У нас 28 179 363 отзывов

на 556 023 товаров

Отзывы о Жесткий диск Western Digital 750 ГБ WD7501AALS

479 отзывов пользователей о Western Digital 750 ГБ WD7501AALS

Пользовались Western Digital 750 ГБ WD7501AALS?
Поделитесь своим опытом и помогите другим сделать правильный выбор

Оставить свой отзыв

325

Спектр-3UNCK

09.02.2015

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

+ Неубиваемый
- На шестой год жизни сильно крехтит и и гудит по корпусу

Работает шестой год. первые 2 года был системным WinXP потом 2 года был под Linux в ext, последние 2 года работает как хранилище данных (софт фото) + TMP файлы системы и браузера дабы уберечь SSD от износа.

Данные SMART HD Tune Pro: WDC WD7501AALS-00J7B0 Health

ID Current Worst ThresholdData Status
(01) Raw Read Error Rate 200 200 51 0 ok
(03) Spin Up Time 228 224 21 8591 ok
(04) Start/Stop Count 97 97 0 3402 ok
(05) Reallocated Sector Count 200 200 140 0 ok
(07) Seek Error Rate 200 200 0 0 ok
(09) Power On Hours Count 64 64 0 26911 ok
(0A)...

источник

Сириус-3CLOM

02.06.2015

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

+ По характеристикам заявлена высокая скорость
- шум,скрежет, работает не стабильно

В сц диск вернули. Пояснили, что шум не является браком, а диск в порядке. Изначально был куплен 7500ААDS, заменен по гарантии из-за нестабильной работы. Мог не определяться вообще. Модель 7501AALS получена взамен. Не удивлюсь если отработает не долго. Уже...

источник

Сириус-0VLJS

03.10.2014

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

+ Отработал больше 5 лет, быстрый, стабильный.
- Несколько шумный, начал подыхать через 5лет - кратковременные падения скорости чтения/записи до 1...3 мб/сек.

Модель: WDC WD7501AALS-00E8B0...

источник

Сириус-4PRZR

11.11.2014

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

+ нет
- шумный, долго настраивал для NTFS

Умер на 4-й год. Не все сумел спасти. Хранил фотки.

источник

Квазар-0EOMY

15.05.2014

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

+ быстрые
- горячие (более 45 гр в работе).

Конкретно по четырем Western Digital WD7501AALS.
Стояли 4шт. в RAID-10 на файловом сервере. Работали практически непрерывно в течении трех лет. Естественно за UPSом, но пару раз питание аварийно отрубалось полностью. Также под постоянным обдувом одним 80мм вентилятором, в большом корпусе, но в тесном плохо проветриваемом помещении. Заполненность массива...

источник

НеоВояжер-7JGHY

04.01.2013

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

+ Быстрый.
- Очень шумный. Трещат головки.

У меня в компе 6 куллеров: системный задний, в БП, два фронтальных, проц и видяха. Все залманы.
Купил этот винт как системный. Через неделю сменил его временно на грин серию. Не возможно громко трещали...

источник

Спектр-5OMBU

21.02.2013

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

+ Хороший, качественный винчестер. Правда, не так, чтобы сильно тихий, и греется очень прилично.

Время наработки у него — почти 3.5 года (30000...

источник

МехаРейнджер-0WCYA

19.11.2012

1/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

+ По характеристикам заявлена высокая скорость
- шум,скрежет, работает не стабильно

источник

Аэронавт-2WCKM

28.06.2012

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

+ обычный, возможно быстрый, возможно надежный - 1,5 года пользуюсь
- Бесит скрежит особенно при записи и чтении, у меня очень тихо в доме и он сильно раздражает, так как кулер на процессоре малооборотистый (1700)и на блоке питания тоже большого диаметра, спец подбирал всё тихое....а еще он греется зараза, если на улице жара и дома за 25градусов то t уходит за 50гр. и выше, опять же придется покупать охлаждение на него, что дополнительно...

