Отзывы о Наушники Audio-Technica ATH-M20X
1435 отзывов пользователей o Audio-Technica ATH-M20X
Пользовались
Audio-Technica ATH-M20X?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
они не тяжелые басы, как jbls но предлагают более сбалансированный звук с хорошими басами. Тяжелый бас широко используется, чтобы прикрыть низкое качество звука из наушников.<бр /><бр />некоторые говорят, что провода хлипкие, но я уснула с наушниками по несколько раз и они еще целы.<БР />
вы будете наслаждаться наушники даже больше, если аудио или видео файл более высокого качества.пядь>

в WoW они звучат потрясающе, удовольствие для ушей????????<БР />
я не стану отрицать, что качество сборки не зависит от знака, но давайте не будем судить его прочность на основе материалов качества
Для наглядности отлично, я использовал СХ 180 ,звук волшебный ES18S и Sony EX155AP но аудио техника на высшем уровне, что
и Баса вполне достаточно не высокая и не низкая, так что хвастаться нечем.<бр /><бр />качество сборки могло быть лучше, но пока рано судить, давайте как долго она длится.<бр /><бр />если ясность-это ваш приоритет, находка для тех, кто любит мелодию песни.<бр /><бр />слышал Hawayein, Шенна mereye и многие другие песни и в каждой песне был звук так успокаивает уши.<бр /><бр />дерзайте...

но в итоге я нашел как звук из этих наушников после того, как я использовал его на некоторое время. Если вы планируете использовать его во время езды на велосипеде, то звук может быть потерян на ветру и шум мотоцикла.

- качество сборки была единственная проблема с наушниками и только по этой причине я вернулся наушники
- и бас не так велик, но в целом очень успокаивающий и чарующий шум<бр /><бр />в целом хорошие наушники можно купить по этой цене пойдет на это ????пядь>

очень легкий вес, практически никакого веса.
и наблюдать странные угла, который доказывает, как туннель для звука и имеет удивительные бутоны твердо АМД eaisly.
в 90 градусов угловой 3.5 мм контактный доказывает хорошая характеристика, которые носят телефоны в карманах.<БР />единственный недостаток-это провода, кажется, flimsly и не прочный, так должно watchout для неприятных пользователей вроде меня.<любители БР />качество звука 5 звезд должен купить для всех музыка

а качество звука приятно конечно.
на прочность, пока.. после использования в течение месяца, будет вернуться, если что-то пойдет не так. Для начала, чтобы прокомментировать долговечности.<БР />спасибо


