Отзывы о Наушники Audio-Technica ATH-M20X
1435 отзывов пользователей o Audio-Technica ATH-M20X
Пользовались
Audio-Technica ATH-M20X?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Скроменый эксперт
01.02.2017
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
мой левый наушник есть проблема и я пытаюсь ...
мой левый наушник есть проблема и я пытаюсь выяснить число для обслуживания клиентов, которое я не смог за последние 1 месяц. Его даже не два месяца, как я купил эти наушники.
Скроменый эксперт
13.02.2014
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
This was the final pair that I wanted to try and I suspected that they may just the perfect pair based on all the glowing reviews. Out of 6 headphones that I ordered between $180-$299, with the intention of finding headphones with good bass for listening to modern music, this pair is just okay, and in my opinion not worth the price if it's not on sale for under $200. I would not recommend them over most of the other similarly-priced pairs.
Bass:
The bass on these headphones is plentiful, but the emphasis is not right. The most noticeable volume boost on this pair happens around 100hz to 250hz, meaning they give you a lot of low-mid thump. Below that, they sound very average, and the deep, extended bass does not impress. The bass bump is misplaced enough to affect even female vocals, and often times create a very unnatural sound. All of the other headphones I tried that were bass-oriented did not have this problem. Honestly, this sound signature makes headphones sound like cheap headphones, barely saved by the decent mids and highs.
Mids and highs:
Mids and highs sound surprisingly well-balanced. The mid is present and natural, and the highs are smooth. There is definitely nothing missing in the entire upper range, and no serious distortion of sound. The extended highs are relaxed, and although you can hear the sparkly parts of the song, they are quiet. I think this is a good approach on its own, but in combination with the "bass", it really does not help the problem of mud.
Overall, I think the bass is the biggest flaw for these headphones, even if you are looking for headphones with "solid bass" or if you are a basshead. The bass just thumps and creates a claustrophobic sound without giving you that rumble that we want to hear as if listening with a nice subwoofer. With these headphones you will never get an exciting sound because there aren't enough highs to balance out the bass. With all that said, these headphones do not sound horrible, but in a lineup of the headphones that I tried, I doubt anyone would pick this pair. Oh, and they also press against my ears and are not comfortable for extended listening sessions over an hour.
The pairs that I tried that I can sincerely recommend over this pair are:
Beyerdynamic Custom One Pro: has somewhat useful adjustable bass feature, and has very good bass and a warm sound that's also exciting and good for all types of music. The least expensive option, and if on sale is undoubtedly the best sound for the price out of these pairs. SUPER comfortable.
Denon D600: has a very warm sound with a good amount of bass, especially extended bass, but a little sloppy-sounding. Also has really crispy extended highs that are not sibilant. Comfortable for long-period listening.
V-moda M100: This one is a basshead's dream, with a very fun sound, but the mids are a little bit lacking. Uncomfortable for long-term listening, presses against the ears. I had to order the XL earpads for $25 to fix this problem.
AKG K545: The pair that I decided to keep. It has a bright sound that is not warm, but also with lots of deep, extended bass. I picked this pair out of all 6 pairs because it is suitable for all types of music and has very good highs, although the bass might not have enough thump or impact for true bassheads. These are also not comfortable for extended listening periods, so I took apart the earpads and stuffed cotton inside, which was a very good solution to the comfort issue, and gave a better seal for more rumbly bass.
NAD VISO HP50: Has a very balanced and analytical, but somewhat warm sound without much extended highs nor bass. I would not recommend these if you like to listen to modern music that utilizes the full range of human hearing, especially hip hop or electronic music. These press against your ears, but I'm not sure if they are comfortable for extended listening periods, as I decided almost immediately to repack them and return them.
Bass:
The bass on these headphones is plentiful, but the emphasis is not right. The most noticeable volume boost on this pair happens around 100hz to 250hz, meaning they give you a lot of low-mid thump. Below that, they sound very average, and the deep, extended bass does not impress. The bass bump is misplaced enough to affect even female vocals, and often times create a very unnatural sound. All of the other headphones I tried that were bass-oriented did not have this problem. Honestly, this sound signature makes headphones sound like cheap headphones, barely saved by the decent mids and highs.
Mids and highs:
Mids and highs sound surprisingly well-balanced. The mid is present and natural, and the highs are smooth. There is definitely nothing missing in the entire upper range, and no serious distortion of sound. The extended highs are relaxed, and although you can hear the sparkly parts of the song, they are quiet. I think this is a good approach on its own, but in combination with the "bass", it really does not help the problem of mud.
Overall, I think the bass is the biggest flaw for these headphones, even if you are looking for headphones with "solid bass" or if you are a basshead. The bass just thumps and creates a claustrophobic sound without giving you that rumble that we want to hear as if listening with a nice subwoofer. With these headphones you will never get an exciting sound because there aren't enough highs to balance out the bass. With all that said, these headphones do not sound horrible, but in a lineup of the headphones that I tried, I doubt anyone would pick this pair. Oh, and they also press against my ears and are not comfortable for extended listening sessions over an hour.
