Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Nikon D7000 Body

I love this camera. Haven't got a single problem. It is for those who want to move a level up from amateur photography. I had D5100 before this and used it for some 5 months but then I lost it. :( and got this one.

Great Camera. Got this before a trip to Africa to go on Safari. The Nikon D7000 is pretty easy to use if you're new to a DSLR. There are a bunch of automatic features/settings to make it easy. The controls for manual adjustments are pretty easy to learn with the help of the user manual. I was very happy with using the 18-200mm lense as an all purpose lense as you don't have time to switch out lenses on Safari. There were only a few times when my 8x binoculars needed to be used to get a better view that was too far for see through the camera viewfinder. The quality of the shots are so good that you can always zoom in and crop on the computer and the pictures are still really clear. The bag is very cushioned so I wasn't worried about the camera safety at all while travelling. It does become slightly big if you want to carry it around for day trips, so in those cases I just use a camera strap.

It was a tough decision to step up from my aged D7, but had to do it. Researched all the Nikons and competitors, then decided to go for the D7000. It proved to be the right decision. Over the intervening 10 years since my last Nikon camera, the features have greatly expanded. I love the wider focus options, higher ISOs, double memory cards, and video capability. Yet with all the added features and expanded capabilities, the basic Nikon interface remains the same, lowering the learning curve. Still exploring the onboard editing options. Ironically, I was most excited to discover the ability to shoot b/w! Nikons are rock solid and fit the hand. As close to using an old SLR as you can get, with digital features, all under $1000.

Used, but in great condition! I heard very good things about this camera and I have a lot to learn, but I'm looking forward to learning it on the D7000. The charger I received didn't work, but the seller sent me a new one in a matter of days. I'm satisfied!

I own the nikon d7000 as apart of my nikon dSLR collection. This is far more advanced than the previous D70 & D80 I own. The images are crisper and sharper in appearance. This dSLR captures images at a faster rate than my previous models. The camera itself feels more professional than my other models, I'm glad I spend the extra money and took the step up from the next in line d90 and got the d7000

I bought this to replace my D200 which is way out of date! I am simply in love with it. take it everywhere with along with my backup D3100 :)

I am a professional photographer. This replaced my Nikon D200. I like it very much. Has great ability for low noise non flash pictures. The only drawback is that in auto iso the flash still stays in it unlike the D200. I do not think the flash should stay in auto iso when turned on. Soooooooo what I do is set the camera in for normal weding photography using auto iso but if I go to flash then I use u2 which I set for manual iso. I actually have 3 settings. Normal is auto iso. U1 is for bird photography with focus set for dynamic. U2 is wedding photography without auto iso which I use for the mounted flash. I prefer the way the D200 works for the flash but this gets me by. The camera is superior to the D200 especially in low light. I see the new d7100 to be an upgrade in both focus engine and in megapixels but not much different in low light rendition. I will wait for the next upgrade

It is a wonderful camera a I have every used. Perfect performance and good looking. Easy to learn and use.

From the moment I heard about this camera's release, I was very excited and immediately began the process of justifying its purchase. Once I was able to drop the $1200 all I could find was the kits and I really didn't want the lens that came with it so I waited. And waited. And waited some more. It took almost 3 months for me to find just the body, and I must admit that it was well worth the wait.From the get go, I noticed the mirror slap was much quieter than that of my D200 and I found it to be a pleasing sound. Definitely better for stealthier situations. It was also immediately apparent that the body was smaller than the D200 as well, but not so much so that I could feel a big difference while shooting. Another thing that I noticed was that the larger display was crystal clear and a nice upgrade. The general controls on the body were similar enough to the D200 that it didn't take me too long to figure most of them out, but there were a few options that I had to consult the manual to figure out; specifically, changing the flash mode and trying to figure out where the shutter release cable plugged into. The user menu is similar as well so I had little trouble setting up my normal shooting parameters.I was very pleased to see that the D7000 wasn't nearly the battery hog that the 200 is. I purchased a spare battery and the MBD11 "multi-power" battery pack and got roughly 3,000 frames from the first battery. That's over double what I would get from the D200 and the BP that accompanied it.There are a few other improvements over the D200 that I have noticed as well. The exposure metering seems more accurate and the AF motor is quieter too. I love the 16 MP images (twice that of my previous body) and despite my initial apprehensions, I even like the dual SDHC card slots though I wish I could still use my collection of CF cards. The auto white balance is HUGELY improved over the D200. I would usually do a custom WB for each lighting situation I would encounter. The D7000 has yet to be taken out of Auto WB mode and the results are more than acceptable.The noise at higher ISO settings is greatly reduced in comparison. I get more noise shooting with the D200 @ ISO 1600 than I do with the D7000 with the ISO @ 6400. And the fact that I can go to 6400 makes the camera all the better.Then there's the built in intervalometer which gives the D7000 the ability to automatically shoot one frame per second for up to 999 seconds. This is the feature that I was most excited to use and have used it a few times already. I am a huge fan of time lapse photography and now I have the ability to do TL projects. My only gripe is that the camera's internal software limits us to just 999 frames. That's only 16.25 minutes of shooting when taking one frame per second and when you make your movie (which is normally @ 24 frames per second) that works out to roughly 42 seconds of TL video per session.Speaking of video, that is another feature that I was very excited over and I am looking forward to using when opportunities arise. I have used the camera in video mode all of once in the past six weeks and I am not completely happy with the results. In all fairness though, I am sure that the issues I have with the videos shot are more from operator error than they are from the camera. I really need to read the section of the manual pertaining to the video capabilities before I say anything unflattering.As time goes on and I've had a chance to give the camera even more of a work out, I will make any necessary amendments to this review.Strengths:16 MPISO range from 100 to 6400 (25,600 on the "H settings)6 FPSBuilt in intervalometerGreatly improved auto white balance100% View FinderMetal frameWeather and dust sealsWeaknesses:Limited number of frames can be shot using interval shooting.Similar Products Used:Nikon D100Nikon D200

