Отзывы о Мфу Canon Pixma G3410
921 отзывов пользователей o Canon Pixma G3410
Пользовались
Canon Pixma G3410?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Скроменый эксперт
12.12.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I have the S100, had the S95 and S90 before it and took magnificent images with both S90 and S95. I'm a professional photographer, have both a Canon 5D and 5D2 and many high end L lenses. I've had many Canon Elphs before the S series as well as various G series bodies.The S90 was a spectacular camera, the S95 improved on it and I was very much looking forward to this camera because of improvements with ergonomics and the extra 4mm in wide angle at 24mm. In fact, I find distortion on the edges of 24mm unacceptable and have zoomed to 28 for much of what I've done with this camera.I have not taken a sharp picture yet with this camera and I have plenty of experience with both this line of cameras and with photography in general. I don't know what's causing the blurriness, probably not the CMOS sensor, more likely the lens, but I agree with others giving this camera a less than wonderful review that the IQ in the S100 is not up to snuff. It may be a copy to copy issue, I don't know.Time will tell if this is a copy to copy issue (a few bad apples) or something affecting all copies of this camera. I do know that I'm not going to keep the copy I have, I'm returning it and have ordered (re-ordered) an S95 as they're quite inexpensive now at $229.If Canon comes out with a statement about this and explains that it was a few bad apples I'll re buy the camera in a second, it's exactly the camera I want and if the IQ is just as good as the S90 and S95 I'll be happy as the ergonomics have improved considerably.Update:I ordered a second copy of this camera from Amazon and the problems of the first are completely gone. I'm guessing it's a problem copy to copy with some lenses.I particularly like having a 24mm lens in this camera and the extra 4mm of wide are very meaningful for what I use this camera for (hiking, landscape images). It's macro mode allows closer focusing than the S95, it will shoot at higher ISO with less noise, or, another way to put that is at the same ISO it exhibits less noise than the S95. The ergonomics of the buttons and case have been improved considerably and I'm now quite happy with this camera. I was able to buy (re-buy) an S95 for $229 on Amazon when they were discounted heavily during the holidays and I'll keep that camera as a travel backup but I plan to use the S100 as my primary hiking and travel camera now, the images I'm getting from it are excellent.
Скроменый эксперт
31.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
And I ordered another one just like it because I loved it so much. But then I returned it because my photographer friend had me buy a Nikon Coolpix 510 locally off Craig's list for the same price. I love all the things I can do with the Nikon, but I miss carrying my camera in my pocket. I love the zoom I have on the Nikon and the ability to have control on the speed and light of how the photos are taken, but I miss carrying my camera in my pocket. So if you are an amateur photographer, this Canon PowerShot is great. My grand daughter has one and loves it, but now she takes photos with her iPhone. I love my Nikon, and I'm still learning how to carry it, but now I also carry a tripod, so what's a camera? This is one of those, I'm in a dilemma reviews! Even my photographer friend takes more photos with his iPhone (but he's also retired now) but on the other hand, he has his tripod and Nikon very handy. Photography is definitely a kind of drug!
Скроменый эксперт
13.11.2012
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I read a lot about this camera before buy it.I wanted a fast, point & shoot, small, wide angle, with good picture camera. I almost got it all.I want a point and shout. I don't want to know photography. I just need a camera to capture what my eyes like to see, and let the camera do the rest. I don't want to wast time to change settings! I have two kids to look after during my trips ;)Having said that, I'm not happy because three things:1 - unacceptable distortion on wide angle. People's faces will be deformed if they are captured close to the last third of the frame;2 - The same old Canon's problem: tendency to overexpose creating pictures brighter than the real life. I find it hard to believe that in this 2012 we don't have technology to do real time HDR (high dynamic range).3 - The auto white balance (WB) does not represent real life. I have to use P mode and create my own WB (wasting time).So, unfortunately this is not a "point & shot", because if you do so, the pictures you will get are different from the landscape you saw: the grass will be less vivid; the sky might by white, and so many other surprises.But can this camera take good pictures? Of course, but not in Auto Mode.So, far from a "point & shot".