источник

Альфа-Юнит-9VBKQ

26.09.2012

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

+ Быстрый, малошумный.
- Из-за того, что контакт в шлейфе питания был сделан не достаточно доброкачественно,...

источник

Астрономад-6QDTT

07.03.2012

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

+ Быстрый,надежный,особо не тарахтит.
По сравнению с Seagate это на голову выше по качеству.
- Работает 2 года,появилась пара бэд-блоков но такое подозрение что это глюки SMART.
Греется прилично при интенсивной работе.

По сравнению с серией...

источник

Сириус-9DNBU

16.02.2012

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

+ Надежный. при наличии достойного охлаждения, температура при нагрузке не повышается выше 35 градусов.
- Шумноват, головки при позиционировании сильно "хрустят"

Использую...

источник

Сириус-6MKCR

17.06.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

+ Быстрый, большой кэш, отказоустойчив, тихий, холодный (все отзыва в сравнении с пяти накопителями равного или большего объема установленными в системе).
- В сравнении с другими накопителями с данными характеристиками,...

источник

Капеллан-9PVLJ

19.10.2010

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

+ Скорость работы достаточная для современных задач, недорогой и при этом, лично мной, в процессе эксплуатации проблем не выявлено
- Шум (страшный треск при работе и гул), медленно раскручивается при старте (например при выходе из режима сна), умеренно горячий (желателен обдув или просторный корпус)

Приобрел для установки как "основным"(вторым выступал WD 640гб серии Green), после нескольких недель эксплуатации был с позором перемещен из сред. отсека в нижнюю часть системного блока (где исходящий от него треск был не так заметен, однако и там ему не суждено было закрепиться...В ночное время явно слышен гул,исходящий из него, из-за турбулентных потоков внутри самого...

источник

Квантум-9ASTX

06.06.2011

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

+ быстрый!
- громкий когда я на с ним работал стучал как будто я по нету молотком бил! горячий! температура доходила до 60 градусов...

источник

Аэронавт-8KHZF

07.04.2011

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

+ Надежный, не дорогой, быстрый
- При записи или чтении головки громко трещат

Black серия довольно громкие в сравнении с Blue (например Western Digital...

источник

Квантум-4KPOD

04.02.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

+ Сразу определился системой.. Работает без особых задержек и прочих лагов.. Что характерно очень шустрый, особенно при записи с HDD на HDD.. Тихий
- Хз, не выявлены

Чтобы не говорили и не наводили...

источник

Вояджер-1ODTT

23.10.2010

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

+ типа скоростной
- шум, скрежет, цена не скажу что оправдана

купил что бы индекс винды выше был, до этого...

источник

Вектрон-7EFDY

20.10.2010

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

+ Быстрота ,надежность
- Греется

Работает непрерывно почти год(8 с лишним тыс.часов)Замечаний ни по каким...

источник

Гравитон-2YADY

17.09.2010

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

+ Достаточно быстрый, несильно горячий.
- Эх! Он не выдержал и 3 часа.
Чистый брак.

После полного форматирования в один раздел на 750Gb появился 1 бэд-блок...

источник

Плазмонавт-3NYUM

30.04.2010

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

+ Взял на файлопомойку в качестве расширения, работает 24/7 с охлаждением
- Не выявлены

Была необходимость выведения файлов на отдельный винт, взял этот - очень доволен. За пол года использования всё в норме. Крутится под управлением 2008 сервера с гигабитной сеткой (винт используется без защиты (криптографии); нагруженность диска малая да и резервное питание, т.ч. на счёт сбоев сказать ничего не могу - идеальные...

источник

ТерраБот-2URIZ

23.07.2010

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

+ Быстрый. Недорогой. Надёжность в порядке.
- ОЧЕНЬ ШУМНЫЙ. Скрежечет и цокает как-будто ему уже лет пять.
Жёсткие диски Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 по сравнению с WD Black - абсолютно бесшумны.

