Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Nikon D7000 Body

Upgraded from Fuji S9100 the colors saturation is less but very sharp and fast. I use the Nikon 18-55 VR DX with the camera is easy to learn how to use it. Definitely I can see and feel the difference with this camera and for the price cant go wrong unless you get one that have problems with it and that could happen to anyone. I buy the Body only since I don't like the medium zoom lenses.

Bought this for my husband for Christmas last year and he loved the product. Around Thanksgiving of this year the lens wouldn't focus. Just took it to a camera shop and they said the problem is with the lens and we had to spend 400.00 on a new one. We were told sometimes the electronics just stop working from time to time. We are two weeks past the warranty.

I am relatively new in DSLR technology but I've been playing with SLR cameras for over 30 years so I shouldn't say I am completely a novice when it comes to photography. And please, since this is just my personal opinion that I just want to share with others, those who already own D7000 shouldn't feel offended by my review because this is just my personal experience I had with D7000.I first bought D90 but soon switched to d7000 because I only hear good things about it.. Like many of you, I spent days after days searching for just a right camera which can take my photography skill to the next level.Anyway, to make the long story short at first I liked the camera because it takes sharp photos with nice color rendering. I was using nikkor 35mm f 1: 1.8G lens and although it's not the best lens out there it handled the low light condition pretty well. Most of the shots I took came out pretty sharp and bright with almost no noise even at 3200 ISO. However, the more I take the photos I soon began to notice there's something lacking in the pictures. They're well focused, bright, clean and vivid so what's the problem here? The problem is that my photos do not look `natural'. It almost feel as if I am looking at, sort of like photo realistic, well drawn painting or perhaps I should say, `computer animation graphic like you see in Pixar movies. (ex. Toy Story) Of course, with Photoshop tweak that problem becomes even more apparent. If you're not sure what I mean, please go to flickr.com and type D7000 and see if you can tell the difference.But D90, on the other hand, although it wasn't as 'perfect' as I thought(good though, just not perfect) at least it gaves me realistic looking photos. I saw many review clips on Youtube that compare D7000 to D300s and explain the reasons why they think D7000 is a better choice over D300s. Well, I am begining to question if those people at youtube are truthfully being objective in sharing their honest opinion, or if they were smply hired by Nikon to promote and boost sales of new D7000. From looking at the sample photos from different sites it really wasn't hard to tell D7000 and D300s are not in the same level as far as the picture quality goes. Even with heavy photoshop tweaks I still think those photos from D300s still do look like "photos".:Of course, the quality of lens has A LOT to do with it too. I just wish there's more acutal photo comparsion done with same lens with different bodies, or vise vesa and let the viewers come to better understanding with image quality generated by each camera/lens. Some people like vivid colors, some don't--It's very subjective matter. Just comparing the spec between cameras don't really mean much to me, as quality of photo is more important than anything else. For others, other functions like capability of full HD, High ISO, and etc are just as important as image quality. I know some guys in Youtube said image quality of D7000, when comapred to that of D300, looked "at least" the same or in some cases, better. In my honest opnion, that is not true. D300s is better when it comes to image quality. When I look at the details from D7000 and D300s, it's sharpness is kind of like comparing it to "Pencil vs. 0.3 mechanical pencil.Don't get me wrong, Nikon D7000 in my opinion, is a good camera. Many people also choose D7000 because of full HD capability. I was certainly one of them. But after all, I am buying a camera, not a camcorder. I mean, taking a great looking shots certainly weighs more than multi-function camera. Again, D7000 is a good camera. D90 is good too consider it's value. But I don't think it is equivalent with D300s as some claim. I came to a conclusion: You get what you paid for.