Скроменый эксперт
13.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have had an S90 for years. my mom and I also split the cost of an S95 a few years back. I bought this one for my girlfriend since she wants to learn more about photography and her old camera was partially broken already and needed to be replaced - and the price was right since the S110 had just come out. Like its predecessors, it is a powerful, versatile camera on which one can learn the foundations of photography, as well as take some great photographs. the raw setting allows high end post processing, which I don't deal with yet, but I have taken the raw files to high end print labs and the results are great - far better than jpegs. the large aperture allows great low light photography, which is a huge plus. I look at it as a cheap dslr that fits in a pants pocket - doesn't take dslr quality pics, but you can take it places a dslr won't go since it is pocketsize. one day I'll be able to afford a dslr and lenses, etc. until then I'll continue to rock this family of cameras and love it.
Скроменый эксперт
10.01.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I got this to replace a Lexmark all in one I had which gave me a lot of problems over the years as far as the software was concerned.This one seems a lot more reliable and appears to function without all the glitches found in the Lexmark.I am using it with my Apple SNOW LEOPARD 10.6 and just set it up for my Windows 7 laptop as well. It works very well with both. I have it set up to be wired until I get a wireless modem and once I do that I will set it up to be hard-wired to Apple and wireless for laptop and hopefully it will work not too sure right now if I can do both.In addition to working without a lot of glitches or problems I have to compliment Canon for its customer service. How rare it is nowadays to call and without a lot of trouble actually talk to a real life honest to goodness human being. I got my question answered quickly and was really happy with the availability of customer service though they are not 24/7. They also have very quick turnaround time for email support. I find this customer service policy one of the top "Pro's" for this printer. I am soooo tired of the runaround I get with almost everything and I'm glad its not the case with this Canon, not that I have needed phone support except for once while I was getting used to it.The one "con" I have - its quite large, larger than I thought and planned for but I can live with it. I find the paper sheet feeder a little harder to get loaded but maybe that's because I can't see the actual loader tray guides without turning the printer around and because of its size I'd rather not do that. It is a pretty noisy printer as far as the functions such as grabbing a sheet into the printer but its just me so its not bothering anyone.It printing speed is pretty good overall.I'm not too familiar yet with the on-screen controls but they seem to work the few I have tried. I think as I become more familiar / knowledgeable it will be even better.This printer AND THE EXCELLENT CUSTOMER SERVICE have sold me on Canon and that's not an easy sell.It's reliable and any questions are easily answered, thankfully by a LIVE/NON-RECORDED Person - fantastic.I only gave it 4 stars because of the size - largest printer I've had but other than the size it would be 5 stars.
Скроменый эксперт
20.10.2012
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I've been a loyal Canon customer for years -- all of my printers over the past 15 years, and a couple of cameras, too. So when my last printer flaked out, I decided to go with another Canon. I originally picked this printer because of the Wi-Fi connectivity, and the fact that it included a scanner. Unfortunately, I feel like I can barely give this printer a passing grade. (And I'm writing this after having one for almost a year...)THE GOOD:- Set up was easy (even getting it onto the Wi-Fi)- Overall image quality is acceptable, and sometimes even pretty good.- Print operation is quiet, and pretty quick for an ink jet.THE BAD:- It goes through ink fast. Like **really** fast. The cartridges allege to be rated for approx. 400 pages each -- which I don't think is all that good to begin with -- but they they seem to run out around 250 pages.- ...which would be tolerable if the cartridges weren't so expensive.- ...and which is made worse by the fact that you have to perform some printer voodoo to get the printer to accept non-OEM ink cartridges. (This has been such a pain that I gave up on it entirely.)This printer has been such a train wreck that I'll be looking at other brands for my next printer. I may even dump this one before it breaks, it's that annoying.
Скроменый эксперт
25.03.2013
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I bought this as a replacement for another Canon. Sorry I did. The scanner is great. However, after 2 weeks of hard use through the automatic feeder, a line developed about 1.5" from the margin. It will not disappear no matter what I try. However, if I lay anything on the glass, it does a fabulous job.The downgrade really comes with the inability for this printer to use ink properly. The cartridges go way too fast - I mean, after 20 or so pages of regular print outs, the ink is gone. It's ridiculous. Even when I had one cartridge refilled at Costco, it only lasted for 5 pages. So, if you want a decent scanner, this will work. However, for a one-person household who rarely prints, this doesn't even fit the bill.
