Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Nikon D3100

да,никон решает!)

Хороший аппарат. Рекомендую.

Хорошая модель!

Отличное качество снимков, покупкой очень довольны. Батарея держит долго, в руке лежит легко, глюков или тормозов не замечено, качество фоток супер, авто-режим хорошо справляется когда некогда настраивать ручной

Не являясь профессиональным фотографом, всё равно снимки отличные получаются и так же радует возможность менять различные режимы съёмки

приятный на ощупь, удобно держать одной рукой, много кнопок, на авто получаются хорошие снимки, дороговат

Неделю заняла доставка до Иркутска, что вполне приемлемо с учётом невысокой цены (у нас в Иркутске такой комплект стоит на 1500 руб дороже). Плюс к этому часть покупки оплатил бонусами СПАСИБО от Сбербанка. В пункте выдаче понимающе и даже с интересом отнеслись к моей комплексной проверке фотоаппарата (проверял на битые/горячие пиксели и бэк/фронт-фокус). Гарантийный талон заполнен, как полагается, в случае каких-либо проблем должны принять в сервисных центрах Nikon. Дома уже детально изучил возможности фотоаппарата. Общее впечатление - супер. Есть, впрочем, небольшие недостатки: тушка небольшая по размерам, мизинец "болтается", когда держишь камеру (но это дело привычки, некритично). Второй момент - при съёмке видео сильно слышно поскрипывание автофокуса объектива. Читал про это на форумах и видел некоторые тесты видео на ютубе - у меня всё точно так же. Говорят, что устраняется при использовании внешнего микрофона. Мощность вспышки средняя, наверное стоит впоследствии купить дополнительную, но пока смысла в этом не вижу, ибо только-только начал заниматься фотографией.Кстати, не совсем было понятно, когда заказывал - есть ли бленда к объективу. Бленда есть. Пластиковая, но довольно неплохая.Вобщем, камерой очень доволен. Рекомендую проверять не только комплектность, но и базовые функции фотоаппарата непосредственно в пункте выдачи заказов - меньше проблем будет впоследствии.

Пересмотрел огромное количество отзывов о D3200, также нашёл массу сравнительных обзоров с ближайшими конкурентами - Nikon D5100, Canon 600D, Canon 650D. В итоге, посоветовавшись с другом-фотографом, остановился на D3200 с этим объективом. Пока жду доставку. Отпишусь о качестве фото после 16-17 февраля.

Купил на ОЗОНе месяц назад. Это моя первая зеркалка. Радости нет придела. После цыфромыльницы, аппарат супер. Советую всем. Недостатков пока не нашел. Отдельное спасибо ОЗОНу за сервис, все супер!!!

Отличное качество снимков, покупкой очень довольны. Батарея держит долго, в руке лежит легко, глюков или тормозов не замечено, качество фоток супер, авто-режим хорошо справляется когда некогда настраивать ручной

Не являясь профессиональным фотографом, всё равно снимки отличные получаются и так же радует возможность менять различные режимы съёмки

приятный на ощупь, удобно держать одной рукой, много кнопок, на авто получаются хорошие снимки, дороговат

Этот фотоаппарат - моя первая зеркалка. Поэтому каких либо профессиональных комментариев дать не смогу... Качество снимков по сравнению с "мыльницей" Canon - просто шикарные! Это не "минус", но надо иметь ввиду, что оригиналы снимков занимают очень много места на компьютере. Для снимков придется выделять отдельный съёмный диск или записывать на диски для хранения. Иначе вся память будет очень быстро забита снимками.Этот аппарат надо изучать. Просто сделать снимки на автомате - легко и просто. Но там очень большие возможности, которые стразу не постигнуть.

I only shot about 100 snaps of this, and while still early, this is the best flash I've used.
I hope it will hold well with years of use. It seems to be of high-ish quality plastic, and literally SMELLS good (its not funny, the smell of different types of plastic gives away quite a lot for their quality, due to different chemical additives, softerners, plastificators, etc)

Overall, the quality of light is perfect (about 5600-5700K) and recharges like a champ. It is much more powerful and fast charging than an SB600 and even SB910 which I've used extensively, no matter what batteries you use in the original Nikon flashes. Being much more powerful was expected (I do not know why Nikon cheapens SO MUCH on their flashes, but every single chinese flash is better, for 1/10th of the price of Nikon's). What is unexpected for me is that the white balance is so good (well its still brand-spanking-new).
The light distribution, however, is not that perfect. There is room for improvement, especially on the wide end, under 30mm. Being high power helps with distant headshots and provides all that's needed for a perfect portrait, but when I try shooting large groups of people and have to resort to 18mm, with the provided wide-filter, the light on the bottom is a tad scarce, and the bottom left and right corners are nearly dark. Of course direct flash is rarely used, and as such this is still a 5/5 star flash for me (and better than SB910 which says a lot!)

