Фотоаппарат Nikon D5200 Body — подробный обзор, плюсы и минусы на основе 256 отзывов
⚡ Nikon D5200 — профессиональное качество изображения в любительском пластиковом корпусе.
✅ Стоит покупать, если вам нужно максимально возможное качество картинки без переплаты за полноценный «про»-корпус.
❌ Лучше избегать, если для вас принципиально важны быстрый прямой доступ к настройкам, работа с оптикой без встроенного мотора или ультимативная живучесть батареи.
Обзор реального опыта использования Nikon D5200 Body - анализ 256 отзывов
📸 Сенсор и качество изображения: главная причина купить эту камеру
Если отбросить в сторону все разговоры о маркетинге и мегапиксельной гонке, 24-мегапиксельная матрица этой камеры — это просто бомба для своего сегмента. Слухи о том, что тут стоит Toshiba-сенсор, а не Sony, ходят не просто так: он реально выдает картинку, которая визуально выглядит дороже. Детализация на уровне 6000x4000 точек с цветовой глубиной 24.2 бита и запасом динамического диапазона более 13 ступеней позволяет тянуть тени в RAW так, как и не снилось прямому конкуренту вроде Canon EOS 60D с его 18 Мп. Разница заметна, когда кадрируешь снимок или готовишь файл для крупноформатной печати — фрагмент можно вырезать, растянуть, и он всё равно останется резким. Шумы на ISO 1600 практически незаметны, а значения вплоть до ISO 3200 остаются полностью рабочими без критичной потери текстуры кожи или мелких деталей. Честно говоря, это тот редкий случай, когда любительская камера по качеству статичной картинки вгрызается в территорию старших моделей, включая более дорогой Nikon D7100. Вывод: Если вы охотитесь за максимальной детализацией и широким динамическим диапазоном в бюджете до 30 тысяч рублей, этот аппарат — бескомпромиссный лидер по голой математике пикселя. Картинка на голову выше всего, что есть у Canon в этом ценовом сегменте.
🕹️ Эргономика и управление: вот тут начинаются нюансы
Когда берешь D5200 в руки после Nikon D7000 или любого полноразмерного Canon, сразу чувствуешь подвох. Это легкий, почти невесомый пластик. Мизинцу на рукоятке держаться не за что. Качество сборки вызывает смешанные чувства: корпус ощущается хлипким, а заявленный производителем «бронзовый» окрас на деле оказывается глянцевым, а не матовым, как на рендерах. Но главный косяк — идеология управления. Тут нет монохромного дисплея сверху, а все настройки вбиты в меню на главном экране. Чтобы сменить ISO, нужно либо зажимать неудобную клавишу Fn и крутить колесо, либо лезть в дебри быстрого меню. Это сильно контрастирует с профессиональными тушками, где всё на своих кнопках. Новичкам будет проще: графический интерфейс Info красивый и наглядный, он визуально показывает суть экспозиции. Но если вы переходите с двухдисковых камер, постоянное лазание по меню начнет раздражать уже на второй день съемки. Зато спасением становится очень детальная встроенная справка: нажал кнопку «?», и аппарат на пальцах объясняет, что делает та или иная функция. Вывод: Это классический «любитель» в плане управления. Получить доступ к частым настройкам быстро можно — но только после мышечной памяти и привыкания. Для студийной работы или жанровой съемки на скорость не самый удобный вариант; он скорее про вдумчивое творчество.
🎯 Автофокус и скорость работы: 39 точек, которые работают с оговорками
Система из 39 точек фокусировки с 9 крестовыми сенсорами перекочевала сюда прямиком со старшего Nikon D7000, и это реально спасает камеру. По меркам класса это прорыв, потому что прямой конкурент в лице Canon EOS 700D (Rebel T5i) довольствуется лишь 9 точками и одной крестовой. При съемке через оптический видоискатель наводка происходит очень цепко и уверенно. Камера отлично ведет объект в движении, и на средних светосильных стеклах вы будете получать резкие кадры бегущих детей или домашних животных без проблем. Однако есть ложка дегтя. Первое: работает это счастье только в видоискателе. В режиме Live View камера переключается на медленный контрастный автофокус, и снять видео с непрерывной быстрой фокусировкой становится почти невозможно — она «дышит» и рыскает по экспозиции. Второе: отсутствие встроенного «мотора-отвертки» в байонете аукнется, если у вас завалялись старые недорогие фиксы от Nikon без встроенной фокусировки (AF-D). Они здесь превратятся в полностью мануальные. Серийная съемка держит стабильные 5 кадров в секунду — достаточно для динамичных сюжетов, если вы не репортажник мирового уровня. Вывод: Вы получаете продвинутую систему фокусировки от полупрофессиональных камер, которая молниеносна ровно до того момента, пока вы не включите Live View. Это все еще камера для фото, а не для следящего автофокуса на видео.
