Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II
Где купить
Фотоаппарат Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II
|
Компактный фотоаппарат, черный | Яндекс Маркет | 2 530 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
SONY Фотоаппарат SONY CYBER-SHOT DSC-H300, черный | Яндекс Маркет | 24 700 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
SONY Фотоаппарат Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W610 | Яндекс Маркет | 25 400 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
SONY Фотоаппарат Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 | Яндекс Маркет | 25 400 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
SONY Фотоаппарат Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W510 | Яндекс Маркет | 29 400 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
Фотоаппарат Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | Яндекс Маркет | 31 000 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 Black Цифровой компактный фотоаппарат | Яндекс Маркет | 48 500 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 Violet Цифровой компактный фотоаппарат | Яндекс Маркет | 48 500 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 Pink Цифровой компактный фотоаппарат | Яндекс Маркет | 52 500 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
Фотоаппарат Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100M7, черный | Яндекс Маркет | 200 000 ₽ | Посмотреть |
Плюсы по отзывам пользователей - Почему стоит купить Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II?
- Отличное качество изображений, особенно в слабом освещении:
- Матрица 1 дюйма обеспечивает резкие снимки с низким уровнем шумов до ISO 3200, превосходя многие зеркалки в компактном корпусе (множество отзывов сравнивают с Canon 5D, Nikon D800).
- Светосильный объектив Zeiss f/1.8-2.8 даёт красивое боке и детализацию, подходящую для печати 30x45 см.
- HDR и DRO режимы улучшают динамический диапазон без постобработки.
- Компактные размеры и портативность:
- Помещается в карман брюк или сумку, всегда под рукой, заменяет смартфон и DSLR для путешествий (похвалы от пользователей с семьями и туристов).
- Лёгкий вес (около 240 г), но солидная металлическая сборка.
- Выдвижной электронный видоискатель (EVF) в M3:
- Удобен в яркий день, стабилизирует съёмку у лица, автоматическое включение камеры при выдвижении.
- Высокое разрешение (1.44 млн точек), лучше LCD в солнце.
- Поворотный экран и эргономика:
- Экран наклоняется на 180° для селфи и съёмки от бедра/над головой.
- Кнопка FN для быстрого доступа к ISO, WB, эффектами; кольцо объектива программируется.
- Качественная видеосъёмка:
- XAVC S (50 Мбит/с, 60p/24p), отличная стабилизация SteadyShot, звук без шумов зума.
- Сравнима с dedicated камкордерами, подходит для Full HD.
- Wi-Fi/NFC и беспроводная передача:
- Быстрое соединение с телефоном для просмотра/управления/передачи фото.
- Удобно для Instagram или удалённой съёмки (таймер/зум).
- Многорежимность и RAW:
- Автоинтеллект распознаёт сцены, ручные режимы P/A/S/M, серийная съёмка 10 к/с.
- RAW+JPEG для постобработки в Lightroom.
Минусы по отзывам пользователей - О чем стоит задуматься перед покупкой:
- Слабый хват и маленькие кнопки:
- Скользкий корпус, требует доп. грипа (Sony AG-R1 за 1000 руб.), иначе рискует выпасть из рук (жалобы от пользователей с большими ладонями).
- Кнопки тесные, случайное нажатие power/флэш.
- Сложное и запутанное меню:
- Логіка навигации нелинейная, много вкладок без подсказок; нужно привыкать неделями (частые жалобы новичков и профи).
- Нет touchscreen, фокус только кнопками.
- Маленький аккумулятор и зарядка:
- Держит 200-300 снимков, быстро садится на видео/Wi-Fi; нет внешнего ЗУ в комплекте (зарядка по micro-USB медленная, 4 часа).
- Требует запасных батарей NP-BX1.
- Короткий зум и ограничения объектива:
- 3.6x (24-70 мм экв. в M3), не для телепортретов/дикой природы; шум зума на видео.
- Выдвижной объектив рискует повреждений в кармане.
- Хрупкий экран и сборка:
- Легко царапается, требует защиты (PCK-LM15); люфт экрана/крышки у некоторых экземпляров.
- Китайская сборка с клеем/отходящими деталями (редкие браки).
- Автофокус в сложных условиях:
- Медленный в темноте/движении, сбивается на фоне; нет GPS.
- Шторка 1/30 с в авто-ISO слишком долгая для ручника.
- Высокая цена и аксессуары:
- Дорого для компакта (от 30-50 тыс. руб.), допы (EVF 30 тыс., грип 1 тыс.) раздуты.
- Нет чехла/ЗУ в комплекте.
*Плюсы и минусы, которые пользователи называют чаще всего на основе практического опыта использования.
