Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Canon PowerShot G10
284 отзывов пользователей o Canon PowerShot G10
Пользовались
Canon PowerShot G10?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Image quality is what matters and I'm disappointed with this camera. The problems I have with it are:
1. Pixel noise. As others have mentioned, noise becomes apparent at ISO's 400 and above. However, when you actually analyse the picture taken at lower ISO's, noise is still evident. If you are going to use a camera outdoors during the day or if you are using this for regular prints or photos for the web, then this is not a problem. If you are using this camera for indoors, poorly lit situations, and want high quality images that you can blow up to maximum size then it does become a problem. Using ISO 800 and above is useless in this camera.
2. Focus. The camera reviews here state that the images produced by this camera are super sharp. I didn't find this was the case. When I viewed images at actual size (100%) in Photoshop, I noticed the image to be soft. The sharpness that I would expect is not there. I tested using a tripod, light box and ISO 80 setting, but still notice that the image is soft. I compared images at 100% with images taken with my S400 camera and the S400 was sharper. Once again, for regular prints or photos for the web, you won't notice a sharpness problem. Its when you blow images up to larger size that you may find an issue.
3. Bright lights are not handled very well by the camera. You will notice that areas of brightness (lights) are really blown out in the image.
4. There is already a recall on this camera to resolve fine lines in images issue and a firmware update to fix a hue issue (check Canon website for details).
5. What you see through the range finder and what you see on the LCD screen are two very different things. The rangefinder view is very cropped.
I can only give it a two stars. It is overpriced and doesn't live up to the image quality that I would expect from Canon.

OK, the G10 isn't ever going to be as good as a decent DSLR with a good lens but for a compact it's great. The zoom range is roughly the same as a 35mm zoom of 28-135mm, which is pretty much the range I used to cover with prime lenses when I used 35mm film SLRs.In other words, it's fine for most non-specialised photography. The quality of images produced is excellent, so you can expect to be able to make your own A3 prints with no problem and it looks like the images will stand up to quite large size canvas/art printing as well (I haven't tried this yet but the images viewed on screen at 100% look sharp without any additional processing).
This camera has plenty of user control potential and all the main settings can be done with "hard" controls on the camera body, so you only need to go into the screen based menu for the less frequently changed stuff (the screen is fantastic by the way). I didin't think I'd use the two custom mode settings at first but after using the camera for a while I found that they are actually useful and I use one for my basic AV priority mode with all the other settings I prefer and the second is used for all of these same settings but using RAW + JPEG. Of course, if you want, you can shut down all manual control and use the camera on auto without having to think about anything but pressing the shutter release.
Personally, I like the feel of this camera - probably because it has a similar feel to the more advanced film based cameras of 10 years ago. That said, I also like the very compact digital cameras that that are light/small enough to always carry and use just as a visual notebook or at parties and so on. The G10 seems to be designed for quite serious image making but without the weight and size of a modern DSLR. It does have a small sensor, of course, so it has the limitations that go with this but up to ISO 200 the noise is OK (not too many people would have used film faster than ISO 200 for general photography anyway, and ISO 400 and above film was pretty grainy, as I recall).
Yes, there are cheaper cameras that might compare with the G10 in terms of lens spec or pixel count etc but this camera has the performance and the feel of a quality product - it's very pleasing to use.

What makes this camera a 1-star? A well known problem with the G-series - they suck in dust onto the sensor. I tried taking it apart myself but I couldn't get to the sensor (the 3 screws holding it are glued down). The alternative? Probably a 100-pound-plus repair bill and NO guarantee it will work afterwards (my G7 was destroyed when I had it repaired by a canon repair shop - often the G series only perform half the functions after a "repair").
KEEP AWAY FROM THE G-SERIES UNLESS YOU ARE HAPPY WITH A LIFETIME OF ABOUT 1 YEAR. I'VE HAD 2 G-SERIES CAMERAS NOW AND THEY BOTH FAILED AFTER A YEAR.


It's basically a digital rangefinder style of camera for those who want more than a point and shoot snapper and want manual control options. It may not be cheap, but it's not silly money either. OK, the f stops are limited and the optical viewfinder isn't great, but you don't have to use it. However, those who have used optical viewfinders will appreciate the difference from SLR viewfinders. It's a different way of making photos, and although it may not appeal to everyone it's a technique that has kept many famous photographers using Leicas when far better technology has been available for years.
In normal lighting conditions the camera is capable of results are little short of amazing. The lens quality makes good use of the 14.7 megapixel images, and you can produce the sort of photographs that would have required a medium format camera back when film was the only viable option. My only regret is that this camera was not available ten years ago, there are so many times when it would have been very useful over the years.
In short, the camera isn't perfect, but there is not much on the market in this style of camera to compare it against. It's capable of excellent results under the right conditions and it's well made. Those who choose it, do so for what it is, not for what it isn't.