The pairs that I tried that I can sincerely recommend over this pair are:
Beyerdynamic Custom One Pro: has somewhat useful adjustable bass feature, and has very good bass and a warm sound that's also exciting and good for all types of music. The least expensive option, and if on sale is undoubtedly the best sound for the price out of these pairs. SUPER comfortable.
Denon D600: has a very warm sound with a good amount of bass, especially extended bass, but a little sloppy-sounding. Also has really crispy extended highs that are not sibilant. Comfortable for long-period listening.
V-moda M100: This one is a basshead's dream, with a very fun sound, but the mids are a little bit lacking. Uncomfortable for long-term listening, presses against the ears. I had to order the XL earpads for $25 to fix this problem.
AKG K545: The pair that I decided to keep. It has a bright sound that is not warm, but also with lots of deep, extended bass. I picked this pair out of all 6 pairs because it is suitable for all types of music and has very good highs, although the bass might not have enough thump or impact for true bassheads. These are also not comfortable for extended listening periods, so I took apart the earpads and stuffed cotton inside, which was a very good solution to the comfort issue, and gave a better seal for more rumbly bass.
NAD VISO HP50: Has a very balanced and analytical, but somewhat warm sound without much extended highs nor bass. I would not recommend these if you like to listen to modern music that utilizes the full range of human hearing, especially hip hop or electronic music. These press against your ears, but I'm not sure if they are comfortable for extended listening periods, as I decided almost immediately to repack them and return them.
Скроменый эксперт
01.11.2016
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Не для любителей баса.
Эти замечательные наушники по цене он доступен.<БР />
он имеет кристально чистый звук.Мы можем услышать каждого и каждой детали музыки.<БР />
но только одно в этих наушниках я испытал, это то, что бас чуть меньше.Эти наушники не для любителей баса.Баса немного меньше.В противном случае эти наушники значение для денег.
он имеет кристально чистый звук.Мы можем услышать каждого и каждой детали музыки.<БР />
но только одно в этих наушниках я испытал, это то, что бас чуть меньше.Эти наушники не для любителей баса.Баса немного меньше.В противном случае эти наушники значение для денег.
Скроменый эксперт
01.12.2016
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Проблемы дисбаланса канал
Недавно купил их через Amazon. Есть большая проблема дисбаланса канал с этими наушниками. Я не знаю, если это мой кусок или весь спектр, но эта проблема полностью разрушает прослушивания. Также аудио техника не реагирует на это!!
Скроменый эксперт
25.05.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Introduction
First off, I'd like to thank the folks at Audio-Technica for the sample of the WS77 for review.
Yes, I've been on something of a roll recently with Audio-Technica headphones. First the Audio-Technica ATH-WS55BK, then the Audio-Technica ATH-PRO700MK2 and now the next entry into the Solid Bass portable headphone line, the WS77, which slots in between the WS55 and WS99 as the mid-range option in their lineup. Having heard the WS55 and finding it good but unrefined, can the WS77 outshine its sibling and offer a more compelling option to those looking for a portable headphone? Read on to find out.
Accessories: None to speak of.
Design and Build Quality: The lightweight plastic construction is more robust than that of the lower end WS55 in part due to the aluminum faceplates on the earcups and feels fairly sturdy, but I'd probably still baby them a bit more than many other headphones I've used. The dual entry cable feels about as good as the WS55's and they fold flat but don't completely fold up like the M50 and Pro700MK2 but isn't nearly as large as those two either.
Comfort: The WS77 is a supra-aural (on ear) headphone with rather soft and cushy pads both on the earcups and headband and doesn't clamp as hard as some other supra-aural cans I've used. The result is a very tolerable fit (on- ear cans usually annoy me) and one that I can enjoy for longer periods without too much discomfort.
Isolation: These isolate well for a supra-aural can and sound leakage is minimal.
Sound Quality
Burn In: These were burned in for upwards of 50 hours prior to review, after which the bass seemed a bit tighter and the highs and upper mids were a little less prominent.
As Audio-Technica's mid-range entry into its "Solid Bass" line, the WS77 is expectedly improved over the cheaper WS55 but to a surprisingly significant degree. The low end, while still quite powerful and robust, isn't nearly as mid-bass happy or as bloated as the WS55. Extension is good, rolling off gently after about 60 - 70Hz or so. There's a nice degree of texture to the bass that I didn't find in the WS55 as well but it doesn't have the same level of detail as the Pro700MK2.
