Отзывы о Цифровой Фотоаппарат Nikon D5
Где купить
Цифровой Фотоаппарат Nikon D5
|
Тейл-спиннер циклоп ESOX 20 гр. | Яндекс Маркет | 529 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
Фотоаппарат Nikon D5100 Kit 18-55mm VR, черный | Яндекс Маркет | 39 900 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
Фотоаппарат Nikon D5100 Kit 18-55mm VR, черный | Яндекс Маркет | 39 900 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
Фотоаппарат Nikon D5100 Kit 18-105mm VR, черный | Яндекс Маркет | 49 976 ₽ | Посмотреть |
Плюсы по отзывам пользователей - Почему стоит купить Nikon D5?*
*Плюсы и минусы, которые пользователи называют чаще всего на основе практического опыта использования.
- Отличное качество снимков при слабом освещении:
- Матрица от D7000 обеспечивает низкий уровень шумов до ISO 3200, что подтверждают множественные сравнения с D40/D60/D5000.
- Подходит для室内 съёмки без вспышки, детализация сохраняется даже на ISO 6400 в RAW.
- Динамический диапазон широкий, HDR в камере улучшает детали в тенях и светах.
- Поворотный ЖК-дисплей высокого разрешения:
- Удобен для съёмки с низких углов, над толпой, автопортретов и видео.
- 920 тыс. точек обеспечивают чёткий просмотр, можно закрыть для защиты.
- Работает с Live View и помогает в композиции без видоискателя.
- Компактность и эргономика:
- Лёгкий вес (около 500 г с объективом) удобен для длительных прогулок и путешествий.
- Хороший хват, приятные материалы, меньше D7000, но не уступает по удобству.
- Тихий затвор и быстрый запуск подходят для съёмки событий.
- Full HD видео:
- Снимает 1080p@30fps без "желе", с внешним микрофоном качество звука улучшается.
- Поворотный экран упрощает кадрирование, ручная фокусировка минимизирует шум AF.
- Лучше, чем у D3100, подходит для любительских роликов.
- Цена/качество и универсальность:
- Та же матрица, что в D7000, но дешевле, китовый 18-55 VR даёт резкие снимки.
- Авторежимы просты для новичков, ручные — для роста навыков.
- Долгая работа от батареи (600+ снимков), RAW+JPEG без потери скорости.
- Быстрый AF и серия:
- 11 точек AF точны для портретов и спорта (4 к/с до 17 кадров).
- Подсветка AF помогает в темноте, лучше D3100.
- Брекетинг и эффекты (селективный цвет) полезны для экспериментов.
Минусы по отзывам пользователей - О чем стоит задуматься перед покупкой:
- Отсутствие моторчика автофокуса в корпусе:
- Не фокусируется на старых AF-объективах, требует AF-S (упоминают 20%+ пользователей).
- Ограничивает выбор оптики, докупка AF-S увеличивает расходы.
- Влияет на совместимость с дешёвыми винтажными линзами.
- Неудобное управление настройками:
- Нет выделенной кнопки ISO, fn-кнопка одна, меню для WB/метрики замедляет работу.
- В Live View AF медленный и шумный, неудобно для видео/макро.
- Маленький видоискатель (темный, 95% покрытия) хуже D7000/D90.
- Короткое время работы батареи в Live View/видео:
- 20-30 мин видео на одном заряде, Live View быстро садит АКБ.
- Индикатор заряда грубый (3 деления), требует запасной батареи.
- В холоде садится быстрее, не для длительных съёмок без подзарядки.
- Пластиковый корпус и мелкие недочёты:
- Чувствуется легче/дешевле D7000, люфтит отсек карты у некоторых.
- Встроенная вспышка слабая для помещений, переэкспонирует.
- QC-issues: пыль/горячие пиксели на сенсоре (редко, но упоминают).
- Ограничения видео:
- AF в видео "гуляет", шумит, нет полного мануального контроля ISO.
- Моно-звуки со встроенного микрофона, нужен внешний.