🎬 Видеовозможности и их ограничения: картинка прекрасна, но есть подводные камни
Качество Full HD видео с этой матрицы феноменальное. Прохождение теста на цвет и динамический диапазон позволяет снимать ролики с киношной картинкой за очень скромные деньги. Это тот случай, когда видео визуально переигрывает по детализации даже прославленные Canon EOS 5D Mark II. Можно спокойно подключить внешний рекордер по чистому выходу HDMI и писать поток без сжатия. Но на практике бытового использования сразу вылезают болячки. Во-первых, проблема «горящих» пикселей при видеозаписи: это не единичный случай, а массовое явление. Причем Nikon по гарантии часто отказывается признавать это браком, ссылаясь на то, что «это не видеокамера». Во-вторых, встроенный микрофон нещадно пишет все шумы — от ветра до звуков работы автофокуса и скрежета колесика. Режим 1080i дает не самый приятный эффект стробирования, поэтому стоит снимать в 1080p. Эффект роллинг-шаттера («желе» при движении) тоже очень заметен, так что снимать с рук на ходу — гиблое дело. При этом сам функционал видео в меню и легкость переключения на запись кнопкой возле затвора (да, очень неудобной и нащупываемой вслепую) радуют. Вывод: Как инструмент для вдумчивой художественной видеосъемки со штатива и внешним звуком это находка. Но быстро достать из сумки и снять «как на телефон» без брака и мусора на аудиодорожке не получится.
🆚 Топ-5 альтернатив: Nikon D5200 vs конкуренты
В ценовом сегменте «кропнутых зеркалок для продвинутых любителей» выбора хватает, но ключевой параметр борьбы — компромисс между качеством матрицы, эргономикой и функционалом. D5200 делает огромный акцент на первое, экономя на втором.
| Модель | Матрица (Мп / ISO) | Автофокус и управление | Корпус и экран | Вердикт |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canon EOS 60D | 18 Мп / до 6400 | 9 точек (все крестовые), двухдисковое управление, верхний дисплей | Магниевый скелет, поворотный экран, мощная батарея | ✅ Canon 60D: проигрывает по детализации и динамическому диапазону, зато предлагает куда более мужскую и удобную хватку — съемка станет быстрее и комфортнее, хотя файлы в RAW не растянутся так же хорошо. |
| Nikon D7000 | 16 Мп / до 6400 | 39 точек, управление как у старших «про», встроенный мотор фокусировки | Магниевый корпус, защита от пыли и влаги, фиксированный экран | ⚖️ Nikon D7000: старый, но полупрофессиональный металл — вы получаете «отвертку», влагозащиту и кучу кнопок, однако разрешение заметно ниже, и видеорежим устаревший. |
| Sony SLT-A77 | 24 Мп / до 16000 | 19 точек, экстремально быстрый фазовый АФ по всему полю в Live View и видео | Магниевый корпус, поворотный экран, верхний дисплей, встроенный стабилизатор | ✅ Sony SLT-A77: видеографам стоит смотреть сюда — стабилизатор на матрице и непрерывный быстрый фокус при записи просто уделают D5200, но сама картинка чуть более цифровая и шумная. |
| Canon EOS 700D | 18 Мп / до 6400 | 9 точек (1 крестовая), сенсорный экран с поворотным механизмом | Пластик, поворотный тачскрин, STM-объективы в ките для тихой фокусировки | ❌ Canon EOS 700D: сильно проигрывает по характеристикам матрицы и мертвой хватке автофокуса, но для новичка он дружелюбнее благодаря тач-интерфейсу и плавной фокусировке на видео. |
| Nikon D5300 | 24 Мп (без OLPF) / до 12800 | 39 точек, процессор Expeed 4, встроенные Wi-Fi и GPS | Пластик, поворотный экран, чуть больше и легче предшественника | ⚖️ Nikon D5300: прямой наследник с чуть более резкой картинкой без фильтра, нормальным Wi-Fi и лучшим видео, но всё тем же пластиком и отсутствием мотора. |
Если для вас на первом месте стоит характер картинки, D5200 и D5300 имеют самый высокий потолок качества на этом отрезке цен. Canon 60D и Sony SLT-A77 — это про ухватистую, взрослую работу и видеовозможности без доработок напильником. D7000 выглядит компромиссно по управлению, но его сенсор уже морально стар. Камера резко выделяется и хороша именно для тех, кто готов возиться с обработкой и мириться с дешевым пластиком ради топового результата в пикселях.
👍Почему стоит купить Nikon D5200 Body - Преимущества по отзывам пользователей
- Высокое качество изображения с детальной матрицей 24 МП:
- Резкие снимки с точной цветопередачей и широким динамическим диапазоном, позволяют крупные отпечатки до 13x20 дюймов без потери качества.
