Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Nikon D5

After years of using the basic "point and shot" and then that earlier this year bought a Kodak Z990 (mostly to get used to the size of the device, although obviously the D5100 is much larger and heavier lol) I decided to buy it model after months of what I thought was an endless and insatiable search and comparison of equipment on the web pages that I think about photography pioneers such as DxOMark, DPReview, Snapsort, Sortable and KenRockwell.The toughest battles were fought mainly between brands Nikon and Sony, I also did important considerations for Pentax and Canon. The only Canon camera that I loved was the 60D but is very expensive for me ($ 1000), I believe that Canon is more to a professional level, that is, to dare to buy any of the 5D Mark but at a lower level other brands Nikon, Sony and Pentax are better. I liked the Pentax K-5 and K-30 mainly because they are practically immune to water, dust and extreme conditions (which gives them great advantage over other brands), but I fall on the same theme money are cameras over $ 900, and are therefore out of reach.So stay in the range of Nikon and Sony whose excellent performance at a lower price level of professionalism and superior to all other brands. I have to note that by Nikon took into account the D3200 and D5100 and by Sony A580 only (this because of information supplied by people DxOMark about the "low noise at high ISO"). The Sony A580 was out of competition due to increased price of $ 850 to over $ 900 while for example the D5100 down to $ 650, almost $ 300 less. I must report that I began to consider Sony's NEX series, especially the new NEX-F3 (the characteristic "bounce flash" and a folding screen to take you forward your own pictures was what I liked), but , also I gave up because I said to myself, for just $ 50 more would take a more serious and professional equipment like the Nikon D5100!.Anyway, I was the fight between the D5100 and D3200, this was the final battle (the hardest and most difficult of all) by the side of the D3200 had a new processor Xpeed 3, a 24MP sensor and a menu of friendly options for beginners like me. On the side of the D5100 had a 360 ° rotatable screen, a device a step up professionally and special effects systems like HDR. All this fight for a little difference of $ 50!. I finally ended up deciding for the D5100 compared to D3200 for two reasons: The screen can be rotated (helps me sometimes to take pictures of my little daughter just months old) and $ 50 less than I paid for it that were used to purchase an accessory , the SB-400 (do not forget to buy it, is very good and help a thousand times the flash with the camera by default).I hope my experience captured here will help them do.

I've used a Nikon D5000 for a few years and loved it but I took notice of this one when it first came out and thought I would upgrade, mostly for things like in-camera HDR and, esp., the higher resolution LCD. Thought about it for a year and a couple of weeks ago decided to go for it. (Something about impending holidays triggers the camera buying urge.) Since I had all the lenses I needed I bought the body only, saving about $100 over the kit price.As expected, it was a great upgrade. What I wasn't expecting was the improvement in full auto mode. I'm able to take decent photos now under conditions the D5000 complained about or didn't do well in. Since I take more photos in full auto mode than not, this is a nice bonus. (I'm not adverse to fussing with shutter speed, aperture, etc., and you can certainly do that all you want with this camera, but I take a lot of casual photos.)If I were buying this as my first Nikon I'd probably buy the body and pay a couple of hundred extra for the 18-105 mm zoom rather than get the kit with the 18-55 zoom. It's a better walking around lens in my opinion. I might also buy the 35mm f1.8 prime lens for low light/indoor shots (or extra crispy shots of any kind). Those were the two lenses I bought when I got my D5000 and I use them the most. (Another useful lens that's reasonably priced is the Tokina 12-24 f4 zoom.)The only (minor) complaint I have is that my non-Nikon TTL flash unit doesn't work properly with the D5100. I get badly overexposed shots with anything other than straight-up, off the ceiling bounce. Probably time to look at getting a real Nikon flash unit.Update on the flash unit problem. My Polaroid brand TTL flash and the D5100's full auto setting don't get along. It works fine in Program mode, though. On the D5000 it worked in either mode, but apparently there is a subtle difference in the D5100 interface. The flash tracks the zoom and aperture, but either the flash is firing at full power or the camera's auto mode is not aware the flash is going to fire and sets up for available light. Newer Polaroid flash units than mine might work better with the D5100.