Как человек занимающийся сборкой ПК, рекомендую брать всё-же Seagate (только не 11 серию). WD по качеству и стабильности схож с Seagate, за исключением шумности.

источник

Плазмоид-5NKEG

08.12.2009

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

+ Цена за мегабайт
- Шумный, горячий, ненадежный

Купил 8 таких хардов в RAID массив. Через 2 месяца эксплуатации при переназначении дисков в массиве один из хардов сказал "дзынь", и при попытке провести на другом компе тест на MHDD просто не определился.
После чего MHDD были проверены остальные диски. У еще одного из них - 7 reallocated sectors.
Стояли в сервере, охлаждались хорошо. Тем не менее, при открытом корпусе, когда нет воздушного потока, греются очень! сильно,...

источник

Сириус-1KVIH

26.11.2009

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

+ Быстрый, температура низкая, в паре и RAID 0 скорость выросла 14%. Объем достойный и конечно цена, в соотношении цена/качество.
- Недостаток - это отсутствие таковых.

Почитал отзывы, все жалуются на шум. А что вы хотели, за скорость надо платить. Дополнителными деньгами или шумом. Любые высокопроизводительные комплектующие шумят...

источник

НеоВояжер-5CPKK

05.02.2010

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

+ Быстрый и не дорогой.
- Шумный при высокиой нагрузке, при просмотре фильма не шумит.

Отличный винт, высокие скорости, но есть глюк: на мат.плате Asus P5K WS определяется только со второго...

источник

Странник-7HMKR

28.09.2009

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

+ По чисто теоритическим характеристикам, самый быстрый в сравнении с любыми аналогами.
- Первый и самый главный - он бракованный! В тестировании MHDD, пройдя лишь 12%, уже получил ~7500!!! "цветных блоков" и 3 UNC (Uncorrect Data). В общем, средняя скорость доступа сравнима с обыкновенной дешевой флешкой. К тому же, от этого харда сильнейшая вибрация по...

источник

Капеллан-9JQGZ

11.11.2009

2/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

+ быстро перешли в недостатки
- нестабильность

Со временем компьютер стал работать медленнее, но это не самое страшное: в один прекрасный день жесткий диск стал издавать скрежет и через часов 10 просто отключился и перестал...

источник

Фотон-7XLPA

19.11.2009

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

+ Шустрый
- Хрюкает когда что либо читает, в режиме ожидания вроде тихо.

до этого были 2 сигейта по 250 Гб , работали тихо...

источник

Плазмоид-9OMBA

21.08.2009

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

+ Быстрый, большая емкость
- в некачественных корпусах будет ощутима вибрация.

в корпусе GMC K1 2xWD7501AALS вибрации почти не заметно.шум минимальный, при поиске много тише снятого WD150ADFD (10 000об/мин)...

источник

Квантум-0ORUN

06.08.2009

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

+ Скорость цена небольшая температура
- шум

Хочу поделиться своим опытом использования этого диска. Первый день безмерно радовался - скорость хороша, температуры в норме, объема хватает. но ночное...

источник

Интеллектор-3DRCS

02.09.2009

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

+ Скорость действительно не плохая. Объем.
- Скрипит и шумит при работе, при простое все нормально, в сц сказали что это для него вполне нормально,...

источник

Супернова-6XQHM

30.07.2009

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

+ Отличный HDD. Быстрая скорость работы, большой буфер, низкий уровень шума!
- Только положительные эмоции!

Купил хард на смену поломанному Seagate ST3640323AS,...

источник

Спектроник-1CXRB

18.07.2009

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

+ Скорость.Объем.Буфер.Качество.
- Немного греется, на него можно поставить охлаждение (можно даже дешевое).

На этом диске стоит...

