Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Nikon D90 Body

This is a very good all-around camera. Having been a photographer for over 35 years, I'm dazzled by the shooting options and controls digital cameras offer. The D90 is good in that respect. I'd like to see a little better build quality. It feels pretty solid, but not up to the old F series. The ergonomics are good, but you have to be able to arrange your fingers in ways that make me wonder if I'm accidentally flashing a gang sign to manipulate some of the functions (I'll keep my head down). Image quality is very good, although my D40X that I retired in order to get this camera, was just as good at low ISO. It IS a LOT better at high ISO. For me, 1600 looks very good. 3200 is...not so hot (perhaps I'll learn some Lightroom corrections that will improve it). Shooting performance is quick and crisp. I haven't completely figured out the autofocus modes and what works for what situation. I wish all these cameras had screens that were better at manual focus. The auto bracketing functions are really cool, but not special to this camera...they all seem to have that now. I bought this camera so I could use more lenses (the D40X had no internal autofocus motor). When I attach my 85mm f/1.8, magic happens. I shoot business and civic events, business portraiture, copy artwork, and a lot of stage stuff...music, dance, theater. The D90 seems to do a very good job and should make me money.

The D90 is a great camera for novices and seasoned photographers alike. It is fairly easy to use, and has a full-auto setting for newer photographers, or lazy ones. The stock lens is decent, but nothing to write home about. It's handy to have around for sporting events where the zoom and auto-focus comes in handy. The video is great, but it's not HD. It doesn't really make a difference to me, but if it makes a difference to you consider getting a Flip HD.Since I bought this camera, I have recommended it to 3 friends who have also bought it and loved it. They each had kids and got the photography bug - you know the type.My honest recommendation for the D90 is to buy an old school 50mm fixed focal length lens (you can find these easily for $40 or less). The picture quality is gorgeous, and running on full-manual is the best way to get the most out ofan DSLR in my humble opinion. You obviously need to know some photography basics, but don't let that scare you - photography can be as simple or as difficult as you make it.If you're looking for a high-end camera, look into full-frame DSLRs ($2500+). If you don't know what that means, you don't need it.If you're looking for a great mid-price range camera that will last years and fulfill just about all of your needs - the D90 comes highly recommended!

Don't want to add what is already here. First of all, buy this camera instead of buying D5100 (I know the picture quality is better in D5100 due to improved sensor as of D7000) for same price. The control and bottoms are very handy and I am able to get good quality photo faster than D5000 or D5100. The motor in camera enables you to use autofocus feature in old lens. If you have money, go for D7000 which does everything as of D90, but produce better quality photo with some more control in camera (customize mode, two cards). If you don't have money, go for D3100.

I purchased the D90 with the 18-105 lens kit and also purchased the Nikkor 50mm f/1.8 lens as well. I purchased a Sandisk 8GB extreme (30 MB/s) card, the 5M dollar home, and a lens Pen. Setting up the D90 was very easy (<5min). Using the 50mm lens, I took a handful of pictures using the "Auto" setting. The clarity and color of the pictures is remarkable. We have a Nikon P90 which does not do well at all inside our house where we have mostly recessed lighting, but the D90 took perfect pictures in every situation. Autofocus was extremely fast. Next, I switched the camera to the "Aperture Priority" mode so I could control the amazing aperture range that the 50mm f/1.8 lens has to offer. The results were astounding. In low light settings I was able to take beautiful pictures of my kids in action for the first time. I have only scratched the surface of what the D90 is capable of but I am very satisfied. I also appreciate the D90's construction. It feels very solid and the grip has a very secure feel to it. The cameras pentaprism design translates to a crystal clear and bright viewfinder, making it easy to compose pictures in low light settings. The LCD screen is also sharp and beautiful. I can't say enough good things about the D90.