Company says 150,000 shutter clicks, I have been using it for about 2 years and the think just jammed up on me. I can see a bent shutter on the inside. I've been told it will cost anywhere from $200-300 to get it fixed, sigh.The camera has worked fine, other than a quirk where when it's in Manual mode the camera thinks it's actually one dial movement further down on Apeture mode. I could fixed that by returning to auto mode and taking out the battery. It was just annoying.I was a little surprised by the price coming down so far. Bought it for $1,200 in 2011, now right at 2 years later it's going price is $600. I realize they came out with a "new" D7100 model, I just would have expected the camera to hold it's value a little better. I was thinking it would be different than a computer or other electronic device, guess I was wrong.Camera overall feels great, takes great photos, has plenty of customizable features. I was happy enough to buy a second backup D7000, but now with the low shutter failure I'm beginning to wonder if I shouldn't just sell them both and try a new model.

I've had this thing a few years....... love it. Great camera. Does everything I ever need it to do . Very happy.

Wonderful camera, I only a problem with the battery not hold a charge. It is a little more complicated to set up to my standards because of the menus in menus I have only had it a month and have only used it twice for work. It will be better with use.

I had purchased a D70 a few years back and had accumulated a number of Nikkor Lens over the years. No long ago, I pulled out the D70 and the sensor had gone bad, so I returned to to NIKON up on NY and they wanted over $500 to repair. I knew because the camera had a few years on it, I would be better off purchasing a new camera to replace the 70 instead of repairing it, so I ordered a D5100. I guess I didn't do enough homework before the purchase was made, and found out that all my NIKKOR lens would not function as they were designed on the 5100, I was going to loose the auto focus option on the new 5100 body, so I returned the camera and upgraded to the 7000, yes it was more expensive but if I had to replace all my lens with ones that would function to their maximum potential I would spend much more than the cost difference in the two bodies. I am so happy that I made the change. The D7000 is one awesome camera, it is a bit heavier somewhat larger but much better construction. I will not knock the 5100, which I believe has now been replaced with a new body. As for the difference in the mega pix on the cameras, I don't think I will ever see a difference between the 16 meg on my 7000 vs the 24 meg pix on the 5100. I couldn't be any happier with my 7000.

Like most reviewers state and its true: Nikon took much of the alloy construction and weatherproofing of most expensive full format cameras as well as the best chip technology from FX line and actually put it in a DX camera!!!! This makes for all the great quality and functions of most FX cameras into a cheaper DX cropped camera with the best chips inside to date. Camera is upgradeable thru firmware updates also just by hooking up to computer with included micro to USB cable, fast charger and very long life battery. I have the big MD model Nikon extended battery system on body but rarely do I ever need to draw power from it unless I'm using the high power 900 Nikon Flash or some other battery drawing add-on. This is a SERIOUS camera. The two SD Card slits is awesome on the DX line. I've rented all the most expensive cameras and for all around everyday shooting whether portrait, landscape, seascape, or shooting the northern lights under very dark conditions, the ISO higher settings have little to no noise and it comes with a very thick and in depth guide to get you use to the advanced features fast. Be prepared to buy a weatherproof color coded shortcut guide or use the cameras built in feature to create your own customized menu with just the settings you need to change the most because its menu is huge. Oh, did I mention the gorgeous and highly decorated video photography this camera is capable of with 3D auto focusing and face recognition, etc, etc!!!!

