Отзывы о Наушники Audio-Technica ATH-M20X
1457 отзывов пользователей o Audio-Technica ATH-M20X
Пользовались
Audio-Technica ATH-M20X?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Лунатик-2KDTG
09.01.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Непожалел что купил на самом деле,басов в наушниках хватает с лихвой,хотелось бы может маленечко добавить кристализации,но всё таки эквалайзер ещё никто не отменял,до них были Сенхи сх-280,цена впринципе таже,но звук совсем другой,в сенхах чуть более прозрачные "высокие",а вот басов не хватало если честно...но вот взял АУДИО ТЕХНИКУ и просто снимать не хочеться.Слушаю только электронную музыку.Рок тоже пробовал-играют на ура.Вывод:для капелек звук очень близок к идеальному.Здесь продаються капельки и за 7000 руб,но я думаю смысла нет их брать-звук конечно может быть в них и лучше,но вот цена...за капали я думаю так нестоит переплачивать.
Альфа-Юнит-3MKNX
17.11.2019
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Звук.
Нет, не так.
ЗВУК!!!
Я не аудиофил, но музыку слушаю много и часто (За последние 15 лет перепробовал разные наушники, нижних и средних ценовых диапазонов, не решался покупать серьёзные "уши" из-за того, что сам толком не знал, что хочу от них, ну и цена, конечно не особо вдохновляла.
Года два назад "созрел", и после теста нескольких младших моделей этой марки и данной гарнитуры, остановился на последней, хоть и цена отличалась весьма значительно. Причины: звук ощутимо приятнее, сборка - более конкретная (о недостатках - ниже), у младших смутил тоненький, хлипкий на вид провод, подводка его к чашкам как у бюджетных, хотя это субъективно все; плюс система крепления на голове чуднАя, но комфортная, эти штуки как то так рассчитаны, что они и не давят и не сползают, ухи от них не устают даже после нескольких часов, хотя вряд-ли это полезно чего уж там)
Пишут что скрипят (вон Технокухня, говоря про эту гарнитуру только это и упомянула, ни сказав ни слова ни о качестве звука ни о других недостатках), может когда одеваешь - чуть поскрипывают, но когда на голове - все отлично, ничего не скрипит, никаких винтиков не болтается внутри, сидят мягко и приятно. - - Регулятор звука на проводе! Блин, премиальный продукт, и такой косяк. Читаю тут отзывы, и офигеваю от его массовости, у кого-то то есть, то нет звука. У меня же, когда крутишь колесико, то звук как то в каждой чашке попеременно меняется , т.е., чет типа "шрх - справа чуть громче стало, шрх - слева, шрх - вроде в обеих одинаково, шрх - чет слева вроде громче..." и когда до конца вверх выкручиваешь - то вроде как в обоих одинаково.. заметил это в течение месяца после покупки, но плюнул, ибо связываться с гарантийной эпопеей чет не особо хотелось, косяк не особо критичен, и звук так хорош, очень не хотелось возвращаться к старым "ушам".
Спустя года полтора начала сыпаться "псевдокожа" на амбушюрах, но это поди у всех так, где эта псевдокожа есть
Еще хотелось бы удлиннительный кабель такой же толщины, как и основной...
Пульсар-3AOJW
29.10.2020
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Во первых - звук. Это просто что-то с чем то. После дефолтных айфоновских ушей - космос. И музыка и звук в играх. Ваакум, если ставишь 50+ громкость не слышишь звонка мобильного, лежащего на кровате. Длинна провода и его удлинение
- - Правое оголовье начало поскрипывать после 3 месяцев использования, калибровка звука на наушниках слишком резкая, думал внешняя аудио карта исправит этот косяк - но оказалось...
Астрономад-9HNAK
04.11.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Шикарные наушники,не разу не пожалел,что приобрел.Поиски были долгими,но остановился именно на них.Такой звук надо поискать!Настоящий Hi-end. Ценители настоящего звука оценят.От меня личные рекомендации.Звук воздушный,просто надеваешь их и забываешь обо всем.Низа не давят,все в меру,верха кристально чистые.Могу сказать,что мне эти ушки понравились больше Сенхайзеров HD-800.
Астрономад-1XQUV
25.03.2021
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Посредсвенная модель
- + + звук, неплохой, но и не вау
+ скошенные динамики, соответственно не давят на уши
+ микрофон выше среднего, но не отличный - - - из коробки один из динамиков тише (где-то на 1 Дб), при шевелении и надавливании на колёсико громкости можно случайно вывести в одинаковый уровень
- основной кабель от ушей так и не распрямился полностью
- регулятор громкости на кабеле, который работает неадекватно
- переходник-удлинитель на котором очевидно сэкономили, сам по себе отливается от основного, так еще и гнездо на нём через пару месяцев сдохло спаял напрямую)...
Небулоид-6HAKY
03.02.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + 1. Отличный звук, что в играх, что при прослушивании музыки в форматах flac и aac.
2. Очень достойный микрофон с шумоподавлением на твердую 5. Оценили собеседники в Discord и TeamSpeak.
3. Подключение: 2 x mini jack 3.5 mm (подключены к Creative Sound BlasterX G6)
4. Мягкие амбушюры.
5. Очень удобное крепление оголовья, прям шикарное! (размер черепа...
Лунатик-0OGXP
05.02.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Отзывов много на яндекс-маркете. Цитата с сайта "особый дизайн гарантирует комфортное ношение в течение многих часов подряд" пустая реклама. Покупал для просмотра фильмов, полтора часа не снимая в них не просидеть - потеют уши. Но это наверное у многих так.Еще "система посадки для минимизации давления наушников на голову" не идеальна. Голова у меня не большая но наушники ощутимы.Качество звука вполне устраивает, хотя это низшая модель из линейки "Домашние".
Странник-8LWXV
25.11.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Великолепные наушники, с превосходным звучанием!!!
НаноПилигрим-0KVLP
07.10.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Дополню что белые и серебристые собираются в Тайване, тогда как красные и черные в Китае.
Кронос-4EIAJ
26.03.2021
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + Полноразмерные проводные открытые динамические наушники с велюровыми амбюшурами и саморегулируемым оголовьем с весом всего 270 граммов. Это при излучателе в 53 мм. и огромных чашках приятного дизайна. Диапазон частот : 5 - 40 000 Гц весьма впечатляет , да и другие параметры тоже ... Импеданс в 40 Ом подойдёт и для портативного использования даже со смартфонами , хотя всё же лучше хороший плеер с токовым усилением для полноценного раскрытия потенциала и возможностей модели. Прогрев до 100 часов тоже повлияет на качество отдачи , хотя и не принципиально . Здесь действительно полноценное и широкое по сцене звучание , конечно при условии качественных записей как по формату , так и по исходнику и проработке . Детализация и сцена и разрешение и проработка и частотная отдача на высоте , может не всем и не всегда хватит глубины и массы низких частот, однако модель ещё и открытого типа - потому контент для выслушивания подбираем соответственно, средние и высокие выдаются упоительно. ... Модель оная более именно для дома или офиса , да и кабель в 3 метра на то намекает , велюровые амбюшуры крайне удобны если не лето и не жара . Да и источник и усилитель должны быть уже качественными . При долгом прослушивании не давят и не утомляют , несмотря на размеры , да и качество материалов на высоте . А открытая конструкция позволяет порою услышать и важное из окружающих сигналов и звуков . Ещё по опыту : не снимая наушники, а лишь выключив плеер , можно говорить по телефону, приставив его ближе к чашке ( сам удивился ! ) . В целом, по дизайну и звуку получилась крайне выдающаяся модель за свою цену , ибо аналоги в десятки раз дороже играют лишь на несколько процентов лучше, так что без сравнения рядом и не отличишь .... Одно из самых приятных и важных достоинств данной модели - чисто японская сборка ! Так что действительно одна из любимых моделей , несмотря на специфику подачи и открытый конструктив . 🎧🎵🎶🎼📀
- - Несьёмный толстенный кабель в 3 метра длиной с прямым коннектором , хотя и не большим...
НоваГость-2HCMT
10.01.2025
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + максимально комфортно работать
быстрый коннект по Bluetooth
приятный звук по шнуру и BT - - шнур из комплекта короткий (но это вопрос к производителю)
Гиперион-4SIPQ
13.01.2025
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Отличная модель
- + звук отличный
- - нет шумоподавления
ТехноНаблюдатель-3KUJJ
28.12.2022
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Очень плохая модель
- + отличный звук. мягкие. удобные.