Having owned Nikon cameras and lenses for just under fifty years, very little surprises me about Nikon. But the D7000 is truly amazing! It is my fourth Nikon digital camera (my D70 still works) and got it due to a price reduction through Amazon. I expected the D7000 to be good but was surprized beyond expectations! In spite of it's advanced technology, the learning curve for this camera was not too steep. It did help that I read up on it after I ordered it so I was at least familiar with it. Also, I checked Ken Rockwell's web site to see what he had to say about it (very positive). The D7000 practically thinks for itself! It's tempting to just set it on "Auto" and do everything from there. But I like to set the Aperture, Shutter Speed, etc myself and just have fun with it. I am NOT a professional so I shoot pictures for the sheer joy of it. One tiny reason that I decided to buy this camera even though I really didn't need it is that I have Nikon's SB-600 Speedlight. By setting the camera's flash control to "Commander", it gives me wireless TTL flash using the SB-600 (just like the D70). Having used Nikon film cameras for as long as I have, it means I have a few Nikkor lens sitting around. They can be used with the D7000, just let it know the lens information and you're all set. If all you need for your photography needs is a Point-and-Shoot, then get one. But if you want to have a little fun and get good results, get the D7000! I recommend it!

This product is very good and useful. I like how its made, I recommend this product to everyone. You won't regret buying it.

This is the best non professional camera Nikon offers... I like the LCD cover and wish the D7100 had it too...

Is a very good camera if you can afford it I love it it is an amazing camera and takes great pictures

we've had this camera for almost 2 years now and completely love it. great clarity, easy to use (both for beginners and more advanced users).

First off - I am a very simple amateur user, let me get that clear!If a child or dog was running towards me, my D70 would always focus and get the shot in, beautifully.I AM CONVINCED the D7000 can do this, but it will not focus on or get a good non-blurry picture ever with anything moving. I try in Auto and in Scene/sports. Although why Auto can't handle this mystifies me with it's 39 focusing points or whatever.My D70 was good in all respects. I only ever used it in AUTO or P with Fill-in flash. I can confirm that the D70 did not enjoy being dropped, so I thought it would make sense to do a multiple-generation upgrade.Why can't it make up it's mind quickly and make the shot? WHY doesn't this work out the box? Why does it have an A button if it doesn't really mean it?One final gripe. VIDEO - autofocus is again a disaster (yes I get that it needs to be on a tripod.) It is very happy to stare at a person or an object in the middle of the picture for quite a while and not even bother to try and focus, just keep the red box flashing. So it's clearly aware of the object we are interested in, but cannot manage it. The display is not big enough to show you this mild out-of-focus so you can only discover this problem too late.And seriously - if you are printing at Costco 18", my humble D70 pics were just as good.Finally - the photos are consistently darker somewhat.Good points? Well, the specs are amazing. But it is not for people who think the A button is good enough (it was good enough on the D70).Yes I realize it's buyer beware and i'm sure a lower spec machine would've been better, but I was seduced by the promise of video and 16mp. Thought I was getting a BETTER D70.

after doing much research, i chose this model. it feels great. it works great. i consider myself to be a pro and found no need for what i do to buy anything else.

I have had this body for a few years now and I am still amazed with it. I've shot weddings, portraits and events and love it. Sharp, excellent in low light, It does everything I need and also does a bunch of things I don't. At this price, I'd say get it. Great usability and flexibility. You won't be disappointed.

