Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Canon EOS 60D Body

I am very happy with the quality of this camera. It came highly recommended by friends and I was not disappointed.

This is my first DSLR after using a sony DSCF717 and F828. I am absolutely happy with the choice. I recommend getting the body only and buying first the lenses that fit the subject you will shoot most often. This body is comfortable, durable, and the ergonomics of the buttons are nice.

I love the camera. Got it with a 18-200 zoom lens. Great pictures and video. Only fault is that it is a little heavy.

I loved my first 60D so much that after three years of hard use my replacement camera was the same model. It took me from amateur to pro. I now own a 5D Mark iii because it fits my needs better for low-light and sports photography, but if not for that would have never upgraded from the 60D

I ordered the Canon 60D from Celltime (through amazon) as a factory refurbished unit. I prefer to buy refurbished when possible. I like that the product has been completely tested rather than hoping that it came off the assembly line in perfect condition. It arrived as described and works flawlessly. I had no trouble at all with the purchase and the delivery was on schedule. I did a lot of research prior to my purchase as I wanted a full-frame dslr. Since photography is a part time job for me I wanted a good quality camera that wouldn't break the bank. Unfortunately, a 5D MkII was just out of my budget and a 5D Classic is a still a great camera but is getting long in the tooth and has known mirror issues. Coupled with the fact that I would have to replace all my lenses, I decided to stay with a crop body. For the type of shooting I do I saw no real benefit to going with the 7D. I don't need the extra fps and the "build quality" argument a joke in my opinion. When I think about all the "plastic" power tools that I own it really becomes clear.I have been using the 60D for a while now and am pleased with it's operation. I was upgrading from a 1000D (Rebel XS)and find the auto-focus to be considerably better and the low-light performance to be very good too. I really like the auto ISO with limit function. I also like the 1/3 stop ISO intervals. The rotating LCD is nice but I rarely use it. I would not pick this camera just for that feature. I always shoot raw so the scene modes and other fluff are unimportant to me. The size and button layout work well for me. I use back-button focus and had to spend a bit of time retraining my thumb to account for the extra buttons the 60D has that the XS didn't.For me it is all about function. This camera does what I need and does it quite well. It has a ton of stuff that I don't need but that is easy enough to work around. I find the IQ to be very good especially coupled with my Sigma 17-50 f2.8. A fantastic combo. Bottom line: a great camera at a good price.

The flexibility that this camera has provided has allowed me to capture everything from model portraits to HDR landscapes - and beautifully! Is it for beginners? Sure, as long as the beginner uses the programmed settings. If the adventurous photographer wanders into the manual settings and the pictures aren't turning out as planned, chalk it up to a learning experience.In other words, this camera will not make anyone an artist but it does it's job extremely well. Canon has taken the simple concept of a light box and added a beefy CMOS panel, vibrant color processors and more. ...On a more personal note, I believe that a photo is never complete until it's been to the darkroom (aside from instamatics, it's always been that way - digital processing is no different).This technology provided me with the opportunity to take my photographic experience to the next level.I love shooting with the 60D and I recommend this camera to pro-amateurs and pro-hopefuls.

My early Christmas Present to myself, and absolutely love it. My favorite feature is the Articulating LED display screen. I use this to shot action pictures of my daughter in all her activities, from Girl Scouts to Soccer game EOS t2i, and the 60D has the same DIGIC 4 image processor. That was my biggest incentive for this Camera, that and it's durability. My t2i is still going strong and is now my back up camera. ​

I'm not sure why my previous review was rejected; it met all the guidelines. Anyway, this is a great camera. More than two years after buying it, I'm still loving it. I'd previously used the Rebel XT and XTi (350D and 400D); compared to those two, this is a world apart.

I often have to cool my images in Lightroom to get natural results. There is frequently more yellow in my pictures than I like. Does anyone know how to fix that?? I have tried all of the settings from neutral to faithful. Landscape is just way too intense and oversaturated. Most of the settings are oversaturated to me. What gives?

Gift for grandson. He's very pleased! Just getting into higher tech photography and it has many features he was looking for.

So far i love it. Good quality and i got it for easy cheaper than in stores. I would recommend this.

After a year or so, the rubber parts started to peel off. Had to glue them.The camera is great, and image quality is really what I was expecting.