- 20 мин лимит клипа, не для профессиональной съёмки.
- Мелкие интерфейсные проблемы:
- Нет топового LCD, настройки только через задний экран.
- Брекетинг одноразовый, HDR работает только на неподвижных сценах.
- Неудобно менять режимы с закрытым экраном.
1334 отзывов пользователей о Nikon D5
Пользовались
Nikon D5?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
Скромный эксперт
09.06.2013
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
So, I first had the sony a55 for two years, and wasn't thrilled with it in the least bit. I don't know how many people reviewing these sony cameras print their pictures, but I do and the pictures always had a lot of noise in dark areas, weren't sharp, the colors were never vibrant, and I normally had to edit the crap outta them to make them look like they weren't taken with my iphone. They looked slightly better on a screen, but once printed- I would have about one good picture out of 100. And that was the a55. I thought I had just got a lemon or something, since it has so many raving reviews.So! I had a bestbuy warranty and broke the a55 after two and a half years, and because I had a sony zoom lens I could do nothing with, i decided to be upgraded to the a65. Even with a poor experience with the a55, I was so thrilled to get the a65, thinking It would be a better dslt, and I have to say it was worst as far as picture quality goes. Edges not sharp whatsoever [which is the main thing I look for in a photo], colors are faded, when I print the pictures it looks like an iPhone took them. I know how to use a camera, I tried different times of day and different settings. Also, I'm printing the pictures at an actual photo lab. I could get better pictures with a canon sx260.I was very very unhappy with the picture quality, and I showed about 6 other people the pictures and literally all of they agreed. Same terrible noise and grain in dark areas like the a55,, blurry, faded colors. The dark areas don't even have to be that dark to get noise. The pictures look beautiful on the bright LCD screen, but it's a big difference than what your actually getting.However! Some things I did like about it was how easy it is to use, it explains everything as you go through the settings [great for beginners]; how friggin fast it is (which is the first thing I noticed when I took my first picture), and the body IMO feels very sturdy. Also, the viewfinder to lcd screen with just your eye is a nice feature. Or was that the a55? i dont remember. Besides those things, i was extremely dissapointed, and I returned it and stood at bestbuy for half an hour debating between the nikon d5100, d5200, and d7000. I want the d7000, but it was out of my price range, so I got the d5100 to just try out a nikon; and mannn, what a difference. Huge huge huge difference. It's cheaper then the a65, and so much better as far as picture quality goes. I was flipping through some pictures last night, and they are so so vibrant and crisp without editing them. On my computer, I was flipping backwards through my pictures and all the sudden the pictures got ugly and I was like, "what happened with that one in all these beautiful ones?" And I realized it got into pictures from the a65.Im really feeling the nikon, but I will be returning it as well, this time I'm gonna get the d7000 and take the price hit, because the body of the nikon feels very cheap. I've had it a week and the battery cover won't open. Also, you have to turn a nob on the top of the camera to switch from viewfinder to LCD every time the camera turns on, and I don't use the viewfinder and that's inconvenient for me and made me miss a picture yesterday. The camera is 4fps i believe, and it is a tid bit slow if your thinking about using it for sports. Maybe you can buy a lens. Idk.And one last thing negative about the nikon is I personally don't like the Double shutter noise it makes every picture you take. Besides those, though, the picture quality is so far impressive. ive only printed a few, but they werent too shabby either. I buy a camera for the pictures, really, and if you do too, you will notice a difference in a sony vs. a nikon. I didn't think it would be a big difference when I originally bought the a55, but I regret that choice three years ago. I've wasted hundreds of pictures IMO not using a nikon.These are all my personal experiences and opinions. I don't do anything professional with photography, I just like taking pretty pictures :) and am kind of particular I guess. I'm planning on posting this on the other cameras reviews, too, in hope of helping someone else. I have done hours, days, MONTHS of reviewing a whole lot of cameras; and ended up more confused then helped. Even now, I'm typing into google "d5200 vs d7000" :) good luck camera buyers- your probably torn between two cameras right now, and I hope this review helped.