646 отзывов пользователей о Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II
Пользовались
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Скромный эксперт
01.01.2014
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I echo all the accolades of this camera from other reviewers. RX100M2 produces beautiful images that rival (or sometimes better than) DSLRs. The new backside illuminated sensor is supposed to be 40% better at gathering light than the 1st gen RX, though this has been debated. The daytime photos are fine. Evening/low-light photos are another story.There is one big problem that just destroys the camera experience for me. I'm a long-time photo enthusiast and understand enough about photography and cameras. I'm not a beginner-DSLR user that never graduates from the 18-55mm kit lens and full auto mode. But carrying a DSR kit while hiking the mountains in Canada, I got tired of all the bulk and subsequently sold and bought a NEX outfit (currently 5R). I also wanted to upgrade my p&s Nikon P310 (a 2012 camera) as a capable complimentary camera to the NEX, so I bought the RX100M2.Especially for p&s cameras, I prefer to use the cameras in "P" mode for the least amount of thinking. Sure I can tinker with all the dials and settings like a DSLR but you know what, most of the time, I'd rather let the camera do the job, intelligently, and intervene when I have to. The one huge problem with RX100 is that if you have auto-ISO and in low light, then the max shutter speed that the camera chooses is 1/30 and even with OIS and with my best efforts to keep the camera still, I often get blurry photos in low-light situations. A handheld, auto-ISO 1/30 is too slow for this camera and you cannot set min shutter speed with auto ISO. I've gotten more blurry handheld photos than I've ever gotten compared to my older, tiny-sensor Nikon P310 in similar lighting situations. The components inside the camera are not to blame. It's how they're being used. Why did Sony choose to cap the camera at 1/30 knowing this is too slow for handheld shots? I just don't get it. Yes, I can set it on Shutter priority and force faster shutter. Or I can boost ISO for the shots that need it. But then now I feel like I'm using a DSLR, which is what I don't want using the RX to feel like, and even with DSLRs, you don't have to do this much tinkering for a quick/easy shot. It's a P&S after all - a capable one, but for my usage, I'd prefer to use it like a P&S and don't want to be adjusting the controls on every shot I take. In a dimly lit environment, it's very difficult to simply turn on the camera, have it in auto-mode and snap and get a good blur-free pic. Instead, I feel like you have to endlessly tinker with shutter and ISO settings to "get it right". Imagine being out with friends at a restaurant - you're either taking photos of them or your food (and forget asking the waiter to take a group photo w/o flash - but to be fair, that's probably the case with other cameras too). This simple task now feels like a big chore b/c it's not a simple 1-2-go operation. I never had this problem with my Nikon P310. And come to think of it, not with my NEX 5R (or the previous 5N) either. So I spent $600+ on a camera I can't simply turn on and snap when it's dark. I'll give you an example. I took a pic indoors in a semi-well lit env. Not outdoors-bright, not an Italian restaurant for dinner dark. In Program mode, the camera took a photo of the subject at 1/5, f4.5, ISO400. The resulting photo is blurry and unusable. My point is simply this - why is the camera programmed for such a dismal aperture/shutter/ISO combination when in many real-life, hand-held situations, the resulting images are just unusable? In dark settings, the camera should boost ISO (to a point) until the shutter speed becomes usable for handheld pics. Sure it's noisier but I'd rather have noisier, usable pics than clean but blurry, unusable pics. Plus, this camera can handle higher ISOs anyway.On many occasions, the camera also chooses to set low ISO and compensates for that by setting the aperture wide open (1.8)... it's great if you want to get bokeh deliberately but not when you're taking a closeup of something (i.e. your dinner) and only part of the image is in focus because of the shallow DOF. That's when the 1" sensor gets in the way compared to other P&S with equally large apertures but smaller sensors.The 1/30 issue is extremely disappointing and frustrating for such an expensive camera with so many good features packed. On top of that, this camera is supposed to be the low light champ. Why couldn't Sony get this right? All it takes is a firmware update to fix this well-documented problem that's existed since the original RX but Sony hasn't corrected this. My workaround is using Shutter mode in dark places, using shutter speeds that I know won't create blur hoping for aperture and ISO to adjust and take care of the rest. Though when I do this, it tends to open the aperture to max so again, you're not getting the sharpest pics and now you get unwanted bokeh. So to close the aperture, I'd raise ISO manually. But if it's still not closing up, then I'd go to aperture mode to close it up.