- Отличная работа в низком освещении: четкие фото уличных фонарей ночью с кропом без шума.
- RAW (.NEF) и JPEG с 24-битной глубиной цвета, богатыми тонами; превосходит Canon 6D по детализации в бюджете до $2k.
- Быстрый и точный автофокус с 39 точками (9 кросс-типа):
- Эффективно захватывает движущиеся объекты: собаку с мячом на 1/1600 с, птиц, спорт; лучше D3200 и на уровне D7000.
- Работает в темноте благодаря ИК-лучу; совместим с AF-S объективами как 70-200, 18-200.
- Трекинг для видео и фото, включая макро с микро-объективами.
- Поворотный ЖК-экран 921k точек:
- Удобен для видео, селфи, низких/высоких углов; показывает настройки ISO, выдержку, диафрагму.
- Полезен в путешествиях, на яхте, для обзора плеча; лучше фиксированного экрана D7000.
- Низкий шум на высоких ISO до 3200:
- Чистые снимки при ISO 1200-3200 в помещении без вспышки; лучше Canon XSi, Sony A65/A77.
- Авто-ISO с ограничениями; ISO 1600 почти как ISO 200.
- Компактность и легкость корпуса:
- Легче D7000/D300 (675г с батарейкой); удобен для поездок, Atlantic crossing с 18-200 VR.
- Хорошо лежит в руке, несмотря на пластик; мобильен для новичков и женщин.
- Долгая автономность батареи для фото:
- До 500-1000 снимков на заряд; 500+ в тестовом режиме.
- Качественное Full HD видео:
- 1080p/60i/30p с хорошим AF; чистый HDMI-выход для внешней записи; лучше Canon T4i по качеству.
- Множество функций и эффектов:
- HDR в камере, множественная экспозиция, Picture Control, встроенная справка; авто-браккетинг для ландшафтов.
👎О чем стоит задуматься перед покупкой - Недостатки по отзывам пользователей
- Неинтуитивное меню и управление:
- Хаотичная организация, нет отдельных кнопок для ISO/диафрагмы (нужно Fn+колесо); сбивает экспокоррекцию до +4.5.
- Требует мануала; хуже Canon/Sony по удобству, особенно для видео/фото переключения.
- Сброс таймера/ HDR после кадра; RAW+эффекты требуют смены на JPEG.
- Горящие/светящиеся пиксели на матрице:
- Появляются через 6 мес., видны на фото/видео; Nikon не признает дефектом (не "видеокамера").
- Массово на форумах; отказ в ремонте по гарантии.
- Короткая жизнь батареи при видео/Live View:
- <100 снимков + 3 мин видео; садится за 30 мин записи; требует доп. батарей/грипа.
- Пластиковый корпус и эргономика:
- Ощущение дешевизны, глянцевое покрытие (не матовое); хлипкая крышка батареи/карты.
- Неудобный хват, утопленные кнопки; хуже D300/D90 для больших рук.
- Нет мотора AF в корпусе:
- Требуются AF-S/AF-I объективы; старые AF/D только вручную; не все Tamron работают.
- Медленный AF в Live View и видео:
- Контрастный AF вместо фазового; "желе" от rolling shutter, шум ветра в микрофоне.
- Не для быстрого трекинга (летучие рыбы, музыка).
- Шумы и ограничения на высоких ISO >3200:
- Шум после 3200; 24MP требует штатива/светосилы во избежание смазывания.
- Пыль и мелкие дефекты:
- Пыль в видоискателе через 3 дня; back/front focus у некоторых экземпляров.
*Плюсы и минусы, которые пользователи называют чаще всего на основе практического опыта использования.