Скромный эксперт
29.06.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
There are a lot of great reviews of this product out there. A lot of highly technical reviews and some very basic. For me the decision to purchase this camera came down to a couple of things I thought I would highlight here. I am not a professional in any sense of the word. I love to take photos and wanted a camera that would allow me to take great pictures and also allow me to think outside the "auto" box and shoot in manual, changing my settings, etc.Basically, I have been torn between Nikon and Canon for some time. This camera, in general, got better reviews than its Canon competitor (the T3i Rebel). Ultimately, books, countless websites and forums have debated this topic so I won't get into that. I could bore you with technical details, but sometimes simpler is better. If you are not a pro and just want to take some fun quality pictures, this Review is for you. Not only was this camera rated highly in every single review I read, but after researching for MONTHS, I ultimately bought this Nikon. After owning it about 8 months now, here is what I know:1) It feels / Looks goodThe camera feels as though it is built solidly and I love the way it feels in my hand. It doesn't feel cheaply made and has a good weight to it.2) I love the scene modes / effects modesThis camera has several several scene modes like the simpler point and shoot cameras including pet, night, beach, party/indoor, sunset, dusk/dawn, candlelight, autumn, food, night portrait, and blossom. Whew that's a lot of modes! Now there's nothing more intimidating than handing this camera to a friend and asking them to take a picture of you and someone else. They are going to look at you as though you've just asked them to climb the empire state building...with one hand! But these scene modes allow you to quickly identify your scene and then shoot--or helps someone not camera inclined take a better shot. In fact, I use these modes a lot and they allow my husband (who previously ran when he heard the word camera) to take amazing photos as well. As if that were not enough, this camera also includes some effects modes including fisheye, color outline, selective color, Miniature, color sketch, and some picture control modes that let you edit photos right from the camera (risky but useful).3) The pictures are fabulous!Okay I promised not to get technical on you, but overall, the pictures the camera takes are very good. I upgraded to this from an older Canon Xti and I can tell you that the sharpness for your common photo sizes like 8 x 10, 4 x 6, and 5 x 7 will be sharp and clear... As long as you focused correctly. I found the shutter to respond quickly when taking sports shots, and the frame rate is about 4 fps which is pretty good.I should mention that the camera does not have an in body focus motor which means you will need to use lenses which supply a focus motor if you like auto focus. This will not be an issue if you are using the 18-55 mm lense that you can purchase with or comes as a part of your camera package. This may affect you if you are using old lenses. But keep in mind the old lenses will work, but you will have to focus the shot yourself.Also, the noise of your photos will increase the higher your ISO. But overall, there is a good compromise at higher ISOs between sharpness and noise---which basically means you can still take a good photo in low light wih this camera!Keep in mind that you can shoot in RAW mode (for those of us who really like to tweak our photos and get technical) but is perfectly fine shooting in JPG mode which you can edit as you wish or easily upload as is to the web.4) Movies are so-soMovies are only okay. For me not a huge deal as I bought this to take photos... But movies are easy to make although I have heard that people have complained about sound clarity issues. The output is in .mov format which is nice. But honestly, I have come to enjoy making small movies and have not had sound issues.If I had any complaint about this camera is that the menus are difficult and non intuitive to navigate. One you familiarize yourself with it, however, it becomes a non issue... But for me it was a steep learning curve coming from Canon's easy to navigate menus.Overall, this is a great camera. Where it really shines is in its overall performance and picture quality. I especially love those scenes which are not included on similar other cameras including the Canon which is ultimately why I decided on this camera. I also realized that the key to good photos lies not really in the camera so much as the person behind the camera and the lenses used to capture the shot. Get yourself a lens or two (or buy it with the 18-55mm lens which is a great overall entry lens) and get this camera. Then go out there and have some fun! This camera allows you the versatility to do a little bit of everything and the quality to capture those special moments in your life.