Скромный эксперт
03.12.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
There is no such thing as the perfect camera. In general, small cameras must sacrifice picture quality for convenience; most professional grade cameras must sacrifice portability. I chose the RX-100- II as a possible compromise, choosing portability with the expectation that I would have the camera with me more often, and because of the relatively large sensor the photo quality would satisfy for most purposes. After about a month of use, I find the camera is slightly less portable than I thought. At the same time the picture quality far exceeds my expectations.On the portability - it's a small point, but that was the rationale for getting a compact - it is just big and heavy enough to be awkward in my jeans pockets. If the pocket is loose enough, like a jacket pocket, there is no problem, even if the power button is accidentally pushed and the lens extends. But in my pants pockets, it's a squeeze getting the camera in and out, and if the lens extends when you reach in for the camera, extracting becomes a major operation. After trying the pocket route for several weeks, I decided to purchase the beautiful Sony camera case that comes with a shoulder strap. This is more convenient than digging the camera out of your pocket, although the camera is less concealed, but having the option works well for different shooting situations.The picture quality is much better than I expected. The main reason I chose this camera is the sensor size, which is among the largest of any compact camera. Unsurprisingly, in my test comparisons of the same shot, it beat hell out of my older point and shoot, but I didn't expect it to run circles around my 5-year old Olympus DSLR. SLRs are supposed to give better results than compacts, period. Apparently not so. Except for rare situations where an extended telephoto is needed, if picture quality is essential, there is no good reason for me NOT to use the Sony. The resolution, color rendition, relatively low noise even at 1600 ISO and above, low light capability with its f1.8 lens, all this in addition to the extensive control features -- this is one terrific package.Some of the disadvantages (I've listed them below) were inherent in the design of a compact, so I don't downgrade it for being what it is. I haven't tried all the features yet, including video, but overall for two main reasons so far I give this the highest rating: 1) The picture quality exceeds my expectations. I was planning to invest in a full-frame DSLR as well, but for my purposes, after seeing what this camera can do, I'm not sure I'll bother. In the long run, this may offset the disadvantage of camera's expensive price; 2) There is virtually unlimited control if you want it, as much or more than most DSLRs. But the two automatic modes quickly and accurately determine ideal settings if you're in a hurry or if you just prefer to leave decisions up to the camera. In summary:The good:* compact - fits in jacket pocket or fanny pack, a bit of a squeeze for jeans, but beats an SLR for travel.* rugged construction, heavy weight (even though aluminum), doesn't feel cheap* Modest appearance for security: doesn't call attention to itself as an "expensive" camera.* fold down 3" LED screen - good for shading and angle shots. - an upgrade from the earlier model RX-100 which does not fold out, and well worth the extra expense.* Superior quality photos for any camera, particularly a compact: -- considerably sharper, less noise and better color rendition than my SLR.* large sensor for a compact: close to 4/3 size* Good dynamic range: ISO to 1600 with virtually no noise, higher when needed.* Fast lens: f1.8 max aperture (f4.9 at telephoto position). Great for low light situations.* Good resolution at 20 mp (RAW image), 6-8mp (.jpg).* sharp lens* Excellent macro position - as close as 2"* RAW capabilities (.arw) - see below* Flexible arrangement of dials and buttons, most are programmable to user's choice, a huge plus (i.e., traditional "focus" ring can be used for manual focus, exposure compensation, ISO, aperture, shutter speed, etc.)* Lens cover closes when lens retracts - provides lens protection without having to place and remove cap. A major convenience in my view.* Menu intuitive and extensive.* Good battery life.The bad:* No viewfinder -Difficult or impossible to compose shots in bright sun. This is a big sacrifice, but necessary for compactness.* Expensive for a compact, and expensive accessories (i.e.,case = $70)* Small size awkward to manipulate if you're used to full-size SLR.* Zoom only 3X telephoto, not extensive.* RAW files are proprietary Sony .arw - requires conversion to .dng for Lightroom 4, i.e., a slight inconvenience.* WI-FI doesn't connect to my iMac. Others have reported this problem. I'm using Eye-FI instead, but the USB cable is fast and easy enough. I haven't tried the NFC and probably won't have much use for it.* No GPS, but Eye-Fi memory card (optional) has WPS.* Some edge distortion
Скромный эксперт