Скроменый эксперт
22.11.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
For anyone who does not think the S100 does not have much to offer over the S95 I have two words for you: "24 mm". I have used 28mm (field of view) equivalents for quite a while now and a recent experience with a 35mm equivalent camera reminded me why. It left me wondering how people get by with such constricted fields of view - hardly anything could fit in the frame. This 24mm wide angle has opened a whole 'nother point of view! Going from a 28mm POV to 24mm is as big a step as going from 35mm to 28mm.My retired Canon SD870IS is a marvelous little wonder that was my foray back into the world of fully automatic cameras. It has served extremely well and with almost enough adjustments to do everything required of it. It is now severely battered, has a huge grey splotch on the lcd screen (known problem) but still produces excellent results. I've always looked at the S95 and thought longingly, 'If only it had a 24mm like the Panasonic LX5.' Conversely I looked at the LX5 and thought, 'If only it had HDR and was as compact as the S95.' That way I could safely justify staying away from either. Well, with the S100 Canon called my bluff!From very limited use, impressions are as follows:This camera blows the 870IS out of the water in terms of responsiveness.Every time I power up and look into the screen it is like ,'Whoa, that is a dramatic view!' That's 24mm for you..In auto mode you will almost never run out of light for a decent flash-less shot.In video mode, the 870IS would blur out when zooming in on a subject. The S100 refreshingly retains autofocus.The various scene modes are fun to play with.Cons:My hunch is that the S100 does not produce quite as vivid results as the SD870 when left to its own devices. May need to play around with it more.I preferred to take pics on my SD870 at 3MP resolution. With the S100 its either 2MP or 6MP+The zooming action is super-fast, which is not such a great thing in video mode when you want a more gradual zoom.That Canon added a 24mm to this camera is insane. It is worth ten times the paltry increase in MSRP over the S95. C'mon people, you know how exponentially valuable a wider field of view is! This camera is a classic case of 'give them an inch, they want a mile.' Canon has done a such great job of stuffing everyone's wishes into this sock that they are left digging for excuses why it does not do more. Enjoy this beauty!
Скроменый эксперт
18.01.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
My old Canon S5 IS kicked the bucket, breaking my heart. I loved the zoom and the feel of that camera in my hands. After much research (bascially asking the camera geeks in my life for advice) I kept hearing about this one. The Canon S100. It's small. Like fits-in-your-pocket-with-no-worries small. But it's powerful. After sitting down with my camera guru friend, who showed me just a fraction of the ins and outs of this baby, I was suddenly excited. You can actually manage the strength of the flash. No more washed out ghost faces ... you can take pictures where they look like PEOPLE. And low light is a breeze, making natural looking photos with no blur. The only disappointment is the zoom, which as my friend said, use your feet and walk forward. :) I couldn't afford a mega camera with super zoom to replace my old one, but this is seriously all I need for pictures of the people I love in my life. I highly recommend it.
Скроменый эксперт
28.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have owned lots of cameras in my life including dozens of digital cameras. If I had to have one camera only, I would probably choose the S100. I usually have a pocket point and shoot with me most of the time, and this replaced a Canon SD780 that I have used for almost 4 years. The S100 is a little bigger but it does so much more. The last small camera I owned with optional manual controls was the Canon S80 and it was 3 time thicker and not very pocketable. This camera has more features than most people would use or even know how to use, therefore it's not a good choice if you are just going to point and shoot for the Kodak moment shots. The extra range of the optical zoom is well appreciated also. Low level light is less of a problem because of the higher ISO range. So, if you want to spend this much on a small camera and you will use the extra features, this is the camera to have.