источник

Аэронавт-8RHFG

15.01.2010

6/10

Оценка пользователя

Плохо

WARNING: in certain RAID configurations these WD desktop series drives will frequently get flagged FAILED due to Western Digital - specific issue with TLER setting causing conflict as to whether error handling should be undertaken by the hard drive or by the RAID controller. Please parse search string "TLER" on Wikipedia for more information. Parse words like "TLER locked raid failure" (without quotes) into Google and it will return countless links to PC forum threads on this matter.Yes, I do acknowledge Western Digital, like most HDD manufacturers, does NOT endorse their desktop (non "enterprise") series drives such as the Caviar Blacks for use in RAID configurations. For RAID use, they assume the HDD will see heavy duty cycle in an "enterprise" (file server, or similar) environment, so for RAID use they push you to their much HIGHER COST drives on basis they have designed those with higher reliability (such as improved MTBF) required for enterprise duty cycles. However, home PC "enthusiasts" have generally had no significant reliability problems in using desktop series drives (from other manufactures!) to create RAIDs for typical home PC environment - assuming here home use means a VERY LOW DUTY CYCLE compared to an "enterprise" (file server, or similar) 24x7 environment.However, Western Digital has now moved from merely "advising against" to now somewhat maliciously LOCKING the TLER feature as DISABLED making the HDD INCOMPATIBLE (= very unreliable) when used in certain RAID configurations. They did this to FORCE you to use only their expensive enterprise series drives for any RAID.Western Digital burned us, sometime in late 2009, when they abruptly changed the firmware so that all versions of these drives now shipping have the Time-Limited Error Recovery (TLER) setting permanently LOCKED with TLER READ and TLER WRITE both set as DISABLED, so the WDTLER.EXE utility no longer works to toggle TLER to ENABLED. In order to use these drives in a RAID you want to set TLER to ENABLED, but you can no longer do that by any method.Western Digital never warned anyone of that firmware change, and doesn't even include a packing slip with the drive warning us these drives can no longer be used in RAID.If you dig and dig, you'll eventually find buried in obscure area of the WD website their warning:"Western Digital manufactures desktop edition hard drives and RAID Edition hard drives. Each type of hard drive is designed to work specifically in either a desktop computer environment or a demanding enterprise environment. If you install and use a desktop edition hard drive connected to a RAID controller, the drive may not work correctly...."This is reported to affect ALL of their desktop series drives (shipping late 2009, or later).With my PC, the frequency at which these drives would get dropped from my RAID was also influenced by my operating system setup. Initially, I configured my RAID using motherboard-based Intel® X58 / ICH10R with Intel Matrix Storage Manager; however, the problem was NOT that I was using such a "software motherboard-based" RAID. Apparently what made the Caviar Blacks drop from the RAID on a weekly basis was that for unrelated reasons, I had installed Vista 64-bit with a Mandarin language support configuration that for some reason prevented certain key MS updates from installing.When I did properly reload Vista so it picked up all the key updates, then the frequency of dropped drives was much lower (less then once a month) for Caviar Blacks. Plus I soon went to Windows 7 64-bit. Still there were dropped drives.So now I'll tell what completely eliminated issue of RAID mistakenly marking HDD's as FAILED due to this TLER error handling conflict:SOLUTION: I replaced all my desktop series Western Digital Caviar Blacks with Hitachi's desktop series Deskstar 7K3000, choosing the 2TB model of the 7K3000 series : HDS723020BLA642. Problem solved.And for you RAID purists who are going to flame me for using software-based RAID: yes I did eventually reconfigure for hardware RAID, in my case buying the LSI MegaRAID SAS 9260-8iIn closing, I'll share a very surprising Lessons-Learned I experienced in web-researching HDD reliability: the perception of HDD reliability versus manufacturer you'll get from a SURFACE browse through web forums is nearly OPPOSITE of what you'll learn from a very thorough fact-based read of objective reports on this subject.THIS is the kind of study you should read: [...]Yes, that's just one data point, but it is a VALUABLE data point because of the large sample size set of field return data. Next go surf the web and find another half dozen real world large sample studies just like that. That's what I did. What you'll find are strong CONSISITENCIES between completely unrelated independant studies in terms of how they ranked HDD manufacturers on actual real world use HDD failure rates. You parse those consistencies across those large sample studies, now you are finally cutting through the

