Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Nikon D5

Страна изготовитель - Тайланд, не Япония, как написано на сайте.Nikon есть Nikon, что тут добавить! Тем более появились тушки по приемлемой цене! Кто сомневается, берите не пожалеете.

Правда у меня объектив 18-105. Выбирал долго и упорно, анализировал как интернет пространство, так и мнения тех кто уже давно в теме. Это моя первая зеркальная фотокамера, поэтому пребываю в состоянии восторга и настороженности. На данный момент агрегат намного умнее меня, поэтому и осторожничаю)) Метод "тыка" я не приемлю, поэтому изучаю его возможности поэтапно. Начинаю видеть свои банальные промахи - игра света, тени, неверные настройки, "мыло" из-за кривых рук. Появилось желание серьёзно изучить возможности и методы современной фотографии.

На тыщщу цену снизили? Смотря с каким временем, я его здесь же где-то 2 года назад за 28 брал...Хороший фотик, с нормальным объективом для начинающего - само то будет. Уже два года пользуюсь в равках снимаю, правда, объективы получше приобрел, никаких жалоб )). Хотя есть мысли уже что-нибудь покруче приобрести

Классный фотик хороший подарок для себя сделала!!! Не пожалела! Разбираюсь методом тыка)))) читать некогда ! Все получается!

Заказ № 04357892-0033 06 марта 13. Подарила себе любимой на 8 марта. Нам понравился. Четко фотографирует.

Для начинающего фотографа отличная зеркалка, но если собираетесь еще и видео снимать, то есть проблема при настройках ручного режима, такие как диафрагма, ISO и выдержку. В остальном нареканий нет пользуюсь уже больше года доволен, но думаю купить что-нибудь посерьезней, т.к. освоил технику и понял что не хватает возможностей.

Фотографии шикарные и сам замечательный,спасибо))

Только приобрел, отличная игрушка, многому нужно научится, так как только начал, больше увлекается фотками!

Let's be honest...you want a camera that responds to you and captures the pixels the first time around. As long as you get those pixels, you can get the image you want out of the digital negative.There are few things you get better with more expensive models, including more rapid focus and metering...and if you're in that kind of situation, far be it from me to criticize, you're making use of that kind of equipment.But this is a really good camera. Even factory refurbished, it's a great piece of hardware (though a refurb is better for the entry-level hobbyist). First of all, it shoots in a raw format (for the noobs, that means whatever the sensor sees, it stores...no compression or loss). Nikon produces very consistent optics, so I'd recommend getting Photoshop or at least Photoshop elements (or any Adobe product which gives you Bridge and Adobe Camera Raw) so you can apply the optical compensation.I sold my video camera to buy this model because it handles video in hi-def for casual shooting. You'll need to shoot in ten minutes at a time (that's how the file system works) or plug into a computer for long-duration capture, but you will get what you want.This is also a model with a long history, and replacement parts are still easy to find, so repairs are not impossible. I'm a DIY guy with the right tools and measuring devices, so when my warranty runs out, I can fix this.If you're a noob looking for a starter camera, or a pro looking for a camera that you can take into hazardous conditions (there are off-the-shelf diving shells for this sucker) then this is a great piece of hardware. It's on par with the Canon Eos Rebel T3i...but costs less.One quirk...it knows more about the optics than you do, but has a hard time giving you information. Sometimes it'll cycle past sharp focus if you're too close to an object for your lens. It's a conflict in the software. Just back up, adjust the zoom in a bit, and try again.