Moving up, the midrange sounds slightly recessed but only slightly and not as much so as the WS55. Thanks to the newfound tightness in the low end, it doesn't smear the midrange presentation. Truth be told, I actually find the midrange quite enjoyable and its clarity and detail is quite good. It doesn't have the same kind of upper-mid sibilance I heard from the WS55 and presents vocals better because of it. I must note that there's a bit of hollowness in the mids that I can't seem to shake but it wasn't a significant issue.
The treble presentation is somewhat forward and sparkly but not "bright". It generally remains smooth and fairly airy without unpleasant peaks or grain. There is a bit of roll off at the top end but the WS77 carries enough treble energy and detail to avoid sounding too "dark".
The presentation is fairly spacious for a portable closed headphone and rarely sounds muffled or excessively closed in. The sound is nicely layered and imaging is pretty good overall. Tonally, I'd say the sound is a tad warm and sweet with nice, emphasized but well controlled bass that plays especially well with Jazz, Electronic and Hip-Hop but is versatile enough to sound pretty good with just about everything.
Conclusion
It's pretty obvious at this point that I think these are significantly better than the lower end WS55. The sound signature is better balanced, more detailed and better all-around for a wider range of music than the lower end model. But, is the WS77 worth the going rates of about $120 up from sites like Amazon and other authorized retailers (side note: be careful when buying these from just anywhere since a large number of Audio-Technica headphones have been counterfeited and these might be as well)? As far as I'm concerned, yes. I think these are a very good choice for a stylish and great sounding pair of portable headphones as the WS77 strikes a very good balance between the bass-driven, consumer-oriented sound many casual users crave and the kind of high fidelity audiophiles desire. Because of this balance, the WS77 should appeal to a wide range of listeners, perhaps even those who don't care for emphasized bass.
First off, I'd like to thank the folks at Audio-Technica for the sample of the WS77 for review.
Yes, I've been on something of a roll recently with Audio-Technica headphones. First the Audio-Technica ATH-WS55BK, then the Audio-Technica ATH-PRO700MK2 and now the next entry into the Solid Bass portable headphone line, the WS77, which slots in between the WS55 and WS99 as the mid-range option in their lineup. Having heard the WS55 and finding it good but unrefined, can the WS77 outshine its sibling and offer a more compelling option to those looking for a portable headphone? Read on to find out.
Accessories: None to speak of.
Design and Build Quality: The lightweight plastic construction is more robust than that of the lower end WS55 in part due to the aluminum faceplates on the earcups and feels fairly sturdy, but I'd probably still baby them a bit more than many other headphones I've used. The dual entry cable feels about as good as the WS55's and they fold flat but don't completely fold up like the M50 and Pro700MK2 but isn't nearly as large as those two either.
Comfort: The WS77 is a supra-aural (on ear) headphone with rather soft and cushy pads both on the earcups and headband and doesn't clamp as hard as some other supra-aural cans I've used. The result is a very tolerable fit (on- ear cans usually annoy me) and one that I can enjoy for longer periods without too much discomfort.
Isolation: These isolate well for a supra-aural can and sound leakage is minimal.
Sound Quality
Burn In: These were burned in for upwards of 50 hours prior to review, after which the bass seemed a bit tighter and the highs and upper mids were a little less prominent.
As Audio-Technica's mid-range entry into its "Solid Bass" line, the WS77 is expectedly improved over the cheaper WS55 but to a surprisingly significant degree. The low end, while still quite powerful and robust, isn't nearly as mid-bass happy or as bloated as the WS55. Extension is good, rolling off gently after about 60 - 70Hz or so. There's a nice degree of texture to the bass that I didn't find in the WS55 as well but it doesn't have the same level of detail as the Pro700MK2.
Moving up, the midrange sounds slightly recessed but only slightly and not as much so as the WS55. Thanks to the newfound tightness in the low end, it doesn't smear the midrange presentation. Truth be told, I actually find the midrange quite enjoyable and its clarity and detail is quite good. It doesn't have the same kind of upper-mid sibilance I heard from the WS55 and presents vocals better because of it. I must note that there's a bit of hollowness in the mids that I can't seem to shake but it wasn't a significant issue.
The treble presentation is somewhat forward and sparkly but not "bright". It generally remains smooth and fairly airy without unpleasant peaks or grain. There is a bit of roll off at the top end but the WS77 carries enough treble energy and detail to avoid sounding too "dark".
The presentation is fairly spacious for a portable closed headphone and rarely sounds muffled or excessively closed in. The sound is nicely layered and imaging is pretty good overall. Tonally, I'd say the sound is a tad warm and sweet with nice, emphasized but well controlled bass that plays especially well with Jazz, Electronic and Hip-Hop but is versatile enough to sound pretty good with just about everything.