This is a preliminary review. I'm a pro photographer who has been faithfully served by Nikon D200 & D300's for event and nature photography. Just before a trip to the Everglades, my D300's lcd info panel light wouldn't turn off and it kept abnormally seeking the cf card resulting in quick battery drain. Of course the fix was having lots of batteries and turning it off when not shooting. But In panic assuming that the D300 was going to completely fail, I read Ken Rockwell's review and noticed the D7000's price. With time running out and not wanting to shell out $7K for the D3x (or D700 for other reasons) I somehow found one D7000 kit, but not body, offered by Amazon and could get it quickly. It was on b/o everywhere else I looked. I didn't want or need the lens, but what can you do sometimes?I haven't had time to evaluate image quality in detail, but it's impressive at least up to ISO 1600. Without the battery attachment it's small and light, but with good ergonomics. It's got most of the feature required for my shoots and tons of goodies if you're just a camera bug. Combined with the 18-200 VR it's a dynamite, relatively affordable package. It was easy to use without consulting the unusually well written manual. However, if you're used to the D300, etc., you won't be happy with the organization of the controls. The iso button's on the back left and the exposure options are set with a dial like on the D70, so you can't change the most important settings as easily. I don't like the new control for setting the focus options. But if you've never used a D200/D300 you probably won't care. The 6 fps is cool, but I'm used to 8 fps with the D300s battery pack. Those extra 2 fps sometimes mean getting the shot or not for sports/birds.Random remarks: So far, taking movies is easy and fun. Rockwell states that the quality isn't great, but they look excellent when shown on a large led hd tv. I have had no trouble focussing with my 200-400 or any other lens. I don't like it that you can't display both iso and frame count at the same time. The lcd info display on the top of the body seems fine, in contrast to criticisms by other. What I'm really upset about is that neither Nikon or Adobe have updated Camera Raw for phototshop CS4, so you can't use the D7000's NEF files with CS4. Maybe Nikon gets a cut from Adobe for CS4 - CS5 upgrades, which I purchased reluctantly. Nikon's ViewNX2 is good software and loads and displays raw files quickly, but I need to use psd files and, of course, photoshop's + plug-in's features to do real work.At this point, nothing much to contribute until I can get that camera back from my wife. (My D300 healed itself, I did lots of trouble shooting, but don't know why it started to work again.) My recommendation is that if you can afford to shell out about $1.5 - $2K for the body/kit (this price includes battery attachment, sd cards (too easy to lose!), decent case and camera strap [Nikon should get out of the strap business or contract with Tamrac.] buying the D7000's a no-brainer regardless of your expertise and experience.Update, 7/1/11: OK, upgrading to CS5 was worth it, sorry about the conspiracy theory. This is a great camera except that it's destroying my technique because it's so easy to use. With the 18-200 VR and the D7000's low noise at hi ISOs (but keep using Define2.0), I can shed 30 lbs of photo gear and my tripod. It's really fun taking videos and as stated above, the quality's great. And Scott Kelby, notwithstanding, the built-in flash ain't so bad either.

The D7000 is an excellent replacement to earlier Nikon models I have owned. It combines the flexibility of a point and shoot camera with all of the customized features of a quasi professional camera. Having just bought it, I know that it will take many weeks to learn how to use it to its maximum potential. At a subjective level, it feels and handles optimally.