This is my second Nikon DSLR (I had a D50 for almost 8 years), and I'm writing this review after about two months of playing around with the camera. I'm a fairly fluent photographer (I had my own darkroom for a while), but I wouldn't say I'm an expert. Like most people, I take 80% of my pics in Auto mode, but I like to sometimes work in manual mode and compose some good shots.Here's my initial impression:Things I like:- Having HD video with sound feels like a miracle. The image quality is excellent, the sound not so much. I bought an external mic, but it really didn't help much. Advice here welcome!- The kit lens and new sensor technology create very crisp, clean and bright images with a lot of depth. I'd say the images are notably cleaner (less noise) and brighter (better contrast control and metering) than my old D50. But the difference isn't massive, and remember the D50 had only a 6MP sensor- Color and overall balance is excellent- The controls and swivel screen are much, much better than I'm used to. They really help make you a better photographerThings I'm getting used to:- The auto focus settings are confusing and often seem to track to the wrong object in a frame. It's hard to compose a shot and establish strong depth of field without going into manual mode (but this could be user error)- The pre-programmed settings for different shooting conditions haven't made a big impression so far. Easier to create your own shot- The in-camera HDR setting has a subtle but good effect, especially useful in bringing out skies in landscapes- The form factor of the camera is great.So far, so good. One other comment - I'm expecting this will be the last DSLR I will ever buy, and not because this is the camera that will meet all my future needs. The D5100 is pretty bulky - too bulky really - and the next-generation of mirrorless cameras with interchangeable lenses and much smaller form-factors will be the way to go.

i have been shooting with slr's for 37 years owning several. the 5100 is a typical nikon which is good. even the kit lens if quite good. excellent picture quality producing vivid, crystal clear, sharp pics. way more pixels than you will ever need even for aggressive cropping. color and exposure are easily set. this camera does very well in low light even with the relatively slow kit lenses. i have the 55-200mm as well as the 18-55.my only complaint is with the auto focus, it is not very fast and has trouble shooting through windows and screens, hunts in many situations. i called nikon and the woman told me it sometimes takes "a few tries" to focus correctly which is unacceptable. it is better if i don't try to shoot at 18 or 55mm, each end of the zoom. it doesn't compare with the AF snappiness of my minolta 5d which has never had a problem with AF. the nikon also has no focus motor in the body so you have to pay a premium for the afs lenses, each one having it's own motor. it also lacks the in body anti shake but instead the anti shake is in the lens, so you pay for it in each lens. i haven't shot enough video to even comment. all in all a great camera but i have had to use it in manual mode because the AF issues. it can be faster to just switch to manual rather than wait for the camera to figure out what to focus on. i have had way more useable photos with this camera than my minolta and i think the photo quality is a little better. the nikon feels plasticy though, kind of cheaply built.i can't figure out the prices though, the two lens kit is $45 less than the one lens kit and my kit was $270 less than the current price around christmas.

So this camera is just amazing at giving you great resolution and dynamic range. The 18-55mm lens that comes with it is sharper than the 18-70mm and 18-200mm. Pictures are usable up to 1600 ISO. The controls are fairly decent though in some modes not all options are available, such as shooting in HDR requires you to choose certain configurations that I can't even remember what they are. I tried looking up on google to see why HDR was greyed out but their suggestions didn't help. Not that I care about HDR that much but it's frustrating when you can't choose it when you need it. The white balance is another issue. You cannot always choose customized white balance. Again it depends on the settings you choose and this too is something I have no idea what settings would make it work. I never had this problem with Canon DSLR's. I'll say that for everything else the D5100 is miles beyond anything Canon has in the same price range. In fact this camera is superior to the D90 that I used to covet so much. This model is the real sweet spot between all of the models from D3000-D5300. I mean 16mp is enough of a hassle without going to 24mp. This megapixel race is ridiculous. If only there were options for 6-8mp NEFs. This is a superior camera than the two successors and can be had very inexpensive. If you need a longer lens I'd suggest the 18-105mm instead of buying the 55-200mm as an add on. Even with the 18-55mm you can simply crop to zoom in as it'll be as sharp as anything. If all you care about is image quality choose your DSLR in this order: D5100, D3000, D3100, and ignore the rest.