This is my second D5100...one gets both ends of the Nikon's quality products. I don't go so much for more electronic features in a camera which main purpose is to take beautiful memorable still pictures. The only observable action is that I think I got a "new", really new item! The focal ring is tight to adjustment, which means it has not been mishandled. unlike when it is loose which would indicate it has been manipulated endlessly. My criteria are speed(focusing), clarity, and precision. Speed of focusing is amazing in auto mode. I shoot animals (birds), people, I like to take those unpredictable moments and scenes. I take pictures from inside my car while in motion(don't do it) to catch fleeting moments lost in time as one drives by. Maybe D5200 is speedier...I don't know, I got to buy it first.

Been shooting Nikon SLRs for 10 years. I started with the legendary Nikon FM2n film camera in B&W photography class. It was almost a purely mechanical camera, except there was a small lithium ion battery to power the meter. Back in the days of mechanical cameras, you had to stick in the film, pull out the tab and line it up with the notches, then use the level to roll it to the first shot. After every shot, you had to pull another lever to advance it. There were times when I didn't notch the film correctly and I'd end up taking all my pictures on one shot of the film; never knowing it until I got it developed. You also had to adjust the aperture and shutting speed manual with the two dials, while looking through your viewfinder trying to spot the +,0,- signs. But taking pictures with mechanical cameras wasn't the hard part. It was all the time spent in complete darkness in a closet to unroll the film canister and dropping it in container to develop your film; all in the dark. If your solution wasn't mixed properly, your film would be overexposed or completely useless. Those were the times.Fast forward to the Nikon D5100 modern DSLR. It's not only a digital camera, it's also a digital camcorder, and a limited digital dark room that allows you to do some tuning on your photos in the camera itself. This camera starts up and gets shots off fast. If you don't like to think, put it in auto and it'll think for you. If you like to think 'a little', put it in Aperture mode and it'll calculate the shutter speed for you. I've had the D50 previously and I thought I would miss the ISO button, top LCD, and various other buttons. Once I get it started, I've concluded there were way too many bonuses that outweighed the cons of upgrading. The settings panel activted by the "i" button allows you to change frequently used settings very quickly. In the D50 you had to drill down to these menu items. I only miss the ISO button but you can assign that to the terribly placed 'fn' button next to the flash. The 'record' button is also terribly placed btw. I'm fine with all the other placements of the buttons and the screen is just incredible on this. The 16MP sensor is outstanding in detail and low light shooting. The movie mode does not allow you to change F-stops or shutter speeds in the middle of recording. You must stop if you want to change those settings when shooting video. I find the auto focus picks up a lot of lens noise, best if you manual focus and the beautifully sharp screen makes it easy to MF indoors and in the shade. As for the software View NX2, it's not bad for developing RAW. It brings out good detail and shows you the picture it was meant to be seen. It does not have any noise removal features or sensor dust masking. It has most of the basic controls like exposure compensation, white balance, and cropping. It has no history feature. You can export the RAW as a loseless TIFF, where you can continue your editing in say Photoshop or Lightroom should you need advanced tools.Flash is limited to 1/200s and there is no high speed flash synchronization. There is also no remote command of flashes (flashes not attached to the hot shoe).The pictures out of the camera were a bit oversaturated for my tastes, resulting in images that looked over processed and dark areas losing detail. I experimented quite a while trying to figure out how to tune the JPG pictures you get out of the camera. My setting below will give you more natural pictures with a slight hint of color saturation and slight warmth in tone.Standard picture setting+6 sharpening-1 contrast-1 saturationOverall, a superbly designed camera.

