Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Nikon D7000 Body

I will first say that I have owned Nikon cameras for 42 of my 59 years, so it is safe to say that I like their products.I was ready to update my Nikon D70 to a newer model and was excited to get my new Nikon D7000 before one of my daughter's wedding showers so that I could try it out. The new camera arrived, I opened it up, installed the batteries and proceeded to set the date, time and some of the other features necessary before actually using the camera. It was apparent immediately that the camera had a serious problem with it's display. The display just would not work at all. I tried everything I knew from years as an photographer and as an electrical engineer to get the camera working, (even calling Nikon tech support). However, it was apparent that I had received a broken or bad camera.I called Amazon and explained to them how important it was for me to have my camera before my daughters wedding shower in two days. They sent me a new Nikon D7000 and provided a UPS call tag to return the bad unit. Needless to say the new camera is all I expected and more and I am always pleased to do business with a company (Amazon) that goes the extra mile to take care of its customers. (Thank you Amazon)I would have given this review a 5 star rating for the camera had I not have had my initial experience, but Amazon made my experience as pain-free as possible.

Pros: Nice features of product Sharp pictures Battery backupCons: Heavy Missing bag UK 3 pin not available in market

With the newer modelD70?? just released, this camera becomes even more attractive. 16Megapixels is *more* than adequate for 99% of needs. 22is truly overkill unless you print 48" posters. This is a "pro camera" hiding in a mid-range price field. I read one review that compared Canon to Nikon, saying that Nikon (D7000) is like a "PC," whereas Canon's "comparable" is more like a "MAC." There's a certain amount of truth to that (having experience in both environments - computer and camera-wise). The Nikon is very user-friendly after one takes the time to read Owner's Manual thoroughly. This camera will not displease you. It has capabilities you will never need. Those you do need are excellent and workable.

// I'm an amateur photographer who's been using film cameras, digital point&shoot, entry level DSLR (D70) and I'm generally just learning about how to make interesting pictures, but shooting mostly in semi-automated modes.I've upgraded from a D60+Nikkor 18-200. Changed just the body and the lens is the same. I see a considerable difference in picture quality - especially in low light conditions. Looks like D7000 has so much better sensor. The body is bigger and easier to hold (than D60) in my big hands. And one of the main reasons I bought this camera (other than low light performance) is that it has full support for a grip (which makes it perfect for my hands + adds the vertical release button convenience).Other things I like about this camera are more focus points (that made my pictures come out in-focus more often), the dials are great, and the addition (again compared to my previous experience w/ D60) of the control LCD panel on top w/ the current settings is great. I think the U1 & U2 user settings will come in handy once I learn how to use the camere better. Oh, and there are so many options to fine tune the behavior (in D70 many were not changable at all).I've used this camera at home for taking pictures of my family, at soccer fields, and taking pictures of the neighborhood scenery: very happy with all of these.

since i got this camera mu photography works is better as usual nikon rocks!!hot stuff if you want to be a pro you need to start from this awesonme DSLR

I've owned two previous DSLR cameras, a Canon 20D and a Canon 50D and both were far better than this Nikon d7000. This camera simply can't take consistently in-focus pictures. Other reviewers mentioned this as well, but after further research I found that each lens needs to be calibrated for "AF Fine Tuning." I never, ever had to do that for any of my Canon cameras. This camera just requires too much fine-tuning, I'm going to sell it on Ebay and get a Canon 70d instead.

had mine for almost tow years nice,excellent camera and i highly recommend it. check this link for photo samples [...]

Im upgrading from a D3100 and the biggest difference is having the control of the complete camera at your fingers, the image quality is very noticeable, I love this camera and probably wont upgrade again for awhile.

Missing USB Cable, Audio Video Cable.By the time i realized this , return date expired. good luck.Check all required parts right away.

I dislike this camera with a passion. I am only giving it 2 stars because my husband does enjoy using it because it takes video and he does not have to change the lenses. What the consumer should know is that our Nikon D60 from 2008 takes awesome photos every time and requires little effort to get the photos right. The D7000 bites the dust in my opinion.

