Отзывы о Фотоаппарат Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100

I just have to say that after a month of research for a new camera for my vacation, I decided on the RX100 and was VERY pleased with my choice when it arrived 3 weeks ago, and was very impressed overall...TODAY, I found out they are releasing a mark 2 in a few weeks!!! there was NO whispers on the internet about this, if I had known I would have waited!!! So a little annoyed about that, but glad I went with this series, even though my NEW camera is now OLD!So, anyone considering THIS camera should wait IMO...I wish I had known.

2/10/13 update: just returned from a very nice warm vacation. This camera continues to amaze in excellent ways. Low light performance is astounding for a point and shoot. The "hand held twilight" setting alone is worth its weight in gold. Also the "dynamic range optimization" options are very very good and make a great difference in the pictures. Took this to the beach daily (in a great USA gear case and plastic zip lock bag). Wonderful beach pictures - detail is excellent, colors are great. I can find no faults with this technological marvel. So, OK, I'll up my rating to 5 stars even though the user manual is an abomination.Really a great camera. Very versatile, excellent stills and video. The only complaint is the user manual: Virtually useless for anything but the most basic of functions, An unnavigable, poorly thought-out piece which was obviously put together by a bunch of engineers. PLEASE, Sony, hire some marketing/ technical writer types to figure out how to present all the great features of this camera in a usable, readable, navigable, user-friendly and readily accessible document.

If you have money to spend, or you don't want to fuss with an SLR and want above average point-and-shoot image quality, consider this camera. If you have an SLR, and just want a pocket camera to carry around when you don't really care about having top image quality, save your money and buy the Canon S100 at more than half the price. The difference in image quality is only noticeable under a magnifying glass. Besides, if you shoot with an SLR, point-and-shoot image quality is always going to be disappointing, so you might as well be disappointed with a little more money to spend on your SLR gear.

I love everything about this camera. It's small. It's quiet. Huge sensor. Fast lens. And all the software enhancements that make your old DSLR feel like an antique.Take the facial recognition: previously you had to focus on the eyes, recompose and shoot. But if you were shooting at a large aperture there was a good chance recomposing would render the eyes OOF. Now you can shoot at f/1.8 and you don't have to worry that the shot will be in-focus because the camera automatically detects and focuses correctly.Panoramas used to be a royal pain with DSLRs--you'd take a bunch of pictures then load up stitching software to put it all together. That's all done automagically.HDR support? Built-in. You can even choose how many stops of HDR you'd like.Low-light? You can shoot in the dark with this thing.Macro? You can hold the camera an inch away from whatever you're shooting.Basically it does everything you could ever want a camera to do but it fits in your pocket. This is the perfect point-and-shoot for the pro that doesn't want to lug around gear.

Having had a multitude of digital cameras over the years from SLR to pocket sized point and shoot this is the best I've encountered. No doubt it will be a big seller. I bought it purely based on Pogue's review in the NY Times.I ordered it directly from the SONY site because I wanted it for a business trip immediately.So far very impressed with all the features, the user dials and interface are not confusing, the manual is built into the camera for easy reference, and there are plenty of helpful shooting guides to remind you of what to do under different shooting situations.This camera's BIG shortcoming is in the delicate flash that pops up under low light conditions. Any casual observer will see that the likelihood of the flash having issues with use is very high. That very thought went through my head upon opening the packaging... In an era of high risk with consumer product launches, it's hard to believe that there wasn't a discussion on the design team about how the camera would be carried (pocket sized!) or with a delicate moving part having issues under even nominally normal conditions (meaning not encased in bubble wrap at all times).....Went to my business meeting, took some great photos under low light conditions, packed the camera in my luggage as I would any pocket camera, upon unpacking guess what.....the flash had popped up in my luggage and was damaged and would no longer close or open.I called Sony and without any hassle are exchanging the camera (2 weeks of use!).....but even if you treat this like a precious jewel, the odds are 12-18 months from now you'll see many RX100 owners walking around with flashes they manually open and close.....

This camera is amazing, I wear it sling style with the matching sony leatherette case and keep it on me all the time, the .jpg files from this camera take editing so well in lightroom/photoshop. the AF is amazingly quick, there are so many other features that continue to amaze me with this thing. the battery life is great, the flash is decent, and 20mp gives you lots of detail. I would definitely recommend this to anyone. Only cons I can think of are that you should buy a chinese external battery charger off amazon/ebay, I have no problem with gripping the camera since I use the leatherette case and keep it in there, and people say they wish the control ring clicked like a canon s95/s100 but it honestly makes little to no difference unless you are dumb and cant control how much you turn it.bottom line this camera is awesome.

