Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Nikon D90 Body

The D90 has been reviewed many times on Amazon, and some of those reviews are highly detailed and lengthy and go into lots of the technical specifications. Mine will be brief. I had the D80 for a few years prior to purchasing the D90. I enjoyed it a great deal, but I sold it and upgraded to the D90. It was definitely worth it. While the high ISO quality is better than that of the D80 by a perceptible but not great margin, for me the most noticeable difference was truer color, particularly in mixed/difficult lighting conditions. It may be that in the intervening time, I've learned more of the nuances of tweaking white balance settings, but I truly do not think that that accounts for all of the difference. Even at times when I don't have time to fiddle and futz with using a custom setting, I just seem to get truer colors with the D90. If you look at some of the online photography review sites, you will find evidence to back that up. I don't know how soon Nikon may be coming out with another camera, but I intend to stick with this one for a long time. I think you really can't go wrong with the D90 unless you are a pro and need an extremely rugged camera or one with an even higher frame rate.

I have had several SLR bodies from Nikon and I have to say I feel very pampered with the D90. The Auto ISO and ADR (Adaptive Dynamic Range) make all forms of shoot SO much more convenient than a SLR that does not have these features. I truly can not imagine stepping backwards from these features. I love how high the ISO can go without showing obvious noise. I set Auto ISO to max out at 3200, set my aperture as large as I can get away with and just start shooting.The build quality is awesome. Nikon bodies just feel substantial in my hand. Every low to mid level body made by Canon feels like a cheap toy in my hands, but not my D90.This camera will soon be replaced by some newer body, but if you have the opportunity to buy this used or on the cheap DO SO! You will not regret it. Even if a new model brings better video features (which would be very welcome) the camera traits of the replacement surely would be only baby steps better. From what I have seen of the D7000 which is actually a higher level model, I can say there is no (non-video) feature that is a leap in convenience or image quality.If you don't believe me Ken Rockwell has some awesome statements about this camera. Read what he says at KenRockwell.com. If all of these other comments have not convinced you then maybe he will.

I bought this as an upgrade from a D60, because the D90 added a few features I was really missing with the the D60 (namely the better AF system, Live view, and built-in Commander mode), and much improved shooting controls. The ability to change just about any setting, even metering modes and enabling the IR remote, without diving into menus is wonderful, and was sorely missing from the D60. It's much more enjoyable, and easy, to shoot and get good pictures when the setting you want is easily available.A few other good/bad points:-The flash doesn't pop up automatically, except in 'Auto' mode, and even then you can disable the flash with the flash button and command dial. The D60 seemed to always want to use the built-in flash unless it was in daylight.-You can turn auto-ISO off in every mode, including 'Auto'. My only complaint here is that while you can select auto-ISO with the ISO button and command dial in 'Auto' mode, you can't in P/S/A/M, unless you have auto-ISO turned on overall, which prevents you from setting the ISO yourself.-For some reason, you have to go into the menus, or use the Function button, to select the AF area mode. You can select between continuous AF, single-servo AF and AF-Auto with the AF button and command dial, but the sub-command dial does nothing. It would be nice to use the AF button/sub-command dial to select between the AF area modes, rather than having to use up the only programmable button for it. Not really a big deal, but there's no need for it to be that way.-The AF/MF switch on the body is great. I assume it's to turn the built-in motor on and off for screw-drive AF lenses, and it also disables autofocus with AF-S lenses. I like being able to just flip that switch to turn the AF off, rather than having to mess with the tiny switches on the lens and hope I don't turn VR off or something.-A menu option to disable video recording would be nice. The video mode is practically useless anyway, and that would keep me from worrying about hitting the OK button while moving the focus point in LV and accidentally recording a movie.No huge complaints, and the few I mentioned could easily be fixed with a simple firmware update. Otherwise, I can't think of anything that I'd change, even compared to the heavier, much more expensive D300s.

