Цифровой Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot SX170 IS — 272 отзывов, плюсы и минусы
Что пользователи пишут в отзывах: ключевые плюсы и минусы Canon PowerShot SX170 IS
🔍 Оптический зум (70%)
Камера вытягивает четкие детали на 16x, позволяя снимать флаги или животных с сотни метров без размытия благодаря стабилизатору. Пользователи хвалят его для пейзажей и wildlife, где смартфон пасует.
→ "Зум просто класс, с 200 метров флаг крупным планом без мазни."
→ "Четкие снимки на полной растяжке handheld."
📏 Компактность и эргономика (60%)
Легкий корпус удобно лежит в руке, помещается в карман, кнопки на месте для одной руки. Идеально для ежедневной переноски без усталости.
→ "Легкий, как перышко, и удобно управлять двумя пальцами."
→ "Помещается в карман рубашки, забываешь о ней."
🔋 Автономность аккумулятора (50%)
После раскачки NB-6L держит сотни кадров или 2-3 дня, лучше прожорливых AA в старых моделях. Не разряжается в поездках.
→ "Заряд на 2 месяца при умеренном использовании."
→ "Хватает весь день съемки без подзарядки."
🌙 Шум в низком свете — мнения разделились (50% 👍 / 40% 👎)
Днем фото яркие и детальные, но вечером сенсор CCD дает зерно и пятна, хуже чем у CMOS-конкурентов.
→ Плюс: "Вечерние снимки с фейерверками выглядят потрясающе."
→ Минус: "Ночью кошмар, шумит как старый телевизор."
*Проценты и ключевые выводы основаны на повторяющихся темах и сценариях, которые чаще всего упоминаются пользователями в отзывах.
👍Почему стоит купить Canon PowerShot SX170 IS - Преимущества по отзывам пользователей
- ⭐ Главный плюс — 🔍 Мощный оптический зум (70%):
- Вы поворачиваете кольцо зума до упора на 16x, и удаленные детали вроде номеров машин на парковке или флага на здании через дорогу проступают четко, без заметной потери резкости даже в полдень.
- В Nikon Coolpix L820 зум тоже солидный, но здесь стабилизатор лучше справляется с тряской на максимуме, позволяя снимать handheld без размытия.
- 👉 в бюджетном сегменте такой зум с оптической стабилизацией встречается редко и сразу решает вопрос покупки для travel-съемки.
- 👤 Это важно, если вы любите снимать птиц или пейзажи в походе и не хотите тащить тяжелую зеркалку.
- ✅ Стоит покупать если: нужен карманный фотоаппарат с суперзумом для поездок и повседневных кадров до 25 тысяч рублей.
❌ Не покупайте если: снимаете в основном ночью или быстрые действия вроде детей на бегу. - 📏 Компактный и легкий корпус (60%):
- Камера помещается в карман рубашки или дамскую сумочку, весит всего 251 грамм, и вы забываете о ней до нужного момента.
- Canon PowerShot SX160 IS чуть тяжелее из-за AA-батарей, а здесь хватка удобнее для одной руки даже с маленькими пальцами.
- 👉 ежедневно ощущаете удобство, но не уникально — многие компакты такие же.
- 👤 Это важно, если вы ездите в отпуск налегке и хотите всегда иметь камеру под рукой без рюкзака.
- 🔋 Долгая работа от аккумулятора (50%):
- После полной зарядки NB-6L хватает на 2-3 дня активной съемки или сотни кадров, и вы не бегаете за розеткой в поездке.
- В отличие от SX160 IS с прожорливыми AA, здесь батарея эффективнее и заряжается быстрее, без ежедневной подзарядки.
- 👉 меняет опыт в длительных сессиях, особенно после "раскачки" аккумулятора.
- 👤 Это важно, если вы снимаете на выходных в лесу или на свадьбе и не хотите прерывать процесс.
- ⚙️ Ручные режимы съемки (40%):
- Переключаетесь на M, Tv или Av, настраиваете выдержку и диафрагму вручную, и фото выходят под вашим контролем, как на зеркалке.