- - так один раз по гарантии уже отвозил. через месяц пользования. так через год снова в...
Синтрон-6AORJ
22.01.2025
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Хорошая модель
- + не устают уши, большие амбушюры
- - хлипенькие
Гравитон-6EFUZ
17.05.2021
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
Очень плохая модель
- + Отличный звук, удобно сидят на голове, два провода.
- - Через пару месяцев появился странный скрип в правом...
НаноПилигрим-6FJPW
04.12.2015
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Preface: For those of you that have followed my headphone reviews know that I have an affinity for headphones and good quality audio; I collect different types of headphones for different types of listening. My bass head headphones are when I want to feel the bass, my more analytical/balanced headphones are for when I just want to relax and listen to more easy going music. Well 6 months ago I found a unique headphone that can not only bring the bass when it's called for, but can also give me a fairly balanced sound for my more relaxing music - the Audio Technica ATH-WS99. Now that I have prefaced my review, let's get to it.
Packaging and accessories: Packaging is as Plain Jane as it gets, I was not really impressed with the packaging at all considering these headphones used to retail for $250 at one point in time. For the $124 I paid I suppose the packaging is simply okay. Inside the packaging was a manual, 2 extension cables (one with a mic and a volume slider), one 1/4 inch adapter, and of course the headphones themselves with a dual input non-detachable 1 foot cable. I am not a fan of the short non-detachable cable affixed to the headphones because you will essentially need one of the extension cables to even think about using the headphones at all. The fact that the cable doesn't detach from the headphone at all is borderline unacceptable mostly due to the cable being only a foot long and if you misplace the extension cables and you don't have any spares on you, you cannot use the headphones at all with a portable or a home audio setup without sacrificing A LOT of free range movement. On a brighter note - the extension cables are of good quality and are durable enough. It's a good thing these headphones don't retail for 250 dollars anymore because the packaging and accessories alone are comically inadequate for such an exorbitant price tag. Packaging gets a 4.5/10 and accessories get a 4/10.
Build quality: I am not that impressed with the build quality. The overall look of the headphone is nice and sleek with a mature look. Adults of all ages can wear this headphone and not look like an obnoxious teen wearing a pair of celebrity headphones, you will look like a mature adult with a tasteful looking pair of headphones on your head. The overall build quality of the WS99 is below average. Lots of below average quality plastic that does tend to creak after a brief period of ownership. The aluminum outer ear cups are nice to look at and should be durable enough to last a while. The headband does not have much padding at all but that may not be so much of a bad thing considering the WS99 is a lightweight headphone. The ear cushions themselves are soft and are of a decent pleather material. A more premium pleather for the ear cushions would have been appreciated, but they are decent enough. I do not expect these headphones to hold up for more than 3 years. 4.5/10
Comfort: I find the WS99 to be quite comfortable due to its lightweight and decently soft ear cushions. I have worn the WS99 for up to 5 hours with little to no discomfort. The comfort does make up for the somewhat shoddy build quality of the WS99. 8/10.
Isolation: Isolation is just fairly poor on the WS99. I prefer to use the WS99 at home. Using the WS99 as a portable headphone is out of the question for me - the isolation simply put is not good enough for me. I think I'll stick to my IEMs for portable listening. 5/10
Now I know I have been quite critical of the WS99 thus far and for good reason. But the sound quality does turn things around in favor of the overall scoring for the WS99. I will nwo review the sound quality.
Treble: The treble is nicely detailed with a good sparkle. Not too bright, not too rolled off. It's just right for a nice and easy listening session. 7.5/10.
Mid range: The mid range much like the treble is nicely detailed and pleasant to listen to. While the mid range is a bit recessed it still makes its presence known, especially with non bass heavy music. Vocals sound nice and clear. Instruments sound a tad distant and recessed in the overall mix. The mid range is still impressive for a headphone in the solid bass category. 7/10.
Sound stage: The sound stage is pretty good. It has a fair amount of width and an okay amount of depth. Panning can be a little hard to make out at times, but the overall sound stage is still enjoyable. 7.5/10
Bass: The bass is solid for sure. Not boomy or muddy at all. It doesn't drown out the mids like most bass heavy headphones do. The bass goes well with the treble and the mid range. The bass is well textured. Mid bass and sub bass are well integrated with good articulation, which is good for all genres of music since the bass only comes out when the music demands it, which puts the WS99 in a league of its own when compared to other bass-y headphones. I am very impressed with the bass, it is one of the
Packaging and accessories: Packaging is as Plain Jane as it gets, I was not really impressed with the packaging at all considering these headphones used to retail for $250 at one point in time. For the $124 I paid I suppose the packaging is simply okay. Inside the packaging was a manual, 2 extension cables (one with a mic and a volume slider), one 1/4 inch adapter, and of course the headphones themselves with a dual input non-detachable 1 foot cable. I am not a fan of the short non-detachable cable affixed to the headphones because you will essentially need one of the extension cables to even think about using the headphones at all. The fact that the cable doesn't detach from the headphone at all is borderline unacceptable mostly due to the cable being only a foot long and if you misplace the extension cables and you don't have any spares on you, you cannot use the headphones at all with a portable or a home audio setup without sacrificing A LOT of free range movement. On a brighter note - the extension cables are of good quality and are durable enough. It's a good thing these headphones don't retail for 250 dollars anymore because the packaging and accessories alone are comically inadequate for such an exorbitant price tag. Packaging gets a 4.5/10 and accessories get a 4/10.
Build quality: I am not that impressed with the build quality. The overall look of the headphone is nice and sleek with a mature look. Adults of all ages can wear this headphone and not look like an obnoxious teen wearing a pair of celebrity headphones, you will look like a mature adult with a tasteful looking pair of headphones on your head. The overall build quality of the WS99 is below average. Lots of below average quality plastic that does tend to creak after a brief period of ownership. The aluminum outer ear cups are nice to look at and should be durable enough to last a while. The headband does not have much padding at all but that may not be so much of a bad thing considering the WS99 is a lightweight headphone. The ear cushions themselves are soft and are of a decent pleather material. A more premium pleather for the ear cushions would have been appreciated, but they are decent enough. I do not expect these headphones to hold up for more than 3 years. 4.5/10
Comfort: I find the WS99 to be quite comfortable due to its lightweight and decently soft ear cushions. I have worn the WS99 for up to 5 hours with little to no discomfort. The comfort does make up for the somewhat shoddy build quality of the WS99. 8/10.
Isolation: Isolation is just fairly poor on the WS99. I prefer to use the WS99 at home. Using the WS99 as a portable headphone is out of the question for me - the isolation simply put is not good enough for me. I think I'll stick to my IEMs for portable listening. 5/10
Now I know I have been quite critical of the WS99 thus far and for good reason. But the sound quality does turn things around in favor of the overall scoring for the WS99. I will nwo review the sound quality.
Treble: The treble is nicely detailed with a good sparkle. Not too bright, not too rolled off. It's just right for a nice and easy listening session. 7.5/10.
Mid range: The mid range much like the treble is nicely detailed and pleasant to listen to. While the mid range is a bit recessed it still makes its presence known, especially with non bass heavy music. Vocals sound nice and clear. Instruments sound a tad distant and recessed in the overall mix. The mid range is still impressive for a headphone in the solid bass category. 7/10.
Sound stage: The sound stage is pretty good. It has a fair amount of width and an okay amount of depth. Panning can be a little hard to make out at times, but the overall sound stage is still enjoyable. 7.5/10
Bass: The bass is solid for sure. Not boomy or muddy at all. It doesn't drown out the mids like most bass heavy headphones do. The bass goes well with the treble and the mid range. The bass is well textured. Mid bass and sub bass are well integrated with good articulation, which is good for all genres of music since the bass only comes out when the music demands it, which puts the WS99 in a league of its own when compared to other bass-y headphones. I am very impressed with the bass, it is one of the
Сатурниан-1KUZJ
14.12.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
So what is so special about these CKR9/CKR10 models? Introduced earlier this year, Audio-Technica presented them as a first IEM with a dual phase push-pull drivers configuration. It's quite an interesting concept where instead of a traditional config with both drivers facing the same direction toward the nozzle of headphones, these 13mm drivers are facing each other while being wired out of phase. There is some science behind this design which in the past was only implemented in full size speakers to reduce harmonic distortion and unwanted vibration. Here, it was scaled down to IEM size with quite an impressive results delivering high resolution sound.