22.02.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I've been using a Canon Powershot for years now and have very little experience with fiddling with camera settings. I just point and shoot. But that camera is showing its age and it was time to upgrade, and I was interested in a bit more engagement with the camera. A DSLR seemed like too much so I went for this one, and I have no regrets at all.The image quality is excellent. At the "Intelligent Auto" mode, which is basically a standard point and shoot mode, I consistently get good pictures. The largish sensor also means that I can crop or zoom poorly framed pictures and they'll still be really high quality. Best of all, it means I can hand the camera to my wife and she'll be able to use it and still get good results. So right off the bat you get a camera that takes great pictures and is really easy to use.The remaining modes are a bit overwhelming at first, but once you start trying them out their uses become more apparent and they're all still pretty easy to use. Basically each setting changes what the lens ring adjusts, while still holding your hand and auto-selecting most of your options. So this camera in a lot of ways is a stepping stone to a DSLR, where you can learn about how to set your shutter speed, aperture, etc. while the camera helps make sure you don't screw up your pictures. You could probably set the camera to Intelligent Auto permanently and still get great pictures 90% of the time though. But take advantage of the other modes and you can make a lot of good adjustments that the computer can't quite do.For me, where the camera shines is the Shutter control setting and the burst mode settings. Taking pictures of my kids typically results in blurs and missed shots. With the ability to set a fast shutter speed and burst photos that's a thing of the past. Action shots are crisp, and usually I'll have a bunch of them in sequence thanks to burst capture, so I can pick the best one. Or upload them all to Google Drive and they get "auto awesomed" into a GIF or cool time lapse shot.Another notable thing is the dedicated video button, which eliminates the fumbling to switch to video mode (or back if you forget after taking a video). The video quality isn't the best (my 4-5 year old HD camcorder still gets better quality) but it's still pretty good. You can take pictures during the video capture which is great too. It's a nice plus overall, but if you're doing a lot of video capture an HD camcorder is a better choice.The camera itself is typical Sony engineering. They've crammed a lot of technology into a small body, cleverly hidden the ports, and made the whole thing pretty sleek. This is actually a bit of a drawback; the lens is kind of huge relative to the small body of the camera, which can make it hard to hold. I got a leather case for the camera that alleviates that problem nicely though. The camera is still bigger than most point and shoots, although smaller than the G1 or other large sensor cameras. Also in typical Sony style, the menus are awful. They get the job done, and are pretty clear as to what they do, but there are a lot of them to get through.The connectivity features are excellent. They are fairly easy to get working, and once you do you can back up your photos easily to your computer or phone. This is huge for me, no more plugging my camera into my computer or pulling out the SD card. Just turn on the computer, hit "send to computer" and you're done. Come back in a bit and all your new photos are on your computer. The smartphone transfer is easy if you have an NFC enabled phone, although the process is a bit slow. Smartphone control is a bit too slow to be super-useful, but it's nice in a pinch if you're taking group photos or something. If someone wants a photo off the camera its now really easy to transfer it. It's not quite as easy to send to someone compared to smartphone pictures, but it's close, and the marginal effort needed is certainly worth it to get the far better image quality.The only real downsides to the camera, other than the size and menu issues I mentioned, is probably the price. It's pretty expensive and you can get a DSLR for the same or less that can probably produce better pictures. Also, if you're just going to point and shoot, you can get cameras that are almost as good but much cheaper. But as in terms of being easy to use, while still giving you lots of control over your settings, I don't think this camera can be beat.
Скромный эксперт
14.09.2013
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I've been using compact cameras for recording indie rock/folk shows, from big venues to basement shows, for a few years now. The idea was to capture the look and sound at being at the show as unobtrusively as possible. I started off with a Kodak Zi6, and then several months later replaced that with the Kodak Zi8 with a Sony DSM-DS70P mic plugged into it. This turned out to be very good combo at the time and for a couple of years afterwards. There was no good follow-up device from Kodak and they exited the camera business. Alternatives from other manufacturers all had deal-breaking drawbacks, usually in regards to not having a mic-in jack. Nikon came out with the semi-compact Coolpix P7000 and I got that because it did have a mic-in jack, but while it took nice pictures, it was rubbish as a videocam -- fussy with plug-in microphones and issues with focusing, and even color drift. I updated its firmware and got its color drifting repaired under warranty, but it was really only good as a camera and not as a Zi8 alternative. I finally got a Sony HX9V after seeing some live music videos online, despite it not having a mic-in jack. I got got a Zoom H2n Handy Recorder to record the main audio (the HX9V's audio track was used only for syncing), and mounted it on a hand-holdable bracket with the Sony. This made for an awkward combo to hold and operate, and more tedious post-processing, but resulted in some very nice looking & sounding videos. I later on got a Zoom Q2HD Handy HD Video Recorder with 2GB SD Card and Two AA Batteries pocket videocam as something a lot more convenient to use and edit, like how the the Zi8 was, and while its audio was stellar, better than even the H2n at rock club sound levels, the video was only very modestly better than the Zi8's, and definitely inferior to the HX9V's in most cases (the