I am a nikon snob. I currently have 3 nikon cameras. Love them all. The D90 is perfect for my needs. I love taking pictures, mostly nature, flowers, insects, lots of 90 mm macro photos. This camera works beautifully. Plenty of features, breathtaking images (with the right lenses, of course), easy to use. I paid about $750 with shipping. Wouldn't have considered another brand after owning a nikon 6006n for years. I bought this one in anticipation of our first born child. Well worth the money.

We have both a D300 and the latest addition is the D90 which replaced a D100 that finally died. The D300 is a fabulous camera well worth every penny. HOWEVER you can have a D90 which is just as nice and nearly as functional as the D300 for a lot less money. The D90 has 70% of the D300 features and they just happen to be the features we use. Seriously, do yourself a favor and think long and hard when choosing a D300 over the D90.

I don't have much to add about the camera itself. It is stellar. Image quality and dynamic range are superb.However, a reviewer below comments that it could be worth waiting for the D90's replacement, which is due out sometime this fall (or maybe later). There is a strong case for not waiting and picking up the D90 now. First, the price may not actually go down that much after the launch of the successor. Like the D40, the D90 is a milestone camera that will likely continue to be in demand even after its official product life is over. The D40, which itself has been discontinued for many months, is currently sold by various sellers on Amazon for a couple of hundred MORE than the last official MSRP. This is simply a function of supply and demand, and the same may be expected for the D90 over time because of how highly it is regarded. Second, while a new model usually has desirable new features - and there is no reason to think the D90 replacement will not have improvements over the D90, especially with respect to video capability - it may be worth waiting for the launch hype to subside, take in a few in-depth reviews, and wait for any initial firmware updates.In a nutshell, the D90 is a great camera, regardless of what will come after it. Unless more advanced video capability is a must-have, there is not much reason to miss out on shooting with the D90 now.

I've had the D90 for about a month and can't recommend it highly enough. My main camera for the last 4 years has been a Nikon D50. I also have an assortment of Nikon Af & af-d lenses, and I wanted to continue to use them (the D5000 lacks the necessary motor for the older lenses to autofocus). I shoot a lot of live theatre, and so low-light/high iso performance is important to me, and the D90 delivers extremely well up to 1600. Noise is well-controlled, and looks a lot like film grain. Once you learn how to mess around with the picture controls in the menus, jpegs can look stunning. Raw NEF files seem to need less processing after than the ones from my D50. The screen is big, bright & colorful. There are a ridiculous number of custom settings for almost every function, which means you can do a lot to configure the camera to the way you like to shoot. There are a lot of buttons & two wheels--almost too many controls--but with a little practice you can access almost any function you're likely to need in the act of shooting without menu-diving. I also do a lot of flash photography, and the highly-variable ISO control in conjunction with the ease of tweaking the white balance means a lot less time fixing color in Lightroom or photoshop.It also has Live View--but I'm not so crazy about that function. The autofocus in LV is slow, and taking a shot is noisy one loud click when the mirror gets out of the way, then the shutter, then the mirror jumping out of the way again (I think...). One other niggle: the multi-point autofocus doesn't work so well in low-contrast situations--ever since I changed it to the center point, I've never had a focus problem. I haven't shot any moving subjects yet, which is what it's designed for. I also haven't used the video function--newer cameras have much better implementation of this feature. In short: beautiful images, customizable, many pro features at a consumer price. Don't hesitate.

I am new to photography and new to the world of digital slr camerasthe camera is easy to use for the beginner and in discussions with other owners most just leave in auto mode when shooting picturesI went to dslr because most of my crtical shots are taken during my daughter's musicals where there is very low light conditions and the compact digital cameras just can't deal with the low lightin just about any condition other that the theatre the camera is smarter than me and I use fully auto or I'll use sport mode for soccer and other fast action situationswhat you must keep in mind is the importance of your lens for example I was not able to get pictures any better at the theatre with the kit lense than I could with my wife's coolpix 8000 that is why I ended up returning my initial purchase of the d90 kit and purchased just the bodyI then purchased a used nikon 2.8 80-200 zoom lens and a new nikon 1.8 55mm lensthe d90 has many features that most will never use but there are many lenses that fit this body which makes it versitalI like the feel of and it is easy to hold and change settings while shootingif you are new to photography I highly recommend a class prior to purchasing a camera this way you'll know what is best for you