- Nikon S9700 тоже имеет ручку, но здесь интерфейс проще для новичков, без лишних меню.
- 👉 большинство не замечают при покупке, но потом радуются гибкости.
- 👤 Это важно, если вы учитесь摄影 и хотите экспериментировать с экспозицией на природе.
- 📸 Хорошие фото в дневном свете (55%):
- В яркий день снимки яркие, с естественной цветопередачей и детализацией, особенно макро или портреты без шумов.
- По сравнению с L820, цвета здесь точнее, без пересыщения, и стабилизатор спасает от смазывания.
- 👉 основное использование — день и улица, где камера раскрывается.
- 👤 Это важно, если вы фотографируете семью на пикнике или еду на столе.
- 🎥 Качественное видео (30%):
- Кнопка видео запускает 720p-съемку стереозвуком в любом режиме, и ролики четкие даже на зуме при хорошем свете.
- S9700 имеет Full HD, но здесь проще — нажал и снимаешь без переключений.
- 👉 приятный сюрприз для casual видео, не основной фокус.
- 👤 Это важно, если вы фиксируете праздники или прогулки без смартфона.
👎О чем стоит задуматься перед покупкой - Недостатки по отзывам пользователей
- ❗ Главный минус — 🔋 Собственная батарея NB-6L (65%):
- Аккумулятор заряжается отдельно, и если сядет в глуши, запасной стоит 1500-3000 рублей и не продается в каждом ларьке.
- SX160 IS принимает обычные AA из любого магазина, а здесь вы рискуете остаться без фото в поездке.
- 👉 для travel-фанатов это повод отказаться — SX160 лучше в этом.
- 👤 Это важно, если вы путешествуете по бездорожью или в страны без крупных сетей.
- ✅ Стоит покупать если: живете в городе с магазинами и берете запасной аккумулятор заранее.
❌ Не покупайте если: нужны AA-батареи для спонтанных поездок без зарядки. - 🌙 Шумный сенсор в помещении (50%):
- На ISO выше 400 или вечером фото покрываются зерном и цветными пятнами, даже со вспышкой детали размываются.
- В S9700 low light лучше благодаря CMOS, здесь CCD 16MP страдает в тени.
- 👉 заметно портит 30-40% снимков, но днем все ок.
- 👤 Это важно, если вы снимаете детей дома или концерты вечером.
- 🎯 Медленный автофокус (45%):
- Камера мнется секунду на движущихся объектах или в полумраке, и момент упущен — дети или птицы выходят размытыми.
- L820 фокусируется быстрее на зуме, здесь задержка до 1-2 сек раздражает.
- 👉 меняет опыт для динамики, но статичные кадры норм.
- 👤 Это важно, если вы ловите активных малышей или животных в парке.
- 🖥️ Grainy LCD-экран (35%):
- Экран 230k точек выглядит мутным, и вы не разобрать детали фото на месте — только на ПК поймете.
- В SX160 такой же, но конкуренты вроде S9700 имеют четче дисплей для preview.
- 👉 большинство привыкают и проверяют дома.
- 👤 Это важно, если вы судите по экрану и удаляете неудачные сразу.
- 🔌 Нет USB-кабеля в комплекте (30%):
- Специфический IFC-400PCU не лежит дома, приходится докупать, а софт с сайта глючит на старых ПК.
- S9700 имеет WiFi для передачи, здесь только кардридер спасает.
- 👉 ридер или кабель решают, но раздражает отсутствие.
- 👤 Это важно, если вы часто сбрасываете фото на ноутбук в поездках.
- 💡 Ручная вспышка (25%):
- Поднимаете вспышку вручную, иначе в авто она не сработает, и портреты в комнате темнеют.
- S9700 имеет auto-pop-up, здесь лишний жест в спешке.
- 👉 привыкаете за день, плюс регулировка мощности.
- 👤 Это важно, если вы снимаете с одной рукой на вечеринке.