The RX-100 is a pocket sized camera, 20Mp, has a Carl Zeius lens, 18-135 f/1.8 and a 2x extender built in, not digital zoom and barely degrades the image. (don't know how they do that) It has a 1 inch sensor, has RAW capability. HDR built in and variable from +-1 to +-6 stops. Can take up to 12 frames a sec. ISO up to and including 3200 is very usable. Can be set to take 6 images HDR in extremely low light and produce a usable image. All the HDR settings can be done hand held, has a wonderful processor that stitches them seamlessly. Can do all manual, even manual focus. manual focus has highlighting that shows in red the areas that are in focus, makes focusing a breeze. This is the coolest camera I have ever owned and the quality of images rivals any DSLR I have had. The rx-100 go's with me anywhere I go, and is now my favorite camera. It has all the controls we are used to in an SLR, so easy to learn the menus. I think for the camera capabilities 650.00 is a good price for this gear. I could go on on the features.Down side.It has no viewfinder, I am finding that very hard to get used to. It is VERY small, I put a strap on it and keep that around my neck, I am afraid I will drop it.No external mic jack for video. I rarely do video, but like ext mic's.No hot shoe. The flash is shit. Ok, that said, it will take a clear pic in light you just would not believe unless you try it yourself.All in all, this is a fantastic (incredible) camera, you will not be disappointed. Is it a bridge? Hmmmmm, I would call it a Pro point and shoot.

I can imagine two groups at Sony, the engineers that created this product and the cost accountants that complained about the cost overruns. The engineers did a great job. In my use testing for a couple of days, the results were excellent, not much different in some outdoor situations from a top full frame rangefinder camera. Compared to a Leica D-Lux-5 or Canon S95 (which I own), the images are better, although both of those cameras do a very good job.But I surmise that the accountants pulled all costs out of this by leaving out a real user manual, neck strap, discs and battery charger. There was a newspaper-like printed manual, but just the very basics. No software; you need to download that, and it's very confusing to use. For a $650 camera why not package it with a leather or cloth case?Overall it took excellent images, but I felt like Sony nickeled and dimed me. There's so many features that are not covered in the manual that makes it frustrating to use. I eventually returned it because, while it takes better images, it's not that much better to require me to lay out $700, and devote a few days to understand all of its features.On the positive size, the Sony has accomplished what no other camera company has been able to do, creating a camera that's better than any other pocket-sized camera.For those that say you can print out their on line extensive manual, that's not so easy; it's a tutorial, not a PDF file and you need to print it out one page at a time. I love how so many come to Sony's defense for omitting something so basic as a detailed manual that describes each function.

This is a fine little camera, with great resolution, fine images, and excellent low light capabilities. I selected it after careful research to supplement my large camera as a pocketable camera to always have with me. The menu driven operation is not too complex and I really enjoyed shooting this little camera. But for me, it had a fatal flaw--it had the most confounded way of turning itself on and off after I had definitely turned it off. Several times, after leaving a fully charged camera on the table at home and "OFF." I returned at the end of the day to find it "on"--lens extended with a depleted battery! And don't dare put this camera in your pocket for a an afternoon's walk, for any kind of pressure seems to turn it accidentally on. This morning, I had enough of this, and so am returning it to Amazon tomorrow. Research on another site showed me that my problem with this camera was not unique. Haven't decided what to replace it with, since it was supposed to be at the top of the small zooms.

This little camera packs a punch its the best point and shoot camera I ever picked up! quality is amazing it rivals that of DSLR's. cameras..it is a expensive little camera, but if you want the best this is it and its worth it..pictures are very sharp and crisp it has many features to play with and video is amazing to...

One star because the memory card did not work? What a dork. I am a professional photographer and this baby is way better that most of my high end Canons.

I own Nikon D3s with another full frame lens but I still carry this compact SONY "all the time". No camera bag, no strap needed to carry this thing. It fits into every pants I wear.Not trying to replace this my Nikon pro gear with this tiny thing but it is so fast that I can catch every moment (fast focus) at everywhere (small camera does not catch attention). What else can I ask for with $600? A very smart compact so hard to screw up.The high ISO noise can not compare with FX, the accuracy/speed is not pro level but I bet you will like to carry it everywhere you go. The best choice for pro user. I own a Canon S100 a few months before this but I found this SONY is the one I always carry.