256 отзывов пользователей о Nikon D5200 Body
Пользовались
Nikon D5200 Body?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Скромный эксперт
14.05.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Before reading my review you should know this one crucial detail. Until I took a chance and bought this camera, I've only ever used Canons. I was actually looking to get a Canon 6D, then I checked out the specs, compared images and videos between the 6D and so many other cameras, and I went with the Nikon D5200 in the end. It really does capture an image with a slightly higher quality. It's subtle but significant. In terms of overall image quality alone, the only real advantage the Canon 6D has over the Nikon D5200 is the full-frame sensor's resolution, which does give you about 2x sensitivity to light as well. But full-frame DSLRs aren't right for everyone, and they incur extra expenses for more specific lenses as well.If you're after image-quality, video-quality, versatility, and affordability, I'd say this is the best DSLR you can get for under $1k USD. In fact, hands down, I truly believe this DSLR even has the best quality image you can get for under $2k USD.Again, I'm not a fanboy of Nikon or Canon or Sony or Pentax or anything. I've used a Toshiba VHS camcorder, a Sony point-and-shoot, a Panasonic Mini-DV camcorder, a Canon DSLR, a Kodak disposable, and anything else that worked well and made sense... I don't care what the brand is or how expensive or "pro" it is. All I care about it is: How good is the image quality, and is it designed well enough to easily master using it? The second point I can throw out the window if the image quality is that much better than it's competitors, but that isn't the case here either. It's a great camera all aroundPROS:1.5x crop sensor Vs. Canon's 1.6x (very close to a 35mm cinema camera crop-factor)6000 x 4000 resolution with 15.3 ľm˛ pixel size (Image is sharp, colors are detailed and very accurate!)921k dot LCD resolution which is more than you even need for the screen size.Shoots .NEF RAW... (Get the free plugin from Adobe if you use Photoshop or Lightroom)Battery lasts a very long time when not shooting (about 500 shots when shooting)30 second to 1/4000 of a second exposure range.Discrete built-in flash with multiple modes / Shoe for external flash24.2 bit color depth, 13.9 EV Dynamic range (tones are detailed, colors are rich and vivid!ISO can go up to 1200 in almost any scenario before getting noisyCompatible with almost all Nikon LensesHas a built-in help system, accessible on the fly, for every single feature and setting!Shoots HDR precomposed in camera or by bracketing multiple exposures to combine later.This baby can capture a crisp and beautiful image! The resolution is large enough, the dynamic range and color depth are wide enough, and the ISO efficiency is so good, I can take a low-light photo of a streetlamp at night, crop out a third of the image, blow it up to the original's size, and still have a crisp, clear, vivid, and noiseless image that I could print at 13x20 inches and hang on a wall, or sell at a gallery. The noise is so low, and the images are so sharp that you could easily blow up an un-cropped image to twice the captured size (26x40 inches) and it would still look fantastic.I was taken aback when I took this little guy out for it's first night shoot. Of course, a little know-how and some trial and error plays a role, but I was amazed by how accurately this sensor represents colors. I took a picture of some flowers in the immediate foreground against a backdrop of a park in the midground and a downtown strip in the far distance. Despite the street lighting, the moonlight, the neon signs, and all the little details in the store fronts, cars, trees, grass, benches, cobblestone walkway, and the telephone poll about a mile away... The picture I took was a spitting image of what I saw with my own eyes. Maybe even a little better. From the flowers in the foreground to the telephone poll far away, everything looked clean and clear and as it was in life. I was about 50 yards away from the storefronts with a 35mm lens, and I could still make out license plates in the photo. If I had focused to infinity, I probably could have made out the plates from even further away. Just as an example! That's not a regular habit or a hobby of mine. hahaha...CONS:Definitely not 100% intuitive menu settings... Read the manual before using to avoid possible confusion.ISO does not have it's own button/dial, however it's very easy to get used to using the "function" button for this.Menu system works well, but organization feels a bit chaotic and crammed in certain menu tabs.Nikon doesn't distinguish much between photography and videography. READ MANUAL to get familiar with all settings!Non-CPU manual lenses can only be used in Manual Mode. Would be nice to at least have auto ISO/Exposure as an option.The (BRONZE) paint job is not a matte finish like it looks in every photo you see. It's a glossy finish like the red version.PART 2 ~ THE LENSE:The Kit lens feels a little cheap compared more expensive lenses, but it actually performs very well. I used it a couple times an
Скромный эксперт
04.08.2013
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Updated November 25, 2013Professional camera reviewer Ken Rockwell suggests that the 5200 body for about $800 can do mostly everything the can be done by the D600 $2,000 body so why pay the difference for some extra dials and buttons? I followed his advice and bought the D5200 and will keep it, but if a good used D600 body were offered for sale for $1,000 I'd gladly swap. While I realize the camera can do a lot, the lack of easy control buttons and extra modes bugs me. It's a downsizing I know, but to have to hold down one button while activating another ... not intuitive after shooting for years with a larger more expensive D300. Example: somewhere along the line I was trying to adjust the aperture in A mode and apparently wound up sending the exposure compensator to +4.5, thus way over exposing my shots beyond any use. This would not have happened with the additional dials and buttons on the more professional Nikon series. (My dog was happy to fetch another ball for another test.)The camera can indeed take great images. After