In this day and age, I'm the type that does countless hours of reading/research before I buy things especially online purchases. Getting into DSLR was a joint decision between my father and I. He wanted a NIKON body so I chose the D7000, and boy am I glad I did. After reading many critical reviews I knew exactly why I wanted D7000. For those that are having a hard time deciding, (my other choices were the Canon 60d and Nikon D5100), here's JUST A FEW points as to why I made the decision to get the D7000.First, let's start off with why you might choose a lower model Nikon, or a comparable other brand like the Canon 60D, T3i, etc:- A cheaper model can save you a lot of $$$, leaving you more room to spend on glass and other accessories.- The Canon's I mentioned and the D5100 from Nikon have the tilt/swivel LCD displays.- Canon is better for video production, as it is more adjustable overall.- Arguably, Nikkor lenses and accessories cost more. Like I said, arguably, as any quality piece of glass is $$$.Now, why I decided to get the D7000:- The feature set and AF system make the extra money worthwhile.- I don't foresee myself actually needing the tilt screen to often. My buddies who shoot with tilt screens almost always have them in the regular position. Would I welcome it? Yes. Do I need it? No.- Dual SD SLOTS! I thought I wouldn't care for this. It wasn't a part of my decision initially but when I got the camera I found that I love this feature. Two cards, with flexibility on how the camera uses them.- U1, U2 custom user settings. Another thing I didn't particularly choose the camera for but once I used them they are golden.- Nikon High ISO performance (including the D5100) is top notch. Enough said.- The only video I will shoot is for cinematics. For this, the 24p 1080p is perfect, as real movies are shot in this format.- Best of all, is the BUILD!!!!! By build I mean everything about the build. Quality, materials, and LAYOUT of buttons and functions. I wasn't used to the layout intially as I "practiced" withCanon's a bunch before, but it is so easy and FLUID to use it really is awesome. Also, I absolutely love the DUAL DIALS (front and back) for adjustments. The clicky dials and singledial layouts leave something to be desired especially on the lower end models. (This of course is personal preference) The ALLOY body feels so planted and durable. It's also more weatherproof than the other camera's I mentioned.Basically, this is priced on the higher end of the Entry-Intermediate cameras, but for good reason. This is a "PROSUMER" product, and is for the serious enthusiast to semi-pro/pro.As a side note, for me it was gonna be the T3i over the D5100 (no full manual exposure on D5100 video) and the D7000 over 60D. After going to a store first to feel the D7000 and 60D it was over.The ONLY thing I was worried about was the back focusing issues people had. I worried for nothing, the focus on my kit lens and 50 1.8G are spot on. I shot a focus chart and the results were as expected. Maybe the firmware has something to do with it? (Mine shipped with 1.02)

I love this camera - that's the bottom line for me. I'm taking a big step up from my first digital camera, the Nikon D40 which my husband wanted so he could start digital photography, and I could not be happier with my choice.However, I think it would be a waste of money for any one not familiar with the adjustments we used to routinely make with 35mm SLR film cameras. The D7000 can certainly function as a fine point and shoot. But why spend almost twice as much on this over the lighter D3100 if you just want to point and shoot, and maybe edit with PhotoShop or some such?For me, it's worth the difference because I want the freedom to quickly and easily make adjustments such as setting aperature or shutter speed to freeze or blur action; adjust the white balance on the fly for what I want the image to be; adjust the autofocus field and metering to suit the particular situation; switch from single shot to continuous, etc. The D7000 puts all that in menus and sub-menus like the inexpensive Nikons, but it also puts it out right on the camera body, available through just one button and the turn of a wheel.Also, this ended up being just about as inexpensive for me as the D3100 because I would not have been satisfied with the kit lens on the D3100 - and replacing it would have been more expensive than using all the wonderful Nikon lenses I have left from the film days - WHICH NOW ALL WORK BEAUTIFULLY ON THE D7000. (Of course, I did get my D7000 for $1,199, not the current prices.) The inexpensive Nikons keep down weight and cost by not including a focusing motor in the camera - you have to rely on one in the lens. The D7000, like other top of the line Nikons, includes its own focus motor. Nice little bonus with the D7000 is its treatment of my old A1 lenses. I have some optically very good, and very fast, A1s. With the D7000, I can program it to recognize them - with just the push of a button and turn of the wheel again. All I had to do was assign a lens number to each of the lenses and provide the focal length and maximum aperture. Now I can use them with no trouble, I just have to focus them as always. And the switch to go from autofocus to manual focus on the old lenses, or an autofocus lens that can't effectively autofocus in the particular situation (like my autofocus trying to pick up a tiny hummingbird in the middle of a rose bush this morning) is conveniently located by the side of the lens where my left hand would be going any way to grab the focus ring for manual focus.This is one really sweet camera. It will do whatever you want. The controls are easy and simple to understand if you have the background in photography - or want to learn.As I said, I think people are wasting their money if they buy this just because it is the new, hot camera when it is really more than they need. But, if you want to be able to control the camera settings, and do it quickly without having to mess around with the camera, this is great.NOTE, after reading other reviews. Nikon DSLRs have never had great video, and this doesn't seem to be an exception - if you want a video camera, get something else. As for complaint about the manual, I think it goes back to my comments about needing to have some SLR experience or being willing to learn. I found the manual completely understandable - it generally even explained each function a couple of times if you read all the way through the several hundred pages of manual. Best way I've ever found to deal with this is sit down with the manual and the camera and really work my way through every setting, button, and dial so I know what I have.