Conclusion
It's pretty obvious at this point that I think these are significantly better than the lower end WS55. The sound signature is better balanced, more detailed and better all-around for a wider range of music than the lower end model. But, is the WS77 worth the going rates of about $120 up from sites like Amazon and other authorized retailers (side note: be careful when buying these from just anywhere since a large number of Audio-Technica headphones have been counterfeited and these might be as well)? As far as I'm concerned, yes. I think these are a very good choice for a stylish and great sounding pair of portable headphones as the WS77 strikes a very good balance between the bass-driven, consumer-oriented sound many casual users crave and the kind of high fidelity audiophiles desire. Because of this balance, the WS77 should appeal to a wide range of listeners, perhaps even those who don't care for emphasized bass.
Скроменый эксперт
05.03.2016
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Got these to wear to the gym (I don't like earbuds). They are lightweight without being cheaply made. I was looking for something without too much "colored" sound. The model I really wanted would have taken a month to get, shipped from Japan. I checked out a number of brands and was surprised how many expensive headphones lacked in various frequencies, or over-emphasized them (especially the bass). The bass in these could be a little clearer. And as in many of the headphones I listened to, could use more clarity in the midrange frequencies. The high frequencies are clear without a piercing sound, something I really appreciate. I wish I could have found a pair as good as my monitoring headphones (Audio-Technica ATH-M50's) but these are fine. The pads don't quite fit around the whole ear (on-ear models seem to be popular right now) and could be uncomfortable for some.
Скроменый эксперт
09.01.2016
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I'm not really one to leave a written review, but I just had to say that these are by far the best portable headphones I've ever purchased in my life. I'm not really an audiophile, but I've gone through a good number of headphones in my past (with my last earbuds being Sennheiser CX 300 II).
After having tried their flagship M50X, I was satisfied enough to try a pair of ATH earbuds. While not quite the same, that quality signature carries out in these headphones. From the splash from the highs to the punch of the bass and that clarity in between, nothing seems to suffer. About the only negative thing I can say is that the wire does produce some rustling, but it's not hard to ignore it. The amount of sound they block out is worth mention too (obviously it's not 100%, but definitely more than your average pair). Comfort is also a plus.
I'm entirely satisfied. While I'm not familiar with the other models, I can say that these are worth what you pay for (possibly more). I'd recommend these to anyone in the market for quality ATH earbuds.
After having tried their flagship M50X, I was satisfied enough to try a pair of ATH earbuds. While not quite the same, that quality signature carries out in these headphones. From the splash from the highs to the punch of the bass and that clarity in between, nothing seems to suffer. About the only negative thing I can say is that the wire does produce some rustling, but it's not hard to ignore it. The amount of sound they block out is worth mention too (obviously it's not 100%, but definitely more than your average pair). Comfort is also a plus.
I'm entirely satisfied. While I'm not familiar with the other models, I can say that these are worth what you pay for (possibly more). I'd recommend these to anyone in the market for quality ATH earbuds.
Скроменый эксперт
17.07.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Introduction
First off, I'd like to thank the folks at Audio-Technica for providing a review sample of the CKS99.
Up for review is the mid-range entry into the Solid Bass line of in ear monitors from Audio-Technica, the CKS99. So, without further ado, let's get right to it, shall we?
Accessories: The CKS99 comes with four pairs of silicone eartips, a set of manuals and a leather carrying case.
Design and Build Quality: The housings of the CKS99 are plastic and similar to the CKS77 but feature a few nicer accents to differentiate it from the lower end model. Overall, the earphones seem nicely built with sturdy cables and black plastic housings with a soft touch feel to them around the edges where the housings come into contact with your outer ear.
Comfort: Like the CKS77, the fit of the CKS99 could be a point of contention for some but I was once again very pleased with the fit of the CKS99 as it was quite comfortable for me over long periods. The driver sat in my outer ear nicely without exerting any unpleasant pressure.
Isolation: These isolate very well for a vented dynamic IEM.
Microphonics: A tad unpleasant at times but nothing excessive.
Sound Quality
Burn in: The CKS99 was given 50+ hours of burn in time prior to review and no significant changes were detected.
Like the CKS77, the CKS99 features prominent bass, a clear but recessed midrange and prominent treble. To go into further detail on the sound signature and the ways in which it improves over its sibling, let's start at the bottom.
The bass is big and full with slightly more emphasis on the midbass than sub bass and merely okay extension. If there's a lot of midbass emphasis on a track, the midbass hump will become incredibly obvious and distracting. Like the CKS77, the bass has a tendency to step up on the lower midrange which can end up sounding rather "thick" as a result.
The midrange retains some of the "hollow" character from the CKS77 but is surprisingly forward in presentation. Instruments sometimes sound a bit recessed but vocals are front and center. The midrange as a whole is actually rather smooth and detailed. Claritiy is good and the presentation is reasonably linear. In terms of pure detail, the CKS99 is ahead of its sibling but not quite on the level of the RE-400.
Treble is a bit less even and the lower treble is occasionally prone to sibilance but on the whole, the airiness of the treble combined with its good presence and great extension make it rather pleasant on the whole.
