Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Nikon D7000 Body

It's an older model these days, the D7100 ha come out to take it's spot, but the price of the D7100 is a lot more.If you are new to photography, and want something to grow into which is a bit more beyond the current entry level cameras, then you'll do well to get hold of a D7000 while saving money from features on the D7100 that you won't yet understand or appreciate.They money saved could go a long way towards buying better lenses which is where quality will really shine through for you.

I write so many negative reviews it is a plaesure to writ a 5 star review. All reviews are subjective by the nature of the beast. You may find problems in my appraisal of this camera, so take it with a grain of salt.Cons:Unless you are a professional photographer you will find the Nikopn supplied User's Manual (as usual) useless. There are many excellent manuals/dvds on this camera, so don't worry about it. My package arrived on time with the camera body. Whether it is the fault of Nikon or the supplier, the warranty on the camera was missing. If you have excessive patience and a high frustration capability you can try Nikon Customer Service. Not me--I have tried. At my age there is not so much time to waste so I will cross my fingers. If, like me, you need instructions I will be reviewing the aids later.Pros:This camera is terrific. I began using a point and shoot digital about 7 years ago, switched to a wonderful Sony, and was so impressed by that I went on to a digital SLR Nikon D5100. Great camera, but I wanted more control so the D7000 was chosen.to say I am pleased is an understatement. Once you learn the basics this camera will do anything you want and things you never dreamed of doing. I would like it if the LCD viewer moved like the D5100 but that ius something I am willing to overlook. The durability of this camera is profound; take it from a clumbsy photographer. The camera allows you control over everything from disabling the in-camera flash to ISO to shutter speed to white-balance to focus point and much more. You can take beautiful pictures of any and everything. I do a lot of macro and this is great! Replace the Nikon neck strap and you are safe and secure.I have read of people using the D90 (this camera's predecessor) for twenty years and I believe my heirs will ahve this for at least that long.If you buy this wonderful camera and a decent manual for its functions, you can be a great photographer with a little practice. I have had mine for only two months and am thrilled. Good shooting.

Upgraded from a D5000, which is a super camera for learning. The menu and buttons/dials is still something to get used to and the lens is okay, I'm a prime lens fan but my wife needs a basic zoom. Wish I would have upgraded sooner, but glad I didn't wait longer. Decided that I wanted a D7000 vs the D7100 as I shoot swimming and sports and didn't want to have issues others have reported with the newer model. So far I'm 100% happy, had fulfilled by Adorama always a great experience with those folks.

I am a prior Nikon n8008s and D300 user and love this camera! I researched the crap out of many cameras in this category to include the Canon 7D, the new 60D, T3i and Nikon D700 and D90. My budget was around $1500 and I wanted the most bang for the buck.Weight:The D7000 is hefty with lense attached and this may be a turnoff for some. For me, the first time that i picked it up, I knew that I was holding on to something. The weight and construction feels like it could take quite a bit of abuse as compared to many of the Canon models which feel too light and less durable. For long excursions, the additional weight may become uncomfortable without a proper sling or pack - I can live with that. The magnesium body construction looks like it could take a bullet and still take great pictures.Construction:As stated above, this body is tough. Weather sealed for moisture and built to take some abuse.Ergonomics:For past/current Nikon users, the D7000 feels very familiar in your hands. Even though there are many new dials and buttons as compared to earlier models, with a little practice quick changes/adjustments will become second nature.Ease of Use:As stated in my title, all of the extra buttons, wheels and displays may be a little intimidating for entry-level/novice buyers. Especially one with moderate experience with point-and-shoots. But, even though this camera is loaded with features, many of the factory setting included by Nikon can take a lot of the guesswork out of initial picture taking. My 9 year-old daughter takes excellent pictures on "Auto". My wife even takes great pictures and she takes horrible pictures with everything else!Accessories/PortsThe twin memory card slots were a big selling feature with me. You can program the camera to utilize the slots individually. I have one card slot set up for only taking pictures and the other card for taking video. The camera does not come with a USB connector (mini-USB), mini-HMDI, or an external power cord/charger. The only way to charge the battery is to remove from camera and plug into supplied battery charging adapter (all setting are saved upon removal) - I used my battery for an entire 7-day cruise without recharging. For any of you with older Nikon SB-XX flashes, it will take a little fine tuning to get them to work with the camera - but they will work. I would recommend purchasing a Class 10 SD card if you plan on shooting any video.Pictures/video:This thing takes great pictures! Even though the megapixels (16.2 versus 18 for Canon 60D) may be a little lower than some of the other newer models, not a big deal. The viewfinder has 100% coverage of the subject area as compared to the Canon models which only offer 96% coverage. Even though this may seem like a miniscule amount, it could mean the difference between a poorly cropped photo or one suitable for framing. Video shooting is easier with this camera versus the Canon 60D because of control placement. Although the D7000 isn't the same as the D3x when it comes to low light shooting, it performs exceptional. Low light video shots suffer from slight pixelation though. The LCD screen is large and bright, but the addition of a fold out/swivel screen would have been nice.Included Lens:The included lense (when the package is bought - you can buy body only) compliments the body well. Color accuracy and exposure are pretty spot on with a decent amount of dynamic range. If you have the extra money, better glass is always worth the investment.FINAL VERDICT:The D7000 offers a lot of features, speed and technology for the price. If you have other Nikon D-SLRs, the lenses are interchangeable. Even my lenses from a much older n8008s work excellent with the new body. I would buy this camera again and definitely recommend to others looking for a high quality, durable camera that takes outstanding pictures.