Purchased the D90 to replace a D70. The primary features that were desired was greater ISO rating, larger playback LCD display and in camera image management and review. I found all of these features to be a significant improvement for photo shooting events. I was also pleased with a number of the improvements in the on camera button control features. They were more intuitive and functionally placed for ease of the photographer. Overall it was very similar to the D70 so the learning curve was greatly accelerated. Have used on two major events that I really was greatly a benefit to shoot with the D90.

It's like I've entered a whole new world of photography. I love how fast this camera is, and I couldn't be happier with the photos it takes.

I've owned a point and shoot camera for 2 years now, and I have always been jealous of the quality and versatility of DSLR cameras. I didn't want to chunk down $1K on a camera without knowing about them, so I did a lot of homework. Before purchasing the Nikon D90 w/ kit lens, I researched several web sites along with other photographers and artists alike. All sources pointed to the Nikon brand for it's high quality build, reputation and ease of transition from newbie beginner shots to the professional arena. I opted for this model in lieu of previous cheaper Nikon's so I can use older glass prime lenses with the D90, thus potentially saving me money in the future when it comes to buying different lenses. The kit lens is an excellent beginner lens, however after 500 or so pictures, I can see it's limitations, and will be looking for a 50mm f/1.4-f1.8 lens for better portrait pictures. I would not, however, go and buy a ton of expensive lenses before you use the kit lens and determine if it is enough for you or not. I searched several competitor web sites and stores and Amazon offers the best price for this kit. Other web sites are roughly $120-200 more for the same kit (October 2009). I knew that a camera of this caliber would be a challenge, so I bought a book on digital photography specifically around the D90 prior to purchase. I have the grasp of the basic functions, and regular day pictures, however night photography is a little trickier. I would highly recommend a tripod if you plan to shoot a lot in low light conditions. Even though the camera has VR, it does not fix all movement/exposure issues in low light conditions.MAIN PROS:- Great price- Ease of use (with basic features)- Interchangeable with older lenses for better future value- Live View- Great 12.3 megapixels for very sharp photos- In camera photo editing- Shoots in RAW & JPEGMAIN CONS:- Nikon software is TERRIBLE! I use a Mac running 10.6 snow leopard and the software crashes constantly. Nikon's web site has no solution for this, even after the software supposedly updates itself after install. Apple's Aperture, iPhoto and Adobe products have no problem recognizing the camera and quickly importing the photos.- Kit does not include a SD card, therefore preventing you from taking pictures right out of the box. Prepare to make a run to the store for a minimum of 4GB SD card (takes about 1K JPEG photos).

This is my second D90. It is of the same quality as my first. I'm a professional wedding photographer and the D90 meets or exceeds my wedding photograhy requirements...It is an excellent camera for portraiture (when used in combination with Nikon's CLS). I bought another D90 before the D7000 was available simply because I don't think the 7000 is significantly better than the D90 except for the addition of a few more pixels in the same size sensor. That does not yield better photo quality than the D90 at 12.2 mp. Admittedly the 7000 has a higher framing speed but I don't think it's significantly higher to warrant the extra cost. In essence, my opinion is that both are excellent cameras and why not save a few hundred while you can. Wedding photography produces a large number of images and the last thing I need at this point in time is larger file sizes when I'm ultimately going to re-size the "finals" back down to around 6 mps for the couple's DVD. "Good on ya" Nikon!

I am a professional photographer and I bought this on a whim when I was in Hawaii a few years ago. It's probably too big for most moms to carry around but it's very lightweight in comparison to what I usually lug around. I haven't used it to shoot client sessions but my daughter has and she's gotten amazing results. I love having it and I take it everywhere. The video is really fun. The images are beautiful and you can get really nice prints. This kit is a great value and you can play forever trying different angles and settings. Cristy [...]

