Отзывы о Наушники Audio-Technica ATH-M20X
1457 отзывов пользователей o Audio-Technica ATH-M20X
Пользовались
Audio-Technica ATH-M20X?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
After having tried their flagship M50X, I was satisfied enough to try a pair of ATH earbuds. While not quite the same, that quality signature carries out in these headphones. From the splash from the highs to the punch of the bass and that clarity in between, nothing seems to suffer. About the only negative thing I can say is that the wire does produce some rustling, but it's not hard to ignore it. The amount of sound they block out is worth mention too (obviously it's not 100%, but definitely more than your average pair). Comfort is also a plus.
I'm entirely satisfied. While I'm not familiar with the other models, I can say that these are worth what you pay for (possibly more). I'd recommend these to anyone in the market for quality ATH earbuds.
First off, I'd like to thank the folks at Audio-Technica for providing a review sample of the CKS99.
Up for review is the mid-range entry into the Solid Bass line of in ear monitors from Audio-Technica, the CKS99. So, without further ado, let's get right to it, shall we?
Accessories: The CKS99 comes with four pairs of silicone eartips, a set of manuals and a leather carrying case.
Design and Build Quality: The housings of the CKS99 are plastic and similar to the CKS77 but feature a few nicer accents to differentiate it from the lower end model. Overall, the earphones seem nicely built with sturdy cables and black plastic housings with a soft touch feel to them around the edges where the housings come into contact with your outer ear.
Comfort: Like the CKS77, the fit of the CKS99 could be a point of contention for some but I was once again very pleased with the fit of the CKS99 as it was quite comfortable for me over long periods. The driver sat in my outer ear nicely without exerting any unpleasant pressure.
Isolation: These isolate very well for a vented dynamic IEM.
Microphonics: A tad unpleasant at times but nothing excessive.
Sound Quality
Burn in: The CKS99 was given 50+ hours of burn in time prior to review and no significant changes were detected.
Like the CKS77, the CKS99 features prominent bass, a clear but recessed midrange and prominent treble. To go into further detail on the sound signature and the ways in which it improves over its sibling, let's start at the bottom.
The bass is big and full with slightly more emphasis on the midbass than sub bass and merely okay extension. If there's a lot of midbass emphasis on a track, the midbass hump will become incredibly obvious and distracting. Like the CKS77, the bass has a tendency to step up on the lower midrange which can end up sounding rather "thick" as a result.
The midrange retains some of the "hollow" character from the CKS77 but is surprisingly forward in presentation. Instruments sometimes sound a bit recessed but vocals are front and center. The midrange as a whole is actually rather smooth and detailed. Claritiy is good and the presentation is reasonably linear. In terms of pure detail, the CKS99 is ahead of its sibling but not quite on the level of the RE-400.
Treble is a bit less even and the lower treble is occasionally prone to sibilance but on the whole, the airiness of the treble combined with its good presence and great extension make it rather pleasant on the whole.
Presentation wise, the CKS99 eschews a bit of the claustrophobic spaciousness that I noticed on the CKS77 and sounds just as open but even more intimate, with vocals being very forward in the presentation. This sounds rather odd, considering the slightly recessed nature of the midrange but there it is. Along with the big bass, vocals do a great job of standing out and being heard.
Conclusion
Now this is where things get interesting. The CKS99 retails for $150 while the CKS77 retails for $120. However, I've found the CKS99 for $93 and the CKS77 for $99. If you're in the market for either one, the CKS99 is easily the better pick.
Like the CKS77, however, the CKS99 also comes with some qualifiers. If you're looking for big bass and have the large-ish outer ear canals to fit them, the CKS99 is a pretty good choice for the price, even the higher than $99 retail price. If you're looking for a more rounded experience, that's what the RE-400 is for. The strength of the low end and the strong midbass emphasis may be a turn off for some audiophiles but the sound signature is more or less in line with Audio-Technica's "house sound" and is warm and pleasant across a number of genres and I found them surprisingly enjoyable for Jazz. On the whole, if you're looking for an earphone with big bass between $100 and $150, the CKS99 is a very solid choice.
The build quality on these is decent. They do feel cheap for the most part but they never broke on me. The cables do feel fragile.
The sound is actually great when using an equalizer. With the equalizer, you can get quite a lot of bass from these headphones. The bass is great on these, it doesn't overpower the rest of the music but it was enough for me, as a minor bass head. The mids and highs sound good as well.
I am returning this product mainly due to their comfort. I use them while doing homework and they do start making my ears feel pain after wearing them for an hour. They also don't isolate sound very well. You can hear everything around you unless you turn the volume up almost to max.
I would recommend these headphones if you love bass and won't be listening to these for hours at a time. They have great sound and if they were more comfortable and had better build quality I really could see myself using them for a long time.
I'll start with what makes it a 4 instead of a 5. Hurts the ears after an hour or two, really made for smaller Japanese heads, my friend who always complains about in ears being too big for his little ears said they fit over his ears perfectly (he's 5'2") Some headphones make everything that I play through them sound good. However, spotify streaming songs really come through poorly, even at 320 high quality streaming. The Sennheiser HD600 makes spotify sound brilliant, with the skull candy's everything sounds fun with the bass.
Where these headphones shine is really high quality mids and highs for a bass headphone, something that the skull candy crushers cant even begin to compete with. The bass isn't crazy, but it's good for bassheads like me who listen to EDM and are disappointed in the neutral approach, non sub bass shaking way that sennheiser treats it.