There are lots of excellent cameras to choose from and simply throwing a dart at a board with Canon and Nikon DSLR's will get you a great camera. But for the "crop sensor" shooter looking for great performance this is arguably the best option.Technically its sensor is the highest rated (DxO Labs) but in practice I don't see dramatic or even noticeable differences in image quality between this or any other current DSLR camera. They all capture great images. What the D7000 does that sets it apart from lower end models is: 1). Meters & Focuses accurately and instantaneously and 2). Offers every conceivable adjustment at your fingertips. There is no waiting around for 1/8 second for a focusing light to "beep" because depressing the shutter release handles that instantaneously. And the ergonomics keeps digging into menus to a minimum.IMAGE QUALITY vs. D5100 or D3100: No difference. At most its sensor gives you about 1/3 f/stop compared to the D3100 that I don't consider significant.LENSES MAKE THE DIFFERENCE: A good "walk-around" lens would be Nikon's 18-105vr that gives good zoom range for most shots and delivers very good IQ with adequate light. The best images can be captured with Nikon's 35mm 1.8G or their 50mm 1.8G.CONS: Size- It is bigger and heavier than a D5100 or Canon T3i. For some the smaller size/weight could be an advantage. Personally I miss the smaller size of the D3100 that I consider the best value in high quality DSLR cameras based on image quality, ergonomics and its Guide Mode for beginners. Cost- The D7000 is an excellent value at its current price but the value shopper wanting to spend less might look at the outstanding D5100 body only (same sensor as D7000) or the D3100 with 18-55vr for just under five hundred dollars. I have not used the new D3200 but the higher cost and pixel count (vs. D3100 or D5100)does not make it a better buy. The D5100 is a better camera than the D3200 and the D3100 is the best bang for you buck.The real advantage of going with Nikon or Canon is the availability of a wide selection of great lenses.

I got it weeks before they said I would, and that was good, I have been taking pictures with it and everything works very well so far,but it has only been a short time

I have had this camera for a while, and it was the natural upgrade to my baby dslr - the nikon d60. This camera has been solid and continues to deliver some of my best work. Definitely one of the best Mid range dslr's out there. Though I got it close to its release date, the camera for me continues to perform and I have not serviced it even once yet!

I bought my Nikon D7000 about a year ago after having owned a Nikon D90. The D7000 is an excellent camera and, as far as I can tell, it could only benefit of a slightly larger MP count and better high ISO performance, hence the 4 stars only. But for its price tag, it is fantastic. I have some examples of my photos in my blog ([...] and some more in 500px ([...] If I could switch for a different camera it would only be for a full frame D800.

A significant step up from my old Nikon D80 which I basically used a point and shoot camera. I plan to go a bit deeper into digital photography with the D7000. So far I am very impressed with the photographic magic that comes built into this amazing camera.

