Фотоаппарат Nikon D600 Body — подробный обзор, плюсы и минусы на основе 511 отзывов
Рейтинг:
Хорошо
Хорошо
Средняя цена в магазинах 35 110 ₽
Краткие характеристики:
- зеркальный
- 24.70 МП
- 35.9 x 24 мм
- RAW
- до 5.50 к/с
- видео до 1920x1080
- 760 г
511 отзывов пользователей о Nikon D600 Body
Пользовались
Nikon D600 Body?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Скромный эксперт
26.10.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I am an owner of D800E and D3s,and previously owned D40 D80 D90 D5000 D7000 and D700. I grabbed my D600 a week ago and will continue to update my review of the camera.Initial impressions of this camera is excellent. I am surprised at how much lighter and smaller it feels when I took it out for casual shooting. To have a robust 24 mp, full frame camera with amazing image quality that at the same time is easy to bring about is just great. I am starting to realize it's a great backup camera to my heavier DSLRs as well with its competent image quality and full frame sensor that works well with all my full frame lenses. My wife, having owned a D5100 for a year or so, is still adjusting to the weight but she loves the incredible bright and big viewfinder, faster frame rate and the clear, easy-to-see 39 AF points as some of the upgrades over D5100 (D5100 has these little tiny red dots which sometimes she has difficulty seeing).This thing is built well, with partial magnesium metal body like the D7000 and all that plastic to save weight. It's perfect for amateurs who takes real good care of their cameras and dont really bang it around like the fast-action professionals do. It inherited some goodies from the D7000 and the D800, and it's priced right in between making it such an excellent package. It has the custom U1 U2 settings from the D7000 which store COMPLETE user settings, allowing you to switch between customized shooting modes without the need to play around with a lot of buttons and menu digging (since it also has less buttons than D800 and D4). It also has a decent frame rate similar to the D7000. Some stuff from the D800 is the nice 3.2" LCD and the AUTO ISO sensitivity feature which adjust the ISO based on your focal length, incredibly useful for mid-to-telephoto zoom lenses such as the 70-200mm 2.8 VR II (camera shake and motion blurriness from hand held shots gets more obvious with longer focal lengths and heavier lenses). The upper mode dial also gets updated with a lock with prevents accidental switch between A, S, Auto, M modes etc. It shares the exact same battery as the D7000 and D800, which is great because I can share all batteries and chargers between these bodies. The D600 feels fast just like the D7000, not crazy fast like D3S or D4, but fast enough for most photographers. I actually felt my D800E is sluggishI have yet to do AF fine tuning on the D600 on my lenses. After a few days of shoot, I think the D600 has pretty accurate AF. I need to fine tune them to be perfect but at 100% you can tell its AF accuracy is pretty close even in high contrast scenes. The details obviously doesnt rival the D800E, but it's not a lot of difference for anything other than 100% pixel peeping. High ISO performance is good, but my initial impressions are that it's a bit less capable than the D800E. You will be very pleased with the high ISO performance if you are coming from a DX sensor DSLR. But for a 24mp I expect it to be better than the 36mp D800E, but it doesnt appear that way to me.I feel the power switch of the D600 is a little firmer to turn on and off than a D7000 or D800, not sure if that's a good or bad thing.The size of the D600 14-bit raw files are about 25-30mb, not small but definitely a lot better than the 44-50mb raws that I have been getting from the D800E.Some cons of the camera, which I find as something quite minor, are as follows:- the AF module inherited from the D7000 is for a cropped sensor DX camera, so the 39 AF points are really clustered in the center, so you lose a lot of the boundary focus points like the D800 and D4 (OR EVEN THE d700 d3s d3). I typically focus then recompose, so this does not bother me as much. But you might find this annoying if you like to compose using boundary focus points.- the flash syn speed is 1/200s vs D800 and D4's 1/250. This is really minor, and even the Canon folks have been using 1/200s syn for a while so I dont know if this will actually upset anyone. The D600 does have high speed syn with SB, so that's a big plus for using Nikon speedlights in the day. Most lower end DX cameras do not have this feature, and it really cripples the use of day time flash.- the max. shutter speed is 1/4000s vs 1/8000 of the D7000, D800 and D4. This might annoy folks who like to shoot wide open at F/1.4 in bright daylight, but then there are ways to get around it such as shoot in the shade, get some filters or polarizers or simply shoot in softer lighting.- in the movie mode live view, you cannot adjust the aperture (if you use the latest AF-S lenses without an aperture ring). You have to switch off live view, adjust the right aperture and then switch it back on to live view. This might annoy some videoshooters. I don't recall my D800E having this problem- I have read rumors of D600 sensors easily catching dust due to a leak somewhere, I have yet to test it myself and update later.- dual SD cards are slower than the fastest CF cards, but they are accepted more easily b