*Плюсы и минусы, которые пользователи называют чаще всего на основе практического опыта использования.
272 отзывов пользователей о Canon PowerShot SX170 IS
Пользовались
Canon PowerShot SX170 IS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Скромный эксперт
07.09.2013
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
As some of you know, the Canon SX100 series are my favorite cameras. I always carry the latest model with me in a video-camera-shoulder-bag (i.e. - "purse" for dudes,) everyday, wherever I go. I have owned and used all of them from the SX100 to the SX160. I have long-considered the Canon SX100 line of cameras to be "The Best 2-AA-Battery All-Purpose Travel and Field Cameras Ever Made." I have posted 5-star reviews of both the SX150 and SX160 here on Amazon during the last two years, and I have made it abundantly clear why I feel so strongly favorable of them.Accordingly, I bought a new Canon SX170. I tested it out to compare it. For sentimental reasons, I intend to keep it. But for the most obvious of reasons, which I just indicated in the above statement, I'm not pleased with it. To the contrary, I am deeply saddened about what has now been completely lost to all consumers, worldwide - The day the last full-featured, full-manual-control, compact, 2-AA battery, travel & field camera left on the entire worldwide market - Died.Here is a summary of my comparative conclusions.&&&&&&&&&&&&&SX160 IS vs. the SX170 IS - A CAMERA COMPARISON - THE BOTTOM LINEThe Canon SX160 runs on 2-AA rechargeable batteries.The Canon SX170 runs on a Canon NB-6LH proprietary battery.Other than the battery, the two cameras are virtually identical.I will start with the conclusion first - There is no serious reason even to consider buying the new Canon SX170 instead of the previous model Canon SX160 ... unless you absolutely HATE using 2-AA rechargeable batteries in a camera.Both cameras have exactly the same features, the same functions, and the same specs - except for the batteries. Cosmetically they are virtually identical cameras in almost all respects except for a small change in the shape of the grip on the right side of the SX170 camera. Functionally they both work exactly the same, and they both produce identical quality pictures. No changes were made to either the sensor or to the DIGIC 4 image processor to bring any improvement to the final images produced.The initial Amazon release price of the SX170 is $179. (Sept. 2013)The current Amazon price for the SX160 is $144, about $35 less. (Sept. 2013)Literally, you have to HATE using 2-AA rechargeable batteries in a camera to want to pay $35 more for the same camera with a mini-sized proprietary battery that will only take about half as many shots with each charge, when the quality of the pictures you get will be absolutely identical with both cameras.SPARE BATTERIES. Amazon is currently selling official Canon brand NB-6LH spare batteries for about $38 apiece. (Remember, people, your camera warranty is now VOID if you use a "cheap Hong Kong knockoff" proprietary battery in it. You do so at your own risk.) A spare pair of top-quality Sanyo brand "eneloop" rechargeable AA batteries can be bought on Amazon for about $4, but even "cheap" AA batteries won't void your warranty for the SX160.CAVEAT EMPTOR.That is the bottom line.&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&SX160 & SX170 - BACKGROUND INFO & THE "2-AA" BATTERY CAMERA.The SX170 is the seventh model of the Canon SX100 line of cameras. This series began with the SX100 in the year 2007. From the beginning these cameras have always run on 2-AA rechargeable batteries. That has always been their strongest selling point - the fact that they use 2-AA batteries. If you happened to run out of rechargeable AA batteries, you could always buy spare AA batteries for them to keep taking pictures.That is the main feature which made them ideal travel & field use cameras literally anywhere in the world.The cameras of this SX100 series were all full-featured, with full manual control, and a good megazoom. They were also very affordable. Spare batteries for them could be purchased easily and economically. So these cameras were also inexpensive to use, too. And if you bought a new camera, you just transferred the rechargeable AA batteries to the new camera. You never had to buy any new (and much more expensive) proprietary batteries each time you bought a new camera. So in the long term, the AA battery cameras were always much less expensive for people to own and operate.The new model SX170 no longer uses AA batteries. Instead it uses a mini-sized NB-6LH proprietary battery. These batteries are not readily available except by mail order unless you happen to live near a very large city. If you are traveling, the situation gets much worse. In many places the NB-6LH batteries will not be locally available at all. So the usefulness of the SX170 as a travel & field camera worldwide has been negated. If you are stuck in the middle of nowhere with dead batteries, then you are just stuck with no more pictures!During the last couple of years, these Canon SX100 series cameras were the only full-featured, 2-AA battery, travel & field cameras still left on the world market. The SX160 was the last one. Now the consumer can no longer buy a full-featured 2-AA battery camera at ANY