I wanted to buy a one time DSLR camera for at least couple of years.This is my first DSLR,but i used canon T3i and Nikon D5100 from brother and friends.Initially i wanted to buy first Nikon D5100 and after seeing lots of positive reviews of Nikon D7000 I bought this package..I was very enthusiastic after receiving it and wanted to use in my all trips.Photos taken in Auto mode are too bad, all photos had more white shades.I am not sure after paying $14++ how come Nikon could not even make right Auto mode .However, I stopped using auto mode and tried Manual mode,but after trying all White balance settings ..Photos are still worst...My Canon SD450 small camera photos are far much better than this DSLR..I am not sure its defective one which i have received or its camera problem..I am very unhappy after buying this camera...At least in D7000 case,I learnt that sometime quality doesn't come by paying more money for camera..I need to be more careful what it deserves for that prize.....I have to look for another camera now after some months..i stopped using this and will use my canon SD500 now onwards...Atleast i can take decent photos in auto mode.

I've been a Nikon owner over 30 years and was hopeful that the negative reviews regarding the autofocus on the D7000 was limited to a few defective cameras. Much to my dismay, I received one with the same problem. The camera had a tendency to focus on the background and not the subject clearly aimed in my viewfinder. The camera did not always do this, but often enough where I decided to return it for a full refund. It's too bad this camera has this problem, because when the autofocus did work properly, it took terrific photos. I'm giving this review 2 stars for Amazon's quick response in providing refund to me. Thanks Amazon!

I had a D5100 and exchanged it for the D7000, which was back focusing, making many images (especially those at close range) soft. If the D7000 focused precisely out of the box, as it's supposed to, I would have kept it, since I liked all of the other features it has. All of my photos from the D5100 were sharp using the same lenses, so the lenses weren't the problem. I tried AF fine tuning and it helped a little, but not enough, even after reaching the maximum adjustment factor. A camera at this price level should have better quality control. Sure there are manufacturing tolerances, but they should be able to get the most critical assemblies close enough so the camera at least focuses properly, rather than hoping that customers won't notice or requiring them to spend hours fine tuning the AF, sometimes to no avail. It seems like getting a good D7000 depends quite a bit on luck. I've yet to decide if I'll try another D7000 or if I'll just go back to a D5100.The D7000 also overexposes in bright/high contrast situations when using matrix metering, causing highlights to be clipped and detail to be lost. Some say that this is just the advanced metering system working as intended. Perhaps, but it requires the user to use negative exposure compensation whenever a shot like this is taken (or to program it into one of the "U" settings). You don't always have time to do this when a a good photo op comes around. IMHO, this is a significant flaw that should be corrected via a firmware update.BTW, some have stated that the D7000 has better IQ than the D5100. All reviews I've read state that they are exactly the same in IQ, or that the diff is so small that it's negligible. This is consistent with my experience. In certain situations, like sports and low-light fast motion shots, the D7000's better AF and metering might help produce better photos, but for everything else, they're pretty much the same.UPDATE: I decided to give the D7000 another chance and ordered a second one. Same backfocusing problem. This time, adjusting the AF fine tuning by a factor of -4 for all of my lenses results in sharp focus, but using AF fine tuning isn't an ideal solution, since it causes the camera to not focus properly at infinity or at minimum focusing distance. Depending on the degree of AF tuning required, this could then require the user to manually adjust the focus ring after the AF has "reached its limit" (the limit which has changed due to the use of AF fine tuning). Another unnecessary hassle you need to remember to take care of. The AF fine tuning feature is nice to have, but its purpose is to dial-in lenses that are a bit off due to manufacturing tolerance. I don't think it was intended to adjust a faulty body to work with lenses that are in spec, but that's the way it's often being used.For anyone who buys a D7000, I'd recommend doing a focus test as soon as you get it, to ensure that you're getting the IQ you paid for. The best way to do this is with a focus test chart, but a quick and dirty method is to tape a page of text on the wall (make sure it's totally flat against the wall). Then, mount your camera on a tripod perpindicular to the wall, with lens (set at the largest aperture) at the same height as the page. Take a shot or two using autofocus through the viewfinder. Use the remote or self timer, with mirror lockup. Then take some shots using live view. If the AF photos are not as sharp as the LV shots (or at least very close to them in sharpness), your AF is off (most likely back focusing).