This is an amazing camera in terms of picture quality. I am coming up from a Canon Rebel XS and decided to go to nikon because of the low light capabilities that i heard about, and they all turned out to be true. With the rebel i was luck to get a usable picture out of ISO 400 but on this i am able to jack it up to 1600 and still be perfectly happy.The problem is with the connections between the camera and the lens. For some reason it is not as tight as possible and this can cause a lot of errors while you are shooting. From a simple F-- error to the dreaded Err error i have experienced it all. I have not returned it because i was able to fix it for now with a simple lens rotation or two to help establish the connection better. If you read the reviews on here you can see that this happens to a lot of people. For the longest time this was the flagship of the Nikon Prosumer bodies and for so many to have these problems is weird that they would continue to send these cameras on the market with fixing them.

I love my d90 but I have been desperately trying setting up my opteka remote rft 40 with this camera, does anyone know or can give me some pointers? Thanks

Coming from a D40, D90 is another world ......I was trying to buy the D7000 in place, but I read a lot reviews online, many D7000 leaking oil, and other problems .... backfocusingI'm just an amateur, so do not need high ISO handling (still ).....I bought the D90 body only with a 70-300mm lens.Now I am looking some money to buy flash units compatible with CLS .....!Greetings from Venezuela .....

I was skeptical what the D90 had to offer over my D80 but I can't say I was completely surprised by the advancements having read up on both cameras. I only consider myself a novice photographer that wants to progress so naturally the first camera I started with was the D80. I had great success with it and had a hard time letting it go when it came to sell it. I turned right around and purchased the D90 body with the profits and I upgraded my 18-55mm to the 18-55VR to get a little extra for lower light situations. The first thing that struck me was the display. The D80 display always made it tough to visually see how the picture would turn out when displayed on a computer for editing. The D90 display is much better and gives a much better visual to check exposure and clarity. The image quality is a step up from the D80 as well. I was impressed. That's all I really have to offer on the subject. If you're a D80 owner and thinkng about taking a step up, the D90 is everything the D80 has and a little bit more. Worth the cost of an upgrade.

Amazing camera to use, fantastic results. Makes my D40 look very tame. Given me so much more confidence in trying new shots etc

I am a photo enthusiast and have previously been shooting with a Nikon D50. I enter this review with mixed feelings. I received my Nikon D90 around Jan 4th this year and was instantly amazed with its ability. Because of my previous experience with the D50, it did not take long to get accustom with the D90 and was quite surprised at the ease of familiarizing myself with the new camera. I did try to read up as much as possible because I feel that is the most importand thing to do in photography, knowing your camera inside and out. For the first two weeks, I would say it performed beautifully,as expected. However shortly there after I began noticing pictures that were grossly underexposed speradically through a shoot. I shoot sporting events indoor with various lighting. Here are my usual settings. ISO-1600 to 2000 with High ISO NR on,WB-K at various settings depending on lighting, burst and single exposure modes, AF area mode-Dynamic area,Center focus point-wide,Meter-Center weighted. I shoot approximately 200-400 photos over a period of about 3 hours with several breaks throughout the session. Photos in question are almost completely backed out but look as though they are very underexposed with just hints of the subject on the outer edges. These photos will be scattered about the shoot so it has been very difficult to pinpoint exactly what might be going on to cause this but I have been very surprised with that this is happening. The last session, I had about 25-30 of these misshots in a little over 400 photos. The Customer Service Dept. has been very gracious and helpful to try to resolve this problem and after talking to Nikon USA and Amazon Support, I have a new camera being shipped as a replacement. I am very pleased with this as I feel like it is a defect with the camera and did not feel like this problem should be showing up this soon. The D50 never has had any problem like this but it does not have the setting capability that the D90 has, so I will not try to compare their performances. I hope the problem is with this particular camera and not the model. I am a Nikon fan and will continue to be but this is a discouraging chapter in my history with Nikon products. I will certainly update my review and star rating after I have had a chance to use the new camera.

