Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II
646 отзывов пользователей o Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II
Пользовались
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
1. Image quality: The best you can imagine. In challenging dark situations, the camera really shines. I took many pictures inside churches and museums, without flash, and they came up impeccable. Even with the zoom they were great. I took pictures at night during a cruise on the Danube in Budapest, and photos of the illuminated city were excellent, even during the moving vessel in a windy night!
2. Battery life: I bought two extra batteries and carried them around, just in case, but I never used them. The battery provided with the camera lasted two days before needing charging, with moderately heavy use.
3. Size and handling: I bought a snug camera case, and I carried it in the front pocket of my shorts or pants. With jeans it was a little too tight for comfort, but possible. Whoever says the camera is not compact enough better use a cellphone instead. The camera is very small and has a slippery grip, so be careful when handling.
4. Controls: I found the controls and menus easy to use, but there are so many options, that I am still learning all the details. The flash is a little flimsy, but very useful. I never used the viewfinder, since the screen was clear enough, even under bright sunlight. The zoom was enough in most situations.
5. Price/value: At $800, the camera is not cheap, and friends were asking me, "$800 for a compact?". However, I believe the quality of the camera is well worth the money and I am very happy with my purchase. Very highly recommended!

Pros:
1. Image quality is the best I've seen on a compact, probably as good or better than my old Sony a55 DLSR.
2. Auto focus is fast and accurate, as long as you're not shooting through a dirty window.
3. The built-in flash is surprisingly powerful.
4. Front control ring multi-function is intuitive and easy.
5. Menus and control layouts are familiar to existing Sony DSLR users.
6. Lens zoom range is very useful, and f/1.8 at the widest end is helpful in low light.
7. Decent low light performance, which includes image stabilization.
8. Small size opens new possibilities for portability, and less intimidating when shooting candids.
9. Pretty good battery life.
10. Solid build and hand feel.
11. Can be charged with any micro-USB cell phone charger
Cons:
1. Manually adjusting shutter speed using the back control ring is a hassle. One false push and you've turned on your flash instead of changing your shutter speed, since the ring serves multiple purposes.
2. Manual focus is difficult, since it's electronic without the feedback you'd get from a regular lens. Focus peaking helps, but the focus magnifier just makes things worse.
3. Auto focus differentiates poorly when shooting through dirty glass, and there's no way to select a focus point, as with a DSLR.
4. Auto WB is not as accurate as I would like, tending to be warmer than necessary.
5. When shooting in auto mode, the camera defaults to higher ISO instead of larger aperture in lower light situations.
6. The images are still somewhat noisy at high ISO, above 800, but acceptable.
7. No GPS
8. Sony Play Memories cellular app is quirky, and you can't access the photos on your phone unless the camera is connected. I have to turn off cellular data on my Samsung GS4 to get the phone to connect, then turn it back on to share a photo, losing the camera connection.
Despite the shortcomings, I'm very happy with the RX100II, mainly because the image quality is just so good for a compact, and while not quite offering the level of control of my a99, it comes pretty close.

The fact that the case was not real leather as the Amazon website suggested, really had no bearing on the subject as the price had implied that it was not leather.
The size of the case is appropriate for larger cameras such as the Sony RX100 Mark 2, but is so large that the LF1 would have been lost inside it - and it would have been such a large lump on the belt that to carry it all the time would have been irksome.
To declare that this case is of a size appropriate for carrying the LF1 is like suggesting that you need a Transit van to carry golf clubs around. This is why I was disappointed.
For the larger cameras it would almost certainly be appropriate and useful, and it seemed well made and thought out with a soft pouch for the camera to fit in, before being placed in the imitation leather pouch shown. It could also be carried on a shoulder strap, which would also have worked, keeping the camera to hand - but was not how I intended to use the item.
The camera, however, is brilliant.

Things I love about this new revision:
-Excellent and very useful EVF. Slides back into Camera when not in use
-Screen can go 180 for self-portraits or to monitor when using video
-Normal Burst Mode shoots good quality
Improvements from the Mark II except for the following:
1) Hot Shoe detachment has been removed. This is a big disadvantage when using the camera for video. I was unable to attach a microphone or light units easily because of this. Sony should integrate the flash into the body (Like the panasonic LF1) and return the Hot Shoe.
2) Lens aperture has been improved, but you lose some telephoto range. While this isn't a huge disadvantage for everyday shooting, it is when you consider you can't remove the lens on this camera.
Things I would like to see:
i) For the amount of money your paying for this camera, it would be a much better value if they changed the lens to a 5x version with either 24-120 or 28-140mm equivalent. There is Sony's Clearzoom that gives you an extra 2x of reach, but I wouldn't go beyond that and use the digital zoom because the image suffers too much.
ii) It would be nice if it was touchscreen
iii)No GPS functions
Don't let this cameras small size fool you. It's a great backup/B Camera that I would consider a professional instrument. I hope Sony addresses some of these issues with the Mark IV or creates a spin-off like the RX100 IC in which you can change out the lenses. I'd love to be able to have a Prime Lens, 28-140 and telephoto I could install. The Nikon 1 V3 is doing this already, but the price is too much right now.