Recently I bought a Nikon D7000 for Nikon's name and returned it for its bad quality.Before last Thanksgiving my friend helped me to order a Nikon D7000 with 18-200mm zoom from Costco. We had good price - $1699.99 ($2049.99 - $350 rebate) from Costco.At first I loved it and I even bought a Nikkor 10-24mm, filters and remote control for it. The camera is less three months old and only took 115 pictures. And I found problem about this D7000.According to D7000 manual, after a full charge it can take 1050 photoes (Nikon's standard is much higher - 4500 photoes each charge). But In my D7000's first run it only took 115 photoes after the initial full charge. Battery meter said the battery's age is 0 (means barrery is brand new) and battery meter is only 1% with 115 pictures taken . This is a brand new D7000 with brand new battery, the battery life is only 10% of D7000 manual specified. I do not know this is a camera's problem or a battery's problem.In order to solve this problem. I searched manual and could not find a phone number. Late I found a 800 number from web and called, the service person could not advise what I should do - seems he do not know D7000 at all. I posted questions in Nikon's web site but they send me a mail talking about somethings else - seems they even have not read my questions at all. I updated my question several times but no further response.Today (Feb 13, 2012) is the last day I can return my D7000 in Costco, so I went to Costco. At first I just wanted to exchange the questionable D7000 but they told me I cannot exchange it. Then the service gay said Costco could return me a full price of $2049.99 that makes I can buy a same camera with today's market price. Late Costco guys took their words back (so bad for Costco because they can eat their word just in a few minutes ) and only agree to return me $1699,99- that is not enough to buy another D7000 with lens today. Because today is last day I can return, I asked if Costco can extend the return period for a few days that makes me can call Nikon again. Costco guy did not agree to give me a few more days. So I returned this bad Nikon D7000 with lens immediately. Next I need to returm my Nikkor 10-24mm lens and filter because it is uselee without D7000.NIkon is a well known company. I do not know why they allow this kind of expensive camera to go to market with problem and do not provide good customer service. Or Nikon do know the Nikon D7000 sold in Costco has quality problem so Nikon gave $350 rebate to lure customers to order. Or Nikon' Thaland factory does not has ISO qualily control system.By the way this camera and lens are made in Thaland. And I have a 18-105mm lens made in Thaland which coating is very bad. Does Nikon Thaland provides qualfied products?

I ended up buying a slightly used but almost new one on e-Bay because they were not available at Amazon at the time and since I live abroad I saved quite a bit on duty on a used item vs a new one. In any case it is a very very nice camera with more features than I know how to use. My previous camera was a D70 so it was a bit of an upgrade. If you are just going to buy a couple of modern zooms such as the 18-200mm VR or the 18-105mm VR or only lenses with built in focus motors then I would buy the D5100. But if you are an old guy like me who is used to film cameras then the D7000 is really great with the older manual focus lenses. I have a nice Vivitar series one zoom (version 3 by Komine) and it works very well with the D7000. I also have the Nikon 16-85mm VR and the Nikon 70-300mm VR but I think aside from these two I will use older AIS lenses since they are available for very reasonable prices. I don't really mind manual focus vs AF but I do like VR since when you are older you can't hold the camera as still as you would like and you miss too many shots if you have to set up a tripod. All of Nikon's dslr's take nice pictures but if you want the maximum selection of lenses then buy the D7000. The D7000 also has many features that I still need to learn about since I have only had the camera about a month. I used to have a Nikon 18-105mmVR that was stolen along with my D70. In spite of it's plastic mount which many people don't like, but it took very nice pictures. I am a big fan of modern digital cameras but I don't like the point and shoot cameras. If my budget was very limited I would buy a good used D40 and the 18-105mm VR which would take way better pictures than any point and shoot. In any case I was very surprised how well the D7000 works with older AIS lenses which is something not mentioned too much in the other reviews. This is something to seriously consider when deciding whether or not to buy the D7000. I also considered an FX camera but with an FX camera you start spending too much money for just a hobby and the D7000 takes very nice pictures that will make the great majority of users very happy. Also the high ISO of the D7000 makes up for not having an FX to a great extent. The only thing the D7000 lacks is built in VR which would be a useful feature as many lenses don't have it. Built in VR is the one thing that might tempt me to upgrade from the D7000. Update: I've been looking at the reviews of the new Pentax K5. It seems to have the same ISO performance of the D7000. By having a built in anti-shake mechanism you can save quite a bit on lenses with the K5. For example the Nikon 70-210mm F2.8 VR costs more than the K5 and the Tamron 80-200 F2.8 put together. If the D7000 had built-in VR you could save well over a thousand dollars on one lens alone. I guess Nikon wants to make money selling VR lenses.