Q2HD has has this "Concert Lighting" mode that actually helped it take better videos in extreme lighting conditions than the HX9V.)When Blackmagic announced their Pocket Cinema Camera earllier this year, I thought I finally found my ultimate rock club camera, but that has been plagued with delays, and early reviews and videos were not what I expected -- I was just looking for a compact videocam that can handle typical rock club and basement lighting and sound, and not some very fussy, battery eating puppy shaped like a camera. In the meantime the Sony RX100 II came out to glowing reviews, and with a proprietary hotshoe, the "Multi-Interface Shoe," that can take a Sony microphone, the Sony ECM-XYST1M Stereo Microphone (Black). Unfortunately, there were no good videos to be found on the Internet using this combo that applied to what I had in mind. It seemed like a not too risky a risk, though, so I ended up ordering both the RX100 II and its matching mic. My verdict:Short version: When it's good, it's very, very good, but there are so many gotchas overall that I'm likely going to return the RX100 II at least (I may replace it with the much cheaper HX50V because that can also use the ECM-XYST1M mic.)Longer version: My HX9V made for a good comparison -- the RX100 II is about the same size and has similarly laid out controls and options. My first video tests were at two small clubs with dimmish lighting that's normally are a struggle for my HX9V, and the results were confusing at first: with the RX100 II at its default wide angle, it definitely shot brighter than the HX9V would. But when I zoomed in, things darkened quite a bit. When I got this Sony combo, I was initially more concerned about the ECM-XYST1M because it simply attached and there is no level control whatsoever either on the unit or in the RX100 II. But this performed very, very well even when I shot some videos deliberately by the main club speakers to see it that would cause distortion. It's audio on needed some mild EQing in the editing later on, and it had very impressive frequency range to just over 20 kHz.As far as that strange darkening while zooming issue I ran into, later experimenting showed that this was caused by leaving it in its default "Program Auto" movie mode. To keep things from darkening while zooming, I had to set movie mode to "Aperture Priority". This brought up the first big "Gotcha!": when you do set it into "Aperture Priority" mode, the overall video brightness drops a lot if you're in a dimly or complexly lit room. So while it doesn't darken while zooming in this mode, it basically cheats by starting off dark to begin with! A recent second test at a larger music venue with more typical rock club spotlighting verified this: while in "Program Auto" mode, the video went from actually too bright to too dark, while Aperture Mode was generally too dark overall, and with very murky colors compared to what I was seeing in Program Auto mode. To get a balanced video, I zoomed in while in Progam Auto mode until I was happy with the overall brightness level and then simply kept it there -- no more zooming, in or out. This sort of wo
Скромный эксперт
26.07.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
m2TWGRBMKA0SUI / mo153K787DYXEY2 Length:: 5:48 Mins♦ Brief ♦I purchased the RX100 last year, which has since been my favourite compact camera to use, and so far I haven't come across a camera that betters it, that is of course until this upgrade that brings some much welcomed extras.Here are some of the upgraded features:☑ An improved sensor (Exmor R CMOS Sensor); it's still the same size and has the same effective mega-pixels, but is now backlit which means it's able to pick up light by a further 40%.☑ Hot-shoe; no idea why they didn't include this on the previous version, but at least it's here now.☑ Tilt-able screen; one of the things I was longing for on the old RX100, this is one of my favourite upgrades by far!☑ NFC (Near-field communications); I love this extra feature, by tapping the bottom of this camera onto your phone that has NFC enabled, it will connect them both together straight away.If you don't have PlayMemories Mobile installed, it will take you to the store to download it (for free), if you have it installed already, it will connect them both together where you can then control the camera with your phone, though the modes are limited, you're able to take stunning quality photos and instantly transfer them over to your phone when taken.☑ 24p recording; an extra welcomed option for those who love having more choice when recording (24p, 60i & 60p).☑ PAL & NTSC choice; in the settings you can switch from one to the other which I'm sure certain people will love.- Zoom is still 3.6x optical zoom, this is normal for high-quality compact cameras such as this one.☒ One thing this camera doesn't have is a touch-screen, this is debatable as a lot of people like this kind of feature, however others don't, personally I'm not a fan of touch-screen on cameras; I have a NEX 5RL and I always use the buttons to navigate, I hate using the touch-screen for some reason.☒ Grip is minimal (best used with the wrist strap), once again this is down to preference, I like the combination of the sleek style whilst having just enough grip, but others may not like this.- - -♦ Box contents & recommended items ♦Included in the box are the following:Camera | AC adapter | Battery | Micro USB cable | Wrist strap | Two shoulder strap adapters | Manual.Things you NEED:SDHC Memory Card (You can choose a different brand/memory capacity, though do remember as this is a 20MP camera, files sizes average between 3MB-5MB if your using Jpeg in fine detail, or is around 20MB if using the RAW format (RAW image has a '.ARW' file extension)).Optional:Camera Case (LCJ-RXC) | SDHC Card Reader | Spare Battery NP-BX1 | HDMI - Micro HDMI Cable.