- Great camera, very sharp pictures.
- Fits in your pocket!
- Amazing (revolutionary) amount of light-gathering ability for a camera of this size. (1" sensor)
- The in-camera processing (esp. sharpen/denoise), for the jpg's, seems to be better than what I can get out of Lightroom (from raw).
- Photos beat the heck out of any cell phone camera in existence.
Cons:
- The AWB (auto white balance) is a bit weak, and definitely tends toward cool (rather than warm) renditions of the scene.
- You often have to wait on the memory card to catch up.
- Not as good in low-light as an APS-C or larger sensor, of course, but the quality you do get (in low light) is still pretty astounding for a pocketable camera!
Tips:
- Be sure to buy the FASTEST possible memory card with this. I bought a class 10 SDXC card (90 MB/sec) and even with it, after you take a pic, you often have to wait ~1.0 seconds before you can review it - it'll say "Please wait... writing to memory card." I've never experienced this with other cameras, and I find it pretty annoying.

Image quality is excellent from this camera. I'd go out on a limb and say that this is one of the best cameras that Sony has made to date as far as image quality is concerned. The camera takes well-detailed, colorful photos and is clean through ISO800. But can take respectable pictures through ISO3200 (although noise reduction does kick in at that sensitivity and does smear some fine detail at closer inspection). But the cameras does a better job at balancing out noise, noise reduction, and detail retention at least a stop better than the original RX100. It compares nicely with APS-C DSLRs at low and mid sensitivities. I find the exposure behavior has also improved and the camera is less prone to overexposure when compared to its predecessor. Color output is punchy and contrasty but most colors are reproduced very well. The lens is fairly sharp throughout its entire focal range, although I think the new RX100 III is even sharper at telephoto than the RX100 II is at 70mm.
Please note that I do not do video so I can't really vouch for the quality of it, although the reviews from others have been uniformly positive.
The camera's performance is pretty good. Autofocus speeds are decent in most lighting conditions but the camera does have some accuracy issues in low light. This is one area where the Canon G1X Mark II is a little better. At times, in low light shooting conditions, the camera will not bother to pinpoint the subject you are trying to shoot and just throw a huge box over the whole scene. This is something I have seen with other Sony cameras as well. It's better in this condition to take control of the AF yourself and move the focus point to where you need it. Image stabilization, which was an issue on the RX100, and is mostly rock solid on this model.
I don't understand why Sony is being so block headed about the camera design. More specifically, why there is no indent or grip on the front. This is true of the 3rd gen model as well, which is just about to be released. Luckily the extra Sony grip costs $10-$15 but I consider it essential because the camera is much more comfortable to hold. So if you order this camera, don't order it without the grip.
Despite some design quirks, this camera line from Sony still stands on its own terms of providing big image quality in such a small package.If you don't feel you need the faster lens or the built in EVF, you can save some money and get the RX100 II instead. Don't bother with the original RX100. It's not a bad camera but this 2nd gen model has all the quirks worked out and has even better image quality.

My only complaint so far is the functionality/location of the flash. It is right where you put your left finger to hold the camera with your left hand. This camera is very heavy and I'm afraid that I'll drop it if the flash pops up with my finger sitting there. Just a bizarre design, but I suppose I will get used to it.
One other complaint - the AC adapter that comes with the camera does not provide power to the camera. It charges the battery, yes, but if you plug it in and attempt to review your pics or play with the camera, you can't. If I am paying $600 for a camera, I expect it to come with a slightly better AC adapter! I just found another 5V adapter laying around (from an old cell phone) and I use that and it does provide power.

UPDATE: Sony has corrected the skin softening issue. As far as the barrel shadow is concerned, maybe I was being too picky. Updated from a one star to a 3 star. I still prefer not to own this camera on account of how it feels in hand, just too small and square shaped. It just doesn't feel very secure in my hands, like I'm going to drop it at any given moment. I ultimately went with the Canon G7X which feels 10x more sturdy to me.

replacement that might improve on photos I take of my grandkids as well as a pocket camera to keep on hand on photographic trips when I am principally using a DSLR. I was considering the Fuji X100S and the m3 RX-100 Sony DSC-RX100M III Cyber-shot Digital Still Camera. I decided on the latter, in part because of its smaller size. Having had the RX100m3 for about 3 weeks now, I can say that there are several improvements over the original RX100 which I find useful. First, the electronic view finder really is useful when it is very bright making it hard to see the subject with the LCD. Second, having a wider angle really does help getting more into the picture especially when you are close to the subject. And the improvement in the low light capability when using the telephoto is also appreciated. On the negative side, I did find that the battery did not last as long on a single charge as with the original RX100. Also, I was quite surprised to find that the flash does not automatically pop up even when set on fill flash when you go to shoot your picture as in the original RX100 and stated in the guide to using this camera. Instead one has to manually force the flash to pop up using a very hard to find button. I haven't yet had a chance to try the 120 p video or the built-in WiFi, two additions which I am looking forward to using (when I figure them out, something that is not as straightforward as it sounds and requires a new memory card,a SDXC card, as well as new software). I also do still wonder whether the Fuji X100S would have shown a more remarkable improvement in my pictures.