I don't usually write reviews, but this product was just awesome. I was very skeptical at the beginning because I read other reviews saying that the camera would get error messages when attaching the lens to the body, but I still ended up buying the product. I've had my Nikon D90 for about 4 months now and haven't had any problems at all. I've also taken at least 1000 shots already.

Per product description, I expected D90 could drive my old Nikkor AF zoom lens. It can, but unfortunately not the whole range. For example, it cannot drive my AF zoom lens of 70-210mm. It's not totally compatible with all Nikkor AF lens. Also, for those ones it can drive, it works at only one aperture setting.Another feature I looked for in this model was the LCD display of live-view. However, D90 needs a button to turn on the live-view. The button is at an inconvenient position. To take the photo, we need to press the button to shut off the live-view first. This is a clumpsy operation. Canon uses a photo-sensor to perform the same operation, which is much smarter than Nikon in this sense.D40 uses a CCD sensor. However, D90 goes backwards to use a CMOS sensor. Is it a compromise for cost?

Flat out...the D90 is one excellent camera! Nikon has done themselves proud with a camera that is now in a market that is full of tough competition. A while ago when the D80 first came out Nikon was way ahead of the pack because there wasn't much competition. Things have changed signifigantly and Nikon has kept pace with the demand. The camera has several preprogrammed "scene" modes like most digital cameras, such as "Portrait", "Landscape", "Micro", "Sports" and "Night" There isn't anything unusual about the modes of course, it's the quality of the image that you get from each of those modes that dazzles. The camera has a multitude of features including custom programming modes so you can adjust the camera to take a particular scene the way YOU want instead of the way the manufacturer wants.The camera is built very well, solid and it feels great in your hands. It's the kind of camera you can take with you to a football game and not worry about someone damaging it with a slight bump. It comes in body only or with several "kit" lenses. The most common being the 18-105mm Zoom lens with Vibration Reduction. The lens is of good quality although you could buy a better one by avoiding the kit lens.The camera is a bit overpriced. Not outrageously so but Nikon could have shaved a few dollars off.The bottom line is the D90 even with a slightly inflated price is an excellent camera that takes quality images even under the most demanding conditions. If you are inexperienced at photography but want a quality camera set the D90 to "auto" and point and shoot. The camera will do the work and the images will be consistantly perfect. Once you have built up some experience you can program the camera to set your mood.As for "Cons" I have just one. It has a movie mode with 24 FPS (frames per second). The movie mode is not very good if that's an important feature to you. When panning you get "shutter lag" which causes image attributes such as straight lines (the sides of a building for example) to get "skewed." If you are using it for occasional movies and avoid action scenes you won't mind but football games are out. The D90 was the first DSLR to have movie mode so I suppose one can excuse Nikon as they were the first on the block to try it. Of course you don't buy a DSLR for movies so it's kind of a "white elephant" Take it as a nice feature to play with but your camera is for taking photographs not movies.I can't recommend this camera enough. It simply takes great photgraphs. That's the job of a camera and the D90 does it very well.

This camera has been technically superceded by the D7000, which of course costs more. However, after having owned one for two years now, I can say that it is still terrific and fully capable of rendering fantastic photos. For examples, search "D90" on Flickr. You can probably pick one up at a significant discount now. Be aware, the water resistance is low, and I am not talking about taking it in the pool with you, I mean don't take it out in the rain AT ALL. I got caught in a downpour in which I thought I was shielding the camera with a plastic bag for the majority of the time but somehow a tiny amount of water got in and bad things happened. Fortunately Nikon honored the warranty and fully repaired the camera. Yea Nikon!

There is a known problem with the D90 Camera that you should be aware of. It does not occur in all of the D90s. When it happens, the camera malfunctions and locks up. I was, unfortunately, one of the unlucky ones. I purchased a D90 18-105 VR Kit 5/9/2010. Two weeks later, the camera was unresponsive. I had to turn the camera off/on several times. Then, 8/14/2010, I got the dreaded "Err" message. The camera locked up until I removed the battery. I got 2 more shots before the "Err" occurred again. This time the camera would not shut off and when I removed the battery, all of the memory was lost. After getting on line, I found that this has been a known problem with some of the D90s. I located Nikon's phone number, on line as it's not in the manual or any information which came with the camera. There was no hassle with returning the camera for repair. The irritating part is, even though it is under warranty and this is a known problem, I have to pay the shipping to return the camera. Plus, Nikon cannot give me a turn around time. I really wish I had purchased another model instead of the D90. I spent $1200 and now I'm out a camera for my daughter's fall soccer season. Great.