The most direct competition in a compact comes from the Panasonic LX3. While not quite matching the LX3's low light performance the G10's superior zoom (5x as opposed to 2.5) makes it far more versatile, and at low ISO it has superior, not to say stunning, resolution.
And while the G10's low light performance may not be comparable to an SLR, it's still better than the vast majority of compacts. In many situations it's possible to reduce noise by keeping the ISO down to 400 or less. In low light I use aperture priority mode to keep the aperture at maximum and the shutter speed as high as possible. You can set the ISO to 200 on the dedicated ISO dial, and shoot at slow speeds thanks to the very effective optical image stabilisation. In continuous mode this allows shooting down to 1/15 sec; at 1/8 and below single-shot mode is more effective, enabling hand-held shots at 1/4 sec. with little or no camera shake.
With its excellent 3" high-resolution screen, RAW shooting, a host of manual options, customisable menus and incredible macro capability, the G10 has a lot to offer; you get a feature-packed camera that fits in your pocket without making too big a hole in it.

I have owned the camera for about a month and have used it and have aslo taken tuition from the person who recomended the camera.
I am very pleased with the product and commend it to you.

I have an Ixus i80 and and EOS350D also so this forms a great intermediate camera. Probably better than the EOS in fact.

Rapid delivery thanks to Amazon ensured it arrived in time. I have been very pleased with my purchase.

Received from Amazon within a couple of days of ordering, this camera exceeds my expectations. As a user of Canon digital SLR cameras, I am very impressed with the results and A3 size prints can be made from the JPEG files virtually straight from the camera. Even RAW files need minimal editing although there is plenty of scope there should it be desired. Forget about the digital zoom as I have successfully made crops from small areas of the optical zoom images with no great deterioration in quality. Negative comments have been made about noise levels, however I have used this to my advantage producing flower closeups at 1600 ISO which have ended up with a beautiful watercolor effect - the noise also works well in in monochrome (memories of grainy black and white film) so I think that too much bad comment has been written about noise problems. In any case, it always is the case that low ISO setting will produce the finest results, so think positively, not negatively and buy and enjoy this camera. For the next version of this camera, I would like to see the digital zoom eliminated (as I think it is surplus to the needs of most users of cameras of this quality) and HD video incorporated.


If you ever used one of the early Lieca M series cameras you will recognise the format. But, many digital derivations of that format lack charm and feel; they just get in the way of a good image and slow you down with idiotic menus. The G10 feels like engineering, not electronics; I can forget the camera and "See" again.
This will never be a studio workhorse like my Nikon D-SLRs, but even there it feels good and makes me smile. A small sensor like this can't deliver the clarity of a big one and it suffers if you crank up the ISO, but the rendition of tone is kind and the controls are so easy to live with I can forgive the rest. You will soon be choosing to use it over more serious cameras, even when weight is not the main reason for doing so. You just hit the On/Off button and start using it.
Positive: So far - most of it really.
Negative: The zoom function lack the precision of a bigger camera and the tripod bush is NOT under the lens axis WHY??
Enjoy
Paul

I would therefore NOT recommend this camera.I hope the G11 doesn't suffer from the same defect.


I am very pleased with the pictures I have taken so far using the aperture and manual settings. I have taken some really good close up pictures of flowers. I have also found that the people Mode gives far superior pics to my old camera.Having said that I chose the Canon as I wanted more manual control rather than lots of fancy modes.If you want a camera that does all the work for you another model may be more appropriate.
The Canon G10 is a lot heavier than my old Nikon. To my uneducated eye it looks like an old fashioned 35mm camera. However I have decided it way outperforms my old Nikon compact. I think it's weight and chunkiness helps keep the camera steady improving the quality of your pictures. It does feel very easy to hold.
I am disappointed that the camera doesn't come with a paper manual. When you are learning photography you need something you can take out with you. I also find the manual is a bit confusing. I think I will learn more by playing around with it.
Overall though I am very pleased with my purchase and am looking forward to taking some great pictures.



I was in Jordan recently with colleagues from National Geographic, and they were saying what a nice camera it is and that I bought right. I guess you don't get a better recommendation than that.



The camera came as quickly as ever (thanks Amazon). The first photo opportunity was a trip to a bluebell wood and the pictures I took from first use and in subdued lighting were outstanding quality. The macro feature allowed superb shots of the individual stems.
The two things I would point out is that it definitely benefits from a fast, high quality memory card, as this reduces the transfer time after the photograph is taken, and having a card of no more than 2Gb will allow it to be used in computer card readers (I bought a 4Gb and a 2Gb memory card; only the 2Gb card is recognised by my card reader and WinXP). You can of course connect the camera to the computer but it is quicker to upload using the card alone.
Well recommended.

I have had the camera for a month or so now and am extremely pleased with it.
I bought it because I did not want the bulk and hassle of a DSLR but wanted the flexibility of full manual control and high quality images. I was keen to have a view finder for those long exposure shots when you don't have a tripod to hand and have to brace nice and firmly. The view finder is compromised (77% field of view) but is better than nothing. I looked ay the Panasonic LX3 (lens range too limited) and the Nikon P6000 (Gimmicky) and decided that the Canon was the one for me.
I have used it in a variety of conditions from sunny landscapes to poorly lit restaurants and have managed consistently good images.
The build quality is excellent and battery life has been good even when using the camera hard with lots of flash work in a short space of time.
Using a decent 8Gb SDHC card I have found the write speeds good even when shooting RAW.
My only issue has been the size of the camera which is fine for a winter coat pocket but nothing smaller. Getting a case to fit has also been a bit of an issue. The one I have at the moment is too bulky but does protect the camera.
Overall a superb camera and one I would recommend to anyone who takes their photography seriously.