I've been using this camera for about 6 months for casual photography and so far really like it and the image quality.To highlight one aspect: the capability of using the lens ring for manual focusing has solved a big issue I've always had with my previous P&S cameras... getting an exact focus on one portion of an object. When in manual focus mode, twisting the lens ring immediately zooms the LCD view to tiny area in the image field so you can precisely set the zoom (without worrying about whether your eyesight is accurate enough ;-) and then restores the full image view in the LCD shortly after ring motion has stopped. I now find my self using this capability much more than not, with the result of more crisp pictures than when just relying on the AF.My only disappointment so far... seems like the flash is a bit harsh (so I try to avoid using it as much as possible), but OTOH I haven't tried to tweak it yet or see if I can make it more indirect, etc.

I've been waiting for this camera for over 8 years...want something that I can actually carry with me everywhere in my pocket rather than around my neck but that takes incredible pictures and has fantastic controls. I probably bought and returned 6 to 8 cameras over the years hoping that they would do it and they never could. Canon's Powershot S90/S95/S100 cameras were headed in the right direction but the sensor was too small for true low-light photography; same story with Panasonic's Lumix LX5/LX7 cameras. I thought Canon was going to pull it off with the huge sensor in the G1-X, but after shooting with it for 3 days it went back because it's too big, can't focus well, and has a crazy minimum focus distance problems which means you can never get close to subjects no matter how much you zoom in because as you zooom you have to back up so much that the shot was never actually any closer.This camera is incredible and changes the landscape of high-end point-and-shoots forever. My Nikon D7000 is an amazing camera but is now going on Ebay. While the RX100 might not be able to take pictures that are quite as good, and the smaller sensor definately has limitations, the point is that this camera has finally gotten "close enough" to make the trade-off worth it. I don't have my D7000 with me so many times because it's huge, so it doesn't matter how good the shots are. Now, I'll always have the chance to get the shots that matter... because I'll have a fantastic camera in my pocket.

I was seduced into buying this camera by reading David Pogue's review in "The New York Times." Took it on a trip to Montana, got great shots of Glacier National Park. The battery lasts forever; I have yet to exhaust it on a shoot, even after a full day of hiking & taking photos. Also - it's very small, fits in a pocket or in my purse (even my small ones).Very pleased with the quality of the shots, and the many features. The panorama feature is great ... saves the usual multi-photo stitching together in Photoshop afterward. The video is also very good, both sound and image. Now I can carry my Canon 7D with my telephoto lens and this Sony and get the variety of photos I want. Lots easier than lugging my other full-size SLR with another (heavy) lens, along with the 7D.One useful thing is the immediate in-camera help available for the camera's various features. The information displays on the LED screen, answering many questions I'd have had to research in the manual otherwise. Handy.It also works well in low-light situations, to the amazement of my friends. The pix aren't quite as sharp as those in strong light, but they're not grainy and the colors look pretty good.I strongly recommend this camera. Looks like I may end up using it as my go-to camera, esp. while traveling.

It has good recycle, images are crisp and flash is adequate. It sturdy and compact. It's is sensor is large enough to enable sizable enlargements.

I bought the Sony RX100 to replace my 5 year old Canon G9 which I use for travel and to shoot photos and videos and blues and rock concerts. While the Canon G9 was great in its day, for concert photos you had to use a high ISO setting and the photos had a lot of noise in them that required some editing to improve sharpness, increase contrast etc.I've looked into more recent G10, G11, G12, G1X, Fujifilm X10 and others, but the Sony Rx100 beats them all. It is the most compact and has the largest sensor and a very fast lens. It's also got extremely fast focus and shot-to-shot time. So overall it's excellent for travel or for concert photos. Even though the optical zoom is only 3.6x because of the large sensor and 20mp photo size, you can use the fancy digital zoom without much degradation.Alas, the Sony RX100 is not perfect. The audio quality for concerts is not as good as the G9 or G10. At loud volumes (e.g. 100db) there will be some distortion (e.g. clipping) of the audio. It's better than the Fujifilm X10 or Canon S95, S100, but not as good as Canon G9, G10. Still if you are not in really loud concerts it may be fine.I highly recommend this camera. Great image quality, fast focus, great burst mode, built-in creative effects and small enough you can take it anywhere. Very easy to use; you can keep it on automatic for most things and get great shots or use the Aperature or Shutter Priority or other modes as you want to explore and learn more.

I am a traditional (amateur) photographer, and I simply don't like cameras that have no viewfinder. With that said, this is a good camera. The photo quality is fantastic, and the speed is also awesome. If I had to do it again, I would have gotten one of the canon models that has zoom and an optical viewfinder. I know - the optical viewfinders are not accurate representations of what you're going to get. Neither are the LCD's. As a backup camera, I'm willing to accept this model for what it is, but I won't buy another point and shoot in the future unless it has some way of letting me isolate the shot, and frame without looking at a screen as though it is a cellphone. At that point, I'll just use my iPhone camera. Another thing - there are SO MANY settings on this camera, I just don't know which one is right; I don't have all the time in the world to test fire shots either, so I'm more likely to use manual anyway.