источник

Кронос-5FBFW

26.07.2009

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

UPDATE August, 2010:I am amending my review for the WD Black 1TB 32MB Cache "Firmware Rev 05.00K05" HD's tonight because I've been quietly buying masses of them from Amazon.com, a total of 60+ of them through my account and my company account since I wrote this review, into August 2010, and the packaging at Amazon.com has improved 100% in the past year, so much so that all recent HD's have been sent in new, clean, strong HD-specific boxes with "T-Mount Fittings" for HD suspension, a box within a box, with air bladders, without fail in all my recent shipments. This adequately packages the HD's for transport, and I see no reason to continue to call Amazon.com down on its shipping practices for OEM HD's, as they have learned their lessons well it turns out and remedied the shipping problems with their OEM HD's 100% in 2010.This isn't to say things couldn't be improved because they can be improved: Amazon.com could use foam inserts in the boxes to protect against static electricity and other impact damages which the hard cardboard mounting doesn't protect against, so please take note of that idea also...it is encouraging to see the good packaging, however, with all recent Western Digital Black 1TB HD shipments, and Amazon.com is to be commended for changing its ways and trying to do the customer right with adequate packing for all HD shipments in 2010, at least with my accounts it's improved to this status. This should be noted by people reading this review and others that were critical of Amazon.com packaging of OEM HD's in the past, especially 2009, a year where Amazon.com didn't fare well with criticism from most customers about their OEM HD packaging and protection during shipments.In addition there has been a post above where one person is commenting about WD changing the firmware in the OEM WD Black HD's to make them incompatible with RAID use, and that is patently false, and is NOT TO BE BELIEVED! All WD Black 1TB HD's that I have been purchasing this year, and last year, are 100% compatible with RAID arrays, any sort of RAID array, and with hardware RAID controller use, as I have built many systems this year utilizing WD Black OEM 1TB RAID setups, with and without hardware RAID controllers, and they are 100% compatible, no disclaimers necessary at all for that fact, and any claim to the contrary cannot be believed. PROVE IT TO ME if you want to publish such commentary, because up to now that whole idea is just plain uninformed, misconceived thinking, and it needs to be taken down from this web site because people will believe stupid claims like that, given the chance.Wavey Davey - August 23, 2010____ _____ _____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ ___ ___ ___I have been waiting to review my six (6) WD Black 1TB 32MB Cache SATA 2 HD's because I wanted to establish a track record with them, a baseline, since I am using them in two distinctly different RAID mediums. In any case, the SATA HD's are working fantastic in RAID 5 and RAID 0 for me and my newest PC build. Let me digress a little and I'll rate the HD's after I tell you how I am using them.I have four (4) in a FirmTek SeriTek 2eEN4 4-Bay HotSwap RAID Enclosure as my primary "write-to" HD system for video and sound projects, in a RAID 5, so total space available in RAID 5 is 3TB. A RAID 5 uses speed and redundancy so it's an ideal medium for film or audio, as it "saves" one HD as a "spare drive" in the array, just in case of a single HD failure, and will replace that failed drive with the "saved" drive instantly so that you never lose data, or hardly ever. You'd have to have 2 HD's out of the 3 fail to lose data with RAID 5, at least in theory this is the case.The RAID 5 is connected to an Areca 1680IX-8 SAS to eSATA/SATA Hardware RAID Controller in the PC, and it's got a rudimentary installation of Vista 64-bit Ultimate on it to make it bootable, also. That's correct, I can boot the PC externally using the RAID 5 if necessary, and I do when I am building a film project from scratch if you must know the application's benefits. The RAID 5 writes at more than 405MB/sec, and reads at more than 430MB/sec with an empty volume to give you some perspective on "Hardware RAID" versus software, or system-bus RAID on an internal volume, so there is quite a benefit with the Areca 1680IX-8 controller in place.The second use for my WD Black SATA 2 HD's is as the boot system for the PC 90% of the time, as I have two (2) of the HD's mounted internally in the PC, still pushed by the Areca controller for hardware RAID 0 inside the case also. I have all of my main applications like Photoshop CS3, Illustrator 11, etc+ my web browser, Outlook, Mail, on this HD system, as it suffices to drive the PC most of the time, but for when I use the external RAID 5 and am involved in a film project. The 2TB RAID 0 (c.1.8TB formatted) gets your attention right away, as it's much faster than a system bus RAID 0 could ever be with the hardware cont

