent the camera in for repairs they responded that it was "within normal operating parameters", which means they did nothing. The second time after long phone calls convincing the customer service rep to look at the camera again they sent it back saying the "optical assembly did not operate properly" and was replaced, but the very first time I tried it the noises were still there! I still haven't gotten an honest answer from Canon if the clicking is normal or not.Gave it two stars because I really like the f2.0/24mm capability, but every time I pull this thing out I feel cheated.Bottom line: If you take photos of bowls of fruit, sunsets, or mountain lakes then maybe you'll be ok. If you take snapshots of friends and family then you'll be endlessly frustrated like me. DON'T GET THIS CAMERA!!!!!If you're stuck with an S100 there are a few workarounds:For the shutter speed problem choose Shutter Priority mode (Tv) and set the desired shutter speed to what you'd prefer (typically 1/250 to 1/500 for action) Then in the menu settings make sure "Safety Shift" is ON. The camera will try to take photos at the desired shutter speed by upping the ISO or opening the aperture, and only if it can't will it lower the shutter speed.For the clicking video use manual focus. There are several major problems - first of all obviously the camera won't autofocus so if you aren't good at estimating distances, or not good focusing with the viewscreen, or more importantly if you subject moves then you're out of luck. Second, it takes several button pushes to get the camera into manual focus so there's a delay. Again, only a few seconds but if you're taking snapshots then key moments can easily disappear in those few seconds. The camera won't stay in manual focus when turned off so you'll have to change to manual focus each time you turn on the camera. Third, video and photo modes keep the same focus settings, so if you go to manual focus for video you have to remember to go back to autofocus for photos. If you forget then your photos will be out of focus!
Странник-5KAUT
29.01.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I am am an amatuer, but I love to take photos.My photography usage is Travel pics and everyday shots.I almost never take video.I used to always use a "fixed lens" 1/2" sensor camera (like the cameras you see in the Walmart displays...they look like small DSLR cameras) until I bought a Canon ELPH SD1200 a few years back for it's portability. It's imagery was AWESOME when I 1st bought it, but I think too much time in powdery desert and maybe time in general degraded the sensor. It was never the same after BurningMan. I looked for a quality replacement after the lens recently got scratched from Kuwait sand.If you are looking for a TRUE pocket camera to take normal everyday pics, then buy one of those. They run significantly less than these and they are decent cameras with EXCELLENT portability (smaller than a pack of cigarettes).I bought this Powershot S100 at the same time as a Sony NEX 5N.I did a TON of research and if you want a DSLR quality camera that is "compact", look into the Sony NEX. There are cons to it (like expensive lenses and add-ons), but it is a GREAT camera for the price. I bought mine on sale for 425.00. They usually come with a standard 18-55mm lens which is great for my uses (see above).I also got this Canon S100 to have as an ELPH replacement.I haven't taken many pics with it yet and I haven't travelled with it, but it's a decent camera so far. I like the focus ring, menus, quality of AUTO mode, SCENES, movie mode quality and RAW image support. I bought mine on sale for 220.00It's a good everyday carry camera for that price. Had you paid over 300.00 I think you paid too much.Now if you dont understand Camera sensors etc. Keep this in mind. You will NEVER match a DSLR with a regular compact camera. The closest you will get to a DSLR in a "compact" is with a "mirrorless" 4/3 model. That's a WHOLE subject in and of itself.In that regard...until recently the way to go was with a 4/3 interchangeble lens camera. The Sony NEX has completely changed the rules providing a APS-C sized lens in a 4/3 body.(Think of APS-C cameras as those "cheaper" DSLR cameras like the Canon Rebel i3.)If you are looking for a fairly inexpensive camera to take GREAT pics but dont want to spend 800.00 - 1000 or more, look into a APS-C, or 4/3 interchangable lens camera. Period.You can find really good cameras in this range usually for 500-700If you want a "pocket" camera that takes "GOOD" pics, look into anything between 150.00 - 250.00. (Elphs are under 200.00)If you are looking into something inbetween "good" and "great" @ 200 - 400 and dont mind size too much, look into something like a Panasonic with a Leica lens (2/3" or 1/2" sensor). (still will NEVER match a APS-C sensor DSLR)If you are looking for a "professional" "pocket" camera to take GREAT pics...again, you're going to have to up your price to 400 and up.That all being said, this is a really GOOD pocket camera. The only thing I dont like about it is the lens shutter (part that closes over the lens when not in use) The Elph is like that as well and that's how the lens got scratched. That shutter is FLIMSY. Everything else on the camera feels like it's very well made.Matching up pics in the same environments between the Sony NEX 5N and this camera has provided me with a DEFINATIVE answer that in NO way can the two compete. They are on two COMPLETELY different levels of quality.I gave it 4 stars because for the price it's a really good pocket camera, but it does not "WOW" me. The Sony NEX 5N does.For 250 and under, The Canon Powershot S100 REALLY good. If you want something almost as good and even MORE pocketable, I suggest the ELPH. Keep in mind though that if you want decent video included, the ELPH is not going to cut it.I hope this helps. Finding the "right" camera for the price is REALLY tough. I sympathize with you. ;)
Плазмонавт-2WCPY
25.02.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I recently purchased a Canon S100 compact camera to carry with me on birding outings. My usually birding rig is a Canon SLR (50D, 7D...) and a 500mm f/4L IS USM and 1.4x teleconverter. Since this setup is rather large and heavy I have been trying to find a good solution to photograph non-bird subjects such as landscapes/scenery/habitats, people, buildings and whatever else I encounter that a 500mm lens isn't good for capturing.I started off by purchasing an EF-s 10-22mm lens for this but I found that while I really liked the wide angle capabilities of this lens I really wanted more focal length than this lens offered so eventually purchased an EF-s 15-85mm IS lens. This lens was still wide enough to do most of the photography I wanted to do and offered me the extra focal length that I wanted. Both of these lenses are in my opinion excellent. However, after using them for a few years I found that I am still missing tons of photos that I would have liked to have taken because either of these lenses is still more than I want to carry around when I am out birding.After searching the various options I eventually purchased a used Canon S90 compact. I liked the idea that it could be used manually, it had reasonably good image quality, and most of all that it was small enough to fit in my pocket so I could carry it with me everywhere.What I wasn't so thrilled about with the S90 was that operation was a bit sluggish (compared to the SLR I was used to), the lens could only go as wide as a 28mm field of view and that the image quality wasn't quite up to what I really wanted. I know that it isn't reasonable to expect SLR image quality in a small compact camera but I am trying to find a compromise I am happy with and the S90 wasn't quite there.One issue that I wasn't expecting with the S90 was that as I carried the camera around in my pocket the rear LCD screen got quite scratched up and more importantly lots of dust accumulated inside of the camera. The dust eventually started affecting the image quality and I was never able to completely clean it out despite taking the camera apart and cleaning the sensor and as much of the inside of the lens as I could reasonably get to.When the Canon S100 was announced I was excited to see that the focal length range had been expended to 24mm equivalent