resetting the exposure compensator to zero I shot images of my dog running back with a ball. In Aperture mode with aperture set at f4 the auto exposure system chose a 1/1,600 speed and the auto focus worked well; the resulting image was very sharp, even for the eyes of the dog and the marks on the tennis ball in his mouth.As another reviewer noted, this camera's auto focus feature works with some, but not all, Nikon auto focus lenses. For example, it works with my AF-S 70-200 and 18-200 lenses, but not with a 50mm Nikon auto focus AF lens nor with a Tamron auto focus lens that I own. That's understandable and should not be a problem for people buying new lenses. Just be aware.This might be a good starter camera for someone who thinks he or she might grow into doing more creative photography than normally done with a simple point and shoot camera.The D5200 might also be a relatively inexpensive camera body for someone wanting to do fast moving sports photography; I've not tested the fast tracking feature, but it sounds great and the large number of megapixels should allow wider angle photos. I.e., rather than zoom in on a galloping horse and perhaps later discover the nose is missing, one could take a wider photo of the horse and background to be sure all of the horse is in the photo and then in editing crop out the unwanted parts and still have a high resolution image of the entire horse. To me that's a fairly significant advantage.The D5200 seems to me a great technological achievement in a compact plastic size. On the other hand, for about $1,000 for the D5200 and a compatible lens, perhaps most consumers (particularly those who won't be wanting to use various lenses)could do as well with a lower cost, more pocket size camera, while photographers who are used to a larger size camera with controls we can use without looking may find themselves a bit frustrated.It's a matter of fit between the buyer and the camera. Good luck and have fun._______Nov 25 2013 I just returned from a month long trip on a large sailboat crossing the Atlantic Ocean. Because weight and size were concerns in traveling, after debating I took only my D5200 with only my Nikon 18-200 VR lens.This worked well! I used the weight saving to take my older larger laptop with my familiar LR and PS software; accessing the "cloud" was mostly not possible / practical and I was glad I'd made this choice.I found the video mode surprisingly useful. When I was at the helm of the huge sailboat, the person to whom I passed my D5200 camera could not quickly use it to shoot photos, so I put it in video mode and handed it back to her. The video mode worked well in full automatic, allowing anyone who can point and shoot to create good memories. The built in microphone picked up some wind noise, but that's to be expected on the deck of a moving sailboat.With days at sea, I began playing with the video and to push the limits. I tried videoing flying fish which sometimes skimmed above the waves, which proved too difficult for the camera's autofocusing(at least in my hands). However that was asking a lot - with the photographer sailing forward while also moving up and down from sideways swells, the background consisting entirely of waves in motion, and airborne fish briefly skimming in a different direction! In another unfair test, I got acceptable results: Others on the boat had created a slideshow on a laptop using contributed photos and were attempting to record music to match the images. I essentially had my D5200 look over their shoulders to video the laptop images while also capturing the music being played. I instead of a tripod I used a bunch of masking tape to tape my camera to a brass rail to keep it stable relative to the subject (both gently rolling sideways at the same rate). In this interior setting we would want the aperture to remain constant because only the music is changing. However, the ima
Скромный эксперт
19.02.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Using a DSL is allot different than a point-n-shoot camera. It's a different mentality and user experience.Think of the DSR as a platform, for different lenses. In order to take advantage of its full potential, you need different lenses to attach to the platform body.The point and shoot has those built in. But, once you attach the correct lens to a DSR, then its magic will come out. It is a very precise platform, when attached to the correct lens, where as a P'n'S is not.I send mine back...they are coming out with a d7100, with better specs."Nikon has revealed a new enthusiast-level flagship DX-format camera, the 24.1-megapixel Nikon D7100. The much-awaited update to the aging D7000 has a professional-level 51-point AF system, and continuous full resolution shooting at 6 fps. Notably, the camera also does away with the optical low pass filter - meaning it should be able to capture sharper detail than cameras with a similar resolution.The Nikon D7100 has been given a specially designed DX-format (APS-C) 24.1-megapixel CMOS sensor (so not the same one employed in the D5200) which doesn't use the traditional optical low pass (anti-aliasing) filter found in most cameras. Nikon says this means it can produce sharper images that make the most of its resolution ... and presumably the firm is confident users won't suffer (too much) in terms of moiré and aliasing artifacts.Autofocus is another area where Nikon has significantly improved the camera. The D7100 uses the Nikon Advanced Multi-CAM 3500DX autofocus sensor module, and employs the same algorithm used in the Nikon D4. This gives what Nikon describes as "professional-level performance" from the 51 focus points (15 cross-type sensors), including speedy subject acquisition, and phase-detection AF down to a minimum luminance of -2 EV (really dark conditions).Using an EXPEED 3 image processor, the new camera has an ISO sensitivity of 100-6400 (expandable to 25600) and can shoot full resolution images at a not-too-shabby 6 fps, though the buffer capacity is only good for six frames in full 14-bit RAW (or 33 frames in JPEG fine and large).Interestingly, Nikon has also introduced a new 1.3x crop function which crops images, giving an extra telephoto effect - and taking it to about double the 35mm-format focal length. This is likely to be