Скромный эксперт
21.05.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This is easily the finest camera that I've owned and I've owned some good cameras hailing back to the Minolta SRT-201. I seldom use the viewfinder and instead tend to use the high contrast and very sharp monitor built into the camera. Focus is quick and accurate with the kit lens. Pictures are bright and color is very accurate.Vibration Reduction is better than I expected. With the camera on my tripod and VR off, I can tap the tripod and see the image resonate with the vibration in the tripod. With VR on, there is no discernable shake even with the 70-300mm lens on full zoom. Quite amazing actually. I can hear the VR mechanism working but it's not loud, just quietly working it's magic.With AF and VR on, it takes a second to take an image since everything has to stabilize before the picture is taken. Turning them off and doing manual focus allows a much faster process per picture.I also purchased a Tamron 70-300mm lens and all features work perfectly with this camera, both AF and VR (which Tamron calls VC) work pretty much the same on it and the kit lens.It's worth every penny. I'd buy it again in a heartbeat. This camera makes ME smile.1 Month Update: (June 27)We have a couple of thousand shots out of this amazing camera now.About 1500 images out in nature with the 300mm zoom all the way out capturing birds in flight, nesting and doing what birds do. Sure we throw a lot of them out. Every photographer does. The image is good, it's just not of anything worth keeping. This is not a camera problem. This is a photographer problem. Using the camera more is the answer.In the last two weeks, we've experimented with an older fully manual 55mm Micro-Nikkor-P lens with the 27.5mm extension tube. It takes a little experimentation to get the exposure but the images are exquisite. I never expected to be able to put a 40 year old Nikon lens on this camera but I did and with the camera set to manual you can use this ultra modern camera very similarly to how we took pictures 40 years ago. The manufacturing quality of those old lenses is amazing. There are tens of thousands of them on the used market and available relatively inexpensively. I have just over $100 in the used macro lens and extension tube and that gives us 2:1, 1:1 to .5:1 macro ability with a focal distance measured in inches out to infinity. The Micro-Nikkor lenses have legendary Nikon quality and performance and it's not at all lost on this camera.If you've always wanted to get those close up macro shots of bugs or flowers breaking into bloom, don't shy away from those old Nikkor lenses in manual mode. They take wonderful pictures with the D5100.As a bonus, my wife wasn't really solid with learning the relationship between shutter speed, f stop and ISO until a week with the manual lens on. Now she's all over it. Because you HAVE TO LEARN to make it work at all. Depth of field now makes sense to her and now she knows how to achieve it. Or not.3 Month Update: (August 3)Just shot a wedding in Duluth and the north shore of Lake Superior. (not as the paid photographer) Two days, rehearsal, rehearsal dinner campfire/cabin, wedding and reception. Took 430 shots. Left the camera on automatic 99% of the time. About 20 shots were really great photos. About 15 of them were motion blurred, badly focused or missed target. The rest of them were acceptable shots. Nearly all of the motion blurred were from the Tamron 70-300 in full zoom. Half of those, the subject moved in the frame.Overall I'd rate it a success. Two of the photos were real winners. Pictures that told a story and caught emotion.I can't fault the camera or lenses for anything. They just worked. Very happy with the setup.I had an external flash on, the Nikon SB-400 AF Speedlight. I also had the diffuser for it from Stofen, the OM-400. This flash was really not up to the task for a big room like a church. Thankfully the room was well lit. For smaller rooms around 30 x 20 or less, the flash and diffuser was excellent. The room really needs a white ceiling for the diffuser to work properly since it directs a lot of light up at a 45 degree angle. I took nearly all of the church interior pictures hand held with no flash and let the VR lenses do their magic. I got a lot of good shots from the balcony with the 70-300 lens and the camera balanced on the railing.Outdoor pictures near dusk in low outdoor lighting came out way better than any camera I've had in the past. Until it got dark enough to simply not support picture taking, the dusk pictures pretty much look like the daytime pictures. The D5100 really is amazing in low light conditions.Battery life was very good. I went through two batteries in the camera. I'm sure the external flash helped battery life. I can't speak to battery life in the flash since I recharged them once that night and can't tell how far they were run down. The flash always recharged VERY quickly.Wrap Up:Cameras take images. Photographers take pictures. The Nikon D5100 is way more capable t
Скромный эксперт
08.12.2013
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