at the wide end and GPS had been added. Before I purchased the S100 I had been carrying around a GPS logger in my pocket and the GPS feature on the S100 might be able to eliminate one more thing that I had to carry around with me and charge each night.I waited a while to see what the reviews were like and was very disappointed by early reports of decreased image quality (compared to the S90/S95) and issues with the lens. Despite the initial reports my curiosity got the best of me and I ordered the S100. It arrived just in time to take on a birding trip to California, which I just concluded. So the following are my reactions of 10 days of using the S100 in the field and post processing my images.At the start of the trip I turned on the GPS function but kept the GPS logger function turned off. Each time I took the camera out to take a photo it took a long time for the camera to lock onto the GPS signal. Even when standing outside in plain view of a clear blue sky it would sometimes take more than 10 minutes. I read the manual to try to figure out if I was doing something wrong and tried the measures listed there but none seemed to help. It wasn't long before I figured out that to really get any practical use out of the GPS function the logger function must be on. The advantage was that the camera will almost instantly lock onto the signal recording GPS data in the photos but leaving the GPS function on all day long seriously drains the battery. I am still not sure if the GPS function on the S100 will replace my GPS logger or not but I think that it might.A pleasant surprise that I noticed as soon as I started using the new camera is that operation feels substantially faster than it did with the S90. Focus seems more reliable and pretty much all of the functions on the camera feel more responsive. I am very pleased with the overall functionality of the S100.To avoid the dust and LCD damage that I had with the S90 I am carrying the S100 in a thin pouch that seems to be doing a good job protecting the screen and keeping dust away.The auto-focus on the S100 does seem to be a substantial improvement over the S90. With the S90 I would often have trouble getting the focus to lock when doing wide-angle landscape shots. With the S100 this rarely happens but it still does happen from time to time.On the image quality front I am not really sure what to think yet. The weather conditions weren't great for landscape photography for much of my trip but I think the image quality does seem to be pretty close to that of the old S90. In other words not bad but not great either. I think it will be acceptable for my needs (mostly web viewing and small prin
Плазмонавт-3AHTQ
03.01.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I have been seeking an affordable camera which will give high quality photos and video clips for both home and work purposes. During the past week, I have closely compared the S100 to the S95 by taking a series of approximately sixty photos and five videos at various locations using the same shooting conditions whenever possible for both cameras. Afterwards, the photos and videos were compared on a 27-inch monitor. Here are a few of my observations. Both cameras gave excellent outdoor photos during a clear, sunny day. However, on my large monitor, the S100 gave comparably excellent indoor photos in either auto or P mode even when zoomed while the S95 showed more overall graininess particularly when zoomed or in low light. Although the photo image quality for both cameras was excellent, the video image quality was different. Out of fairness, it is important to note that the S100 will shoot 1080p HD video whereas the S95 is only capable of shooting 720p HD video. Thus, it is not surprising that the S100's HD video image quality was improved compared to the S95's. However, in addition, the S100 gave smoother video playback with good autofocus even when zooming. More astonishing was the ability of the S100 to give excellent video quality under a wide range of indoor lighting conditions while the S95 gave bright purple lines on both the LCD and in video playback when it was near various types of long-life incandescent light bulbs. The bright purple lines were reproducible, observed near three light bulbs in my house, and made some of the S95 video clips completely unusable. (I do not know if my copy of the S95 was defective.) Since I will use my new camera for work-related photos and videos, too, the purple lines on the S95 were unacceptable to me. The battery life of the S100 seemed poor during the first charge/discharge cycle. I did try the GPS, and while it worked, it drained the battery more quickly than expected. With neither the GPS nor its logger on, the battery life is more tolerable now that I am past the first couple of charge/discharge cycles, but I plan to have a spare battery with me at all times when I use the S100. Based on all of my tests, the features of the S100 are excellent for its size. The photo images seemed to have greater clarity on my big monitor than those from the S95, and the S100's video quality is much improved over the S95. My only complaint is that the S100 is a power hungry little camera, and I think that Canon's design engineers should consider a longer-lasting battery even if it makes the camera a little larger. I am now a very happy S100 owner, and I am glad that I took the time to do my photo and video tests. The battery issue is the only reason I gave the S100 four stars instead of five. It is worth noting that owners of both the S95 and S100 will benefit from learning to use the different shooting modes as well as knowing about options available in the recording and function menus. In addition to Canon's User Manual, there are a couple of excellent books specific to using the S95 that are also helpful for learning how to get the best quality photos and videos from the S100. Search "S95" at any bookstore to find them. One of these books has recently been updated for the S100: "Photographer's Guide to the Canon PowerShot S100" by A.S. White.Update: Since several reviewers have observed S100 photos that were entirely out of focus or had edges that were out focus, I reexamined selected photos for the S95 and S100. For this examination, my 27-inch monitor was set at a screen resolution of 2560 x 1440, which is the highest available setting. In addition, I zoomed in on the photos so that only 8.3% (1/12th) of an overall photo filled the screen. For each photo, all four edges were carefully examined for clarity and compared to the center. The photos selected for examination had considerable detail in them. Some had pine needles, tree branches, bridge trestles, and buildings near the edges. Others had wallpaper designs, signs, and posters with words printed on them. (No low light or zoomed photos were selected.) With only 8.3% of the photos filling the entire screen of my 27-inch monitor, the images on my copy of the S100 were uniform in clarity all the way out to the edges and corners. For the selected photos, the images on my copy of the S95 were similarly uniform in clarity everywhere except for the lower right corner. Surprisingly, the lower right corner was consistently blurry in multiple photos. It is worth noting that with only 8.3% of the photos filling the entire screen, both cameras gave slightly fuzzy images, but when entire photos were visible, each camera gave sharp, clear images. Some reviewers have complained about the LCD screen, too. When I was comparing the S95 to the S100, I did note that the LCD image on the S95 was more pleasing than the image on the S100. While I was considering this, I got out my old Canon PowerShot SD550 and compared the ima
Сатурниан-9YEMR
22.12.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