welcomed by sports and wildlife shooters, who will also benefit from the way focus points cover a wider area of the cropped frame ... and the increase in continuous shooting speed, which goes up to 7 fps. Cropped images are 15.4 megapixelsOn the video side of things there's Full HD (1920 x 1080) recording at frame rates of up to 60i/50i and 30p/25p/24p. Dropping the resolution to 1280 x 720 gives users the option of 60p recording. Video recording can be based on the full DX-format or using the 1.3x crop (both in an aspect ratio of 16:9). While there's a stereo microphone, videographers will also be pleased to see an external microphone jack and headphone connector.There's a 3.2-inch LCD on the rear with 1,229k dots, while the 100 percent coverage optical viewfinder has been given an OLED display (for the information under the image) which is said to be very bright and have low power consumption.Measuring 5.3 x 4.2 x 3 inches (135.5 x 106.5 x 76 mm) and weighing 23.8 ounces (675 g) the D7100 features magnesium alloy top and rear covers in a durable body which is dust, weather and drop resistant. For those who prefer their cameras with a vertical grip, Nikon has also introduced the MB-D15, which adds the usual shutter-release button, AE/AF lock button, multi selector, and command dials. It can be powered either by six AA batteries or the standard D7100 batteryThough there's no built-in wireless capabilities, the Nikon D7100 is compatible with the optional WU-1a Mobile Adapter which allows users to transmit images wirelessly to an iOS or Android device, or to remotely control the camera.While the numbering of the Nikon D7100 shows it's an update to the D7000, it's also possibly the closest thing the D300s is going to get to a replacement. Nikon is choosing to refer to it as the "flagship of Nikon's DX-format HD-SLR lineup" and it's hard to see what the fabled D400 could add ... other than a larger full-metal body and faster continuous shooting with a bigger buffer.The Nikon D7100 will sell for US$1,200 body-only when it goes on sale in March, or $1,600 with the AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR kit lens."I mean for $300 more, why not get a better one? Coming out soon!
Скромный эксперт
20.01.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
This camera may be the best APS-C in its class so far. After Nikon's quality control issue with the full-frame D600 (sensor oil spot problem), Nikon may be able to win back its trust with this new release, again aimed at enthusiasts and amateur photographers. Being an amateur photographer for years and have invested quite a sum in Sony, Canon and Nikon bodies and lenses, I myself settled with Nikon in personal preference. I would say all three brands got its personality (good and bad), especially with Sony pushing the translucent mirror technology.The D5200 is a step up from the D3200 as an entry to mid-level body. Very solid performance and thank god it does not suffer the fate of the D600. The D5200 produces extremely good quality images just like the D3200. Both the D3200 and D5200 share the 24MP sensor resolution, with the difference being the light sensitivity in high ISO situations. Both cameras are able to produce extremely well results in terms of photo quality. I am usually able to get better image results from the D3200 and D5200 compared with Sony's A65 and A77 in actual use. Sony somehow made the older A55 easier than the A65 and A77 at getting a clean and noise free shot (maybe due to sensor difference). So Nikon wins here, I would say the image quality of the D5200 is as good as the well acclaimed Canon 60D in most cases easily done (with the D5200 at a higher resolution). So the major difference of the D5200 compared with the D3200 is the focus sensor and exposure meter sensor. The D5200 borrows the technology from the bulkier D7000 and presents 39 AF points including 9 cross-type AF points for accuracy and a more precise exposure metering system (D3200 have 11 AF points, 1 cross-type). This is extremely useful in specific situations, such as shooting moving objects or in macro photography. The D3200 performed very well in everyday shooting, but with my 40mm and 60mm Nikon Micro lenses, the AF failed to accurately or effectively focus on very close subjects. The D5200 however is much better, the body focused efficiently on to desired subjects precisely. The focus speed is still mainly dependent on the lens.The swing-out LCD screen is useful in some situations and video shooting, but proves less useful to me. And keep in mind when using live-view, the camera no longer uses the phase-detection AF sensors, but rather switches to use contrast AF, which utilizes your APS-C image sensor and the CPU (less accurate and slower AF in most cases).The D5200 is not designed to be weatherproof, but it will survive a short time of mist and a few droplets. Anything more may just end up killing the camera. The battery life is very good for photos, will last you 1000+ shots on a single charge in most cases while not using live-view. However when you need it for a video project, consider carrying a few extra batteries with you or resort to an external power source.If you are starting out in Nikon or just DSLR in general, buy the 18-55mm Kit, and add on the 55-200mm VR lens (you get $100 discount bundled). The Nikon 55-200mm DX VR is a VERY GOOD lens, you do not want to get it later since you may be paying the full price for a new one. The VR (Nikon's optical vibration reduction) of the 55-200mm will allow you to capture subjects/people at a good wanted distance with extremely well image quality and brilliant background defocus, opens many doors for quality and creativity. The Nikon 55-200mm DX VR is one of the best lenses I have used and also at a very affordable price.The other kit lens offering of the D5200 is the 18-105mm kit. The 18-105mm is not very good and I'm not going to get too much into the details; it generally is not very good in terms of construction for a heavier lens and causes more barrel distortion.For me, how the function buttons are positioned on the D5200 is a little awkward, but for others it may just be a matter of time to get used to. Compared with the D5100, the D5200 is quite a big step-up in terms of crucial internal hardware.