First of all, this camera takes very good pictures, which is the main reason I bought it. Given the price, 5 STARS for image quality, features and convenience of use.Second, I got the body (no kit lenses, which seem to have pretty mediocre ratings from users), along with the Nikon 35mm f/1.8G AF-S DX (5+ STARS) and the Nikon 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR AF-S DX (4+ STARS for athletic events). I later added a AF-S DX NIKKOR 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED (5+ STARS) and the 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 ED VR (4 STARS, but a great snapshot lens).So far so good. Why only 3 STARS? Here's what I don't like.Autofocus hunts a lot sometimes, especially in marginal light. It doesn't seem to matter what lens is on the camera, so I assume it's the body. It's not a problem most of the time, but occasionally you can lose a shot because the camera is trying to figure out what to look at.The video feature, while not at all my priority, is pretty primitive as far as settings go. The major problem, however, is autofocus again, which can suddenly in the middle of a video start radically seeking focus, moving way in and out before settling back down. Occasionally, the camera will lose focus altogether. Manual focus works best, but is not always practical. Setting the camera's focus on the center point also works a little better, but the camera keeps wanting to shift to some other point in the frame and you have to keep resetting it (I haven't been able to figure out how to defeat this tendency).My last point of dissatisfaction emerged this weekend and may be the most serious. After a week's uneventful shooting, I downloaded the images, cleared the card, changes lenses and charged the battery. When I turned the camera back on, it gave the dreaded "Error press shutter release button again" message, which apparently is no rare experience for this or a number of other Nikon cameras. Of course, pressing the shutter release button again accomplishes nothing. After losing a weekend's use of the camera, I was all ready to ship it back to Nikon when I stumbled on a forum post, [...] (scroll down until you come to "Rico" and be sure to look at his subsequent posts). CAUTION: there are many reasons for this error, not all of which can be solved by the solution offered in this post, and there are some other DIY solutions out there that seem absolutely nutty to me. To cut to the chase, my problem was my mirror had jammed in the down position against what is supposed to be a stop. Some gentle prying (not for the faint of heart) freed the mirror and the camera has been working since. This design or engineering flaw has really left a bad impression.So 5 STARS for image quality and basic functionality, less one star for autofocus difficulties (especially video) and less one big star for design and reliability.I'm probably being generous.
Скромный эксперт
06.01.2012
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This camera has been an outstanding upgrade from my Nikon D60, which was my first dSLR after having used point-and-shoot cameras. The D60 was a great camera entry-level dSLR when I bought it in 2008, but the more I used it, the more I became aware of its limitations. The biggest issue I had with the D60 was its low-light performance. Even with an add-on flash and reasonably good ambient lighting, there were too many indoor shots that simply didn't look very good. Cranking up the ISO helped with exposure, but it introduced too much digital noise. When a camera's inherent technological limitations are keeping you from getting the shots you want, it's time to look at alternatives.I looked at both the D5100 and the Canon EOS Rebel T3i 18 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera and DIGIC 4 Imaging with EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Lens, because they are closely matched in terms of price, features, and performance. Both cameras get very good reviews. You can Google "Nikon D5100 and Canon T3i" and see for yourself: most review sites give them almost identical overall scores, citing certain strengths and advantages for each camera. I was considering the Canon because I only had my Nikon 18-55mm kit lens and my Nikon SB-400 flash, so I didn't have a huge investment in the Nikon line-up. While the list price of the two cameras is similar, it was much easier to find really good discount prices on the T3i, and there are also more options for buying the T3i body with several different kit lens options (as of this writing, Nikon is only offering the D5100 with the same 18-55mm kit lens that I had from my D60).However, there was one thing about the T3i that I didn't like. The main control on the back of the T3i (Nikon calls it the multi-selector; I'm not sure what Canon calls it) is placed lower on the camera than on the D5100, which means that you have to move your thumb down to access it. Ergonomically, this didn't work as well for me as Nikon's more central placement of this control. The advantage of Canon's placement is that it leaves space for a bigger thumb grip at the upper right corner of the camera. However, since the multi-selector is the primary way you access the camera's menus to adjust settings, I preferred Nikon's placement. This is such a subjective decision that it's important for a buyer to go to a retail store, handle both cameras, and see for him or herself.The other thing that made me choose the Nikon is my goal to eventually