Скроменый эксперт
15.02.2013
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I love the flexibility of this "semi-professional" camera. Night shots are great as is quality. Beware that early models have a defect that in high heat and/or humidity, a piece breaks and you can't close the lens. Canon fixes this defect free of charge. Unfortunately this happened when I was in Panama for the first time but at least I had a backup camera.My biggest complaint is the autofocus. I have returned it to Canon twice and they say that all S100's are made this way. In video mode, the sound of the autofocus as it moves back and forth comes out on the audio track of the video and at times you can not hear what you are trying to record. I have the SX-210IS which is similar but the noise level is much lower, almost unnoticeable. There are other Canon's that don't have ANY noise from the autofocus in video format.
Скроменый эксперт
27.11.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I got this camera for a pretty good deal, and it's just as I expected: very light (super light), Great specs, and fairly easy to use. I'm not a super-heavy camera geek, but I'm wanting to learn and this camera is friendly enough to start.The major downside is that it does NOT come with an SD card. It does take the following, however, so if you are to purchase this, you should buy it with an SD card if you don't have one already:SD memory cardsSDHC memory cardsSDXC memory cards (must have at least windows 7, or upgraded XP)Eye-Fi cards (although this is not guaranteed.)I'm pretty happy with this right now--I am going to purchase a case, SD cards (SDXC), and another battery (I heard this one drained pretty fast--doesn't last a full day of heavy shooting).Otherwise, I can comment on the texturized grip on the camera, which I like. It's definitely a compact and light camera. The "getting started" manual isn't for beginners--there isn't going to be much on ISO's or shooting tips. These are expected knowledge, so be aware.That said, this seems like a handy camera. Can't wait to give it a whirl.
Скроменый эксперт
29.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I've had the s95 for over 2-1/2 years, and finally wore it out (after dropping it and abusing it, keeping it in my purse or pocket on a daily basis; I've taken it on dozens of trips- even international, and taken over 10,000 pictures with it). When I realized it was dying, I started looking into the newer model. I decided to try the s100 because it was cheaper yet still got excellent reviews. I am SO glad I did- it does everything that my beloved s95 did, plus some improvements! I love the HD video, the fact that they fixed the dial on the back so that you cannot accidentaly change the settings, and I love the grittier feel and the thumb hold which makes it easier to hold.
Скроменый эксперт
04.04.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I love this camera. I still use my DSLR when I want sharp pictures that I can only get with real optics, but this compact has redeemed the class for me. I was recommended this camera by several professional photographers and I am not disappointed. The manual mode delivers, and the RAW images are a big advantage. The compact size allows me to carry around easily and to take shots that I would otherwise look obnoxious with a full size DSLR.The ISO performance is some of the best in its class, and the price is on point. I'm glad I pulled the trigger on this and would definitely recommend it to other photographer hobbyists used to the features of a DSLR.
Скроменый эксперт
07.01.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
A great point and shoot but with limitations in low light long exposure. This camera is almost worthless for shutter speeds slower than 1/4 second at any ISO if you like night photography even under a full moon, Handling it is a great focal range, lens is resonably sharp but not very contrasty, compared to a 12MP 5d the pictures are night and day better from the full frame and easily identifiable even by a complete non picture person. Where this camera shines, is it is in your pocket when you have no other camera, and sometimes, if the light is right you can still get an amazing picture or 2. Now that sony has a large senor competitor to this camera, I think its reign has come to an end, but if it can be had for point and shoot pricing rather than prosumer pricing, I would still get this camera, make sure you purchase an aftermarket grip for it and at least one if not 2 extra batteries. I like the video and IS too they are both quite useful.
Скроменый эксперт
01.02.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I'm not much of a photographer (and definitely not tech-oriented) but I needed something for pics that would easily load onto my computer for Craig's List, relatives -- with the eventual goal of taking macro pics of jewelry. A camera that wouldn't cost an arm or leg. And wanted a camera small enough to put into a pocket. The PowerShot came highly recommended on the web, so when I saw it at a really good price, I jumped on it. Has lots of extras that I haven't had time to read up on yet, but it's pretty easy to pick up and just take general pics. Despite my talent for taking pictures of "what's that?", it does a great job just using the Auto feature. I'm sure that in the hands of someone who knows what they are doing, it would be even better. More camera than I probably need right now, but eventually I'll get a handle on all the bells and whisles.