Starting with a packaging, both CKR9 and CKR10 outer sleeve greets your with a high res picture of these little beauties with a distinguished detail of Aluminum silver-color theme of CKR9 and Titanium gold-color theme of CKR10. On the back you have a lot info in both Japanese and English with a list of features, specs, and the close up of the internal drivers config. One thing is to read the description, but it's a whole different experience to see the actual detailed assembly of the drivers. It also shows how much pride AT takes in their product showcasing their design, similar to what I found with their IM0x IEMs. After sliding out the sleeve and removing the top cover, both CKR9 and CRK10 models have the same display presentation and identical accessories with IEMs inside of the foam cutout, a premium leather case in the lower left corner, and a set of eartips in the lower right corner.
Starting with a plug, you have a very sturdy 90deg hard plastic housing and gold-plated connector with an excellent strain relief and enough extension to fit any audio player or heavy duty phone case. The only difference here is a slim metal ring detail on the plug of CKR10 to distinguish its premium appeal. Moving to the cable you have a soft rubber shielding which is a bit sticky and unfortunately prone to some tangling. The cable design is partitioned in a way where you have a left/right wires from each earpiece with signal/ground going all the way down to 3.5mm connector keeping the ground wires of L/R sides separate. As a result, you have a very basic y-splitter clip separating individual wires from a dual attached one going to the plug. There is no chin slider which is not a show stopper since it's usually helpful for over-ear fitment, although it makes me wonder if chin slider would have been helpful to keep cables from moving to mitigate a considerable amount of microphonics introduced by the cable.
Moving up to earpieces, first thing you will notice is a high quality strain relief. Considering CKR9/10 don't have a removable cable, I was very pleased to see a well designed and attached soft rubber tube strain relief that was sturdy enough to be handled even while removing headphones from your ears. I found the shape of the shell to have a perfect size (not too big or too small) and an excellent fitment for my medium size ears, and we are talking about two rather large drivers enclosed in a metal housing surrounded by a plastic shell. To improve ergonomics of fitment, CKR models have a cable attached at the front rather than back allowing a more comfortable inner ear fitment. Together with an angled nozzle I found it to fit my ears like a glove, even before I started tip rolling. I guess there is a way you can try over-ear wiring, but the extension of strain relief will get in the way. Another thing worth mentioning, there is a slim port opening on the back which I assume actually functioning rather than for looks.
This brings me to the most important part of the review - the sound analysis. Unlike other AT headphones I tested in the past where incremental model number meant an additional driver or a more significant design change, I found CRK9/10 numbering to just distinguish two different sound signatures. Before starting my test, I was well aware these dynamic drivers require a burn in, thus I put them through at least 50+ hrs of play in free air for a proper conditioning. A quick note, right out of the box the bass was more exaggerated in both models, but afterwards it settled down nicely along with more refinement in high frequencies.
If you look at overall tonality of CKR9/CKR10, they both have a nicely balanced signature with a decent extension at both ends of the spectrum. But individually their sound tuning follows two different directions. Also, due to a brighter nature of CKR9 I was using their stock narrow bore tip to reduce some higher frequency peaks, while for CKR10 I switched to UE900 tips with a medium bore opening for an opposite effect to open up higher frequencies which also widened soundstage perception and made sound more natural.
With CKR9, it has a smooth analytical/neutral (a blend in between) sound which is on a brighter side. Starting with a low end, it has a well controlled
Starting with a packaging, both CKR9 and CKR10 outer sleeve greets your with a high res picture of these little beauties with a distinguished detail of Aluminum silver-color theme of CKR9 and Titanium gold-color theme of CKR10. On the back you have a lot info in both Japanese and English with a list of features, specs, and the close up of the internal drivers config. One thing is to read the description, but it's a whole different experience to see the actual detailed assembly of the drivers. It also shows how much pride AT takes in their product showcasing their design, similar to what I found with their IM0x IEMs. After sliding out the sleeve and removing the top cover, both CKR9 and CRK10 models have the same display presentation and identical accessories with IEMs inside of the foam cutout, a premium leather case in the lower left corner, and a set of eartips in the lower right corner.
Starting with a plug, you have a very sturdy 90deg hard plastic housing and gold-plated connector with an excellent strain relief and enough extension to fit any audio player or heavy duty phone case. The only difference here is a slim metal ring detail on the plug of CKR10 to distinguish its premium appeal. Moving to the cable you have a soft rubber shielding which is a bit sticky and unfortunately prone to some tangling. The cable design is partitioned in a way where you have a left/right wires from each earpiece with signal/ground going all the way down to 3.5mm connector keeping the ground wires of L/R sides separate. As a result, you have a very basic y-splitter clip separating individual wires from a dual attached one going to the plug. There is no chin slider which is not a show stopper since it's usually helpful for over-ear fitment, although it makes me wonder if chin slider would have been helpful to keep cables from moving to mitigate a considerable amount of microphonics introduced by the cable.
Moving up to earpieces, first thing you will notice is a high quality strain relief. Considering CKR9/10 don't have a removable cable, I was very pleased to see a well designed and attached soft rubber tube strain relief that was sturdy enough to be handled even while removing headphones from your ears. I found the shape of the shell to have a perfect size (not too big or too small) and an excellent fitment for my medium size ears, and we are talking about two rather large drivers enclosed in a metal housing surrounded by a plastic shell. To improve ergonomics of fitment, CKR models have a cable attached at the front rather than back allowing a more comfortable inner ear fitment. Together with an angled nozzle I found it to fit my ears like a glove, even before I started tip rolling. I guess there is a way you can try over-ear wiring, but the extension of strain relief will get in the way. Another thing worth mentioning, there is a slim port opening on the back which I assume actually functioning rather than for looks.
This brings me to the most important part of the review - the sound analysis. Unlike other AT headphones I tested in the past where incremental model number meant an additional driver or a more significant design change, I found CRK9/10 numbering to just distinguish two different sound signatures. Before starting my test, I was well aware these dynamic drivers require a burn in, thus I put them through at least 50+ hrs of play in free air for a proper conditioning. A quick note, right out of the box the bass was more exaggerated in both models, but afterwards it settled down nicely along with more refinement in high frequencies.
If you look at overall tonality of CKR9/CKR10, they both have a nicely balanced signature with a decent extension at both ends of the spectrum. But individually their sound tuning follows two different directions. Also, due to a brighter nature of CKR9 I was using their stock narrow bore tip to reduce some higher frequency peaks, while for CKR10 I switched to UE900 tips with a medium bore opening for an opposite effect to open up higher frequencies which also widened soundstage perception and made sound more natural.
With CKR9, it has a smooth analytical/neutral (a blend in between) sound which is on a brighter side. Starting with a low end, it has a well controlled
Плазмоид-8XCDA
29.12.2015
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I am an audio lover yet not an audiophile in where I want or have a need for super high end equipment. I am an typical user who uses headphones-earbuds for daily activities such as listening to movies on a laptop, listening to music from a laptop and listening to my phone with them.
I have used a ton of generic and some basic earbuds-phones such as OEM Samsung earbuds which come with the S5. In terms of headphones, I was using Sony MDRZX300 headphones. The Sony Headphones were light but not amazing in terms of quality by any means. I then decided to move up a little in budget and went with these and I can say I am done searching for headphones. These headphones lived up to all the amazing reviews and research I did before buying a replacement set.
Pros
The sound quality is simply perfect in my opinion. I want to hear a crisp, clear, full sound with a solid bass. (Not a distorted or overly emphasized bass.) The sound is exactly so. You get a very nice bass, but not one that will taint the other mids-highs or cause any distortion when listening. As others have stated, I can now hear a far greater amount of detail that was never present before and the depth is much greater as well.
-Headphone cushion on the head band is very nice and feels good. (I have a bald head so it was nice to have something padded up there.)
-The cord is just the right length and is a nice thickness. The 3.5mm is a nice right ankle with gold plating.
-The design allows a nominal amount of background through. (They are not noise cancelling.) I find the amount of audio it keeps out perfect. Enough for me to enjoy my music and detail, yet lets enough through I can hear my daughter or wife calling for me if they need something.
Notes - For those who have asked if they could benefit from an amplifier, I think this is a two tone question. All of my audio devices power these perfectly, however, I would have to say that since the quality is above standard and since it has such a nice range, you could certainly use one if you have the extra and take full advantage of the sound quality this product has the ability to make. (Some times the device you use will limit your ultimate sound quality and an amplifier may improve some devices sound.)
Now if only I can find an earbud set that provides an equal quality of sound!