Now that the price has gone down to about $900 for the body, I can heartily say this camera is worth the money. I purchased this camera a year ago and paid the full $1,200 and I'm happy with it, but with the recent price cut, don't think twice about picking this up if you are considering it.Yes, the image quality will be much the same as the D3000 and D5000 series, but the D7000 is infinitely more satisfying to use. It handles better, it has 100% viewfinder coverage, a larger viewfinder magnification, easy access to necessary functions (ISO, White Balance, Image Quality, Metering Mode, Drive Mode, etc), customizable settings, a second command dial, a top lcd, a better build quality, and the list goes on and on. If you appreciate any of this stuff, then don't even consider the other models. If you don't care about any of these things, then yes, you will get just as terrific images from the cheaper models. All you are paying extra for is handling and operation. For me, it is worth it.Both the 18-105 and the 18-200 are terrific lenses. The 18-200 is significantly heavier, although not much bigger, but having the extra reach is nice. Better yet is the 35mm 1.8 DX lens. Yes, it is a fixed lens (no zoom) but it is a total rock star on this camera. I personally loath carrying a heavy zoom unless I have to. I much prefer a smaller prime lens, and this camera feels awesome in your hand with a prime mounted on it.My camera does have the back focus issue, but the good news is that you can adjust for it in the AF fine tune menu in about 5 seconds. Set it and forget it. Yeah, a bit of a blunder on Nikon's part, but the fix is incredibly simple.Happy shooting.

Love this camera! I upgraded from a Nikon D70s and the sum of little features and improvements add up to a big difference. The ability to get info from the control panel on the large monitor is very helpful in low-light situations. Putting the release mode (single shot, multiple exposures) on a separate dial is so much easier than going through the menu. The big monitor is clear and sharp. All my old Nikon lenses work fine. It just feels good in your hands. I think this is the ideal camera for an experienced amateur or a serious hobbyist.

Had very little experience with any manual modes on a DSLR (fear of moving away from Auto mode.. :) )Went through a lot of reviews before deciding to get one instead of the D5200.Its been a month since I have got it and the biggest reasons/features that made me go with this choice were :- Always better to have more than less : There were some people who mentioned this camera to be a mid level camera. This is good for me as I am not expecting to change my camera in the near future :)- 100% view finder : What you see is what you get with the view finder which gives you super confident pics and details.- Dual card memory slot : Its not something I use often but it was a thoughtful option to have since HD video does take a lot of memory- Better body construction : Weather resistant is good but its slightly heavier than the 5200 which was a slight concern for me (some say that it counters the weight of the lens well)Would definitely recommend the D7000.Happy clicking :)

I've been looking for over a year at Nikon digital SLRs. This one is a lighter weight and does everything you could ask for. I do Pet Photography and needed to upgrade from my old Nikon. I have always bought Nikons and love their durability and functions. This one does it all.

THE D7000, this Nikon camera is, just so incredible, every thing works so smooth. I own a Nikon D5100 and I love this camera but the D7000 is like a gem compared to it. The D7000 is so much easier to use, the exposure triangle is so easy to set with out going to menus. The D7000 takes the same great pictures as the D5100 but with better controls and more options.