1/11/13 Update: The class 10 card dramatically improved perfromance. I'm not sure why it required such a fast card to offer what I consider normal speed but it worked. As soon as I'm finished snapping one picture it's ready for another instantly. There is no longer a momentary delay while it rights. Of course, there's always the possibility that the first card might be bad, so I'm going to format it and try it in another camera to be sure. It was a brand new card and that was the first camera I used it in. My second comment is regarding the price. My original review was based on the price at the time. It was well after Black Friday but still around the holidays when I purchased mine. Now that the camera has been officially discontinued, prices have skyrocketed, by at least $100 most places (where you can still find it). That severly dampens my opinion of the value now because you can get the S110 for basically the same price. So, if you didn't snatch one of these up during the inventory dump, I'd suggest looking at the S110 instead. However, if by chance you can find an S100 for the price I mentioned earlier, then by all means, it's a no-brainer. Buy it!Original Review---------------I bought one the other day because I've always wanted one but just couldn't justify dropping $400 for it. At $250 it's definitely a good buy for what you get. Fast f2.0 lens, large clear and bright LCD, manual controls, RAW capability and full 1080P HD recording to name a few items you get for the price. Build quality is nice and solid. The body makes me think of a miniature G12. It is a bit larger than I expected. It replaced a Canon SD880-IS (which also gave me several years of beautiful photos) and I thought the S100 would be smaller than the SD880 but it's slightly larger. The controls are well laid out and navigating through features is very easy. Picture quality so far has been very good under a variety of shooting conditions. Daylight outdoor, indoor under tungsten and natural lighting, and even some candle light shots all came out well. The image quality isn't going to make me forget I own a DSLR but is definitely very good nonetheless. It has decent low-light and high-ISO performance but a downside is a softness and tendency to frequently over-expose in full auto. It can be easily compensated for in manual but if you're a set and forget type, this may not be the best choice for a primary camera. However, for me personally, I feel comfortable taking this as my primary camera anywhere a zoom is not needed. It's a perfect vacation cam due to the size and versatility. I have a couple other minor complaints in addition to the indoor exposure. One is lag. I have a class 6 card currently inserted and see a little lag between shots. I'm going to swap it with a class 10 card but that shouldn't necessary with this type camera and the type shooting I'm doing (basically all snapshots). Another complaint is the flash. The position of it, top left, forces me to hold the camera in an awkward manner to avoid obstructing the flash when it pops up automatically. It's a motorized flash, so obstructing it also raises the fear of possibly breaking it one day. Other than these minor issues, I love this camera for its intended purpose, my primary go-to camera when I'm looking to travel light but want top notch quality and versatility. At a price under $250, there is no way I couldn't recommend it. I compared it to the S110 before purchasing and realized there isn't a ton of difference, especially considering they both use the same processor and are virtually identical spec-wise except a few areas that really don't convince me that the S110 is worth the extra cash. I can live without a touch screen and built-in wifi.
Капеллан-4FCLN
04.11.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I owned five Powershot S Series (s30,s50,s60,s80,s90) cameras prior to purchasing the s100. I took close to 100,000 photos with my s90 in the two years that I owned it. I am a semi-professional photographer that owns multiple Canon EOS DSLR cameras with L lenses.First off, I don't think it's fair to compare the s100 to DSLRs, APS-C, Four Thirds cameras. These large sensor cameras are in another class and even my really old Canon 10D with 6MPs will at low ISO have better image quality than the s100. If you don't mind a larger camera that is not pocketable and are willing to spend more, the s100 is not the best camera for you. For example, the Sony NEX-5N will give superior results to the s100 in nearly all situations.The s90, s95 and now s100 are all unique in that the are truly pocketable--all the competitors are too large for pant pockets (Panasonic LX5, Olympus XZ-1, FujiFilm X10). Some of these cameras are quite good and all of them provide faster lenses across the zoom range (the s100's size precludes a faster zoom lens). But none of these competitors are comfortably pocketable--this means that the s100 has practically no competition for it's size as a truely pocketable semi-pro camera.If you don't need the manual control, the Canon 300HS will also take great pictures for less than half the price in a smaller/slimmer camera body. The s100 does have a great AUTO mode and multiple Scene modes which in most situations does an excellent job. But shooting both the s100 and 300HS in AUTO will lead to very similar results. The s100 differentiates itself by providing excellent manual control and the ability to shoot RAW images.Now if you are someone that wants pant pocketable camera with excellent manual controls and image quality, the s100 is very hard to beat. I take ten times more shots with my s100 than my DSLRs because I ALWAYS have it with me.If you already have a s90 or s95, there is little need to upgrade to the s100 immediately. The s100 has some worthy upgrades (24mm, GPS, better designed body) but the image quality is near identical to the s95/s90. My s90 took many falls and goo in an airplane pocket killed the flash otherwise i'd stay with the s90. I have now taken close to 1500 photos with the s100 and here are my experiences of it's pros and cons:PROS:* The s100 is cleaner at high ISO (eg 1600 and above) but the difference isn't as substantial as Canon claims (for low ISO, there is no difference in noise)* s100 is even slimmer than the s95 which is was already quite pocketable* GPS is a great addition and quite accurate most of the time* rough texture finish makes the camera easier to hold and also looks great* rubber grips make camera easier to hold but don't expect miracles* mirror like shutter button is easier to find especially given the removal of the func button from the top of the camera* back wheel now has the perfect resistance and feedback* the delete button is not on the dial so I can finally delete while viewing a zoomed in on an image!!!* lens zooms very quickly (sometimes too quickly to get accurate zoom)* fast shutter speed (in fact in Continuous drive mode it is very difficult to take one photo--always get two photos and I am fairly fast releasing the shutter button--an additional slower Continuous mode option would have been helpful)* 8 shots in a second is a handy feature to have though not often used (limited to 8 shots and then have to wait for the photos to be written to the card)* 24mm wide-angle is very useful for indoor photography* lens is sharper across zoom range than the s90--with sharper corners (people have reported variation in the sharpness of the lens on early models)* ability to control max ISO and ISO selection criteria for Auto ISO* dynamic range correction works well* dedicated movie recording button* 1080p video recording (much better resolution but not as good low light capture than s90&s95 but can't match Sony HX-9V)* can zoom while recording video with minimal noiseCONS:* all Canons Point&Shoots have slower focus especially in the dark. The s100 is comparable or slightly slower than the s90. Fuji and Sony have made strides to provide faster focus and I hope Canon follows. Set shortcut button to Focus-lock to pre-focus--once focus is locked the s100 is really fast* NIGHT PHOTOGRAPHERS: a major con for me is that the s100 is locked to ISO80 for shutter speeds over 1sec. May not matter to most people but I loved shooting 15sec ISO400 shots with my s90* The display does not brighten as much in a dark room making composition more difficult. The s90 shows a very grainy but bright image in a near dark room where the s100's display is very dark (also if multiple shots are taken with the shutter button half pressed the display is darker for the subsequent shots)* The s100 is better in high-ISO short shutter speed situations but the s90 is better for long shutter speed photography* Auto mode is limited to 1/8 (have to switch to P mode if you don't
Гиперион-9NYGZ
23.12.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