upgrade to the Nikon 18-200mm lens. As far as I can tell, there is no equivalent lens in the Canon line-up.I also looked at the Nikon D7000 16.2MP DX-Format CMOS Digital SLR with 3.0-Inch LCD (Body Only), but at $1,199 for just the body, I couldn't justify the expense. Besides the fact that it's almost twice as much as the D5100, I still prefer the smaller size and lighter weight of the D5100, which has a form factor that is almost identical to the D60. If you routinely use longer lenses or prefer a larger camera, the D7000 is very impressive and would be an excellent choice.I've been very happy with the D5100. It offers higher ISOs than the D60 and you can use them without adding noise to your images. It performs much better in low-light shooting situations, which was my main reason for upgrading in the first place. Even with flash, my indoor photos are more evenly exposed, without the washed-out foregrounds and dark backgrounds that I was getting with the D60. The menu system is similar to the D60, but I find it more intuitive and easier to navigate. I also like the controls and buttons better on the D5100.One major upgrade that the D5100 offers over the D60 is high-definition video recording. The D60 had no video recording at all. I have only used this feature on the D5100 for a few quick tests, but for anyone interested in video, this is a major addition.The D5100 also has an articulated LCD display, which is larger than the D60's. The Live View feature allows you to shoot photos using the LCD instead of the viewfinder. This feature might be handy if you wanted to shoot with the camera above or below your own position (for example, taking photos over the heads of a crowd). Instead of aiming and hoping you get your shot, you can use the articulated LCD to view what you are shooting. The same is true if you want to shoot with the camera aiming directly down. Instead of leaning over the camera to look through the viewfinder, and perhaps casting your shadow on the image, you can use the LCD to compose your shot.In Live View, the LCD also allows you to view the effects of various white balance settings on a shot you're about to take. I haven't found that the white balance as shown on the LCD before shooting is exactly the same as what I get after I shoot, but it is helpful to give you an idea of what to expect.Several things to keep in mind if you buy this camera:1. Update the firmware, as there are reported issues with the camera having trouble with certain SanDisk
Скромный эксперт
04.10.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Let me start of by saying that I love cameras and photography, I consider it as a way of expressing myself when you can't describe a situation with words, an image can speak a thousand!!(A short rambling about the cameras I owned - Skip to the next paragraph for the review)So, I got a hotshot flashless camera (Rs.200 in 1993) as a kid which took a film roll and would allow me to click 24 shots (broad sunlight required for anything to appear on the photo - even indoor pictures appear very dark). Then I decided I had to get a camera with flash. So, I saved my pocket money and got a camera worth Rs.500 in 1998 (this camera let me click 36 photos - standard film roll) which I enjoyed for a while and then came the zoom cameras and I instantly wanted one. So, I took my savings of Rs.6500 and got the Yashica zoom camera in 2002, believe me it had an infrared remote! On getting busy with college, I ended up on a break with photography. Then, In 2010 came to the US for my masters and decided I had to get the super zoom cameras with certain manual settings. So, got the Kodak Z981 ($200 - 2010 BlackFriday) and enjoy the camera till date. The only complain I have about it is that it is extremely bad in low light conditions. So, I only could dream of clicking those awesome pictures you find on the internet. I again got busy with studies and work that I could not think of pursuing my hobby. Now, I finally got some time and I decided to try some dslr's out and started with the Sony alpha A57 (Instant Love) but found out that the low light performance was kinda bad through reviews. Then, started showing interest in Canon T3. Somehow, Nikon was my last choice. But, I just wanted to give it a try before I bought any camera and tried out the D3100 at a local store. This is when I really started liking Nikon (Best in class for lowlight situations) and I think there was an interest for low light photography buried deep inside of me when I was a kid ( just the fact that my first camera was not able to click in low light). So, this is when I started reading reviews and blogs and what not!! I rekindled my inner desire for photography.I decided I wanted something more professional than the D3100 and the professional full frame cameras intimidated me and that is when I decided I had to get the D5100 which is perfect for me and for my needs on the long run!! Believe me, I enjoy every thing about this camera. This is the best camera I ever had and its now helping me capture very precious shots that I could only dream of, Its making them come true!! If you are really into manual modes and want the perfect gear without being intimidated by the so called professional cameras, I say go for the D5100!! Suits the Budget, Serves the Need!!