Скромный эксперт
01.10.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
As a D300 owner, I passed on the D700 and D800 waiting for a more affordable full frame with decent video options. I just got the D600 last Monday and put it through a stress test shooting a wedding this past Saturday. Here're my initial impressions, which I'll start off with first.CONS:1) The hand grip is smaller than the D300. Yes, the camera as a whole is smaller than the D300 (obviously, people will be comparing it as a full frame D7000), but the grip is less comfortable on the D600 than the D300 because my fingers are a bit longer. After spending 10+ hours shooting a wedding, I didn't really notice any discomfort, but the D300 definitely sits in my hand better.2) The autofocus. Yes, low-light autofocus is terrible- I feel like it's much worse than the D300 (keep in mind, that's in low light- bright light is perfectly fine). I loathe using flash, and the D600 couldn't lock focus in low light- I ended up having to auto-focus using the center point so I could trigger the AF-illuminator light, and even then sometimes it struggled (using my 50mm and 20mm prime lenses). When paired with a SB-600, it autofocused fine in low light.3) AF-Area Points- Yes, the AF coverage is smaller than the D300. If you want to shoot by rule of thirds, good luck- the corners just seem to be outside of the AF area. Fortunately, you've got 24 MP to work with, so you can crop it til it works.4) Takes SD cards. Not really THAT bad, but I've got a bunch of compact flash cards that I was hoping to use. Fortunately, you can snag a sandisk 32gb class 10 for about $32 these days. That'll last you over a thousand shots on JPG FINE5) Mode dial lock- it takes a little TOO hard of a press to unlock the mode dial to switch it from M to the U1 and U2 buttons. I ended up not using it THAT frequently, but I'm sure I'll use it more as I get more time with my camera.6) Switching ISO/WB/Quality- If you're used to the highly useful top layout of the D300 for quick changes, I'm sure it'll get easier to switch these settings on the side panel (like my old D70).And really, the autofocus and hand grip were the two biggest cons for me. BUT, now that that's out of the way, let's get onto the good stuff:PROS:1) Full frame. Hands down. I've only used a D70 and D300, so having a full frame sensor is AMAZING. Dynamic range, picture quality straight out of the JPGs looks drastically better than APS-C sensors. While AF was hit or miss in low light, when it DID get the shot, shots at ISO6400 in near darkness were comparable to (if not better than) ISO1600 on my D300. It's amazing turning night into day indoors with low noise. For a non-flash junkie, this is a godsend.2) No crop factor- Another benefit of fullframe is not having the lens crop factor. My 20mm f/2.8 is now as wide as my DX 10.5mm fisheye! If you're into real estate photography, this is perfect for "getting it all in" for indoors shots, whereas the D300 rendered my 20mm f/2.8 as more like a 30mm lens. Yes, your nice 50mm lens is no longer as great for portraiture with the loss of the crop factor, but it's still usable regardless.3) Takes DX-lenses. Yes, it will crop to 10mp and you'll get the same crop factor as on APS-C lenses, but at least your DX lenses still work on this full frame camera.If you've been around since the D70, jumped to the D300, and are now looking at the D600, I would say just go for it- the full frame advantage is amazing. Sure people say for an extra $1000, you could have a D800, but for that amount, you could buy a pretty nice 85mm f/1.8 portrait lens to go with your new D600 too.Just the image quality at high ISOs and wider angle alone are worth it for me. However, as a portrait/event/wedding photographer, low-light applications are important to me. If you're more a sports/telephoto type person, perhaps the 1.5x crop factor for aps-c cameras may be more to your liking. And if you just want to take random shots here and there, I think the D600 may be overkill while the D7000 may be just fine for you.Compared to the Canon 6D? Apparently its center AF point focuses down to -3eV, so it may be great in low light capabilities. I couldn't care less for the GPS and wifi functionality of the 6D. I'm sure image quality on it is great though. Compared to the similarly priced 5dMK2? That's a tough call. If you're already invested in Canon lenses, maybe stick with Canon (I haven't had a chance to check the D600's video, but apparently Canon's is better).It really all depends on what your needs are as a photographer- don't blindly follow the Nikon-is-best-no-Canon-is-best arguments and get the camera for the shooting conditions YOU need. As for me? No regrets on the D600- after shooting a wedding all day, I didn't even reach for my old D300 once. 4 stars for the above listed cons, but I'm definitely keeping my D600 for the long run.UPDATED: 12/10/12 I've been shooting with this camera for over two months now and I'd just like to update a few things after using it for a while.1) AF- The w