A review from an amateur photo-taker - NOT your professional photographer with all the technical jargon! :PI am so happy this camera is here! Long awaited and it was a heavy debate between this and the recently reduced-priced S95. Chose the S100 since it's just the upgraded version with some improvements and enhancements. I think the S95 is still a great option. From what I hear the professional DSLR camera users love to at least have this camera around when they don't have access to their SLRs! Now I also have an SLR - and it is just BIG and not portable - so this is a much better option for me to acquire the high quality pictures I want but with an easier and better ability to control certain aspects (with the two different wheels) without having to lug that big SLR around.First thing - Thank you, Amazon, for the better pricing! At $429, it beats the other vendors selling it for $479+S/H. And after a delay in shipping due to delay in manufacturing, it arrived before Christmas! Not a gift, but I'll be excited to use it for family Christmas pictures and play around with it :)Now here's something to note - it doesn't come with a memory card! I did not pay attention to these details when purchasing. It's been a year since I've gotten a camera so I can't remember if this is the norm...I sort of always remembered cameras coming with a minuscule-sized memory card...but it didn't. So alas, now I have to wait a couple of days of a new one. I could just take a memory card out of my DSLR or from my previous point-and-shoot camera, but it has to be reformatted to this camera. I don't know exactly what that entails, but I figured I'd just wait for the new one to go in the new camera, reformat it, and then all my cameras will still have a memory card. Don't be careless like me - order a memory card when you order the camera!So on a side note: Just ordered an 8GB transcend SD class 10 memory card from Amazon...Recently did rapid and minimal research on the different "classes" of memory cards, and since I had read a few reviews talking about slightly slower than ideal performance of this camera, I thought it might just be better to maximize with a class 10 (higher processing/writing speeds.) I don't really know if that helps, but I figure it can't hurt. This is never something I had ever thought about with previous cameras. This camera accepts SD, SDHC, and SDXC.Now if you've read other reviews - you know the battery-life is not ideal (so consider buying a separate battery pack for those big special events or vacation days). The manual says you can get ~200 shots on the battery life, and that a 4GB memory card can save about 1231 shots. So choose your memory card accordingly.As a right-handed user, it's hard to get the wrist strap through the little hole. (There is another one on the upper left hand corner for left-handed people I assume) I had to use some floss with a floss threader so finally slide it through! Not a big deal and only a one-time thing once you get the strap through.This little pop up flash is frustrating and an INSANELY DUMB feature in my opinion. It's right where your left hand may naturally hold the camera, so I feel like it's bad if it's constantly a little jarred by the unknowning person who is taking a picture for you.LED screen is big and beautiful, crisp and clear! Love it.Have been playing around with the different settings and it's great - much easier to control different settings with this camera than regular point and shoot. My intention was to learn more about photography basics with this camera and it's so much easier than your traditional point-and-shoot camera to adjust settings due to the front dial.Just after a few weeks of using this...I do think that (At least on Auto setting) - I have mostly liked my outdoor photos from my Canon SD 850IS point and shoot better, but I think the trick is using this camera on the Aperture, Shutter, or Manual modes with increased ability to change the settings with ease.As for my photo qualities - I think they are turning out excellent. Definitely an upgrade from my previous point-and-shoot - and considering I am not a photographer, these end-result of my photos are very comparable to what I can take with my DSLR. (I am sure a professional photographer would find that they can get their better end-result with an SLR than this point-and-shoot - but I do not have that same expertise!)Also...manual comes on a disk instead of a thick printed booklet along with some Canon photo software.Excited to have more fun with this camera! :)
Астероид-6AENT
03.07.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I really like the look of this case, giving an otherwise plain-looking s100 camera a touch of class.The case comes in two pieces. One is the actual cover which comes off with three snaps at the bottom of the case. The other is attached to the camera through the tripod mount, yes it screws right into where the tripod would normally go. Not to worry, tripod users, there is still a tripod mount on the bottom.Again, this looks great. And the half that stays on the camera while you use it functions superbly as a grip and, i would imagine, as some protection if you happen to drop your camera.The material is soft yet durable, and smells like leather, so I assume that's what it is. The inside is a suede leather like material (again, could be leather, smells like it)The color looks a bit dark in the pictures, almost black. But this is very much a dark brown. I have my cover on the silver s100, and it looks marvelous.Likes:-it looks great. in a word, classy.-easy to remove and re-attach cover, just 3 snaps-provides protection even when the cover is off-doesn't block the microphones as other review said here (not on s100, anyway)-allows full use of all controlsDislikes:-The bottom is not flat. There are three snaps and a large off center (lined up under the lens)tripod mount screw/nut. Not a big deal for point and shoot, or tripod use, but it's difficult for self portraits where you just want to set it on a flat surface, as it won't remain level without help.-the included strap. I found it to be a bit short, and narrow. I don't use it. I have an old lanyard strap that I hooked onto one of the loops and hang it from my neck, or wrap it around my wrist when shooting.-poor ring function. The bottom of the front cutout where the lens fits touches the lens ring, making it difficult to turn due to friction. It will turn, but requires some effort. Eventually, the leather wears a bit and allows free movement of the ring. You can also bend the leather around the lens to give it some clearance.-poor ring function 2. So after getting over the difficult to turn ring, since this is a leather case with some thickness to it, the ring is recessed a bit, making it difficult to grab on to to turn it the way you might normally hold it with thumb on bottom and index or middle finger on top. My smaller fingers don't have a problem, but larger fingers might have trouble grabbing on to the bottom enough to turn the ring. You might find yourself having to cup the lens from the front and using 3 or 4 fingers to turn the ring more easily.-No memory card, ports, or battery access without unscrewing the bottom half from the camera. Not really a big deal to remove and do a quick battery change (Something that is necessary many times, with the relatively poor battery life on the s100 when you use gps), but it is more involved than would be with a regular slip case where you would just slip the camera out of the case, open the battery compartment, and swap. Just 1 extra step. Same goes for the ports.Conclusion:I like it, and would recommend this case for its protective and aesthetic qualities alone. The ring function problem can be overcome with practice, but it's really not a big deal for me, because I do not use the ring too often. When I do, I generally have time to fiddle with it and get it to turn. I also don't mind removing it from the bottom half when i need to changed or charge batteries or transfer pictures, as this is something I usually do at the end of the day in the comfort of my home or hotel room.Concerns:The snaps for the cover are on little flaps that are single stitched onto the cover. I don't anticipate the stitching to wear poorly or come undone under normal use, but it is a concern, if I were to be a bit rougher or more rushed in removing the cover.
