Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Nikon D90 Body

I love this camera, best one I have ever used. Great product, got it for underwater photography, the housing for this camera is cheaper that for other models.

I bought a Nikon D60 as a entry level DSLR back in 2009. It did everything I needed it to in order to learn more about the technology and art of photography. The D90 not only adds more features, but also delivers much better quality than the D60. I would definitely recommend this product to others.

ive worked with the D90 in the past witch is why i wanted one of my own .. i think this one is perfect works way better then the one i was using it was a great purchase

It was my first purchase of a reflex camera, I was really worth it... Easier to use than I expected, and great results

Needed to upgrade and get 2nd camera. Enjoy this camera body with other lenses so I am able to have 2 camera bodies.

I am so happy with this camera, it has never let me down as of yet. The quality of the images is great, I love that I have an enormous array of options to choose from.

Эта зеркалка - рабочая лошадка...

Well, I'm no camera expert, but you can get my opinion as an amateur photographer, feeling too limited by the point-and-shoot and looking for an equipment upgrade.And what an upgrade this is! I am in love with this Nikon, for the most part it does everything I need quite well. Colors are excellent, vibration reduction is great, and it is low-noise. I was fairly unfamiliar with all the functions, but a read through the manual made everything very intuitive, and I am surprised how fast I caught on. So I also enjoyed to find that it was easy to learn.One of my favorite aspects is the ability to do some photo editing on-camera:- You can do a quick re-touch, which automatically adjusts levels for better contrast and color balance.- apply filter effects: warm filter, skylight (I still don't know what that is), blue filter, red filter, green filter, even cross-screen (more customizable than the actual filter, but not as organic and worse in quality than actual filter, so it has its pros and cons against the actual).- adjust color levels on a four-dimensional color grid.- adjust D-Lighting. This is a really really awesome feature to have, definitely a favorite!- fish-eye effect, as well as a sort of reverse fish-eye to correct for distortion- resize- tilt- RAW processing- crop- and probably more that i am forgetting- monochromatic in BnW, Cyanotype, and Sepia. The latter of the two being adjustable in saturation. You can also customize it further in shooting mode - you can pick almost any color and saturation!I especially enjoy the absolute customization you have over the white balance. You can select a preset, make your own presets in several ways, or adjust color temperature easily before every shot. Actually you can customize almost anything on this camera, and I love having my control. Most settings are really easy to change with the external buttons, without going into the menu.Live View is also a huge plus, but less helpful than I imagined. Apparently using Live View for extended periods of time damages the camera's sensor, and the camera has a very difficult time focusing in LV mode.There is a limitation with the viewfinder; it only shows about 95% of the space (that exists in all Nikons in this range, as far as I'm aware, and I don't know if other brands are any different).The movie option is good to have, but even though it's HD, the quality isn't that great so it's just something that's nice to have as an option.The only thing I can try to complain about is the camera's sensitivity to temperature. But this is an issue with all cameras, so there's nothing that can really be done. The manual says not to use the camera in below-freezing temperatures, but I have done so and so far it still works (I got a protection plan so I'm not too worried about ruining it to get some dazzling snow shots!). If it's in the cold for long periods of time, however, it begins displaying error messages. It seems that it loses contact with the CPU of the lens and does not detect it. (Actually, my other qualm is that sometimes it seems to lose this contact for no particular reason, which is annoying, but all I have to do is shift the lens slightly tighter onto the mount. I don't know if this is a problem with all cameras, but it seems that mine in particular isn't perfectly crafted, that the lens doesn't lock on the mount tightly enough, or something). If it's really cold, sometimes it displays another error and freezes up, so I can't even turn it off. So my recommendation is to keep the camera out of the cold as much as possible, and what has kind of worked for me is keeping it zipped up under my jacket between shots. Of course, it's better to stay out of the cold altogether.One other qualm, actually. I have noticed after transferring the photos that they are not the standard length/width ratio. They are slightly more panoramic/narrow, with black strips on the top and bottom filling out the rest of what should be the photo. I have no idea what this is all about, and I haven't noticed any settings for this, so although it might be my fault completely, I don't have evidence to believe that it is.Overall I am very pleased with my baby, I named her Delila, and we are going to live happily ever after. Or rather, until I have progressed enough as a photographer to crave more sophisticated equipment.So that's my very lay-man opinion. I recommend this camera to anyone who is looking for a hardcore upgrade from a point-and-shoot, and those who highly value having control and customization. For most intents and purposes, this camera will get the shot for you...EDIT...the matrix metering and the D-Lighting work great; the camera has a great sensor and captures an very good range of shadows/highlights.