The auto-focus assist is good, not up to Nikon's flashes level (they use more sophisticated patterns), but is good enough for center dot autofocus on my D3300 in almost impossible shots. So this works as needed. If you use a D810, then maybe you will need to step-up your autofocus game, I cannot comment on those fancy complicated autofocus systems. For the simplest D3000/D3100/D3200/D3300 this flash gives you almost perfect reference for center autofocus (maybe for different modes as well, I use center-dot only).

The best feature for me is the slave optical triggering, which works with my D3300's stock flash. You hold the Neewer flash in your hand and pop the small stock flash, and both fire in your shot. Works well and provides even more illumination, and helps you get almost studio light on the go. Win-win. (I do not use wireless flash, but this flash supports it and its quite complicated and has a lot of choices)

The buttons are not lit (enchancement request for a future version please). They CLICK very well. You know you've clicked it trough good feedback. However, the round button does not register so well and minor adjustments of output are harder, since you often dial more or dial less than what you wanted, due to the poor quality rotating knob. This is maybe the only thing about the whole package which feels low quality

The LCD display is easy to read, seems high quality and has a good amount of backlight, if deserved (off by default)
The test button has a nice soft glow (maybe this is the only part which uses battery when in standby, besides internal electronics).
The internal electronics goes very quickly in standby (while flash IS READY to fire), which I guess is to save battery and I welcome it. What I mean by this is - leave it for 5sec, and then zoom your lens - the flash idles. If you half-press your camera shutter - then the flash zooms. If you re-zoom again, the flash continues to zoom in and out in realtime with you. I quickly got accustomed by this and I actually like it - it is silent if you leave it for 5sec, yet its ready to zoom and fire when you need it. Saving battery is even better (because I re-zoom a lot and do not want my flash constantly moving in and out, wasting battery, plus wearing out, after all this is chinese made quality inside)

The head rotates with tight fit, effort required, I like it, it click every 10 or so degrees (has degrees embossed in the plastic! these tiny details make me smile and be happy with the purchase)
The up/down function is not so tight and maybe overtime will loose even further. This is maybe the only thing I see that might degrade over time. We will see how its gonna hold up.

Initially I pushed the white paper/ish thingie (sorry forgot the word for it) past the wide deflector, while taken out, and it remained hidden in the flash head. I used a thin object to take it out (the paper thingie has a small square hole maybe for this emergency).
I thought this is a major design flaw. Then I noticed that while the wide deflector is pushed in, the flash does not zoom! I got scared it is broken and I would have to ship it back. Hustling with the buttons and the whole assembly I found in about 10min that the wide plastic deflector has to be pushed down, and IT CLICKS to show its hidden away. Then the zoom started working. It is my fault for not thinking of that, but its a good idea to be in the guide (that you need t