Скромный эксперт
12.01.2014
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
I am very disappointed with the way NIKON has handled this entire D600 fiasco. I can best alert you against this camera by copying the words from a recent review. These are not my words but serve as a good guide. I hope NIKON will read this and be very ashamed. I was very lucky because I was able to return the entire D600 camera kit to Costco after I pleaded with them and showed them how this camera is defective and NIKON will not face up to it and instead kicked the consumer in the gut by correcting the problem with the introduction of D610, instead of doing the morally ethical thing of recalling the D600s. I too noticed the oil and dirt spots on my pictures. The following is taken from[...] :Here's a quote from a Nikon dealer:"Nikon has devalued our remaining new [D600] inventory and will make it almost impossible for us to sell it off short of taking big losses. We're already trying to move our current inventory by taking a $100 hit on the profit side and I don't think that's going to be enough. If anyone thinks I'm ordering new D610's today (short of specific order requests) they're nuts."Now let's look at things from a well-informed prospective customer viewpoint: Choice 1: a D600 that might or might not have a shutter issue Choice 2: a D610 that fixes the shutter issue (to assume otherwise would also be to assume that Nikon is totally incompetent, in which case see Choice 3 ;~) Choice 3: buy a Canon 6D Rumored Choice 4: Sony and Pentax introducing competitive full frame camerasWhat I fail to understand is Nikon's behavior here. They have done the following by staying quiet about the D600 issues and trying to get around them by doing a sleight of hand with the D610: Eroded key customer confidence Devalued a product by their actions, which leads to: Lowered their product margins Added another lingering inventory problem, which also leads to lower profit marginsCoupled with all the repair costs that the D600 triggered, how can Nikon's response be the right answer to the problem? In retrospect, the proper solution was to recall all D600's and examine them for defective shutters. If found, replace it and charge the cost of that replacement to their shutter supplier. That kind of response should have: Increased key customer confidence Not devalued the product Lowered their product margins (cost of shipping cameras, inspecting them) Not created a lingering inventory problem or the need for another productBut here's another new problem I'm seeing in my In Box. Consider this quote: "My D600 is coming up on end of warranty. I'm not a heavy user so I'm not sure if my camera has the problem. It seems like it needs more cleaning than I expected. What happens when my warranty expires? Will Nikon still replace my shutter for free if it's defective?"Nikon is, as usual, will likely remain silent on such questions, which isn't going to increase customer confidence. Basically, I don't think the cycle here has been broken; it's been extended.Oct 8, 2013, 3:54 AMŠ Thom Hogan 2013 / All Rights Reserved bythom.com @bythom #bythom
Скромный эксперт
13.01.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I have been using d600 for some months now and each time I pick it up I am amazed how well balanced this camera is. I had read about some of the risks from this forum but I still bought the d600 because so many things seemed just right with this camera. Besides, a new Nikon comes with a 1 year manufacturer's warranty and for a modest amount you can extend the warranty if you have causes for concern.I used to be an an avid SLR user (canon and Olympus om-4 Ti) from film days and until I got the d600 I later gravitated to the 'light' cameras of our digital era. So the stunning surprise with d600 for me was its ergonomics -- from your knapsack it simply lands into your hands so well, somehow you don't feel the need for any tripod, and the controls are all in the right place, and the viewfinder ... well, brings back to the mystique of looking through a Nikon viewfinder from the film days.I started with the auto modes initially and the exposure accuracy often makes you a smile. Nevertheless I go mostly manual at this point -- the sheer fun of photography is back, that's how I characterize the d600 now. So much useful information is available to help make decisions during manual exposures. This a reminder of the mystery of camera building, how challenging it is to balance so many details such as cost, form, function, what a photographer is really after at the moment of releasing the shutter, etc. etc. but here it is -- once in a blue moon, a machine that is work of art, a celebration of the camera builder's art.