источник

Астрон-2HRTG

12.04.2013

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

WD blacks are hands down the champ of 1 TB drives for gaming and fast loads. It's not as fast as some other drives out there, but it's a great value and these drives are very reliable.

источник

Пульсар-1TAWY

10.07.2010

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

This highly advanced and high performance 2 TB Western Digital performs extremely well so far. The most unique feature of this drive is the off platter parking and locking when powered down. With this feature, the platters are not likely to suffer shock damages from the heads pounding from rough handling while being shipped. Speaking about shipping, Amazon.com as well as many other online retailer should do a better job of packaging OEM hard drives for shipping. My drive was shipped double boxed with the outer box slightly larger with an airbag pillow on one end. The inner box appear to be supplied by Western Digital with two plastic cushioning inserts on the ends and does appear to be adequate. The outer box practically does not offer any more protection from shock damages. The outer box should have been large enough to be fitted with some foam cushioning all around. The other desirable feature that this drive has is that it has dual processors and dual activators for the heads for precise tracking. The secondary activator utilizes piezoelectric technology to really fine tune in on the exact track on the platter quietly. This of course improved performance somewhat.I purchased this hard drive to use for additional storage on my computer. Because of the high-performance nature I feel this hard drive also makes an excellent boot drive for Windows. Of all the hard drive I ever purchase, it also produced the least amount of vibration when on. It's about as quiet as my Seagate hard drives. The only difference is that it makes the clunk sound occasionally when powered down when the heads park and lock. I'm paranoided from experience with my last two Seagate hard drive purchase that had growing reallocated section count shortly after placed in service. To make sure that I have a sound drive, right after installation I ran Western Digital's own Data Iifeguard For Windows to check for bad sections by running the complete surface scan. This software can be downloaded from Western Digital website. . I also ran a surface scan on this drive using HD Sentinel Pro. Both tests passed with no problems.Final thoughts: Because this Western Digital is better engineered than any of my previous hard drive, my hope is for longtime reliability. So far I'm fully impressed with the performance I have been receiving. When I ran a benchmark, the maximum read speed was almost 140 MB per second and the minimum was around 70 MB per second. Take for example when transferring files from one hard drive to another. I did an experiment on copying files on copying files from my old storage drive to my new drive. When the file is copy single file at a time the speed remains almost full of around 100 MB per second. But when I copy two files at the same time, the speed chokes down to around 25 MB per second for the two files. I try again on copying two files accept at this time, one file gets copied to the new drive and the other file is copied to my boot drive. The speed also get choked down again to around 25 MB per second for the two files. This proves in a way that the bottleneck is on my old storage drive.I tried this transferring test again except the new drive is the source this time. I copied one file to my old storage drive as well as copying another file to my boot drive at the same time. Only this time the speed remains the same on whether I copy one file or copying two or more files at the same time. The transfer speed remains close to 100 MB per second whether copying one file or two files at the same time.