Starting with a packaging, both CKR9 and CKR10 outer sleeve greets your with a high res picture of these little beauties with a distinguished detail of Aluminum silver-color theme of CKR9 and Titanium gold-color theme of CKR10. On the back you have a lot info in both Japanese and English with a list of features, specs, and the close up of the internal drivers config. One thing is to read the description, but it's a whole different experience to see the actual detailed assembly of the drivers. It also shows how much pride AT takes in their product showcasing their design, similar to what I found with their IM0x IEMs. After sliding out the sleeve and removing the top cover, both CKR9 and CRK10 models have the same display presentation and identical accessories with IEMs inside of the foam cutout, a premium leather case in the lower left corner, and a set of eartips in the lower right corner.
Starting with a plug, you have a very sturdy 90deg hard plastic housing and gold-plated connector with an excellent strain relief and enough extension to fit any audio player or heavy duty phone case. The only difference here is a slim metal ring detail on the plug of CKR10 to distinguish its premium appeal. Moving to the cable you have a soft rubber shielding which is a bit sticky and unfortunately prone to some tangling. The cable design is partitioned in a way where you have a left/right wires from each earpiece with signal/ground going all the way down to 3.5mm connector keeping the ground wires of L/R sides separate. As a result, you have a very basic y-splitter clip separating individual wires from a dual attached one going to the plug. There is no chin slider which is not a show stopper since it's usually helpful for over-ear fitment, although it makes me wonder if chin slider would have been helpful to keep cables from moving to mitigate a considerable amount of microphonics introduced by the cable.
Moving up to earpieces, first thing you will notice is a high quality strain relief. Considering CKR9/10 don't have a removable cable, I was very pleased to see a well designed and attached soft rubber tube strain relief that was sturdy enough to be handled even while removing headphones from your ears. I found the shape of the shell to have a perfect size (not too big or too small) and an excellent fitment for my medium size ears, and we are talking about two rather large drivers enclosed in a metal housing surrounded by a plastic shell. To improve ergonomics of fitment, CKR models have a cable attached at the front rather than back allowing a more comfortable inner ear fitment. Together with an angled nozzle I found it to fit my ears like a glove, even before I started tip rolling. I guess there is a way you can try over-ear wiring, but the extension of strain relief will get in the way. Another thing worth mentioning, there is a slim port opening on the back which I assume actually functioning rather than for looks.
This brings me to the most important part of the review - the sound analysis. Unlike other AT headphones I tested in the past where incremental model number meant an additional driver or a more significant design change, I found CRK9/10 numbering to just distinguish two different sound signatures. Before starting my test, I was well aware these dynamic drivers require a burn in, thus I put them through at least 50+ hrs of play in free air for a proper conditioning. A quick note, right out of the box the bass was more exaggerated in both models, but afterwards it settled down nicely along with more refinement in high frequencies.
If you look at overall tonality of CKR9/CKR10, they both have a nicely balanced signature with a decent extension at both ends of the spectrum. But individually their sound tuning follows two different directions. Also, due to a brighter nature of CKR9 I was using their stock narrow bore tip to reduce some higher frequency peaks, while for CKR10 I switched to UE900 tips with a medium bore opening for an opposite effect to open up higher frequencies which also widened soundstage perception and made sound more natural.
With CKR9, it has a smooth analytical/neutral (a blend in between) sound which is on a brighter side. Starting with a low end, it has a well controlled



Если вы сравните это с Sennheiser, Sennheiser и получил удивительный бас, но ясности это не очень гуд..
а вот бас сбалансированные и ясность очень хорошая..просто пойти на это,если вам скучно с Sennheiser.лол

я уже через senheiser серии CX 180 Street и II из последних 3 лет. Это хорошо. Изначально это было плохо, но с некоторыми доработками, она действительно хороша, особенно, когда какая-то смесь из низких, а затем высоких частот, оно заставляет вас чувствовать себя действительно хорошо. Бедный бас. Trebels очень хорошие. Кабели блестящие и они не очень messup, когда вы держите их в карманах. Контейнер для того чтобы держать кабели в плюсы продукта.

I have used a ton of generic and some basic earbuds-phones such as OEM Samsung earbuds which come with the S5. In terms of headphones, I was using Sony MDRZX300 headphones. The Sony Headphones were light but not amazing in terms of quality by any means. I then decided to move up a little in budget and went with these and I can say I am done searching for headphones. These headphones lived up to all the amazing reviews and research I did before buying a replacement set.
Pros
The sound quality is simply perfect in my opinion. I want to hear a crisp, clear, full sound with a solid bass. (Not a distorted or overly emphasized bass.) The sound is exactly so. You get a very nice bass, but not one that will taint the other mids-highs or cause any distortion when listening. As others have stated, I can now hear a far greater amount of detail that was never present before and the depth is much greater as well.
-Headphone cushion on the head band is very nice and feels good. (I have a bald head so it was nice to have something padded up there.)
-The cord is just the right length and is a nice thickness. The 3.5mm is a nice right ankle with gold plating.
-The design allows a nominal amount of background through. (They are not noise cancelling.) I find the amount of audio it keeps out perfect. Enough for me to enjoy my music and detail, yet lets enough through I can hear my daughter or wife calling for me if they need something.
Notes - For those who have asked if they could benefit from an amplifier, I think this is a two tone question. All of my audio devices power these perfectly, however, I would have to say that since the quality is above standard and since it has such a nice range, you could certainly use one if you have the extra and take full advantage of the sound quality this product has the ability to make. (Some times the device you use will limit your ultimate sound quality and an amplifier may improve some devices sound.)
Now if only I can find an earbud set that provides an equal quality of sound!
Cons
-After use longer then 1/2 to 1hr my ears tend to be sore. (I believe the tension just ever so slightly more than I want.) While you can adjust overall fit, it would be nice for it to have some way to loosen the overall tension you have with the ear pads against the ears.
-Ear pads could be a little bigger. (While they are big, my ears are just ever so slightly larger. It would be nice to have an aftermarket selection of different size ear pads to change to for a more perfect fit for those with bigger or smaller ears.
-Has a double cord that is not detachable. (Not sure this counts as a con as you get what you pay for. Audio Technica makes products with this feature and you get what you pay for.