I'm hard on cameras. I travel a lot, and I don't keep my cameras in cases, they are always over my shoulder in all kinds of weather conditions. The "semi-pro" D90 has proved itself under these conditions for 3 yrs, it is the 1st DSLR that I truly came to love. Much lighter than the D300, yet equally capable, equally durable. I have bounced my D90 off the sidewalk twice, in Sydney and Wellington (don't ask)...No matter, it just keeps giving me fantastic images. I have nothing negative to say about, it just works, and works very well indeed. A steal on the used market...

I just love this camera. I have had it for three years now. I had considered upgrading to the new Nikon D7000 but thought: Why? I am happy with the D90. I can set everything myself or just let the camera do the work on AUTO. My pictures come out crisp and clean. My daughter tells me my pictures are TOO good. She can see every bit of dirt on the grand kids faces and every little blemish on the adults faces. The price has come down. Grab this at a bargain price and start snapping away.

Пользуюсь чуть менее года, брал изнчально чтоб потом поменять на кенон. В общем не плохой аппаратик, свою цену, отрабатывает на 99% (хотя подешевел здорово, брал в том году за тридцать, сейчас стоит уже почти двадцать - обидно...), удобный, не прихотливый, хотя и нечем выдающимся не отличный. Ему явно...

This was my first DSLR. That being said, this camera, as with any DSLR, had a learning curve. My first 3 months of using this, my pictures I took with it looked as good a ones I took with my point and shoot. After getting some experience and doing some reading, I finally got the hang of it, and I was producing pictures that I've always wanted. Once you learn how to use this camera, it gets out of the way and lets you capture great moments. I recommend getting any of the SB Nikon flashes so that you can take great indoor pictures with flash.The best thing about this camera is the mixture of features it provides for the price. This camera is pretty dated, however, and if you're willing to spend a little more, just go for the D7000. If not, I suggest getting the body only and upgrading your lens. I use the kit lens, which isn't spectacular, so that's the next thing I need to upgrade.

отличный фотоаппарат ,фотографирую в студий уже полтора года. и фотографировала бы так как привыкла до жути.но перехожу на другой уровень...

С выходом D7000, D90 стал как бы его бюджетной версией. Конечно не так напичкан новинками как 7000,но для качественных фотографий его хватает вполне!

I start by stating that we are still waiting for those that can do the most critical of reviews concerning image quality (IQ), etc. Therefore, this will be a general reference of the features based on experience, the competition, and my own 2 cents.For those of you familiar with the D80, this camera is very similar. The 3" LCD is the first obvious difference. Besides being larger, it's much sharper, allowing more critical examination of photos, and, combined with live-view, a much greater ability to use for critical focusing. The only, very slight drawback, is the larger size seems to have required the toggle on the back to be slightly redesigned, and I feel it is a bit more uncomfortable (on my thumb joint) to toggle with the camera raised to my eye than on most Nikons.A closer look of the externals show a bit of difference in the plugs. The place for a remote control cord now is also an input for an optional GPS device. Cool, but Nikon hasn't released pricing for this piece yet, nor do we really know how well it will work, nor any of its complete functions. The camera now can output HD, which is a big boost if that feature is used.Going into the inside mechanics to things we can't see, the frames per second (fps) has been increased from 3 on the D80 to 4.5 on this camera. That's a tremendous advantage to budget oriented sports photographers. Going hand-in-hand with that feature is that the shutter has been upgraded to a 100,000 cycles. We like to think that shooting extra frames are "free", but shooting at high speeds puts a big burden on the camera's durability. We like to joke about 100,000 being a lot, but at 4.5 fps, that's about 6.25 hours until you camera's toast!Also inside inside is a cleaning system to keep dirt and dusk off the imaging surface.OK, so now let's go to the image quality. From the samples I've both shot and seen, they look good. But we really need to wait for critical reviews to be absolutely certain. From the D80, we've upgraded from 10 to 12 megapixels, which is nice, but the better part is we've gone to a CMOS sensor. This should have two results: 1) lower power consumption; and, 2) better low-light performance. The former is a certainty, CMOS sensors are way more power efficient than CCDs. The latter is based on experience. CMOS sensors tend to have nicer performance in low light shooting when we have to crank up the artificial "film" speeds to things like 1600 ISO. However, adding more pixels seem to make the situation worse. Based on previous experiences, and with the advances made in technology, the D90 should produce both sharper images and better low-light noise control than the D80.From just "looking" at the images I've shot, they look great in all kinds of conditions, although nothing I've shot would be considered "demanding". Sharpness is great, colors look real.From a spec point, the only thing that might be a bit disappointing is that the images are 12-bit and not 14-bit (like the D300). For those of you who shoot only JPEG (.jpg) images, that's no concern. For those who shoot RAW (.nef on Nikons), then 14-bit means that more data is recorded in the process of turning the image (taken by an analog sensor) into a digital file (called A/D conversion). If we go back to work with these files, there is more data available. This has some, limited, practical practice today. The biggest difference will be somewhere down the line when computer monitors allow more info to be displayed, and when printers allow more to be printed, etc. Twenty years from now you'll probably be able to make much better prints from today's images.Now let's touch on video. I think it's a great thing that video is included, because, at worst, you don't have to use it! What little I've done with the camera looks good (but I've only played it on the LCD), and the sound playback, although mono, was MUCH better than I expected. But let's not try to compare this with the best camcorders on the market. First, the HD clips are limited to 5 minutes. That simply won't work for many events, and even though you don't see many continuous 5 minute clips in "serious" productions, most of what you see are edited down from longer clips. The 24fps is a trendy thing today on BluRay players, because that's what feature length movies are shot in traditionally. However, 30fps is more typical video, which helps stops action better. Autofocusing is not available with video, which might be a hindrance for some people.My biggest disappointment was that Nikon didn't include "voice memo" capability, available on all Coolpix cameras. Since you have a microphone for the video, this feature allows you to attach voice memos of about 20 seconds to a photograph. This is a great way to connect a name to a face or place. Boo, Nikon, for not including this simple feature!OK, so how does it compare to the competition? We first must look at their biggest competitor, Canon. Price wise, the D90 is betw