Be aware that there is a big question mark on Nikon's quality control on the production of this specific model the Nikon D7000. I've seen a lot of people complaining from a variety of manufacturing defects in this camera, ranging from hot pixels to a softness due to focus issues.I went to a store and I tried a display model of the camera. I was impressed about the quality of pictures taken at ISO 4000! I was speechless seeing very sharp and vivid pictures produced at that high ISO which is like a day and night compared to my aging D80. I was sold and asked the sales man to bring me a body only. I assumed that the new camera he was selling me will function the same, I was wrong!After getting home, I started taking pictures with my new D7000, then this feeling of dissatisfaction and unhappiness started to develop inside me. A closer examine of the pictures showed a halo around dark objects and softness in the picture and most of the time, the camera was unable to even focus on the target and it was still taking pictures. I tried everything possible with this camera, I tried fine tuning the lens with no use, I updated the firmware to the latest but without any improvements. Last nail in the coffin was to directly compare this camera ISO performance and sharpness against my D80!!the rules were like this:Nikkor 50mm 1.8DManual shooting was selected, ISO 2000 and 1.8 was the lens openness.1- D80 in those conditions was able to take optimum image at lens speed of 1/30 of a sec. which is fare compared to the camera old model and conditions of light. Noise was acceptable and color reproduction was terrible. Which is really the limitation of the D80.2- D7000 in the same conditions was only able to take the picture at a lens speed of 1/20 of a sec!!!! which is even slower than my aging D80. Noise levels were as high as of my D80 and Sharpness was lacking. The image was soft and even my D80 was able to take sharper images at lower resolution.I took the camera back to store and after they tested it for few seconds, they were agreeing with me that the camera I bought was defected. I was refunded with store credits and i'm saving them for the D800.The D7000 is very good camera when it's not defected. The Images taken were really really sharp at even ISO 4000. I liked that and I liked the vivid pictures that this camera is able to take at high ISO. Also I liked the out of focus background taken buy this camera, it's not going to give you the same bokeh you get from a full frame sensor but still that out of focus background was much better than what my D80 can do.I don't recommend buying this product online. If you're intending to buy this model, buy it from a store and try the camera you're buying to check against known issues. You'll be saving yourself a lot of time and frustration.

I was so excited to upgrade from my D80 to the D7000. I got this on AMazon in June and started taking pics right away. After about 2 months I noticed that I was deleting a lot of my pictures and just wasn't happy. What was wrong? I tried all the different settings and went from 39 points to 9 to a single focus point and still wasn't happy with any of them. I contacted Nikon in Oct and they said to send it in. Well, I take pictures semi-professionally and had a really busy season. I couldn't be without the camera. I dealt with it and was able to send it in on Dec. 18th. Nikon said they upgraded software and cleaned it and sent it back. Still the same problem...back focusing. I never knew where it was going to focus but I knew it wasn't wear I wanted it. Sometimes behind the subject and sometimes to the right. I immediatelty called Nikon. I had to go thru the settings over the phone and finally I sent them 3 images showing the problem. Nikon sent me a return label and I sent it on Jan 14th. It is now Feb 5th and still no camera. I have contacted Nikon many times but you are never allowed to speak to the service dept directly. Notes keep getting put in my file and I'm told to wait for an email.. The thing I'm most angry about is that they're saying they can't find a problem. If they would only use the camer with a real lens they would see the problem. I have reported them to the Better Business Bureau. I have no idea when I'll get my camera back and it probably still won't work right.

The camera was not in the condition I was expecting. The battery door on the bottom of the camera could fall off easily. It was clearly forced off the camera and put back on. The power button on the top of the camera was difficult to move into and out of the on/off position. Not the condition I expected.

I bought a D7000 package in Nov 2012 to replace a D70 and have been disappointed since. As a Nikon fan after owning an analog Nikon F3 i've had one disappointment after another. Excessive delay caused by the lame auto focus system. Not taking a picture because of the auto focus, forcing manual mode most of the time. It would stop working with a memory card error warning when there was nothing wrong with the card and this is after the latest firmware upgrade. Dim viewing screen makes it useless in sunlight of any brightness, this a serious flaw, Nikon should supply a hood with viewing lens or fix the dim LCD screen. skipping frames when taking a video shot of complex images. The D7000 is really only as good as $200 point and shoot. I've lost some important shots and had to retake many pictures because of this very poor camera. It has the most impossible to use menu system, it's about as intuitive as a Greek cookbook and about a s useful. I don't recommend anyone buying this Nikon or the D7100 which i'm sure have the same issues.