Cons
-After use longer then 1/2 to 1hr my ears tend to be sore. (I believe the tension just ever so slightly more than I want.) While you can adjust overall fit, it would be nice for it to have some way to loosen the overall tension you have with the ear pads against the ears.
-Ear pads could be a little bigger. (While they are big, my ears are just ever so slightly larger. It would be nice to have an aftermarket selection of different size ear pads to change to for a more perfect fit for those with bigger or smaller ears.
-Has a double cord that is not detachable. (Not sure this counts as a con as you get what you pay for. Audio Technica makes products with this feature and you get what you pay for.
I have used a ton of generic and some basic earbuds-phones such as OEM Samsung earbuds which come with the S5. In terms of headphones, I was using Sony MDRZX300 headphones. The Sony Headphones were light but not amazing in terms of quality by any means. I then decided to move up a little in budget and went with these and I can say I am done searching for headphones. These headphones lived up to all the amazing reviews and research I did before buying a replacement set.
Pros
The sound quality is simply perfect in my opinion. I want to hear a crisp, clear, full sound with a solid bass. (Not a distorted or overly emphasized bass.) The sound is exactly so. You get a very nice bass, but not one that will taint the other mids-highs or cause any distortion when listening. As others have stated, I can now hear a far greater amount of detail that was never present before and the depth is much greater as well.
-Headphone cushion on the head band is very nice and feels good. (I have a bald head so it was nice to have something padded up there.)
-The cord is just the right length and is a nice thickness. The 3.5mm is a nice right ankle with gold plating.
-The design allows a nominal amount of background through. (They are not noise cancelling.) I find the amount of audio it keeps out perfect. Enough for me to enjoy my music and detail, yet lets enough through I can hear my daughter or wife calling for me if they need something.
Notes - For those who have asked if they could benefit from an amplifier, I think this is a two tone question. All of my audio devices power these perfectly, however, I would have to say that since the quality is above standard and since it has such a nice range, you could certainly use one if you have the extra and take full advantage of the sound quality this product has the ability to make. (Some times the device you use will limit your ultimate sound quality and an amplifier may improve some devices sound.)
Now if only I can find an earbud set that provides an equal quality of sound!
Cons
-After use longer then 1/2 to 1hr my ears tend to be sore. (I believe the tension just ever so slightly more than I want.) While you can adjust overall fit, it would be nice for it to have some way to loosen the overall tension you have with the ear pads against the ears.
-Ear pads could be a little bigger. (While they are big, my ears are just ever so slightly larger. It would be nice to have an aftermarket selection of different size ear pads to change to for a more perfect fit for those with bigger or smaller ears.
-Has a double cord that is not detachable. (Not sure this counts as a con as you get what you pay for. Audio Technica makes products with this feature and you get what you pay for.
ИнфраГость-6HHOO
18.07.2014
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I would say this is a basshead over hear, no doubt. Its very portable and light weight and very comfortable for longer periods; has beathable material on ears so as you do not get that suffocating sweat.
The mids are a little bit recessed and the highs do not really sparkle. These fit in the basshead/fun category of my headphones (WS99, UE6000, Ultrafocus 8000, HD598, HE400, M100, Kef M500, Fidelio L2). Others in that collection would be UE6000, Ultrafocus8000, and the M100. UE and M100 win on aesthetics, UE wins on comfort. I would say sound-wise and a close runner-up on all other important items with exception to comfort, would be the Ultrafocus 8000 by Polk. These WS99 vs UE6000, WS99 vs M100, and WS99 vs Ultrafocus 8000; the WS99 gets narrowly defeated on each battle.
Comfort:
1: WS99
2: UE6000
3: M100
4. Ultrafocus 8000
Aesthetics:
(most subjective for sure, the WS99 record look and feel on the earcups is very cool, but I feel the white UE6000's look most impressive)
Hit/Rumble of bass:
1. Ultrafocus 8000
2. M100
3. UE6000/WS99
Clarity of Mids (very difficult for a bass-head phone to pull of:
1. M100
2. Ultrafocus 8000
3. UE6000
4. WS99
Sparkle and crispness of highs:
1. M100 by far
2. Ultrafocus 8000
3. UE6000/WS99
For use on mobile phones:
1. Ultrafocus 8000; convenient controls on earcups and call clarity on receiving end receives the least complaints. NOTE: the Ultrafocus headphones do NOT fold up, which can be a big disadvantage for it, but it does come with a nice and flat hard case for it.
2. WS99; the reason this gets #2 and a VERY close to number one is that it has a nice microphone attached cable, but it has a very short cable coming from the top. This means its very handle to connect into a clip-on bluetooth device such as the Audio-technica AT-PHA05BT and have minimal wires to deal with. For bluetooth use, the M100 and UE6000 paired with a short 3.5mm to 3.5mm aux cable found on amazon for $5 works very well, however, and can be even LESS cables.
3. UE6000/M100
Accessories:
1. M100; revolutionary skeleton case, two cables, and all adapters
2. UE6000; case, adapters, two cables
3. Ultrafocus 8000; one flat cable, adapters, nice flat case
4. WS99; two cables, adapters
In all, this is a great headphone. I have compared them against other heavy-hitters, and there is going to be some amount of subjectivity to any headphone side-by-side or review. Any one of the aforementioned headphones would be worth a listen/try. In a perfect world, you could try all four of them somewhere in person, but you are stuck going off of what someone else says. But when I want a bass/sub bass that I can really feel, I continually am impressed with Polk's Ultrafocus 8000; which is only slightly more bassy than the Polk Buckle (another excellent competitor of these). I hate to take business away from any company, but in this case I have to be on the side of the consumer and tell you my experience having had the blessing of owning many different pairs. If you have other questions or comparisons to other headphones with this, I'd be happy to offer my two cents.
What would I say Ultrafocus 8000 vs M100?! Well, that's a battle of the best (bass head) right there. In my opinion, there isn't a very clear winner. As far as thundering bass goes, Ultrafocus 8000 actually WINS. But, when up against the rest of the sound spectrum, the M100 WINS. For a more clear and crisp sound, go for the M100. For a more warm sound, go for the Ulltrafocus 8000's. But, you know what, if you're a basshead, you really ought to save up for both.... If you're cost concious and can't afford either of those two, get the UE6000's; they are going rediculous cheap right now (7/17/14), and I recommend the white ones; you won't be disappointed.
The mids are a little bit recessed and the highs do not really sparkle. These fit in the basshead/fun category of my headphones (WS99, UE6000, Ultrafocus 8000, HD598, HE400, M100, Kef M500, Fidelio L2). Others in that collection would be UE6000, Ultrafocus8000, and the M100. UE and M100 win on aesthetics, UE wins on comfort. I would say sound-wise and a close runner-up on all other important items with exception to comfort, would be the Ultrafocus 8000 by Polk. These WS99 vs UE6000, WS99 vs M100, and WS99 vs Ultrafocus 8000; the WS99 gets narrowly defeated on each battle.
Comfort:
1: WS99
2: UE6000
3: M100
4. Ultrafocus 8000
Aesthetics:
(most subjective for sure, the WS99 record look and feel on the earcups is very cool, but I feel the white UE6000's look most impressive)
Hit/Rumble of bass:
1. Ultrafocus 8000
2. M100
3. UE6000/WS99
Clarity of Mids (very difficult for a bass-head phone to pull of:
1. M100
2. Ultrafocus 8000
3. UE6000
4. WS99
Sparkle and crispness of highs:
1. M100 by far
2. Ultrafocus 8000
3. UE6000/WS99
For use on mobile phones:
1. Ultrafocus 8000; convenient controls on earcups and call clarity on receiving end receives the least complaints. NOTE: the Ultrafocus headphones do NOT fold up, which can be a big disadvantage for it, but it does come with a nice and flat hard case for it.
2. WS99; the reason this gets #2 and a VERY close to number one is that it has a nice microphone attached cable, but it has a very short cable coming from the top. This means its very handle to connect into a clip-on bluetooth device such as the Audio-technica AT-PHA05BT and have minimal wires to deal with. For bluetooth use, the M100 and UE6000 paired with a short 3.5mm to 3.5mm aux cable found on amazon for $5 works very well, however, and can be even LESS cables.