Скромный эксперт
17.06.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Nikon has made some awfully good "Entry Level" Digital SLR cameras over the years. The most recent were the D3100 and The D5100. The main differences between the D3100 & D5100 was the D5100's articulating/brighter LCD and a bracketing feature. The D5100 is about 10% heavier and costs a bit more than the D3100. The D3200, the sucessor to the D3100, was released last year. However the D3200 was arguably a step backward introducing a much higher resolution sensor (24MP) but at the undesirable cost of additional noise at higher ISO settings.The D5200 uses a 24MP sensor like the D3200 (although the sensors seem to be from different sources; the D5200 uses a Toshiba sensor while the D3200 uses a Sony sensor). This time fortunately, the high ISO performance has actually improved. The D5200 body is almost identical to the D5100 camera body including the articulating, high resolution LCD. The LCD screen now highlights settings for ISO sensitivity, Aperture size (F Stop setting) & Shutter speed making these settings very visible even at a glance. The LCD layout is much better (and different) than anything Nikon has previously used. Nikon does not include an LCD on the top of this camera (or on any of their smaller DSLRs) presumably due to physical surface area constraints.The key improvement is image quality. High ISO performance is actually improved despite the 50% increase in megapixels. ISO 1600 is almost indistinguishable from ISO 200. ISO 3200 is very usable (but not really too far beyond that). Automatic White Balance for incandescent lighting, is still not great but has improved somewhat since the D5100 (but still not nearly as good as the older D5000); shooting raw is still really necessary to get the white balance right in artificial lighting (TIP: When shooting indoors, try "Sunny" instead of AWB). ISO settings can be incrementally increased between stops (ie ISO 2000) to help avoid using a higher than necessary ISO setting..JPGs are a little soft even after making in-camera adjustments; Shooting Raw and using Nikon's very good Image Editing software can enhance the photos quite a bit. The built in flash is not great; an external speedlight with bounce capabilities is really essential for properly exposed photographs (or alternatively not using a flash at all and shooting at a higher ISO/slower shutter speed). Like all modern DSLRs, 'live view' (LCD framing) can be used in lieu of the viewfinder. However if you regularly prefer Live View to an optical viewfinder, probably the SONY offerings or even a compact system camera (ie the Olympus PEN series) is a better choice.The auto focus system on this (and almost every other Nikon SLR) is really, really good. Unlike the Canon SLRs (including some very expensive ones), the Nikon uses an independent infrared auto focus beam that focuses instantly on any fixed object under all lighting conditions (even total darkness). Try shooting in total darkness with any other camera series (except the 4th generation Olympus Pen) and the camera will simply refuse to auto-focus. The Nikon D5200 (and almost all Nikon SLR cameras) focuses under such conditions effortlessly.This camera is expensive when compared to the current prices for the prior generation D5100 or D3100 which are both excellent cameras. Budget minded purchasers may want to give those cameras consideration or else wait for the inevitable price fall of the D5200.
Скромный эксперт
06.03.2014
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
First I spent about 20 hours researching DSLR's from about $200 cheaper to about $400 more expensive because I wanted to upgrade from a Pentax 35mm and a pretty decent Fuji 16MP 15x RAW shooting, point and shoot. My major concern was noisy pictures because all of the digital's I've used can shoot pretty well in sunlight but can really be poor in low light. Trying to stay reasonable and add accessories is a challenge however, so I was leaning towards the D3200 with the Nikkor 300mm, while wanting the D5200. Then I browsed the used offerings here and found many claiming to be new in the box starting at about $550 and spent a little more after investigating and because of the seller's higher positive rating. So this is what I purchased and it was new and unopened in the box with FedEx sign for delivery and a 14 day return.$585..Nikon D5200 with 18-55mm lens$144..Sigma 70-300mm Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 SLD DG Macro Lens with built in motor for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras$19....Polaroid 32GB UHS-1 card Polaroid 32GB High Speed SDHC CL10 UHS-1 Rated Flash Memory (P-SDH32U1-30-GEPOL)$20....AmazonBasics medium DSLR bag AmazonBasics Medium DSLR Gadget Bag (Orange interior)$53....AmazonBasics 70" pistol grip tripod AmazonBasics 70-inch Adjustable Pistol Grip Head Tripod$821..TotalI'm not trying to do your shopping for you but if you price the D3200 with the cheapest Nikkor 300mm lens you'll see why I'm happy.This is truly a fabulous setup and the camera I can not praise enough. It's only been about 40 hours of shooting but I'll tell you what...it's no BS about low light shooting. Even at full telephoto the low light shooting is great! I figure another month and 80 hours of shooting I might be able to use the camera's potential but don't worry about using it right after the battery is charged because auto works awfully well. With all the good reviews here and across the web I just wanted to convey that you might be able to afford this once high priced camera setup (before the new model release and with Nikkor 300mm) cheaper than you thought. I recommend this camera however you purchase it and write this review because I'm just trying to help.