Camera:The camera is great. I don't like the feeling of the buttons though, but I guess you need to get used to it. It's a sweet deal for around $600.Seller:The camera didn't have the plastic layer over the screens, which is kind of suspicious for a nbrand new camera.The package where they sent it was almost open, the bubbles that protect the box were out of air (3 out of 6 bubbles), so I was highly disappointed with that, but still, the camera works fine.

I have had this camera , mated to a Tamron 18-270, for 18 months. It is a marginally decent day camera only. Low light to dark on any setting results in zero performance. I shoot birds during the day and flying squirrels at night. If you want to capture anything at night, besides a rock, buy some other camera. If you shoot birds in trees, you will need 100 shots to get 1 decent picture. The focus ring squares are white and get totally lost in any background . Trying to talk to Canon about issues is like shouting in the wind.

Excellent pics . I feel like i should have spent a bit more for the full frame d5 . Will consider an upgrade with in the year. Rock solid build quality though

This machine is very good and recommended. It has a power to compete with high end machine. Just replace the lens with high end L lens.

love this dslr, it fits my EF & EFS line of lenses.. The versatile lens helps a lot for low and high angle shots.. less heavy compared with the 7D..

Cheap and useful. It's easy to learn how to use and not hard to take it to anywhere. The video function is very good!

I purchased a Canon EOS 60D as an upgrade for an older 10D model. I chose the 60D because it is the latest model that still uses the same lenses that fit the 10D, and since I had two rather pricey ones, the Canon Zoom Lens EF 28-135mm and a 300mm lens, I wanted a camera body where these lenses could be used. (The 60D is compatible with all EF and EF-S lenses.)Key Features:18 megapixel (The 18 megapixel 60D is an amazing camera; I'm still discovering the differences), some of which are listed below.ISO - 100 - 6400 (expandable to 12,800)5.3 fps (frames per second) for ultra-rapid-fire shooting (58 large pegs, 16 RAW)Dual-layer metering systemAudio Video that can be set to automatic or manual with noise reduction filterVideo recording in HD mode with manual exposure controlIn-Camera RAW developmentSubject Mode Ambiance Selection (standard, soft, warm, intense, cool, etc.)Multi-control dial - offers a wide range of color variations (ambiances) that works much like Photoshop, but within the camera.In-Camera conversion - lets the user go from RAW to jpeg and apply new creative filters.In-Camera creation of special effects - this one works in RAW but not jpeg.The LCD Panel is a 3-inch screen that can flip out and be set at various angles.Movie recording capability.I've found that using the long-range lens in, for example, bird photography, the 18 megapixels give an enormous advantage for cropped photos. With the 10D, distance shots cropped were always a bit fuzzy, but the 60D keeps them in sharp focus.I am not a professional photographer and the 60D offers much more than I will ever use, but I like the autofocus, love the sharp images when cropping distance shots and love the ability to convert from RAW to jpeg within the camera. I would have preferred that Canon stuck with the magnesium alloy body rather than switch to plastic, however, the plastic body is considerably lighter than my 10D and seems sturdy enough for anything I'll put it through. I'm extremely pleased with this camera and give it five stars. Because other reviewers have commented at length about the more technical aspects, I decided to review what I have personally used and found noteworthy.

I have this camera for more than 2 months now and I used it in quite a few photo sessions of friends and family, indoors and out.I got this Canon 60D camera and 18-200mm lens for $1280. This is the best deal you can get for a DSLR camera now if you want a sturdy, high quality body and don't want to pay too much.The important parameters for me in a camera, besides picture quality were professional grade shutter that can handle faster frame rates and is mechanically stronger and a pentaprism. Pentaprism is a lot more clear and illuminated and has larger magnification than pentamiror.The cheapest Nikon camera that is weather sealed and has professional grade shutter with 1/8000 sec and pentaprism is the Nikon D700 and the body alone costs more than $1200. Not to mention that a Nikon 18-200 lens costs ~$800. This means that a slightly better Nikon kit will cost more than $2000. This is not worth the difference.This camera with this lens produces amazing pictures with great detail. the RAW quality is superb. If you are shooting RAW and into doing some post processing with Canon DPP software or with Lightroom 4 (like I do), you will get amazing results with this kit. The small disadvantages of the lens (like vingeting, CA and distortion) are easily fixed with RAW with both software options I mentioned and you can improve the picture immensely. The lens is sharp except for wide open at 18mm. at 24mm it becomes very sharp and portrait shots at 40-50mm are also sharp and excellent and have a very pleasant bokeh.The camera itself and the functionality is way better than Nikon, obviously beating the cheaper D5100 and even better than the D7000 in my opinion. The Quick menu is very comfortable and the buttons and display are well placed.The only fault of this camera is in Video: First, to shoot video, you need to rotate the top dial to video mode and it is a long turn from Av/Tv modes. Second, the focusing in live view changes the lighting on the screen. I don't mind pressing half shutter or the AF button during video to focus and not having full time auto focus but the fact that it changes the lighting and records it in the video is bothersome. To avoid it I am using Manual focus in video: this also disables the focusing motor sound which is an advantage once you get used to it. Also, once getting used to it, using MF in video is quite nice and can enable some artistic shots.All together, this camera with this 18-200 lens (or even with the 18-135mm) is a great deal and a camera I will be using for many years without the need or want to replace.