источник

КиберНаблюдатель-6OUYD

20.12.2012

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

Works as I expected - but takes a while to wake up from sleeping. That could be because it is 2TB, or because it is the Green, low power, version. It works though and has been able to hold my media library. It is a great solution and I have been happy with it.I do wish that the warranty was longer though. 1 year just isn't quite enough that I have warm fuzzies with this drive.

источник

Астрономад-7ZTZG

26.01.2013

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I take HDD quality very seriously. It's my data at stake. WD is my drive of choice. The price is right and the quality is high. You can get drives in the WD line that will match your durability to price needs.

источник

Небулоид-9VJXK

14.01.2013

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Purchased a few years ago, had no problems since. Works fast and great space for the money. Totally would recommend on a budget build

источник

Спектроник-0EOIV

04.01.2013

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

ALWAYS HAD BEST LUCK WITH WD HD. NEVER HAD ANY ISSUES AND THIS ITEM IS STILL BEING USED TODAY WITH GOOD RESULTS.

источник

Пандорец-0WCWY

23.12.2012

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I USE WESTERN DIGITAL HARD DRIVES 90% OF THE TIME, SPECIFICLY THE BLACK DRIVES. I HAVE FOUND THESE DRIVES (BLACK) TO BE VERY DURABLE.

источник

ИнфраГость-1XNOD

31.12.2010

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

Got this to work with my other identical item. Doubled storage speed and increased read performance a bit (maybe 20% so far but I'm not sure if there's more I can do to tweak). On RAID 0: make sure you have the correct RAID drivers. I clearly identified "WIN 7" as my OS but Asus gave me plenty of non-Win 7 drivers to choose from so I went with the first/most recent which ended up being WRONG. Wasn't a big deal but it ate up a few hours as I tried to follow the procedure with the wrong drivers and with a 300Gig image to transfer... there goes a few hours. The Win 7 procedure is okay-ish but plenty of opportunities to botch it: Make recovery disk, make image backup of data (kept mine on an external HDD), tell your Bios you want RAID, configure your raid (ctrl+F1 i think... it tells you when you boot up), boot from recovery, option to restore from image, install drivers, pick the RAID drivers from your storage location (again had mine on a USB drive, thumb this time) in my case I had two drivers and a RAID console... installed all three no problem. With the first set of WRONG drivers I had it gave me like 50 drivers to chose from... it took forever to do whatever it was doing and gave no indication that it correctly installed so I went on to install the rest just to see what would happen and I would get an error message. when I got the correct drivers there was still no indication of "successful install" but I never got an error message and there was only three to choose from instead of 50 so I felt a lot better), Okay, where were we... yes, now just continue to load the image with all your files/settings and VOILA, DONE!! SIMPLE, right!?!? lol.. anyways it works, just a few steps to follow. I'm sure everyone's experience is a little different. I can't tell you how happy I was to walk back into my room and see that my computer had rebooted itself and all my desktop clutter/i-net favorites and everything else was right back where it should be but now on a 1.2 TB RAID array instead of 640GB... well, that's partially true... the drives were there but I had to go right click on "Computer" from start menue and then select "manage" and adjust settings in the disk managment section... Yeah... WOOHOO more crap to do! Well after clumsily Googling and a few head scratching moments and actions that didn't work... I think I ended up extending a drive or something and then VOILA went from 640GB to 1.2 TB. No data lost, no complete reinstall of Win 7. Just an awesome nerd experience for me to share. YES!!!

источник

Аэронавт-0CXLI

29.11.2012

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

This drive is just like brand new I am going to install it in my iMac when I put it into service as a household server.