I have a variety of pro photography gear, which I use for my real estate work and for non-profit volunteer photography work. I have been using a D2Xs--Nikon's last generation flagship body, which I paid more than $4,000 for a few years ago--as my primary body and a D70 as a backup/2nd body. I purchased the D7000 figuring I would replace the D70 and continue shooting with the D2Xs as my primary body. I was surprised to discover that the D7000 outperforms and outhandles the D2Xs in almost every way.The focusing system is extremely fast and a marked improvement over the anything else I have used. It is still not psychic, of course, but it does a good job in full auto, and with 38 focus points from which to choose, it offers good flexibility for pinpointing a specific focus point almost anywhere in your image.Battery life is excellent for a non-professional body. I shot 1,300 images with it one day last week. I changed batteries preemptively. The one with 1,300 images on it was still showing multiple bars remaining.Low light performance just blows me away. I try to avoid going higher than ISO800 on the D2Xs due to inescapable noise. I had assumed that the only way to get a meaningful improvement in low light performance would be to get a full-frame body, such as the D700 or D3, but this body represents a major improvement. I can shoot at ISO 1600 and ISO 3200 with very pleasing results. Yes, ISO 3200 or 6400 will display noticeable loss of detail and smearing if you are looking at an images pixel for pixel. But the overall usability of those images is still very good. This is the first body that I have used at automatic ISO, since I can then set shutter and aperture as my application demands, and I can know that the camera can then pick the ISO and still produce spectacular images.The only meaningful drawbacks compared to a true professional body are 1) limited buffer for continuous shooting (but it still fires off several images in rapid-fire sequence), and 2) no built-in second shutter release for shooting vertically. Yes, there are other differences, but most are not important for most folks. For example, being able to get 1,500 images out of the D7000 battery versus maybe 2,500 out of the larger professional body batteries. For the price point, this is quite remarkable.I have not used this for video work yet, but it has excellent capabilities and an external microphone jack. I have seen plenty of samples online of beautiful video work done with this body. If you plan to use it for video, plan to use a tripod and/or to spend some serious money on accessories to help handle this body smoothly. DSLRs are virtually impossible to hold out from your body (far enough to watch the LCD live view display) steady for any length of time.Overall I am extremely pleased and amazed at the high end features for the price point. I give it four stars and not five only because it is not literally perfect, but quite close!

My dad did lots of reseach on good cameras before he got his a couple of years ago. I was in the market for a camera and I looked around briefly, but quickly came to the conclusion that this is an excellent camera for the price you pay. I do recommend only getting the body and lens separately. Research different lens sizes and decide what you really need.

There are several well done and detailed reviews here (B. Fuller +). Please just allow me to add a few considerations.I now have my second D7000. The first one was from the very first batch shipped and several in this batch had focusing problems (many comments on DPReview). With all lenses, and most noticeably at their maximum zoom setting, the focus was terrible. This second camera is perfect. I would guess Nikon fixed a bug in their setup routine (think Hubble :-)A second problem receiving numerous comments concerns "hot pixels" in live view / video mode at high ISO settings and dark surroundings. All sensors have a few pixels that are defective, are mapped, and are "fixed" to look like their neighboring pixels. This makes it a near zero problem. Unfortunately in live view / video mode the D7000 does not "hide" these pixels. My current D7000 has one annoying red pixel that is easily visible about 1/3 of the time on an HDTV monitor when shooting indoors. According to DPReview, Nikon has announced a new firmware release to solve this problem. It is no longer a concern of mine.I have also spent a fair bit of time comparing lenses (Koren 203 lens test chart - plus printed text and fabrics). The unexpected result is that the 18 to 105mm kit lens is nearly equal to my 60mm micro Nikkor D lens in the 18 to 35mm range (f-8). My 70 - 300mm lens (F/4.5-5.6 G IF-ED) was better than the 28 - 300mm (f 3.5 -5.6 G ED VR) in the 70 to 200 range but not quite as good at 300. The 70 - 300 produces equal centers and slightly sharper edges than the kit lens at 70mm and up. All my tests were done using jpg files with the camera setting bumped one notch for both sharpness and contrast. The differences are much less obvious and far less important in real world use. Photos of a large blooming orchid plant look almost equal on 13" x 19" prints when I was careful with the f-stop (if in doubt use f-8).Update: I have tested this camera in various light situations. The dynamic range system works quite well but there are occasions where you can not trust the camera's auto metering. DPReview noted: "Tendency to overexpose in bright sunshine/high contrast situations". A few of my daylight photos confirm that you need to be watchful in bright sun. I would suggest routinely setting the exposure compensation -2/3 rds stop (down) outdoors on a sunny day. There are other suggestions on the internet but this is by far the easiest to remember and undo for me. Nikon did not confirm or deny if they will include an adjustment for this in their firmware release.A video note:The focusing during video shooting tends to hunt and be noisy. The noise is more noticeable when reviewing in camera than on an HDTV system. One solution is to think "producer" and edit together a series of shots instead of continuous shooting.Update: The Sennheiser MKE 400 Shotgun Microphone was a nice addition for video. The focus noise becomes less noticeable and the quality is very good. The mic is quite compact and does not make the set up look too over the top. It seemed better to use a medium mic sensitivity (2) than AGC when shooting.Within the camera setup there are a number of focus options including changing the delay time before the camera tries to refocus (0 delay and 5 other options). There are many other options including subject tracking and facial recognition. The method I am currently using is to set it to center refocus when I half press the shutter release. I have made the mistake of fully depressing it though, and that terminates recording. If you are primarily interested in video the Panasonic GH1 / 2 is more designed for that. The D7000 is spectacular still camera first, and capable of beautiful video when carefully used second.A personal bias:I believe the D7000 is capable of more than many of the Nikon DX lenses are delivering. Great lenses are a strength of Nikon, let's keep the heat on them to design lenses that maximize the images from their DX cameras too.

