Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Nikon D90 Body

I read somewhere that autofocus on the D90 is slow. Maybe those people don't know how to use a camera.Auto focus on this baby is lighting fast. It will shoot all the frames you want in a second, and all of the pictures will be correctly exposed and sharp focused.Is my first DSLR, I had film SLR for years (pentax, Nikon, Canon) I had several digital cameras (Sony, Canon). But this one without any doubts is the best one by far.Thanks Nikon!!

I have had several expensive digital cameras, but this is my first digital SLR. Simply put, I am blown away with how fantastic the pictures are and how easy/intuitive the D90 is to use. I ordered it from Amazon with the 18-200 VR lens for total just under $1500. You don't need an expensive camera to take great pictures, but if you can afford it the D90 is simply outstanding. Worth every penny...

This is an amazing camera! I have been wanting to upgrade to a SLR for a while, and well. I've had this camera for two days, and in total love with it! It's easy to navigate and easy to operate.All in all. A wonderful camera. That anyone will love.

OK, so this is my first digital camera. But having a strong photo experience with previous top of the line film cameras (Nikon F5, Nikon F4 and more) I can say that this camera is truly worthy of the Nikon name. Prepare to be amazed.

This camera does it all- pictures that are so crisp you will think you are seeing it live and then you can video it all too! My husband always loved his Nikon 35mm and wasn't adjusting to the digital world until now. kudos!!!!

Best DSLR I've ever owned. Very quick and easy to manipulate for great photos. It Packs so much features for every situation, and the quick function button makes it easy to control, the most used tasks.In Matter of quality, I shoot at iso 1600 and the photos are very usable and clear.

I've owned this thing for 4 years or so now. Nikon has introduced a few models since then, but this thing is still just about perfect for the picture taking I do. Lots of lens choices, tons of features, ergonomics just fit my hands like I designed it for myself. I've looked at the newer stuff, and for the few things they've "improved" on, I still think this was and is the best fit for me. Only reason I could ever see moving it to second camera status is if I ever decide to go full frame. I'd love too, but tough to justify the price when this D90 does such a fine job even with the reduced sensor size.Here's some points to consider if looking at one of these to buy. Its a 12.3 megapixel camera. Smallish by recent new cameras, but more than enough to print very nice pictures 11x14 or larger in some cases. If you are using it for 4x6, you will have excellent results. The camera does shoot HD video, but it is limited to the 720, it will not shoot 1080. In my experience, autofocus during video shoots leaves something to be desired. The camera, with the kit lens, 18-105, has very decent low light capabilities. Of course, the kit lens is slow, so a faster lens would improve low light capabilities. On a nice bright day, without using flash, the camera pops off 4.5 or 5 frames a second. I have used this camera a lot at the drag strip and have captured lots of great wheelie action using the continuious shooting. My daughter was also a polevaulter, and this feature allowed me to catch lots of great action shots as she went up and over the bar. I used it a few times, indoors, for high school basketball, with the 18-105 lens, it was slow and not so great. With a faster lens, excellent results indoors shooting action shots. The camera itself has lots of choices to select the type and heat range of the lighting you're shooting in, so great results are possible with incandesent, florescent, halogen, sunlight, moonlight, you name it, the camera can shoot in it.There are quite a few in camera editing functions to correct, um, operator error. LOL. Camera shoots in both color and black and white. There are various settings which allow quit, low grade snapshots, fine picture quality, and up to RAW settings. RAW allows, actually demands, that you have computer capabilities to edit the photos. RAW prints cannot be processed at your local Wal-Mart. The detail possible and editing possible in RAW is unbelievable. Be forewarned tho, RAW eats up lots of storage on your SD cards. There is an option to shoot both fine and RAW at the same time, which allows easy printing of the fine, and the capability to edit and change appearances in the RAW format.This camera has an internal focusing motor for the autofocus lens'. Nikon 3000 series does not have this feature. What does this mean? Not all lenses will autofocus on a 3000, where practically all autofocus lenses will function on the D90. There is also an auto/manual switch on the camera body which allows you to manually focus any lens attached to the camera if you desire more control than the autofocus feature allows. Speaking of lenses, the mounting design Nikon is using has been around since the late 70s. This means that some really nicely made Nikon lenses that you may have laying around from the 80s or 90s have a really good chance of working great on the D90. In the first part of my review, where I give my personal likings of the camera, I mention its a reduced sensor camera. This sorta works to your benefit. The reduced sensor has a multiplying effect on the lens rating. This is approximately 1.5 times. So, a 100mm lens on a D90 is equivalent to a 150mm lens on a full framed camera. 400mm is equal to 600mm, and so on.The camera has a nice large screen on the back to select options in the cameras menu. You can also change to live view which allows the screen to function as the eye piece. The screen is stationary, it does not tilt, swivel, flip, etc. Using it in live view also slows down the reaction of the shutter a bit. On top of the camera is a small simple screen that shows many of your settings at a glance. Using the small screen and function buttons you can switch shot quality, ISO, check battery charge, number of shots taken and number remaining on card, F stop, flash, etc.The camera also has two dials in very well placed positions. A front dial right below the shutter release, and a rear dial behind the shutter release. These dials do quite a few things, such as changing ISO, flash, and using both front and rear dials, you can change F stops and shutter speeds without pushing any other buttons first. So, for those desiring manual operation instead of auto, everything is very easy to change while looking through the eyepiece.The camera has a pretty decent built in flash and the capability of adding external flash attachments.In this review, I've only touched on a fraction of this cameras capabilities. I highly recommend this camera if you can get ahold of one new or used.