3. UE6000/M100
Accessories:
1. M100; revolutionary skeleton case, two cables, and all adapters
2. UE6000; case, adapters, two cables
3. Ultrafocus 8000; one flat cable, adapters, nice flat case
4. WS99; two cables, adapters
In all, this is a great headphone. I have compared them against other heavy-hitters, and there is going to be some amount of subjectivity to any headphone side-by-side or review. Any one of the aforementioned headphones would be worth a listen/try. In a perfect world, you could try all four of them somewhere in person, but you are stuck going off of what someone else says. But when I want a bass/sub bass that I can really feel, I continually am impressed with Polk's Ultrafocus 8000; which is only slightly more bassy than the Polk Buckle (another excellent competitor of these). I hate to take business away from any company, but in this case I have to be on the side of the consumer and tell you my experience having had the blessing of owning many different pairs. If you have other questions or comparisons to other headphones with this, I'd be happy to offer my two cents.
What would I say Ultrafocus 8000 vs M100?! Well, that's a battle of the best (bass head) right there. In my opinion, there isn't a very clear winner. As far as thundering bass goes, Ultrafocus 8000 actually WINS. But, when up against the rest of the sound spectrum, the M100 WINS. For a more clear and crisp sound, go for the M100. For a more warm sound, go for the Ulltrafocus 8000's. But, you know what, if you're a basshead, you really ought to save up for both.... If you're cost concious and can't afford either of those two, get the UE6000's; they are going rediculous cheap right now (7/17/14), and I recommend the white ones; you won't be disappointed.
Плазмонавт-0WXMO
31.07.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Introduction
First off, I'd like to thank the kind folks at Audio-Technica for providing a review sample of the CKS1000.
Yes, this is it, the final and entry into the Solid Bass lineup, the most expensive and (hopefully) best sounding CKS earphone of them all. Retailing for $250, the CKS1000 is far beyond what many would consider "impulse buy" territory and entered the realm of a rather significant investment. It also runs against some significant competition at this price point so it will have to offer a competitively detailed quality of sound to be worth its price over its competitors.
So, does the CKS1000 have what it takes to stand out or is it destined to be lost in the crowd? Read on to find out.
Accessories: Inside the rather lavish packaging are four pairs of silicone eartips, a set of manuals a leather carrying case and two audio cables that, much like the WS99, attach just below the y-split. One is a standard audio-only cable and the other includes a built in remote and microphone with volume adjustment.
Design and Build Quality: The housings of the CKS1000 are plastic and similar to the CKS99 but feature a few nicer accents to differentiate it from the lower end models. Overall, the earphones seem nicely built with sturdy cables and black plastic housings with a soft touch feel and a rubberized ring around the edges where the housings come into contact with your outer ear.
Comfort: Like its siblings, the fit of the CKS1000 could be a point of contention for some but I was once again pleased with the fit of the CKS1000 as it was mostly unobtrusive for me over long periods. The driver sat in my outer ear nicely without exerting any unpleasant pressure.
Isolation: These isolate well for a vented dynamic IEM.
Microphonics: A tad unpleasant at times but nothing excessive.
Sound Quality
Burn in: The CKS1000 was given upwards of 100 hours of burn in time prior to review. Minor changes were detected, particularly in the upper regions, which smoothed out slightly and the bass, which mellowed a bit.
The bottom end is, as should be expected by this point, forward and plentiful. As with the previous models, the midbass seems a tad more prominent than the sub bass, which reaches down low with good authority but doesn't quite match up with the deep bass rumble of other bass centric IEMs like the Miles Davis Tributes or Wooduo 2 as it rolls off gradually past 60Hz or so. The CKS1000 does manage to impress overall with its dry and detailed low end that has the authority to demand notice and the tightness necessary to avoid occluding the lower mids...most of the time.
The midrange is a tiny bit recessed but retains the ability to put vocals at the center of the presentation like the CKS99 and like its sibling, the midrange is a tad grainy and veiled but still quite detailed and energetic. This is not a "lay back and relax" type of IEM, this is an earphone that makes sure you're engaged at all times. In some ways, this can be a bit of a detriment as it makes the CKS1000 more prone to sibilance than I'd like. The treble, while a bit less emphasized compared to the rest of the sound signature, is rather peaky and doesn't extend as far as I'd like but is clear and airy and has plenty of sparkle.
The overall presentation of the CKS1000 is drier than a good martini but as alluring as the smile on the sexy bartender who served it to you. The presentation is edgy and forward with a good sense of space and separation between vocalists and instruments and does a good job of presenting micro detail on the level of Like the other Solid Bass earphones, I can easily close my eyes and imagine I'm standing in a nice nightclub, dressed in a smart suit, a martini glass held loosely between my fingers. But unlike the CKS77 and CKS99, I'm not in the middle of the crowd, I'm looking out over it from the VIP section.
But I have to address the flaws I mentioned before once again and I'm sure this is going to sound like some apologist nonsense to some but hear me out. No one would be remiss in pointing out the peaky treble, veiled midrange or huge bass as valid criticisms, especially for a $200+ IEM but somehow, the flaws tend to melt away over extended periods. Sure, the CKS1000 does sound veiled next to the RE-400 but they have a very engaging, energetic quality that's oddly alluring. And then, you look up and 20 minutes have gone by and you're left wondering what you were complaining about before.
Conclusion
The Audio-Technica CKS1000 is available from various online retailers including Amazon for wildly varying prices. On Amazon I've seen them as low as $170 plus shipping from Japanese sellers and around $210 from US based sellers. On eBay, the price varies as well but finding one below $200 or so may be quite difficult. For the price, I think they're a prett
First off, I'd like to thank the kind folks at Audio-Technica for providing a review sample of the CKS1000.
Yes, this is it, the final and entry into the Solid Bass lineup, the most expensive and (hopefully) best sounding CKS earphone of them all. Retailing for $250, the CKS1000 is far beyond what many would consider "impulse buy" territory and entered the realm of a rather significant investment. It also runs against some significant competition at this price point so it will have to offer a competitively detailed quality of sound to be worth its price over its competitors.
So, does the CKS1000 have what it takes to stand out or is it destined to be lost in the crowd? Read on to find out.
Accessories: Inside the rather lavish packaging are four pairs of silicone eartips, a set of manuals a leather carrying case and two audio cables that, much like the WS99, attach just below the y-split. One is a standard audio-only cable and the other includes a built in remote and microphone with volume adjustment.
Design and Build Quality: The housings of the CKS1000 are plastic and similar to the CKS99 but feature a few nicer accents to differentiate it from the lower end models. Overall, the earphones seem nicely built with sturdy cables and black plastic housings with a soft touch feel and a rubberized ring around the edges where the housings come into contact with your outer ear.
Comfort: Like its siblings, the fit of the CKS1000 could be a point of contention for some but I was once again pleased with the fit of the CKS1000 as it was mostly unobtrusive for me over long periods. The driver sat in my outer ear nicely without exerting any unpleasant pressure.
Isolation: These isolate well for a vented dynamic IEM.
Microphonics: A tad unpleasant at times but nothing excessive.
Sound Quality
Burn in: The CKS1000 was given upwards of 100 hours of burn in time prior to review. Minor changes were detected, particularly in the upper regions, which smoothed out slightly and the bass, which mellowed a bit.
The bottom end is, as should be expected by this point, forward and plentiful. As with the previous models, the midbass seems a tad more prominent than the sub bass, which reaches down low with good authority but doesn't quite match up with the deep bass rumble of other bass centric IEMs like the Miles Davis Tributes or Wooduo 2 as it rolls off gradually past 60Hz or so. The CKS1000 does manage to impress overall with its dry and detailed low end that has the authority to demand notice and the tightness necessary to avoid occluding the lower mids...most of the time.
The midrange is a tiny bit recessed but retains the ability to put vocals at the center of the presentation like the CKS99 and like its sibling, the midrange is a tad grainy and veiled but still quite detailed and energetic. This is not a "lay back and relax" type of IEM, this is an earphone that makes sure you're engaged at all times. In some ways, this can be a bit of a detriment as it makes the CKS1000 more prone to sibilance than I'd like. The treble, while a bit less emphasized compared to the rest of the sound signature, is rather peaky and doesn't extend as far as I'd like but is clear and airy and has plenty of sparkle.
The overall presentation of the CKS1000 is drier than a good martini but as alluring as the smile on the sexy bartender who served it to you. The presentation is edgy and forward with a good sense of space and separation between vocalists and instruments and does a good job of presenting micro detail on the level of Like the other Solid Bass earphones, I can easily close my eyes and imagine I'm standing in a nice nightclub, dressed in a smart suit, a martini glass held loosely between my fingers. But unlike the CKS77 and CKS99, I'm not in the middle of the crowd, I'm looking out over it from the VIP section.