Пандорец-9MBII
27.01.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I purchased this product as I had owned a Canon Powershot s100 for several months but did not have a case for it. I was having trouble deciding what case to get and kept putting the decision off. Amazon suggested this case and when I saw it was only $5 for a leather case thought I might as well get it. Even if it is not very good, at $5 who cares. When the product was delivered, I was pleasantly surprised by the quality. The only reason I did not rate it a 5/5 is the case, althought relatively easy to open, does make operation of the camera a little awkward. The case impeads the operation of some controls (especially the 4 way multipurpose dial on the rear when wanting to use the right hand side of the dial e.g used for selecting flash options). The case effectively is in two pieces. One piece screws into the tripod mount of the camera and anchors the camera to the case. The second piece wraps over the camera and both ends attach to the underside of the first piece by means of press studs. When these press studs are undone (either to open from the front or the rear of the camera), this second piece is relatively large and "flaps" about a bit and can get in the way.The case comes with a long strap attached, which enables it to be placed over the shoulder or around the neck for carrying, or it can be carried in the hand. It also does not make the camera significantly bulkier, so it can also be placed in a pocket. The only improvement I would recommend here is for provision to be made to enable the case to be attached to a belt, which some other cases do.However, overall, this is a good quality case that I purchased mainly to protect the camera when not in use and when being carried around. It serves this purpose well. Although it can interfer with ease of handling the camera when in use, it is not very time consuming or difficult to remove the camera from the case. I have only had this case for about a month, so cannot say how durable it is, but it is holding up well so far.For me, it serves the purpose that I purchased it for (to protect the camera) at a very reasonable price (I paid $5 for it), so I feel it is great value for money. The only people I would not recommend it to are those who are frequently pulling out the camera for a couple of shots here and there. They would likely find it irritating. If taking several shots at a time, I am happy to remove the camera from this case, as it is fairly quick and easy to do so, and then re-attach to the case when finished until the next time I want to use the camera. If only taking 1 or 2 shots, I leave it in the case and put up with the slightly awkward handling. For $5 and keeping the camera protected, I can put up with a little inconvenience.Note that I am in Australia and purchased the camera in Australia. I assume the controls and functions are in the same location for all Powershot s100's.
Небулоид-4YQZS
10.02.2013
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I have had this camera for a year and a half. I wanted to have a pocket-size all-purpose camera for shooting kids and to use while skiing. I am a photographer and always like to have a camera with me. Cell phones are useful but in general won't do if you want good quality and to make larger prints. This camera takes great shots. It focuses fast and accurately and handles most scenes quite well.I use the program or scene modes frequently and find that I only use manual mode rarely. The images from this camera will not hold up to close inspection with larger sensor cameras but will give you good shots in most situations. Color saturation and dynamic range as well as detail will not be as good as C size or full frame sensors. That doesn't mean that you won't get acceptable pictures depending on your purpose.The problems that I've had with this camera have been significant to me. The first is that this battery cannot stand up to exposure to cold weather for even a brief period. You may get one or two Shots off when taking pictures on a mountain while skiing or even 15 seconds of video but no more. The red battery light comes on telling you that you need to change your battery and this even though the battery is fully charged. I returned my camera to Canon who told me nothing was wrong and that the camera was up to spec. This camera is not guaranteed to take pictures at temperatures below 32°. All my previous PowerShot cameras have been fine under the circumstances in fact I have never had a problem before. I Returned my camera a second time when this continued to happen this year and they change the motherboard. The camera is a little better but it's clear that the problem relates to this particular battery. The battery has been changed For the S110 which is back to the battery used in the S95. Interestingly my wife has the S95 and that is the camera that we used this season for our ski pictures without a problem.The camera makes beautiful videos in high definition of indoor sporting events with the only problem being again the battery not lasting that long. If you shoot in slow motion your images are also likely to be somewhat dark unless you are in a very bright arena.To Make a long story short, this is an excellent camera particularly at this price point. It gives beautiful pictures, beautiful videos and has state-of-the-art functionality for a point-and-shoot camera.If you plan on just going out and shooting a couple of snapshots, the battery will do fine. If you're going to use this to shoot events make sure you buy an extra battery. If you plan on using this outdoors in cold weather buy something else.ps. Canon Service was actually quite good. My problem was apparently more about design than malfunction. The service was fast and pleasant and I have no complaints with them.