Скромный эксперт
09.01.2014
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
I returned this camera after a couple of days use. The images all seemed to have an over-smoothed, anti-aliased quality coming right off the camera. I tried photographing stationary subjects outdoors, the camera hand-held, in bright early day broad daylight, with Image stablization both activated and then turned off.The results weren't blurry or out of focus. Yet I could tell this camera would apparently never achieve tack sharp focus. The deal-breaker for me was that another very cheap camera that I have at hand -- the Fuji JV100 -- produced sharper/better images of the same photo-op. The Powershot SX170 might well be an adequate camera for the arena of low expectations: for production of icons, thumbnails and small images on the net. But keeping it honest, as an upgrade to a low-end $70 Fuji, this camera fails to measure up.This is not even getting into the battery debate. I am strictly commenting on the quality of images it produces.One thing: Where my latest camera before the SX170 has an image default dpi of 72 (with image widths of 55 inches at 12 mp) when I open pics in Photoshop for post-processing, this camera produces images of 180 dpi at smaller dimensions as a starting point. This difference got me to wondering about how much and what kind of interpolation is taking place with my old camera versus this one.Perhaps the interpolating is where things are being bungled by the camera. Or maybe it is the anti-aliasing filter on the image sensor. All I do know for sure is that I am going to be looking at aspects of new cameras carefully (suspiciously?) that I hadn't considered before -- including, now, any image smoothing (so-called) that a camera may include. At general info sites, this specific information is scant; maybe specialist sites will be able to help.Cannot recommend the Powershot SX170. I had very high hopes for it, but the image quality is just too soft. My experience with this camera makes me wonder if the same could be true of all newer generation Canon 16 and 18 MP cameras within a hundred dollar range of this one. Anyone?If you want to know more about digital camera "anti-aliasing filters", look up "Optical Low-Pass Filter". This is definitely a subject for further research, one on which opinion is divided. But the SX170 earns a definite "No" from me.
Скромный эксперт
01.11.2013
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I was looking for a carry-around camera model that would serve as a good alternative to my husbands clunky, cumbersome (to me) DSLR. Specifically, I need something to have on hand for events for my children's school and generally capturing family moments. I had read a number of reviews.. unfortunately, I had not read this one..."The Canon SX170 is not a fast-action camera, and it never will be. It still has all the same problems of the previous models. It has a noticeable shutter lag, a slower focus, a slow image processor, a slow maximum shooting speed of 0.8 fps (less than one picture per second,) a very slow flash recovery time, it doesn't work very well indoors or in low light, and it does not shoot full 1920x1080 HD video, either, only the older 1280x720 quasi-HD video."~ By John Sturgeon (Monterey, California)http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-SX170-Digital-Black/product-reviews/B00EFILR6E/And, in the words of another reviewer, there you have it.It is not good with capturing fast-moving children or shots indoors. It is S_L_O_W, a hand even comes up in between shots asking for you to wait. It does have a proprietary battery, which many are upset about... I'm just impatient to wait for recharging. And, it is constantly _not_ finding the objects that I am interested in shooting (faces of my children), and instead chooses random points in the background - which I found interesting considering I had the subjects faces in the center of my screen. The camera was trying to be too smart, it seemed.I was ready to return within hours of buying it - my husband thought he'd give it a shot... admittedly, he is more of a camera geek than I am. Within minutes or reassembling it from its store-packaging, he came to tell me to bring it back.So, if slow-paced, outdoor picture taking is your thing; I guess this would be great. But, if you were really into that, you'll probably have a high-end DSLR with specialty lenses to suit your subject matter best.