звук четкости очень плохо, не тратьте деньги на этот продукт зайдите в Sennheiser СХ 180 лучших Prouct как в сравнении с этим наушником




The mids are a little bit recessed and the highs do not really sparkle. These fit in the basshead/fun category of my headphones (WS99, UE6000, Ultrafocus 8000, HD598, HE400, M100, Kef M500, Fidelio L2). Others in that collection would be UE6000, Ultrafocus8000, and the M100. UE and M100 win on aesthetics, UE wins on comfort. I would say sound-wise and a close runner-up on all other important items with exception to comfort, would be the Ultrafocus 8000 by Polk. These WS99 vs UE6000, WS99 vs M100, and WS99 vs Ultrafocus 8000; the WS99 gets narrowly defeated on each battle.
Comfort:
1: WS99
2: UE6000
3: M100
4. Ultrafocus 8000
Aesthetics:
(most subjective for sure, the WS99 record look and feel on the earcups is very cool, but I feel the white UE6000's look most impressive)
Hit/Rumble of bass:
1. Ultrafocus 8000
2. M100
3. UE6000/WS99
Clarity of Mids (very difficult for a bass-head phone to pull of:
1. M100
2. Ultrafocus 8000
3. UE6000
4. WS99
Sparkle and crispness of highs:
1. M100 by far
2. Ultrafocus 8000
3. UE6000/WS99
For use on mobile phones:
1. Ultrafocus 8000; convenient controls on earcups and call clarity on receiving end receives the least complaints. NOTE: the Ultrafocus headphones do NOT fold up, which can be a big disadvantage for it, but it does come with a nice and flat hard case for it.
2. WS99; the reason this gets #2 and a VERY close to number one is that it has a nice microphone attached cable, but it has a very short cable coming from the top. This means its very handle to connect into a clip-on bluetooth device such as the Audio-technica AT-PHA05BT and have minimal wires to deal with. For bluetooth use, the M100 and UE6000 paired with a short 3.5mm to 3.5mm aux cable found on amazon for $5 works very well, however, and can be even LESS cables.
3. UE6000/M100
Accessories:
1. M100; revolutionary skeleton case, two cables, and all adapters
2. UE6000; case, adapters, two cables
3. Ultrafocus 8000; one flat cable, adapters, nice flat case
4. WS99; two cables, adapters
In all, this is a great headphone. I have compared them against other heavy-hitters, and there is going to be some amount of subjectivity to any headphone side-by-side or review. Any one of the aforementioned headphones would be worth a listen/try. In a perfect world, you could try all four of them somewhere in person, but you are stuck going off of what someone else says. But when I want a bass/sub bass that I can really feel, I continually am impressed with Polk's Ultrafocus 8000; which is only slightly more bassy than the Polk Buckle (another excellent competitor of these). I hate to take business away from any company, but in this case I have to be on the side of the consumer and tell you my experience having had the blessing of owning many different pairs. If you have other questions or comparisons to other headphones with this, I'd be happy to offer my two cents.
What would I say Ultrafocus 8000 vs M100?! Well, that's a battle of the best (bass head) right there. In my opinion, there isn't a very clear winner. As far as thundering bass goes, Ultrafocus 8000 actually WINS. But, when up against the rest of the sound spectrum, the M100 WINS. For a more clear and crisp sound, go for the M100. For a more warm sound, go for the Ulltrafocus 8000's. But, you know what, if you're a basshead, you really ought to save up for both.... If you're cost concious and can't afford either of those two, get the UE6000's; they are going rediculous cheap right now (7/17/14), and I recommend the white ones; you won't be disappointed.