Presentation wise, the CKS99 eschews a bit of the claustrophobic spaciousness that I noticed on the CKS77 and sounds just as open but even more intimate, with vocals being very forward in the presentation. This sounds rather odd, considering the slightly recessed nature of the midrange but there it is. Along with the big bass, vocals do a great job of standing out and being heard.
Conclusion
Now this is where things get interesting. The CKS99 retails for $150 while the CKS77 retails for $120. However, I've found the CKS99 for $93 and the CKS77 for $99. If you're in the market for either one, the CKS99 is easily the better pick.
Like the CKS77, however, the CKS99 also comes with some qualifiers. If you're looking for big bass and have the large-ish outer ear canals to fit them, the CKS99 is a pretty good choice for the price, even the higher than $99 retail price. If you're looking for a more rounded experience, that's what the RE-400 is for. The strength of the low end and the strong midbass emphasis may be a turn off for some audiophiles but the sound signature is more or less in line with Audio-Technica's "house sound" and is warm and pleasant across a number of genres and I found them surprisingly enjoyable for Jazz. On the whole, if you're looking for an earphone with big bass between $100 and $150, the CKS99 is a very solid choice.
First off, I'd like to thank the folks at Audio-Technica for providing a review sample of the CKS99.
Up for review is the mid-range entry into the Solid Bass line of in ear monitors from Audio-Technica, the CKS99. So, without further ado, let's get right to it, shall we?
Accessories: The CKS99 comes with four pairs of silicone eartips, a set of manuals and a leather carrying case.
Design and Build Quality: The housings of the CKS99 are plastic and similar to the CKS77 but feature a few nicer accents to differentiate it from the lower end model. Overall, the earphones seem nicely built with sturdy cables and black plastic housings with a soft touch feel to them around the edges where the housings come into contact with your outer ear.
Comfort: Like the CKS77, the fit of the CKS99 could be a point of contention for some but I was once again very pleased with the fit of the CKS99 as it was quite comfortable for me over long periods. The driver sat in my outer ear nicely without exerting any unpleasant pressure.
Isolation: These isolate very well for a vented dynamic IEM.
Microphonics: A tad unpleasant at times but nothing excessive.
Sound Quality
Burn in: The CKS99 was given 50+ hours of burn in time prior to review and no significant changes were detected.
Like the CKS77, the CKS99 features prominent bass, a clear but recessed midrange and prominent treble. To go into further detail on the sound signature and the ways in which it improves over its sibling, let's start at the bottom.
The bass is big and full with slightly more emphasis on the midbass than sub bass and merely okay extension. If there's a lot of midbass emphasis on a track, the midbass hump will become incredibly obvious and distracting. Like the CKS77, the bass has a tendency to step up on the lower midrange which can end up sounding rather "thick" as a result.
The midrange retains some of the "hollow" character from the CKS77 but is surprisingly forward in presentation. Instruments sometimes sound a bit recessed but vocals are front and center. The midrange as a whole is actually rather smooth and detailed. Claritiy is good and the presentation is reasonably linear. In terms of pure detail, the CKS99 is ahead of its sibling but not quite on the level of the RE-400.
Treble is a bit less even and the lower treble is occasionally prone to sibilance but on the whole, the airiness of the treble combined with its good presence and great extension make it rather pleasant on the whole.
Presentation wise, the CKS99 eschews a bit of the claustrophobic spaciousness that I noticed on the CKS77 and sounds just as open but even more intimate, with vocals being very forward in the presentation. This sounds rather odd, considering the slightly recessed nature of the midrange but there it is. Along with the big bass, vocals do a great job of standing out and being heard.
Conclusion
Now this is where things get interesting. The CKS99 retails for $150 while the CKS77 retails for $120. However, I've found the CKS99 for $93 and the CKS77 for $99. If you're in the market for either one, the CKS99 is easily the better pick.
Like the CKS77, however, the CKS99 also comes with some qualifiers. If you're looking for big bass and have the large-ish outer ear canals to fit them, the CKS99 is a pretty good choice for the price, even the higher than $99 retail price. If you're looking for a more rounded experience, that's what the RE-400 is for. The strength of the low end and the strong midbass emphasis may be a turn off for some audiophiles but the sound signature is more or less in line with Audio-Technica's "house sound" and is warm and pleasant across a number of genres and I found them surprisingly enjoyable for Jazz. On the whole, if you're looking for an earphone with big bass between $100 and $150, the CKS99 is a very solid choice.
Скроменый эксперт
01.06.2016
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Значение для денег
Пункт звучит очень хорошо. Ясные, четкие, нейтральный звук. Я также аудио техника АТН M40X. Кабели немного хлипкой, в противном случае хорошее качество сборки. Дополнительный катушечный держать наушники-это очень приятный жест.