I shot a feature film on it and it is a wonderful camera. I originally had the 7D, but traded it even up for the 60D because of the swivel screen. Excellen camera.

On it's own it is a great deal for $1000. Of course if you are considering this camera you aren't looking at it on it's own, you're comparing it to the Nikon D7000, Canon 7D, and Canon Rebel series. To me the Nikon looks great and maybe even the best of the bunch but I have never used Nikon and with all Canon lenses I personally wanted to stick with Canon. When compared to the 7D, well you're talking the difference between some AF points and a couple fps. Maybe 19 AF points would be an improvement but I've never used more than 9 AF points so I can't say for sure. I can say that 9 seems pretty sufficient even while tracking fast moving wildlife. Now with the fps, well I dunno, 3 frames per second is nice on paper but in the real world 5 fps is plenty fast. Unless you're making a living of sports photography in which case I would imagine an extra 3fps would be nice. In the highest quality RAW setting I can shoot at max fps for approximately 10-12 frames before the camera needs a (fairly long) break to save the data. Each 18MP file is about 25 MB. I imagine if you shoot in JPEG and/or reduced image size the save time would be reduced.The other consideration is the magnesium alloy body. The D7000 has about half a magnesium body, the 7D is fully magnesium reinforced, and the Rebel and 60D are all plastic. Plastics today are supremely strong; the 60D build quality feels excellent and the camera overall feels very robust. I had my Rebel XTi for 4.5yrs; I've traveled the world with that thing and used and abused it the whole time. I've never had any issues with its plastic. The 60D feels 100% better in my hands than the smaller Rebel. Regarding build quality, though, I do have one reservation when using my 70-200 f2.8: when switching between landscape and portrait orientations the weight of the lens is enough to warp the body ever so slightly. This warping causes the battery to move just a bit inside the camera, and I can feel a slight bump when the battery shifts. I don't believe it's anything to worry about and I don't know if magnesium alloy would make much difference. My solution is to support the 3 pound lens more than the body, thus switching orientations no longer stresses the body and no warping occurs. With smaller, more reasonably sized lenses this is not an issue.I bought the 60D mainly to upgrade the Rebel XTi's high ISO image quality as well as increase the megapixels. Reading the "on paper" specs is one thing and using the camera in the real world is another, and I am quite satisfied. What I wasn't expecting or even hoping for is the completely improved usability of the camera. By that I mean the feel, the weight, the balance, the location of the controls, and so on. The 60D feels great in my hands, the controls are much easier than the Rebel, and it's overall capabilities are expanded considerably. The 7D, at 600-700 dollars more seemed too pricey for the few extra features especially since the CMOS sensor is the same in the Rebel, 60D, and 7D thus image quality will be the same. The 60D has the articulating screen which I've used a few times already. If I was a professional photographer taking shots every single day, I would probably lean toward the 7D with the 60D as a backup. I consider myself a serious amateur and the 60D fits my needs perfectly at a great price for the camera.Apparently it shoots video too; I don't care though, if I wanted a video camera I would have bought a video camera, ha!

The camera body is a definite step up in construction from the rebel series. You pay for it with extra weight, but that's ok. The 18 135mm lense it's a great all purpose walk around lense. It's enough zoom for most occasions, and it's image quality exceeds my skill so it suits me fine.

It's my first real camera. It's friendly and easy to use. It's a bit heavy though, and I guess I'll just need to get use to it.But the Pics are amazing :)