источник

Спектр-4PFZT

08.07.2011

10/10

Оценка пользователя

Великолепно

I bought this 1.5 years ago and so far have had no issues with it. Performance is pretty good, though it is a tiny bit noisy. HD Tune Pro says that the default AAM setting is 128 (low noise) - but on a performance drive how could that be? It must be reading it wrong. I set it to 254 (high performance) anyway. It makes quite a bit of difference. This drive does make some noise at times when randomly seeking (ex. booting Windows), and I can hear it even though it's in my mid-ATX case that's under the desk. Otherwise, aside from the motor running (and that's not much, it might be my Samsung drive), I can barely hear it.This drive runs a bit hotter than my Samsung, but I believe that one is not meant for performance, which this is. Right now it's 76F or so in here and the WD is at 39C, and the samsung is at 33C. I have the os and programs on the wd though, just some files on the samsung. That's a little odd though, given the Samsung is on the top drive bay and this WD is on the bottom (one free bay inbetween them).Given the luck I've had with WD drives, I'm expecting this to last for quite a while. Of course, the 5 year warranty should help if I ever have an issue.Although SATA 2 is typical, I'm really not sure why they bother given a spinning hard disk cannot saturate the bandwidth of SATA 1 (in theory anyway).Anyway, this is a good drive and I'd definitely buy another one if I needed it (maybe higher capacity though). $70 for 640GB isn't too great when you can get 2TB drives for less than $100. They are significantly slower drives though. I bet the $80 WD Caviar Green 2TB doesn't compare with performance.

источник

Супернова-7WMJB

10.05.2012

4/10

Оценка пользователя

Ужасно

Okay so i received my hard drive in the mail today, and it was packaged in a small priority Envelope, once single piece of packing paper around it for shielding. Really you couldn't spend 1.50 more and get a small box and pack it better. your shipping a HARD DRIVE!!!they are very temperamental, you cant ship them like that without the proper packing...Im just flabbergasted that you really sent me my hard drive like this. i am really amazed. Other than that i will try out the hard drive tonight or tomorrow to see if it works. i hoping for the best.

источник

Астрон-3PWCQ

11.05.2011

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I have been looking for a pair of drives (primary/clone) for an aging server for preventive maintenance purposes. The server is 5 or 6 years old and has been running without issue having a Maxtor DiamondMax 10 80GB 8MB cache 1.5Gb/s SATA (SATA-150) system drive. There have not been any issues whatsoever, yet with drive prices declining, capacities increasing along with performance it seemed like a no-brainer to upgrade/replace the drive. I leaned towards WD Black because I need reliability and performance - again, this drive seemed the obvious choice.Well, having cloned the old drive on to this one, we ran our application and experienced a performance drop. We had a 15% performance gain a few months back when we went from 2GB memory to 4GB. We lost that gain with this drive. Additionally the drive is significantly noisier than the old Maxtor - not an issue in our case since the server is in a location where there aren't any people, but if considering this drive for a desktop, be prepared.I'm hoping that the robustness/reliability will compensate for the performance loss we're now seeing. We'll probably let the drive go another few days and decide. Maybe we'll just stick with the old Maxtor and the clone we keep and find a different purpose for these black drives.I'm somewhat disappointed.Update 5/14/11 - raised rating to 4 star. Changed setting in Dell BIOS under HD Acoustics from Performance to "Let the drive decide" and got back the 15% performance drop we saw. Additionally drive is significantly quieter now, and performing faster. I was still hoping for a performance gain from the original Maxtor drive that was replaced. We'll see. For now, I'm happier.

источник

Интеллектор-8NZXA

07.03.2012

8/10

Оценка пользователя

Хорошо

I bought this drive to replace a Green version that started to fail after only a few months. I've only had it installed for about 3 days, I use it in a system that I built used mainly for casual gaming. It has an AMD FX 6100 processor, Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX Motherboard, Kingston Technology Hyper X 8GB DDR3 memory and an ATI Radeon HD 5450 graphics card...It ran very well with the Green until it started to fail and now it seems a little choppy with this drve, not sure if it's the video card or the drive trying to keep up, all in all the drive is working good though

источник

Показаны отзывы 9-56 из 479.