Still working on reading all the instructions and getting used to the different kind of settings. Had an D3000 Kit with a 18-55 and 55-200 lens for about 3 years now. So far:Love the improvement for pictures taken in low light environment.Solid case and seems very well manufactured. Appears high quality (as expected). Good grip holding the SLR.Lens covers a good range for shooting wide angle close and in distance, obviously not a telelens but good to go as long as you don't wanna do long distance shots.Motor for AutoFocus works fast.Manual Focus is possible as well and works quiet nice.I wouldn't need the two slots for SD Cards and i don't use my SLRs for taking videos, so no comment on that.I am far away from being a pro and probably just close to call myself an amateur. So some might think i overshot the target by buying a D7000, but i love it. Even with me, not being able to use all the nice functions on that SLR yet, it works so much better than my old Kit. No regrets on spending the money.I also have a TAMRON Tele Lens. 70-300mm USD that works perfect with the Camera. Nice addition to the 18-105 lens. Fast motor as well and so far, gooooood pictures.Hope that helped a little bit.

I bought this camera as a step up from the D70 I've owned for nearly nine years. That camera has been a real workhorse (and continues to be!), but this one adds the features I've missed with the D70. In addition to the video component on the camera, I love the faster processing speed and the enhanced focusing capabilities.

I use this camera for indoor sports and for weddings and for me it does the job on both . I own a new Canon too i haven't even had to use because of this one working so well .

When I first ordered the Nikon D7000 body, it crapped out on me after just two hours of use. The mirror got stuck in lock-up mode, and after googling my predicament, I discovered that it's a pretty common occurrence in the earlier makes of this model. After contacting Amazon and requesting a replacement, Amazon was amazingly fast in responding with a deep apology and sent out my replacement the very next day. I got it in plenty of time for my Aunt's wedding and I haven't had a problem yet! Very nice camera, takes amazing pictures (with the right lens of course!) and I would definitely recommend it...especially if ordering from Amazon! Great customer service!!

Quality product, vendor respects the deadline, I'm a Brazilian consumer and am very pleased with my purchase, I recommend. is safe and I am very happy.

I gave this item a rating of one star based on the included kit lens only; in my opinion the D7000 camera body itself is great! Read the various web site reviews in order to make your decision on the camera itself. However, the included 18-105mm kit lens is pretty mediocre; plastic mount and the images are not sharp (read the reviews.) It's like putting re-tread tires on a Ferrari. I sent this kit back and got the D7000 kit that included the 18-200mm lens. What a difference! Much better quality constructed lens (metal mount) and sharp images! Plus you get the extra zoom. Again, don't just listen to me, read the reviews on this lens on various web sites. You are already thinking about plunking down some serious bucks, so please, please, please spend the extra $300 bucks for the kit with the 18-200mm lens (you will also get a 16GB card and carrying bag.) This is a lens that sells separately for $800 bucks plus! Honestly, you will not be sorry. Get the kit with the 18-200mm lens and you may not ever need another lens! You've been warned! (didn't the Lorax say that?)

I had the Nikon d40 for awhile and heard about the D7000 rumor early 2010. I knew my next dslr would be the D90 or better. What I wanted was the dual scroll wheels and 1980x1080p video recording features and this totally delivered. Also a bump in megapixal and the new cmos sensor with better iso for low lighting would sweeten the deal. I carried over the Nikon 18-200vr, 50mm 1.8 and 35mm 1.8 from my old D40.Photos:I been shooting this camera since the first week of November 2010 and have taken about 4000 shots/some movie clips. At first I thought the image was a little soft. The poster on this d7000 forum told me how to fixed it in the menu and all is fine now. I am finally getting night shots, when I did night photo stroll with my friends the D40 was too slow and my iso skill back then wasn't great. Since I gotten this I played with almost every buttons and setting and actually shot aperture priority now, I been using the Nikon present for the D40.Movies mode:I am still learning this, getting things to focus on the fly. It does continuous autofocusing, but not as zippy as the Sony A33 I played with. Overall the movies I made are fun, but in no way anything you see on blu-ray 1980x1080p. I find that I do a better job of manual focus and it is much quieter. I plug an external microphone to this and it really is a benefit to filming with audio for less background noise.Positives:+Great photos, Sony newest CMOS is good for low lighting.+Camera Body motor, I have a 50mm 1.8 that I can finally use.+ISO looks very good, once I leave 1600, I can notice some different+more external buttons, entry level camera like the D40 uses the submenu too much.+Bigger body and sturdier magnesium alloy material, I like that in my hands with the rubber insert.+LCD screen is much improved, now I do know if a shot is good or bad.+Live view photography, I don't use it much but I like the option too.+Nikon Service, I called about the stuck pixel in Movie mode, they said wait for the firmware, and it got fixed.+Nikon ViexNX is good for quick adjustment.+1080p 24fps Movie mode with continuous auto-focus(like I said not as zippy as Sony, but much quieter) I made a few youtube videos now.Neutral:Battery is bigger and more expensive then before. I Since I record clip more it is hard to compare to the D40 which just took pictures. I get 350-400 shots before I recharge. Some people claim 1000 shots per charge, but that is not me. My 4000shot hashas 5-6 charges already.Negative:-GPS, if the Sony A55 with the same cmos as this can have one for cheaper, why not the D7000.-I was hoping it be around $1000. The Sony A33 and A55 are much cheaper, with the same cmos.Overall I like the pictures that I got from the D7000, and all the external layout. I can bracket shots with ease, for HDR editing photoshop of course. I don't have to go into the submenu to turn on the remote. I even used the continuous burst for once. The Nikon ViexNX is a good software for quick fix like for contrast and sharpening. It is no way a Lightroom or Photoshop replacement, nope. It can edit video too, but I just use the Window Media player on Win7. I have/carried this camera around me like a cellphone. I added the Nikon SB-700 to this camera and the two work well together, ie the wireless flash. Is the 18-105 lens worth 300, if you don't have any lens(es) yes. It is an acceptable walk-around lens with a decent zoom an ok 3.5 at 10 and 5.6 when you zoom to the 105. Later on maybe get some faster lenses (bigger glass and aperture) like a zoom f2.8 or either a 35 or 50mm prime f1.8 or for more bokeh.