на бас-тяжелые вещи - то, что я купил его для. ВЧ немного резковато на мой вкус.
в Мидс не может быть, что произносится. Другие, чем, что я считаю совершенно фантастические. Не передергивай на любом уровне.
это немного тяжело, но ты не мог чувствовать, потому что подходят отлично с их с-концы.<БР />провод достаточно длинный, но не очень хорошо для задней части шеи петлей.

эти банки для бас-головы!
также, размер с-Советов довольно большие, не рекомендуется для тех, кто с меньшим ухо, будет много неприятных ощущений!

First off, I'd like to thank the kind folks at Audio-Technica for providing a review sample of the CKS1000.
Yes, this is it, the final and entry into the Solid Bass lineup, the most expensive and (hopefully) best sounding CKS earphone of them all. Retailing for $250, the CKS1000 is far beyond what many would consider "impulse buy" territory and entered the realm of a rather significant investment. It also runs against some significant competition at this price point so it will have to offer a competitively detailed quality of sound to be worth its price over its competitors.
So, does the CKS1000 have what it takes to stand out or is it destined to be lost in the crowd? Read on to find out.
Accessories: Inside the rather lavish packaging are four pairs of silicone eartips, a set of manuals a leather carrying case and two audio cables that, much like the WS99, attach just below the y-split. One is a standard audio-only cable and the other includes a built in remote and microphone with volume adjustment.
Design and Build Quality: The housings of the CKS1000 are plastic and similar to the CKS99 but feature a few nicer accents to differentiate it from the lower end models. Overall, the earphones seem nicely built with sturdy cables and black plastic housings with a soft touch feel and a rubberized ring around the edges where the housings come into contact with your outer ear.
Comfort: Like its siblings, the fit of the CKS1000 could be a point of contention for some but I was once again pleased with the fit of the CKS1000 as it was mostly unobtrusive for me over long periods. The driver sat in my outer ear nicely without exerting any unpleasant pressure.
Isolation: These isolate well for a vented dynamic IEM.
Microphonics: A tad unpleasant at times but nothing excessive.
Sound Quality
Burn in: The CKS1000 was given upwards of 100 hours of burn in time prior to review. Minor changes were detected, particularly in the upper regions, which smoothed out slightly and the bass, which mellowed a bit.
The bottom end is, as should be expected by this point, forward and plentiful. As with the previous models, the midbass seems a tad more prominent than the sub bass, which reaches down low with good authority but doesn't quite match up with the deep bass rumble of other bass centric IEMs like the Miles Davis Tributes or Wooduo 2 as it rolls off gradually past 60Hz or so. The CKS1000 does manage to impress overall with its dry and detailed low end that has the authority to demand notice and the tightness necessary to avoid occluding the lower mids...most of the time.
The midrange is a tiny bit recessed but retains the ability to put vocals at the center of the presentation like the CKS99 and like its sibling, the midrange is a tad grainy and veiled but still quite detailed and energetic. This is not a "lay back and relax" type of IEM, this is an earphone that makes sure you're engaged at all times. In some ways, this can be a bit of a detriment as it makes the CKS1000 more prone to sibilance than I'd like. The treble, while a bit less emphasized compared to the rest of the sound signature, is rather peaky and doesn't extend as far as I'd like but is clear and airy and has plenty of sparkle.
The overall presentation of the CKS1000 is drier than a good martini but as alluring as the smile on the sexy bartender who served it to you. The presentation is edgy and forward with a good sense of space and separation between vocalists and instruments and does a good job of presenting micro detail on the level of Like the other Solid Bass earphones, I can easily close my eyes and imagine I'm standing in a nice nightclub, dressed in a smart suit, a martini glass held loosely between my fingers. But unlike the CKS77 and CKS99, I'm not in the middle of the crowd, I'm looking out over it from the VIP section.
But I have to address the flaws I mentioned before once again and I'm sure this is going to sound like some apologist nonsense to some but hear me out. No one would be remiss in pointing out the peaky treble, veiled midrange or huge bass as valid criticisms, especially for a $200+ IEM but somehow, the flaws tend to melt away over extended periods. Sure, the CKS1000 does sound veiled next to the RE-400 but they have a very engaging, energetic quality that's oddly alluring. And then, you look up and 20 minutes have gone by and you're left wondering what you were complaining about before.
Conclusion
The Audio-Technica CKS1000 is available from various online retailers including Amazon for wildly varying prices. On Amazon I've seen them as low as $170 plus shipping from Japanese sellers and around $210 from US based sellers. On eBay, the price varies as well but finding one below $200 or so may be quite difficult. For the price, I think they're a prett

