Отзывы о Жесткий диск Western Digital 750 ГБ WD7501AALS
478 отзывов пользователей o Western Digital 750 ГБ WD7501AALS
Пользовались
Western Digital 750 ГБ WD7501AALS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор
im.jesterhead
23.10.2010
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
- + типа скоростной
- - шум, скрежет, цена не скажу что оправдана
купил что бы индекс винды выше был, до этого...
wulfi72
20.10.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Быстрота ,надежность
- - Греется
Работает непрерывно почти год(8 с лишним тыс.часов)Замечаний ни по каким...
Скроменый эксперт
17.09.2010
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- + Достаточно быстрый, несильно горячий.
- - Эх! Он не выдержал и 3 часа.
Чистый брак.
После полного форматирования в один раздел на 750Gb появился 1 бэд-блок...
Odessa Inferno
30.04.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Взял на файлопомойку в качестве расширения, работает 24/7 с охлаждением
- - Не выявлены
Была необходимость выведения файлов на отдельный винт, взял этот - очень доволен. За пол года использования всё в норме. Крутится под управлением 2008 сервера с гигабитной сеткой (винт используется без защиты (криптографии); нагруженность диска малая да и резервное питание, т.ч. на счёт сбоев сказать ничего не могу - идеальные...
Скроменый эксперт
23.07.2010
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- + Быстрый. Недорогой. Надёжность в порядке.
- - ОЧЕНЬ ШУМНЫЙ. Скрежечет и цокает как-будто ему уже лет пять.
Жёсткие диски Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 по сравнению с WD Black - абсолютно бесшумны.
Как человек занимающийся сборкой ПК, рекомендую брать всё-же Seagate (только не 11 серию). WD по качеству и стабильности схож с Seagate, за исключением шумности.
Скроменый эксперт
08.12.2009
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- + Цена за мегабайт
- - Шумный, горячий, ненадежный
Купил 8 таких хардов в RAID массив. Через 2 месяца эксплуатации при переназначении дисков в массиве один из хардов сказал "дзынь", и при попытке провести на другом компе тест на MHDD просто не определился.
После чего MHDD были проверены остальные диски. У еще одного из них - 7 reallocated sectors.
Стояли в сервере, охлаждались хорошо. Тем не менее, при открытом корпусе, когда нет воздушного потока, греются очень! сильно,...
После чего MHDD были проверены остальные диски. У еще одного из них - 7 reallocated sectors.
Стояли в сервере, охлаждались хорошо. Тем не менее, при открытом корпусе, когда нет воздушного потока, греются очень! сильно,...
Солунин Никита
26.11.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Быстрый, температура низкая, в паре и RAID 0 скорость выросла 14%. Объем достойный и конечно цена, в соотношении цена/качество.
- - Недостаток - это отсутствие таковых.
Почитал отзывы, все жалуются на шум. А что вы хотели, за скорость надо платить. Дополнителными деньгами или шумом. Любые высокопроизводительные комплектующие шумят...
Скроменый эксперт
05.02.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Быстрый и не дорогой.
- - Шумный при высокиой нагрузке, при просмотре фильма не шумит.
Отличный винт, высокие скорости, но есть глюк: на мат.плате Asus P5K WS определяется только со второго...
BroxyRus
28.09.2009
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- + По чисто теоритическим характеристикам, самый быстрый в сравнении с любыми аналогами.
- - Первый и самый главный - он бракованный! В тестировании MHDD, пройдя лишь 12%, уже получил ~7500!!! "цветных блоков" и 3 UNC (Uncorrect Data). В общем, средняя скорость доступа сравнима с обыкновенной дешевой флешкой. К тому же, от этого харда сильнейшая вибрация по...
Алиева Виктория
11.11.2009
2/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- + быстро перешли в недостатки
- - нестабильность
Со временем компьютер стал работать медленнее, но это не самое страшное: в один прекрасный день жесткий диск стал издавать скрежет и через часов 10 просто отключился и перестал...
Бойков Михаил
19.11.2009
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- + Шустрый
- - Хрюкает когда что либо читает, в режиме ожидания вроде тихо.
до этого были 2 сигейта по 250 Гб , работали тихо...
grishankov vadim
21.08.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Быстрый, большая емкость
- - в некачественных корпусах будет ощутима вибрация.
в корпусе GMC K1 2xWD7501AALS вибрации почти не заметно.шум минимальный, при поиске много тише снятого WD150ADFD (10 000об/мин)...