I Would strongly recommend D90. Though this camera is released long back, the performance of this DSLR is quite OUTSTANDING. The picture quality is really awesome.( It appears better than 16 MP low end DSLRs). I would say all beginners and intermediate photographers can try this DSLR. This has many features and capable of producing great pictures.I bet you, you'll never disappoint if you decide to buy this DSLR.Cheers,Giri

I received a D90 kit with the 18-105 lens a few months ago as a wedding present. It is a wonderful upgrade from my aging D70. My camera's aperture lever broke after only a few weeks and I had to send it back in to Nikon for repairs. It is working perfectly now.Some thoughts:VideoDon't buy this camera for it's video features. D7000 has better video capabilities, and in my opinion, the small Canon S90 and S95 even eclipse this camera for video.Lenses:The kit lens that comes with this camera is mediocre at best. The only positive I can say about it is that it has an excellent focal range. If I was to buy a new D90, I would skip out on the kit and use the money I saved to get some better lenses. Consider what you want to shoot before you buy lenses.For me, it was the 35mm f/1.8 G. This lens stays on my camera body about 90% of the time and is a great walk-around normal lens with excellent low light performance. That leaves you with about $125 to put towards another lens.I bought a 55-200 VR as well... although not as nice as some of the 70-300 lenses, I have had no regrets from my purchase.Some other recommendations would be the discontinued 24-85 f/3.5-4.5 AF-S G for an all in one lens or the more expensive 16-85 AF-S G if you need a wider lens. They can be found used for around $450 if you look in the right places and produce better images than the kit lens.

After trying the D3100 & D5100 and months of research, I finally opted for the D90. VERDICT: I LOVE IT. I'm not professional and will probably never even be called an enthusiast (although I am enthusiastic about photography), but it is perfect for my daily use.In my book, the only minus against D90 vs D3100/D5100 is weight. I hear video isn't as good, but I have no plans of using my DSLR for video.

Thank you for selling this camera with only body option. So I also bought the lens seperately which one I need. Price is also reasonable. Nothing need to say about the product it self of course :)

There are so many choices even if you are restricted to one brand like I am to nikon (because of the lenses) - In all my reasearch, the D90 came up to be the best value for Money - in terms of semi professional standards though the Pixel count is lower than the D3100 and D5100.The pictures are just incredible with 50 mm fixed lenses and it is really a question of how good the cameraman is rather than the camera. You cannot go wrong with this, if you are lucky with a used one - if I were to buy a new one, I might still choose the D7000

IM VERY HAPPY WITH MY NIKON D 90 AND THE SELLER THE SHIPPEMENT EVERYTHING WAS JUST LIKE THEY SAID EXELENT CHOISE, IT TOKE FOR ME A WHILE TO READ A LOT OF SELLERS BUT THIS WAS MY EXELENT CHOICE LOVE IT THANK YOU

We bought the D90 to replace an aging D100, we also own a D300. I would HIGHLY recommend everyone considering a D300 take a look at the D90 as it does EVERYTHING either of us need to doand at a much lower price. I love the D300, if I had to replace it the D90 would have to be a serious contender given the huge price difference. The sensor and image capturing capabilities are identical to the D300. while the D300 allows much more customization and pre-set configurations, we find that we rarely use them. The nice little 18-105 VR zoom is also pretty nice for the price.BTW purchase the $9.99 Amazon branded remote trigger while you're at it. NL-L3 Nikon replacement! One more thing, this camera has a 100% automatic, point and shoot setting so you can hand it to your mother and just show her the shutter release, even pops up the flash if needed. HD video capable too! (I don't really do videos tho)

If you are considering buying this camera, do not think too much. It is an EXCELLENT camera. It is not big but feels solid and, most important, it is so well built! it is and feels like a pro camera. It is light but very well balanced, therefore, a large lens such as the 70-200 fits it well; obviously, in this particular set up, the lens centers the weight. I use the live-view all the time to frame my pictures best. I seldom use the "video" or the sound recording. It has great things such as the sensor cleaner that could be programmed. I have lots of photographer friends who keep a D90 as their main camera. Beginners need to know that It takes time to learn to operate this camera it is not an aim and shoot type of camera. You will need a lot of pictures taken before you feel comfortable with your D90.

Great entry level camera for a the enthusiastic armature. Easy enough to use right out of the box with enough features to keep you interested an exploring the cameras capabilities. Note that the DX sensor produces a digital crop 1.5x (this explains it better than I ever will [...], but if you are looking at an entry level price range for DSLR digital crop is unavoidable. Very happy, will recommend this camera to anyone.