But I have to address the flaws I mentioned before once again and I'm sure this is going to sound like some apologist nonsense to some but hear me out. No one would be remiss in pointing out the peaky treble, veiled midrange or huge bass as valid criticisms, especially for a $200+ IEM but somehow, the flaws tend to melt away over extended periods. Sure, the CKS1000 does sound veiled next to the RE-400 but they have a very engaging, energetic quality that's oddly alluring. And then, you look up and 20 minutes have gone by and you're left wondering what you were complaining about before.
Conclusion
The Audio-Technica CKS1000 is available from various online retailers including Amazon for wildly varying prices. On Amazon I've seen them as low as $170 plus shipping from Japanese sellers and around $210 from US based sellers. On eBay, the price varies as well but finding one below $200 or so may be quite difficult. For the price, I think they're a prett
Сириус-3HFHV
07.07.2015
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
The most natural sounding in-ear earphone I've ever heard. I dare say this even beats the Shure IEMs all the way up to the SE535. The bass always stays at the back and is very natural, never overpowering. The highs although may sound harsh at first listen, will gradually sound more pleasing as you listen to it, and it has a certain quality to it that almost makes it dance at times. The mids steal the show here, they are airy and forward and is always clear. If that isn't enough, the soundstage is insane, I swear at times you feel as if you were listening to a pair of full sized over the head headphones. But of course YMMV depending on the genre of music, your equipment, and the source.
I prefer this over the CKR10 which has a more closely packed soundstage, stronger bass, and rolled back highs. But the trade off being it has sweeter mids. Vocal representation sounded better on that variant, so look into that if you're into that kind of thing.
What is preventing this from, getting 5 stars? The comfort. No matter how I adjust it, even after changing serveral ear tips, I always feel some discomfort after about 15 minutes of wearing. Its not unbearable, but enough to be noticable everytime. On top of that,the cable as you can tell from the pictures, is non detachable, and for an earphone of this price and caliber I would expect Audio-Technica to include one. The cable is generally alright, but it does feel flimsy at times. I always feel the need to carefully coil it up before storing it in my pelican case. The microphonics are terrible too, and since its not detachable you don't have the option to swap it out for a better one.
As a side remark, I highly recommend getting a set of JVC Spiral Dot Tips for use with this earphone. The dots in the tips act as a diffuser of some sort and it helps open up the soundstage a little more while taming a bit of the highs. The Comply foam tips work great as well, and I currently use them with the Ts-400. They will fit perfectly.
I cannot recommend these enough. They will honestly surprise you. Audio-Technica's engineers have done an AMAZING job and this product indeed lives up to its marketing. I'll say it again, this is most natural sounding dyanmic driver earphone I have ever heard, and the sound alone is well worth the price, though I wish it had detachable cables.
I prefer this over the CKR10 which has a more closely packed soundstage, stronger bass, and rolled back highs. But the trade off being it has sweeter mids. Vocal representation sounded better on that variant, so look into that if you're into that kind of thing.
What is preventing this from, getting 5 stars? The comfort. No matter how I adjust it, even after changing serveral ear tips, I always feel some discomfort after about 15 minutes of wearing. Its not unbearable, but enough to be noticable everytime. On top of that,the cable as you can tell from the pictures, is non detachable, and for an earphone of this price and caliber I would expect Audio-Technica to include one. The cable is generally alright, but it does feel flimsy at times. I always feel the need to carefully coil it up before storing it in my pelican case. The microphonics are terrible too, and since its not detachable you don't have the option to swap it out for a better one.
As a side remark, I highly recommend getting a set of JVC Spiral Dot Tips for use with this earphone. The dots in the tips act as a diffuser of some sort and it helps open up the soundstage a little more while taming a bit of the highs. The Comply foam tips work great as well, and I currently use them with the Ts-400. They will fit perfectly.
I cannot recommend these enough. They will honestly surprise you. Audio-Technica's engineers have done an AMAZING job and this product indeed lives up to its marketing. I'll say it again, this is most natural sounding dyanmic driver earphone I have ever heard, and the sound alone is well worth the price, though I wish it had detachable cables.
Фотон-2OCRU
05.06.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Introduction
First off, I'd like to thank the folks at Audio-Technica for the sample of the WS99 for review.
Here it is, the pinnacle of Audio-Technica's "Solid Bass" line of portable headphones, the WS99. Arriving in a big, audacious black box, the WS99 makes its presence known with its sharp (literally) aluminum accents, its large but not heavy construction and promises of excellent bass and sound quality. Jumping into the premium price bracket, with an MSRP of $250, sending it into direct competition with the Beats by Dre Studios, the original consumer focused portable headphone and, frankly, fashion accessory. So, does the WS99 measure up as a suitable king of the Solid Bass hill and make a solid case for your cash? Read on to find out.
Accessories: The WS99 includes two interchangeable cables. The first cable is a standard extension and the other features a built in microphone, sliding volume control and one button remote.
Design and Build Quality: At the top of the Solid Bass food chain, the WS99 is a hefty and beefy portable headphone that feels heavier and more solidly built than the WS77. The detachable cables are nicely built and feel durable.
Comfort: The WS99 is actually quite comfortable with its bigger and slightly softer pads. Despite the fact that I don't particularly love on-ear headphones, I found the WS99 to be quite comfortable over long periods.
Isolation: The WS99 isolates well for a non-circumaural headphone, despite the fact that the WS99 is semi-open.
Sound Quality
Burn in: These were given 100+ hours of burn in prior to review. A lower treble spike I noticed early on mellowed out over time.
Having heard its siblings, I was hardly surprised by the type of sound signature the WS99 presents. Put simply, it's an evolution on the signature of the WS77 but with refinements in key places that make it audibly superior.
The low end is, like the WS77, very full bodied and well detailed but with a bit more sub bass extension to really liven things up. Though the bass is obviously emphasized, it's totally unobtrusive and really only steps forward when asked. In some cases, you might not notice that it's emphasized until you put on a song that calls for a meaty low end, say Daft Punk's Get Lucky and the WS99 really shows how punchy and engaging it can be. That 53mm driver can produce some powerful, but controlled, bass.
The midrange is lush and smooth, lacking the slight hollowness I noticed in the WS77 and sounds quite full and pleasant. It's quite clear despite its warmth and smoothness and sounds absolutely lovely with Jazz and R&B pieces. The lower treble is a bit forward which occasionally results in a tiny bit of sibilance but nothing especially annoying or irritating. The treble presence is neither forward nor recessed but carries a nice sense of sparkle and is well extended.
The soundstage is fairly wide and deep for a closed portable can but the WS99 is also quite good at presenting a sense of intimacy due to the smooth and lush nature of the midrange and the sonic image is quite accurate. Its overall presentation is a well-balanced one, despite the enhanced bass, one that isn't neutral but is well controlled with good linearity through the midrange and treble that makes for a quite pleasing sound.
Conclusion
The WS99 sits at the pinnacle of the Audio-Technica's "Solid Bass" line and unsurprisingly sounds the best of the three headphones in that line. Its sound is rich and engaging and works with a wide array of different genres. The casual crowd should love it for its emphasized bass and good looks while the audiophile will appreciate its attention to detail and engaging sound.
The Audio-Technica WS99 is available from a number online retailers for prices hovering between $170 and $220 on Amazon and even higher than its $250 MSRP, which is rather mind boggling. At the $211 price (at the time of writing) from Amazon directly, I think the WS99 is a great portable headphone that earns its keep with its sound quality alone.
The only problem is, at about $100 more than the WS77 based solely on its MSRP. If I were to grade the two, I'd say the WS77 is maybe 85 to 90 percent of the WS99 in terms of pure sound quality but the WS99 gains more points over the WS77 in terms of build, comfort and versatility. So, if money is tight, the WS77 is still an excellent choice but if you can afford the extra cash, the WS99 is definitely the headphone to buy for its more refined and engaging sound signature and certainly the best I've heard in a portable headphone. I hate sounding like a shill, especially since I'm not being paid for this, but if you're willing to pay the relatively high price (and seeing as Beats Audio holds a commanding portion of the upper end headphone market, I'd imagine many are), the WS99 is a great headphone
First off, I'd like to thank the folks at Audio-Technica for the sample of the WS99 for review.
Here it is, the pinnacle of Audio-Technica's "Solid Bass" line of portable headphones, the WS99. Arriving in a big, audacious black box, the WS99 makes its presence known with its sharp (literally) aluminum accents, its large but not heavy construction and promises of excellent bass and sound quality. Jumping into the premium price bracket, with an MSRP of $250, sending it into direct competition with the Beats by Dre Studios, the original consumer focused portable headphone and, frankly, fashion accessory. So, does the WS99 measure up as a suitable king of the Solid Bass hill and make a solid case for your cash? Read on to find out.