- - -♦ Settings & Modes ♦Just like the RX100, this is aimed towards people who are more advanced in photography due to it's great amount of changeability in settings, that said, like most cameras these days, regardless if it's a professional camera or for basic needs, they all seem to have automatic modes which allow people to snap shots quickly without having to worry about tweaking the settings in most situations.The interface is pretty much identical to that of the RX100, with the addition of a few extra available settings located within the menu, for those who haven't seen it before all the settings are changed within the main menu, unlike the other cyber-shot cameras where a side menu pops up allowing you to change settings whilst being able to see what the camera is pointing at, this one has a solid menu that covers the whole screen, which is very appropriately tabbed making it easy to navigate.Though if you wish to change a few settings quickly without going into the main menu, you can edit the 'Fn' button options (located on setting tab 2 in the main menu), this will give you the choice to select 7 out of 17 settings which will instantly be available upon pressing the 'Fn' button, choices range from image size, exposure, ISO, white balance, picture effects, HDR etc...This function is partially transparent, so you can see where your pointing at.To change modes, all you have to do is twist the mode dial located on top of the camera to the setting you want:Intelligent Auto | Superior Auto | Program Auto* | Aperture Priority* | Shutter Priority* | Manual Exposure* | Memory recall** | Movie | Sweep Panorama | Scene Selection***.* Advanced modes which allow you more customization in the settings.** Allows you to set three different profiles, giving you quick access to your favourite settings.*** Gives you a choice of many pre-set modes such as 'portrait', 'landscape', 'night scene' etc...- - -♦ Image Quality ♦The quality is utterly fantastic, the camera is able to focus quickly to the subject to then take very nice sharp photos.This camera is able to deliver an amazing amount of depth of field (obviously depends on which mode or settings you use), and found it be a bit more better than the previous RX100 when it comes to focusing on subjects at a closer range.Due to it's sensor it's able to produce g
Скромный эксперт
31.07.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
My primary camera is a Sony A65 with a G Series 70-300mm zoom, a macro prime, a wide angle prime and a 18-135mm kit lens. I shoot wild life, ultra marathons, sunsets, friend's weddings, events and anything else that takes my fancy. I keep buying point and shoot cameras because I love the idea of a pocket sized camera that is always ready. But the image quality is never good enough and I end up selling them. I read the reviews of the RX100 and decided to go all in on the RX100 II. Maybe this time I'd find a worthy compact camera to supplement my A65.I got the Sony RX100 II on the day it was released (thanks Amazon). I had bought the Wasabi external charger and spare batteries from Amazon in anticipation, so I could start shooting immediately I got the RX100.If you have used Sony Alpha cameras, the menus are easy to navigate. I soon figured out how to shoot in Manual mode and how to use the front dial and rear wheel to adjust shutter speed, ISO and f-stop quickly. The only problem I found was I'd sometimes pop-up the flash menu while using the rear wheel. I shoot RAW and JPG. Until Adobe release support for the RX100M2, I need to use Sony's image converter to process the RAW files. It creates a TIFF file that loads into PSE 11.The camera feels very solid and it is easy to handle. I keep putting my left forefinger over the flash, but I've kept the flash turned off, so it isn't a problem so far. The LCD screen pivots nicely, so you can take overhead shots and shots with the camera held low and discreetly. I do miss the A65's EVF but I'm not quite ready to spring for the RX1's $400+ EVF option.Image quality is amazing. I compared macro shots of bumblebees on flowers taken with the A65 and 300mm zoom and the RX100. The RX100, wide open at f1.8, and held 2" away from the subject delivered more detail and nice brokeh. The RX100 turns out to be a great camera for casual macro photography.The few sunset shots I've taken match those taken by the A65.The WIFI capabilities will appeal to many users. It was very easy to pair the camera with my PC and my old Android phone. I can use the phone as a remote control and view finder. I haven't tried it yet, but I'm planning to use this feature to shoot small birds, such as hummingbirds.I shot an ultra-marathon using the A65 and the 18-135 zoom. I considered using the RX100, but the lack of a view finder stayed my hand. If Sony releases a cheaper, lower-res EVF for the RX100, I'd be in hog heaven.It is starting to look like the RX100 is going to be my primary camera, with the A65 staying home until I need the reach of the 300mm zoom or the power of an external flash. I am blown away by the RX100 and I've just started dipping into its capabilities. I'll update this review as I use the camera in different shooting situations.I was going to give it 4 stars because it doesn't have an affordable view finder option. I'd like a lower resolution EVF that would plug into the multi interface shoe. On the other hand, an external view finder compromises the ideal of a pocketable camera that is ready to shoot at a moment's notice.Update - Aug 1st, 2013:I just discovered that when the camera is off, I just have to