I've been using a D90 for almost 3 years and just upgraded to the D7000. There are a couple of negatives I noticed right away. On the D90 in single point focus mode I could look at the top LCD display and see which one of the 11 sensors I was using. Then if I wanted to change it I could do so with out ever having to raise the camera up. On the D7000 the top LCD does not show this information, and you have to look at the rear display mode to find out. Another change I'm not happy about is the ISO-Auto feature, (this is not the same as Auto ISO). On the D90 I could add "ISO Senitivity" to "My Menu" and I had complete contol over the menu including the ISO-Auto feature. This is really handy when taking pictures at a show and the lighting is changing every second. On the D7000 I added ISO Sensitivity to "My Menu" but now I can only turn ISO-Auto on or off. On the D90 I could adjust the minimum and maxium ISO and shutter speeds, on the D7000 I can NOT. This is a major pain, b/c now I have to hunt down the menu item everytime I change lenses to adjust the minimum shutter speed. For professionals this might not be a big deal, they just switch cameras, but for the enthusized this camera is aimed at, it's a pain. Something else I noticed was that on the D90 I could change the recording folder name, but on the D7000 I can only change the folder number. For instance, on the D90 I could make a folder that said SHOW, GRAD, GTOR, etc, then when I went home I would know what pictures are in that folder. On the D7000 all I can do is change the folder from 100D7000 to 101D7000, 102D7000, 103D7000 etc. I'm sorry but 102D7000 doesn't tell me anything about what's in that folder. This might not be the correct place for it but the optional battery grip is also not as good as the D90's. On the D90 two batteries where in the grip and no batteries were in the actual camera itself. On the D7000's grip there is only one battery. On the D90 I could kill a battery, pop it out and put in a new one. This made it easy to rotate thru my batteries, now in order to remove the camera battery I have to completely remove the grip. I'm worried that one day I'll kill my grips battery and the camera battery will be dead too, b/c I was in a hurry and didn't have time to change it.There are not a lot of real positives that I see over the D90. True it has a 16MP sensor, 39 point autofocus system, expanded ISO range and a faster frame rate. Not to mention improved video capabilities, but I didn't buy this camera to shoot movies. These features aren't really that impressive. If my D90 hadn't died in a freak 6 year old accident (my son tried to take pictures of his goldfish up close and personal) I wouldn't have bought this camera. Don't get me wrong, it's a great camera and I'm sure I'll grow to love it in time, but if you already have a D90, I would hold on to it for now. Besides in about one year from now Nikon will probably be releasing an updated version(D7100??).

I Love my Nikon D7000, I needed a replacement for my D80. Its the most camera I could buy and I am happy withy it. It is fast, but it all depends on the lens in lower lighting. I definitely recommend it!

I am very disappointed in Nikon quality. I really loved my D7000 until I noticed some out of focus shots a couple of weeks ago. I ran through some focus test at home and everything seemed fine. This past weekend I took my daughter out into a wildflower field and thought I was getting once in a lifetime shots. There was perfect lighting on a nice overcast day all things were perfect for a perfect photo shoot. Once I loaded the images up on my PC and took a look I felt like smashing my D7000 with a sledge hammer. Most of the images suffered from back focus problems.(The flowers behind my daughter were in perfect focus) I ran some test using focus charts and can not correct the problem using fine tuning. I needed a camera and already had the D7000 battery grip so I decided to get another D7000 for $850. The new D7000 has right focus issues out of the box. It is going back and all my Nikon gear is getting traded in on Canon stuff. On a side note, I purchased the D600 last month and it went back within 4 days due to the dust and oil problems. Nikon quality has gone done to the grave. My brothers' made in Japan D40X still runs great after 6 years.

I found after using two of these for about 1.5 years, that the AF was about 80% good if you have decent technique.Oddly enough, it was with wider angle lenses that it was least accurate/consistent.