Accessories: The WS99 includes two interchangeable cables. The first cable is a standard extension and the other features a built in microphone, sliding volume control and one button remote.
Design and Build Quality: At the top of the Solid Bass food chain, the WS99 is a hefty and beefy portable headphone that feels heavier and more solidly built than the WS77. The detachable cables are nicely built and feel durable.
Comfort: The WS99 is actually quite comfortable with its bigger and slightly softer pads. Despite the fact that I don't particularly love on-ear headphones, I found the WS99 to be quite comfortable over long periods.
Isolation: The WS99 isolates well for a non-circumaural headphone, despite the fact that the WS99 is semi-open.
Sound Quality
Burn in: These were given 100+ hours of burn in prior to review. A lower treble spike I noticed early on mellowed out over time.
Having heard its siblings, I was hardly surprised by the type of sound signature the WS99 presents. Put simply, it's an evolution on the signature of the WS77 but with refinements in key places that make it audibly superior.
The low end is, like the WS77, very full bodied and well detailed but with a bit more sub bass extension to really liven things up. Though the bass is obviously emphasized, it's totally unobtrusive and really only steps forward when asked. In some cases, you might not notice that it's emphasized until you put on a song that calls for a meaty low end, say Daft Punk's Get Lucky and the WS99 really shows how punchy and engaging it can be. That 53mm driver can produce some powerful, but controlled, bass.
The midrange is lush and smooth, lacking the slight hollowness I noticed in the WS77 and sounds quite full and pleasant. It's quite clear despite its warmth and smoothness and sounds absolutely lovely with Jazz and R&B pieces. The lower treble is a bit forward which occasionally results in a tiny bit of sibilance but nothing especially annoying or irritating. The treble presence is neither forward nor recessed but carries a nice sense of sparkle and is well extended.
The soundstage is fairly wide and deep for a closed portable can but the WS99 is also quite good at presenting a sense of intimacy due to the smooth and lush nature of the midrange and the sonic image is quite accurate. Its overall presentation is a well-balanced one, despite the enhanced bass, one that isn't neutral but is well controlled with good linearity through the midrange and treble that makes for a quite pleasing sound.
Conclusion
The WS99 sits at the pinnacle of the Audio-Technica's "Solid Bass" line and unsurprisingly sounds the best of the three headphones in that line. Its sound is rich and engaging and works with a wide array of different genres. The casual crowd should love it for its emphasized bass and good looks while the audiophile will appreciate its attention to detail and engaging sound.
The Audio-Technica WS99 is available from a number online retailers for prices hovering between $170 and $220 on Amazon and even higher than its $250 MSRP, which is rather mind boggling. At the $211 price (at the time of writing) from Amazon directly, I think the WS99 is a great portable headphone that earns its keep with its sound quality alone.
The only problem is, at about $100 more than the WS77 based solely on its MSRP. If I were to grade the two, I'd say the WS77 is maybe 85 to 90 percent of the WS99 in terms of pure sound quality but the WS99 gains more points over the WS77 in terms of build, comfort and versatility. So, if money is tight, the WS77 is still an excellent choice but if you can afford the extra cash, the WS99 is definitely the headphone to buy for its more refined and engaging sound signature and certainly the best I've heard in a portable headphone. I hate sounding like a shill, especially since I'm not being paid for this, but if you're willing to pay the relatively high price (and seeing as Beats Audio holds a commanding portion of the upper end headphone market, I'd imagine many are), the WS99 is a great headphone
НаноПилигрим-7FSKO
13.02.2014
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
This was the final pair that I wanted to try and I suspected that they may just the perfect pair based on all the glowing reviews. Out of 6 headphones that I ordered between $180-$299, with the intention of finding headphones with good bass for listening to modern music, this pair is just okay, and in my opinion not worth the price if it's not on sale for under $200. I would not recommend them over most of the other similarly-priced pairs.
Bass:
The bass on these headphones is plentiful, but the emphasis is not right. The most noticeable volume boost on this pair happens around 100hz to 250hz, meaning they give you a lot of low-mid thump. Below that, they sound very average, and the deep, extended bass does not impress. The bass bump is misplaced enough to affect even female vocals, and often times create a very unnatural sound. All of the other headphones I tried that were bass-oriented did not have this problem. Honestly, this sound signature makes headphones sound like cheap headphones, barely saved by the decent mids and highs.
Mids and highs:
Mids and highs sound surprisingly well-balanced. The mid is present and natural, and the highs are smooth. There is definitely nothing missing in the entire upper range, and no serious distortion of sound. The extended highs are relaxed, and although you can hear the sparkly parts of the song, they are quiet. I think this is a good approach on its own, but in combination with the "bass", it really does not help the problem of mud.
Overall, I think the bass is the biggest flaw for these headphones, even if you are looking for headphones with "solid bass" or if you are a basshead. The bass just thumps and creates a claustrophobic sound without giving you that rumble that we want to hear as if listening with a nice subwoofer. With these headphones you will never get an exciting sound because there aren't enough highs to balance out the bass. With all that said, these headphones do not sound horrible, but in a lineup of the headphones that I tried, I doubt anyone would pick this pair. Oh, and they also press against my ears and are not comfortable for extended listening sessions over an hour.
The pairs that I tried that I can sincerely recommend over this pair are:
Beyerdynamic Custom One Pro: has somewhat useful adjustable bass feature, and has very good bass and a warm sound that's also exciting and good for all types of music. The least expensive option, and if on sale is undoubtedly the best sound for the price out of these pairs. SUPER comfortable.
Denon D600: has a very warm sound with a good amount of bass, especially extended bass, but a little sloppy-sounding. Also has really crispy extended highs that are not sibilant. Comfortable for long-period listening.
V-moda M100: This one is a basshead's dream, with a very fun sound, but the mids are a little bit lacking. Uncomfortable for long-term listening, presses against the ears. I had to order the XL earpads for $25 to fix this problem.
AKG K545: The pair that I decided to keep. It has a bright sound that is not warm, but also with lots of deep, extended bass. I picked this pair out of all 6 pairs because it is suitable for all types of music and has very good highs, although the bass might not have enough thump or impact for true bassheads. These are also not comfortable for extended listening periods, so I took apart the earpads and stuffed cotton inside, which was a very good solution to the comfort issue, and gave a better seal for more rumbly bass.
NAD VISO HP50: Has a very balanced and analytical, but somewhat warm sound without much extended highs nor bass. I would not recommend these if you like to listen to modern music that utilizes the full range of human hearing, especially hip hop or electronic music. These press against your ears, but I'm not sure if they are comfortable for extended listening periods, as I decided almost immediately to repack them and return them.
Bass:
The bass on these headphones is plentiful, but the emphasis is not right. The most noticeable volume boost on this pair happens around 100hz to 250hz, meaning they give you a lot of low-mid thump. Below that, they sound very average, and the deep, extended bass does not impress. The bass bump is misplaced enough to affect even female vocals, and often times create a very unnatural sound. All of the other headphones I tried that were bass-oriented did not have this problem. Honestly, this sound signature makes headphones sound like cheap headphones, barely saved by the decent mids and highs.
Mids and highs:
Mids and highs sound surprisingly well-balanced. The mid is present and natural, and the highs are smooth. There is definitely nothing missing in the entire upper range, and no serious distortion of sound. The extended highs are relaxed, and although you can hear the sparkly parts of the song, they are quiet. I think this is a good approach on its own, but in combination with the "bass", it really does not help the problem of mud.
Overall, I think the bass is the biggest flaw for these headphones, even if you are looking for headphones with "solid bass" or if you are a basshead. The bass just thumps and creates a claustrophobic sound without giving you that rumble that we want to hear as if listening with a nice subwoofer. With these headphones you will never get an exciting sound because there aren't enough highs to balance out the bass. With all that said, these headphones do not sound horrible, but in a lineup of the headphones that I tried, I doubt anyone would pick this pair. Oh, and they also press against my ears and are not comfortable for extended listening sessions over an hour.
The pairs that I tried that I can sincerely recommend over this pair are:
Beyerdynamic Custom One Pro: has somewhat useful adjustable bass feature, and has very good bass and a warm sound that's also exciting and good for all types of music. The least expensive option, and if on sale is undoubtedly the best sound for the price out of these pairs. SUPER comfortable.