...Seriously. If you're reading reviews here, you're most likely thinking about purchasing the D5100. I'm not yet a professional photographer, but I am a serious enthusiast with the intent of eventually taking my photography to the next level. I am the (proud) owner of a Nikon D60, and I can say that the D5100 is a very strong upgrade from the D60. Improvements in image quality were immediately noticed with the D5100, and low light shooting is awesome with this camera. When I bought my D60, I had high hopes for the low light shooting capabilities, however it ended up falling short of my expectations. The D5100 definitely meets the expectations I originally had for the D60 in regards to low light shooting, and possibly even exceeds them a bit. That being said, the D60 is still a great camera which takes great photos, and I would highly recommend it to anyone starting out in SLR photography. The manual for the D60 is definitely a bit better than the D5100's, and explains things in greater detail. The way the buttons feel on the D5100 when pressed seem cheaper than that of the D60, but that's just an observation of mine from owning both cameras, and someone purchasing the D5100 probably wouldn't even notice this unless they had another camera to compare it to. The D5100 still feels solid and of good quality, and you get professional looking image results, even using the kit 18-55mm lens. With the 35mm f1.8 Nikon prime lens, you get even sharper results, and it is definitely a recommended accessory for anyone who purchases this camera. I purchased this camera in February because I wanted to have it for a vacation I was taking. Needless to say it did not disappoint!For those interested in HDR photography, this camera does have an auto bracketing feature which can be used in conjunction with the self timer, allowing for hands free operation (granted you have a tripod.) However, you can only do one image over and one image under exposed using this option, and the timer (or auto bracketing) have to be reset after each series of images due to the assign button only having the capability of one feature being assigned to it at a time. This is something that I didn't happen to notice in anyone's review here, (maybe I just missed it?) but would have liked to have known ahead of time. Certainly not a deal breaker though, and no reason to give it less than 5 stars. I could go on and on, but there's not much here with everyone's reviews that hasn't already been said. Basically, almost all of the positive comments here are most likely true, and buying this camera should be a purchase that you won't regret. Especially when it's on sale! It's essentially a less professional version of the D7000 with the same image quality for half the price. I originally wanted the D7000, but couldn't justify the price. I can say with confidence that I made the right choice by saving my money and going for the D5100. Invest in some good lenses, because that's going to make the biggest difference!

I looked at all of the entry to mid-level dslrs and the D5100 best fit my needs as an "experienced beginner". Initially, I was a bit hesitant, because I was afraid I'd outgrow it rather quickly, so I also bought a D7000 intending to return one of them (I know, this is sometimes frowned upon, but Amazon's excellent return privileges are there for a reason).They're both great cameras and you can't go wrong with either. But I've decided to keep the D5100 for a number of reasons, including:- To my eyes, image quality is virtually indistinguishable between the 2 cameras, and I engaged in some serious pixel-peeping while reaching this conclusion. Both use the same Sony sensor. Where the D7k probably has an edge is with sports and capturing moving subjects in low light (neither of which I had the chance to shoot).- Both of the D7000's I tried had backfocusing problems due to faulty bodies. What are the odds of that?- The D7000 overexposes in bright/high contrast scenes, requiring -ev adjustment to prevent loss of detail from highlight clipping. Some may not mind this, but I think that, in its default state, the camera shouldn't overexpose to the point of losing detail, unless you're shooting in full manual mode and have chosen the wrong settings. Sometimes you don't have time to set ev comp to take advantage of a great photo op.- My trusty D5100 has had no problems whatsoever. Focus is tack sharp. Everything works and it's been an absolute pleasure to use. I also don't recall reading reports of any known problems or design flaws with the D5100, unlike the D7000.- The small form factor and light weight of the 5100 make it great for traveling. The articulating screen can also come in handy. It's well-made and the mostly-plastic build isn't a problem. Besides, the D7000 uses magnesium alloy only on the back and top (as if it was used more for show than for real ruggedness). The rest of the body shell is plastic, which is fine for most of us amateurs. If you want real ruggedness, you need to step up to a pro model.- The 5100 is often referred to as a beginner's camera, but it's actually capable of most of the things even an advanced user would need. Some of the secondary essentials (WB, release mode, bracketing) are in menus, but they're quick to access. All of the key functions, however (aperture, shutter speed, exposure comp, flash mode, AE/AF lock, ISO) are controllable via buttons (ISO can be assigned to the function button) and once you get used to the layout, it becomes second nature. There's a plethora of settings, and it *is* a camera one can grow with and hold onto for awhile. The D7000, otoh, has lots of features that I (and perhaps many other amateurs) would rarely or never use.- Being my first dslr, I didn't have any old Nikkor AFS lenses and I don't plan to buy many more lenses beyond the three that I already have. So the internal focus motor of the D7000 wasn't of any value to me. The D7000's larger, brighter, 100% coverage viewfinder is missed, but I can live without it. The D7000's glass prism adds a fair amount of weight.- Cost wasn't an issue, but I don't exactly mind saving $400 especially when I'm getting the same image quality. To me, the 5100 was a better value. The money is better spent on lenses. Furthermore, given the short life cycle of electronic products, it doesn't make sense to invest in a more expensive body with extra non-essential (to me) features, since there will be interesting developments in the next couple of years (e.g. advancement in mirrorless cam technology and lens selection), tempting me to upgrade.I'd recommend buying the D5100 body only, passing on the 18-55 kit lens in favor of the 35mm 1.8. Then add a 16-85VR and 70-300VR as budget permits. These lenses are all super sharp and should cover almost any shot that comes up. The 18-105 is a good, cheaper alternative to the 16-85.