I love this camera for the several functions that it has. It takes beautiful photos and also the lens is very bright!The weight is not so tremendous, it's just an habit matter!

Although the camera is ok, it was a long time later when the battery was dead that I realized they had sent me the wrong charger and now I have a $1200 camera that won't charge. I tried to buy a travel charger and it isn't working on the camera either. Extremely disappointing. The time passed too quickly to return it or ask for a replacement and now I am stuck!

Pros:Performance in low light is superb.Build quality is as good as professional level DSLRs.Custom mode dial is very useful.Small changes in layout from D90 are great.Infrared thingy on the back makes using the remote easier.Cons:Video auto-focusing is a marketing gimmick and just does not work in real world situations. In addition, the mic picks up the AF sounds and it is very loud. You would have to use a mic off-camera. I even bought an on-camera directional mic, but it still picks up the sounds to the point of being useless. But the audio issue is a moot point really, as the video AF is of little use. Nikon should focus on competing with Canon for video market share by matching Canon's bitrate and framerate levels rather than by touting video AF. Pros don't use video AF anyway.!!! The lack of a recording indicator light on the front and little indication on the back means you will have no idea when the 20 minute recording limit is reached when using it on a tripod without someone behind the camera. If you are planning to use the D7000 to record family gatherings, you are going to be frustrated and disappointed. I actually missed the first laugh of my infant son because I thought it was recording, but it wasn't! A simple light and a beep when it is done seems like a complete no-brainer and I can't imagine why Nikon did not include this feature on this or the D7000.Included software is not very good. Okay, Nikon's software sucks. It is a complete mystery how they rationalize charging $200 for a half-baked remote capture application (Camera Control Pro), when Canon includes something better for free! I scratch my head a lot when thinking about Nikon's strategies.Check your camera for backfocusing before the return period ends! This is widely reported, but Nikon has not owned up to it. I had to send mine in for service for a severe backfocusing problem. The entire service experience ranks up there with my Worst Nightmare Experiences Ever. Nikon's Customer Service is bad, bad, bad- infamously so. I won't go into the details here, but let's just say I came very close to selling my Nikon gear at a loss to switch to Canon. But they just make such darn great cameras!Final Analysis:The best prosumer DSLR Nikon has ever made. It's class performance is second to none. Video looks great but is frustrating to use without an indicator light. Backfocusing problems should be checked for right away. If this is your first camera and you are considering the Nikon/Canon question, ask yourself how important customer service is to you. Canon=good, Nikon=bad.

Battery lasts incredibly long. Images are sharp, even in low light using a high ISO. The HD video feature is really nice to have too. Being able to take videos using all of the compatible lenses is a huge benefit. I upgraded from a Nikon d40x, and this was a big step forward without adding much weight or bulk to my camera bag. The live view feature is really helpful. Many of the settings can be adjusted with dials or buttons, so you don't really have to spend much time in the menus.

I have now sent my camera in to Nikon USA's repair department in El Segundo twice. It may go back a third time if the power fails again like it did this weekend.On paper, this is one killer camera. The frame rate is good enough for action/performancesThe focus (if you get a good one or manage to get yours fixed properly) is pretty darned good, and compares quite well to other brands. It's not quite up to D300/D700 performance, but in all but the dimmest light, it tracks quite well. The color tracking, which incorporates info from the 2000 pixel meter, works a charm as long as you're not into the extremes of the color temp scale.The buffer is a bit small, but the speed at which is writes to the memory card actually compensates quite a bit. I'd say it writes to the card 50% faster than my D700, with the fastest cards I have around (45mb/s UHS-I SD and 90mb/s CF).The shutter is incredibly quiet and there are things I can shoot with this that I wouldn't dare with the D700, because the mirror in the D700 is so bleedin loud.This may have the best APS-C sensor I've used.But at the end of the day, I'd really have trouble recommending this camera, simply because it took two repairs and months of testing/arguing with Nikon to get an appropriate fix.If it came to me the way it is today, without the hassle I've been through, I might give it a full five stars. But if you take into consideration the entire package including Nikon's customer service, and the time I've spend fussing with missed/OOF shots and sending the thing off, I have to deduct at least two stars.I know enough to be able to diagnose the defects and was able to make images which demonstrated the issue for the repair department. For the average customer who's not technically inclined or willing to deal with such a finicky piece of gear with manufacturing defects, it just isn't worth it.If your time is money, don't bother with this camera.