I am a photography teacher in NYC and online. (See my Amazon profile for my website.) I teach beginner and intermediate photography students every week. I've also been a professional photographer for the last five years with images published in The New York Times, GQ, New York Magazine, Women's Wear Daily, The New York Observer, The Village Voice and Time Out New York.(This review is for beginner photographers.)If you're a beginner, you're most likely asking yourself: Nikon or Canon? Really, I feel confident in saying that you can't go wrong with either. I've used both brand's cameras extensively and find that they both offer amazing image quality with well-built, solid cameras that, if taken care of, will last decades. There are two differences between the cameras, though, that can be taken into consideration.The user-interface: If cameras were computers, Nikons would be PCs and Canons would be MACs. PCs are built for people not afraid of technology whereas Macs are built for people who want things super-easy. Nikons excel at customization options which means you'll see so many more options with the Advanced features of a Nikon than you will with a Canon. Canons, on the other hand, excel at ease-of-use for beginners. Canons offer less advanced options and can be easier to learn on. This can be frustrating down the line, though, once you've learned a lot about photography. At that point you may want all of the options that Nikon offers and be frustrated with your Canon. If you're someone who really likes to delve deep into your hobbies or if you're intent on becoming a professional photographer, I'd say a Nikon would be your best bet. If you're someone who wants to learn the basics of photography and only imagine yourself being a hobbyist, Canon would be a better option for you.Where Nikon excels: Flash photography. I often find myself in situations where I'm shooting event photography (weddings, movie premiers, benefits and galas) where I need to use a lot of flash. For this kind of photography, I'll always prefer to be shooting with a Nikon. Nikon's flash metering (how the camera magically decides how much light to fire out of the flash) is much more consistent than Canon's. You can take a Canon and shoot the same scene three times in a row with flash and all three images will be at different brightness levels. You can do the same thing with a Nikon and all three images will be wonderfully the same. If you're somebody who plans on shooting a lot with flash (indoor photography, event photography, etc.) you'll want to consider going with Nikon.Where Canon excels: Richness of colors. I've been in numerous situations where I've been on the red carpet taking the exact same picture as the photographer next to me. I'll have a Canon and the person next to me will have a Nikon. This has provided quite a few opportunities to compare the images side-by-side. What I've found is that the colors on the Canon's images look richer and make the image pop more. If I'm doing fine art photography (anything I'd like to someday hang in a gallery), I'll always want to be shooting with a Canon for this reason.If you're set on Nikon, there are three cameras you should be considering and it all comes down to what your budget is:D7000 $1,400 without lensD5100 $750 without lensD3100 $600 only available with lens(current prices as of 2/19/11)Since you're on the D90 Amazon page, though, I'm going to guess that you're considering the D90 which Amazon is currently selling for $900 (without lens). If you're considering buying the D90 because you didn't realize that Nikon has replaced the D90 with two new camera models (the D5100 and D7000), then you may want to go straight for one of those two models, depending on your budget. If you were already aware that Nikon has newer models and are still considering the D90 then here's how the D90 stacks up to the D5100 and the D7000. (The D90 is such a great camera that, even though Nikon has newer, replacement models, they still sell the D90!)D90 vs. D7000:Where the D7000 excels:-Higher resolution: The D7000 is a 16 MegaPixel camera whereas the D90 is only a 12 MegaPixel camera. This effects how big you can print your images and have them remain high quality prints. 16 MegaPixels will print as big as 24 inches by 16 inches whereas 12 MegaPixels will print as big as 21 inches by 14 inches. A higher resolution also means you can crop an image and have the remaining image still remain high quality.-Longer battery life. The D7000's battery will last 20% longer than the D90's.-Two memory card slots. This is really a cool feature. The D7000 has two memory card slots which means you'll be less likely to find yourself standing in front of a gorgeous scene with no more memory left.-More focus points. When using auto-focus, the D7000 will have an easier time focusing on what you want it to focus on.-Faster continuous shooting. If you're often shooting sports or any fast moving subject, continuous shooting