Скроменый эксперт
02.11.2015
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I will begin by stating that these are my my first $25+ headphones that I have purchased.
The build quality on these is decent. They do feel cheap for the most part but they never broke on me. The cables do feel fragile.
The sound is actually great when using an equalizer. With the equalizer, you can get quite a lot of bass from these headphones. The bass is great on these, it doesn't overpower the rest of the music but it was enough for me, as a minor bass head. The mids and highs sound good as well.
I am returning this product mainly due to their comfort. I use them while doing homework and they do start making my ears feel pain after wearing them for an hour. They also don't isolate sound very well. You can hear everything around you unless you turn the volume up almost to max.
I would recommend these headphones if you love bass and won't be listening to these for hours at a time. They have great sound and if they were more comfortable and had better build quality I really could see myself using them for a long time.
The build quality on these is decent. They do feel cheap for the most part but they never broke on me. The cables do feel fragile.
The sound is actually great when using an equalizer. With the equalizer, you can get quite a lot of bass from these headphones. The bass is great on these, it doesn't overpower the rest of the music but it was enough for me, as a minor bass head. The mids and highs sound good as well.
I am returning this product mainly due to their comfort. I use them while doing homework and they do start making my ears feel pain after wearing them for an hour. They also don't isolate sound very well. You can hear everything around you unless you turn the volume up almost to max.
I would recommend these headphones if you love bass and won't be listening to these for hours at a time. They have great sound and if they were more comfortable and had better build quality I really could see myself using them for a long time.
Скроменый эксперт
04.08.2015
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I'll compare these to my Sennheiser HD600s and Skull Candy Crushers (another fun bass headphone)
I'll start with what makes it a 4 instead of a 5. Hurts the ears after an hour or two, really made for smaller Japanese heads, my friend who always complains about in ears being too big for his little ears said they fit over his ears perfectly (he's 5'2") Some headphones make everything that I play through them sound good. However, spotify streaming songs really come through poorly, even at 320 high quality streaming. The Sennheiser HD600 makes spotify sound brilliant, with the skull candy's everything sounds fun with the bass.
Where these headphones shine is really high quality mids and highs for a bass headphone, something that the skull candy crushers cant even begin to compete with. The bass isn't crazy, but it's good for bassheads like me who listen to EDM and are disappointed in the neutral approach, non sub bass shaking way that sennheiser treats it.
All the music that I have downloaded sounds great.
A great headphone, love the bass response, and the mids and highs are extrememly crisp for a bass headphone. A good purchase overall.
. The leather/faux leather whatever ear pads have gotten better since I've started wearing them, but the sort of tight fit is a little rough
I'll start with what makes it a 4 instead of a 5. Hurts the ears after an hour or two, really made for smaller Japanese heads, my friend who always complains about in ears being too big for his little ears said they fit over his ears perfectly (he's 5'2") Some headphones make everything that I play through them sound good. However, spotify streaming songs really come through poorly, even at 320 high quality streaming. The Sennheiser HD600 makes spotify sound brilliant, with the skull candy's everything sounds fun with the bass.
Where these headphones shine is really high quality mids and highs for a bass headphone, something that the skull candy crushers cant even begin to compete with. The bass isn't crazy, but it's good for bassheads like me who listen to EDM and are disappointed in the neutral approach, non sub bass shaking way that sennheiser treats it.
All the music that I have downloaded sounds great.
A great headphone, love the bass response, and the mids and highs are extrememly crisp for a bass headphone. A good purchase overall.
. The leather/faux leather whatever ear pads have gotten better since I've started wearing them, but the sort of tight fit is a little rough
Скроменый эксперт
01.10.2015
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Яркий и удивительный качество в-ухо-монитор
Доставка: я всесильный, я заказал в 7:30 вечера, и я получил это отправление в 3:30 вечера следующего дня. Выдающиеся администрации! Или мне просто повезло!<БР />
производство: отличный продукт, если вы не смотрите на расходы для потрясающего звучания аудио-техника АТН-CKX 9is должен быть один! Я много-о-научные исследования и проанализировал десятки в-ухо монитор около месяца, чтобы сузить для аудио-техника, точного воспроизведения звуков, ассортимент хороший, не мутный, не более-лечить бас, ручки эквалайзеров хорошо, дает высокие частоты, средние и низкие частоты его собственного пространства.<бр /><бр />провести хорошо
производство: отличный продукт, если вы не смотрите на расходы для потрясающего звучания аудио-техника АТН-CKX 9is должен быть один! Я много-о-научные исследования и проанализировал десятки в-ухо монитор около месяца, чтобы сузить для аудио-техника, точного воспроизведения звуков, ассортимент хороший, не мутный, не более-лечить бас, ручки эквалайзеров хорошо, дает высокие частоты, средние и низкие частоты его собственного пространства.<бр /><бр />провести хорошо
Скроменый эксперт
01.03.2016
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Great while it worked, but that did not last long. Right ear stopped working for no reason, something must have been loose because taking it off and putting it back on made it work again. That was the first time it stopped working, second time now and the audio is not coming back on it's own. Terrible quality control for something of this price, I have had 25 dollar headphones actually hold up to stress not just go on their own.