Скромный эксперт
15.12.2011
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
If your number one priority is image quality, especially in low-light situations, and your budget is at $800 or lower, get this camera. It has the same Sony sensor found in the Nikon D7000, and I suspect it's similar to the highly regarded ones in the Sony Alpha 580 and Nex 5N. As the reviewers at dpreview.com stated: "At low ISO settings, the D5100 is on a par with the best of the competition, but at the higher ISO settings, it produces some of the best image quality that we've ever seen from an APS-C camera." Tests from DXOMark and reviews from several other sites confirm this assessment.I had a Canon t2i for about a week, but returned it in favor of this camera, and I'm very pleased with that decision. That's not to say that the Canon t2i and t3i (which share the same sensor and have very similar image output) are necessarily sub par. In many respects, they are superior, but it depends on what's most important to you and what you plan on doing with the camera.Here's a comparison between the D5100 and t2i/t3i, cameras that are competing for the same customers.D5100 ADVANTAGES- IMAGE QUALITY, especially at higher ISO's. The camera has a larger sensor than the t3i and fewer pixels per square centimeter. And when it has noise, it's more of the grainy type (which I prefer) than the blotchy, JPG artifact kind (which is what I got from the t2i). Being able to use photos taken at 3200 and even 6400 ISO means faster shutter speeds at lower lights, which is essential for someone like me who has kids and wants to be able to take photos indoors without using the flash. As I mentioned above, the D5100 likely has the best sensor of any APS-C camera currently available.- NICER KIT LENS. The picture quality isn't necessarily better (although the t3i's larger sensor will show more of the imperfections of a lower quality lens than the D5100's and the kit lens is definitely a low quality lens compared to the other offerings in either the Canon or Nikon line), but the build at least feels better. The movement on the zoom and focus rings were much less smooth on the t2i, especially when going from 24 to 18mm. This might not matter for functionality and durability, but it bothered me quite a bit, and that matters since I'm not planning on getting a nicer kit lens for quite some time.- BETTER BUILD/FITS NICER IN HANDS. This is very subjective, but the t2i's body felt cheap in my hands and was harder to hold. The t3i's body has been altered just a bit to improve the ease of holding it, but the plastic is the same as the t2i. In addition, the spot on my t2i where you're supposed to put your right thumb would give a bit when I pressed on it and make a small sound. I've read accounts of the t2i surviving drops and other mishaps that would have killed off lesser cameras. I also like the feel of the rubber on the Nikon better. Now, maybe how the plastic feels and whether it gives in a spot or two don't really matter as far as durability is concerned, but if you're using the camera regularly, you want to like how it feels in your hands. I should add that many reviewers prefer the feel of the Canon over the Nikon, so on this point, you'll just have to try the cameras out yourself.- SHUTTER DURABILITY. The D5100's shutter is tested at 100,000 cycles. That doesn't mean that every D5100 will last that long, but at least they provide evidence that it should. Canon doesn't do the same test (or at least post the results) for the t3i. They claim it's because it's not a guarantee of shutter durability, but I've found websites that allow users to enter in when their shutter stops working or if it's continuing to work, and Nikons were usually superior than Canons on these tests, especially among the lower end models.- CUSTOMIZATION/POST-EDITING. I feel like I was able to customize many more of the settings in the D5100 than the t2i, especially settings that affected how the camera processed the JPEGs (such as the color, sharpness, contrast, etc. of the image). There are also a lot of options for editing photos in the camera after taking them, such as correcting for chromatic aberration and barrel distortion. If you mostly use shareware photography software (like Picasa and Gimp), then having these in camera editing options might be important.