This camera really is great. I am writing this after using a Nikon D3100, Nikon D5200, and Canon Rebel T3i.There is a huge gap between the D5000 and D5100, but very little between the D5100 and D5200 or D5300.The D5100 feels like it has a better grip than the other two because they are a little smaller.I use this camera to take long exposure star pictures, and while it doesnt compare to the D600 or D4, it still has relatively low noise for how cheap it is. I found there was even more noise in the D5200.The articulating back screen is probably the best thing about this camera compared to the D3100 or D3200. You think you wont need it, but when you have it, you wont know how you lived without it.If you're looking for a camera for the budding photographer, go with this camera or the D5300 if you have the money. The D3100 and D3200 are full of megapixels, but that wont matter if you cant take a good picture first. The lenses are the most important thing when it comes to photography.

I'm brand new to photography. I've been wanting to learn for years rather than to keep shelling out money for someone else to take mediocre pictures of my children. I did a lot of research and spoke with a lot of people before deciding on this. My total budget was $1000 for camera, lenses, case, cards, and software. I picked Nikon over Canon after trying them out in the store solely based on how it felt in my hand. The menu on the Nikon felt more intuitive as did the button placement. I also tend to think of Nikon as "The" camera people. The package I put together was this camera body with the 55-200mm kit lens, the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G AF-S DX lens, 1 Transcend 16 GB Class 6 SDHC Flash Memory Card, BUILT Cargo Camera Bag- Fiery Orange, Medium, and photoshop CS5 free trial then CS6 free trial then monthly. I also spend a lot of time online learning how to use my camera and how to edit my photos. What I love about this camera: It's easy to use, all the lenses I have hold their value and can be resold or move with me to my next camera. This camera takes beautiful photos and is fairly forgiving as I play around with the settings. I've been taking it everywhere and have loved the pictures I have been able to take. My oldest graduated from high school this year and there was a photographer hired to get photos of the kids crossing the stage. The one taken of my son was awful. I had my camera with the 55-200mm lens on and got great shots of him and his friends from across the stadium. I've even had people ask me to take pictures of events for my kids school! That's more likely because I alwasy have my camera but nonetheless, I'm finding this camera an excellent camera to learn on. I can see using this for years before I would feel the need to upgrade. There is so much to learn and enough manual settings to really be able to play around and figure out what I like. If I had a larger budget, I would have gone for the D7000 just because that seems to be a level I could stay with indefinitely but on my budget, I'm very happy with my purchase! It also takes very nice video which is fun to play around with although, I'm primarily using this for photography.

As other reviewers have noted the camera worked fine for a while, then started producing black images. Took it in for "repair". It worked again for a couple days, then the problem resurfaced. Its been 'reset' so many times now that it doesn't work at all. I am HIGHLY PISSED. I spent so much money on this camera and cannot take a basic picture and cannot rely on it working from one minute to the next. DO NOT PURCHASE THIS PRODUCT.

For camera novices who think this is going to be easy to use, think again. After about 3-4 months went by, we finally started taking pictures with it. It does take some great pictures though. I purchased this product under "used - like new" for about $300 less than what I would have paid for it new. If you have the patience to read the owners manual from cover to cover, you will like using this camera.

I got this camera in December 2012 so I've had it for almost a year now. I started out with a point and shoot, A canon powershot sx230. So of course this was a big step up. But I played with other cameras and made my decision after a lot of reading etc. I love this camera, for what it is and the price. I haven't had any issues with it yet. You get the same sensor as the more expensive D7000, just a cheaper body. I got a few months ago the Nikkor AF-S50mm 1.8G. I don't even use the kit lens that it came with anymore really, except for some wider shots of a room or something. The Glass is what makes the difference! If you're a beginner and deciding between this and the D7000 or one of the more expensive ones. I say get this, save your money and buy a better lens because that is the big difference in image quality. I'm saving up for more lenses and then will get a new body in a few years when needed but invest in glass is what I have to say! Overall, I have to just say this is a great camera and I would highly recommend it.(Also make sure to get Adobe Lightroom for your photos.)