I prefer this over the CKR10 which has a more closely packed soundstage, stronger bass, and rolled back highs. But the trade off being it has sweeter mids. Vocal representation sounded better on that variant, so look into that if you're into that kind of thing.
What is preventing this from, getting 5 stars? The comfort. No matter how I adjust it, even after changing serveral ear tips, I always feel some discomfort after about 15 minutes of wearing. Its not unbearable, but enough to be noticable everytime. On top of that,the cable as you can tell from the pictures, is non detachable, and for an earphone of this price and caliber I would expect Audio-Technica to include one. The cable is generally alright, but it does feel flimsy at times. I always feel the need to carefully coil it up before storing it in my pelican case. The microphonics are terrible too, and since its not detachable you don't have the option to swap it out for a better one.
As a side remark, I highly recommend getting a set of JVC Spiral Dot Tips for use with this earphone. The dots in the tips act as a diffuser of some sort and it helps open up the soundstage a little more while taming a bit of the highs. The Comply foam tips work great as well, and I currently use them with the Ts-400. They will fit perfectly.
I cannot recommend these enough. They will honestly surprise you. Audio-Technica's engineers have done an AMAZING job and this product indeed lives up to its marketing. I'll say it again, this is most natural sounding dyanmic driver earphone I have ever heard, and the sound alone is well worth the price, though I wish it had detachable cables.