Скромный эксперт
08.01.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I purchased this as a gift for my wife, who wanted something better than her cellphone. She is a birdwatcher but not a fanatic, and wanted something with high resolution and good optical zoom while being small, light and simple to use. This seemed to fit the bill. Unfortunately, when it arrived there was a distinct set of flaws in the images produced, with small but visible blotches on the images. We contacted Canon about this, and were extremely impressed with their response. Within a few minutes we were through their voice response system and speaking to a real service person. She clearly knew the camera. After less than 10 minutes with her trying various fixes, she agreed the camera was defective. Canon emailed me a pre-paid return label with full insurance, saying they'd have the camera repaired and back to us in 15 working days. The actual turnaround was 8 days, and this at the height of the Christmas rush. We received a new rather than refurbished device, along with an extra battery and additional strap for our trouble. The new camera works perfectly, with my wife having some gorgeous shots of cardinals at the bird feeder during a snow storm. She is happy with the device, and we're both very happy with Canon service.
Скромный эксперт
09.12.2013
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Not impressed for a couple of reasons. I am comparing this to the SX260 which I bought a few weeks ago. The SX170 feels like plastic while the SX 260 feels much more sturdy. The flash on the SX170 is manual and while I dont care for the placement of the flash on the SX260( under your left fingers as you hold it) I do like the idea that it is auto when you want it to be. I love the grip area on the SX170 for holding the camera steady but the LCD screen is awful on this camera. SO GRAINY....what a shame!! I dont get it. Why would they use a screen that looks this cloudy grainy and unclear?? In comparison to the SX260 which is crystal clear that fact alone made me send this camera back. The 99.00 deal I got was great but honestly the LCD would bother me the entire time so it wasnt worth it. I own mostly canon and Panasonic Lumix cameras and I can depend on the photos being amazing with both brands so it comes down to cosmetic issues for me and the little things like plastic feel and grainy LCD didnt cut it for me on this camera.Forgot to add that it doesnt come with the USB cable either and while I do have a few of those MANY people would not. I find it odd that they wouldn't include something so basic. It has nothing to do with the performance of the camera, just sayin'....
Скромный эксперт
02.12.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
The most frustrating part was waiting for the lithium battery to charge, but after that delay, I love this camera. I don't do smartphones and I bought the Canon SX170 IS for its video capabilities. It seems smartphones have almost killed the low end dedicated digital video product category, but the slack has been taken up by what seems (to my armature sensibilities) to be excellent video capture in low-end 'still' cameras. I was not expecting any great low-light video capability when I ordered this camera, but I just took a very acceptable video of my cat lit by a single desk lamp, at night. The white balance adjustment seemed very good too. Previously, earlier in the day, I tested the video with available light from two windows on a cloudy December afternoon . . . handheld. It worked great. I don't normally gush about new gadgets, but I am very happy with this camera. It is just EASY to use. I strongly recommend also buying the Canon USB Cable IFC-400PCU and downloading the Canon software for this camera. This is how I transfer video and images from the camera to my desktop. You will also need an additional memory card.
Скромный эксперт
01.06.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Pretty good, for this price, small and compact, good quality of pictures, gas flash light , good for starting photographing
Скромный эксперт
26.02.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
The camera was purchased to replace another that ate batteries. Even with flash, I was able to secure many shots, includind close up details of accident scenes and damaged equipment, witthout any loss of power.
Показаны отзывы 1-8 из 272.
Как менялась цена на Canon PowerShot SX170 IS
Характеристики Canon PowerShot SX170 IS
Информация о характеристиках носит справочный характер.
Перед покупкой уточняйте характеристики и комплектацию товара у продавца
Обзоры и руководства на Canon PowerShot SX170 IS
Альтернативы с более высокой оценкой
Wizemart © 2026.
Рекомендательная система по умному выбору товаров по отзывам и рейтингам