Hello to all. I'll try not to duplicate what everyone covered excellently already.This cameras days I suspect are numbered making a terrific buy today. With the D5100 and the D7000, around both outstanding camera values. Even saw a 2 lens D5100 bundle at SAMs Club for only $899.00! I think the is a better buy today.Ok, then why did I go with the D90 then instead of the cameras mentioned above? The Legacy in the title says it. my older Nikon lenses have the requirement of the body autofocus lens drive. Meaning the lens itself does not have a motor in it at all. My prime f1.8 50mm for instance, and my 70-300mm. I don't want to buy newer glass. So with the D90, I can have my cake and eat it too.I wanted to get in on the CMOS imager here, my D200 and D40 which I love in direct sun and plentiful indoor light is a chromatic noise festival in lower light! It kept driving me nuts. Using noise reduction programs and losing detail. The D90 just doesn't have that problem. I agree with another reviewer here about usable images to 1600 ISO no problem at all. My D200 is way noisier at this range, my D40 a little better than my D200.Another big benefit is battery life. Outstanding battery life. After a full day of shooting, the battery was only a quarter used. I am wondering if the battery grip I ordered is really needed since the battery performance so outstanding. My D200 in contrast with battery grip would almost consumed both batteries! CMOS is so much more efficient than CCD. My D40 is better than my D200, but still really lags behind the D90 in battery life. It doesn't sound like a big deal, but having juice for that one shot, it is confidence inspiring knowing you'll get shot no problem.I am also a white balance and color nut. Most cameras have so so performance in this area around specific light like incandescent or fluorescent lighting. The D90 isn't perfect, but it pulls ahead of my D200 and D40 in accuracy. My long time favorite was my Olympus E10. Pitiful in just about anything vs. today, it just gets the color and white balnce so right. If I can take my sweet time, I still love using this old classic. The D90 is close, but I find a bit of tuning here and there with the comprehensively easy white balance setup along with bracketing, and I am a happy camper.It is in the everyday life this camera will supplant my other cameras. The polycarbonate body fits my hand and is well balanced. The controls so logical, I am at home really being already a Nikon fan since my first D70s. My brother uses that camera now and loves it.The D90 reminds me so much what I love about photography. Being there for the moment. Set it to auto, or program and compose and compose for that perfect image. Or go at it full manual. The command and sub command dials like my D70 make it just so easy. Shutter and aperture at your finger tips right now. Would have liked to have instant ISO control like my D200, but that Is no big deal. This camera is small enough almost like my D70 and D40, and light, unlike my D200, I can carry it all day with or without the battery grip with confidence.Outdoor shots in my woody environs or taking pictures of the balloons that fly by my place help me realize the relaxed and beautiful place I live and the D90 makes it so fun to share. everything about the D90 even the quirky movie mode is fine with me. I even had some fun with the rolling shutter malady and made my scary lousy short feature in HD. Making lemonade out of lemons I say.I do believe the D90 is a long term keeper for me. All the right metrics are here.1. Ease of use due to control layout and intuitive menus.2. Lens motor drive in body for your favorite non motor nikkor lenses.3. Low light performance is the best I have had ever with usable images to 1600 or more ISO.3. Light polycarbonate body is mostly all I need in day to day shooting. My Hee Man D200 soldiers on for more inclement conditions4.battery life is outstanding. A full day shooting no problem with the D90 with a single stock battery.5. Overall image quality and balance is great. I find myself more involved in composition than worrying about the D90 unlike my other Nikons. My Olympus E10 though a relic today, still gives me that confidence as long as I am not in a hurry.So overall the D90 delivers much, while sold at low prices today. If you have a need for a Nikon body that can do it all with built in lens drive for your non motor nikkor glass, the D90 will please no end and will meet or exceed your expectations. It did for me.Thank you your time. P.s. I realize that my review, more commentary is lacking the comprehensiveness of others. I just don' t want to cover again what already has been done so well. Though I did want to share because there are users that may have a similar situation and find the D7000 too dear, and the D5100 not an option. The D90 is the only new Nikon you can buy that for a short time I suspect meets those gates and much more. V.C.