Астероид-1ESIG
29.04.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
This printer is suitable for a small home office. It has a simple setup, fast text printing, and good network support with some nifty scanning options, but will take up a lot of space on the desktop and may have some issues with Windows XP machines. The printer comes with two standard size ink cartridges (XL versions are available for re-order), a USB cable, a phone cord, and a sample box of small photo paper. Because I already have a fax printer, I did not look at the fax features.Pro:It has good specifications for this price point. It prints around 8.5 on the new printer scale in black, and about 4 when printing black. It doesn't take a long time to print like some HP inkjets I have owned - the print starts and completes very rapidly. The document feeder will hold about 15 pages or so.The paper path is straight through, meaning that it is fairly simple to print on photo paper and Avery labels due to the a smooth paper path. The printer is designed such that the input and output trays are at very steep angles, so they don't take up as much room.The printer has a nice feature where one can press a single button and scan to a selected PC connected to the home network. The file then goes into a directory on the computer for later use. This feature works with the document feeder or the flatbed scanner, so one could easily scan in several pages. It is a great time saver because you don't have to "scan in" the document; it is "pushed" to the computer you select while you stay at the printer. Note here that for maximum scanning resolutions, the manual recommends using the flatbed rather than the feeder.The wireless setup was as described in the manual, and although it wasn't particularly detailed, the steps did work. But there wasn't a lot of explanation for the less experienced person, and the printer does not support the newer easy network setup options. I found it a lot easier to install on the Windows 7 machine, where one can simply add a printer via the built it menus; on XP one has to install the CD, which also downloads software at some points in the process. The network setup requires a USB connection to a computer; there are no setup menus to manually enter the network keys. But at least they include a cable.The device has the capability to scan to a thumb drive (or an external hard drive, I suppose), and the same USB port is used for PictBridge printing directly from a camera. The printer can connect to Bluetooth devices - but needs an optional Bluetooth module, so I could not test it.The printer does not use a power "brick", so the power cabling around the printer is clean.Con:There is no backlight for the LCD display, and I found it hard to read without shining some additional light. I did not expect the same display quality as an LED screen, for example, but the device needs some kind of backlight. Plan to keep a small flashlight handy, or be sure the area near the printer is well lit.There is only one color cartridge, rather than separate cartridges for each color. That means if one runs out of (for example) cyan, the entire cartridge has to be replaced. This kind of system is more expensive to keep in ink. I'm a bit surprised, because my last Canon MX offered support for individual cartridges. Therefore if you print a lot of color, this device may be more expensive than a machine that supports individual cartridges.This printer is very large compared to other printers I have owned, including another Canon MX series multifunction device. It is designed so that it is not too tall (maybe a foot or so high), but is about 30% deeper and a bit wider than other multifunction printers. Basically, it is designed wide, deep and flat, whereas many printers today are more vertical. Additionally, the only path for the paper is via the input tray - on the back of the machine, taking up another several inches of depth. Maybe this form factor is needed for some people; but in any case be aware and check the dimensions to be sure it suits your purposes.The scanner is a little bit slow, but acceptable for light use.There is only one input tray, and it holds only 30 pages. That isn't a lot of paper, and I would not recommend this printer for other than light home use unless one likes feeding paper to the machine.On my XP machine, I was unable to scan directly into Word 2000; the scan would preview but not actually scan. On my Windows 7 machine with the exact same version of software, I was able to scan directly.There is no SD or other card slot; one has to have a USB drive to print directly without a computer connection. Most printers have some kind of support for a memory card.Not really a true drawback, but several places in the owner's manual there are procedures for cleaning up the area around the print heads and interior. This is the first time I've seen such instructions, and it leads me to believe that the printer design may put some ink residue around the output area that may need to be cleaned up period
НоваГость-4MBDP
01.03.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
SETUP: with a USB cable was a breeze. Pop the CD in and follow the instructions. The instruction booklet was obviously written by someone whose first language is not English. Setting up the printer to work with my wireless hub was a nightmare. I finally figured out how to do it by going to the Canon web site and fishing around there for about half an hour to find the instructions. Once I had the instructions, it was very simple. The documentation could certainly be better written which would solve some problems others have mentioned with setup.SPEED: it prints about 8 pages per minute in black and white and half that in color. About average for a home printer, in my experience. The print is clear and crisp. Since I print, on average, one or two documents a week this is certainly acceptable for my use. Printing wirelessly from my laptop is just as fast as from the desktop (which is connected via USB cable). How far away from the printer can the laptop be? It's based on the coverage of your wireless router so anywhere you can use your laptop you can also use the printer.PROGRAM OPTIONS: The printer has a small keypad plus a one-line LCD readout where you select options on the printer. The selection is not available via your computer so you have to fiddle with this small keypad. The LCD screen is not back lit so you need to have good light in the room to see the readout. It certainly is not intuitive, so be sure to have the instruction book with you before you try to change any settings OR set up the WiFi. Fortunately, you only have to do this once unless you later decide to change some of the settings. For the price, I think this is also pretty standard.SD CARD SLOT: An odd thing is that there are no slots for memory cards. When you get to the WiFi models of most printers, my experience is they contain slots to print directly from a memory card. This is no problem to me, just interesting and I though I'd mention it in case that's a feature you need.INTERNET PRINTING: The printer does NOT work with Internet Explorer version 9.0. The "fix" from the Canon web site is "Downgrade to Explorer 8.0 or earlier" so that's what I did. They didn't even state that there will be an add-on later to make the printer compatible. Or you can simply switch to FireFox. (I didn't try any other browsers).COLOR QUALITY: is acceptable for an ink jet printer in this price range. If you're a professional photographer, then obviously you would have better equipment costing many times the amount of this printer.RELIABILITY: I have only had the printer a couple of days and it is working fine for now. It is noisy, but every printer I've had in this price range is noisy. I spent far more money on a HP printer about 5 years ago and had nothing but problems with it from day one, so I ditched it and am giving Canon a try.VALUE: The printer was $80 on Amazon (with free shipping) compared to $120 in the local "discount" store. Big win there. The old HP I purchased had the same functions and cost over $250. The ink cartridges supplied are the basic cartridges. Cannon claims to get 200 pages per cartridge, but reviews I've seen say it's more like 120 - 150 depending on what you are printing. There is also an XL version of the black cartridge available that increases output by about 60% and is the most economical. Ink is expensive no matter what brand of printer you purchase. The technology is in the cartridge now, and that's what makes it so much more expensive than ink was, say, 15 years ago. The color ink produces many less pages than the black, and I never print in color unless it's absolutely necessary.At this early stage in the game, I think that in spite of the WiFi setup hassle and finding out that I had to downgrade my web browser (my wife only uses IE) it seems I made a good choice with this printer. Time will tell.