I've been using a point and shoot camera for about 5 years now - I'm by no means a photographer, just an average dad trying to take some pictures. My son recently turned one and I've been finding it more and more difficult to capture those precious moments. I press the button on my point and shoot....delay...missed the shot. Also whenever I take photos indoor I've found they are always blurry or noisy, just not very good. So I elected to get a Digital SLR camera - wow they are expensive! I did very extensive research before making the most important decision. Which one do I get??? I decided to narrow my search to Canon and Nikon, the two top brands. I was considering the Canon Xsi, Canon 40D, and Nikon D90. I quickly decided the Xsi was not for me. On paper it looks great. It has a ton of great reviews and I'm sure it takes amazing pictures. The price was the cheapest of all the cameras I was considering. After visiting Best Buy and actually trying the cameras out the xsi felt like a toy compared to its big brother the 40D. Also the kit lens was very disappointing as far as zoom capabilities. I did like the 40D a lot. The body seems really solid and well build (even more so than the D90). I loved the 6fps rapid shooting (although I can't imagine I would every really need to shot quite that fast). The kit lens seems like a huge improvement over the wimpy one on the xsi. The camera seemed good to me but after picturing my wife using it, it seemed just a tad to "big and heavy". Some people might disagree. The D90 had a few features that really appealed to me. One of the main things I really liked about the D90 was the beautiful 3" VGA screen for reviewing. This screen was a big reason why I went with this camera over the Canon models. It's the same size but has 4 times the resolution. Why would you care about this? It's just really nice when you take a shoot you can immediately tell if you got it or not. With the canons I found you had to either zoom in or download to the computer before you could really tell if the photo came out well. The D90 also just had a lot of other tricks up its sleeve that I thought were nice. There is a HDMI output to hook this baby up to your fancy HDTV. The camera also has built in software that creates an animated slideshow of your pictures for viewing on the TV. Again, doesn't really effect image quality but it's a cool feature. There's also some neat post processing you can do right on the camera including red eye removal, black and white filter, or tilt the picture if you accidentally took it at a slight angle. Of course there is the movie mode also (lack of auto focus makes this feature a little disappointing actually). One final selling point for the D90 over the 40D was the kit lens. For me the kit lens is very important because I don't really plan on purchasing a bunch of different lenses and swapping them out all the time. I just want a decent "all purpose" lens. The 40D's 28-135mm kit lens just felt a little to "zoomed-in" for me. After playing with it I wanted to be able to zoom out more but was unable to. The D90's 18-105 feels like a pretty good range for me (keep in mind that these cameras have a 1.5 multiplier built in). The best advice I can give is to go try the cameras out before you order one. Just go with the one you feel most comfortable with, trust your gut. I've been very happy with my D90 but I'm sure all of the cameras I was considering would have been a huge step up from a point and shot.UPDATE 12/3/12Still really happy with this camera. It takes amazing pictures and has held up very well. I would buy it again no questions asked.

First off I want to say that I have used this camera for a year now. I am a semi pro, which means I earn a little on the side with photography. I also upgraded from a D50 to this camera. I originally wanted to upgrade to the D300 but for the price and what I use it for I decided to go with the D90. Almost the same sensor and I really didn't need the tank build of the 300. The weather proofing would have been nice though.So far I have been very pleased with my choice. The low light capability up to 3200 iso is fantastic. 6400 is pushing it though. It focuses quickly in lowlight. The body fits comfortably in my hand without it feeling too small like the D40/60/5000. It may feel a bit small if you have large hands though. The battery life compared to my D50 is fantastic. The battery, however, is a bit slower to get out if I need to change quickly. You actually have to pull it out instead of it sliding out practically on it's own. The display in the back is awesome. It may actually be too bright though. I have done alot of Fight promo shots on black backrounds where it's hard to use the histogram to see if your lighting is right. On the display they looked good. Once downloaded I had to boost the exposure by as much as 1 stop. I really can't review the jpg setting as I always shoot in RAW. As far as RAW goes, I read a post on here where someone complained that all his software didn't support the new raw format. No need to buy new software, just download a small file from the Nikon website that allows compatibility with most software. The adobe site has it also. I LOVE the "My Menu" feature.As far as the video goes. If you are buying this camera for videoing, don't. It's a nice little gimmick and can be convienient to use in some instances, but it's not a video camera. If you want to video, buy a video camera.I have had a few problems with this camera. The most annoying is when it just stops working because it thinks no lens is attached. I have really only had this problem with my Tamron lenses and can't remember it happening with the Nikons. It was easily fixed by unseating then reseating the lens. I have also lost autofocus with the Tamrons and it was fixed in the same way. When you are actually working with a client this can be both embarassing and annoying. This is the biggest reason I gave this camera only 4 stars.Bottom line is this is a fantastic camera for both beginners and advanced photographers. [...]