Скромный эксперт
03.01.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
First off, if the D600 did not have the dust issue getting on the sensor from the dust that is produced when the bottom of the mirror mechanism scrapes when it's flipped up, I would rate this 5 stars.With that said, I will explain why I love this camera aside from the defect that Nikon decides to not address.It is as good, if not better than the D800 for several reasons:- 5.5 FPS vs. 4 FPS (6 for D800 if you want to spend another $300 on the grip)- Less noise at higher ISO (more megapixels on the D800 means noisier pictures when ISO is jacked up... also a reason why the D700 has better high-iso performance than the D600 and D800)- U1 and U2 modes (if you shoot weddings with indoor/outdoor in incandescent/outdoor, can preset and save the correct temperature for white balance beforehand, making your life A LOT easier for events).- Cheaper by a thousand. Can spend that thousand on a grip, flash, and Hoya polarizing filter. Or whatever else.The pictures it takes are amazingly sharp, and it offering 2x SD card slots is an advantage over the more expensive SD+CF combination in the D800 as SD cards are significantly cheaper than the CF cards.The camera clearly has weight, but it does not balance too well with heavier lenses such as the 24mm 1.4G or 24-70mm 2.8G (weight was fairly nicely balances with my 85mm 1.4G, however). I like how the size was just about right, just not the weight.There's a Fn button on the front that's accessible with your right ring finger, or right pinky, but poorly placed as it is hard to reach. The dials offer great on-the-fly adjustment to ISO (I shoot mostly in Aperture), so if you outgrew your DX, it's a plus.Drawbacks aside from the dust issue is that the fastest shutter speed is only 1/4000 (compared to 1/8000 in D700, D800, etc.), good but not amazing ISO performance (very good comparable to the D3s up to 6400)--but that is to be expected with 24.3 MP.Wish the menu could be a bit easier to customize (hint* hint*, Nikon--go model it after Sony's, hint*)Overall, a keeper and you won't regret buying one if it doesn't have the dust issue.My D600 serial was 3014xxx. For those purchasing the D600, you will only start noticing the scraping of the black finishing on the bottom of the mirror mechanism after about 1000-15000 actuations. If you shoot with a small aperture (like 1.4 to 1.8) a lot, you won't notice the dust accumulation, but it's there. Way to solve it or overcome it is to wet clean (voids warranty, so don't do it unless you are completely sure of yourself) every 2 thousand shots or so until the problem goes away (after it scrapes all the black finishing off, nothing left to scrape), or to send it to Nikon to service.
Скромный эксперт
08.12.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
I've bought this kit about a month ago and have been loving it. I don't use the bag it's too big for my liking but it seems like its decent quality. Here are the pros and cons I've found for the camera first then the lens.D600Pros- this is my first full frame camera and coming from a DX sensor i see the pics contain a lot more detail and under exposed images can be brightened up a lot and still contain a ton of detail.No auto focus issues with my camera. Tested the lens and camera and they both focused well.It's a little bigger than the D7000 but it only took me a day of shooting to control everything with my eye on the viewfinder like I do with my D7000Battery life is still good. A little worst than the D7000 but only slightly noticeable.Cons- I hate the autofocus points. Their very close together and I like to shoot more in the corners. You must use the recomposing technique with this camera. All those auto focus points are pretty much useless. They could have gotten the same job done with 5 or 9 points.I wish it had 3 user programmable settings instead of two. I really only use M, U1 and U2. A and S come in handy but that Scene setting should be a U3. Also, I don't like how you have to push the middle button down before you can turn the knob to change the settings. My D7000 didn't have that button and I never had a problem with my camera modes changing when I didn't want them to.That's all the flaws I can think of with the body so on to the lens.28-300mm LensPros- I use my sharper fixed lenses under predictable conditions, but there is no better lens for the unpredictable. I wanted this for my general use walking lens. Nothing more, so even though the focal length overlaps all my lenses. I doesnt replace any of them. I take this lens with me in the woods where you never know what you're going to see but when you see it the right lens better be on your camera. This lens is going to let you get a great shot under most conditions. I can be doing a landscape shot, then when that hawk lands on a branch near me I can zoom in and get the shot before it flys off. I've missed a lot of great shots because I was trying to change lenses but now it rarely happens.Cons- well it's decently sharp and vivid but it's not gonna win awards for any of that stuff. Nikon makes a lot of money off lenses so even if they could they would never make a lens that was great at everything. Again, I use my fixed lenses when I'm doing the predictable stuff like portraits or indoor work or low light work because their better lenses for that job. I can't really fault this lens for not being good at stuff it's not supposed to be good at.