This is the perfect camera for the outdoors man. I purchased this for my son's graduation present and he loves it. Light weight and perfect for the outback excursions.

The Nikon D40 was my very first dSLR camera. A fantastic leap from the point-and-shoot side of the fence! I had the camera for about 4 years, but really only started getting serious about photography a little over a year ago. After shooting with the D40 body and mastering it (the camera, not photography) over the course of a year, I was starting to hit imitations of the camera hardware and it was starting to look like it was time for an upgrade. I really prefer and like the Nikon camera bodies, so I knew I would be upgrading to a new Nikon. I studied all the bodies and reviews for months to find out what would be the best upgrade for me. It came down to the D90 and the D300.The two seemed to have pretty similar specs minus the video on the D90, although the D300 was touted as more of a "professional" camera. One of the biggest features I wanted was the command and sub-command dials for aperture and shutter speed adjustments.The video on the D90 leaves a little to be desired. Especially compared to the new D300s that came out a couple months after purchasing the D90. Video is not all that important to me, so it is just a bonus to be able to shoot little video clips with the same camera I already have with me.I find the build quality of the D90 to be much higher than some of the newer bodies coming out like the D3000. The body feels great in the hand and is a good weight. I like a larger camera body and this is just that. I found the D40 a little annoying to hold due to its small size. I had a battery grip on the D40 simply to make it more comfortable to hold with a longer lens.The image quality on the D90 is great. A very nice improvement from the D40, although the raw files were a lot harder to work with on my old laptop. The D40 raw files were no problem, but the D90 at twice the size made the computer chug. I have since upgraded to a new MacBook Pro, so it is no longer an issue.As far as lenses go with this new body, I bought the Nikon 35mm f/1.8. This lens is AMAZING! Super sharp and fast. And for only $200, you have to have this lens in your bag. I also rented the Nikon 18-200mm from [...] and I WILL be buying that lens at some point. It was so versatile and handled a full day shoot walking around town without having to stop and swap lenses.Overall, If you are in the market for a Nikon body upgrade from one of the lower tier bodies I would say this is definitely a camera to look at. If video is more important to you, you may want to look into the D300s instead. For me, stills are where I want to be, and this camera body does not disappoint!

The Err indication shows up and the only way to correct it is to remove the battery for a short time. This shouldn't happen on a Nikon!

I chose the d90 as my main wedding camera along with the nikon 18X135mm lens. I am reasonably new to wedding photography and videography and would be considered an amateur by professionals in the photography business. I have successfully photographed several family weddings including one of my own, and just completed my first real (meaning paid) wedding for a local family I've known for several years with the d90. I chose it since it can be used totally on automatic everything, and has high definition movie capability. I have only been able to get up to a 4 minute movie which is okay for lots of wedding situations. I used the movie feature about a dozen times and took a total of 362 images a couple of weeks ago at this wedding. I use my smaller Olympus SP510 Ultra Zoom on a tripod filming the entire wedding and hold the d90 to get close ups. I later get family of the bride and groom with the d90 on a tripod. I found the d90 to be simple to use on auto, but the lens never moved and the instructions say not to adjust the lens when it is in auto move. So, I adjusted everything to manual during much of the wedding, and was able to take some very sharply focused pics. The flash was good, but I will get additional lighting prior to the next wedding! About 25% of the 362 had flaws, but they were my errors, not the camera's. The 'crop' function on most software will get rid of some errors. I am simply amazed by the resolution on the pics this 12.3 MP creates. They are truly beautiful! The camera is easy to use; I did spend about 2 weeks taking practice shots and videos around the house and studied the manual closely prior to this wedding. I have a long way to go to learn all of it's capabilities, but one can use it right out of the box successfully and easily. I use a grip with it so I have two lithium batteries on board plus two more charged and ready if needed. The camera battery door had to be removed and I could not find adequate information in the manual on how to complete this task, so I had to google it and quickly found instructions online. The battery door is stored inside the Opteka grip I purchased with the camera in a unique place inside the camera and attached to the grip. The camera and grip were bulky at first, but were easy to get used to (I am an average male in size, about 190lbs in my late 50's). It has 'wheels' or dials that you rotate to activate certain functions along with a big 3.5 inch screen, a dust reduction system and anti shake feature, several scene modes and a relatively easy menu feature. It accepted a 16gb card not on Nikon's list of suggested cards with no problem, and formatting requires the touch of two green labeled buttons on top of the camera. Download time was great with USB cables supplied by manufacturer. Again, the two main features I like about it are the incredible clarity and resolution of the photos even at close range and the HD movie capability! My clients were very happy with the results. Like the literature from Nikon says, it is: 'A great camera to grow with!'