All the music that I have downloaded sounds great.
A great headphone, love the bass response, and the mids and highs are extrememly crisp for a bass headphone. A good purchase overall.
. The leather/faux leather whatever ear pads have gotten better since I've started wearing them, but the sort of tight fit is a little rough
I literally spent about three hours roaming the earphone section of Yodobashi Camera in Akihabara Tokyo.
If you have been there, then you would know that this is an entire building of about 6 floors dedicated to all electronics, and virtually an entire floor dedicated to solely audio equipment and earphone type products. They hold basically every brand and every model that exists (at least to my knowledge).
I was there for hours plugging in my iphone to every single model of earbud type earphones playing the same song over and over and finally decided on this. The CKS1000 was much more expensive but the bass in my opinion was an overkill. Other brands like Bose, Shure, Beats, etc. were good but this was the one with the balance, comfort, and quality. Luckily in Japan they sold these cheaper than here in the USA and got them for about 7000yen (which translates I think to roughly somewhere between $65-75 USD).
I would give them a try. I had a pair of very expensive Shure ear phones (which i don't recall the model name but remember paying $150 for them) before but I prefer these much more. Sound quality in my opinion is more about the balance between quality and comfort and accessibility in my personal opinion. The Shures' were nice but too much "boost" in the lower bass spectrums, and the hardware was uncomfortable. The middle ring on this pair of CKS99i is meant to fit into your ear as a way to secure inside your ear anatomically and ends up being very comfortable.
The only thing that I worry about is the fact that like all earphones (or most) the rubber of the chord will eventually rip and expose the wiring which will result in failure of performance. This has not happened yet, but from the looks of it, it doesn't seem to be built physically too much different integrally and materially than many other earphones I've had with this problem. So fingers crossed that the rubber material and design will hold up to the actual electronic hardware.
Anyway, the bottom line is, I recommend this product. At least as a person who has gone through many earphones in my life I personally enjoy these and have been and will continue to use them daily.
However, the audio quality of these headphones entirely makes up for any slippage during workouts. The audio quality of these headphones is a problem - a problem for this reason: once you listen to these headphones, every other set of in ear headphones sounds horrendous. It makes gaming, listening to EDM and other "high-impact" audio activities very engaging. The audio quality of these headphones literally BLOWS away any competition, especially given the price. I've tried many sets of in-ear headphones (Klipsch, Bose, Beats) and these are by far the best set ever. Listening to audio through this headset is immersive, and you can hear every detail of the songs.
Now I'll be honest. I'm not an audiophile, I have no interest in these headphones for their minute technical advantages. I wanted a pair of headphones that makes the music come alive in my ears, and these headphones accomplish that. I've bought over three pairs of the CKS55's and I have absolutely no intention of migrating away from this form of headset anytime soon.
TLDR: Amazing audio quality, immersive sound, but don't expect to do karate with these headphones and still have them in your ears after you are done.
Overall for pure sound i would pick the MTX-50s, unless I'm listening to more bassy music (like faithless for example).
But these headphones feel much smaller and look much better for walking around town than the MTX50s.
sound quality is good
If you are a Bass Heavy listener, you really can't go wrong with this pair. It can really do it all, but it comes down to what you listen to mostly.
firstly, i was shocked when i opened the WS77 package and found out that there were no accessories in it. For a headphone marketed as portable with no pouch, carrying case, 1/4 inch adaptor in the box, i find it weird considering the $121 prize tag on it. The design is not the most beautiful i have seen and not at all ugly..., but it sit somewhere in the middle which is very adequate. The headset is lighter than i though and covers the whole of my ear, i wore them for about six hours to tell you how comfortable they are, though a little sweat as expected. This headphone is made of a cheap plastic but where i find very appealing is the aluminum ear cups faceplate and the shiny chrome Audio-Technica symbol on it. Some will find the cable too short and others will not. It will also interest you to know that the Y shaped cable is not detachable. Overall the design is just average but personally i feel cheated spending $121 for this quality of design. So let's just sweep this section aside and dive into where your hard earned cash! was really spent.
SOUND QUALITY: Audio-Technica marketed this ATH-WS77 as a solid bass head phone and that will definitely make the non bass fans shy away from this baby! but that is not the case here. Burn in is necessary, and from the first minutes i just told myself...., "THIS IS IT". How Audio-Technica perfectly harmonized the bass, mid and high in this can, really deserves a mighty applause! The bass response is unmatched by similarly priced headphones from Beats by Dre Solo HD's, the Sony Extra Bass line and the highly rated V-MODA Crossfade LP's.The bass extends extremely low without roll off, it's extremely punchy and hits hard if it wants to..., what a flexibility! The midrange is relatively equivalent to the bass in terms of prescence and is very warm, but over all the ATH-WS77's presents the mid range tones as well as the vocals, sparkles and sibilance at the upper end very very well and the separation too, is fantastic! and for sound stage, this is one of the best closed cans i have seen.
A typically bass headphones, tend to be all about the bass and less about the rest of the frequencies, and even with that many bass headphones possess bass that is muddy, bloated or both but this ATH-WS77 strikes you with this unique calmness and anxiety that makes your veins lights up! is really hard to put in word but he fact that Audio Technica was able to achieve such amazing bass response yet maintain such an outstanding clarity is unbelievable! Yes i highly recommend this headphone for those that are still searching to find the best headphones that is worth the prize.