I got this camera a few months ago and I have to say, this is one of the best beginners DLSR cameras out there. The interface is simple and with enough practice, simple to understand what the numbers mean. I love the swivel LCD screen (it has come in handy when filming and taking pictures). I would recommend this camera to any beginner out there looking to go from a point and shoot to an SLR camera. The packaging was damaged but the actual box the equipment came in wasn't. I am very pleased with this purchase.

This is one of the best buys that I have purchased on Amazon in the past 3 years. I love this camera as I make a of videos and the swivel screen helps ensure that you are able to get awkward situations (such as the need to put the camera over your head or down to the florr)

After weeks of product and spec research the great nikon vs cannon debate...I felt like I was being spun around and confused which camera to buy! First off the fans of each camera will try to sway you their way, it truely is just a personal preference! Both take great pictures! (I was lucky enough and found out that I had 2 had coworkers bring one of each camera into work and I was able to walk around and take some quick pictures to see how I liked cannon or nikon.)The reason I ended up with the Nikon was I had owned a Nikon point and shoot some years ago and the controls were similar and the thought that if I do upgrade the body later, my lenses were more of an investment since I could keep any lenses I purchased.I by no means have any photography knowledge this is my first "fancy" camera and I was not let down. I found it easy to use right out of the box on the auto settings, but fun to explore after reading the manual and I also purchased a book on my kindle app that I can send you the name upon request(didn't want to favor any books in this review) But needless to say at first all the lingo was a bit foreign to me, but after some time(about 2 weeks) I started to comprehend it. I do not claim to know much but I can at least put together some stuff on the manual settings which once you get into the details you will love those manual settings that you can change yourself!I am a mom of a 10 year old and a golden retriever dog so I wanted to capture everything in great quality, with this camera I feel I have done that and I'm only just learning how to use it. The sports setting works amazing I will post some sports pictures of my son, with 4 frames per second I catch every movement of his peewee football games I love it! The images are vivid and crisp.I'm only starting to learn photography but trying my best to comprehend stuff and learn the settings on the camera, If you are like me and don't plan to be a professional photography but want crisp beautiful pictures of your family and friends then I would recommend this camera I don't think you would be disappointed. Its very easy to use at first and has such room for growth esp with the lenses that you can add on. I only have the 18-55mm I bought with the kit but already planning to buy more lenses!For the price and being an entry level camera I'm sure you wont be disappointed as well! Good luck!

- same sensor as higher model D7000- good in low light- display is not usable as you would want to use viewfinder to compose your shots, viewfinder is dark.- display has a great chance of breaking/damaging- interface is not user friendly, menu functions not readily accessible,- not enough dedicated buttons on body- no AF motor for older lenses- AF assist is really good in low light, locks focus in all situations- DX format, not many lens available- no MF/AF switch on body- no in-body image stabilization- lightweight and compact- only 1 SD card slot- great battery life- video AF is poor- turns out doesn't work with Nikon flash system as a commander- sync speed is only 1/200 sec

I am semi-new at photography and want to learn EVERYTHING. I have a D3200 that I have been learning on and decided to try others. I bought this camera and another camera at the same time. This is a step up from the D3200 and is a really nice camera. I like it a lot. I would recommend this camera.

It almost can't take a bad picture! I have renewed my love of photography with the Nikon D5100 from when I used a completely manual Pentax 35mm in high school when the Manual setting was all you had; setting your own f-stop, shutter speed, flash distance, etc. This camera does it all, but I prefer to use either A, S or flat out M to get the shot I want. The kit lens is pretty standard but excellent. Great for those kids or pet shots around the house, snap shots of family and events. Found this on Amazon on a Christmas sale for $75 less than the D3100 that I had my eye on at Best Buy. (That's a $250 price reductions!!) Merry Christmas to me!!

I am an amateur photographer, and the D5100 meets my needs. I am satisfied about 99% of my results. Interchanging the lens is very easy and quick. I had a Nikon N 90S , and a Nikon F-2N. I am happy with all three.