Bought with the kit lens as an early Christmas gift to myself - and started taking some great pictures right away just on the automatic mode. Have been learning the M/A/P modes now, with pretty nice results. Wanting better low light performance to capture moving toddlers preferably without flash, I was trying to decide between the Nikon 50mm f/1.8D AF Nikkor Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras and the Nikon 50mm f/1.4G SIC SW Prime Nikkor Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras (not the Nikon 50mm f/1.4D AF Nikkor Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras with noiser motor), and to justify the extra hundreds to go from f/1.8 to f/1.4. Instead, because the 50 mm is really 75 mm given the 1.5 Dx crop factor, which is way too telephoto for indoor shots in my house, I got the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G AF-S DX Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras and have been very happy because it acts like a 50 mm prime and is an unbeatable combination of speed and price at f/1.8 and about two hundred dollars. I still think the kit lens is useful for the range, especially for outdoor shots when low light is not a problem. Back to the camera itself, it is like all DSLRs bulky and mildly obtrusive at events as compared to a compact or subcompact that fits in a shirt pocket, but that is the price for better pictures. A 16GB card will hold tons of RAW and up to 4300 jpgs. Video sucks because of the lack of auto focus, so it's okay for very short clips with little motion, not longer or larger scenes. Still, I think it's worth the price to have video for those moments when just a few seconds of video will capture the essence of what is happening, which would have otherwise been missed trying to switch to a camcorder (not that I would carry both at the same time). My only regret would be not willing to splurge for a full frame camera - yet.

I purchased the Nikon D90 body only because I already had many lenses from previous Nikon cameras.Having shot not an extreme amount of pictures,I would, by what I have seen from the exposures, rate it amongst the top of the line. The quality of the camera is the top of the line with 12.3 megapixels the quality of the pictures are there also. I am a good photographer but do not make a living from photography. I think photography is a tough road because everyone thinks they are good whether they are good or not. I see many poor photographs trying to be sold and they think owning and using a nice camera makes them good. It is in the eye. If you do not have the eye, develop it. No amount of equipment will make you good. It may help but that is the extent of it. I would have liked to have known what dx means. It means that it is not a true 35mm format camera. This means that the old 35mm lens focal length have to be adjusted by multiplying by a factor of 1.5. This by no means takes away from the quality of the camera but would have been nice to know. To get a true 35mm format camera you have to buy the 300, 700, D3 or above. This increase in focal length can actually work to ones advantage because a 200mm lens is now 300mm lens but a 28mm lens is now a 42mm lens so to get a true 28mm you have to purchase an 18mm (which is really a 27mm)lens.It is like owning a camera, a photo lab, a computer, cellphone (whoops no telephone here) all in one. It can be as complicated as you want or can be as simple as a pointie-shootie camera. But if all that you want is a pointie-shootie buy a cheaper camera and save your money. Whatever you buy, just remember it is in the glass not the bells and whistles.