Скроменый эксперт
25.12.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I love this camera a lot, I bought it to replace my s90 that was stolen on vacation.I read that the s95 is better than the s100, but I see no obvious issues while using it and it still takes beautiful pictures, especially at a party setting or club setting with low light setting where I don't want to carry an SLR and my Samsung or iPhone just provides too grainy of a photo from the high ISOPro:1) love the texture of the camera, it's not a smooth plastic, rather it is a matte feel that is a nice upgrade from the s902) low light performance3) adjust the picture as you see fit on the LCD before snapping4) fits in my blazer without an uncomfortable bulge of an extended lenscons:1) not an slr, of course you won't get that kind of quality or zoom that slr users are used to2) flash has mixed results, I prefer not to use it3) price, you'd think technology has improved to the point where this camera should be below US$200, but I bought it because I can't live without it after losing my s90
Скроменый эксперт
08.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
For the price, the capability you get with this thing is astounding. Unless I am shooting action photography, I really don't miss my DSLR enough to haul it around. I've always got this little thing with me, which means that I am always shooting. For $250, it is probably the greatest bang for the buck in photography right now. Skip the S110 and buy this instead. Leave it on auto or don't, but just read the manual to learn how to use it properly, and leave the GPS off to save battery. The quality photos a skilled photographer can make with this little point and shoot is great. Most of us care more about snapshots of our friends and family than we do about grand landscapes. Most of the friends and family shots take place indoors. An F/2 lens on a pocket camera is a great thing to have.Buy the wasabi battery 2 pack, or five of them, or a few extra overprice Canon extra batteries. This thing tends to juice out batteries quite quickly.
Скроменый эксперт
10.03.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
It took me a while to decide on this awesome camera, having owned quite a few point and shoots from various companies- I was skeptical to find quality in these things. A friend of mine had the S95 and let me try it out, I fell in love with it right away! Not only are the photos fantastic, the camera is easy to use and shoots great video as well to boot. I also own a GoPro which is okay, but so far the overall package of this camera has proven to be far superior. It take better photos than a GoPro and audio from the videos are way better. Even though it's not waterproof, I've dropped this camera in heavy snow (while on) several times and it's never failed (knock on wood).Canon get's my thumbs up on this product!
Скроменый эксперт
24.02.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I bought this to replace my need for a dslr. I had been contemplating a dslr for a long time, but I didn't want to get sucked into the whole lens craze. Needing one for each and every occasion. I know this was a compromise, but I am very happy with it. I'm not gonna say it's even close to a dslr with a prime, but this is a tool that shines for what it was designed for... being there when you need it. I can say that I can bring this to any event and not be "that guy". People act differently when you shove a lens in their face, but with a p&s, things are natural. It takes pretty good (don't pixel peep) pics in all sorts of light. So guess what? I'm done thinking about cameras for now. Mission accomplished! (Ghost Protocol not "W")
Скроменый эксперт
05.07.2011
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
THIS IS THE BEST LITTLE PRINTER THAT COULD! I needed high paper sheet capacity to scan and fax. I needed DESKTOP quick reference buttons from the software of the printer to do 30 page scanning (and NOT one page-at-a-time~!) and picture pdf files quickly. Most importantly it had to be affordable and absolutely something from the tech standpoint that I could set-up within 20 minutes(dummy proof) and be using it as I had an emergency business matter that night that required a quick purchase and set up.GOT IT!With my situation in mind, I immediately went to YAHOO REVIEWS~as I trust the members to review honestly and rely on their consumer opinions~ as well as Consumer Reports. The Canon Pixma MX410 was recommended by all and within 2 hours I had been to Walmart (thank you Walmart for being open 24 hours unlike the other majority of TECH retailers that close at 9pm?-hello people there are business people and students out there that can't wait for Internet shipping or for the store to open at 9am on time sensitive matters!) Walmart was open and to my glee had the Canon Pixma MX410 on sale for less $125 I had the Canon Printer, extra sets of Canon Ink (which by the way is cheaper than most!),high premier paper. Wow! All of it! Multiple page Capacity/faxing/scanning/etc. I was amazed as everything I looked at that "they" tell you you need is like $300-$400!GOT IT!Yes, I was a little anxious when I brought it home thinking that "maybe it's cheap and a piece of crap" but NO..it was GREAT! Works like a charm!GOODBYE HP-HELLO CANON! Nothing against HP lovers but this is so much more user friendly and Small Business workable for a budget!VERY easy set-up and CD to help along. My time frame was before Midnight (EST) that night and my Legal 30 page Document needed to arrive in a scanned pdf file intact, professional looking, and saved for the future...Canon helped me through the tutorial to get it done! Perfect..I was thrilled!IT JUST DOESN'T GET ANY BETTER THAN THAT! But it should because as consumers - that's what we want! We have busy lives, business deadlines, mouths to feed, exercise we can't find time for, and tech stress when our computers, printers, and machines do not work! So..kudos Canon..thanks!If you are a small business owner, a mom who wants quick recipe printouts, a 12 year old who hasn't had his/or her own printer before, a Legal student or Attorney with small office who is on a budget and needs quick printing and multiple page capacity..THIS IS IT! Even if you have never set one up...their instructions and tutoring CD will leave you feeling proud that "Hey, I know how to set up a printer and it works great!"GO CANON!! 5 stars! Thanks for the great price, great capacity printer, and the work your staff put into making it user friendly right out of the box.