touch the review button to see my pictures. This saves the camera from extending the lens.I bought the Sony PCKLM15 LCD Protector for DSC-RX1 (Black) to protect the screen. This has a stiff border and seems to be better than those 3rd party films. I also ordered the Sony RM-VPR1 Remote Control with Multi-Terminal for when I use a tripod and the Sony ADPMAA Shoe Adaptor for Mi Shoe so I can mount my Sony DSLR Alpha HVL-F43AM Camera Flash. Will update again after I've tried them out.Update - Aug 4th, 2013The RM-VPR1 works very well on the RX100. I'll be using next time I need to take tripod mounted shots. The Shoe Adaptor makes it easy to mount the F43AM flash. There is a protective cover you need to remove from the adaptor before you can slide it onto the camera. The combination of a large flash unit and the tiny RX100 looks odd and makes the camera more difficult to handle. You end up holding the flash and the camera. It sort of defeats the portability requirement, but the camera takes such great photos that you can use it in contexts where you would normally use a DSLR.Update - Aug 12th, 2013I tried using my old Android phone as a remote control to take pictures of a hummingbird at a feeder, using Sony's Play Memories app. This could be a great feature but it is fairly primitive; it seems to be geared towards getting photos from the camera to social media. It was sluggish and introduced a long delay between shots. You couldn't trigger a burst of shots, even though the camera can do that. Focus is an issue, because you don't want to introduce focussing delays and sounds. I chose to use manual focus and pre-focussed to where the bird would be. Despite the limitations, I got a few nice shots of a hummingbird shooting while wide open (f/1.8). Next time, I'll zoom in. If Sony could mi
Скромный эксперт
06.08.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
The RX100 is agreeably one of the best cameras Sony has ever invented, although its performance falls behind the DSC-HX30V; however, the image quality is far better on the RX100. This is because the sensor on the RX100 is four times larger. However, if you mostly shoot video with the camera, the HX30V is a better choice, especially if you prefer to record in 1280x720, which the RX100 cannot do, and neither does the RX100M2. However, you get the 24p AVCHD 1920x1080 ability to shoot, choice between 17mbps (divide by 8 to get MB per second; 8 bits per byte) or 24mbps. This is better than the 28mbps at the 60p setting, as each individual frame is less compressed or has more color to it. Do the math; the 24p versus 60p setting yields about 50% larger file size, useful for extracting a frame from a movie clip. You cannot shoot stills in the 60p setting, and the image quality is atrocious because a small region of the sensor is used for video-recording, and the file is enlarged to the 17MP (you cannot shoot 20MP stills in video mode because of the aspect ratio at 16:9 versus the 3:2 for the 20MP still setting). Video quality is the same. You get very smooth capture at the 60p setting, but the interlaced mode I do not use due to playback problems. Somehow, it is either my computer, or the interlaced 60i codec does not work as well as the one on an NEX model, for instance. I am unsure if this issue were resolved, as I have not had the desire to shoot at the 60i setting on the DSC-HX5V, which I used to own but wrote a review on back in the day. The HX5V's interlaced AVCHD was very jittery and blocky, and that had me frustrated since.First, the photo quality is the same as the RX100, and the autofocus is no better either. I found the RX100 did a little better job with the contrast detect. Perhaps the BSI CMOS sensor is just hype, or there is a setting I am unsure about to make it work properly. If anyone has a solution to this, please let me know. Other reviewers say this camera is a step up from the succssor, but the image quality certainly is iffy on my testing experience.The upgrades are the hotshoe, but I do not care about that only due to that they are pricey, and the pop-up flash is adequate for my needs. The WiFi does not interest me right now because I have no iPhone or Android 3/4G Network capability. Is nice for those who have such a phone. The next upgrade and the fourth one are minor. Yes, very minor... As I said, the 24p is the most important to me, for quality, and less disk space consumed. The BSI CMOS sensor, even if it is better than the RX100, is hardly enough to convince worthy of the upgrade if that is what your main area of necessity plays out.Have read that RX100 users should not consider upgrading to the RX100M2 unless the hotshoe and WiFi are most important, and I agree.This camera given four stars because you can get a similar camera with much better performance and image quality for a lot less, although performance and video quality may be a little less than that of RX100. I would recommend the Nikon P7100 over the RX100 if 12MP (not 20) is important to you, but keep this in mind. You have no dedicated movie mode, and cannot photograph during the movie capture. It has no AVCHD capability either, just MP4. The main reasons to choose the Nikon are it is cheaper, has half the sensor size of the RX100 but image quality is amazing (DSLR-like clarity and sharpness--very sharp at ISO 100), flip-out swiveling screen (Canon-style), and pocketable with a neck strap. You get no neck strap with RX100. Bummer. (Just the wrist strap.) RX100's tilting screen, like the NEX, is tricky, and I don't intend to try to "move" it as it could be damaged. One more note on the Nikon; autofocus for photos is faster than the RX100/M2, but the movie performance is not quite so good; hunts but quite clean in low-light as the Sony.Hope this helps. Even though the RX100M2 was a little disappointing (especially since the RX100 actually did better in very low-light conditions, surprisingly), if you already have that camera, and do not need the hotshoe (accessories very expensive and proprietary anyway) and WiFi, I cannot recommend this item. Stick with the RX100, and maybe if you do not have either, buy it used or new, if the price has fallen below the MSRP. Thank you.Matt Eye, an avid "professional" photographer/videographer