While this camera is getting old (I've had mine for 4 years and it was hardly new then), and it's megapixel count is low by today's standard, don't let that fool you. The D90 has been a great and reliable camera for me. I have shot thousands of picture and have yet to have any issues with its quality. Like any DSLR, the pictures you get often depend mostly on the user and somewhat more on the glass than on the body itself. When looking at the body, look at the features, functionality, and ergodynamics first. All of those I love. While I'm planning on upgrading to an FX frame in the near future, I intend to keep my D90 as a back up or lighter option when needed.The most important feature on the D90 compared to modern entery level DSLRs in the same price range, in my opinion, are the manual dials. This allows the photography to make quick and easy adjustments when in a manual mode without pulling the view finder from your eye. Newer similarly priced DSLRs have regulated all of these tools to the LCD menus. While this can suffice for many people, if you are like me and want a quick way to adjust settings when shooting, the D90 is wonderful.

This is an older model, but still meets my expectations, I don't mind the video capabilities on an DSLR so I don't care much about the 720 hd resolution.The 12 mp is another thing I don't mind, I have printed up to 12x18 without a problem, I'm no pro photographer so I don't think I'm going to be doing larger prints, and as I always shoot raw o don't think I'm going to have problems if I try to print a little bigger.The iso settings are not that great as nowadays cameras, but still the dynamic range and low light pictures are good to me, I try to take at iso 1600 max, maybe at3200 from time to and still get good results.Overall this is a good camera, and very cheap too if you buy it new, compared to the entry level, the 3000 series, even the 5000 series, I think this is a best camera, I'd only consider others if I wanted other stuff like the wifi connectivity or the gps integrated into the 5300, or maybe the panorama thing un the 3300, consider also that this camera can use older lensesin aauto focus mode, so I don't caretoo much aabout those other things, this is still a good capable camera that for me has better quality that today's entry level ones.