First off, I'd like to thank the folks at Audio-Technica for the sample of the WS99 for review.
Here it is, the pinnacle of Audio-Technica's "Solid Bass" line of portable headphones, the WS99. Arriving in a big, audacious black box, the WS99 makes its presence known with its sharp (literally) aluminum accents, its large but not heavy construction and promises of excellent bass and sound quality. Jumping into the premium price bracket, with an MSRP of $250, sending it into direct competition with the Beats by Dre Studios, the original consumer focused portable headphone and, frankly, fashion accessory. So, does the WS99 measure up as a suitable king of the Solid Bass hill and make a solid case for your cash? Read on to find out.
Accessories: The WS99 includes two interchangeable cables. The first cable is a standard extension and the other features a built in microphone, sliding volume control and one button remote.
Design and Build Quality: At the top of the Solid Bass food chain, the WS99 is a hefty and beefy portable headphone that feels heavier and more solidly built than the WS77. The detachable cables are nicely built and feel durable.
Comfort: The WS99 is actually quite comfortable with its bigger and slightly softer pads. Despite the fact that I don't particularly love on-ear headphones, I found the WS99 to be quite comfortable over long periods.
Isolation: The WS99 isolates well for a non-circumaural headphone, despite the fact that the WS99 is semi-open.
Sound Quality
Burn in: These were given 100+ hours of burn in prior to review. A lower treble spike I noticed early on mellowed out over time.
Having heard its siblings, I was hardly surprised by the type of sound signature the WS99 presents. Put simply, it's an evolution on the signature of the WS77 but with refinements in key places that make it audibly superior.
The low end is, like the WS77, very full bodied and well detailed but with a bit more sub bass extension to really liven things up. Though the bass is obviously emphasized, it's totally unobtrusive and really only steps forward when asked. In some cases, you might not notice that it's emphasized until you put on a song that calls for a meaty low end, say Daft Punk's Get Lucky and the WS99 really shows how punchy and engaging it can be. That 53mm driver can produce some powerful, but controlled, bass.
The midrange is lush and smooth, lacking the slight hollowness I noticed in the WS77 and sounds quite full and pleasant. It's quite clear despite its warmth and smoothness and sounds absolutely lovely with Jazz and R&B pieces. The lower treble is a bit forward which occasionally results in a tiny bit of sibilance but nothing especially annoying or irritating. The treble presence is neither forward nor recessed but carries a nice sense of sparkle and is well extended.
The soundstage is fairly wide and deep for a closed portable can but the WS99 is also quite good at presenting a sense of intimacy due to the smooth and lush nature of the midrange and the sonic image is quite accurate. Its overall presentation is a well-balanced one, despite the enhanced bass, one that isn't neutral but is well controlled with good linearity through the midrange and treble that makes for a quite pleasing sound.
Conclusion
The WS99 sits at the pinnacle of the Audio-Technica's "Solid Bass" line and unsurprisingly sounds the best of the three headphones in that line. Its sound is rich and engaging and works with a wide array of different genres. The casual crowd should love it for its emphasized bass and good looks while the audiophile will appreciate its attention to detail and engaging sound.
The Audio-Technica WS99 is available from a number online retailers for prices hovering between $170 and $220 on Amazon and even higher than its $250 MSRP, which is rather mind boggling. At the $211 price (at the time of writing) from Amazon directly, I think the WS99 is a great portable headphone that earns its keep with its sound quality alone.
The only problem is, at about $100 more than the WS77 based solely on its MSRP. If I were to grade the two, I'd say the WS77 is maybe 85 to 90 percent of the WS99 in terms of pure sound quality but the WS99 gains more points over the WS77 in terms of build, comfort and versatility. So, if money is tight, the WS77 is still an excellent choice but if you can afford the extra cash, the WS99 is definitely the headphone to buy for its more refined and engaging sound signature and certainly the best I've heard in a portable headphone. I hate sounding like a shill, especially since I'm not being paid for this, but if you're willing to pay the relatively high price (and seeing as Beats Audio holds a commanding portion of the upper end headphone market, I'd imagine many are), the WS99 is a great headphone

при этом наушники имеют очень хорошее качество звука и особенно я предпочитаю слушать мелодии с этими наушниками.
- и шумоподавление лучше, чем мои предыдущие наушники.
это очень хорошо вписывается в уши и вам не придется беспокоиться о его падения.<БР />- микрофон хороший, и кнопки регулировки громкости удобно гладкой.<бр /><бр />* единственное, что я чувствую, как обратная сторона этого продукта является то, что микрофон висит намного ниже моей шеи, и каждый раз мне нужно ответить на звонок нужно провести на микрофон с одной стороны.<БР />
Для людей, которые говорят, что наушники все время сваливаюсь, вы должны попробовать изменение частей уха до уха подойдет вам. Потому что есть маленькие,средние и большие наушники. Мне пришлось меняться от средних до крупных, а средних бутонов продолжал падать, но большой, для меня, работает просто отлично.