Скроменый эксперт
06.08.2009
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
- + Скорость цена небольшая температура
- - шум
Хочу поделиться своим опытом использования этого диска. Первый день безмерно радовался - скорость хороша, температуры в норме, объема хватает. но ночное...
Скроменый эксперт
02.09.2009
4/10
Оценка пользователя
Ужасно
- + Скорость действительно не плохая. Объем.
- - Скрипит и шумит при работе, при простое все нормально, в сц сказали что это для него вполне нормально,...
Чикеев Андрей
30.07.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Отличный HDD. Быстрая скорость работы, большой буфер, низкий уровень шума!
- - Только положительные эмоции!
Купил хард на смену поломанному Seagate ST3640323AS,...
Пехтерев Алексей
18.07.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
- + Скорость.Объем.Буфер.Качество.
- - Немного греется, на него можно поставить охлаждение (можно даже дешевое).
На этом диске стоит...
Скроменый эксперт
15.01.2010
6/10
Оценка пользователя
Плохо
WARNING: in certain RAID configurations these WD desktop series drives will frequently get flagged FAILED due to Western Digital - specific issue with TLER setting causing conflict as to whether error handling should be undertaken by the hard drive or by the RAID controller. Please parse search string "TLER" on Wikipedia for more information. Parse words like "TLER locked raid failure" (without quotes) into Google and it will return countless links to PC forum threads on this matter.Yes, I do acknowledge Western Digital, like most HDD manufacturers, does NOT endorse their desktop (non "enterprise") series drives such as the Caviar Blacks for use in RAID configurations. For RAID use, they assume the HDD will see heavy duty cycle in an "enterprise" (file server, or similar) environment, so for RAID use they push you to their much HIGHER COST drives on basis they have designed those with higher reliability (such as improved MTBF) required for enterprise duty cycles. However, home PC "enthusiasts" have generally had no significant reliability problems in using desktop series drives (from other manufactures!) to create RAIDs for typical home PC environment - assuming here home use means a VERY LOW DUTY CYCLE compared to an "enterprise" (file server, or similar) 24x7 environment.However, Western Digital has now moved from merely "advising against" to now somewhat maliciously LOCKING the TLER feature as DISABLED making the HDD INCOMPATIBLE (= very unreliable) when used in certain RAID configurations. They did this to FORCE you to use only their expensive enterprise series drives for any RAID.Western Digital burned us, sometime in late 2009, when they abruptly changed the firmware so that all versions of these drives now shipping have the Time-Limited Error Recovery (TLER) setting permanently LOCKED with TLER READ and TLER WRITE both set as DISABLED, so the WDTLER.EXE utility no longer works to toggle TLER to ENABLED. In order to use these drives in a RAID you want to set TLER to ENABLED, but you can no longer do that by any method.Western Digital never warned anyone of that firmware change, and doesn't even include a packing slip with the drive warning us these drives can no longer be used in RAID.If you dig and dig, you'll eventually find buried in obscure area of the WD website their warning:"Western Digital manufactures desktop edition hard drives and RAID Edition hard drives. Each type of hard drive is designed to work specifically in either a desktop computer environment or a demanding enterprise environment. If you install and use a desktop edition hard drive connected to a RAID controller, the drive may not work correctly...."This is reported to affect ALL of their desktop series drives (shipping late 2009, or later).With my PC, the frequency at which these drives would get dropped from my RAID was also influenced by my operating system setup. Initially, I configured my RAID using motherboard-based Intel® X58 / ICH10R with Intel Matrix Storage Manager; however, the problem was NOT that I was using such a "software motherboard-based" RAID. Apparently what made the Caviar Blacks drop from the RAID on a weekly basis was that for unrelated reasons, I had installed Vista 64-bit with a Mandarin language support configuration that for some reason prevented certain key MS updates from installing.When I did properly reload Vista so it picked up all the key updates, then the frequency of dropped drives was much lower (less then once a month) for Caviar Blacks. Plus I soon went to Windows 7 64-bit. Still there were dropped drives.So now I'll tell what completely eliminated issue of RAID mistakenly marking HDD's as FAILED due to this TLER error handling conflict:SOLUTION: I replaced all my desktop series Western Digital Caviar Blacks with Hitachi's desktop series Deskstar 7K3000, choosing the 2TB model of the 7K3000 series : HDS723020BLA642. Problem solved.And for you RAID purists who are going to flame me for using software-based RAID: yes I did eventually reconfigure for hardware RAID, in my case buying the LSI MegaRAID SAS 9260-8iIn closing, I'll share a very surprising Lessons-Learned I experienced in web-researching HDD reliability: the perception of HDD reliability versus manufacturer you'll get from a SURFACE browse through web forums is nearly OPPOSITE of what you'll learn from a very thorough fact-based read of objective reports on this subject.THIS is the kind of study you should read: [...]Yes, that's just one data point, but it is a VALUABLE data point because of the large sample size set of field return data. Next go surf the web and find another half dozen real world large sample studies just like that. That's what I did. What you'll find are strong CONSISITENCIES between completely unrelated independant studies in terms of how they ranked HDD manufacturers on actual real world use HDD failure rates. You parse those consistencies across those large sample studies, now you are finally cutting through the