Скроменый эксперт
12.09.2015
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I bought there earphones for comfort. I have been fond of headphones all my life. Sennheiser have been unbeaten for a long time. I use the Senheiser 598 to connect to the MacAir either by music of movies. I like earphones for travel that may give a nice balance between the voices, the middle frequencies and the bass. I tried the famous ATH IM02 (a friend as recomend them to me) they are also nice but they lack, somehow, the dose of bass that I love in jazz, rock, folk-rock. The voices in this last one are sometimes a little strident the middle range too thin. In jazz - I am listening to Cécile Savant record now - Cécile's voice is really in the centre of the soundstage, the piano on the left, the bass on the right and the drum a little behind. The timbre of the piano is absolutely amazing and the overall presentation is luxurious. They are light and very comfortable. Of course I haven't listen them for all a day. I do recommend them without hesitation.
Скроменый эксперт
25.08.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I bought these in Tokyo Japan in hopes of finding something worth more than its price.
I literally spent about three hours roaming the earphone section of Yodobashi Camera in Akihabara Tokyo.
If you have been there, then you would know that this is an entire building of about 6 floors dedicated to all electronics, and virtually an entire floor dedicated to solely audio equipment and earphone type products. They hold basically every brand and every model that exists (at least to my knowledge).
I was there for hours plugging in my iphone to every single model of earbud type earphones playing the same song over and over and finally decided on this. The CKS1000 was much more expensive but the bass in my opinion was an overkill. Other brands like Bose, Shure, Beats, etc. were good but this was the one with the balance, comfort, and quality. Luckily in Japan they sold these cheaper than here in the USA and got them for about 7000yen (which translates I think to roughly somewhere between $65-75 USD).
I would give them a try. I had a pair of very expensive Shure ear phones (which i don't recall the model name but remember paying $150 for them) before but I prefer these much more. Sound quality in my opinion is more about the balance between quality and comfort and accessibility in my personal opinion. The Shures' were nice but too much "boost" in the lower bass spectrums, and the hardware was uncomfortable. The middle ring on this pair of CKS99i is meant to fit into your ear as a way to secure inside your ear anatomically and ends up being very comfortable.
The only thing that I worry about is the fact that like all earphones (or most) the rubber of the chord will eventually rip and expose the wiring which will result in failure of performance. This has not happened yet, but from the looks of it, it doesn't seem to be built physically too much different integrally and materially than many other earphones I've had with this problem. So fingers crossed that the rubber material and design will hold up to the actual electronic hardware.
Anyway, the bottom line is, I recommend this product. At least as a person who has gone through many earphones in my life I personally enjoy these and have been and will continue to use them daily.
I literally spent about three hours roaming the earphone section of Yodobashi Camera in Akihabara Tokyo.
If you have been there, then you would know that this is an entire building of about 6 floors dedicated to all electronics, and virtually an entire floor dedicated to solely audio equipment and earphone type products. They hold basically every brand and every model that exists (at least to my knowledge).
I was there for hours plugging in my iphone to every single model of earbud type earphones playing the same song over and over and finally decided on this. The CKS1000 was much more expensive but the bass in my opinion was an overkill. Other brands like Bose, Shure, Beats, etc. were good but this was the one with the balance, comfort, and quality. Luckily in Japan they sold these cheaper than here in the USA and got them for about 7000yen (which translates I think to roughly somewhere between $65-75 USD).
I would give them a try. I had a pair of very expensive Shure ear phones (which i don't recall the model name but remember paying $150 for them) before but I prefer these much more. Sound quality in my opinion is more about the balance between quality and comfort and accessibility in my personal opinion. The Shures' were nice but too much "boost" in the lower bass spectrums, and the hardware was uncomfortable. The middle ring on this pair of CKS99i is meant to fit into your ear as a way to secure inside your ear anatomically and ends up being very comfortable.
The only thing that I worry about is the fact that like all earphones (or most) the rubber of the chord will eventually rip and expose the wiring which will result in failure of performance. This has not happened yet, but from the looks of it, it doesn't seem to be built physically too much different integrally and materially than many other earphones I've had with this problem. So fingers crossed that the rubber material and design will hold up to the actual electronic hardware.
Anyway, the bottom line is, I recommend this product. At least as a person who has gone through many earphones in my life I personally enjoy these and have been and will continue to use them daily.
Скроменый эксперт
01.01.2016
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Спасибо Amazon для аудио Technica в
Удивительные головные телефоны, очень премиум. Этот бренд является одним из 10 десятку лучших наушников в мире и не может быть по сравнению с любой другой.