A lot of advertising material implies that the WiFi feature of this camera will work on smart iPhones with iOS less than 7. But in early February 2015, at about the time I purchased the camera, Sony (and Apple) eliminated that version of the app, and upgraded to one requiring iOS7. My older phone won't do that. I have contacted Sony, twice, and gotten no reply as to where I might obtain the older app, which is still mentioned in the product brochure that comes with the camera.
If you have iOS7, or Android, or don't care about the WiFi, then this does not concern you. Note that Android devices with near-field communictions have an additional capability (not all Androids have this, and currently no iPhones do).
Can't blame Amazon, I contacted them, and they tried to help. But it's not Amazon's problem. I'll keep the camera.

Top 3 favorite things: 1) The crisp clarity of details in the pics, even when cropped. 2) I was very impressed with the auto low light adjustment, whether taken at night or indoors without a flash, the shots from the RX100M II were "night and day" better than I've gotten from any camera, and 3) The macro capability was not only fun but gave that crisp foreground with the blurry background effect. There is so many things with this camera, that I anticipate I will have fun discovering many more bells whistles in it that I don't even know about.
The bundle: All of the products that came in this package were of good quality, and made this a phenomenal deal. I used all of the items just in the first three weeks of my trip, and I expect I will continue to get a lot of use out them since I now favor this smaller camera now over my DSLR.
I've attached a few examples photos; NOTE that the last 4 pics are all cropped from the same photo (5th from the end) to show the level of detail even when cropped more than 75%.



Cons: The viewfinder a little tiny and is not robustly built (may be mine has a problem), it is moving a little in its cradle, after a dslr experience, camera lacks the feel of connection,
if you are tired to carry your heavy dslr to everywhere, and your wife is complaining that you are not taking much photos of the kids as before, go for it.
please keep in mind that that you are purchasing a COMPACT camera (with a near dslr image quality) so you need to refresh your mind if you are an ex dlsr owner. No problem for first timers and compact users
also please do not take into account the battery life, as they all tend to compare with dslrs, which is unfair.

So when she let me know the Sony RX100 M3 did not autorotate when taking a selfie rendered it pointless to me. It's quite difficult to take a selfie, upside down. We tried looking for answers googling it but no one has yet to have this problem. It just may have been the first RX100 M3 that did that. So I took my question to amazon where I received a response immediately from SONY (Thank you!). We tried the suggestion however, it didn't work after factory resetting the camera. The next option would be to send it back to get it fix, but instead decided to have it replaced. I requested a replacement to amazon.com yesterday (Sept. 8th), and to my amazement my friend received it today (Sept. 9th)!!!! I am VERY happy to report, that the second SONY RX 100 M3 works beautifully and auto rotates so quick for selfies!!!
I have used this camera and it captures beautiful pictures fast.
Thank you again amazon.com for an excellent experience and service without any hassle!!!!



I've purchased three of these cameras (first from Sony Store online, second from Sony Store in NYC, and third from Amazon). I can say that the construction varied from one to the next. The first one had a solid EVF that would pop up smoothly and lock into place. However, it had some manufacturing defect on the lens that looked like the glass was scratched on some interior lens element. I returned this one and purchased another. The second one also had this same defect on the same spot of the lens (bottom left as you face the front of the camera). Its EVF didn't lock into place when you popped it up, instead you had to pull it the rest of the way up before you could slide it forward. I returned this camera too because of the lens issue again. The third camera didn't have the issue with the lens, but like the second the EVF wasn't as springy and needed a little help to get all the way up to where you could slide out the eye piece. Otherwise it's fine, and I'm happy with it. I just wish there was more quality control for such an expensive camera.

that being said.. i'm a photographer.. so i like looking through a viewfinder.. so the second I realized this new model had an electronic viewfinder I knew I had to have it. I then soon found out that it shoots video using the the new XAVC S codec which is a 50mb/ps "less compressed" Codec that's been around for a while, but gives canon and nikon a run for their money with their standard super compressed PhotoJpg-compressed-as-fuck video ... that looks amazing under perfect circumstances.. This new model also has a 180 degree LCD which means my wife can FINALLY take those selfies and get them perfect ALMOST every time because she can finally see her own face without shining her cellphone flash into the mirror. Furthermore, this camera has a 24-70mm Lens (compared to the previous.. (im guessing here) 20-110mm lens at f1.8-4.9.. (not guessing about the f-stop on the lens) so on the lens alone, this is a humongous upgrade - in Canon standards this is the difference between a $799 and a $1600 lens.
Anyways, these are the major differences between the 2 cameras. I think the new model is most definitely worth the additional $200, but it's obviously a question of circumstance.
Adam