Скромный эксперт
01.03.2014
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I tried to record a musical production in the old Saenger Theater here last night using the RX100II and a Canon Powershot S120. Tried is the key word. I have large hands. The video button on the RX100II is almost impossible for me to use much less find in the dark. I have to use a fingernail to depress it. There is no way to do this smoothly. The recording indicator is confusing when one is in a hurry. It says recording when you have actually just ended a recording so that if you are not entirely focused you think you are still recording. I missed a key scene involving my granddaughter through the combination of the record button being so demanding to use and the confusing interface. The camera is so extremely slow in everything it does in the video mode, especially autofocusing, that it is mostly useless for anything other than just turning it on and letting it run at a fixed distance. It is very difficult if not impossible to operate this camera in the dark with the small and numerous buttons.Although I am disappointed and perturbed, perhaps all of this is just the provence of the pocket camera class and I should not be complaining; however, I bought the camera based on reviews that seemed to say that the RX100II had somehow transcended the point-and-shoot level of usability and performance. It takes decent stills. I own other Sony cameras, including the R1, which I love.On the other hand, the Canon S120 is much much faster in all of its operations. It also has controls that I can use with my fingertips (not to mention a touch screen). I have the S110 and the S100 and the S90 and the S20 also. The S120 is a huge improvement over the S110 in multiple ways. The buttons are slightly convex which makes all the difference. Canon is not ashamed to make the video button usable for someone like me. The interface is less confusing. The stills are more than adequate for a pocket camera.I would like to see a pocket camera with the speed, buttons and touch interface of the Canon and the size, screen and sensor of the Sony. I have handled the Panasonic GM1 and would have bought it; however, it, like the RZ100II, is too fiddly for my hands.I own a collection of Nikon and Canon DSLR's (which fit my hands but I rarely use anymore) and a Panasonic GX1 and an Olympus OMD E5 and an OMD E1. All of the Micro 4/3 cameras are small for my hands but I tolerate this for their size and weight advantages.I will lug the OMD E1, conspicuous as it is, to the next theatrical performance.Addendum 20140302: I need to give the RX100II more credit for it's stills performance which is excellent especially in low light. The sensor and the lens work together at all focal lengths to make sharp pictures with accurate colors. The WIFI transfer function (which I use a lot with my iPad) is extremely fast, much faster than any of my other cameras that have this feature.Addendum 20140323: Today the SD card will not longer insert into its slot. Something is protruding into the slot half way in and I can't get it bent back. Seems to be part of the slot construction and not something loose having fallen in. The camera is out of window to send back to Amazon. Guess I will have to package it up to Sony and see what happens. A real pain.
Показаны отзывы 1-8 из 646.
Где купить
Фотоаппарат Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II
|
Компактный фотоаппарат, черный | Яндекс Маркет | 2 530 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
SONY Фотоаппарат SONY CYBER-SHOT DSC-H300, черный | Яндекс Маркет | 24 700 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
SONY Фотоаппарат Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W610 | Яндекс Маркет | 25 400 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
SONY Фотоаппарат Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2100 | Яндекс Маркет | 25 400 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
SONY Фотоаппарат Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W510 | Яндекс Маркет | 29 400 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
Фотоаппарат Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | Яндекс Маркет | 31 000 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H90 Black Цифровой компактный фотоаппарат | Яндекс Маркет | 48 500 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 Violet Цифровой компактный фотоаппарат | Яндекс Маркет | 48 500 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 Pink Цифровой компактный фотоаппарат | Яндекс Маркет | 52 500 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
Фотоаппарат Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100M7, черный | Яндекс Маркет | 200 000 ₽ | Посмотреть |
График изменения цены Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II
Характеристи Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II
Информация о характеристиках носит справочный характер.
Перед покупкой уточняйте характеристики и комплектацию товара у продавца
Обзоры и руководства на Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II
Похожие товары с лучшей оценкой
Wizemart © 2026.
Рекомендательная система по умному выбору товаров по отзывам и рейтингам
