Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II
646 отзывов пользователей o Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II
Пользовались
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Cons: The viewfinder a little tiny and is not robustly built (may be mine has a problem), it is moving a little in its cradle, after a dslr experience, camera lacks the feel of connection,
if you are tired to carry your heavy dslr to everywhere, and your wife is complaining that you are not taking much photos of the kids as before, go for it.
please keep in mind that that you are purchasing a COMPACT camera (with a near dslr image quality) so you need to refresh your mind if you are an ex dlsr owner. No problem for first timers and compact users
also please do not take into account the battery life, as they all tend to compare with dslrs, which is unfair.
So when she let me know the Sony RX100 M3 did not autorotate when taking a selfie rendered it pointless to me. It's quite difficult to take a selfie, upside down. We tried looking for answers googling it but no one has yet to have this problem. It just may have been the first RX100 M3 that did that. So I took my question to amazon where I received a response immediately from SONY (Thank you!). We tried the suggestion however, it didn't work after factory resetting the camera. The next option would be to send it back to get it fix, but instead decided to have it replaced. I requested a replacement to amazon.com yesterday (Sept. 8th), and to my amazement my friend received it today (Sept. 9th)!!!! I am VERY happy to report, that the second SONY RX 100 M3 works beautifully and auto rotates so quick for selfies!!!
I have used this camera and it captures beautiful pictures fast.
Thank you again amazon.com for an excellent experience and service without any hassle!!!!
I've purchased three of these cameras (first from Sony Store online, second from Sony Store in NYC, and third from Amazon). I can say that the construction varied from one to the next. The first one had a solid EVF that would pop up smoothly and lock into place. However, it had some manufacturing defect on the lens that looked like the glass was scratched on some interior lens element. I returned this one and purchased another. The second one also had this same defect on the same spot of the lens (bottom left as you face the front of the camera). Its EVF didn't lock into place when you popped it up, instead you had to pull it the rest of the way up before you could slide it forward. I returned this camera too because of the lens issue again. The third camera didn't have the issue with the lens, but like the second the EVF wasn't as springy and needed a little help to get all the way up to where you could slide out the eye piece. Otherwise it's fine, and I'm happy with it. I just wish there was more quality control for such an expensive camera.
that being said.. i'm a photographer.. so i like looking through a viewfinder.. so the second I realized this new model had an electronic viewfinder I knew I had to have it. I then soon found out that it shoots video using the the new XAVC S codec which is a 50mb/ps "less compressed" Codec that's been around for a while, but gives canon and nikon a run for their money with their standard super compressed PhotoJpg-compressed-as-fuck video ... that looks amazing under perfect circumstances.. This new model also has a 180 degree LCD which means my wife can FINALLY take those selfies and get them perfect ALMOST every time because she can finally see her own face without shining her cellphone flash into the mirror. Furthermore, this camera has a 24-70mm Lens (compared to the previous.. (im guessing here) 20-110mm lens at f1.8-4.9.. (not guessing about the f-stop on the lens) so on the lens alone, this is a humongous upgrade - in Canon standards this is the difference between a $799 and a $1600 lens.
Anyways, these are the major differences between the 2 cameras. I think the new model is most definitely worth the additional $200, but it's obviously a question of circumstance.
Adam
I hope this information helps.
This model comes in second to the $7000 Leica for quality and performance in the point & shoot category at 1/10th the price. I got this camera to replace the old Nikon S-8300 for my wife and she's thrilled with the performance and features.
PROS
Excellent high ISO performance. 1-inch image sensor. Wide aperture lens. Customizable controls. Large, tilting LCD. Minimal shutter lag. Raw image capture. Wi-Fi. Hot shoe with EVF support.
CONS
Limited zoom range. In-camera battery charging only. Could be sharper at the edges of the frame at 28mm.
A good camera offering sharp raw images, but still worth comparing to this Fujifilm Camera here: http://amzn.to/1GMlwPO
The problems appear with the build quality. I always keep the camera in the case and i have never let it fall, but after 3 months of casual use the camera shows on every picture a black spot on the top right side. The bigger the F value the more clear spot its visible after
F5.3 its becomes more visible. I read only on how to fix this online and there are several cases reported of a faulty error called dust/oil spots, so mine was on of them so its annoying to remove the spot on every picture I take and on a camera this size its kind of impossible to repair.
Another big inconvinient its the battery indicator its pointless to have one if only show two states full/empty, being empty the shortest state signal you can get on screen and it costs me a 64Gb card cause i was filming video, the Rx100 damage the FAT structure of my SD and made it completly useless, and lost some money on the process.
Legitimate viewfinder, full manual controls, fast lens, fast frame rate (10fps+!) and it's very small and light weight.