и немного наушники выглядят большой и выходит из уха, пока включена в сеть.
по качеству звука все нормально.
и немного наушники выглядят большой и выходит из уха, пока включена в сеть.
по качеству звука все нормально.
Скроменый эксперт
09.12.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I had the Audio-Technica ATH-CKS55 in-ear model for a long time. The problem I found with those headphones is that they broke fairly easily. I workout everyday on an ergometer so the headphones see constant sweat and motion while in my ears. I would like to lie and say they stay put in my ears, but they really do not. I have to adjust them every so often because they slip out of my ears. That being said, I am still giving this headset five stars. It is unrealistic to expect any set of headphones to stay put in your ears, so I expect some looseness in that regard.
However, the audio quality of these headphones entirely makes up for any slippage during workouts. The audio quality of these headphones is a problem - a problem for this reason: once you listen to these headphones, every other set of in ear headphones sounds horrendous. It makes gaming, listening to EDM and other "high-impact" audio activities very engaging. The audio quality of these headphones literally BLOWS away any competition, especially given the price. I've tried many sets of in-ear headphones (Klipsch, Bose, Beats) and these are by far the best set ever. Listening to audio through this headset is immersive, and you can hear every detail of the songs.
Now I'll be honest. I'm not an audiophile, I have no interest in these headphones for their minute technical advantages. I wanted a pair of headphones that makes the music come alive in my ears, and these headphones accomplish that. I've bought over three pairs of the CKS55's and I have absolutely no intention of migrating away from this form of headset anytime soon.
TLDR: Amazing audio quality, immersive sound, but don't expect to do karate with these headphones and still have them in your ears after you are done.
However, the audio quality of these headphones entirely makes up for any slippage during workouts. The audio quality of these headphones is a problem - a problem for this reason: once you listen to these headphones, every other set of in ear headphones sounds horrendous. It makes gaming, listening to EDM and other "high-impact" audio activities very engaging. The audio quality of these headphones literally BLOWS away any competition, especially given the price. I've tried many sets of in-ear headphones (Klipsch, Bose, Beats) and these are by far the best set ever. Listening to audio through this headset is immersive, and you can hear every detail of the songs.
Now I'll be honest. I'm not an audiophile, I have no interest in these headphones for their minute technical advantages. I wanted a pair of headphones that makes the music come alive in my ears, and these headphones accomplish that. I've bought over three pairs of the CKS55's and I have absolutely no intention of migrating away from this form of headset anytime soon.
TLDR: Amazing audio quality, immersive sound, but don't expect to do karate with these headphones and still have them in your ears after you are done.
Скроменый эксперт
07.01.2016
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Very good headphones. Very good sound quality, comparable to the MTX-50s (which I also own) but with more bass.
Overall for pure sound i would pick the MTX-50s, unless I'm listening to more bassy music (like faithless for example).
But these headphones feel much smaller and look much better for walking around town than the MTX50s.
Overall for pure sound i would pick the MTX-50s, unless I'm listening to more bassy music (like faithless for example).
But these headphones feel much smaller and look much better for walking around town than the MTX50s.
Скроменый эксперт
09.03.2016
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
What I wanted. Can listen to music and other TVs channels in same room as my wife now. Good quality and quick to arrive. Nuff said.
Скроменый эксперт
01.01.2016
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Правильный звук и подходят
Отличное качество звука. Хорошо вписывается и осталась во время работы. Пультом дистанционного управления и микрофоном работает хорошо. Желаю, чтобы они сделали пот доказательство
Скроменый эксперт
05.01.2016
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Only negative is that they get uncomfortable after an hour or so..can't really say anything negative about the sound quality..these headphones don't even need to be amped. they sound good straight out of a laptops heaphone out..if these headphones loosen up a bit over time they will get an extra star from me!
Скроменый эксперт
23.08.2015
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
There are superb headphones for the cost, and I have had much more expensive Beyerdynamics. The bass is not overpowering, but of course they ARE tuned for bass, so this really is a perfect balance for people who don't get enough base with standard phones. They are comfortable and the materials seem strong, although the plastic outers are a *little* less than solid-feeling. I use these for every genre, and they really excel with hip-hop and r&b. Good, balanced sound, with great bass definition, especially for the cost. Best value around, IMO. (I bought 5 different pairs for a comparison and these were the best.) I suggest splurging, as the cheaper ones were well below these in bass output and overall clarity. Seems like AT is really coming along.
Скроменый эксперт
01.01.2016
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Not as great quality as I expected, feels quite flimsy. No noise cancellation means people can hear what I'm listening to if my music is loud. Still decent sound quality but in comparison to Sony or Beats, not as good
Скроменый эксперт
29.01.2016
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
after having them on for more than 3 hours I could say that they are not most comfortable
sound quality is good
sound quality is good
Показаны отзывы 1273-1296 из 1435.