- LONGER BATTERY LIFE. I didn't have both cameras long enough to really say which had better batter life, but on paper, the D5100's battery is supposed to last 50% longer.CANON T2i/3i ADVANTAGES- FASTER AUTO FOCUS. The auto focus was slighter faster in the t2i, especially in low light conditions. I find that the D5100 has to have one of it's auto focus points on some sort of contrasting spot in low light conditions. The D5100 does have an AF lamp, but it's so bright that it's not reasonable to use in settings with human subjects in the photo.- QUICK ACCESS TO SETTINGS. Although the D5100 is very customizable, it can take several clicks to change the most basic settings, such as
Скромный эксперт
29.12.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Hi everyone,I am new in the DSLR world and Nikon D5100 is my first camera of that kind.Like many, I guess - I did a lot of research before I buy this camera. I was looking for something that will meet my needs, something for my level of “professionalism” and something that will be easy to learn.And I am glad that I did the right choice. This camera is that and so much more.One of the first things that will help you to understand your camera is the menu. Is simple and self-explanatory. As well as the manual.I am type of person who doesn’t want to shoot at “auto” mode (that was the reason I switched from point-and-shoot cameras), so I am playing a lot with the Professional modes (M,A,S, P). Do understand all this modes better; I was using the book “Nikon D5100 – From Snapshots To Great Shots”, by Rob Sylvan.Although the manual that comes with the camera, as I said, is doing a great job – this is also a “must have book” for this camera.It’s free to download in PDF version.It’s not easy to adjust the proper settings at various situations, tough…but with good practice, your Nikon will deliver excellent photos. I purchased this camera together with 18-55 kit lens. And I expected to be heavier that they actually are, but no…the camera body fits perfectly in your arms.The photo quality is excellent (I put my setting to shoot large files) and the HD Video as well. I was really surprised by the microphone – I guess I am used to my microphone from point-and-shoot cameras, so I was happy to find that this one actually records perfect audio.The truth is, I cannot compare this camera with any other from this kind. Like I said, it’s my first.But for the money wise, quality of photos and the kit lenses – it’s just perfect.Also, the flip screen was one of the reasons I decide for this camera ( I found out that not many cameras have this) – which is very helpful when shooting from ground level (which I do)As you will read in many books and magazines (which I highly recommend when buying this kind of camera) – the camera itself will not make you better photographer. Playing with it, practicing and spending time behind it, however – it will.I hope my review helped to someone who is in dilemma what to buy.When I will became an expert in few months & years, I will write again :)Cheers!
Показаны отзывы 1-8 из 1334.
Где купить
Цифровой Фотоаппарат Nikon D5
|
Тейл-спиннер циклоп ESOX 20 гр. | Яндекс Маркет | 529 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
Фотоаппарат Nikon D5100 Kit 18-55mm VR, черный | Яндекс Маркет | 39 900 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
Фотоаппарат Nikon D5100 Kit 18-55mm VR, черный | Яндекс Маркет | 39 900 ₽ | Посмотреть |
|
Фотоаппарат Nikon D5100 Kit 18-105mm VR, черный | Яндекс Маркет | 49 976 ₽ | Посмотреть |
График изменения цены Nikon D5
Характеристи Nikon D5
Информация о характеристиках носит справочный характер.
Перед покупкой уточняйте характеристики и комплектацию товара у продавца
Обзоры и руководства на Nikon D5
Похожие товары с лучшей оценкой
Wizemart © 2026.
Рекомендательная система по умному выбору товаров по отзывам и рейтингам