The specification is in the product listing for everyone see, so I won't review that, other than to say that this camera is a good specification for the price. I'll aim this review towards detailing my experience with using this camera. People looking at this model are likely comparing it to the similarly priced Canon model. Both brands are quite comparable, so at this level of the market it is really a matter of personal preference as to which brand you choose - and the current deals and discounts on offer. I choose the Nikon D3100 camera with the kit 18-55mm lens over the Canon model because I got a large discount off the second lens I wanted - the 55-200mm. (I see now that Amazon sells the camera with this lens in addition to the 18-55mm as an option, but this wasn't an option back when I bought then.) I thought with these two lenses I would have an adequate kit to get started in DSLR photography, although either a 35mm or 50mm prime FX lens is next on my wishlist. (FX lenses work fine on a DX body such as the D3100, although with a 1.5x effective focal length boost so I can somewhat future proof my lens purchases in the event I eventually upgrade to a better camera body.)I bought my camera and lenses back in April 2013 and decided to use it for several months before I reviewed them. I was heading on a trip a month later that I wanted this camera to accompany me on, and also wanted time to get to grips with the step up from many years of just using point and shoots before I offered a public opinion. I had wanted a DSLR for years, but couldn't justify the cost to myself, (I have kids and feel guilty spending money on myself), and so I had already read several books that explained the science of taking photos in a fully manual mode with a DSLR but I had never so much as picked up a DSLR before buying one. From using both film camera and digital point and shoots I was already fairly experienced and proficient in the composition aspect of taking a photo as well as in using image processing software such as Lightroom, Photoshop (Elements) and Paint Shop Pro to improve my photos. Of course, with a point and shoot or a scanned film photo I was forced to edit lossy JPG files - and now with a DSLR I can process native RAW files, (.NEF format on the Nikon), and the results from this change alone are phenomenal! I was amazed by just how much detail can be found in a RAW file using Adobe Lightroom 5 from what looks like a flat white or black area in an over/under exposed area. I'll never shoot in JPEG again if I have an option to shoot in a native RAW format.When I had received the camera I read the manual from cover to cover while the battery fully charged. I then jumped in my car and headed off on a drive to somewhere fairly scenic but local(ish) to test out my new purchase. I was determined that I would rarely use the fully AUTO mode unless I wanted to take an unplanned rush shot of something I'd miss photographing otherwise.My several hours that day out taking photos was a very educational (and fun) time for me, and certainly cemented my enthusiasm to learn more about photography that I had hoped I would have when taking the jump up to a DSLR. I toyed around taking photos of things with differing apertures in Aperture Priority mode until I was comfortable controlling the depth of field, (as best I could with the kit lens.) took photos of things both close, and the mountains far away, at varying focal lengths, confirming for myself various aspects of photography I had read so much about but hadn't been able to practice and experiment with before fully, (e.g. bringing the background scenery closer while keeping a foreground subject a constant size.) Back home that evening I went out in the back yard and mounted my new camera on an old tripod I have with the 55-200mm lens and took photos of the moon and my house in the dark until I better understood shutter speed settings and how different ISO settings affect the photos I take. Again, this was all stuff I'd read about, but never really fully had practical experience with regard to my own photographs before. My kids were also willing models so I could experiment with portraiture.photos using different settings until I achieved the effects I wanted or could achieve with just the kit lens and it's lack of a large aperture (small f-stop).Over the next few weeks before the family trip I planned to take this DSLR on with me, I picked the camera up and experimented daily. I took better photos every day and started to instinctively know what settings to use in full manual mode - my first guesses became increasingly correct, or were otherwise a pretty good starting point to fine tune when I had set the camera incorrectly for the conditions or photo I wanted.This is a tremendous camera to learn with and takes fabulous photos. My family went on the trip overseas. I took close to 3000 photos in the weeks we were traveling. Granted, I used the camera in a continuous shooting m

This is the first time I have ever bought a used camera "sight-unseen", it arrived on time and was as advertised, and I am not disappointed with it. Despite my reservations about battery life, this camera is good for about 5 hours of continuous random shooting with the OEM battery, and having come with a 32GB card already in it, I can get about 300 pictures before I have to recharge the battery (1.03A/hr) and still have plenty of room left over before I use up the memory. I have since bought two additional batteries and the charge time from dead to full charge is short enough where I can use another battery and the old one is recharged before the new one goes flat. As these are Lithium Ion batteries, I can also recharge a partially drained battery after a shoot and not have to worry about battery memory problems.Having the ability to work fully manual or automatic is nice as well, although frequent use of autofocus and shooting in raw .jpeg files significantly reduces the battery life and the number of shots per charge - but raw jpegs can give exceptional results. This is a trade-off that did not pertain to film cameras. Interchangeable lenses is also a big plus as I do a lot of macro-photography and, contrary to normal lenses - which have a curved depth of field - macro lenses have a depth of field that is more like two flat planes making it a lot easier to deal with depth of field issues when photographing small objects.In the past, I have owned a Hasselblad 500, Rolleiflex, Pentax Spotmatic, Canon F-1, AE-1, Olympus OM-1, OM-2 - all with multiple lenses - and a D-500 digital - and all were excellent performers. With the exception of the Olympus D-500 all were film type cameras and after every photo shoot, I would have to spend hours in the darkroom developing slides, mounting them and then have to edit them over a lightbox with a magnifier and cotton gloves and canned air. With this camera, which is fully compatible with Linux Ubuntu and GIMP Image Editor, all I had to do was buy a USB cable (Which I feel should be supplied - sheesh!), or remove the memory card and insert it into my laptop, download and edit, delete and save my images as desired. I can also delete images, from the computer, using the file management utilities inherent in Linux.Yes I would recommend this camera and vendor to others. I am getting high enough quality images for both printing and internet and other digital formats and rarely go over 8"X10" on prints, which have the same quality as prints from 35mm inter-negatives from Kodachrome 25 or prints from normal 35mm negatives. While the D3200 has about 4 more MB of pixels, the format of this is large enough where I generally reduce the image size to the standard formats and I can go as high as 500pixels per inch in jpeg formats so the image quality is not a factor. My shooting method has always been to shoot a larger background than I need to allow me more freedom in cropping the final photo as I can increase the pixels per inch in the process and not lose any image quality. All-in-all a 5-star performer. To quote Bogie..."This may be the start of a beautiful friendship."...Two cons I should mention. The camera came to me with a lot of photos in the memory. I would think that the prior owner or the seller should have formatted the card prior to selling the camera. It only takes seconds to reformat the card. Just a heads up for anyone contemplating selling their camera and the vendor I bought this from. I really do not need, or want, someone elses work on my camera. I am also a bit miffed that this requires a plug-in remote shutter release that plugs into a port instead of the old style shutter cables. Meh... Progress marches on. Maybe the Smithsonian would be interested in my old shutter cables. But this is more of a matter of personal preference anyway - and is only a handicap when shooting wildlife where I set upon a tripod and work from a blind. The manual shutter releases do not require a battery and the cordless do - and are subject to RFI.