I sold my RX100 after a month because I found its noise levels unacceptable. The images were very grainy even at base ISO and broad daylight. Too many pixels in too small a sensor.

The first timeI turned on the camera i said to my self, " wow this is a baby NEX". The beautiful, crystal clear screen lights up and shows vivid colors making the composition screen a joy to look at. The build quality is absolutely sturdy, and the lens dial ring is so smooth, it feels like a focusing ring of a high quality lens. Im glad that sony did not incorporate click stops on the ring like what you get on the canon s100. It helps to avoid any unnecessary sounds being recorded on your final video file if you choose to manipulate settings while you shoot video. The built in carl zeiss lens delivers superb pictures with very good sharpness overall. I would definitely recommend this little beast to anybody who plans on upgrading their point and shoot camera as this give you pretty much most of the features that a dslr or micro four thirds camera has to offer except for the ability to change lenses. If you are the type of person who appreciate pocket friendly camera that delivers big performance, look no further, this will be a great companion for you. For anybody who is wondering, this is made in Japan, and it seems like sony was pretty serious when designing and developing this gadget as they did not cut any corners when it comes to their elite creation. Im not a fan when it comes to sony cameras at all, however this camera changed the way I looked at sony imagine products, Well done sony, all the reviews are very true, Hats off to you...

I own a Nikon D800 and I must say that the Sony DSC-RX100 is by far the best compact camera out there. If you know how to use it, the resulting images are simply amazing. It Does phenomenally well in low light. I shoot RAW exclusively and do post processing in Adobe Lightroom 4. Even at 6400 ASA the images can be tweaked and look great. All the negative reviews here about this camera must have been written by people who have no clue how to use a high end camera such as this. The quality is outstanding. Using it and understanding the interface takes a little time. But once who do understand and have it set up to your liking it is sweet. Battery life is great. The flash takes about 4 seconds between shots to charge. This is NOT a big deal. It is a point and shoot and not a DSLR. In closing I like to say to the nay-Sayers, do your homework, practice and get used to the camera. In the end this is the best compact camera. Period

It's a great camera, I'm using it for those times that I don't want tocarry my Panasonic FZ-200 which is about 2.5X the weight. The thing that sold me on this was the review and still photos (of brown shoes among other things) by Ming Thein. (Thanks)Biggest Pros:-Image quality at high ISO settings >400.-Weight.-Size. Fits in a Kata DF-408 DL bag just right.-Automatic lens cover.-Electronic (roll/pitch)level.Biggest Cons:-The manual PDF has copyright on each page, it may be an issue when you take to your local print shopand get a spiral bound manual for about twelve.-Location of tripod mount is poor. To avoid this and other design compromises a larger camera body would be OK with me.-The help menu would be useful if it actually said something about each item.-EVF missing. The one used on the FZ-200 is what I want. Don't want an expensive add on accessory like the LX7 though which might fall off, break, etc.-Grip missing, forced into purchasing Richard's accessory grip for forty incl shipping. Related to thatthe Sony wrist strap needs a cinching ring like the Olympus wrist strap.The Pros outweigh Cons today, but this may change as competitors show up, and I won't buy a future product without the Cons being fixed. Fool me twice, shame on me.Made in Japan.

My Sony RX100 crept out of my jacket pocket while on a bike ride (going about 15 16mph). It hit the asphalt and bounced twice before rolling into the grass. I feared the worst. Inspection showed several 3-4mm scratches on the front adjacent to the control ring and a nick on the top beveled edge by the "Sony" label. The good news -- everything works perfectly. However, I am definitely going to be more careful about where I put the camera when biking -- the camera is too good and too expensive to lose through such carelessness. Best pocket camera around. My only complaint is the learning curve. The camera does a lot but it takes a while to get fluent with the controls. It is one of those cameras where if you quit using it for a while you will need a refresher course and the manual (including the downloadable one) isn't very good. I wish they would add a few buttons -- exposure compensation, ISO, and white balance would have helped.

Just an amateur enthusiast here, but to my untrained eye, this Sony is almost perfect. I own many cameras, including the Leica X1, Nikon D5000, Canon S90, S95, and S100. My wife and I have 2 kids now, and most always took one of the Canons with us since they're so small and take great pictures as well. But after comparing the Canons with the RX100, the advantages of the Sony is that it focuses much faster (when on the Auto setting), and takes much better lower light photos. If you're looking for an all-around camera to chase the kids around, that's portable, and takes awesome photos, you can't go wrong here. The only "downside" is that it costs about 30%-40% more than other compact digicams.