Скромный эксперт
20.09.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This camera, to my knowledge, has the highest quality of any camera that's under $2000 (see DXO Mark's scores. It's even better than the D7100). So far, I have enjoyed this camera and I intend to shoot some landscapes too.I have been using this camera for a little while now and I can say I really am impressed with the image quality. I can shoot with higher ISO settings (ISO 640-2500 is common for me, even 3200 will do in a pinch) than I used to with my previous camera (Canon Xsi), which is a pretty good camera back in the day.I love the Picture Control function. It allows me to customize my JPEG shots. I shoot BOTH Raw and JPEG and use the JPEG format more often, mainly because I have already (with the Picture Control setting) made my image the way I want so I don't have to spend a lot of time in Photoshop trying to make the picture I envisioned in the first place. Plus, you can customize the Picture Control settings exactly the way you want.And I this review would not be complete without a REASON for why, after 33 years with Canon, I switched to Nikon. You see, I love in-camera special effects. In fact, my favorite technique is multiple exposures. But when I was 16 years old, Canon did not have a camera (for under $1000) that could do that. So, I waited. And I waited. I waited 33 years and Canon still did not make one so I switched to Nikon. This particular camera (D5200) has two different multiple exposure capabilities, one for JPEG (you can choose 2 or 3 exposures to overlap)and one for RAW. The Raw one is interesting. It lets you choose ANY two images on the memory card (they must be RAW format images) and you can control how bright each image will be in the final picture. I LOVE my Nikon!Now of the not so good part. There's always a down side to everything. And Nikon is no exception to that generalization either. The only two flaws that I can see with this camera is 1) the battery life is short. But this can be remedied by purchasing a battery grip (off brand names are inexpensive, under $100) and 2) the 18-55 kit lens that came with the body is pretty cheaply made (I recommend purchasing the body only and getting an independent lens, i.e. Tamron's 18-200mm zoom. It sells for under $200 here on Amazon).This camera is worth every penny! Add to cart!:)
Скромный эксперт
27.07.2013
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
Four Stars for features and Three Stars for results. My bundle featured the dove-tailing AF-S 18-55mm VR and 55-300mm VR lenses in a kit for my wife to keep her out of my Canon 60D bag that was kitted with Canon's 18-250mm IS. I'm not married to makes/models or I would not have bought this Nikon. I don't get into the weeds on menu layouts, materials and other subjective items. I rarely shoot video and offer no comments there. This Nikon is otherwise a highly featured camera, especially with scene modes, making it nicely serviceable from new entrants to those who like full manual. I very much like its very hi-res screen display. My typical shooting is in the arena during Texas style barrel racing events demanding high shutter speeds and accurate tracking focus that freezes the dirt in mid-air.I shot the Nikon with its VR 18-55mm lens this morning side-by-side with the Canon 60D / 18-250mm knowing it is not an exact comparison; it's what I had available. There are, however, reviews here extolling this Nikon over pro-sumer models, notably Canons. The subject was flower blossoms and bees providing for both stationary and high speed shooting subjects. The conditions were morning light with cloud cover shooting in Aperture, Shutter, Program and Macro modes with equivalent settings. The 24MP Nikon operated well, but in NO WAY did it's bundled lenses compete with the 18MP 60D kit.The results were very much equivalent to my first DSLR ... a Rebel XT with Canon's earlier and much maligned 18-50mm EOS kit lens. However, shooting with the Nikon VR 55-300mm lens was more satisfying. It still doesn't match the Canon 60D combo, which comes at a $600-$800 price difference. I call it 'satisfactory'. Its minimum focus distance is longer than Canon's 18-250 IS; about 5-6 ft. If I could only buy a Nikon kit w/ one lens, the VR 55-300mm would be it, while searching for a different wide angle zoom. At best, the VR 18-55mm might work well as a portrait lens when 'soft' is desired. Overall, I cannot agree that this Nikon kit is the equivalent of higher end models. That said, it is otherwise so nicely feature laden that it could be the only camera you'll ever need when it is equipped with higher caliber lenses.I see nothing gained with a 24MP model over the Canon 60D 18MP, which produces sharper images as a kit shot for shot. The megapixel wars are over in this camera class. It's the lens wars that matter ... hold on to your wallet for that!!
Показаны отзывы 1-8 из 256.
Как менялась цена на Nikon D5200 Body
Характеристики Nikon D5200 Body
Информация о характеристиках носит справочный характер.
Перед покупкой уточняйте характеристики и комплектацию товара у продавца
Обзоры и руководства на Nikon D5200 Body
Альтернативы с более высокой оценкой
Wizemart © 2026.
Рекомендательная система по умному выбору товаров по отзывам и рейтингам