The Nikon D7000 is not a full-frame, or professional grade digital slr, but it comes very close to being professional grade. I have previously owned the Nikon D70, D40, and most recently D80. This is my favorite of the bunch and is light years ahead of the Nikon D80 it replaced.Like the D70 & D80, the D7000 buttons to adjust the white balance, and iso on the left side of the lcd display as opposed to having to adjust those settings from within the menu of the D3000 & D5000 lines. I will not purchase another digital slr that does not have the ability to manage all my exposure settings from the camera body.The quality is top-notch and produces some truly outstanding exposures. I have now combined the D7000 with the brand new Nikon 70-200 f/4G ED VR AF-S Nikkor Zoom Lens. The results are even better with a professional grade lens such as the 70-200 f/4.Nikon will likely be releasing an update the D7000 line within the next as they have already released newer versions in the D3000 & D5000 lines. The D3200 has already been released and the D5200 has just been released. I am comfortable using the D7000 for quite some time and the next time I upgrade it will be to a full-frame body. For the time being I have a quality kit and will be well prepared for the next couple of years. I do not believe the D7000 will become obsolete any time soon. While it will most certainly be updated the differences will be minuscule.The D7000 is an excellent digital slr and you won't be disappointed with purchasing this camera.

Let me start by saying that I am not a professional photographer. However I do have a good eye for clear pictures and colors. My friends and I have been Nikon users for past few years using D50, D200, and D70. Two of my friends bought D700 this summer and the results just blew me away and now I wanted one too. After spending countless hours on the internet and comparing sample pictures and reading reviews of D7000 and D700, I decided to give D7000 a chance and picked up the kit (just the body was not available) from a local Ritzcamera during the Thanksgiving weekend.So the Sunday of the tgiving weekend, my friend with D700 and I with my D7000 compared our two cameras side by side with same settings (apperture, WB, shutter, ISO, Fine quality, medium size, and other settings) and distance and took pics of a subject (a golden metal peacock with blue and green stones) to compare the results. We used a 35mm 1.8G on D7000 and a 50mm 1.4D lens on D700.The result - the pics on the "camera screen" for D7000 actually looked better than D700 "camera screen". On the D7000 screen the pics looked darker, sharper, and more clean. However, when we transferred the pics on the laptop then the D700 pics looked better. We compared pics on multiple ISO's from 1000 to 64000 and even H1. Each time we made sure the settings were identical. We compared pics at 100% size and D700 pics showed less noise at every ISO and were brighter and more natural in color. All the pics taken with ISO 6400 or higher were much better on D700. We took some face pics and D700 showed more details like skin pores and lip details whereas on D7000 the skin pores and lip details at 100% were not that great..kinda pixels breaking out. Even on the peacock the beak of the peacock was more clearly defined on D700 than the D7000. One thing we noticed that the golden, blue, and green shades on D700 were more vivid and were standing out more. Vice on D7000, the colors were there but didn't highlight as much. After playing with Irfanview software, I edited the saturation on D7000 pic and now the pic had more vividness than D7000. In a nutshell, I had to play with a software to bring more life to the pic.We also tested using the 'auto correct' (or something like that) feature on Irfanview software to see which pics from either of the two cameras require more editing. The result was that D700 required very little to none auto adjustment, whereas, the software corrected/edited almost all the D7000 pics.I am not sure if the larger CMOS sensor on D700 is the only thing that is making a big a difference in picture quality over D7000 or if Nikon hasn't declared any other details. Spec wise D7000 beats D700 on every other detail and D700 technology is 3years old so how come D700 is still delivering better pics than D7000? Is it just the sensor?All in all D700 is a better camera than D7000. But if you don't compare the two then D7000 is not bad. In my situation I have compared the two side by side so I know that I can get better quality pics with D700. So now I am going to return the D7000 and buy D700.The price difference is quiet a bit so for the price the D7000 is not bad, but if you can afford the difference then don't even think about D7000 and go for D700. But if you have a tight budget D7000 will make you happy too.The camera does feel solid, light, and overall great build quality. The menu options are almost identical to D700. Two card slots is a good thing, but really, how often does one run out of memory if you have a decent size card.The video quality at 1080 is great but you would need an external mic since the camera picks up the churning sound coming from the lens while it's trying to focus as you're making the video and it's quiet noticeable. The video feature does not replace the camcorder by any means. If you make long videos, you'll need a camcorder. This feature is rather useful in case where you don't have your camcorder with you and you need to make a quick short video. Also the autofocus feature sucks as it keeps on focusing in and out the moving subjects or as you move the camera.Hope this helps.