This is a review from an avid amateur user. Some people probably wonder the purpose of this "upgrade", since both D5100 and D7000 share the same sensor. It is obvious that D7000 has a tougher and heavier body. However, my main reason for the upgrade is the quality of picture. Really! From comparing and analyzing pictures taken by both cameras, I notice that pictures from D7000 are sharper and have more contrast, especially under less-than-perfect shooting conditions. The difference is from the better 39-point focus system of D7000. Under bright light, the picture quality should be very similar, if not the same. However, under low light and less contrast condition (such as foggy days), the difference is very noticeable. The D7000 performs very well and focuses accurately. Therefore, the pictures are sharper and exposed more accurately. In addition, I believe the heavier weight also play a part in sharper pictures due to less "handshake". Of course there are some personal shooting techniques and habits that can play a part in picture quality. However, this is the result from my personal experience. Furthermore, even though D7000 is heavier (than D5100), I don't feel sore or stress on my neck after half a day's shooting. It doesn't hurt either that the price on D7000 is dropping to an affordable level. The D5100 is still very good, easy to use, and an excellent entry into DSLR. However, the D7000 gives me the confidence and comfort of making something spectacular. I dare to dream.

I had a D3100 with the kit lens and when I was looking to upgrade to a 18-200mm lens, I found this camera for $996. I decided to sell me D3100 on eBay (got $400) and bought this camera with the 18-105 kit lens, the price difference being the same as it would have cost me for a refurbished 18-200mm lens.My D3100 was a great camera but the D5XXX and the D3XXX leave you wanting more. I am no where near a professional photographer and enjoy taking pictures as a hobby but my D3100 did not have the advanced controls the D7000 has and to really learn the photographic process having those control is much more enjoyable. If you like putting your camera on auto and taking pictures save the money and get the D3XXX or the D5XXX. For the price the D7000 is the best camera from Nikon.I did a lot of research prior to buying the camera and it seems the majority of the people who gave a bad review that didn't actually have a broken camera didn't take the time to get used to using the camera. The camera is complex and learning the features takes time but is very fun to use.The picture quality is spectacular.

After having a Nikon D90 we chose this model and, so far, it has been an excellent choice that i recommend

Upgraded from d40. I was originally hesitating and thinking of waiting for the next update. Also considered the d600 but dont have any fx glass yet anyway. Glad I pulled the trigger on this black Friday deal.Loving this camera and have no regrets. Didn't realize how much I really wanted an upgrade till I had this in my hands.Pics of Christmas came out better with less effort then the d40 could pull off. Love how easy it is to change settings on the fly. Love the additional WB adjustments i didnt even know about especially just choosing a kelvin temperature.Can't wait to learn about and play with the more advanced adjustments available and kinda feel like i did when i first got my d40 and knew absolute nothing about photography. :)While I wasnt previously interested in video, it is pretty fun to play with HD video with nice lenses. Autofocus is pretty much useless though with video, and u really are better off just doing it manually.Got the kit for under 1k and thought I might sell the kit lens before I got it. So far I like it and will probably keep it too for now. At only 100$ more then the body alone, why not?Bought some fx lenses too with the combo discounts offered at black Friday and my next body upgrade will probably be to FF although really speaking this camera is probably all I really need. We all know how that itch develops as we slowly outgrow our equipment though so who knows :) In the mean time, I'm really glad I got the d7000 an would recommend it to anyone trying to make the same decision as me. For the time being, I figure I will get better results with fx glass on a dx body then the other way around.

This camera has about 20+ bells and whistles more than my old one.I picked the D7000 over the D7100 because at the time, there was a $400 price difference and in comparing the cameras on about 10 different sites, the D7100 did not have enough to make me pick it over the D7000.That being said, I read a GREAT article where someone compared the D600 (full frame), the D7100 and the D7000 together. The D7100 and D600 were almost identical cameras. The D7000 is a very close runner up, and for $1000 cheaper, I am happy with it.The biggest thing about the DLSR cameras is having a nice lens. Get a good camera, get a great lens.

The Nikon D7000, was brand new in the box as quoted in the advertisement.I was very well, pleased with the package..