It's the camera I've been waiting for since digital cameras came out. (no joke - there isn't another digital camera on the market that comes even CLOSE to offering what the RX100 III does.)
It has officially replaced my Canon 5d3 setup for travel.
Excellent as an underwater camera as well (with use of Nauticam underwater housing, of course).
I received this camera for Christmas. After doing a lot of research, I decided this was the camera I wanted. It worked fine the first day, then I took photos and couldn't understand why there was black shading at the upper right and lower left hand corners of the photo. I discovered that the lens cover was no longer fully opening. I returned the camera to Amazon and received a replacement. I didn't even have 1 good day with the second one! Again, the lens cover does not fully open. I don't want to be putting my fingers on the moving cover to force them open. So, I'm hoping this is not an $800 mistake, as I haven't had the pleasure of seeing what this camera is capable of.
It's an expensive camera, but it takes truly wonderful photos.
I don't really recommend the package deals from Focus, though. Most of the extras are worthless and there is a real question about exactly what Focus is going to send you. The only thing of value to me in the package was the high capacity battery.
I also doubt that the case is actually leather. And it does smell a bit wierd. And the case is too close on the right to allow the USB to plug into the camera with it still in the case - I might shave a millimetre off of the case because that's all it'd take. But...
I'm hoping the smell will fade, the strap's a good length, it protects the camera, it was nicely packaged in a felt type bag with a cleaning cloth and it looks good.
Now as for the photos, this is by far the best compact camera I've ever used. I still use a DSLR for special occasions especially where higher zoom is needed but for all other photo taking I use this. Much more convenient than lugging around a bulky DSLR and still have the confidence that you will get great shots and on par with more expensive DSLRs.
I also purchased a relatively cheap Neewer flash TT560 and this works great with the Sony. Only drawback is that it still tries to use the built-in flash which the external flash blocks from fully popping up. However, this does affect the firing of the external flash. Good for situations where you need a stronger flash. I also have the Neewer 160 LED CN-160 light for video filming indoors and also greatly compliments this sony camera.
But, after using the camera for just a brief time, I realized that I just cannot live with the immensely small (2.9x) zoom. It's even less than the last version. As good as this camera is and as spectacular as the image quality ends up being, the camera is just not practical for me without more optical zoom. It barely zooms which essentially means you have to be right up on your subject which, for me, means missing out on many shots.
I get that Sony made tradeoffs to get such stellar picture quality in such a form factor and my hats off to them for their remarkable advances. But, for me, I realized after using the camera briefly that I'd happily trade slightly less quality for much longer range. Most compact cameras nowadays have outstanding picture quality at longer distances.
I'm sure many will be extremely happy with this camera, and there's a lot to like about it, but it's just not for me.
I didn't even consider taking my D800. Even without its grip and with a 50mm prime, it was too big, too heavy, and too 'there' all the time. I adore the D800, but this was an on-your-feet, strolling in and out of buildings, across quads, and past athletic fields for hours at a time kind of day.
So I bought the RX100M3. Fits right in my pants pocket. Not jeans, but khakis. I'd forget it was there, until I wanted a shot. Then I'd pull it out, get the shot, and tuck it away again.
Plenty of battery life, so I had enough juice for multiple college visits in one day. Including the 'scene setter' shots of the towns they were located in.
At the end of the day, the image quality was excellent. Just plain excellent. It handled a variety of mixed-lighting shots, landscapes, lecture halls, dorm rooms, architecture, and interiors.
My D800 would probably have done better. But for a level playing field I would have had to bring the 24-70mm...which would have excelled. But then? The trips would have been more about the camera than the schools....and that was not what I wanted.
Very happy with this little travel companion.
Start up time is also quick. I find myself use this more often than my iPhone 6 plus. (Though I transfer the photos instantly to my phone then doing some photo editing on my phone before sharing them on social networks.
Totally recommend the RX100 Mark 3 to people who want quality photos but concern about portability with DSLR. Combine this with Adobe Lightroom and I'm sure you'll be pleased.
Pros-
Easy of use, low light capabilities, WIFI and NFC, resolution, viewfinder, display, flash, and almost everything!
Cons-
The camera is a little heavy (but just for a point and shoot), price (but worth it), it is a little big for a point and shoot (but again it takes pictures like a high end camera)
For me this camera is the best of both worlds. It takes high end pictures in a point and shoot size. The greatest thing about this camera is that I do not have to ever connect it to anything. I have a spare battery and a cradle charger, so no plugging it in to charge. I have the NFC and WIFI setup so that I can wirelessly send pictures to any of my computers or phones, so no connecting to transfer photos. That in itself makes the premium price very worthwhile for me.
PS - I bought the Amazon package deal with a memory card and some other extras. As far as I know this product is fixed price point. It is hard to find it for less than retail price.