Скроменый эксперт
26.07.2009
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
UPDATE August, 2010:I am amending my review for the WD Black 1TB 32MB Cache "Firmware Rev 05.00K05" HD's tonight because I've been quietly buying masses of them from Amazon.com, a total of 60+ of them through my account and my company account since I wrote this review, into August 2010, and the packaging at Amazon.com has improved 100% in the past year, so much so that all recent HD's have been sent in new, clean, strong HD-specific boxes with "T-Mount Fittings" for HD suspension, a box within a box, with air bladders, without fail in all my recent shipments. This adequately packages the HD's for transport, and I see no reason to continue to call Amazon.com down on its shipping practices for OEM HD's, as they have learned their lessons well it turns out and remedied the shipping problems with their OEM HD's 100% in 2010.This isn't to say things couldn't be improved because they can be improved: Amazon.com could use foam inserts in the boxes to protect against static electricity and other impact damages which the hard cardboard mounting doesn't protect against, so please take note of that idea also...it is encouraging to see the good packaging, however, with all recent Western Digital Black 1TB HD shipments, and Amazon.com is to be commended for changing its ways and trying to do the customer right with adequate packing for all HD shipments in 2010, at least with my accounts it's improved to this status. This should be noted by people reading this review and others that were critical of Amazon.com packaging of OEM HD's in the past, especially 2009, a year where Amazon.com didn't fare well with criticism from most customers about their OEM HD packaging and protection during shipments.In addition there has been a post above where one person is commenting about WD changing the firmware in the OEM WD Black HD's to make them incompatible with RAID use, and that is patently false, and is NOT TO BE BELIEVED! All WD Black 1TB HD's that I have been purchasing this year, and last year, are 100% compatible with RAID arrays, any sort of RAID array, and with hardware RAID controller use, as I have built many systems this year utilizing WD Black OEM 1TB RAID setups, with and without hardware RAID controllers, and they are 100% compatible, no disclaimers necessary at all for that fact, and any claim to the contrary cannot be believed. PROVE IT TO ME if you want to publish such commentary, because up to now that whole idea is just plain uninformed, misconceived thinking, and it needs to be taken down from this web site because people will believe stupid claims like that, given the chance.Wavey Davey - August 23, 2010____ _____ _____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ ___ ___ ___I have been waiting to review my six (6) WD Black 1TB 32MB Cache SATA 2 HD's because I wanted to establish a track record with them, a baseline, since I am using them in two distinctly different RAID mediums. In any case, the SATA HD's are working fantastic in RAID 5 and RAID 0 for me and my newest PC build. Let me digress a little and I'll rate the HD's after I tell you how I am using them.I have four (4) in a FirmTek SeriTek 2eEN4 4-Bay HotSwap RAID Enclosure as my primary "write-to" HD system for video and sound projects, in a RAID 5, so total space available in RAID 5 is 3TB. A RAID 5 uses speed and redundancy so it's an ideal medium for film or audio, as it "saves" one HD as a "spare drive" in the array, just in case of a single HD failure, and will replace that failed drive with the "saved" drive instantly so that you never lose data, or hardly ever. You'd have to have 2 HD's out of the 3 fail to lose data with RAID 5, at least in theory this is the case.The RAID 5 is connected to an Areca 1680IX-8 SAS to eSATA/SATA Hardware RAID Controller in the PC, and it's got a rudimentary installation of Vista 64-bit Ultimate on it to make it bootable, also. That's correct, I can boot the PC externally using the RAID 5 if necessary, and I do when I am building a film project from scratch if you must know the application's benefits. The RAID 5 writes at more than 405MB/sec, and reads at more than 430MB/sec with an empty volume to give you some perspective on "Hardware RAID" versus software, or system-bus RAID on an internal volume, so there is quite a benefit with the Areca 1680IX-8 controller in place.The second use for my WD Black SATA 2 HD's is as the boot system for the PC 90% of the time, as I have two (2) of the HD's mounted internally in the PC, still pushed by the Areca controller for hardware RAID 0 inside the case also. I have all of my main applications like Photoshop CS3, Illustrator 11, etc+ my web browser, Outlook, Mail, on this HD system, as it suffices to drive the PC most of the time, but for when I use the external RAID 5 and am involved in a film project. The 2TB RAID 0 (c.1.8TB formatted) gets your attention right away, as it's much faster than a system bus RAID 0 could ever be with the hardware cont
Скроменый эксперт
12.04.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
WD blacks are hands down the champ of 1 TB drives for gaming and fast loads. It's not as fast as some other drives out there, but it's a great value and these drives are very reliable.