I had a d50 for a long time, and felt it was time to upgrade. This performs as well as that with a lot more speed. Side by side photos on the screen look the same (d50 is 6.0 megapixel). Printed there is probably a difference. However, this camera is much faster in burst mode and also shoots video, which is why I got it. What I miss is the internal motor for AF on older lenses, but I can handle focusing manually. Non AF-S lenses are (mostly) still compatible, which is why I like Nikon. I don't have any complaints, it just wasn't the step up from the D50 that I had imagined. Video quality is OK, I wish I could get 60 FPS on the highest resolution. I've had it for nearly two years and it still functions perfectly and I have even dropped it once (the lens also still functions perfectly but the plastic casing didn't survive.) Recommended if you want a good camera that gives you a great auto mode and also full manual controls, but to be honest, the smaller camera systems are starting to go down in price and the size of those is very attractive, and the sensor is the same size, such as the samsung nx300. If I was buying today, I'd go that route.

The D5100 was my first DSLR camera, when I purchased a used D5100 body on ebay January 2013. I wasn't willing to buy the D5200 and it's 24 mp sensor, because the difference is only apparent in large prints. In summary, the D5100 has superior image quality and low-noise at high iso (upwards to 1,000 iso) low light situations, a good button layout, and a video mode that leaves the user wanting more.Features at glance: - 3-inch LCD swivel screen - 16.2MP (same sensor as D7000) - In-camera HDR (High Dynamic Range) - Full HD 1920 x 1080p at 30fps - ISO Sensitivity: 100-6400 (Extended Mode: 100-25600)PROS+ Stunning image quality - very crisp and sharp+ Easy to navigate through menu+ Good, intuitive button layout. I prefer Nikon's entry level DSLR layout to Canon's, with Nikon's placement of the thumb dial and cursor pad.+ Lightweight+ In camera HDR+ Very good performance at high iso and low light situationsCONS+ lack of Nikon branded accessories - no Nikon brand battery grip or LCD cover+ Decent video mode - not fully manual like Canon's entry level Rebel series. The only mode that gives you control is aperture priorityThe D5100 has an excellent sensor in a small form entry level body. If you don't need the extra buttons, LCD screen, weather-sealed body, the D5100 is a great place to start digital photography or as a lightweight backup to pros.Word of caution: as you learn more about digital photography with the D5100, you may find yourself outgrowing the entry level body rather quickly. 6 months later I downgraded the sensor and bought a pro-grade body with the D200. The pro-grade body's rugged build and plethora of buttons are very useful as your skills develop.

I have always owned Nikon cameras. My last one is a 20/20 bought in the late 80's that I still have. I have been waiting on a digital SLR at a good price point and this one came along. I have used this camera for a number of trips and I have to say I am NOT disappointed in the level of detail in the pictures. Sometimes, it hangs up and I can't take a picture so I have to switch to manual mode but honestly, I LOVE my new Nikon. I also use my old telescopic lens from my 20/20 and it will work with this camera - definitely have to go into manual mode to use but there are NO problems with the pictures or the detail. If there are any bad pictures, it's due to the person behind the lens snapping the pics. I have to say that I LOVE digi because I can take picture after picture and delete as many as I want and still GET GREAT SHOTS, even the motion shots come out great! WOW! is all I can say. I'm an amateur only. But if you have any interest in seeing any shots, let me know.

I bought this camera as a back-up to my D7000. It is much lighter/compact, which is great when i want to use the camera for personal use/family outings. I both love and hate that the display screen folds out- its great for live view when i do high angle shots (i'm super short, so i have to hold it above my head) and I can still see what i'm taking a photo of. what i hate about this screen is that its either out/open to the side, or closed and you cant see it. i wish it could flip around and so you can still see the display while its flat against the camera. I have worries that it will get hit at a rowdy wedding and break right off. besides that I love this camera so far! Also love that I got two lenses with this bundle, mine even came with a lens hood which was nice.

All images are generally overexposed, whether in full auto mode or in manual modes using the meter. I am losing color depth and nearly every image is requiring editing. The only exceptions are some of my daughter's portraits. She likes the 60s dusty look. I'm trying to research whether or not there is a global adjustment for exposure to resolve the problem.All else is great. The controls are intuitive, the lenses are pretty good for a starter kit. The vibration reduction, auto focus and other helps make it easy to get great photos. If only I could get rich, balanced color and light.