Denon D600: has a very warm sound with a good amount of bass, especially extended bass, but a little sloppy-sounding. Also has really crispy extended highs that are not sibilant. Comfortable for long-period listening.
V-moda M100: This one is a basshead's dream, with a very fun sound, but the mids are a little bit lacking. Uncomfortable for long-term listening, presses against the ears. I had to order the XL earpads for $25 to fix this problem.
AKG K545: The pair that I decided to keep. It has a bright sound that is not warm, but also with lots of deep, extended bass. I picked this pair out of all 6 pairs because it is suitable for all types of music and has very good highs, although the bass might not have enough thump or impact for true bassheads. These are also not comfortable for extended listening periods, so I took apart the earpads and stuffed cotton inside, which was a very good solution to the comfort issue, and gave a better seal for more rumbly bass.
NAD VISO HP50: Has a very balanced and analytical, but somewhat warm sound without much extended highs nor bass. I would not recommend these if you like to listen to modern music that utilizes the full range of human hearing, especially hip hop or electronic music. These press against your ears, but I'm not sure if they are comfortable for extended listening periods, as I decided almost immediately to repack them and return them.
Пандорец-9TIQF
25.05.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Introduction
First off, I'd like to thank the folks at Audio-Technica for the sample of the WS77 for review.
Yes, I've been on something of a roll recently with Audio-Technica headphones. First the Audio-Technica ATH-WS55BK, then the Audio-Technica ATH-PRO700MK2 and now the next entry into the Solid Bass portable headphone line, the WS77, which slots in between the WS55 and WS99 as the mid-range option in their lineup. Having heard the WS55 and finding it good but unrefined, can the WS77 outshine its sibling and offer a more compelling option to those looking for a portable headphone? Read on to find out.
Accessories: None to speak of.
Design and Build Quality: The lightweight plastic construction is more robust than that of the lower end WS55 in part due to the aluminum faceplates on the earcups and feels fairly sturdy, but I'd probably still baby them a bit more than many other headphones I've used. The dual entry cable feels about as good as the WS55's and they fold flat but don't completely fold up like the M50 and Pro700MK2 but isn't nearly as large as those two either.
Comfort: The WS77 is a supra-aural (on ear) headphone with rather soft and cushy pads both on the earcups and headband and doesn't clamp as hard as some other supra-aural cans I've used. The result is a very tolerable fit (on- ear cans usually annoy me) and one that I can enjoy for longer periods without too much discomfort.
Isolation: These isolate well for a supra-aural can and sound leakage is minimal.
Sound Quality
Burn In: These were burned in for upwards of 50 hours prior to review, after which the bass seemed a bit tighter and the highs and upper mids were a little less prominent.
As Audio-Technica's mid-range entry into its "Solid Bass" line, the WS77 is expectedly improved over the cheaper WS55 but to a surprisingly significant degree. The low end, while still quite powerful and robust, isn't nearly as mid-bass happy or as bloated as the WS55. Extension is good, rolling off gently after about 60 - 70Hz or so. There's a nice degree of texture to the bass that I didn't find in the WS55 as well but it doesn't have the same level of detail as the Pro700MK2.
Moving up, the midrange sounds slightly recessed but only slightly and not as much so as the WS55. Thanks to the newfound tightness in the low end, it doesn't smear the midrange presentation. Truth be told, I actually find the midrange quite enjoyable and its clarity and detail is quite good. It doesn't have the same kind of upper-mid sibilance I heard from the WS55 and presents vocals better because of it. I must note that there's a bit of hollowness in the mids that I can't seem to shake but it wasn't a significant issue.
The treble presentation is somewhat forward and sparkly but not "bright". It generally remains smooth and fairly airy without unpleasant peaks or grain. There is a bit of roll off at the top end but the WS77 carries enough treble energy and detail to avoid sounding too "dark".
The presentation is fairly spacious for a portable closed headphone and rarely sounds muffled or excessively closed in. The sound is nicely layered and imaging is pretty good overall. Tonally, I'd say the sound is a tad warm and sweet with nice, emphasized but well controlled bass that plays especially well with Jazz, Electronic and Hip-Hop but is versatile enough to sound pretty good with just about everything.
Conclusion
It's pretty obvious at this point that I think these are significantly better than the lower end WS55. The sound signature is better balanced, more detailed and better all-around for a wider range of music than the lower end model. But, is the WS77 worth the going rates of about $120 up from sites like Amazon and other authorized retailers (side note: be careful when buying these from just anywhere since a large number of Audio-Technica headphones have been counterfeited and these might be as well)? As far as I'm concerned, yes. I think these are a very good choice for a stylish and great sounding pair of portable headphones as the WS77 strikes a very good balance between the bass-driven, consumer-oriented sound many casual users crave and the kind of high fidelity audiophiles desire. Because of this balance, the WS77 should appeal to a wide range of listeners, perhaps even those who don't care for emphasized bass.
First off, I'd like to thank the folks at Audio-Technica for the sample of the WS77 for review.
Yes, I've been on something of a roll recently with Audio-Technica headphones. First the Audio-Technica ATH-WS55BK, then the Audio-Technica ATH-PRO700MK2 and now the next entry into the Solid Bass portable headphone line, the WS77, which slots in between the WS55 and WS99 as the mid-range option in their lineup. Having heard the WS55 and finding it good but unrefined, can the WS77 outshine its sibling and offer a more compelling option to those looking for a portable headphone? Read on to find out.
Accessories: None to speak of.
Design and Build Quality: The lightweight plastic construction is more robust than that of the lower end WS55 in part due to the aluminum faceplates on the earcups and feels fairly sturdy, but I'd probably still baby them a bit more than many other headphones I've used. The dual entry cable feels about as good as the WS55's and they fold flat but don't completely fold up like the M50 and Pro700MK2 but isn't nearly as large as those two either.
Comfort: The WS77 is a supra-aural (on ear) headphone with rather soft and cushy pads both on the earcups and headband and doesn't clamp as hard as some other supra-aural cans I've used. The result is a very tolerable fit (on- ear cans usually annoy me) and one that I can enjoy for longer periods without too much discomfort.
Isolation: These isolate well for a supra-aural can and sound leakage is minimal.
Sound Quality
Burn In: These were burned in for upwards of 50 hours prior to review, after which the bass seemed a bit tighter and the highs and upper mids were a little less prominent.
As Audio-Technica's mid-range entry into its "Solid Bass" line, the WS77 is expectedly improved over the cheaper WS55 but to a surprisingly significant degree. The low end, while still quite powerful and robust, isn't nearly as mid-bass happy or as bloated as the WS55. Extension is good, rolling off gently after about 60 - 70Hz or so. There's a nice degree of texture to the bass that I didn't find in the WS55 as well but it doesn't have the same level of detail as the Pro700MK2.
Moving up, the midrange sounds slightly recessed but only slightly and not as much so as the WS55. Thanks to the newfound tightness in the low end, it doesn't smear the midrange presentation. Truth be told, I actually find the midrange quite enjoyable and its clarity and detail is quite good. It doesn't have the same kind of upper-mid sibilance I heard from the WS55 and presents vocals better because of it. I must note that there's a bit of hollowness in the mids that I can't seem to shake but it wasn't a significant issue.
The treble presentation is somewhat forward and sparkly but not "bright". It generally remains smooth and fairly airy without unpleasant peaks or grain. There is a bit of roll off at the top end but the WS77 carries enough treble energy and detail to avoid sounding too "dark".
The presentation is fairly spacious for a portable closed headphone and rarely sounds muffled or excessively closed in. The sound is nicely layered and imaging is pretty good overall. Tonally, I'd say the sound is a tad warm and sweet with nice, emphasized but well controlled bass that plays especially well with Jazz, Electronic and Hip-Hop but is versatile enough to sound pretty good with just about everything.
Conclusion
It's pretty obvious at this point that I think these are significantly better than the lower end WS55. The sound signature is better balanced, more detailed and better all-around for a wider range of music than the lower end model. But, is the WS77 worth the going rates of about $120 up from sites like Amazon and other authorized retailers (side note: be careful when buying these from just anywhere since a large number of Audio-Technica headphones have been counterfeited and these might be as well)? As far as I'm concerned, yes. I think these are a very good choice for a stylish and great sounding pair of portable headphones as the WS77 strikes a very good balance between the bass-driven, consumer-oriented sound many casual users crave and the kind of high fidelity audiophiles desire. Because of this balance, the WS77 should appeal to a wide range of listeners, perhaps even those who don't care for emphasized bass.
Показаны отзывы 1321-1344 из 1457.