First of all, I'm very pleased with the camera and lenses. It's more than meeting my expectations for an entry-level DSLR. I'm also very satisfied with the service provided by the seller. My order was processed and shipped promptly. I paid only for standard shipping and would have had it in my hands by the end of the third business day had someone been home to sign for it.

Loved the size and light weight but the autofocus became a huge issue for me over time. Missed too many good shots just because the darn thing would not find focus in time, especially in darker setting ie indoors and at night. The quality of the pictures was okay but I finally realized this camera is just underpowered for my needs (can't really think anybody but total amateur could be happy with it). The live shooting mode is next to useless because of how long it takes to focus and how unreliable the focus is int this mode (this is still a huge issue for most DSLRs). Was happy to advance to a D600, although even this camera could use the more advanced autofocus of the D800 ie 51 points instead of the 39 points it has (silly of Nikon to have purposefully undermined its functionality that way). Can't really recommend this camera to anyone except somebody who can't afford any better or needs the portability above all other considerations.

I am still learning all the things that this camera can do, but so far the few features I have experimented with have been awesome. I like to shoot at night and low light levels, this camera handles it wonderfully well. Crisp clean pro pictures are easy to get with a VR lens.

For the price, it's not an awful camera. This was my first dslr & it lasted me a long while. Great starter camera. It however does like to freeze when flipping through screens but that's not that terrible. The auto focus is mediocre. The flip out screen is handy for a LOT of reasons and i will miss that when i upgrade. Overall, worth the buy. You probably won't get a nicer one for the price

Let me begin by saying I'm a published photographer. I learned how to take pictures, luckily by hanging out on Hollywood studio sets. I'm a longtime Nikon camera buff who also loves different film stocks. But the problem with film is even here in Los Angeles it's hard to get film developed quickly. So after years of not wanting to go to digital, I decided to buy me a decent DSLR.Like many old guys who loved their built like a tank Nikons, there was much to hate about the new Nikons. Too much plastic, cheap build, blah, blah, blah.Yes, the latest DSLR cameras are fragile, but that's still my only complaint. In every way, the capabilities of these new cameras will win you over. If I could have owned a camera twenty years ago that could shot 4 pics a second, lets me see the pictures instantly, lets me crop and color correct on the spot, lets me show my client what I already have shot, was completely silent when focusing, battery life that lasts, brackets automatically and shots high def video, all for less than $600 I would have laughed. $600 was for just one lens, let alone the camera body.But this D5100 does alot right. The picture quality is astounding. In the great Nikon tradition, the pictures are sharp and the contrast of each image is wonderful. The flexibility of this camera is amazing. I can still put my old AF lenses on the camera, courtesy of a lens mount created in 1959. The only thing is you have to focus those old lenses manually. No big deal there. I even wanted to hate the new lens cover designs and lens hoods, but they all do the job and while plastic, it's pretty darn good plastic.The 18-55mm lens is awesome for a variety of shooting situations, much better than the standard, and pretty useless 50mm they used to give you with most camera body purchases.As a result of this camera, I'm getting back into photography with a good deal of excitement. It's nice that Nikon has allowed me to use some of my old equipment with all the new technology.I didn't want to be impressed, but the stuff is pretty cool.

Looking through reviews for this camera, I occasionally see it described as a good "entry level" camera. This is such an elitist thing to say. It's essentially saying, "My camera is more advanced, so since you're buying this, you're a beginner." If the D5100 is a good entry level camera, then the D4 is a spectacular entry level camera. This camera is more advanced than Nikon's flagship professional model ten years ago.The D5100 has virtually every feature that today's enthusiast could hope for. There are plenty of lists out there, and I won't repeat the myriad of features.One thing that I like in particular is the layout of the data on the LCD screen while shooting. All of the common things that you want access to on a regular basis is right there and easy to change. No wandering through hierarchies of menus to change picture size, iso or white balance. And even though I need glasses for everything else, I don't need them for this.If I could change one thing, it would be the grip. Previous Nikons I've owned have had a fuller hand grip. This one seems much smaller. I'm not talking about the height. I like to feel like I've got a firm hold on the camera. With this small grip, I feel like I'm just holding onto the edge of something.But aside from that, I couldn't be happier. Best entry level camera I've purchased since that used Pentax Spotmatic I bought in 1970.