I bought this because I had heard good things about the recycle time with it having a Li-On battery. The fact it uses the same trigger as my AD-360 was also a bonus.

The flash itself is very well made and it feels like it would stand up to professional use. The display is easy to understand. The first annoyance though is the short sleep time. The lack of instructions meant I had to ask on the Internet to find out how to change this setting.

Using my trusty light meter the V860 is just as powerful as my Nikon SB-910. It does recharge quicker. I didn't measure it using a stopwatch but I'd say the SB-910 is 3-4 seconds and the V860 is 2-3 seconds approximately.

Confusingly the trigger and receiver say "Power" when it really should say group. Turning the dial changes the group, not the power. I've no idea why Godox have done this. My older triggers for my AD-360 say "Group" on them.

However I found that TTL mode consistently underexposed by about 1 stop. If you google around you will see many people complaining about this. Of course you can just dial +1 into the camera but that's a bit annoying and should be easily fixed.

During my first wedding however I found that the flash's recycle speed simply didn't give me the ability to take more photos in quick succession. In fact the SB-910 seemed to perform better and more consistently. This I felt was the straw that broke the camels back. What's the point in having a fast recycle if it cannot keep up when a AA powered SB-910 can.

The Li-On battery becomes a useless luxury really. AA's are ubiquitous so if you run out, you can buy them from almost any store. Unlike the Ving battery. I tend not to use more than one set of AA's at a wedding so I don't need the extra capacity of the Li-On battery.

so ultimately I sent the flash back for a refund and have decided instead to get a cheaper flash that uses AA's. Shame really. It had potential.

I want to love this flash but somehow can't. There are a few things which really let it down:

1. Over heating. If you fire too many full power pops with this flash it kicks into over heat mode. What that means is it slows you down and will only fire once every 10ish seconds. The main problem with this is that if it's in overheat mode and so you reduce down the power it still will only fire 1 flash every 10 seconds. Even if that flash is only at 1/128 power. There's also no way of disabling it in the menu system. Sometimes to me the shot is more important then the flash and I'm willing to take my chances, there is no way to turn off the over heat protection in this situation. One slight hack I did notice though is that it's done on number of flashes and not actual heat. Thus if you turn it off and on again it resets the over heat protection.

2. Gelling. There's no easy way to gel this flash and no gel cover. I love the little plastic ones on my SB900's as they make gelling a piece of piss. This one is back to the old velcro tricks

3. It's not fully compatible with PW's. It kinda works with the Flex TT5's but you need to make sure you turn the trigger on before the flash. Also if you leave it too long without flashing then it will somehow stop working, almost like it goes to sleep but the display is still on. Turn the flash off and on again and it comes back to life but obviously that's a problem if it's in a remote location!

The flashlight came with a frame in the light section detached on the day the product arrived, which shook around when the camera moved. It annoyed me very quickly but it's pretty easy to take off the front two built in flash diffusers with a blunt knife if you're careful. Once I clicked the frame into place and the two diffusers were pushed back on and the product worked like it always should have. The flashlight itself is great, but just be warned that it may arrive with poorly attached components... at least it did for me.

However, as I said, the product itself is great and the flash is ace for the price

P.S. Yes I know I could have sent it back and got a new one, but I'm a very impatient human being