Had this for two years now and even though it's being phased out, I'd still keep it and won't be upgrading for a while, It serves me well and I've never had any single issue/problem with this camera, I love using it for landscape, portraits and macros. Awesome camera!

Picked up the camera when it first came out, and over 15,000 shutter releases later (according to my EXIF photo data), I couldn't be happier with this purchase.Ergonomics: First, the camera has enough weight to it and curves to your hand to just feel solid when you are holding it. After playing around with settings, buttons, wheels, and walking through the manual to read up on everything, I slowly became competent at getting my camera into the right setting for the shot with one hand.Pictures: The low light performance at ISO 3200 is incredible, and combined with the 4.5FPS mode, I've nailed some awesome pics at evening football games from the stands. The pre-set color settings, and built in editing (mostly crop & straighten) definitely speeds up my post-production. The Autofocus took a while to master (center, zone, 3D), but works well now that I have the hang of it. My friends and colleagues are blown away by my shots, but that's more a result of getting some direction on composition from friends and doing lots of culling of the bad ones.Video: Manually refocusing a video mid-shot is a pain. The contrast/brightness/white balance adjustments mid-video can get a bit odd as well. It is a bit rough, but can still produce some nice results if you have a unipod, and not a ton of motion with your subjects. For the most part, video has just been a toy, as I haven't attempted anything serious with it. My $180 Canon SD780IS does better job overall with video, but I can't put a f/1.8 on that, and play around with the focus to get a neat hollywood effect.Lenses/Extras: The lens selection for Nikons is nice (have since picked up a 50mm f/1.8, and a 55-200mm VR to go along with the kit 18-105mm, but envy the Canon 55-250mm IS lens at its similar price point to the nikon 55-200mm VR), and the auto-focus performance on the kit 18-105mm lens is pretty fast. The SB-400 was a nice addition (lets me bounce light for indoor shots and get some good results), but using my f/1.8 without a flash has been a better low light solution, even though the color requires more retouching. In retrospect I would have gotten the D90 with the Nikkor 18-200mm VR instead as changing glass is a nuisance.

This is the first time I have used anything but a point and shoot. I have been wanting a DSLR since I visited a friend with a Canon Xti and took some great pics of my child. I thought getting any DSLR would "work" and bought a Sony A230. I was so not satisfied and read that maybe the lens would help. Still not happy with the pics so I took it back and after extensive review bought the D90. The pics I am taking with this thing are outstanding. I bought the $100 potrait lens, the exposure books and some Nikon D90 guides. I still am deciding between a telefoto lens, between the 55-200mm or the 70-300mm. I also did a 30 day trial with lightroom and decided to buy it. Since buying this camera a month ago and learning all I could to do portraits, I have actually been asked for the copyright of the pics I took of my daughter and her baby brother because the photo guy thought a professional had done the pics. I also have been asked to take a pic for my friends article in a sports magazine. I knew nothing about photography before this. I've never adored a piece of equipment before where I thought if I could only save one thing in a fire it would be obvious what I would save until I got this camera. I would save the D90 (after people and pets of course). I L-O-V-E this camera.EDIT - it's been a year and I've used this camera a lot. I have found a big problem with my camera that I have seen various photographers complain about that doesn't appear to be user error. This camera can have a very soft focus or misplaced focus. I have found that toggling to focus does not work on this camera. I have used a 50mm 1.8, 50mm 1.4, and an 85 mm 1.4 and all have had the same issues. I transfered the pictures through ViewNX which shows you where the focus was aimed at and seen pictures where the focus is sharp on the pants when the focus was on the eyes. The auto focus is very hit or miss.