Скромный эксперт
26.11.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Having wanted to migrate to a FX sensor for about a year the release of the D-600 was very well timed for me. The D-800 is an outstanding camera but produces enormous files and requires a 33% greater investment. The D-600 feels solid and produces stunning images. All of the features stemming from the more advanced menu, larger LCD, ISO range, dual SD slots, etc are all improvements over my D-200's.The camera, with the vertical grip, is easily 30% heavier than the comparable D-200.Although rated at 5 fps I am finding the D-600 to fire faster than my D-200's did (and are rated the same). The shutter actuator is also more sensitive in continuous shooting mode- it's common to fire three or four when you wanted two or three, but that may just need time for me to learn the new body's feel.Having said that there are a few really annoying quirks:(1) To change the ISO or White Balance you have an external button on the bottom of the back of the camera, or by accessing the menu. Try using this button with a 400mm lens attached- can't be done. The button is really in an awkward location.(2) The button to activate Live View is too close to where your thumb naturally falls holding the camera. It is easily activated by accident. Plus to properly use Live View Nikon suggests using a eyepiece cover (included with the camera) to eliminate stray light that might affect exposure. But there is no convenient place to store this small item and you have to remove the current eyepiece cover... and out it in your pocket (the solid cover does have a clip for your strap, if you use the narrow Nikon straps but will likely fall off). Why not offer an internal eyepiece shutter (eg: film cameras in the 60's).(3) Autofocus operates very differently and I am still experimenting to find the best settings for my needs. Many of my initial test shots are locking on backgrounds and not the subject in moving action.(4) Adobe Lightroom cannot yet process D-600 files. And while using Nikon ViewNX does allow you to convert to other formats it does not handle the post production workflow that LR does. Adobe is expected to have this addressed by the end of the year.None the less the still and video image quality is outstanding and I continue to be amazed at how sharp cropped images appear.One other large improvement is with the external battery/vertical grip (sold as an option). The vertical grip for the D-200 was flimsy, the doors and battery clips easily broke. This unit is solid and has a completely different battery housing process.Thus far I am extremely pleased with the D-600 and as I become for comfortable with it in use feel confident my few gripes will vanish.
Скромный эксперт
23.09.2012
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
After exactly 250 shots, my D600 completely shut down. No power, no response to anything.Up until that point (first 3 days with it), it was awesome. The pictures were fantastic, editing the RAW images was fine using ViewNX2 that came with it. I did have to uninstall my older version of ViewNX2 to get it to work. But no real issues there.The video was outstanding as well. Love the mic input.But none of that really matters when it stops working. The battery is fully charged, it is just behaving as though it has no power.I was so excited to receive this camera. This is just so darn disappointing.***UPDATE***New D600 arrived yesterday (Tuesday). After letting the battery get a full charge, it appears to be working fine. I tested the non-working D600 just to see if it was a faulty battery, and it was not. The original D600 still showed no signs of life even with the new battery that was powering a working D600. So The issue does appear to be in the camera.Amazon's purchase and return experience has been fantastic, and deserves mention. When I pre-ordered it they sent me an email from a "camera concierge", letting me know that someone was going to be watching my order and making sure it was delivered on time. It was delivered on the date they said it would when I pre-ordered. So Sunday morning, I sent them an email explaining the failure on Saturday night. I received a call back from them a few hours later. I explained the issue, and after no longer than a 5 minute phone call, Amazon had my replacement on the way. It arrived on Tuesday (yesterday), and UPS will pick up the non-working D600 at my house on Wednesday (today). I don't often return things, but I have to say this is probably the best exchange experience I've had so far. Amazon made this very easy for me. So thank you to them. They deserve 5 stars.*** Second Update ***My replacement D600 started having memory card issues after 50 or so shots, it read -E- for the memory card in slot one, I popped out the card, and popped it back in and it worked fine for another hundred or so shots. This happened 4 times, then stopped happening and it worked fine for about 500 shots after that. There were no issues with slot 2. When I swapped cards between slot and 2, the issue stayed with slot 1. If it were a memory card issue, I would have expected to see that error appear for slot 2 after a while, but it never did.This combined with my previous experience has me very concerned about the quality of this camera. I returned it today. Once again, Amazon was great, UPS picked up the camera from my house today, and Amazon will issue a full refund.
Показаны отзывы 1-8 из 511.
Как менялась цена на Nikon D600 Body
Характеристики Nikon D600 Body
Информация о характеристиках носит справочный характер.
Перед покупкой уточняйте характеристики и комплектацию товара у продавца
Обзоры и руководства на Nikon D600 Body
Альтернативы с более высокой оценкой
Wizemart © 2026.
Рекомендательная система по умному выбору товаров по отзывам и рейтингам