No problems, easier than writing this review... product is what is was said to be...in very good shape..very happy...now,if you ask for another word it will be delete

Very fast focus, better than my older D100. Quality of display image on the computer is a lot better than my Sony little digital camera even at the same resolution.One thing I really surprised and like, it has perspective control in the program. This is mighty important for architecture photography. You no longer need to buy a more expensive shift lens anymore for taking picture of buildings etc.Only slight complain. Camera of this quality should have a PC sync for studio and product photography use. I was a pro photographer before, this camera is perfect for pro use, I don't want to carry double the weigh, pay double the price for a real pro camera just hoping it will hold up when you drop them. Weight is the most important when you climb up and down. Also, camera out dated as fast as PC computers, why pay thousands for something that if only worth a few hundred three years later?

Let me start by saying I upgraded to this DSLR from a Nikon D3100, so this is definitely a big upgrade for me. I mainly wanted to upgrade so I could access the manual controls, as I was tired with just turning a dial and using preset modes that tended to over or under expose.-This camera's 6fps shooting is amazing, and never ceases to amaze me! I'll just push the shutter down for a few seconds just to hear the fun shutter sound(;-The video is great, but I don't really use video very much. I find the autofocus noisy with my 50mm f/1.8, so I tend to use manual focus when on video.-Even though it may not mean a lot coming from a 15 year old, this DSLR would be great for any skill level. The reaction time when changing any mode or setting is split second, and it never fails. I've never once had the whole camera just freeze up, resulting in me having to reset it by removing the battery, like my D3100. This really is a quality machine. It has a great design and fits great in your hands just like it should. Unless you're a 5 year old, the D3100 isn't exactly the greatest size for hands. (Though I'm still a fan of the D3100 of course)I recently dropped my D7000, about 2 weeks ago resulting in my kit lens being ruined and the camera body being cracked on the top left corner. This is when this camera showed me it was of real quality.The lens broke completely off of the mount,completely cracking the lens, and the camera body mount itself is still perfectly intact and nothing looks out of place. The little crack on the magnesium alloy body is just cosmetic, and I'll probably go over it with a little tad bit of black paint one day, as it's very minute and isn't worth sending into Nikon to get the whole piece replaced.My final opinion: DEFINITELY worth the extra $500-$700 from the D3100, if you want a more professional camera. It's a great quality DSLR, and is a great representation of Nikon's products.By The Way: The lens I bought to replace my kit lens is the Nikkor 50mm f/1.8. I HIGHLY recommend it and I'm still amazed by the low light quality. It's a great, capable lens.The focusing distance tends to annoy me. You can't get as close as you'd like, but for $120 bucks, you can't complain that much.My next lens will be the Nikkor 40mm f/2.8 Micro as it has macro capabilities, is a great middle focal length between the 35 and 50 f/1.8, and still has a low aperture!