I have owned this camera for over a year and have taken thousands of pictures. I bought my first digital camera back in 1997: a Sony with a floppy drive storage. Boy have we come a long way! When I compare this camera to some of the full frame models like the Nikon D3 and the upper end Canon models, the D90 holds its own considering the other cameras cost over $6000 more! I know the D3 has twice the pixel count (24.5mp to 12.4mp) but the only time the human eye (at least mine) can see a difference is when the picture is blown up to poster size or major cropping takes place. The D3 also has a faster continuous shooting speed of 9 frames per second (fps) to 4.5 fps for the D90. While this gives a definite advantage to the D3 in shooting fast moving sports activities, 4.5 fps is still pretty fast. The "quality" ISO setting is double the D90 but I find ISO 3200 on the D90 more than adequate and rarely use that. Finally the D3 is a full frame camera giving it an advantage when shooting with a wide angle lens. Of course you could argue the D90 has an advantage in the telephoto end since it extends the focal length.Don't get me wrong, I am not bad-mouthing the D3: it is a fine camera. My point is the D90 has virtually all the features the D3 has except the ones I previously mentioned and you can take the $6000 you save and can spend that on top quality lenses.So, what do I like about the D90? Well my "Top 10" (in no particular order): 1) Beautiful large high resolution LCD display 2) Movie mode: great for spur of the moment video capture 3) D-lighting 4) Button layout and quick access to changing parameters (rarely go into menu when shooting) 5) Live view: I like to manually adjust white balance and you can see the effect in Live View mode as adjustments are made 6) In camera editing functions 7) Info button: when depressed shows virtually all settings in shooting mode and allows key changes to be made when pressed twice 8) Ability to use Nikkor lenses (especially the fast 50mm 1.8) 9) Price ++++ 10) Last, but not least, the beautiful pictures!If you are wondering if I spent the $6000 I saved by choosing the D90 over the D3, the answer is no. I did buy the Nikon 18mm-200mm VR lens ($650), the Nikon 50mm 1.8 lens ($125) (might just be the best Nikon lens ever made on a dollar for dollar basis) and the Sigma 70mm - 300mm zoom ($200). I am about to purchase the Sigma 150mm 2.8 macro ($729). If you check out the reviews here on Amazon for that lens, you will get an idea why I am buying it. I can hardly wait to start shooting in macro mode with that lens. So my total expenditure on lenses will be less than $1800.Lastly, if you are thinking of buying this camera, I can strongly recommend it and also recommend you consider buying it through Amazon. Their replacement policy and support is great. They make it easy to return a product which I have on a couple of occasions and it couldn't have been easier!