Скроменый эксперт
10.07.2010
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
This highly advanced and high performance 2 TB Western Digital performs extremely well so far. The most unique feature of this drive is the off platter parking and locking when powered down. With this feature, the platters are not likely to suffer shock damages from the heads pounding from rough handling while being shipped. Speaking about shipping, Amazon.com as well as many other online retailer should do a better job of packaging OEM hard drives for shipping. My drive was shipped double boxed with the outer box slightly larger with an airbag pillow on one end. The inner box appear to be supplied by Western Digital with two plastic cushioning inserts on the ends and does appear to be adequate. The outer box practically does not offer any more protection from shock damages. The outer box should have been large enough to be fitted with some foam cushioning all around. The other desirable feature that this drive has is that it has dual processors and dual activators for the heads for precise tracking. The secondary activator utilizes piezoelectric technology to really fine tune in on the exact track on the platter quietly. This of course improved performance somewhat.I purchased this hard drive to use for additional storage on my computer. Because of the high-performance nature I feel this hard drive also makes an excellent boot drive for Windows. Of all the hard drive I ever purchase, it also produced the least amount of vibration when on. It's about as quiet as my Seagate hard drives. The only difference is that it makes the clunk sound occasionally when powered down when the heads park and lock. I'm paranoided from experience with my last two Seagate hard drive purchase that had growing reallocated section count shortly after placed in service. To make sure that I have a sound drive, right after installation I ran Western Digital's own Data Iifeguard For Windows to check for bad sections by running the complete surface scan. This software can be downloaded from Western Digital website. . I also ran a surface scan on this drive using HD Sentinel Pro. Both tests passed with no problems.Final thoughts: Because this Western Digital is better engineered than any of my previous hard drive, my hope is for longtime reliability. So far I'm fully impressed with the performance I have been receiving. When I ran a benchmark, the maximum read speed was almost 140 MB per second and the minimum was around 70 MB per second. Take for example when transferring files from one hard drive to another. I did an experiment on copying files on copying files from my old storage drive to my new drive. When the file is copy single file at a time the speed remains almost full of around 100 MB per second. But when I copy two files at the same time, the speed chokes down to around 25 MB per second for the two files. I try again on copying two files accept at this time, one file gets copied to the new drive and the other file is copied to my boot drive. The speed also get choked down again to around 25 MB per second for the two files. This proves in a way that the bottleneck is on my old storage drive.I tried this transferring test again except the new drive is the source this time. I copied one file to my old storage drive as well as copying another file to my boot drive at the same time. Only this time the speed remains the same on whether I copy one file or copying two or more files at the same time. The transfer speed remains close to 100 MB per second whether copying one file or two files at the same time.
Скроменый эксперт
20.12.2012
8/10
Оценка пользователя
Хорошо
Works as I expected - but takes a while to wake up from sleeping. That could be because it is 2TB, or because it is the Green, low power, version. It works though and has been able to hold my media library. It is a great solution and I have been happy with it.I do wish that the warranty was longer though. 1 year just isn't quite enough that I have warm fuzzies with this drive.
Скроменый эксперт
26.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
I take HDD quality very seriously. It's my data at stake. WD is my drive of choice. The price is right and the quality is high. You can get drives in the WD line that will match your durability to price needs.
Скроменый эксперт
14.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
Purchased a few years ago, had no problems since. Works fast and great space for the money. Totally would recommend on a budget build
Скроменый эксперт
04.01.2013
10/10
Оценка пользователя
Великолепно
ALWAYS HAD BEST LUCK WITH WD HD. NEVER HAD ANY ISSUES AND THIS ITEM IS STILL BEING USED TODAY WITH GOOD RESULTS.
Показаны отзывы 25-48 из 478.