Скроменый эксперт
12.11.2012
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
To be honest, I am not the best person to review this camera because I don't know it yet. However, the fact that the manufacturer did not bother to include a hard copy of the user's guide will greatly hinder me from getting to know it and to use its capacities well. Granted, Canon does provide the "Solutions Disk" with the pdf file of the manual. But what good does it do me when I am out of the house trying to take a picture? Are they thinking that I will be carrying my PC on my excursions? Or do they think that I can just commit all of the complexities of the S100's various operating modes to memory? Unfortunately, neither of these solutions work for me. I would not have bought the S100 if I knew that "in an effort to be a more green company and better protect our environment, Canon no longer offers the small printed manuals with our PowerShot cameras." After having paid over $300 for a camera, that was the response I got to my inquiry about ordering a printed version of the user's guide from Canon. My hope is that they will reconsider and print one before this hinders their sales.
Скроменый эксперт
08.06.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I choose pocket camera so I can always bring it everywhere with me to take pictures and also videos. I bought this camera because it can record video in 1080p resolution (albeit at 24 fps). But then I discovered when I use it in a quiet room, I hear rattling sounds (woodpecker sounds) every time I move the camera around. After reading forums and experimenting myself, I concluded that this is because of the Auto Focus feature of this camera while in video recording mode. What you hear is really the mechanical things moving inside the camera body. So while this keeps the video stay sharp all the time because of the auto focus, you will hear the unpleasant rattling sound as well.To fix this, especially if you care more on the sound than the sharpness of the video, you might want to disable auto focus while in video. Here's how to do it: - Set to "P" (Programs). You cannot use "AUTO" since the camera won't let you set manual focus. - Aim camera to the desired object. Press shutter half-way to set focus automatically into this object. - Press left button (on the four-way navigator) and select "MF". This will activate Manual Focus while shooting video. Note "MF" text should appear on the LCD. - Press "Video" button (the red circle) to start video recording.Another tips is you may set the RING FUNCTION button to MF (manual focus). So all you need to do is to turn the ring once to enter Manual Focus just *before* you press "Video" button. Hope this helps! I do hope that Canon find a way to eliminate this rattling sound on their next generation camera, or make it so users can have MF as the default for video recording.
Скроменый эксперт
25.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I bought this camera because I wanted a true point and shoot that I could slip into a pocket when snow skiing. The camera was easy to use after reading all the directions. As other reviewers have commented - the flash is precisely where one naturally holds the camera so anyone using it almost always blocks it when it tries to pop up. Then you turn camera off and on again. Not a reason not to buy this camera so long as other features meet your needs. I like the range of the lense from wide angle to zoom - might not be enough zoom for everyone. Hard to get more zoom on a camera this size. I'm very pleased with the photos I took both inside and outdoors. Have only seen photos on a computer. I haven't printed any yet. Camera is ready to shoot relatively quickly after turning it on. I didn't have any issues with the battery.
Показаны отзывы 289-312 из 921.