This is my first DSLR camera and i love it. The quality of the pictures and the various options in it are really amazing.

The positives of the D7000 vs. D90 after two months of use:1. I shoot mainly indoor sports primarily high school jazz and high-kick dance routines in low and lousy light typically. This camera is considerably better than the D90 in this area. Very sharp and bright images with little or no noise up to ISO 6400. I generally use a Nikon f/2.8 70-200mm VR lens which yields excellent results.2. 100% image as shown in viewfinder.3. New extra dial that lets you store two completely different sets of camera settings. This makes switching between two modes especially fast when needed.The negatives (only applies if you expect to shoot many shots quickly and in raw)1. One of the things even the expert reviewers are missing is that this camera at 16MP creates around a 20MB raw file. This isn't a problem for general use but when shooting rapid fire or shooting every second or so the buffer fills up before writing out to the card. You can take up to 10 shots at any speed you wish but once it is full you have to wait several seconds to open space to continue or take fewer shots which is what I do to not miss that all important moment. I never had this issue with the D90 - I could shoot as rapid as I wanted. Granted the image is much better/larger and in 14 or 12 bit raw but be aware of this limitation going in. When shooting JPEG, the buffer size increases considerably so if you normally shoot JPEG it might not be a problem.2. The dual card slot sounds great. There are several menu options to configure how you want the slots to behave; mirror so that as you take each photo the camera writes out to the other card at the same time. Sounds great for backup? It is great if you shoot slow or general stuff. However, shooting quick, fast shots, it slows the write process down even further to the point where it is not very useable. So I always opt for having the second card to act as overflow so when the first card fills up it automatically switches to the second card. This doesn't seem to slow it down. There are also several different configurations for the dual card slots. I would suggest downloading the user manual from Nikon prior to purchase to see if it will meet your needs.3. As you push the shutter release it is harder to determine when the shutter will close and slightly delayed on occasion compared to the D90 which was crisp and felt just right. Its not too bad once you get accustomed to it being more sensitive and know how to deal with it but at first you will notice a sharp contrast.4. I added a battery grip which makes the camera balance and grip much better especially with the larger lens for going into portrait position. Nice features on it and well positioned. However, its a trade off in that you have to take the grip off every time you want to charge the battery that remains in the camera. Only one battery is in this battery grip vs. the design made for the D90 which was two.In general I highly recommend this camera despite the comments above. The limitations above are something to be aware of for my shooting conditions. If these don't match how you plan to use the camera you will be delighted by it's performance over the D90. You will still be delighted in any case.I also have used the D700 and D3 and I would say this camera produces images comparable to the D700 in in some cases superior. It's not D3 or D3X class but the images are hard to distinguish until you get into really low light situations.No difference:The magnesium body vs plastic body. I didn't really notice the difference between the two cameras. They feel and look about the same and weigh very close.

I upgraded my body to this recently from my old Nikon D80. Paired with a Nikon 24-70mm 2.8f lens and a Sigma 70-200mm 2.8f lens, this thing is a BEAST compared to my D80.The biggest differences I see are:1) The focus speed and accuracy - with the 39 AF points it captures most of my shots with my kids running around2) Amazing usability at high ISO ranges - I mean I've had this cranked up to 2500 ISO and zero graininess on indoor pictures at my kids b-day parties with no blur at shutter speeds as low as 1/80.3) 6 shots per second - doesn't sound like much but taking shots of the kids running around, you get some great expressions you would otherwise miss4) Ability to shoot video. Obviously not the main reason I got this, but it's a nice feature to use once in a while5) dual memory card slots. Can you see never run out of room with 2 32 GB SD cards loaded? :-)If you have a D80 and you can still find one available for under $900 now that the D7100 has come out. Don't think, just buy.

I did a lot of research on the different high-end amateur digital cameras and decided on the Nikon D7000.Then at the last minute I saw that the Nikon D7100 is now available, and I bought the D7100 instead. Read the comparison reviews and videos you can find on-line, and consider the D7100 also before making a final decision.The D7100 has some additional features and changes which you may like.I got the 18-200 mm lens (in this package) and it's a great all around fairly small and lightweight very versatile zoom.I love macro photography and also bought the Nikon AF-S DX Micro 40mm lens -- a great compact all-around lens, and a fantastic macro lens!