Зета-Орион-2EYZF
26.12.2012
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
When Canon revived its PowerShot S range with the S90 in August 2009, it was in acknowledgement of a clear demand from enthusiast photographers for high quality yet pocketable cameras offering extensive manual control. The S95, which followed almost exactly a year later, stuck with much the same formula - a relatively large sensor (at least in compact camera terms), a 28-105mm equivalent zoom lens with a fast F2 maximum aperture at wideangle, and a multi-functional control dial around the lens. But while its successor, the S100, looks much the same again on the outside, it is to all intents and purposes a brand new camera.Crucially, the S100's three key imaging elements are all entirely new. The lens range has been extended wider and longer, to a 24-120mm equivalent 5x zoom; it retains the fast F2 maximum aperture at wideangle but is limited to a rather less-impressive F5.9 at telephoto (an inevitable consequence of the camera's compact dimensions). Secondly the S100 debuts Canon's latest DIGIC 5 image processor, which the company says is six times faster than the previous version, allowing more sophisticated image processing and noise reduction. But perhaps most significantly, the S100's image sensor is a Canon-made 12.1 MP 'high sensitivity' CMOS sensor in the 1/1.7" format (approx 7.5 x 5.5mm); only the second home-grown sensor the company has used in a compact camera after the PowerShot SX1 IS of 2008.Canon says the new sensor employs technology similar to that used in its EOS SLRs, including an on-chip noise cancellation system, and microlenses which cover more of the sensor area to improve its light-gathering characteristics. The company claims that this results in reduced noise and increased dynamic range; the maximum available ISO has accordingly been increased to 6400. A 4-channel readout system also improves the continuous shooting rate, up to 2.3 fps compared to the S95's maximum framerate of 1.9 fps. For real speed freaks there's also a scene mode that can capture 8 frames at an impressive 9.6 fps, but it's limited to JPEG images only, with no manual control.Compared to PowerShot S95 - key differencesThe S100 is in effect a whole new camera compared to the S95; almost every key feature has been upgraded or updated: 24-120mm (equivalent) lens range, F2.0-5.9, built-in neutral density filter 12.1 MP 1/1.7" Canon CMOS sensor DIGIC 5 image processor ISO 80-6400 2.3 fps continuous shooting (9.6 fps for 8 frames in High-Speed burst mode) Full HD (1080p24) movie recording; H.264 compression, MOV format Optical zoom in movie mode Super slow motion movie recording (640 x 480 @ 120fps, 320 x 240 @ 240 fps) Direct movie record button Built-in GPS unit with image tagging and logger functions
Кронос-5SWAJ
31.08.2012
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
The good is that it's a well built camera that takes sharp pictures and has a great feature set for its size. I considered the Sony RX100 and this camera, the newest pocket cameras with larger image sensors. I chose the s100 since:-RX100 didn't really have a long term track record as it was only recently released.-Smaller size and weight of the S100, excellent image quality given its size.-Much lower cost of the S100-Lens error due to heat/humidity had been fixed in later production batches according to a recall bulletin by Canon; the camera's serial number began with 46 and was not a part of the recall-Other than the above lens error issue the camera had a good reliability record from several forumsThe bad is that I got the lens error where the lens gets stuck in the out position and fails to retract after extending and retracting while on vacation in Japan. I'd taken a few pictures here and there, put it back in my camera bag or pocket, repeat several times for an hour or two. After a dozen tries, the lens finally retracted but then failed to extend.Luckily, there was a Canon service center less than 20 minutes away from my hotel by foot and subway. Long story short, since I didn't have my warranty card or proof of purchase with me on my trip other than from my Amazon account which I offered to bring up given Wifi access, they "offered" to repair it for just under 11,000 yen. After pointing out that I'd be returning home to the United States before the repair completion date, they responded that I could either come back and pick it up or I could arrange to have it delivered to me (what I understand is a polite way of saying owner pays delivery cost). So let me get this straight, a camera designed and built in Japan that I bought less than a month ago fails in Japan under normal use and I would have to pay to get it repaired? I would have purchased a new camera at a local electronics store, except that all the labels/menus were in Japanese and the only one I could figure out how to use at the store was a Canon S100.After a few days of occasionally turning the camera on and off, the camera suddenly started working again for whatever reason and the lens extended. Unfortunately that particular time was while sitting in a stairwell while holding it wrong and the camera slipped from my hands and tumbled down a flight of concrete and steel stairs with the lens extended. Other than scratches and dents on the body and the lens barrel, the camera took great quality shots and worked as good as new the rest of the trip.Summing up the bad experiences with the camera:-Lens error apparently not fixed-Bad service experience overseas-Should have bought an extra battery for the trip, video and GPS seem to suck up a considerable amount of battery life-HDR mode useless without a tripodI knew the technical limitations of this camera and also that batches with the lens error fix did not have an extended track record and went with this camera anyways. I took a bet on this camera and lost (at least a few days). In any case this camera is now working fine as far as I can tell.
ТерраБот-5LYPF
10.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Last October I started looking for a new point and shoot. My old camera was a Canon A620. Its about 6 years old and been a great first digital camera for a beginner. I was thinking this time getting something nice a little more top of line. So I spent a lot of time reading and watching reviews. The RX100 had only been out a few months. All I heard were rave reviews about. So I bought my first $650 camera. When it came in I was kind of impressed. It was really high quality and small. So small and expensive I noticed my fingers hurting from holding it so tight. While trying to learn all of its functions. The first day after handling the RX100 I did not like it. Because it was so uncomfortable to hold for me. The edges were not rounded like most cameras. It had more of a square sharp edge. But after a while I got use to holding it and it became a little more comfortable.I ended up returning the RX100 in less than a month of owning it. Do to it draining the battery for no reason when not in use. 2 times while owning the camera it drained a full charged battery.I am just a novice when it comes to cameras. But honestly I felt my old A620 took better pics for me than the RX100. Which makes no since to me. I am glad I got rid of RX100.The Canon S100 right out of the box. I liked it a lot more than I did the RX100. It is so much more comfortable to hold with its nice round edges. I love this camera. I never felt that way about the RX100. Also I bought the S100 for 1/3 of the price of the RX100. Saved so much I bought the 2 year square insurance with it.Pros: super comfortable, shoots amazing pics.Cons: I see some say they don't like the S100 because it is plastic. But to me it seems like a super plastic. Kind of like a glock plastic. Seems tough to me. I would not call that a draw back. Only 2 cons I see so far. Recording video. There is a little a noise recorded when you use the zoom while recording. But not bad. And battery life could be problem.Recommendation if you buy the S100. Purchase a spare battery. They are cheap $13.Personal Con: I don't like the GPS. I know it can be turned off. But I don't trust there are not back doors into it. Just like cell phones were illegally spied on with out warrants. The gov said it was because 9/11 it started. But then we found out they had been listen to us since the 90's way before 9/11... Anyways my 2sents.So far lovin this camera...