Everything about the D90 was perfect except for the fact that when I received it, the serial number tab on the bottom was missing. Al the seller did was apologize. I could not register my nikon for insurance purposes because of that. But other than that, the dslr works perfectly. I will be upgrading in about a year or so but until then, I highly recommend this camera to the beginner, hobbyist, amateur, and the photographer who is ready to transition to the realm of being a professional. Please be sure to visit my website at [...]

I have been using this camera for over a year now and I cannot be happier with it. Let me start out by saying that prior to this camera I used to use a Canon SLR. The Canon definitely took great pictures, but the Nikon D90 does a better job! Now onto the review:Build Quality: The overall build quality of this camera is very strong. The case is sturdy and feels like a professional camera. I think the design is comfortable to use and it has rubber in the right places to keep control of the camera while shooting.Image Quality: As many know image quality with SLR also relies on the lenses, with the right lenses the quality is really amazing. The kit lenses are a great place to start and give you a wide range of uses. I picked up a few prime lenses(fixed focal length) and I was really amazed with the quality of pictures this camera produced.Video Quality: I have only used the video feature a few times and the quality I noticed from my limited use was good.Ease of Use: This camera had a small learning curve, after taking several hundred pictures I was able to really get the hang of how to use this camera. I was able to find several tricks to make my images better. I am far from a professional photographer, but I have had several years of experience with SLR cameras. This has been the best camera that I have used thus far. One major piece of advice is that you should definitely read the manual and watch some videos to get yourself acquainted with all of the features of this camera.Recommendation: I would recommend this camera to all levels of amateur photographers, you will definitely love the quality of the images and the ease of use.

I purchased this to give my D80 a rest or to have my D80 as a back up. I don't regret this purchase. It does what I want it to do and I like small dslr cameras (I am a traveling professional). I have other DSLR cameras but I usually use these even with weddings (weight reasons and size). It's better for mobility and endurance.

This camera was my first foray into the world of digital SLRs after many years of film photography. I have owned this camera since 2007 and it has not let me down. I choose it over other popular Nikon's at the time for a few reasons. I had been looking at the D300 and this seemed to be a superior camera in every way. It's lighter, has the same or better image quality, and has all the features you could ask for. While it is not a full frame SLR (and that is something on my wish list) it does take wonderful photos. I have used it for weddings, engagement and maternity portraits as well as some event photography. It has a good battery life, but I do always carry a backup just in case. I enjoy being able to continue shooting without having to worry about changing film. A large memory card is highly recommended with this camera. It has the ability to shoot high quality JPEG, RAW, or both at the same time. My loyalty to Nikon for many years has not wavered and they didn't let me down with this camera. I'll be sticking with them for years to come.

By now everyone knows this camera takes marvelous photographs and not too good video. So if you want a camera with 5 year ago technology at less than half the price, this camera is for you.If you want great video, get ready to pay for newer technology.

Some times this camera misses pixels and when your going back to edit you can clearly see a missing pixel or three i miss my Nikon D3100. Why is this one more expensive you ask. well its probably because of the lens which is pretty good the lens is great but tech of this cam could use a few improvement when it comes to shooting against black backdrops other then those minor details the camera is great and i wouldn't want to dis persuade anyone from buying it . it is definitely a great but but Nikon has this issues with some of its cameras some times just pointing that out its not the first time I've come across this problem when using a Nikon.

This is by far not my first nikon. I still have a d80 and another d90, I love the camera and have been shooting with Nikon for 40 years. However, I have only had this one for 9 months under fairly light use and it is malfunctioning. Shutter speed would not increase and the speed frames per second would not function at all. My other D90 sensor malfunctioned and had to be repaired as well.. this is getting old.

This camera is a piece of junk. We had it less than a year and had to return it twice to be fixed. And now that the warranty is up, it is not working again. Yesterday I took one picture with it and when I tried to take another one (after many attempts to get the darn thing to work) nothing happened.