Нейрон-7KHFN
24.11.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I am not a photographer of any skill level, so I was looking for a camera that is simple to use and that would take good quality photos that I would be able to load onto my computer and print or change according to what I wanted from the photo. This camera is convenient in many ways. It is easy to carry around because of its small size, height and width are very similar to an I-phone but thickness is a bit bigger, and the weight is negligible when it is in my pocket. I have the black matte finish and the texture, very similar to very fine grit sandpaper, makes it feel secure in my hand. There is no feeling of it slipping out of my hand. It is also very easy to use as both a camera and video recorder, and images from both settings come out looking very crisp and clean. Although if you move the camera around quickly in the video mode it will be blurry. The functions, at least the ones I use, are easy to understand just from fiddling with the camera and the others are clear after going through the manual or looking at a couple of videos on you tube.I have not used it for an extensive time period so I have not had any issues with the battery life, but I also do not use the GPS function and turn off most of the others. So if you are into using all the functions available you may want to look into purchasing a second battery.The one issue I do have with the camera is the same one that many people do too. It is the positioning of the flash. Imagine holding a camera, for most people the left index finger rests on the top/left portion of the camera and this is exactly where the flash pops up from. However, most of the cameras that I reviewed before purchasing this one seem to have the flash set up in exactly the same way. I have found that when you ask someone to take a photo of you, make sure the flash is open before you hand them the camera.Why by this camera for $300 when there are similar specs for about $100. I found this camera to be lighter than the $100 counterparts and the quality of photos, both on my computer and after they are developed, to be of a higher quality. My previous cameras were a Nikon and Sony, both bought around $120, took forever to shoot between pictures. I would push down the button and it would take about 6 seconds for the photo to take and then another 3 before I could take another picture. For me this was a big issue when I was taking pictures of my kids and nieces and nephews because I would miss the shot I wanted of them because it took so long for the cameras to actually capture the image( little kids move around ALOT!). Now I am not saying that Canon is necessarily better than the other brands, but I do think the price points do make a difference.
Аэронавт-8IGZU
25.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I normally do not write reviews but this camera keeps delighting me as I tested its multiple features. I was a bit concerned about the many issues people have encountered with the LENS ERROR but decided to take a chance in February, 2013 when the price dropped to $250. I received a camera in the 46XX for serial number with a 1.01 firmware version. I did an upgrade to the latest firmware 1.02 even without having any problems that the firmware is meant to fix. I noticed with the new firmware the Auto mode is much more responsive and produces better color and overall picture quality. I also prefer to use P or M modes to get much sharper pictures in general than those from the Auto setting which has the tendency to prefer high ISO thus adding noise to the IQ. However the main reason I bought this camera is to have more controls than a simple P&S and to be able to get more on the creative side of Photography. I believe this camera can produce comparable results to my Nikon 5100 DX in clear days outdoor. I have more experiences with Nikon and found most of the time the pictures from their cameras have the tendency to be "warmer" than those from Canon but with the S100 I can "enhance" the picture to look more "punchy" by cranking up Sharpness, Saturation, Contrast or RGB depending on the situation (this is really just personal taste and the Canon S100 does produce very accurate color by default but you need to play with it to find your best preferred combination - also note that Auto mode does not allow you to change Custom Color nor set E/V). I would have given this camera a 4.5 star if it is allowed since I don't believe it is perfect but for its class it deserves a good 5.0 star (compared to others I have tested that are much more expensive e.g Olympus zx-1, Panasonic LX7, Nikon P770Canon PowerShot S100 12.1 MP Digital Camera with 5x Wide-Angle Optical Image Stabilized Zoom (Black)0 etc..). I would highly recommend this camera as a permanent travel companion since it is the smallest pocket camera there is around capable of taking incredible images, even in low light. Canon seems to have finally tweaked this small gem to its best behavior but only time will tell if the dreaded "lens error" is still there.
Гелиос-5VZXQ
21.04.2012
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I had S95 and did some comparison.I wish I can said is a lot better, but reality is 2 steps forward and 1 step backward.2 step forward are the new cmos sensor and digi 5 help the camera achieve very good low light indoor image and video is capable of 1080p with auto focus and can zoom however is not with issues. Discuss that later. The camera start up is fast seem to be faster than s95. Focus shot to shot is also improvement but could had been better. In s95 i can't use iso more than 400 it cause too much noise, but with s100 i can use iso 1600 still pretty good, pcmag said s100 can use up to iso 2000. Which I can is probably true. Is best in class for the iso test. Video is excellent. Soem of the video in outdoor can match quality of those mirror less camera with their kit lens. S100 can beat mirror less camera in low light with their kit lens, is not fair comparison, but most people buy mirror less don't want to buy pancake since cost as much as this camera. The gps function is good but canon picture software doesn't do geotag automatic for you, just gave u the gps info is up to to use it, upload to site like flixr or picasa instead. S100 has better grip support than s95. the silver color of s100 really stand out better than black one, the battery in the s100 is made in japan, s95 battery is made in china.The issue with this camera is the shuttle lag freeze at some of the shots, usually during hot weather like 90 degree after you take like 50 shots in 30 minutes time frame, the camera will sometime freeze for few seconds before you can take another shots, is annoying i do not expect such issue with s95, the sensor or chip in s100 is hotter than s95, cause i do felt the camera is warmer after some use.Another annoying problem is the video focus usually during low light, u can easily hear the focus noise . Not too loud but is noticible, is the only p&s with this sensor has this problem, other camera has to be like m4/3 sensor or larger to hear such noise. the auto iso in long expose is limited to 80 only, not usefull. Typical auto iso only goes up to 1600. the HDR and night handle mode is useless without tripod. sony camera hdr can use it without tripod as well as night handle mode. How can canon call hand handle mode if you still need tripod. Also no panorama mode, canon is the only major camera brand doesn't offer that feature only assist you mode. You must buy spare battery for this camera, just get the after market one only like $15 or less, you might need 2-3 if you gonna shoot more than 400 photos without charging. Gps on does eat you battery and take 1 to 3 minute to find the position.Bottom nice this camera does 2 part very well better than other in the same class such image and video, but function and having some issue first of its kind in the class can be annoying and cause you to miss the shot so tradeoff is there. you need to had patient and good hand to use this camera3It seem after my long complain of this camera why I still gave 4 out 5, fact is still gave you such good image and video is hard to complain the 2 major factor what you need the camera, yes sony and Panasonic and other gave you far more feature, canon often gave you the least feature for the $ but usually best in image. Unless panasonic came out new lx with 1080p 60fps and smaller is hard to beat this camera. Wish many of issue will get fix in future patch.
Показаны отзывы 201-248 из 938.
Похожие товары с лучшей оценкой
Wizemart © 2026.
Рекомендательная система по умному выбору товаров по отзывам и рейтингам
